ES0" Fiscal Year 2000 (I October 19 - 30 eptmbr200 Part 2 of 2 * @6* e~g I * *6*II I, i~i~;~ I~(B 0 ~ Sl TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Northwestern Division Omaha, NE, District Kansas City, MO, District Portland, OR, District Seattle, WA, District Walla Walla, WA, District Pacific Ocean Division Honolulu, HI, District Alaska District South Pacific Division Los Angeles, CA, District San Francisco, CA, District Sacramento, CA, District ... California Debris Commission Albuquerque, NM, District ... Southwestern Division Little Rock, AR, District Tulsa, OK, District Fort Worth, TX, District Galveston, TX, District M ississippi River Com m ission ............................................ Engineer Research and Development Center .................................. W ater Resources Support Center ............................. .......... Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ....... .............................. International Boundary Water Boards .................. ................... Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ........................ Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness ................ ......... ..... .. Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities .............. ...... ... 26-1 27-1 28-1 29-1 30-1 31-1 32-1 33-1 34-1 35-1 35-1-A 36-1 37-1 38-1 39-1 40-1 41-1 42-1 43-1 44-1 45-1 46-1 47-1 48-1 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~rr + REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Chapter Appendices Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ..................................... .. A-I Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers but Operated by Others ........................... ........... A-26 Flood Control Projects Under Construction .................................. B-1 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction ...................... ... B-16 Environmental Restoration Projects Under Construction ................... ..... B-19 Navigation Locks and DamsOperable ...................................... C-1 Navigation Project Under Construction ..................................... D-l Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable .......................... E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction .................. F-1 Flood Damages Suffered and Prevented ..................................... G-1 Index I-1 ii OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in the drainage basin of the Missouri River along the mainstem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Page 26-3 26-3 Flood Control 3 Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD 4 Bear Creek Lake, CO 5. Big Sioux River & Skunk Creek, Sioux Falls, SD 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 7. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND 8. Chatfield Lake, CO 9. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 10. Fall River Basin, SD 11. Logan Creek, Pender, NE 12. Milk River, Malta, MT 13. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD 14. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA 15. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA 16. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 17. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE 18. Perry Creek, IA 19. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) 20. Pipestem Lake, ND 21 Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE 22. South Platte River Basin, CO 23. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 24. Van Bibber Creek, CO 25. Wood River, Grand Island, NE 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 28. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-3 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-5 26-5 26-5 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-7 26-7 26-7 26-7 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-10 26-10 26-10 Environmental 29. Boyer Chute, NE 30. California Bend, NE 31. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 32. Hidden Lake/Great Marsh, NE 33. Lower Decatur, NE 34. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, & ND 35. Nathan's Lake 36 Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 37. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 38 Fort Peck Lake, MT 39. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 40. Garrision Dam Major Rehabilitation, Lake Sakakawea, ND 41. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND 42. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 43. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND 44. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE 45. Pierre, SD Miscellaneous 46. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update 26-1 Page 26-1 1 26-11 26-12 26-12 26-12 26-13 26-13 26-13 26-14 26-14 26-15 26-15 26-15 26-16 26-16 26-16 26-17 26-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Miscellaneous (continued) Page 47. National Emergency Preparedness (NEPP) 26-18 48. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency (FC&CE) 26-18 49. General Regulatory Functions 26-18 50. General Investigations (See Table 26-K) 26-18 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement 26-19 26-B Authorizing Legislation 26-26 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 26-32 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 26-33 26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26-35 26-G Deauthorized Projects 26-36 26-H Missouri River Levee System Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 26-38 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program 26-39 26-J Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 26-40 26-K Active General Investigations 26-44 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-46 26-M Environmental 26-47 26-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous Projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends. closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in FY 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities is included in the Missouri River navigation maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations During FY. District personnel accomplished channel reconnaissance, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. Government Hired Labor Forces completed maintenance, which consisted of placing stone on damaged structures and placing structure markers to aid navigation. 2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. Flood Control 3. ABERDEEN, SD Location. This project is in the Moccasin Creek subbasin in the city of Aberdeen, Brown County, South Dakota. Aberdeen is located in the James River Valley in the northeast quarter of South Dakota. Existing Project. The selected alternative is a 100- year event levee 2.9 miles long on the northeast side of Aberdeen that will prevent 49 percent of the average annual flood damages to structures and contents in that area. The proposed levee will essentially block existing drainage to Moccasin Creek, and a combination of culverts with gates and detention ponds were incorporated into the design to mitigate this interior drainage problem. A two-foot road raise at Fairgrounds Road is also included. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended applies. The city of Aberdeen and Brown County is paying the local share of the project. Operations During FY. Preparation of the plans and specifications were completed for Phase II construction. The Phase I construction contract to construct a 1.4 mile long earth fill levee on the northeast side of Aberdeen was completed this FY with final inspection on November 11, 1999. Advertisement and award of Phase II will occur once necessary Real Estate interests have been obtained. 4. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. The dam site is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO, about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. 26-3 ~_ __ __~_ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing Project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet; and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 5. BIG SIOUX RIVER AND SKUNK CREEK, SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA Location. Sioux Falls is located on a large bend of the Big Sioux River and at the confluence with Skunk Creek in the south half of Minnehaha County in southeastern South Dakota. Existing Project. The project builds upon an existing project. It consists of raising an existing levee from the diversion dam to the upstream tie-off, raising the diversion channel levee, modifying the chute and stilling basin, raising the diversion dam, raising the levees on Skunk Creek, raising big Sioux levees downstream of Skunk Creek, and providing for bnridge improvements. Local Cooperation. This project is authorized under Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the city of Sioux Falls to sponsor the Big Sioux River project was executed on 14 August 2000. The current non-Federal cost estimate is $10, 150,000. The current Federal cost estimate is $30,450,000, for a total project cost of $40,600,000. Operations During FY. Planning, engineering and design was completed this FY and construction phase activities initiated. The solicitation for bid on Phase IA for the first portion of the modifications to the existing reinforced concrete chute and stilling basin structures and associated sub-drain system was issued on 8 September 2000 for award in October of 2000. 6. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. The dam site is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing Project. An earth-fill dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and a reservoir with a flood storage capacity of about 72,700 acre-feet, plus 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 7. BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ND (LAND ACQUISITION) Location. The Buford Trenton Irrigation District (BTID) is located in the flood plain along the left (north) bank of the Missouri River near its confluence with the Yellowstone River, in Williams County near Williston, ND. Existing Project. The project consists of the acquisition of permanent flowage and saturation easements within and surrounding the BTID for land that has been affected by rising ground water and the risk of surface flooding. There are approximately 70 affected landowners and 90 tracts. Approximately 10,000 acres are irrigable and 1,750 non-irrigable. Acquisition of easements and relocation assistance under P. L. 91-646 began in FY 1998. Estimated project cost is $40,129,000. Location Cooperation. The project is authorized under Section 336(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, P. L. 104-303. Local cooperation is not applicable. Operations During FY. This FY, fifteen easements were purchased totaling $5,505,000 with associated costs. 26-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Appraisal of existing tracts will continue into FY 2001 along with the purchase of additional easements. 8. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing Project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a crest length of 12,500 feet; a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acrefeet, which will be used for recreation; and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps participated with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and was physically completed in 1992. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1993 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 9. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO, just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver, Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and a crest length of 14,300 feet. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in FY 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 10. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook, and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing Project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during FY 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in FY 1953 with the exception of a road and parking area, which were completed in FY 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs Dam was completed in FY 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities, which were completed in FY 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. 11. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER, NE Location. This project is located in northeastern NE, approximately 75 miles north-northwest of Omaha, NE. Pender is located along the right bank of Logan Creek, about midpoint in the Logan Creek basin. 26-5 _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing Project. The selected plan is a combination levee and floodwall with a detention storage feature. It provides flood protection from Logan Creek as well as incidental benefit from Stage Creek flooding to the Village's residential and industrial area as well as its central business district. The levee extends approximately 15,000 feet in length along the north, east, and south edge of the community, averaging 10 feet in height. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The Village of Pender is paying the local share of the project. Operations During FY. Construction was complete in September 2000 with final inspection on July 12, 1999. O&M Manuals, Real Estate Certification and project closeout are projected for completion in 2001. 12. MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Location. This project is located in Phillips County in North Central MT. The city of Malta is located approximately 170 miles northeast of Great Falls, MT. Existing Project. The selected plan is a levee/floodwall constructed along the right bank of the Milk River to provide protection for the area immediately upstream from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) bridge. The project consists of an earthen levee that is 1,800 ft in length, combined with a floodwall that extends 1,040 ft. The height of the levee ranges from 4 to 10 ft above natural ground along its entire length. The levee/tloodwall requires a tie-off with the existing BNSF grade on the downstream end. Local Cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Malta participated in the project's costsharing requirements utilizing a $176,500 grant from the State of MT combined with real estate interests of approximately $282,000. Operations During FY. Construction phase is essentially complete with remaining requirements directed toward project management, coordination with local sponsors and project closeout. 13. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing Project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. The project provides erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, and at the same time preserves high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,640,000 (1996) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $640,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds. Local Cooperation. All recreational construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the state of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986; and the Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Construction was completed in June 1987 and June 1991, respectively. Operations During FY. Construction for bank stabilization at Ponca State Park was completed with final inspection on March 17, 2000. Coordination and preparation of a Preliminary Restoration Plan for the Ponca Aquatic Habitat Restoration was completed. Evaluation and alternatives were provided for seven potential areas for streambank protection. A design agreement dated March 1, 2000 was entered into with the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission for the construction of the Ponca Resource and Education Center for 50/50 costshared recreational development. 14. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing Project. Construction of dikes, revetments 26-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) Operations During FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 15. NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Location. This project, the Nishnabotna River and Main Ditch 6 at Hamburg, IA is located in Fremont County, 40 miles south-southeast of Omaha, NE. Existing Project. The selected plan determined in the feasibility investigations is the construction of a levee approximately 8,300 ft in length along the left bank of Main Ditch No. 6. A range of economically feasible plans were identified from which the city of Hamburg selected and is supported by the Corps. A levee will be constructed along Main Ditch 6 with a levee top, referenced as the 911.0 m.s.l. plan having an accedence equivalent to a 300-year event and a 46 percent reliability passing 500-year event. Selection of a levee height was constrained by the elevation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad mainline tracks. The BNSF has raised its mainline track approximately 1.5 ft to accommodate the new levee. Local Cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Hamburg is participating in the project's costsharing requirements utilizing a Community Development Block Grant to help fund real estate interests of approximately $130,500 and cash contributions of $226,800. Operations During FY. Completion of construction contract occurred with final inspection in September 1999. Remaining requirements are directed toward project management coordination with local sponsors and project closeout. 16. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair and flows south-easterly through metropolitan Omaha. It is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creeks flow along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing Project. The project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvements, an effluent storage facility, and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake, Glenn Cunningham Lake, and Wehrspann Lake. Estimated total costs for the project is $68,659,000 consisting of $64,334,000 in Federal funds ($1,367,000 to be reimbursed by the non-Federal sponsor) and $2,958,000 non-Federal other costs and cash contributions. Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Construction was completed on recreation facilities at Ed Zorinsky Lake, and on the Big Papillion Creek Channel flood control project. The recreational facilities at Zorinsky Lake have been transferred to the City of Omaha for operations and maintenance. The Big Papillion Creek channel flood control project has been transferred to the Papio Natural Resource District for operation and maintenance. O&M manuals are being prepared. 17. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, NE, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing Project. The project includes a 3.6 mile-long levee along the Elkhorn River with a maximum height of 5 ft(a modification to the original Pebble Creek project), one closure structure at U.S. HWY 275 at the northern edge of Scribner, and several ramps over the two levees. An automated flood warning system was installed that will allow adequate time to operate the closure structure. Both levees are completed which essentially is one ring levee that provides protection for the entire city of Scribner. Local Cooperation. The city of Scribner strongly supported the entire Pebble Creek levee project, including the Elkhorn River levee and its modification. The City obtained cost-sharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. 26-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations During FY. Construction of the Elkhorn River levee was initiated in March 1994 with the original contract being completed in December 1995. A modification to the Elkhom River levee was completed in July 1996. The total cost of the project was $3,232,000. The non- Federal portion of this totaled was $807,000 which includes $363,000 for lands, easements, and rights-of-way. Final audit and project closeout will occur in FY 2001. 18. PERRY CREEK, IA Location. The Perry Creek basin is located in Woodbury and Plymouth Counties in northwestern Iowa. The downstream five miles of the basin lie within the corporate limits of Sioux City, IA, and drain the central portion of the city. Existing Project. The project consists of 14,800 linear feet of grass and rock lined channel, 1,500 linear feet of new conduit, modification of 7 10 linear feet of existing conduit, and a concrete stilling basin, to provide capacity for the 100-year event. Also included are 4.25 miles of hiking/biking trail and a basin-wide flood warning system. Estimated project cost is $70,000,000, of which $45,400,000 is Federal cost and $24,600,000 is non- Federal cost. Local Cooperation. The project is authorized under the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The city of Sioux City, IA, is the local sponsor. Operations During FY Relocation of the State of South Dakota's railroad bridge by the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad was completed in FY 00. Construction for Phases II and III remained ongoing. Design efforts for Phase IV award, scheduled for FY 01, were initiated. 19. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the Missouri River and several of its pnncipal tributaries and in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing Project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on the Missouri River main stem and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 20. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, three miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing Project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 21. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing Project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alternations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of the Salt Creek survey report, additional units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed 26-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are descrinbed min full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 22. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing Project. General plan for flood control and other purposes to provide for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 23. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Location. The project area is approximately I10 square miles. It extends from Thurman, IA, on the north to the mouth of the Nishnabotna River on the south and from the Missouri River on the west to the bluffs on the east. Existing Project. The flood problem was caused by floodwaters backing up behind the existing levees when drainage structures are closed during high flows on these rivers. Two pump stations have been built to alleviate this flooding in the southern half of the study area. The cost through construction was $1,040,760 Federal and $346,921 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. Fremont County, IA and five drainage districts were the cost-sharing sponsors. Operations During FY. The project was completed in April 1997. Final audit and project closeout are complete. 24. VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Location. Van Bibber Creek is a right bank tributary of Ralston Creek with the confluence in Arvada, CO. The potential project area includes approximately one mile of the downstream portion of the creek located partially in Arvada and partially in Jefferson County. Existing Project. The propoed project would include channel improvements including an underground conduit to convey Van Bibber Creek flood waters to Ralston Creek. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, applies. Operations During FY. Plans and specifications activity for the FY consisted of sponsor acquisition of LERRD's and Project Cooperation Agreement review. Project coordination of remaining work is ongoing. 25. WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NE Location. This project is located in Hall County Nebraska, approximately midway between the city of Grand Island and Interstate 80. Existing Project. This project consists of a five-mile long diversion channel with levees on both sides. The channel will divert Wood River flood flows to the Platte River. The diversion structure will be located downstream from the Highway 281 bridge that crosses the Wood River. The diversion channel will begin at that point and run eastward to the Platte River. The current county and city bridges that cross the channels will be designed and constructed by the sponsor. One bridge for the Union Pacific Railroad will be constructed. In addition, a two-mile long tie-off levee and small diversion channel will be built west of highway 281 to prevent Wood River flood flows from spilling into the Warm slough basin nearby and outflanking the diversion channel. Local Cooperation. This project is authorized under the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996, Section 101K modified by WRDA of 1999, Section 335. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA with the Central Platte Natural Resources District was executed on 2 May 2000. The current non-Federal cost estimate is $4,134,000. The current Federal cost estimate is $10,698,000, for a total project cost of $14,832,000. Operations During FY. Developed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood plain mapping for the west end of the project and coordinated with the sponsor on real estate acquisition. The Railroad 26-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Relocation Contract with the Union Pacific Railroad was executed on 1 1 February 2000 with railroad bridge design completed during the FY. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the FY are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. FY 2000 costs were $160,371. 27. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under Sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, the Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 2000 were $348,525; and total through September 30, 2000 were $9,762,415. 28. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Response Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) On July 26, 1999 the Omaha District responded to the Governor of South Dakota's requests for assistance regarding a dangerous long term flooding situation for the community of Waubay, SD. Waubay is located in a closed basin region and rising lake levels were threatening the city's sanitary lift station #7. The district worked closely with State and Federal agencies to look at programs to protect the lift station. The Corp's Advance Measures program was the answer to the impending danger. The Advance Measures project consisted of constructing a concrete box structure around the lift station and a earthen berm to protect the lift station from rising lake levels and future ice related damages. Cost for the project was $32,485. Construction was completed on November 23, 1999. Two Federally constructed projects damaged by August 1999 Flood Event have been repaired. The Federal projects were the Missouri River Levee Unit L-611-614 tieback levee near Council Bluffs, IA, and the Little Papillion Creek channel project in Omaha, NE. Repair cost were $72,636 and $482,210 respectively. Repairs to Missouri River Levee Unit L-611-614 was completed December 20, 1999 and Little Papillion Creek August 15, 2000. Operational Program Areas. FY costs as follows: Preparedness: All Hazards Planning Activities.............. $ All Hazards Training & Exercise.............. Facilities .............. . ............ .. ..... National Centers of Expertise .................... Emergency Operations: Response Operations .................... ..... After Action Report ............................. Post Flood Response ................... Acquisition of Supplies & Equipment........ Support From Others ................................... Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works: Rehab. Federal Flood Control Works.......... Rehab. Non-Federal Flood Control Works.. Shore Protection ....... ........ ..................... Field Investigations ..... .. .. ............. Inspections .................... ....... ................ Interagency Levee Activities..................... Advance Measures: Advance Measure Assistance .................... Field Investigations.......................... Hazard Mitigation (By State): Hazard Mitigation Team Activities............. 424,441 39,930 27,845 0 223 0 0 0 179,357 621,216 259 0 51,080 40,563 0 542,756 10,698 O Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205,1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948 as amended.) 26-10 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Federal costs for FY 1999 were $203,454 for feasibility studies, $2,070,147 for plans and specifications and construction measures. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526,79th Cong., July 24, 1946 as amended.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Federal costs for FY 1999 were O$fo r projects in the Planning and Design Analysis Phase and $262,613 for projects in the construction phase. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Environmental 29. BOYER CHUTE, NE Location. The side channel connecting river mile 633.5 to 637.7 on the Missouri River in Washington County, NE, about 7 miles north of Omaha, NE. Existing Project. The project was constructed from October 1992 to April 1993. Its purpose is to restore flows from the Missouri River into an old river channel, Boyer Chute. This has restored fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and will benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The part of the old channel that was previously filled with sediment and grown up in young trees was cleared of vegetation, and a pilot channel for new inflows was excavated through it. Soil excavated from the pilot channel was placed along the channel to be washed away by restored chute flows over time. A 180-foot wide notch in the upstream riverbank was constructed for new inflows, and the chute's old outlet at the downstream end was widened. The culvert crossing of a road across the chute was replaced by a bridge, which passes adequate flows to prevent backwater effects and sedimentation. The total cost of about $4,019,000 was 25 percent costshared by a non-Federal sponsor. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $1,033,000 and cash of about $82,000. Operations During FY. A final project inspection was performed on May 3, 1995; and the project was tumed over to the local sponsor. Interim financial closeout during final year of monitoring occurred during FY 2000. 30. CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Location. The remnant river channel and floodplain land along river miles 648.5 - 650.0 along the Missouri River, in Washington County, about one mile east of Blair, NE. Existing Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The California Bend modification will restore river flows through the historic river channel adjacent to the navigation channel, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The downstream end of a 1.5-mile long backwater will be enlarged to provide a permanent connection to the navigation channel, and about I mile of excavation will connect its upstream end to the river. This will create permanent flows through about 2.5 miles of channels. Some of the surrounding farmland will be restored to floodplain forest. Also several of the spur dikes along the navigation channel will be lowered to enable navigation flows to create shallow margins along the river. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District is providing all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $367,000, and cash of about $699,000. Operations During FY. Plans and specifications and Sponsor acquisition of real estate interests were ongoing in FY 2000. 31. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION Location. Generally lands located in the state of South Dakota and acquired by the Secretary of the Army for the implementation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program. Lands to be transferred to the State are Corps land located above the top of the exclusive flood pool of the Oahe, Big Bend, Fort Randall and Gavins Point projects and located outside of the external boundaries of a reservation of an Indian Tribe. Lands to be transferred 26-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 to the Secretary of the Interior are lands located above the top of the flood pool of the Big Bend and Oahe projects and located within the external boundaries of the reservation of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe. Existing Project. Review and submittal to congress of wildlife habitat restoration plans developed by the State and Indian Tribes. Accomplish the transfer of Corps of Engineers land to the State of South Dakota and the Department of Interior for the two Indian Tribes. Estimated total cost of the project is $108,000,000. Local Cooperation. This project has no cost-sharing sponsor. The entire project is being borne by the Federal government with no cost to either local or tribal governments or the affected state. Therefore, no Project Cooperation Agreements are required. Restoration of terrestrial wildlife habitat loss programs are being accomplished by the transferees through the use of grant instruments until ten years from date of enactment under which the trust funds established under project authorization are fully capitalized. Operations During FY. Coordination efforts with state and tribal entities were initiated to establish roles and responsibilities and to draft and implement grant agreements. Cultural resource preservation, cultural site protection and scoping of environmental impact statement efforts were performed. 32. HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH, NE Location. A historic backwater adjacent to Missouri River miles 602.5-603.5, and a nearby marsh, in Sarpy County, about I mile south of Omaha and adjacent to Bellevue, NE. Existing Project The project being modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The Hidden Lake modification is restoring a historic backwater of the river to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A one mile long backwater lake which was filled with sediment in a rare flood event has been excavated and reconnected at its downstream end to the river. The Great marsh modification has removed sediment and encroaching plants to deepen and expand a marshy wetland, extending its life and benefiting the aquatic community. About 40 acres of wetland were excavated at an average of two feet deeper, increasing the marsh also in size. Total project costs are $3,020,000, with a Federal share of $2,266,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations During FY. Construction was essentially complete and post-construction monitoring continued. 33. LOWER DECATUR, NE Location. The Missouri River's right (west) overbank including side channels, from river mile 684.5 to 689 on the Missouri River in Burt County, NE, about 2 miles southeast of Decatur, NE. Existing Project. Modification of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project (MRBSN) constructed from 1935 to 1982. Lower Decatur Bend is one of many bend cutoffs (straightenings) created by the Corps during channelization of the Missouri River for navigation and bank stabilization. The proposed project modification includes 3 main off-stream aquatic components: sidechannel restoration, lowering of the riverward extent of closure spur dikes, and revetment lowering over an extended length to allow river flows to erode the river bank behind the revetment, thereby increasing the top width of the channel over an extended area. An opportunity exists at Lower Decatur Bend to restore the physical habitat to configurations more similar to those that existed prior to the channelization of this reach of the river. Total Project costs are estimated at $6,018,000, with a Federal share of $4,513,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District is providing all needed costsharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $574,000 and cash of about $1,076,000. Operation During FY. Feasibility studies were completed. 34. MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, & MO 26-12 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Location. The project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to the mouth near St. Louis, Mo. Existing Project. To mitigate a portion of the fish and wildlife habitat losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. Estimated total cost of the project is $84,500,000 federal funds. Local Cooperation. This project has no cost-sharing sponsor. The entire project is being borne by the Federal government with no cost to either local governments or the affected states. Therefore, no Project Cooperation Agreement is required. Although the four affected states are not participating financially in the project, the states are very actively involved in the planning and design of the project. The states also are participatming in the project by fimrnishing perpetual easements for construction and operation on existing state-owned lands. The states of Missouri and Iowa are the primary donors of such easements. Operations During FY. Efforts continued on acquiring land rights on 29,900 acres of land and agreements with the states for development on 18,200 acres of state-owned land, 16,900 of which is terrestrial habitat. Design work continued on the Blackbird-Tieville Bend and Kansas Bend. Two construction contracts were awarded to create wildlife habitat. 35. NATHAN'S LAKE/DEER CREEK AQUATIC HABITAT IMPROVEMENT, NE Location: The project is located in the Missouri River floodplain, several remnant wetland basins and a ditched creek channel, from river mile 632.8 to 633.5 on the Missouri River in Washington County, Nebraska, about 3 miles north of Omaha and 4 miles southeast of Ft. Calhoun, Nebraska. Existing Project. Construction of Nathan's Lake and Mud Lake islands and shallow fingers, expansion of wetland areas, construction of a diversion sediment basin and the west ditch and west berm. Additional work will include emphasis on palustrine emergent wetland benefits as well as stream riparian restoration related to those wetlands and the river. This is the first Section 206 project authorized for study nationwide and the work will be a component of the sponsor's Missouri River Corridor Plan. Local Cooperation. Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-303), as amended applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District is the local sponsor and providing all necessary cost shanng including real estate interests. Operations During FY. Plans and specifications were completed and construction initiated. 36. WEHRSPANN LAKE AQUATIC Location. The existing Papio Dam #20 and its Wehrspann Lake are located on a tributary to the South Branch Papillion Creek, West Branch Papillion Creek Basin, Sarpy County, NE, about 4 miles southwest of Omaha. The subimpoundment is located in the headwaters of Wehrspann Lake, within the lake's flood control pool, and within the existing project's boundaries. Existing Project. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Improvement Project - Modification of Wehrspann Lake, completed in 1984 as Papio Dam #20 for flood control and recreation; Congressional District: NE-2. Wehrspann Lake site is located within Omaha, NE metropolitan area, and as such it is highly visible, heavily utilized and important ecological, recreational, and educational resource. The modification, a subimpoundment in the lake's flood control pool, will play an essential role in maintaining water quality and fish habitat within Wehrspann Lake by decreasing the amounts of influent nutrients and especially sediment. Total project costs are currently estimated at $2,660,000 with a Federal share of $ 1,995,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District is providing all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations During FY. Project construction was initiated. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 37. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On the Missouri River, 987.4 miles above 26-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall reservoir (Lake Francis Case). Big Bend reservoir (Lake Sharpe) extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of five 58,500 kilowatt units, three 67,276 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,859,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operation During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. During the period, 1,157,122,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. 38. FORT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT Location. The reservoir is in the Missounri River Valley in McCone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest; and Nashua, nine miles north. Existing Project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,688,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on the original project in October 1933 and on the second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The five generators have a total output of 185,250 KW: two generators at 40,000 KW each, two generators at 43,500 KW each and one generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000, Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 912,980,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 39. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. Located on the Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet; a crest length of 10,700 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,494,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 7 10 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing and bridge approaches. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,062,867,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 40. GARRISON DAM MAJOR REHABILITATION, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of 26-14 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND, 1,389.9 miles about the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck. Existing Project. Garrison Dam is a multi-purpose project consisting of a rolled earth-filled dam with a sheet pile cutoff, a hydroelectric power plant, and a reservoir with storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre feet for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, irrigation, and municipal water supply. This major rehabilitation project will replace the turbine runners on all five existing units with new runners designed to improve reliability and maximize efficiency over a broad range of operating conditions for a total project cost of $37,122,000. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations During FY. Completed construction for two governor reconditioning contracts, bulkhead replacements and crane reconditioning. Construction for turbine runner replacement (with options exercised to rewind two generators) is in the fabrication stage for four of the turbines and efficiency testing for the first turbine to be brought on line. Engineering and design during construction for stress analysis, stud bolt testing and related efforts remains ongoing. 41. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units (three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each), three flood control tunnels, and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the prqject was $299,938,000, including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local Cooperation. None required except costsharing with the state of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,176,37 3,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 42. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about four miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above the mouth. Existing Project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 492,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000.Construction of the original project was initiated in March 1952 and completed in 1964. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 852,374,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity during FY. 43. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on the Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about six miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above the mouth. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet; a crest length of 9,300 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross 26-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 storage capacity of 23,137,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and the project was placed in operation in June 1963. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 3,148,230,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 44. MISSOURI RIVER, BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM, MT AND GAVINS POINT DAM, SD, NE Location. The project is located along the Missouri River between Fort Peck Dam, MT, and a point 59 miles downstream of Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE. Existing Project. Consists of undertaking measures, including maintenance and rehabilitation of existing structures, to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases from the six Missouri River main stem dams that the Secretary determines will be needed. In lieu of structural measures, lands may be acquired in affected areas from willing sellers. The costs of the measures shall be apportioned among project purposes as a joint-use operation and maintenance expense. Estimated Federal cost of the project is between $140 million for construction or $14 million for the land requisition alternative. Cost is limited to no more than $3 million per FY. Local Cooperation. Non-federal funds are not required for this project. One reach, the Missouri National Recreational River downstream from Gavins Point Dam, requires, under its separate authorization, that the landowners make available appropriate land interests to maintain the recreational and scenic qualities of the river and adjacent lands. In the other river reaches, lands can be acquired on a willing-seller basis if land acquisition is the recommended measure for erosion control at a given river site. Operations During FY. Continued coordination for sloughing easements in pursuit of real estate acquisitions in response to requests from landowners. Monitored previously constructed Section 33 projects. Continued cumulative impacts study to determine effects of bank erosion. 45. PIERRE, SD Location. The project area consists of the Missouri River just downstream of Oahe Dam near Pierre and Fort Pierre, South Dakota. Existing Project. The legislation authorizes that the Secretary may acquire from willing sellers such land and property in the vicinity of Pierre, South Dakota or flood proof or relocate such property within the project area, as the Secretary determines is adversely affected by the full wintertime Oahe Powerplant releases. Total cost of this project is held at $35,000,000 by authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. This project has no cost-sharing sponsor. The entire project is completely federally financed as the mitigation is for a problem caused by the Oahe Dam project. By funding the project 100 percent Federal, the costs are allocated to the Oahe Project with 45.83 percent of the costs considered as joint costs to allocate for repayment by the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA). When WAPA invokes the suballocation of 15.8 percent of power costs to future irrigation, the 45.83 percent joint use costs will actually result in a final cost share of 38.6 percent to be repaid by non-Federal interests. Operations During FY. Throughout the year, coordination with affected property owners to prioritize and finalize buyback or flood proofing remedies for each tract affected occurred. Ongoing appraisal activities, title evidence, and acquisition of forty-eight tracts with multiple owners resulted in relocation actions under the authority of PL 91-646. Twelve tracts and their affected owners received reimbursement under this authority. Owner's policies, warranty deeds and closing actions were also completed. Coordination and development of infrastructure agreements for the cities of Pierre and Fort Pierre were also drafted. 26-16 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Miscellaneous 46. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Location. The area being studied is the Missouri River basin, to include the Missouri River main stem system States included in the study area include Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, lowa, Kansas, and Missouri. Existing Project. During 1987 through 1992, the Missouri River basin experienced a moderate to severe drought, impacting upon the Missouri River main stem projects for the first time since filled in 1967. The drought has had severe impacts on people and industries that use the Missouri River and the main stem reservoirs for navigation, hydropower, water supply, and recreation. Some of the people impacted by the drought have stated that the current Master Water Control Manual for the Missouri River main stem system of reservoirs does not adequately take into consideration the contemporary needs of the basin. The purpose of the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update study is to determine the water control plan that best meets the needs of the Missouri River basin. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations/Activities During FY. Since 1998, NWD has been working intensely with all Basin entities involved in development of consensus flow management plans and continuing our government-to-government consultation with the 28 Basin Tribes. In January 2000, a NWD Preferred Alternative (PA) was announced. In March 2000, the USFWS indicated that the NWD PA would not preclude jeopardy of listed Missouri River species. The Corps requested the USFWS to move to formal consultation so that it could find out, in detail, what components need to be added to the current water control plan to preclude jeopardy. On 1 April 2000, formal consultation on the current operation of the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoirs, Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, and Kansas River Operations was initiated. A Final Biological Opinion (BO), received on 30 November 2000, concluded that current operations jeopardize the continued existence of the piping plover, interior least tern and pallid sturgeon. As a component of the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA), the USFWS indicated in their Final BO that higher spring releases and lower summer releases from Gavins Point Dam are necessary to preclude jeopardy. NWD released a Draft Implementation Plan (IP), which presents (conceptually) how NWD intends to implement the RPA's, Reasonable and Prudent Measures (RPM's), and measures to minimize take, that were included in the Final BO. The comment period for the Draft IP closed on 14 December 2000. A non-jeopardy alternative for the Missouri River Master Manual (MRMM) will be detailed in a Revised Draft EIS (RDEIS), which will be the subject of full public review and comment as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. The RDEIS is currently scheduled for publication in summer 2001. Implementation of a new water control plan is scheduled for March of 2003. No substantial change in the operation of the mainstem reservoir system will be implemented until the ROD is signed and the Master Manual is revised. 47. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPARENESS PROGRAM (NEPP) AND SUPPORT FOR FEMA P. L. 93-288 (and Antecedent Legislation) Continuity of Operations (510) National Preparedness Planning (520) Emergency Operations Center Support (530) Catastrophic Disaster Training and Exercise (560) Total Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program $ 22,020 72,907 3,013 9,897 $ 107,837 48. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC&CE) Flood control work under Authorization Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting. P. L. 84-99. Disaster Preparedness (100) Emergency Operations (200) Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (300) Advance Measures (400) Hazard Mitigation (600) Reimbursable Activities (900) Total FC&CE $ 483,216 223 713,118 553,454 0 179,357 $1,929,368 49. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS 26-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Environmental Impact Statement Administrative Appeals Reimbursable Activities Total Regulatory $ 4,060,154 241,774 173,728 58,955 11,432 86.971 $4,633,014 50. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS FY 2000 non-reimbursable costs totaled $2,142,522 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized projects). 26-18 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Sioux City, IA to Rulo NE) 3. Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 4. Bear Creek Lake, CO 5. Big Sioux River and Skunk Creek Sioux Falls, SD 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 7. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND (Land Acquisition) 8. Chatfield Lake, CO Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. 1,802,000 2,143,000 2,034,000 1,803,264 2.114,434 2.081,757 187,000 54,000 128,231 101,637 187,000 128,231 345,700 352,123 164,000 161,906 352,802 327226 30,084 4,539 54,000 382,886 101,637 331,765 360,000 416,000 364,699 417,667 155,000 130,000 159,626 131,588 2,300,000 2.327,000 2,071,907 2,421,119 773,000 955,000 791,429 954,737 783,000 794,914 2,001,438 1,986,394 5,000 44,760 250,000 20,744 255,000 65,504 540,276 534,838 525,000 297,450 186,830 186,978 5,760,000 5,852,428 831,042 826,005 1/ Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and 51,181,125 for previous project. 26-19 189,225,991 1/ 189,225,991 11/ 129,583,888 129,568,328 839,759 835,799 280,084 25,283 1,119,843 863,082 62,018,608 62,018,608 6,254,585 6,248,451 525,000 297,450 4,372,174 4,372,174 4,201.100 4,200,731 10,387,000 10,345,454 95,444,010 95,444,010 1,315,328 1,315,328 96,759,338 96,759,338 14,811,272 14,805,971 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 9. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 10. Fall River Basin, SD (Cottonwood & Coldbrook) 11. Logan Creek Pender, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 12. Milk River, Malta, MT Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 13. Missouri National Recreational River NE& SD Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work:, Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. 771,000 1,237,000 781,224 1,212239 324,000 344,833 229200 222,084 1,326,000 1,358,725 490,000 337,000 474,854 350,767 2,422,000 1,083,100 2,392,477 1,038,621 264,790 63,895 229,200 222,084 604,268 555,205 61,700 76,486 665,965 631,691 105,000 110,890 105,000 110,890 196,000 174,245 131,543 2,686,790 1,083,100 2,456.372 1,170,164 (39,200) 17,495 938 (39,200) 18,433 150,000 117,322 6,816 6,816 416,000 235,697 150,000 416,000 117,322 235,697 196,000 229,911 65,000 167,384 26-20 396,322 398,121 690,966 694,703 14,000 48,037 32,388 14,000 80,425 1,678 1,678 900,000 777,252 12,774 7,500 912,774 784,752 241,879 246,985 15,220,364 15,220,364 15,313,796 15,310,186 5,538,432 5,538,432 8,661,167 8,659,305 4,162,113 4,101,606 394,090 357,124 4,556,203 4,458,730 1,483,618 1,472,185 222,720 205,937 1,706,338 1,678,122 3,565,259 3,221,137 652,774 647,500 4,218,033 3,868,637 2,935,879 2,935,135 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 14. Missouri River New Work: Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA 15. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 16. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 17. Pebble Creek Scribner, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 18. Perry Creek, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. 2/ Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 88,000 88,349 151,900 188,774 4,600 17,413 156,500 206,187 18.070 5,857 23,927 615,000 605,775 59,000 57,132 587,500 281,129 55,890 11,733 643,390 292,862 1,091 1,091 593.000 581,127 3,221 38,000 145,555 41,152 145,685 266,500 606,611 170,947 183,621 437,447 790,232 6,453 6,453 50,000 49,949 10,490 50,000 51,439 11,294,414 1 1294,414 5,166,974 5,166,974 1,368,600 1,353,371 359,887 336,736 1,728,487 1,690,107 - 66,612,215 2i 2,040 66,605,606 21 - 955,000 - 884,680 - 67,567,215 2,040 67,490,286 532,000 598,822 552,855 599,595 547 444 3,665 547 4,650,000 3,424,000 4,850,900 2,516,925 400,000 86,625 4,650,000 3,824,000 4,850,900 2,603,550 258 258 10,265,266 10264,015 2,725,728 2,716,954 435,656 419,880 3,161,384 3,136,834 6,235,237 13,900,000 35,431,485 6,799,322 13212,961 34,312,672 850,000 642,718 1,023,819 608,778 7,085237 14,542,718 7,823,141 13,821,739 1,892,718 1,719,222 37,324,203 36,031,894 26-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 20. Pipestem Lake, New Work: 21. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 23. Thurman to Hamburg, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 24. Van Bibber Creek, CO Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 25. Wood River, Grand Island, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 26. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects ND 619,000 617,114 Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Funding New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. 561,000 580,000 539,598 608,744 757,000 728,000 750,354 741,767 (30237) 6,000 (26,281) 598,307 597,556 725,646 725,776 26,028 26 81 26,028 (30237) 6,000 - 216,000 252,741 1,030 355,000 216,000 261,285 252,741 1,000,000 309,037 100.000 309,037 253,000 251,864 50,200 77,715 50200 77,515 246,744 112,226 246,744 112,226 238,000 224,000 231,759 232,590 (7,200) 10,401 (7,200) 10,401 386,000 409,029 386,000 409,029 160,269 160,371 9,277,545 9,277,545 8,837,711 8,836,641 12,197,621 31/ 12,197,621 1/ 16,664,922 16,663,883 1,040,763 1,040,763 397,587 397,587 1,438,350 1,438,350 1,066,589 1,047,916 125,200 125,200 1,191,789 1,173,116 1,386,000 1,077,036 1,386,000 1,077,036 5,617,745 5,617,203 3/ Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status 26-22 778,000 772,287 360,000 399,998 157,000 294,218 517,000 694,216 355,000 261,285 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 29. Boyer Chute, NE (Mo Riv Bank.. Stab/Nay) Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 30. California Bend, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 31. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and State of SD Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration, SD 32. Hidden Lake/ Great Marsh. NE Required Contributed Consolidated Summary 33. Lower Decatur, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. 470,000 334,000 372,000 473,101 374,993 374,993 2,898 6 2,904 16,000 24,499 16,000 24,499 359,000 377295 102,000 137,075 461.000 514,370 20,000 9,806 20,000 9,806 137,000 136,570 137,000 136,570 200 61,843 62,043 263,000 307,000 166,005 351,728 268.000 307,000 166,005 351,728 20,000 12,663 20,000 12,663 35,000 30,543 35,000 30,543 15,0oo 8,126 15,794 15,000 23,920 100,000 135,983 100,000 135,983 26-23 345,996 348,525 398,901 402,611 9,762,680 9,762,415 2,178,401 2,163,127 82,000 81,993 398,901 402,611 200,495 192,614 200,495 192,614 2,500,000 893,862 15,000 12,600 (1,358) 15,000 11,242 205.000 178,845 205.000 178,845 2,260,401 2,245,120 645,995 631,831 645,995 631,831 2,500,000 893,862 2,236,000 2225,865 650,000 641,191 2,886,000 2,867,056 880,000 836,334 880,000 836,334 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 34. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, MO 35. Nathan's Lake/ Deer Creck Aquatic Habitat Improvement, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 36. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Required Contributed Funds 37. Consolidated Summary Funds Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 38. Fort Peck Lake, MT 39. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. 1,584,000 1,374,000 4,070,000 1,208,461 1,603,873 3,374,515 95,000 71,192 95,000 71,192 30,000 52,102 50,000 30,196 80,000 83,018 110,000 171,000 1328,000 123 269 158,912 1,270323 506,000 303,376 110,000 171,000 1,834,000 123,269 158,912 1,573,699 5,692300 7,121,300 6,035,000 5,595,713 6,623,326 6,667,015 3,459,000 4,141,000 4,391,000 3,469,804 4,891,338 4,505,403 8,943,500 9,118,000 7,844,000 9,149,872 8,887,964 8,147,631 4,700,000 4,258,705 135.000 19,178 18,241 135.000 37,419 273,000 349,497 94,000 223,616 367,000 573,113 6,515,756 6,479,037 4,031,141 4,078,081 26,963,000 25,592,241 260,000 142,472 50,000 49,157 310,000 191,629 1,947,000 1,946,785 600,000 526,992 2,547,000 2,473,777 107,497,597 107,497,597 122,151,329 A 122,103,592 A 158,428,080 158,428,080 104,700,975 A/ 104,692,597 4/ 199,065,883 199,065,883 7,968,478 187,039,612 4/ 7,963,253 187,023,837 4 4/ Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 26-24 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 40 & 41. Garrison Dam Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND Federal Funds Maint Approp. Cost. 8,491,000 7,540,000 9,050,000 8,113,054 7,942,739 9,165,548 8,063,896 201,393,569 41 8,060,510 201,386,251 _/ 1,035,000 4,500,000 555,288 4,424,506 42. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 43. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND 44. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam MT & Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE 45. Pierre, SD 46. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. 49,617,239 49,617,239 5,933,500 6227,000 6.984,000 5,931,717 5,965,884 7,336,181 5,889,002 137,764,414 4 5,908,727 137,748,753 41 346,520,603 346,520,603 9,148,000 11,669,200 10,685,000 9246,349 10,292,662 12,081,727 735,000 242223 737,000 2,183,000 1,528,412 2,385,152 -- 340,000 - -- 339,82 2,549,000 1,800,000 1,863,000 2,566,603 1,810,941 1,814,557 12.236271 210,871,97141 12,253,913 210,846,74741 227,000 285,554 7,500,000 6,009,111 669,109 662,650 6,882,000 6,881,668 7,840,000 6,348,393 23,979,109 S 23,924,207 5 4/ Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 5/ Included in the Mscellaneous Section of the Text. 26-25 New Work: Approp. Cost. 295,729,613 295,729,613 Major Rehab: Approp. Cost. Required Contributed Funds 374,000 356,271 Approp. Cost. 8,500,000 5,558,299 18,617310 15,102,674 686,961 686,961 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Jan 12, 1927 Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). July 3, 1930 Appropriation of $ 15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and 59,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. Aug 30, 1935 For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. Mar 2, 1945 For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 Flood Control Act of 1948 Aug 13, 1968 Water Resources Development Act Of 1996 5. ABERDEEN & VICINITY, SD Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BIG SIOUX RIVER AND SKUNK CREEK, SIOUX FALLS, SD A flood control project for raising levees and diversion dams, modification of chute and stilling basin, and providing bridge improvements. S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 Section 101 P.L. 104-303 Flood Control Act of 1962 Section 336(a) Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood Control reservoir and water supply. H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ND (LAND ACQUISTION) CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exempt prohibition of encroachment for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 26-26 6. 8. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 10. 11. 12. 13. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan. Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs. SD. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER NE Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended, flood damage reduction MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam. NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike. revetments. H. Doe. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 95-625 H. Doe. 821,76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. Authorized additional S4.8 million for channel improvement on Big Papillon Creek, and to Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. PERRY CREEK, IA Provide flood protection for Perry Creek, Iowa. H. Doe. 349, 90th Cong. PL 90-485 H. Doec. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 858, 80th Cong. Section 401 a, PL 99-662 26-27 NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18. 1965 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 19. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown. ND and downstream areas. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River basin and authonzed $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional S200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Authorized $5.384.014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir. KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional S116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Darn and Reservoir. ND. Authorized additional S101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 26-28 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. PL 75-761 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. P. L. 85-500 P.L 86-645 P. L. 88-253 P. L. 89-042 P. L. 90-483 H. Doe. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895 P. L. 91-282 S. Doe. 91-1100, 91st Cong. P. L. 91-576 H. Doe. 91-23 and P. L. 91-611 P. L. 92-222 P. L. 93-251 P.L. 94-347 P.L. 95-189 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. P.L. 89-298 20. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents July 3,. 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 Jul 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized S26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional S 12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional 521 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional S37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional S22 million for prosecution of plan. Authonzed additional S3 million for prosecution of plan. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Install pumping facilities to prevent flooding in the Thurman to Hamburg area of the Missouri River in western Fremont County, IA. H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. P.L. 85-500 H Doc. 669, 80th Cong. P.L. 81-516 P.L. 90-17 P.L. 90-843 P.L. 91-282 P.L. 92-222 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 94-347 P.L. 95-189 Section 1152 P. L. 99-662 Flood Control Act of 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1996 and 1999 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Water Resources Development Act of 1999 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction WOOD RIVER,GRAND ISLAND, NE Five-mile long diversion channel with levees. Section 101k P.L. 104-303 and and Section 335 P.L. 106-53 BOYER CHUTE, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. as amended: environmental improvement LOWER DECATUR, NE Section 1135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 26-29 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE AND STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA AND TERRESTRIAL WILDLFE HABITAT RESTORATION P.L. 106-53 Land transfer, mitigation and cultural work within the State of South Dakota REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authonzed Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and 1999 Water Resources Development Act Of 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Dec. 22, 1944 June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 PWA 1968 Dec. 22, 1944 MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, MO Mitigate fish and wildlife losses resulting from the con- Section 601(a), struction and operation of the Missouri River Bank PL 99-662 and Stabilization and Navigation project. Section 334, P.L. 106-53 35. Section 601(a), PL 99-662 and Section 334, P.L. 106-53 P. L. 99-662 NATHAN'S LAKE, NE Mitigate fish and wildlife losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. WEHRSPANN LAKE AQUATIC, NE Section 1 135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam. as recommended by Chief of Engineers Sep 30. 1933, was approved by Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program. Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance. and operation of a hydroelectric power plant. subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD & ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 26-30 34. H. Doe. 475 and S. Doe. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doe. 238, 73rd Cong. P .L. 74-409 P. L. 75-529 H. Doe. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P.L. 78-534 H. Doe. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 H. Doe. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40- 41. 42. 43. Dec. 22, 1944 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1988 Water Resources Development Act of 1999 MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM ,MT & GAVINS POINT DAM, SD & NE Undertake measures to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases along the Missouri River from the six main stem dams. PIERRE, SD Mitigation for flooding caused by the Oahe Dam Project to the cities of Pierre and Ft. Pierre, SD. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. Section 33, PL 100-676 P.L. 106-53 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 26-31 44. 45. 46. Dec 22, 1944 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projec Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missoun River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 26-32 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD 11 Complete 1940 37,410 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA 3/ Complete 1982 7,479,899 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE I/ Complete 1970 262,479 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE 2/ Complete 1974 293,016 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND -1 Complete 1960 102.980 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD z Complete 1981 3.000,000 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA 2/ Complete 1986 2,154,016 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435.000 Genng Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663 Glasgow. MT Complete 1939 16.832 Great Falls, MT Complete 1991 11.905.000 Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507 Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50.216 Hooper. NE 2/ Complete 1968 326,667 Ida Grove, IA 2/ Complete 1972 522.344 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA 2/ Complete 1986 333,000 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Complete 1950 Linton, ND 2/ Inactive 1973 Little Papillion Creek, NE Complete 1976 3,643,111 Little Sioux River, IA Complete 1992 20,630,000 Loup River, Columbus, NE 2 Complete 1973 1,000,000 Lower Heart River, ND Complete 1964 1,961,173 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND 1 Complete 1991 1,153,430 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks 21 Complete 1967 234,839 Mandan, Heart River, ND Complete 1960 676,916 Marmarth. ND Complete 1960 169,498 McCook Lake, SD Complete 1958 147,627 Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 1/ Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3/ Design Deficiency Correction initiated in FY00. 26-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missoun River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO Complete 1993 37,964,177 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 Mott, ND Defrred - - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE 21 Complete 1976 1,000,000 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236.000 Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504 Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640 Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597 Platte River Near Schuyler, NE I/ Complete 1948 74,940 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257398 Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,69 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Complete 1980 1,004,000 Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184380 Sheridan, WY 3/ Complete 1976 2,618,809 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT I1 Complete 1951 25,747 Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707 Vaughn, MT, Sun River 2 Complete 1971 457,582 Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883 West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230294 2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3/ Includes inactive segment 26-34 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam -Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 26-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Billings, MT (Western Unit) Boulder, CO Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY Giles Creek, Elkhom, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Lake Herman (Dredging), SD Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Milk River, Havre, MT Miles City, MT Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Oahe Dam -Lake Oahe (Wildlife Restoration), ND Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD 1976 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 N/A 1973 N/A 1982 1950 N/A 1966 Sec. 201. FC Act 1950 23 Mar 81 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 203, PL 90483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 See. 12. PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act of 1950 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12. PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 FC Act of 1970 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 26-36 75,000 142,666 135,000 282200 30,000 0 1,000 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND: James River, ND & SD;.Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin. NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD. Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT. South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin. ND; Shendan. WY (Stage III); Missoun River Levee System Units: R53 ,1 R540, R553. R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644. R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703. R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-G (continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Shell Creek, NE 1962 Sec. 12. PL 93-251 71,000 WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Upper Missouri River, SD N/A Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 Streambank Erosion Control Project WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 12 PL 93-251 208,000 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 The folowtng investiptions for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and commrnrntteere solutions were deauthonzed by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aows & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River ND; James River, ND A SD.,Judith River Basin, MT. Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE, South Dakota Lakm, SD; Weeping Water Creek. NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD, Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Misouri River Basin, ND; Shenrdan WY (Stage III); Miuoun River Levee System Units- R531, R540, R553, R555 R5577, R589, R603, R610. R623, R644. R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750 26-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TABLE 26-H Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 L601 L594 R580 L575 R573 R562 L561-550 R548 L536 R520 R613 R616 L611-614 L627, L624, L561-550 Comprehensive Mosquito Creek Levee Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees Pleasant Valley Levee Nebraska City Levee Thurman-Hamburg Levee Otto County Drainage District No. 2 Peru Dike Atchison County Levee District No. I Brownville-Nemaha Levee Mill Creek Levee Richardson County Drainage District No. 8 Papillion Creeck-Platte River Levee Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees Remedial Studies on Completed Units Restudy of Levee System 14.2 15.0 11.4 0.2 45.8 5.9 7.6 41.3 19.5 13.6 6.3 14.0 4.5 22.0 Complete 1950 Complete 1966 Complete 1964 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1960 Complete 1971 Complete 1987 Complete 1988 Studies Complete Studies Complete 26-38 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI RIVER BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 19 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT /, 1/ 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND /, 3/&/ 310,832,264 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE) 11 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND /., T 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD , 2/ 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD 1/, 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE 1/, 2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 2/ 13,516,000 Omaha, NE 2/ 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA L/ 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 2/ 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO 1/, / 15,220,000 285,000 11 Details presented on individual report. 2/ Completed. 3/ Active portion of project. 26-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (See Section 26 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Beaver Creek, Saco Sep 99 * Clyde Park, Shields River Sep 99 Glasgow, Milk River Nov 99 Havre, Milk River Oct 99 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Oct 99 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Oct 99 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Aug 00 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Aug 00 Sun River,Vaughn Oct 99 * Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Sep 99 Sun River, Great Falls Oct 99 * Milk River, Malta (Sewer Line) Oct 99 * Yellowstone River, Livingston (N.E. Livingston Bridge) Sep 99 * Milk River, Chinook (Finley Bridge) Oct 99 * Battle Creek, Chinook (Uhruh Bridge) May 99 * East Gallatin, Near Bozeman (Intst Bridge) Sep 99 * Yellowstone River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89 - 7 Miles East of Livingston) Sep 99 * Shields River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89) Sep 99 * Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) Oct 99 * Madison River, Quake Lake Sep 99 * Milk River, Malta Oct 99 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization Project. Frazer Sep 94 * Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek Oct 99 * Muddy Creek - Int Hwy 15 - Frontage Road, Vaughn Oct 99 * Badger Creek -Hwy 89, Browning Sep 99 Wyoming * Baldwin Creek. Lander (Sewage Lagoons) Sep 99 Greybull, Big Horn River Aug 00 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Aug 00 * Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Aug 92 * Shoshone River, Byron Oct 98 * Powder River, Arvada Oct 98 * Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain Jan 97 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Oct 99 Marmarth, Little Missouri River May 99 Scranton, Buffalo May 99 * Cannonball River Oct 97 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-40 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 26 of Text) Location Month Inspected South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Jun 00 Big Sioux River. North Sioux City Jun 00 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Jul 00 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Aug 99 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 99 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 99 Herreid, Spring Creek Aug 00 * Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Aug 00 * Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre * Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 00 * Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 99 * Missouri River. Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Aug 97 * Vermillion River, Vermillion May 00 * Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Jun 00 * Big Sioux River, Jefferson Jun 00 Deadman Gulch. Sturgis Aug 00 * MarneCreek, Yankton May 00 * White River, Winner Oct 96 * James River, Yankton Jun 00 * Missouri River, White Swan & Sunshine Bottoms Aug 98 * Big Sioux River. Plymouth County Jun 99 Colorado Aurora. Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Sep 00 * South Platte River, Kersey Aug 99 * South Platte River. Merino Sep 99 * South Platte River. Iliff Sep 99 * South Platte River. Platteville Sep 99 * Big Thompson River, Johnstown Aug 99 * Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Sep 96 * South Platte River. Fort Lupton Hwy 85 Aug 99 * South Platte River. Logan County (Bridges 175A & 173) Sep 99 * Downstream Chatfield. Denver Jun 99 Nebraska * Blackbird Creek. Burt County May 97 Omaha, Missouri River Oct 99 Waterloo, Elkhom River May 00 West Point, Elkhorn River May 99 Pierce. Elkhorn River May 00 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Aug 00 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jul 99 Norfolk, North Fork. Elkhom River May 00 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks May 00 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Sep 99 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Oct 97 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 26 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska (continued) Macy, Blackbird Creek May 99 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Mar 99 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 00 Columbus, Loup River Aug 99 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Aug 00 * Platte River, Brady Feb 95 * Elm Creek, Decatur Nov 98 * Nebraska City South Table Creek Jul 99 * Wigle Creek, Homer Dec 98 * South Elkhorn River, near Ewing, NE May 99 * Elk Creek, Jackson Dec 98 * Elk Creek, Willis Dec 98 Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 99 * Middle Pebble Creek. Snyder Nov 98 * Elm Creek, Burt County Apr 98 * Platte River, Camp Ashland Nov 98 * West Branch Papillion Creek. Omaha. NE Oct 99 * Logan Creek. Near Bancroft Dec 98 * Platte River, Near North Bend Aug 98 * Elkhom River, Near Beemer Nov 98 * East Bow Creek, Wynot Jun 99 * Cedar River, Spalding Aug 97 ** Ames Diking District near Ames Aug 98 * North Bend Diking District Aug 98 ** Cottrelle Diking District Jul 99 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Winslow Levee Jul 99 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Bowman, Zach, Roth Jul 99 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Peterson Jul 99 ** Clear Creek Diking District Jul 99 ** SID #1 Lake Waconda Jul 99 ** SID #97 Hawaiian Village Jun 00 ** SID #101 Hansen Lake Jun 00 ** PMRNRD Western Feb 98 ** PMRNRD Cape-L Str Oct 99 ** LPSNRD Omaha Fish Mar 00 ** PMRNRD Union Dike Sep 99 ** PMRNRD No Name Jul 99 ** Coming Levee Dist #2 Mill Creek D.D. May 00 ** Fremont Co. Bd. of Sup. Whitehead Levee Jul 99 * Lodgepole Creek, Sydney Sep 99 Gering Drain. Gering Sep 99 * Denotes Section 14 Projects * * Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-42 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26J (Continued) (See Section 26 of Text) Location Month Inspected Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Jul 00 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Aug 00 Sioux City, Floyd River Sep 00 Hawarden, Dry Creek Aug 99 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Dec 99 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 00 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 00 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 99 * West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Jul 99 * East Nisbnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex Jul 99 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Jul 00 * Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Dec 98 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Oct 99 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Sep 99 * Little Sioux River, Anthon Dec 98 * Keg Creek. Minden Jul 99 * Soldier River, Near Ute Sep 98 Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Oct 99 L60 1, Watkins Levee District Aug 00 L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Aug 00 L601, Missouri River Levee District # 1 Aug 00 L594, Waubansie Drainage District Apr 99 L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Apr 99 L575, Benton-Washington Levee District Mar 99 L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District Dec 99 L575. McKissock Island Levee District Dec 99 L575, Bucbannan Levee District Dec 99 L56 1, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District Aug 00 L611-614. M & P Missouri River Levee District Jul 00 R613, Papio Natural Resources District Oct 99 R548, Little Nemaha Levee District Aug 00 R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 Sep 99 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Sep 00 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Oct 99 R562, Peru Levee District Sep 99 R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District Aug 00 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 50 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 00 Subtotal and Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Reconnaissance Study (121) Indian Creek, Council Bluffs. IA 39,798 Feasibility Study (121) Chatfield, Cherry Creek & Bear Creek, CO 422 Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 151,601 Lower Platte River and Tribs., NE 518,305 Subtotal 710,126 Special Studies (140) None in FY 00 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Review of Completed Projects: Recon. Study (163) Chatfield, Cherry Creek & Bear Creek, CO 638 Oahe Lake Sharpe, SD 24 Review of Completed Project: Feasibility Study (164) Chatfield, Cherry Creek & Bear Creek 428,544 Subtotal 429,206 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (17 1) 165,453 FERC Licensing Activities (172) 2,335 Interagency Water Resources Development(173) 25,650 North American Waterfowl Management Plan(176) 4,735 Subtotal 198,173 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Cooperation With Other Water Resources Agencies (181) 22,790 Cooperation with States (186) 247.196 Subtotal 269,986 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,607,491 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) <90> Flood Plain Management, Omaha. NE 54.664 National Flood Proofing Cmet (NFPC) 5.161 Quick Responses (250) 6,008 SS -May Creek, Bismarck. ND 0 SS -Big Sioux River, Esteline. SD 2,980 SS - N. Fork, Elkhom River. CO 6,999 SS - Montgomery County, IA 6,016 SS -Polk, NE 3,914 SS - Heart River, Morton County. ND 0 SS - Winslow, NE, Nonstructural F.H. 16,721 SS - Glendive, MT 1224 SS - Parkston, SD 5,036 SS -Roundup, MT 4,896 Technical Services, General (250) 70,002 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrologic Studies (262) 40,643 TOTAL (Category 200) 224,174 26-44 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 50 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 00 Subtotal and Categories PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) Wood River, Grand Island, NE (451) Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD (451) Watertown and Vicinity, SD (451) Sand Croek Watershed, Wahoo, NE (451 ) Gregory County Hydroelectric Pumping Storage. SD (460) TOTAL (Category 400) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 120 189.598 70,736 5,403 45,000 310,857 2,142,522 26-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 28 of Text) Fiscal Year 00 Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness (100) 483,217 Emergency Operations (200) 223 Rehabilitation & Inspection Program (300) 713,117 Emergency Water Supplies & Drought Assistance (400) 0 Advance Measures (500) 553,454 Hazard Mitigation (600) 0- Support for Others 179,357 Total (FCCE) 1,929,368 Section 205: Logan Creek, Pender, NE C 48,037 Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD C 44,760 Maple Creek East Fork, Howells. NE C 482 Milk River, Malta, MT C 1,678 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA C 40,949 Pebble Creek. Scribner, NE C 258 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO P 10,401 Iowa & South Creeks, Ponca, NE F 660 Denison, IA F 99,574 Verdigre, NE F 43,952 Burt & Washington Counties, NE F 41,546 Livingston, MT F 30,229 Cold Brook Creek, Hot Springs, SD F 41,666 Sidney, NE C 10,512 Ponca Creek, Lynch, NE F 41,317 Heart River, Mandan, ND F 11,552 Mosquito Creek, Council Bluffs, IA F 6,295 Knife River, Beulah. ND F 12,306 Yellowstone River, Glendive, MT F 65,510 Crow Creek, Cheynne, WY F 5,508 Total (Section 205's) 557,192 Section 14: Little Missouri River, E. River Rd., Medora, ND C 3,120 James River Rd. (CR 213), SD C 16,333 Cache La Poudre. CO C 169,157 Coulson Park Landfill. Billings. MT C 353,044 Elk Creek, Lancaster County, NE PDA 27,841 Total (Section 14's) 569,495 Total Flood Control Activities S 3,056,055 L = Litigation R = Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility - - Does Not Apply PDA = Planning & Design Analysis (Section 14 only) 26-46 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-M ENVIRONMENTAL Modification of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest. (Includes Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended and Section 206, Public Law 104-303, as amended.) Fiscal Year 00 Fiscal Year 00 Study/Project and Location Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended Boyer Chute, NE 402,611 California Bend, NE 192,614 3,985 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe and State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration 893,862 Coordination Account Funds 34,844 Glenn Cunningham Lake, NE 56,581 Hidden Lake Restoration, NE 12.600 (1,358) Initial Appraisals, General, NE 20,305 Lower Decatur Bend, NE 178,845 Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS & ND 4,250,687 Missouri River Levee Unit L536 2,800 Nathan's Lake, NE 19,178 18,241 Plattesmouth Bend Chute, NE& 2,226 Upper Central Platte Valley (Colfax Reach), CO 524,733 Wehrspann, Lake Aquatic, NE 349,497 223,616 26-47 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT* The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) 2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation,IA,NE,KS, and MO Flood Control 3. Blue River Basin, Kansas City,MO 4. Blue River Channel, Kansas City,MO 5. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO 6. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull CreekKS 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River,KS 10. Little Blue River Lakes, MO 11. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO 12. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 14. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) 15. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 16. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) 17. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 18. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 19. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 20. Smithville lake, Little Platte River,MO 21. Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO 22. Tuttle Creek Lake,Big Blue River,KS 23. Wilson Lake, Saline River,KS 24. Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO 27. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO Page 27-2 27-2 Work Under Special Authorities 28. Continuing Authorities Program 29. Emergency Response Activities General Investigations 30. General Investigations 27-2 27-3 27-3 27-3 27-3 27-4 27-4 27-4 27-5 27-5 27-5 27-6 27-6 27-6 27-6 27-7 27-7 27-7 27-7 27-7 27-8 27-8 27-8 Other Activities 31. Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development 32. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program 33. Missouri River Basin Collaborative Water Resources, Planning/Partnering Process 34. Regulatory Program Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Table 27-K Work Under Special Authorities Continuing Authorities Program Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Emergency Response Activities Table 27-L Active General Investigations Table 27-M Regulatory Program 27-8 27-8 27- 1 27-9 27-10 27-10 27-10 27-10 27-10 27-11 27-12 27-16 27-22 27-23 27-25 27-29 27-30 27-31 27-33 27-34 27-34 27-34 27-36 27-38 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER,SIOUX CITY, IA,TO MOUTH (RULO,NE,TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the waterways, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facility. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance of dikes and revetments along the lower river was accomplished by contract. Field hired labor accomplished emergency construction of a flow control structure at the entrance of a newly formed chute. District personnel also 27- accomplished other work items: Channel reconnaissance, stream gauging condition studies, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Project tonnage on the river for CY 2000 is estimated at 8.0 million tons, excluding waterway improvement materials. District estimates the recreation use on the Missouri River (NWK) at 1.2 million recreation days annually. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, and MO Location. This project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river distance of 732 miles. This location is coincident with the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project. The four major components of the plan are restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands (2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands subject to the effects of riverbed degradation (700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated fully funded cost of the project (2000) is $85,400,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas City and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. Local cooperation. There is no non-Federal sponsor for the project. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team, which is actively involved in ongoing project activities. Operations during fiscal year. Funding was continued for land acquisition and construction of mitigation features. Land was purchased at Nishnabotna, Overton Bottoms, and Thurnau, Missouri. Design activities were carried out at the following: Louisville Bend, Iowa; Kansas Bend , Nebraska; Blackbird-Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; Overton Bottoms, Lower Hamburg, Eagles Bluff, Columbia Bottoms, and Worthwine Island, Missouri. Construction activities occurred at Tobacco Island and Langdon Bend, Nebraska; Derion Bend and Overton Bottoms, Missouri; and California Bend, Iowa. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the left bank of the Blue River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance of about 1-1/4 miles in Jackson County, Missouri, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee. 2 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Existing project. The recommended project includes construction of approximately 1-1/4 miles in Jackson County, Missouri, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee. Existing project. The recommended project includes construction of approximately 1-1/4 miles of levee to provide flood protection to 280 acres in the Dodson Industrial Area and surrounding area in Kansas City. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (2004) is $13,500,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands damages and relocations is $6,500,000. Funds were provided in FY 2001 for a new construction start. Local Cooperation. The city of Kansas City provided a letter of assurance, dated November 17, 1995, officially stating its intent to cost share the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design continued with preparation of the design memorandum and plans and specifications. 4. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing Project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (2000) is $220,000,000, and estimated non- Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $32,500,000. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Kansas City District Engineer signed the Section 221 agreement on September 8, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. All work on stages I and 2 has been completed. The Stage 3 reach of the project consists of four construction contracts. The 12-19* Street contract is complete. The 19h to Stadium Drive construction contract is nearing completion. The Plans and Specifications for the remaining two contracts have been initiated. Railroad alteration contracts in the Stage 3 reach with the Kansas City Southern and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Companies have been completed. One Union Pacific Railroad bridge has been completed and the design of the remaining three bridges is underway. 5. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. The authorized project consists of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified project was built which provides identical flood protection, but which also accommodates park and recreation development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded Federal cost of the modified project (1996) is $14,464,000; and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and cash is $19,526,000. Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City and the Corps of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on the project in March 1991. Operations during fiscal year. The dedication of the project was in June 1995. The project was turned over to the local sponsor in January 1997. 6. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. The lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 7,103,248 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 1-1/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near the center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost 27- 3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. The project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 7,006,522 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Study of future operation. We continued coordination efforts with the Bureau of Reclamation and continued as a cooperating agency and providing input to BOR's Republican River Basin Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). A team comprised of District and BOR representatives developed a Consensus Operation Plan (Plan) for use of the sediment storage at Harlan County Lake for incorporation in the Republican River EIS. The Plan resolved a decades-old issue between the two agencies and the district and completed the Technical Report addressing the impacts of the Plan that was incorporated into the EIS. The Division Engineer signed a Record of Decision on July 25, 2000 adopting the Republican River EIS for Harlan County Lake. We continue to maintain our coordination with BOR. We also continue to respond to requests from the Department of Justice (DOJ) on the Kansas and Nebraska lawsuit on the Republican River Compact. 8. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 2'/2 miles west of Hillsdale, in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974, and the project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $21,145,338 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has s 50-year lease on 12,880 acres for management of land and water areas for public park, recreational, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 1,931,380 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 9. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the Smoky Hill River about 184 river miles above the mouth of the stream, and about 11 miles northwest of Marquette, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940, and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 1,768,704 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKESMO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about 2 mile south of U,S. Highway 40, and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109"' Street. Existing Project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acrefeet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Federal cost (1992) for both lakes through construction of the project was $140,809,200. Construction was initiated in September 1977, and the project became operational in September 1988 Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28,1938 applies. Local interest must share in separable costs allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County 27- 4 Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974, which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Reimbursement for recreation was $15,047,000 of which $450,000 was accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Project is complete. Land acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 2000 was 3,203,673 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. The Damsite is on the East Fork Little Chariton River in north central Missouri about 2 miles west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in the right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1997) is $20,288,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,605,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. The project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,589,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri State agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of the City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to this contract was approved December 28, 1993 to provide for additional recreational facilities. Additional facilities have been designed Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 1,492,716 visitor hours. Project is 100 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining unscheduled work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Project storage was reallocated in 1989 to include municipal and industrial water supply in accordance with provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958. In accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Kansas and the Department of the Army dated 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was made in March 1995. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in September 1993 under an interim contract and continues under the current contract signed in January 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 6,594,953 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and resurfacing outlet road. 13. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. The Damsite is on the Republican River near the village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project at the request of the Governor of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. The project was placed in operation in June 1965. 27- 5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $12,162,134 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1984. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 5,646,084 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 14. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM IA, NE, KS AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to the mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. The portion of the project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated fully funded (2000) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $148,496,000, including $107,174,000 Federal and $20,135,000 non-Federal contributions, and costs of $21,187,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Current cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $168,865,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $153,233,000 is Federal cost for construction and $15,632,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Unit L385 was approved for construction in FY 1994. Planning on Unit L142 continued. The Project Cooperation Agreement on Unit L385 was executed September 23,1997. 15. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER Location. The Damsite is on the Delaware River about 5 miles above the mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles northwest of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project plan at the request of the State of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $8,551,805 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1991. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 6,018,153 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 16. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 17. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. The dam is on the main stem Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above the mouth in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extends upstream into Polk County, Missouri. The site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the complete project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. 27- 6 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 16,967,502 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. The dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including $731,130 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $862,923. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 3,035,557visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. The Damsite is on the Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and I mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acrefeet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 5,383,605 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. The Damsite is on the Little Platte River about I mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non- Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 6,835,372 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO Location: The Turkey Creek Basin is a 23-square mile area within Kansas City, KS and suburbs in Johnson and Wyandotte Counties in Kansas. Existing Project. The recommended project is estimated to cost $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000, including construction of channel modification and tributary flood water diversion. Local Cooperation. Latest evidence of sponsor support for design and construction was execution of the Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) agreement on 29 March 1999. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 27- 7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 22. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the main stem of the Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the stream mouth in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (ode 710), was $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in Operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 2,654,356 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 23. WILSON LAKE,SALINE RIVER,KS Location. The dam is on the Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near the eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low-flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961, and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 2,165,029 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity included ordinary operation and maintenance. 24. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. Fiscal Year costs were $293,000. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, Osage River, MO Location. The Damsite is on the main stem of the Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with a combined generating capability of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). The operating purposes of the project are flood control, hydroelectric power, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $550,909,000. Construction of relocated Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The project was operational for flood control in October 1979, and multipurpose pool was reached in November 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearings required remedial repair that was completed in FY 1999. Through September 2000, power generation totaled 5,446,223,000- kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $124,661,472 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 10,531,867 visitor hours. Project is complete. During FY 2000, 86,141,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and completion of turbine repair. 77- R KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 27. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. The Damsite is on the Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with the Osage River, and about 1 mile east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri. The lake extends into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, ---- with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). The authorized project purposes are flood control, hydroelectric power, water quality, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $79,975,357. Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000-kilowatt level. Rightof- way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend were acquired, and construction completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills were acquired. Completion assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 2000 power generation totaled 1,679,260,000 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $34,672,925 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 2000 was 7,516,896 visitor hours. The project is complete and in operational status. During FY 2000, 23,141,000 kilowatthours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Work Under Special Authorities 28. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80" Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $7 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects are required to pay 50 percent of all feasibility study costs over $100,000. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 35 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 2000. See Table K for expenditures under Section 205 during 2000. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79' Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineering feasible, economically justifiable environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than $1,000,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. Construction was completed on three projects in FY 2000 as follows: West Creek, Topeka, KS, Hinkson Creek, Columbia Sewer Main, MO, and West Fork Grand River, Route W, Roadway. MO. Projects were completed and turned over to the sponsors. See Table 27-K for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during FY 2000. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99 th Cong., November 17, 1986). 27- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Section 1135 authorizes review of the operation of completed water resources projects to determine need for modifications for the purpose of improving environmental quality. No projects were completed in FY 2000. See Table 27-K for Section 1135 studies status and expenditures for FY 2000. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206, Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Public Law 303, 104t" Cong., October 12, 1996). Section 206 authorizes small aquatic ecosystem restoration projects to improve the quality of the environment if in the public interest and cost effective. No projects were completed in FY 2000. See Table 27-K for Section 206 Studies status and expenditures for FY 2000. 29. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES A. Disaster Preparedness Program. The Disaster Preparedness Program (DPP) involves planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment, and personnel. Planning activities involve development of District response and recovery plans in support of natural disasters. Current plans include the Flood Fight Plan, Emergency Operations Center, Plan, Emergency Alerts and Dismissal Plan, Emergency Operations and Disaster Assistance - Deployment Plan.. Training activities to support disaster preparedness this year included flood fight training, refresher and alternate team member of the District's Emergency Water Planning and Response Team. The District identified and trained two members of the NWD Logistics Emergency Response Team (LERT) during the third quarter of FY 00. Disaster preparedness includes maintaining the necessary supplies and equipment to support disaster response. To support flood-fighting efforts , an inventory is maintained of over 1.4 million sandbags 40 pumps and sandbag filling machines. During this FY funding was received to maintain, repair and upgrade all flood fighting equipment. Response operations included deploying personnel to SPD, Albuquerque District to support the Los Alamos Wildfire recovery missions received from FEMA and the Department of Energy. Continued prolonged drought conditions over the Midwest resulted in request from the Kickapoo Nation in Horton, Kansas for technical assistance in supplying water for the reservation. A site investigation was performed, a project information report with recommended assistance alternative identified and forwarded to higher headquarters and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. The District has received approval to provide assistance with a pumping operation to insure adequate water supply to the Kickapoo's for an additional year. B. Public Law 84-99. Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works. Work continued on several federal levees damaged from 1999 events.. C. Catastrophic Disaster Response Planning. New Madrid/Cascadia. (1) NWK participated in a New Madrid Earthquake exercise held at Fort Riley, Kansas. The New Madrid OPLAN was up-dated to incorporate the initiatives of Readiness 2000. The OPLAN will be published in the near future. (2) NWK completed Volume 1, Part 9 of the Cascadia OPLAN. NWK received a New Mission Statement from NWD. NWK was tasked to develop Volume H, Part 9 of the Cascadia OPLAN. This OPLAN outlines duties and responsibilities of NWK in the event that NWS becomes a "VICTIM Command" and is declared non-mission capable. The OPLAN is in draft form and is essentially ready for review by the district staff. (3) NWK will participate in an internal and external NWD tabletop exercise this calendar year. 30. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 2000 costs totaled $1,756,642 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-L, which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data and Preconstruction Engineering and Design expenditures in FY 2000. Other Activities 31. MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM No activity within this appropriation this fiscal year. 32. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM FY 2000 expenditures of $97,600 provided for activities required for local and national preparedness. 33. MISSOURI RIVER BASIN COLLABORATIVE WATER RESOURCES, PLANNING/ PARTNERING PROCESS Missouri River Basin Association and the Corps will manage and facilitate the process of collaboration for some limited studies. The collaborative effort allows input from the states, tribes, and Federal agencies economic and environmental interest groups and the general public on both the operation issues, i.e. Master Manual, and nonoperational issues. In addition, the collaborative process could address recreation industry development, ecosystem 27 - 10 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT management, streambank erosion, project mitigation, structural changes for endangered species, environmental monitoring tribal water rights, and support to navigation and agriculture. Fiscal Year costs were $13,500. 34. REGULATORY PROGRAM Statutes. The Corps of Engineers is charged with protecting the public interest in all waters of the United States, including wetlands. This is accomplished through a Department of the Army permit program pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Operations during Fiscal Year 2000. Kansas City District completed 2,733 permit actions during the year. Of the 114 violations reported and evaluated this year, 111 were resolved by permits, voluntary restoration, administrative action or other means. Special projects or emphases during the year included continued review of dredging data for all commercial dredgers on the Kansas River (18 sites); completed development of a wetland mitigation bank in Johnson County, Kansas; entered into two merged NEPA/Section 404 applications for Federal Highway Administration/Kansas Department of Transportation projects; completed two merged NEPA/Section 404 applications for Federal Highway Administration/Missouri Department of Transportation projects; completed and issued a general permit for activities at the Lake of the Ozarks; completed agency coordination and issued regional conditions in Kansas and Missouri for the Nationwide Permit Program; established State Regulatory Offices in Jefferson City, Missouri and El Dorado, Kansas; continued the transition of moving the workload from the District office to the field offices under the "Full Service Field Office: concept; implemented a new Appeals Program in regulatory which resulted in two cases being appealed to the Division Engineer; provided a Regulatory IV wetland delineation training class for regional federal and state agencies. Fiscal Year costs totaled $2,500,896.84 for all regulatory activities. See Table M that shows expenditures for Permit Evaluation, Enforcement, and Administrative Appeals. 27- 11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 1. Missouri River, New Work: Sioux City, IA Approp. to Mouth (Rulo, Cost NE, to Mouth) Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Contributed Fundt New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Missouri River Fis New Work: & Wildlife Mitigatk Approp. IA, NE,KS & MO Cost 3. Blue River Basin New Work: Kansas City, MO Approp. Cost 4. Blue River Chann, New Work: Kansas City, MO Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contributed Fund. New Work: Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost 5. Brush Creek, New Work: Kansas City, MO Approp- (Federal Funds) Cost Expanded Project New Work: Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost 6. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 237,942,190 1/ 237,942,190 1/ 4,370,000 5,394,000 1/ 5,006,345 5,499,400 4,919,000 5,385,141 5,460,000 342,839,774 21 5,460,505 342,839,774 2/ 816,190 816,190 22,642 22,642 238,758,380 1/ 238,758,380 1/ 4,370,000 5,394,000 4,919,000 5,460,000 342,862,416 2/ 5,006,345 5,499,400 5,385,141 5,460,505 342,662,416 3/ 1,734,000 2,950,000 2,494,000 5,462,000 26,592,000 1,860,790 2,917,728 2,426,721 5,509,102 26,492,179 312,000 309,974 558,000 537,624 323,000 340,417 7,623,000 23,224,000 38,357,000 7,598,503 23,229,700 38,339,550 - -1,000,000 1,597,981 1,909,237 523,944 294,000 1,494,000 298,719 1,493,648 10,002,000 163,345,171 8,705,818 162,009,485 - 6,738,041 155,295 6,100,189 ~I 7,623,000 22,224,000 38,357,000 10,002,000 170,083,212 9,196,484 25,138,937 38,863,494 8,861,113 168,109,674 51 176,000 196,529 -25,027 176,000 171,502 15,880 -819,998 117,582 -819,998 133,462 3,684 765,000 333,510 765,000 337,194 - 14,390,000 39 14,373,158 - 7,776,002 438,384 8,121,423 - 22,166,002 438,423 22,494,581 _1 57,415,433 57,415,433 I 1,374,000 1,498,000 2,464,000 1,517,000 28,152,000 1,391,356 1,493,154 2,469,000 1,517,000 28,152,000 27 - 12 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-A DI18 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 7. Harlan County New Work: Lake, Republican Approp. River, NE 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 47,111,926 47,111,926 1,477,000 1,502,000 1,860,000 2,309,000 38,253,984 1,449,128 1,528,992 1,867,001 2,309,000 38,253,984 - - - 1,017,623 - - - 1,017,623 - - - 64,161,400 - - - 64,161,400 774,000 978,231 773,000 773,114 887,000 887,000 905,000 14,158,870 905,000 14,158,870 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 10. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11. Long Branch Lake New Work: Little Chariton Approp. River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed New Work: Funds Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost 12. Melvem Lake New Work: Osage (Marais de Approp. Cygnes) River, K% Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Milford Lake, New Work: Republican River, Approp. KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 12,577,227 - -- - 12,577,227 91 1,524,000 1,266,000 1,280,000 1,255,000 35,653,312 1,644,406 1,292,359 1,282,500 1,255,000 35,653,312 S-- -- 140,809,200 - - -- 140,809,200 S 715,000 741,235 787,000 771,000 789,435 771,000 936,000 10,697,784 936,000 10,697,784 18,216,177 18,216,177 736,000 697,100 f-- 1,348 1,348 834,000 835,000 877,245 835,000 814,000 12,798,112 814,000 12,798,112 1,139,455 1,139,332 11 19,355,509 19,355,509 - - - 37,436,530 - - - 37,436,530 1,623,000 1,611,000 1,846,000 1,957,000 33,423,154 1,606,853 1,631,492 1,846,000 1,957,000 33,423,154 49,566,492 49,566,492 4,594,000 1,622,000 2/ 1,818,000 4,413,833 1,812,038 4/ 1,818,000 1,896,000 43,815,940 1,896,000 43,815,940 27- 13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY: TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 14. Missouri River New Work: Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO Approp. Cost 298,000 249,182 907,000 1,375,000 2,926,000 70,586,851 859,101 1,451,985 2,900,539 70,525,374 15. Perry Lake, New Work: Delaware River, K Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17. Pomme de Terre New Work: Lake, Pomme de Approp. Terre River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18. Pomona Lake, Or New Work: Hundred Ten Mile Approp. Creek, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19. Rathbun Lake, New Work: Chariton River, Approp. IA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20. Smithville Lake, New Work: Little Platte Approp. River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21. Tuttle Creek Lake New Work: Big Blue Approp. River, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 49,095,918 - - - 49,095,918 1,757,000 1,768,000 1,902,000 1,984,000 41,703,343 1,758,054 1,771,291 1,902,000 1,984,000 41,703,343 17,365,452 17,365,452 1,849,000 1,721,000 1,824,000 1,948,282 39,754,743 1,850,621 1,736,822 1,824,000 1,948,282 39,754,743 -- - 14,003,238 14,003,238 1,704,000 1,564,000 1,786,000 1,667,064 35,739,134 1,698,224 1,572,043 1,786,000 1,667,064 35,739,134 27,622,159 27,622,159 1,928,000 1,928,000 2,162,000 2,045,000 45,919,211 1,948,639 1,918,090 2,179,433 2,045,000 45,919,211 87,685,314 87,685,314 969,000 1,051,859 1,012,000 1,071,000 989,947 1,102,637 944,000 19,115,848 944,000 19,115,848 80,584,079 80,584,079 3,306,000 1,956,000 1,938,000 3,448,551 2,094,153 4/ 1,938,000 2,283,000 45,797,232 2,282,000 45,796,232 22. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23. Scheduling Flood Maint. Control Reservoir Approp. Operations Cost 20,463,367 20,463,367 1,382,000 1,301,000 1,698,000 1,551,000 32,663,604 1,341,516 1,346,829 1,698,000 1,551,000 32,663,604 308,000 308,000 323,000 323,000 27- 14 301,000 301,000 293,000 57,521,452 293,000 57,521,452 NSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-A See Section in Text Project Funding 24. Inspection of Maint. Completed Flood Approp. Control Projects Cost 25. Harry S. Truman New Work: Dam & Reservoir Approp. Osage River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 521,000 517,635 -935 583,000 586,365 426,000 426,000 401,500 10,002,931 401,500 10,002,931 550,909,000 550,908,965 7,833,000 8,954,000 6,948,000 7,063,583 131,361,745 7,650,016 9,162,409 6,991,712 7,063,583 131,361,745 - - - 79,975,357 - - - 79,975,357 3,467,000 3,042,000 4,096,000 3,200,810 65,867,969 3,096,906 3,516,862 4,144,023 3,200,810 65,867,969 30. Mississippi River Maint. Main Stem Model Approp. Development Cost 31. National Emergen Maint. Preparedness Approp. Program Cost 32. Missouri River Ba. New Work: Collaborative Approp. Effort Cost 50,000 49,659 174,500 174,065 229,000 228,717 90,000 341 90,000 104,000 104,435 100,000 99,602 1. Includes $8,665,595 cost of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes funds appropriated under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo NE to Mouth, $40,000; and Milford Lake, KS, $40,000 4. Includes funds expended under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo NE to Mouth, $1,119,854; Milford Lake, KS, $45.526; and Tuttle Creek Lake, KS, $53,087. 5. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for 90,000 85,000 75,000 75,681 92,600 3,920,950 97,600 3,920,950 13,500 13,500 417,500 417,500 7. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not authorized Clinton Lake project (1973-1979). 8. Excludes cost of materials furnished Harlan Cou project without charge in the amount of $24,198 9. Excludes cost of materials furnished Kanopolis t without charge in the amount of $7,885. 10. Excludes $2,732,554 thru FY 1990 non-Federe not required for authorized Little Blue Lakes prn 11. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest du at Long Branch Lake project, and $500,000 wi authorized Blue River Channel project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984-1987). 6. Corps is building Brush Creek Expanded Project requested by sponsor, City of Kansas City, MO, with all costs of betterments and enhancements not required by authorized project funded by sponsor. Excludes sponsor's contributions of $2,548,121 for I PED (FWKCM) 1987 through 1997; 1 Park Features Design; $1,071,274 for Water Pollution Control di 27 - 15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS AC ES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 27-B See Section Date of AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) 1. Jul 25, 1912 Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to (contains latest published mouth. map). P.L. 241-62 Aug 8, 1917 Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., Quindaro Bend (274.8 miles from mouth) and provic (contains latest published for dredging. map). Mar 3, 1925 For a minimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, P.L. 585-68 with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Jan 12,1927 Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, P.L. 560-70 Quindaro Bend, and Sioux City, IA. Jul 3, 1930 Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; P.L. 67-73 additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of H.R. 11781 National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and P.L. 520-71 $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Aug 30, 1935 Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 Mar 2, 1945 Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., minimum width of 300 feet. (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79 2. Nov 17, 1986 3. Oct 12,1996 MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, MO, KS, IA & NE Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses Title VI, Section 601(a), Missouri River Bank Stabalization and Navigation Water Resources Develop- Project, MO, KS, IA & finE: April 24, 1984, Report a ment Act of 1986, P.L. Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost of 99-662. $51,900,000. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control along the left bank of the Blue Title I, Section 101(a), Water River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance Resources Development of about 1 1/4 miles in Jackson County, MO, to the Act of 1996, P.L. 104-303 Bannister Federal Complex levee: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Sep 5, 1996, at a total cost of $17,082,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,043,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,039,000. 27-16 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO 4. Dec 31, 1970 Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO 5. Nov 17, 1986 Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of Sec. 401(a), Water Resources the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estin Development Act of 1986, total cost of $16,100,000. P.L. 99-662 Nov 28, 1990 Modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army to Water Resources Development construct the project substantially in accordance witl Act of 1990, P.L. 101-640. the Post Authorization Change Report, dated April 1989 (revised January 1990), at a total cost of $26,200,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS 6. Oct 23, 1962 The project for the Kansas River, KS,NE and CO is 1962 Flood Control Act, H. Doc authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. 578, 87th Cong. P.L. 87-874. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN, NE 7. Jun 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Riv Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and par 75th Cong., P.L. 761. accomplishment. Aug 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harla H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE P.L. 77-228 other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenc and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS 8. Sep 3, 1954 The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amen 549, 81st Cong. and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS 9. June 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Riv Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and par 7th Cong., P.L. 761. accomplishment. Aug 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harla H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE P.L. 77-228 other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. 27 - 17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS A Y 2000 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenc and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO 10. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $38 million for prosecution of general comp P.L. 90-483, H. Doc. 169, hensive plan for Missouri River Basin 90th Cong. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO 11. Oct 27, 1965 The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Li 1965 Flood Control Act Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is autho P.L. 89-298, H. Doc. 238, at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. 89th Cong MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS 12. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Docs. 642, 549 1/ Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional and 561, 81st Cong.; expenditure. 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS 13. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 549 11, 81st Cong.; Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional P.L. 780 expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS AND MO 14. Aug 18,1941 Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to H. Doc 821, 76th Cong. Kansas City. P.L. 77-228 Dec 22, 1944 Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and H. Doc 475 and S. Docs. provided for increased protection. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS 15. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Docs. 642, 549 1/, and 561, Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expei 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 16. Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22,1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DISTRICT) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Riv Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and par 75th Cong. accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harla H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE P.L. 77-228 other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. and 247, 78th Cong. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 27- 18 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Docs. 642 and 549 1/ Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., expenditure. P.L. 780 May 2, 1956 Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Jul 3, 1958 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Jul 14, 1960 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. May 12, 1967 Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Dec 24, 1970 Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. Missouri River Basin Program. Dec 23, 1971 Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO 17. Jun 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Riv Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and par 75th Cong., P.L. 761. accomplishment. Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenc and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 642, 549 1/, and 561, Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expei 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS 18. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 549 1/, 561, 81st Cong.; Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expei 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 27- 19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS At 2000 TABLE 27-B See Section Date of AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA 19. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 561, 81st Cong., Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expel 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO 20. Oct 27, 1965 The project for flood protection on the Platte River an( 1965 Flood Control Act, tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimate' P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, of $26,889,000. 89th Cong.) 21. Aug 17, 1999 TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO Project for flood control at the lower reaches of Turke) Title I Section 101(a) Water Basin in Kansas City, KS and Kansas City, MO. RE Resources Development Act the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a tot of 1999, P.L. 106-53 of $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 22. Jun 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Riv Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and par 75th Cong., P.L. 761. accomplishment. Aug 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harla H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE P.L. 77-228 Dec 22, 1944 23 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 14, 1960 2/ 26. Sep 3, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenc & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 645 WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenc & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., P.L. 645 general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 549 11, 81st Cong.; Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expel 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby mosified in 1962 Flood Control Act, accordance with recommendations of the Chief of H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an estimat P.L. 87-874 additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. 27 - 20 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 27. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri R H. Doc. 549 1/, 81st Cong.; Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expei 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 1/ Contains latest published mr of Missouri River 2/ Report ot Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). 27 - 21 ,.,,. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WO OR FY 2000 TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to SeDtember 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, MO 1/2/ Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 1/ Improvement, adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2/ Inactive portion of project deauthorized Jan 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 27 - 22 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Bamard, KS 1/ Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA 1/ Big Blue River, Seward, NE 1/ Big Stranger Creek, KS 1/ Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS Indian Creek Channel Modification 11 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO a/ Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO }1 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) 41 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) East Muddy Creek, MO I/ Elk Creek, Clyde, KS 1/ Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS 11 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS Lawrence, Kansas River, KS Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO Lower Grand River, MO 3/ Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO 2/ Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage, (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 12/9 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE 1/ Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS 1/ Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1961 1973 1953 1974 - 1994 1966 1976 1977 1973 1966 1984 1973 1966 1984 1950 1984 Completed 1980 Completed 1985 Completed inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed 1989 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 Constructior 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 Operation and Maintenance .-. , -., 269,288 2/ 451,400 692,706 41 8,052,990 989,015 726,966 1,271,025 2,782,793 51 67,275 25,010,500 6/ 42,434,197 7/ 8,773,488 A/ 25,530,083 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,036,624 4,462,661 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 27 -23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORK: FY 2000 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Constructior Maintenance Topeka, Kansas River, KS Completed 1974 21,174,593 - Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO / Inactive 1966 Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO Completed 1990 1,570,000 - Upper Grand River, MO 2/ Inactive 1966 - - 1I Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 21 Required non-Federal contributions $129,680. a1 Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 4/ Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized Jan 1,1990 by Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 5/ Includes $130,841 non-Federal contributions. 6I Inactive units Kansas Avenue Bridge and Approach, and Lower Argentine Units were deauthorized Jult 9, 1995 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(2) of WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99- 662. Construction cost above includes $67,500 for deauthorized Bridge and Approach Unit; does not include $1,181,000 non- Federal Contributions. 7/ Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 9/ Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 91 Patonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and town relocation portions of the project were deauthorized Jan 1,1990 in accordance with Section 1001 (b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 27 - 24 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report Fc Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Arlington Lake, MO 1948 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE 1965 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)-- 1977 Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only 11 Dry Fork and East Fork 1974 Lakes, Fishing River, MO Fort Scott Lake 1976 Gamett Lake, Pottawatomie 1973 Creek, KS Gasconade River Navigation, 1931 MO Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, K 1977 Hackleman Corners Lake, -- Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS 3/ 1974 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS 1976 Kansas City, Kansas River, 1984 KS (62) Mod)-Inactive Units Kansas Avenue Bridge Approach, and Lower Argentine Units Only Kansas River Navigation 1980 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Flood Control Act appr September 3, 1954 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1954 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. 2nd Sess) Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1928 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1962 Flood Control Act, S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874 $8,651 16,317 211,600 51,989 757,500 71,466 2/ 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 67,500 4/ 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, 259,900 Sec. 201 -- Aug 5, 1977 - May 6, 1981 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Apr 5, 1999 Nov 17, 1986 -- Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 -- Jan 18, 1978 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jul 9, 1995 -- Nov 17, 1986 27 - 25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report Fc Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Marysville, KS Melvem Lake and Pomona - Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS 1970 Mill Lake, Blue River, MO 1971 Missouri River Levee System, IA, KS, MO, and NE Deauthorized by Sec. 1002 Water Resources Development Act of 1968, P.L. 99-662, Section 1002: Units R402; - R393-395; and R414 Deauthorized in accordance - with WRDA Section 1001(b)(1): Units L36; R42; L51; R55-59-61; L68-92; R70; L78; R87;L94; L99; L103; R104; R107; R112; L117; L121; L124; L129; L134; L137-139; L145; R150; L154; L157; R161; L164; R169; L175; R179-184; L191-196; L205; L217; R226; R240; R251; L256; R259; L263-270 I; R272; R284; R302; R336; L353; L357; R361; L362; L392; L419-426; L435; R512-513, Section III Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 17 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 133,682 39,708 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. 57,500 1,631,700 Jan 1967 Jan 1, 1990 - Nov 27, 1973 Nov 17, 1986 -- Nov 17, 1986 - Jan 1, 1990 27-26 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report Fc Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS Osage River Navigation, MO, 1952 lock and dam Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 7/ 1-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation Pioneer Lake, KS Pomme de Terre Lake (Power Addition), MO Richland Lake, MO 1976 1976 1952 1954 1974 1948 Flood Control Act of 1962, Octo- 2,178,261 ber 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) Original lock and dam authorized 658,076 6/ Mar 3, 1899; improvement authorized in 1928; placed in standby status Jul 1952 and operation & maintenance discontinued. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 393,623 (H. Doc. 241, 89th Cong., 1st sess) 91,929 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 95,692 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Flood Control Act of 1954 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) Flood Control Act approved June 28, 8,548 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 -- Aug 5, 1977 27 - 27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report Fc Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Tomahawk Lake, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 77,189 -- Nov 17, 1986 Blue River, KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 Nov 17, 1986 Improvement-1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS -- Water Resources Development Act o - - Jan 1, 1990 Road and Bridge (1976 1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 Act) Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 1,095,020 Nov 17, 1986 KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1/ For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. a/ For completed project see Table 27-C. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001(b)(1) WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 3/ Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS, Section 205 feasibility study terminated in March 1991 due to lack of identifiable project that would meet dam safety concerns. 4/ For completed Argentine, Amourdale, and Central Industrial Units of project, see Table 27-E. / Incorrectly shown as R263-270 in the deauthorization act. 6/ Operation and maintenance costs $850,495. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 (b)(1) of WRDA, P.L. 99-662. 7 Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See Table 27-E. 27 -28 KANSAS CITY , MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 14 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R512-513 Richardson Co. D.D. No. 7 R500 Iowa Point D. D. No. 4 Kimsey Holly Creek L497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. No. 7 R482 Burr Oak D. D. No. 3 L476 Amazonia L. D. R460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L443-448 Halls L. D. R440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L400 Waldron L. D. L385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R351 Atherton L. D. L330-345 Orrick L. D. L319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L142 L15 North County L. D. Remaining units 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 6.0 40.0 Complete--1958 Complete--1954 Complete--1970 Complete--1962 Complete--1955 Complete--1954 Complete--l 956 Complete--1968 Complete--1967 Complete--1957 Complete--1959 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 Complete-1 957 Planning underway Complete--1966 Inactive Inactive Complete--1983 Planning underway Planning underway Detailed planning not initiated 27- 29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 16 of Text) Federal Non-Federal Non-Federal Project Status Cost Cost Reimbursable Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS C $1,099,350 $287,000 Bartley, Republican River, NE C 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS D 71,186,000 19,314,000 $44,800,000 5. Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS D 71,466 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE C 48,129,549 -- Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO C 550,908,965 -- 138,385,000 6/ Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS C 64,161,400 - 21,145,338 5/ Indianola, Republican River, NE C 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS C 12,577,227 -- Lawrence, Kansas River, KS C 8,620,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS C 2,488,585 265,000 Melvem Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 37,436,530 -- 7,131,834 7/ Melvem Lake and Pomona Lake (Road improvement), KS (1974 Authorization) D -- Milford Lake, Republican River, KS C 49,566,492 -- 12,162,134 51 Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth 8/ A 93,553,000 35,265,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS C 49,095,918 -- 8,551,805 5/ Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO C 17,365,453 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS C 14,003,238 -- 862,923 5/ Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS C 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO C 79,975,357 - 24,206,593 2/ Topeka, Kansas River, KS C 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS C 80,584,079 - 2,333,916 51 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS--Road and Bridge (1976 Act) D - Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) D 3,000 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS C 20,463,367 1/ Status: A = Active; C = Completed; D = Deauthoriz 7/ In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding I = Inactive. between the State of Kansas and the Dept. of the Army 2/ Actual appropriations for completed and deauthoriz dated 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acreprojects; estimated appropriation requirements for active feet of water supply was made in March 1995. and inactive projects. 8/ Active portion of project. Currently estimated cost 3/ Estimated cost during construction. (1997): Deferred portion of project--$46,753,000 Federal 4/ Future reimbursement of initial Federal cost. and $4,336,000 non-Federal; Inactive portion of project-- 5/ Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water $104,791,000 Federal and $11,296,000 non-Federal. Actual supply. cost of deauthorized units (1990) is $1,689,200 Federal. 6/ Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power 2 Includes $22,116,864 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power, and $2,089,729 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. 27 - 30 TABLE 27-J KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) ffimmmw Project Month Inspecte Missouri River Main Stem R482, R500, R440 and Atchison, KS L497, L488, L476 Kimsey Holley Creek, MO Birmingham, MO Fairfax Jersey Creek (KCK) North Kansas City, MO (Lower Section L408, L400, R471-460 and R351-1 KCMO Units - CID (MO), East Bottoms, NKC Airport L448-443, L455 L246, Lower Chariton, MO and New Haven, MO R512-513 Kansas River North Topeka, Soldier Creek South Topeka Units-Oakland, South Topeka, Aubumdalr and Waterworks Unit Manhattan, KS Ft Riley, KS Lawrence, KS Kaw Valley-Argentine, Armourdale, Lower Fairfax, CID (KS) Lower Fairfax (all KCK) Osae River (MO) Marais des Cvanes (KS) Ottawa, KS Osawatomie, KS Smokey Hill, Saline. Solomon Rivers & Tributaries (KS) Abilene, KS Saline, KS & Barnard, KS Gypsum, KS Republican River Clyde, KS Indianola, NE Big and Little Blue Rivers (KS & NE) Frankfort, KS Fairbury, NE, Seward, NE Blue River (MO) GSA Complex (KCMO) Blue River Channel & Brush Creek (KCMO) 27- 31 Little Blue River Channel, Jackson County. MO R351-11 Little Blue River Channel, Jackson, MO Lake City AAP, MO 1 I I Apr-2000 Apr-2000 Apr-2000 May-2000 May-2000 May-2000 May-2000 Jun-2000 Jun-2000 Jun-2000 Oct-2000 Apr-2000 Apr-2000 May-2000 Jun-2000 Sep-2000 Oct-2000 Jun-2000 Jun-2000 Jun-2000 Sep- 2000 Oct-2000 Apr-2000 Oct-2000 Apr-2000 Sep-2000 May-2000 Jun-2000 May-2000 Jul-2000 Jul-2000 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Miscellaneous Bedford, IA Apr-2000 Shoal Creek, MO Aug-2000 Macon-Adair Project, Kirksville, MO Aug-2000 Stonehouse Creek, KS Sep-2000 27- 32 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 27-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES (See Section 28 of Test) Fiscal Year Study Status 11 Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, June 30, 1948, as Amended Section 205 Coordination Account $20,660 St Joseph, MO F 59,661 Excelsior Springs, MO F 2,493 Brunswick, MO F 20,412 Wears Creek, MO F 19,972 TOTAL ALL SECTION 205 ACTIVITIES $123,198 Emergency Streambank Protection--Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act Public Law 526, 79th Congress, July 24, 1946, as Amended Section 14 Coordination Account -- $17,441 Chariton River, MO D 17,518 Delaware River Water Intake, Kickapoo Reservation, KS C 64,458 Flat Creek, MO D 48,649 Grand River, Route A Bridge, MO D 8,875 Grand River, Chariton County, MO, Salt Creek Bridge C 4,398 Hinkson Creek, Columbia Sewermain, MO C 93,742 Kansas River, Eudora Bend Bridge, KS D 59,566 Little Blue River Barnes Road D 2,782 Muddy Creek, Grundy County, MO C -1,872 Platte River Bridge, Conception, MO D 16,416 West Creek, Topeka, KS C 83,763 West Fork, Grand River, Route H Bridge, Gentry County, MO C -6,757 West Fork, Grand River, Route W Roadway C 2,250 TOTAL ALL SECTION 14 ACTIVITIES $411,229 27- 33 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, November 17, 1986 Coordination Account Funds $13,525 Initial Appraisals, General I 12,818 Blue Springs Lake Habitat, MO D 2,986 Milford Lake Habitat Restoration, KS F 57,461 Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA P 23,772 TOTAL ALL SECTION 1135 ACTIVITIES $110,562 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Section 206, Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Public Law 303, 104th Congress, October 12, 1996 Coordination Account Funds $15,659 Preliminary Restoration Funds I 22,836 Lake Nemaha Wetlands, KS F 42,237 Straightwater Marsh, Wetland Habitat F 17,278 TOTAL SECTION 206 ACTIVITIES $98,010 11 Status: I = Initial; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O =Operational Emergency Response Activities (See Section 28 of Text) Emergency Flood Control Activities-Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work- Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation Activit Approp 96X3125 FY 00 Exoendtures FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disaster Prepardness Program-100 Planning Activities $421,695 Training and Exercise 10,215 Facilities -15,272 National Centers for Expertise 0 Total Disaster Preparedness Program $416t638 27- 34 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Emergency Operations-200 Response Operations-210 Acquisition of Supplies & Equipment Operational Deployment Total Emergency Operations Rehabilitation-300 Federal Flood Control Works Non-Federal Flood Control Works Field Investigation Inspections Interagency Levee Activities Total Rehabilitation $0 99,778 12,064 $111,842 $1,679,302 48,018 46,475 0 131,788 $1,905,583 Emergency Water Supplies and Draught Assistance-400 Field Investigations $5,757 Total $5,757 Hazard Mitigation-600 Hazard Mitigation Team Activities 0 FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES TOTAL FEDERAL NON-REIMBURSEABLE ACTIVITIES $2,439,820 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds Approp 96X8862 Expenditures SPONSOR'S CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Maintenance-300 Non-Federal Flood Control Works-320 $3,611 TOTAL ALL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES EXPENDITURES 27- 35 $2,443,431 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-L ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 30 of Text) Federal Cost Total By Item and PWI Number FY 00 Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Swope Park Industrial Area, Kansas City, MO--012821 Kansas City, MO & KS-13268 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) Kansas City, MO & KS--013268 MRLS, Units L455 and R460-471 (013267) Topeka, KS--013200 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations--017250 Interagency Water Resources Development-014713 North American Waterfowl Mgmt-053904 Subtotal Coordination with Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests (180) Coop with Other Water Resources Agencies (181)--053907 Planning Assistance to States (186) Subtotal $55,027 99,887 $154,914 $100,301 117,051 111,000 $328,352 $145,547 10,181 3,500 $160,724 $16,050 307,764 $323,814 TOTAL SURVEYS (Category 100) $966,308 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Service Unit--082030 Technical Services-082040 Quick Responses--082045 Flood Plains Management Study--082500 Special Studies Liberty, MO--083070 Missouri SEM MRCS-083614 Bluefield, VA--083650 Subtotal $35,152 44,877 6,000 -961 747 364 38,784 $124,963 27 - 36 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITY FOR FY 2000 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrology Studies-053820 $26,204 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Flood Control Projects (Project Not Fully Authorized) (Category 450) Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO-012381 $71,053 Flood Control Projects (Fully Authorized Project) (Category 600) Turkey Creek KS & MO Cost Sharing $269,394 Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO--012563 298,719 TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 27- 37 $151,167 $639,167 $1,756,642 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-M REGULATORY PROGRAM (See Section 34 of Text) Federal cost Item and PWI Number FY 00 PERMIT EVALUATION (100) REG-Permit Evaluation--008204 ENFORCEMENT (200) REG-Enforcement--008205 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS (600) -013579 GRAND TOTAL REGULATORY PROGRAM 27 - 38 $2,157,527 325,586 17,784 $2,500,897 __ PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT* REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. Improvements Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville 28-2 Dam, OR and WA 2. Chetco River, OR 28-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR 28-3 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 28-4 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island 28-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA 28-5 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR. 28-5 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial Hammond, OR 28-6 9. Coos Bay, OR 28-6 10. Coquille River, OR 28-7 11. Depoe Bay, OR 28-7 12. Port Orford, OR 28-8 13. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR 28-8 14. Siuslaw River, OR 28-8 15. Skipanon Channel, OR 28-9 16. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 28-9 17. Umpqua River, OR 28-10 18. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 28-10 19. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 28-11 20. Yaquina River, OR 28-12 21. Project Condition Surveys 28-12 22. Navigation Activities Under Special Authorization 28-12 Shore Protection 23. Shore Protection Activities Under Special Authorization 28-12 Flood Control 24. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 28-12 25. Blue River Lake, OR 28-13 26. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 28-13 27. Dorena Lake, OR 28-13 28. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 28-14 29. Fall Creek Lake, OR 28-15 30. Fern Ridge Lake, OR 28-15 31. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA. 28-1 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 32. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA 28-16 33. Scappoose Drainage District, OR 28-17 34. Willamette River Basin Bank 28-17 Protection, OR 35. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR 28-17 36. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 28-18 37. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 28-18 38. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 28-18 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 39.Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA 28-19 40. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and WA 28-20 41. Cougar Lake, OR 28-20 42. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR 28-21 43. Green Peter - Foster Lakes, OR 28-21 44. Hills Creek Lake, OR 28-22 45. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 28-22 46. Lookout Point - Dexter Lakes, OR 28-23 47. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 28-24 48. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR 28-24 Environmental 49. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR and WA 28-25 50. Willamette River Temperature Control, OR 28-26 51. Environmental Activities Under Special Authorization 28-26 General Investigations 52. Surveys 28-27 53. Collection and Study of Basic Data 28-28 54. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 28-28 Other 55. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 28-28 Tables 5 Table 28-A Cost & Financial Statement 28-30 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation 28-37 28-1 PORTLAND DISTRICT Tables (Cont'd) Page Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 28-38 Table 28-D Not Applicable Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 28-39 Table 28-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power 28-41 Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects 28-41 Table 28-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River bellow Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR 28-42 Table 28-1 Project Condition Surveys 28-42 Table 28-J Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks 28-42 Table 28-K Flood Control Reservoir Operations 28-43 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber is 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $348,100,000. Construction of the lock is completed. The lock opened to shipping on March 26, 1993. Restoration of the grounds and historic buildings is complete. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued real estate activities to obtain title to project lands. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203). Tables (Cont'd) Page Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to "direct the Secretary of the Army to assume maintenance of the approximately 200-foot long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths". This channel will be maintained in lieu of the small boat access channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish 28-2 Table 28-L Work Under Special Authorities, Projects Not Specifically Authorized 28-44 Table 28-M Work Under Special Authorities, Emergency Response Activities 28-45 Table 28-N Principal Data Concerning Columbia River Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, and Powerplant 28-46 Table 28-0 Bonneville Power Admin Cost and Financial Statement 28-48 Table 28-P Power Revenue and Power Generation 28-50 Table 28-Q Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects 28-50 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 36,094 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked six days. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permits maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette River and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) A feasibility study for deepening the Columbia and Lower Willamette navigation channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-lift-off and roll-on-rolloff containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the west coast's largest, and the 28-3 PORTLAND DISTRICT world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-rolloff and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 7.4 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 3.8 million cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 362,640 cubic yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed about 3 million cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Dodge Island removed 202,450 cubic yards. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked five days in the Cowlitz Old Mouth Channel. An additional 600 feet west of the easternmost 400 feet of the East Astoria Boat Basin North Breakwater was repaired with new sheetpile. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2,000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at llwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Smallboat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract clamshell dredge Sea Vulture removed 186,300 cubic yards of material. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. 28-4 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract clamshell dredge Seattle removed 297,700 cubic yards of material. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 3. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-milewide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918, south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48- foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. In FY 95 a 500-foot section of the south jetty was removed to allow unimpeded access by fisheries resources to 603 acres of intertidal habitat under Section 1135 authority. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty, which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 4.8 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2.9 million cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Dodge Island removed 1.9 million cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 3, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about I mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 17 feet, which is adequate for user traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat-building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. 28-5 PORTLAND DISTRICT At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 115,700 cubic yards of material. A total of 10 king piles were constructed at the ends of existing timber pile dikes. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Location. The memorial will be located at Point Adams, in the City of Warrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. Existing project. None. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) with the local sponsor, City of Warrenton, OR, is being developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation structure is being built. Operations during fiscal year. All work has been suspended and Federal funds were rescinded. The local sponsor was unable to raise sufficient funds for purchase of the statue or for costs above the $150,000 limit for the support structure. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and I mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) A modification to the existing project was authorized in the FY 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 104- 46, November 13, 1995. This authorization provided for deepening the channel by 2 feet to 47 feet below mean lower low water (MLLW) from the entrance to Guano Rock (river mile 1) and to 37 feet below MLLW from river mile I to 15. Public Law 104-46 also provided for deepening by two feet and expanding the turning basin at river mile 12 by 100 feet from 800 by 1000 feet to 900 by 1000 feet. The excavation material for the channel deepening was transported to the ocean for disposal. The cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and the construction of the project was $11,616,000, of which $8,116,000 was federal and $3,500,000 was non-federal. In addition, the sponsor paid 100 28-6 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 percent of the estimated cost for dredging the berth areas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The sponsor, International Port of Coos Bay, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 8, 1996 for the project modification to deepen the channel as authorized in Public Law 104-46. In accordance with cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the Federal Government provided 75 percent of the costs associated with the general navigation features of the project. The non-federal sponsor was required to provide 25 percent of the total construction cost of the general navigation features up front. The sponsor was also required to provide an additional 10 percent of the cost of the general navigation features of the project in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300-foot, 576- foot and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller T-dock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200- foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project construction was completed in FY98, except for post construction monitoring which was completed in FY00. Maintenance: A total of 945,100 cubic yards of material was removed. The US hopper dredge Yaquina removed 195,900 cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Dodge Island removed 749,200 cubic yards. The sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 20 days in Charleston entrance channel. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. The economics were reevaluated in FY1993 and the project was not economically feasible at that time. Local cooperation. Restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects funding, required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 14,359 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) 28-7 PORTLAND DISTRICT Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, were accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract pipeline and clamshell dredges removed 19,845 cubic yards of material. A project condition survey and miscellaneous inspections were performed. 12. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55- foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to allow the Corps to maintain the authorized navigation channel within 50 feet of the port facility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In FY 2000 local interests replaced the aging wooden pile dock with a sheet pile bulkhead and backfill dock. This dock provides almost 3 acres of dock area and two large-capacity cranes. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 40 days. 13. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at etrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about I mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. In 1997, at the direction of Congress, the boat basin entrance channel was relocated approximately 1,000 feet upstream to a new opening in the breakwater provided by the Port of Gold Beach. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 44,845 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel. Sandbypasser Sandwick worked 10 days. 14. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep 28-8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 1 1 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 86. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originates approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. In cooperation with local interests and the U.S. Coast Guard, the entrance channel was realigned in FY00. This has resulted in a safer entrance and reduced dredging. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 55,050 cubic yards of material. 15. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet, which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet; extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 266,800 cubic yards of material was removed by contract dredges Sea Vulture and Crystal Gayle. 16. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of 28-9 PORTLAND DISTRICT Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet; extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 and small-boat basin in 1958. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1965 and again in 1991. South jetty construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18-foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract pipeline dredge removed 32,825 cubic yards of material near Garibaldi. 17. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 125,747 cubic yards of material, and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 16 days at Winchester Bay. 18. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels 28-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 28-J. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. As a result of the mill closure in 1996, one of two shifts was eliminated and hours of operation reduced. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Simpson Paper closed the mill in 1996 after over 100 years of operations. The mill was sold to West Linn Paper. West Linn Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. The use of the wharf for operations purposes by the mill may be changed due to shipping changes by the new owner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions, were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving oceangoing vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats is complete. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100- foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities 28-11 PORTLAND DISTRICT are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Displaced jetty stone was removed from the entrance channel to alleviate dangerous navigation conditions. Evaluation of ocean dredged material disposal sites continued. Maintenance dredging was not required. 20. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon coast. (See US Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Slough, extending from town of Yaquina near RM 4.0 to Toledo at RM 14.4. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depot Slough. Channel work authorized March 1913 was completed in 1914. Additional work authorized in 1960 was completed in 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head of Yaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. The Port of Toledo has public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: None required. 21. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys are conducted to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and channels not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Fiscal year costs were $83,448. See Table 28-1 for surveys conducted during the FY. 22. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended. In addition to general requirements, each project is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $4,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount, in cash, not less than 10 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost for navigation depending upon the planned depth of channel or basin; pay an additional 10 percent of the construction costs in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years after project completion. The non-federal sponsor must also agree to provide, maintain, and operate an adequate public parking, landing or wharf, service facilities, berthing areas, floats, pier, slips and similar marina and mooring facilities. The remaining portion of the project, such as the access channel or breakwater structure, is maintained by the Corps of Engineers at Federal expense within a limited amount. Federal expenditures for operation and maintenance under the Section 107 authority are administratively limited to the greater of $4,500,000, or 2.25 times the Federal costs of the project including costs for the feasibility through the construction phases. No projects were under construction during the fiscal year. Shore Protection 23. SHORE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Protection of the shores of publicly owned property from hurricane and storm damage pursuant to Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, Public Law 874, 87t' Congress, as Amended. In addition to general requirements, each project is limited to a Federal statutory expenditure of not more than $3,000,000 per year. Costs for protection of Federally owned property are 100 percent Federal. Costs assigned to areas meeting public use criteria are 35 percent non-Federal. Costs assigned to protection of privately owned undeveloped lands and shores that are not open to the public are 100 percent non-Federal. See Table 28-L for expenditures under Section 103 during the fiscal year. No projects were under construction during the FY. Flood Control 24. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with 28-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers, with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 28- K. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance was performed. 25. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-andgravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low water flows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) was granted a FERC license in November 1989 to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. EWEB has delayed their plans for hydropower units pending the conclusion of a Corps proposal to add water temperature control to the regulating outlet tower. Refer to the Willamette River Temperature Control project write-up for additional information. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. 26. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gatecontrolled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28- K. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. 28-13 PORTLAND DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work continued. 27. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low water flows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249- foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide fUture municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Funds to initiate preconstruction planning were appropriated in FY65, and for construction in FY71. Construction was deferred in FY77 due to a lack of state support. Following significant review, evaluation, and a public hearing, the Water Policy Review Board reversed its position and in April 1981 voted to support Elk Creek. Funds were appropriated in FY82 and FY83 to update and continue project design, plans, and specifications. Funds were appropriated in FY85 to resume construction. After initiation of construction, an injunction was placed against completion of the project and additional analysis under National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was required in order to remove the injunction. Construction of the project was terminated with the project at 83 feet, one-third its design height. After completion of the final Environmental Impact Statement Supplemental #2, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the Court to remove the injunction. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling on April 21, 1995. In a 2-1 decision, the Court also reversed the District Court decision that EISS #2 met the requirements of the earlier Ninth Circuit opinion and awarded attorneys fees to the plaintiffs. The case was remanded with instructions to prepare a third supplement adequately addressing all issues raised under the NEPA process. Due to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision and the current Federal budgetary climate, the Corps does not plan to perform the environmental studies under NEPA necessary to remove the Federal court injunction against completion of the project. Therefore, an evaluation of the requirements for long term of the project in its uncompleted state will be required. Although the Corps has no plans to perform the NEPA studies required to remove the injunction at this time, removal of a section of the spillway and left abutment will not prevent future completion of the project. Removing a section of the dam will provide passive fish passage in accordance with the language in the FY97 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act. In addition, it is the most cost effective method to provide fish passage over the long term with the project in an uncompleted state. Until construction of the fish passage modification is complete, fish passage around the project will continue to be provided by the Department of Fish and Wildlife using Corps' funds. Funds were not available to construct the fish passage corridor in FY00, so consultations began with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) concerning alternatives for long-term fish passage at Elk Creek under the Endangered Species Act. Four 28-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 potential upstream fish passage alternatives were evaluated in the Corps' biological assessment. Based on this analysis, it was determined that passage through the existing diversion tunnel and continued operation of the existing trap and haul facility would result in jeopardy to the continued existence of coho salmon in Elk Creek over a ten to fifty year period. The assessment found that construction of a new trap and haul facility, designed to function effectively with the uncompleted project or removal of a section of the dam to provide a fish passage corridor, would not impact the continued existence of the species. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities requires a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Operation during construction continued. 29. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a subagreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of the Middle Fork, Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Construction of three waterfowl impoundments was completed in 1994 under Section 1135 authority. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require cost sharing. The Oregon Department of Fish 28-15 PORTLAND DISTRICT and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory waterfowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On the Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $28,000,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-ofway; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $2,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. One bank protection project was under construction as follows: Barlow Point, WA Location: Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 1 (CCDID#1) is located on the north bank of the Columbia River in Cowlitz County, Washington. The district is approximately 38 miles downstream from Portland, Oregon. Barlow Point is point of land that protrudes into the Columbia River on the Washington shore at Columbia RM 61.8. The area of CCDID#1 is nearly 10,000 acres, of which 2,722 acres are in the cities of Longview and West Kelso. Longview alone has protected land and improvements exceeding $3 billion in value. Erosion of Barlow Point had been progressing at an average rate of about five feet per year for the last several years and threatened to encroach into the toe of the levee. Project Description: Construction consisted of placement of rock-filled erosion protection mattresses over compacted fill covering an area of approximately 1220 feet long by 24 feet wide from an existing downstream beach access area to the existing riprap at the upstream end, with plantings 2 foot on center of willows and dogwoods. Local cooperation: The Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. I signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on August 21, 2000. 32. MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125-foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests were also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers visitor services in their viewpoint area. Nonfederal cash contribution is $3,600,000 and the estimated non-federal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Coordination with Federal and local agencies continued. Continued an engineering reanalysis of anticipated erosion and deposition of the debris avalanche. 28-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 33. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Location. Scappoose Drainage District is located in Columbia County, Oregon, along the left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. Project Description. The project, as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements, as provided for in the Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950, consisted of raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. The project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. The additional improvements were completed in September 1980. The main pumping plant was constructed by the Corps of Engineers as part of a comprehensive plan for upgrading the flood protection works to provide protection against the Standard Project Flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second as measured at The Dalles, Oregon. This equates to a flood level of 27.8 feet and 26.2 at the upstream and downstream ends, respectively, of the drainage district. The four pumps at the main pumping plant did not operate properly during the February 1996 flood. The problem began when the Columbia River exceeded the ordinary high water level of 14 feet. At that point, the pumps started to overheat and shut down. When the river stage reaches approximately 22.5 feet, the motor overload protection trips out. Emergency measures were taken by rotating the operation of the pumps. All pump motors overheated and only one pump at a time in rotation could be operated. The reduced pumping capability induced interior flooding that caused extensive damage to a large plant nursery, flooded residential properties, and cut off access to interior drainage channel pump stations. The pumps were designed to operate with river stages from +1.0 to 26.6 feet. The river crested at 26.6 feet during the flood. During the February 1996 flood the pumps were tested under major flooding conditions for the first time. Corrective action was to replace the existing pump impellers having a 17 degree pitch with impellers having 14.5 degree pitch. The cost for this corrective action was $119,000, which was 100% Federal. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project closeout. 34. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 35. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. 28-17 PORTLAND DISTRICT The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works, and to ascertain whether those works are properly maintained by local interests. Numerous leveed areas and bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Did not perform aerial inspection of 186 revetments in the Willamette River Basin due to non- Department of Defense (DOD) certification for helicopter companies in Oregon. DOD certification has now been obtained, and inspection of these revetments will be completed in FY01. Refer to Table 28-Q for information relating to completed works. Fiscal year costs were $113,058. 37. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins), one local project operated by Douglas County (Galesville), and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. The four Bureau of Reclamation projects, Douglas County project and Mossyrock project were operated during the fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for each project. Total cost of monitoring and flood control direction of the six projects during the fiscal year was $59,422. 38. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended: In addition to general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $7,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. Two projects were under construction as follows: Keizer, OR Location: The city of Keizer is located 40 miles south of Portland, Oregon and immediately north of Salem, Oregon, on the right bank of the Willamette River. Project description: The city of Keizer constructed the Keizer Dike after the 1965 flood to protect the population from flooding of the Willamette River. The population has steadily grown to 31,000 in 2000. In 1995 the Federal Emergency Management Agency revised its flood insurance rate map of Keizer to include a large area of the city within the one-percent (100-year) floodplain. The reason for the revision was due to the low crest elevation of the dike and backwater from the Willamette River through a low swale. The close proximity of residential structures to the dike complicated solutions that would increase the level of protection. The authorized project included three components: 1) a concrete wall constructed inside the dike, which is called the riverwall, 2) an earthen embankment across the low swale and 3) four valves stormdrain pipes. The riverwall is 12 inches thick, 2,600 feet long and extends up to 18 inches above the existing dike crest. The downstream cross-dike is 220 feet long, 28 feet wide and two feet high. The right-of-way involved 26 property owners. The authorized project was based on an average annual cost of $47,400 and average annual benefits of $217,800 resulting in a 4.6 benefit-cost ratio. The project was constructed during the summer and fall 2000. The construction cost, including real estate, was $700,000. Local cooperation: The city of Keizer is the nonfederal sponsor. They are responsible for providing lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged disposal sites for the project. They are also 28-18 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 responsible for operation and maintenance of the project. Due to the nature of the project, the annual operation and maintenance cost is anticipated to be minimal. Operations during fiscal year: A construction contract was awarded on August 2, 2000 and will be completed early in FY01. Peninsula Drainage District No. I, OR: Location. Peninsula Drainage District is located in Portland, Oregon along the Columbia River near river mile 106. Project Description. The Peninsula Drainage District is surrounded by 6.8 miles of levees, flood walls, and railroad and highway embankments. The weak links in the flood protect works are the railroad embankment and the outlet pipe of the pumping plant located on the Columbia Slough levee. The project consists of reinforcing the flood protective system in order to protect against the 100-year reoccurrence frequency flood event. This will be accomplished by reinforcing 2,000 linear feet of the landward side of the railroad embankment at the southwest corner of the drainage district and raising the outlet pipes of the pumping station to above-design flood level of 28.7 feet Portland Datum. The railroad embankment will be reinforced by constructing a sand embankment structure against the landward slope of the railroad embankment having a 12-foot wide crown and I vertical to 5 horizontal side slopes. The catch point along a portion of this fill is in a golf course water hazard and the embankment will cover existing golf course tees. As a consequence, a 200 linear foot gabion retaining wall will confine the fill and allow construction of a flat bench so the tees can be reestablished. The height of the retaining wall will vary from 2 to 9 feet. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project is $1,484,000, of which $1,113,000 is federal and $371,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. The Peninsula Drainage District Number 1, Oregon, the non-federal sponsor, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on July 3, 1997. Operations during fiscal year. The project was modified to address safety issues. A boat barrier was added to preclude access to the outlet. The contract for this task was awarded on Sept 1, 1999 and was physically complete Nov 10, 1999. Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended: In addition to general requirements, each project is limited to a federal statutory expenditure of not more than $1,000,000 in any one year. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. No projects were under construction during the fiscal year. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 39. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 3. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. I extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 28-N. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power 28-19 PORTLAND DISTRICT installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is complete. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 2,700,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require costsharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse was $678,945,000. In June 1993 work began on the rehabilitation of the First Powerhouse. In the first phase the existing circuit breakers and ten transformers were replaced and the switchyard was rehabilitated. Circuit breaker work was completed in 1995. The remaining work was completed in 1997. Phase I cost was $24,120,000. The second phase consists of replacing the windings of six generators and replacing ten turbines. Second phase work was contracted in 1994 and is scheduled to complete in 2009. Phase 11 will cost an estimated $110,800,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 1989. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate actions to provide access to Crates Point for State of Washington received State of Washington, Dept. of Ecology, concurrence that site monitoring for contamination is no longer necessary. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Repair of units 12 and 18 stator winding and rewedge repairs were completed. Completed navigation lock gate retensioning. Routine operation and maintenance was performed with enhanced maintenance on the turbines. Major Rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate the generators and turbines in the first powerhouse is in progress. Two units have been rehabilitated to date. Completed bridge crane repair. 40. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Location. This project provides for construction of 31 sites along the Columbia River on Bonneville pool, John Day pool, and The Dalles pool. Existing project. Congress has provided authority through public law to implement a wide range of land management, transfer, acquisition and development actions to provide fishing access for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River. The law designates certain federal sites on Bonneville, John Day, and The Dalles pools for fishing access. The improvements required at the access sites are specified in the authorizing legislation. They include all weather access roads, camping facilities, boat ramps, docks, sanitation, and fish cleaning facilities. Construction of these facilities will greatly improve access by the four tribes, which have fishing rights along this reach of the Columbia River. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work on plans and specifications for Phase II sites continued. Construction of the second phase sites continued. A total of 17 sites have been completed. 41. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles 28-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Units is $114,000,000. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units I and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 28-K. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. The addition of water temperature control to the intake tower is authorized. Water temperature control will enhance fish passage and incubation in the McKenzie River. Refer to the Willamette River Temperature Control project write-up for additional information. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 42. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Refurbished Big Cliff gantry crane. 43. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through 28-21 PORTLAND DISTRICT spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiplepurpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Rewind Green Peter Unit I and Unit 2 completed. 44. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gatecontrolled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 45. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control 28-22 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 28-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Construction and implementation of the data acquisition control system continued. Rewind of unit 4 completed. Initiated replacement of main unit breakers. Started installation of new exciters. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 46. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project costsharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Completed installation of new exciters at Lookout Point and Dexter. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28-23 PORTLAND DISTRICT 47. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units I and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200-unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 28-K. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 48. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 28-N. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water supply 28-24 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. In October 1996 work began on major rehabilitation of powerhouse units 1-14. Work includes rewind of nine generators, replacement of blades on twelve turbine units, refurbishment of blades on two turbine units, and refurbishment of two bridge cranes. The total cost for major rehabilitation is estimated at $101,000,000 with completion in September 2010. Electrical power generation and associated revenue from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency, are shown on Table 28-P. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued work on the data acquisition control system and installation of fish unit exciters. Completed Line Drop Compensation, replacement of 4160 station service breakers, and installation of exciters for units 15-22. Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Major Rehabilitation: Continued generator rewind and exciter installation, initiated turbine efficiency testing, awarded roller gate contract, and procured an additional stator core. Environmental 49. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR AND WA Location. At Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day Dams on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. This project encompasses work at five other locations within Walla Walla District. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to migrating salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the juvenile and adult fish bypass facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement within Portland District includes the following: (a) Bonneville - new juvenile fish monitoring facilities, and outfall relocation; (b) The Dalles - submerged extended fish screens and bypass system, new gantry crane and maintenance facility; (c) John Day - new juvenile fish monitoring facility, and planning and design for potential drawdown of the reservoir to minimum operating pool; (d) a mitigation study that analyzes long-term alternatives including impacts of federal Columbia River system and other activities on estuary habitat, surface bypass technology, gas abatement and improved turbine passage to improve fish passage and survival through Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The current fully funded total estimated Federal project cost is $1,386,000,000 which includes $778,400,000 for improvements in Walla Walla District, $597,817,000 in Portland District and $9,783,000 provided by the Bonneville Power Administration for design of the Bonneville juvenile fish monitoring facility. For information on the planned improvements in the upper Columbia and Snake Rivers, see Walla Walla District's Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: General: Continued to collect biological and hydraulic data at all projects, and develop alternatives to improve existing anadromous fish bypass methodology and systems, to reduce excess dissolved gas entrainment associated with use of the spillways and to improve turbine passage survival. Bonneville Dam: Completed construction of the juvenile fish bypass maintenance facility at the second powerhouse. Completed bio evaluation of the 28-25 PORTLAND DISTRICT surface collection facility and extended length screen prototype at the first powerhouse. Initiated design for the juvenile fish bypass improvements at the first powerhouse. The Dalles Dam: Continued sluiceway and spillway juvenile survival studies in conjunction with development of future bypass system alternatives. Continued design for relocating sluiceway outfall and for provision of emergency auxiliary water for adult fishways. Initiated design of the adult south fish ladder channel dewatering facility. John Day Dam: Continued testing of extended length (40 ft.) bypass screens for potential replacement of existing 20 ft. screens associated with the existing juvenile bypass system. Completed Phase I of the John Day drawdown study. 50. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR Location. At the Blue River and Cougar Lake projects in the McKenzie River sub-basin of the Willamette River basin in western Oregon. Project Description. Work consists of retrofitting the intake tower structures with movable weir intakes to allow modification of water temperatures downstream from the Blue River and Cougar projects. Water temperatures are currently cooler in the spring/summer and warmer in the fall/winter than pre-project conditions. This has impacted the fish resources in the McKenzie sub-basin, especially Willamette spring Chinook salmon and bull trout, both species of national and regional significance. The total project is estimated to cost $72,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Began work on diversion tunnel and gate. The first contract was awarded in August 2000 for the procurement of the gate structure and the opening of the diversion tunnel. 51. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Modifications to Structures and Operations of Constructed Corps Projects to Improve the Quality of the Environment, Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended. This program provides the authority to modify existing civil works projects to restore the environment. A non-federal entity is required to sponsor the project. The project must accomplish restoration by modifying a Corps project or operation of a Corps project, or be located on Corps project lands. The project must be feasible and consistent with the authorized purpose. The non-federal sponsor generally must assume responsibility of the operation and maintenance associated with the project. Planning studies, detailed design, and construction costs are shared by the Corps 75 percent and nonfederal sponsor 25 percent. Total project costs cannot exceed $6.7 million with the federal share limited to $5,000,000 without specific congressional authorization. See Table 28-L for expenditures under Section 1135 during the fiscal year. Three projects were under construction as follows: Clatskanie River, OR Location: Near the mouth of Beaver Slough, at the head of Westport Slough, a side channel of the lower Columbia River. The site is two miles west of the town of Clatskanie, and about 70 road miles northwest of Portland, Oregon. Project description: The project entails reconnecting Westport Slough to Beaver Slough by placing a large 8-ft x 12-ft corrugated steel culvert through the levee plug. The interchange of water, increased flows, and increased circulation will improve fish habitat and water quality in Westport Slough and reestablish a crucial link for fish migration to spawning and rearing areas. Reestablishing the connection between the Westport Slough and Beaver Slough will also allow recreational boating access for canoes and kayaks. The are will also be planted with native vegetation Local cooperation: Columbia Soil and Water Conservation District, in cooperation with the Lower Columbia Watershed Council, signed a project cooperation agreement on July 25, 2000. The project was funded by a combination of sources including the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, the Washington Department of Ecology Coastal Protection Fund and the Lower Columbia River Estuary Program. Operations during fiscal year: Construction was completed on the culvert in September 2000. The project area will be planted with native vegetation in FY01. Fern Ridge Marsh, OR Location: This project modification is located at the Fern Ridge Lake project on the Long Tom River, a Tributary of the Willamette River approximately 6 miles west of Eugene, Oregon. Project description: The Fern Ridge Marsh Restoration Project entails marsh restoration and management actions on 347 acres in the western portion of the Fisher Butte Management Unit (West Fisher Butte sub-unit) at Fern Ridge Lake Project. The restoration will restore and provide for management of 347 acres of marsh habitat via construction of 7 water control structures, 15,900 lineal feet of 28-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 dikes and rock dikes (carp excluders) within the drawdown zone of Fern Ridge Lake Project. The general intent of the proposed action is the restoration of a more diverse and productive marsh plant and wildlife community in areas currently dominated by reed canarygrass. This species is an exotic plant found in extensive stands in shallow water areas around the reservoir perimeter. The total project cost, including lands, is estimated at approximately $540,000. Local cooperation: The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife signed a local cooperation agreement for the project on July 19, 1999. Operations during fiscal year: Construction continued from FY99. The project is substantially complete. However, given the short construction window, several small actions will continue into FY01. Lower Amazon Creek Wetlands Restoration, OR Location: This project modification is located along Amazon Creek at the western edge of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Amazon Creek is a major drainage channel for Eugene, conveying flows into the Long Tom River, a tributary of the Willamette River. Project description: Prior to settlement in the 1850's, seasonal wet prairie habitat dominated the landscape of the lower Amazon Creek basin and much of the Willamette Valley. Since then, nearly all of this wetland type has been lost to agriculture and urban uses. The Amazon Creek Flood control Project built by the Corps in the 1950's further degraded the wetland hydrology when the creek and connecting drainages were channelized and lined with levees. It is estimated that less than one percent of the Willamette Valley's historic wet prairies remains today. The lower Amazon Creek Wetlands Project will restore the historic hydrology and vegetation community to almost 400 acres of wet prairie. All of the land within the project area is owned by the City of Eugene and BLM, having been acquired for wetland protection and restoration purposes. The total project cost, including lands and recreation facilities, is estimated at approximately $6.2 million. Phase I involves removing existing levees along Amazon Creek and associated drainages and restoring the channels more natural meandering stream configurations. New levees will be set back around the margin of the wetland restoration area to maintain the flood control function of the project. Interior wetland areas will now be subject to the high frequency flooding that occurred prior the flood control project. The new levees will be seeded with a combination of native upland grass species. A slotted weir will be constructed to maintain the complex flow relationship between the connected channels. Culverts, some gated, will also be installed to maintain drainage and to allow manipulation of surface hydrology for wetland management purposes. Disturbed areas along the stream channels and the old levee footprints will be seeded and planted with native wet prairie, emergent marsh and vernal pool species. The total cost for this phase is approximately $2.0 million. Phase II involves removal of non-native plant materials throughout the entire project area and replacement with native wet prairie plants. A major portion of this effort is propagation of native plants and seeds. Phase 11 will also include modification of surface hydrology through filling and restoration of old agricultural drainage channels draining into Amazon Creek. Phase III construction of recreation facilities will occur in Summer 2001. Facilities will include access points, viewing structures, interpretive displays and trails. Local cooperation: The City of Eugene signed a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the project on October 26, 1998. The project is also supported by the Bureau of Land Management under its West Eugene Wetlands Project. In 1999 the City of Eugene requested that the agreement be modified to include the addition of recreation facilities in accordance with recent Corps guidance. The modified PCA is scheduled to be signed in Spring 2001. Operations during fiscal year: Phase I was completed in November 1999. Initiated construction of Phase 11. Restoration and Protection of Aquatic Ecosystems to Improve the Quality of the Environment, Pursuant to Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Public Law 303, 104'" Congress, as Amended. In addition to general requirements, each project is limited to a Federal statutory expenditure of not more than $5,000,000 per year. The non-Federal share of the costs shall be 35 percent, however, the entire non-Federal share of the total project cost may be credited work-in-kind. See Table 28-L for expenditures under Section 206 during the fiscal year. No projects were under construction during the FY. General Investigations 52. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,161,676 of which - $1,163 was for navigation studies, $553,500 for Special Studies, $9,162 for comprehensive studies, $383,506 for miscellaneous activities, and $216,671 for coordination with other agencies. Contributed 28-27 PORTLAND DISTRICT funds in the amount of $625,761 were expended, of which $79,548 was contributed by the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports for the Columbia River Channel Deepening Study, $67,748 was contributed by the State of Oregon for the Willamette River Basin Review study, $100,608 was contributed by the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services for the Columbia Slough Ecosystem Restoration Study, $220,517 was contributed by Tillamook County for the Tillamook Ecosystem Restoration Study, and $157,340 was contributed for the Planning Assistance to States Program. 53. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Fiscal year costs totaling $258,420 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program: FPMS Unit $52,317; Technical Services $55,188; Quick Responses $7,943; National Flood Proof Committee $5,252; and special studies $137,720. Hydrologic Studies. Crest stage gages were constructed and installed on streams in an ongoing program to record data from flood events. Fiscal year costs were $7,376 to build 80 gages. 54. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Willamette River Temperature Control, OR The project plan consists of improving downstream water temperatures by modifying the existing intake towers at Cougar and Blue River projects. Restoring pre-project temperatures will improve survival rates and increase populations of three important native fish species: the wild stock of Willamette spring chinook salmon, the bull trout, and the rainbow trout. These fisheries once provided important recreational and commercial benefits to the region. Preconstruction engineering and design is estimated to cost $4,596,000 and be completed by March 2000. The construction phase is estimated to cost approximately $70.6 million. Continued design and geotechnical explorations work in support of the intake tower modifications. Fiscal year expenditures were $276,158. Columbia River Channel Improvements Study, OR & WA The project plan consists of deepening a segment of the Columbia and Willamette Rivers by 3 feet to 43 feet. The project area begins at the mouth of the Columbia River and extends upstream to the vicinity of the Port of Vancouver, Washington (approximately river mile 105), and also includes the Lower Willamette River from its confluence with the Columbia River (river mile 101.5) upstream to the vicinity of downtown Portland (approximately river mile 11). Project cost sharing will include requirements for non-Federal interests to pay 25 percent of the project cost during construction, and an additional 10 percent to be repaid over a period not exceeding 30 years. Cost of construction is estimated at $188,319,000. Fiscal year expenditures were $1,243,245 Federal funds and $131,481 contributed funds. Other 55. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disaster Preparedness Program. This program encompasses all the activities associated with preparing for, responding to and recovery from natural disasters. It includes publication of plans and policy documents, training, exercises, coordination with outside agencies and governments, maintaining response supplies and equipment, and the like. Significant activities included flood and earthquake response tabletop exercises for senior level leadership, communication exercise with hand held VHF radios, setting up communication equipment at emergency assembly sites and operation of HF SSB radios. Flood Fight Design workshops were conducted with state and local governments, with results presented to Association of Oregon Counties and professional associations. Public law 84-99. La Nina Climatological Event forecasted an unusually intense flood season with early arrival expected in October 1999. As a result, Tillamook County requested Advance Measures assistance to reduce damages caused during 1996 and 1997. A project was constructed which included 12 six-foot diameter tide gates in the Tillamook Bay levees, development of a log jam in the head water of Dougherty Slough and clearing two channels in the mouth of the Wilson River. The project was completed November 24, 1999 and the first event started that evening. Another flood event December 28-28 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 16, 1999 was also reduced significantly by the project. The project saved an estimated $10,000,000 in damages to the town of Tillamook and Tillamook County. Continuing Eligibility Inspections. The district completed all scheduled annual inspections of flood control works. As part of these inspections, sector engineers discussed and gave advice to local sponsors regarding their local flood plans and application of Public Law 84-99 as it pertains to them. Catastrophic Disaster Response Planning. This initiative was begun in FY98. It requires that a comprehensive set of Operations Plans be developed to cope with a subduction earthquake off the Oregon/Washington coast in the Richter range of 8 to 8.5. Plans were approved by HQUSACE with modifications. See Table 28-M for expenditures during the fiscal year. 28-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 to In Text Sep.30, 2000 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver,WA and The Dalles, OR 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 250,000 17,500 459,423 34,063 250,000 353,704 3,000 7,985 17,500 4,693,885 30,558 4,700,058 926 4,186 400,000 426,000 443,000 424,000 393,612 432,929 443,781 423,401 175,449,807 " 175,439,296 ' 180,140,385 180,130,818 2,043,713 ' 2,043,713' 10,664,673 10,663,538 28,349,304 2 28,349,304 2 22,278,000 14,280,550 16,136,000 18,265,000 424,803,846 20,387,161 14,105,152 18.209,097 18,228,597 424,743,539 1 665,954 665,954 14,000 17,973 13,000 12,526 4,000 4,646 14,000 1,071,000 13,784 1,070,716 4,000 286,000 741,000 7,733 285,994 741,561 2,880,000 6,325,000 6,361,500 7,133,000 3,006,465 6,307,009 6,381,320 7,113,210 636,000 657,000 290,000 578,000 635,048 657,103 290,041 570,010 941,252 941,252 5,745,087 5,744,457 220,283 220,283 8,651,877 8,651,687 24,913,661 6 24,913,661 6 173,335,353 ' 173,315,169 ' 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,509 5,989,509" 15,773,359' 15,763,446 150,000 52,024 28-30 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 to In Text Sep.30, 2000 9. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds) 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 12. Port Orford, OR 13. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 14. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Skipanon Channel, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,407,000 4,413,093 3,006,000 3,018,236 1,730,000 1,724,174 849,000 24,288 3,181,000 3,182,478 637,000 47,439 868,554 5,678,200 5,666,808 471,853 4,647,( 4,649,( 49, 329,000 127,000 224,000 133,000 325,948 130,912 224,184 130,982 3,000 32,000 10,925 30,512 10,000 233,000 12,741 231,484 411,000 509,000 767,000 446,000 439,767 511,626 768,999 430,018 898,000 1,072,000 87,000 557,000 909,712 993,486 165,547 563,828 198,000 283,000 262,000 297,000 230,940 279,350 267,734 291,933 132,000 189,000 159,000 1,273,000 158,565 189,237 159,623 1,272,419 37,866,092 " 37,866,092 '" 000 119,235,918 " 648 119,222,553 " 2,335,966 2,335,966 --- 3,986,680 739 3,911,796 693,366 ' 693,366 12 9,087,987 " 9,085,857 " 367,364 367,364 1,990,717 1,988,725 758,692 '" 758,692 1 7,627,217 7,608,733 4,156,252 " 4,156,252 '" 19,843,394 '6 19,842,082 16 635,783 635,783 29,502,212 17 29,502,212 ,7 17,559,384 '" 17,554,272 Im 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 280,854 280,854 5,416,064 5,415,264 28-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 to In Text Sep.30, 2000 16. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 17. Umpqua River, OR 18. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 19. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 20. Yaquina River, OR 24. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR 25. Blue River Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Costl Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,000 4,981 5,000 21,000 297,000 8,807 21,804 292,250 436,000 1,392,000 977,000 716,000 443,911 1,393,683 976,853 707,546 786,000 690,000 487,200 552,000 696,184 865,491 498,267 553,632 2,487,000 2,268,000 6,410,000 644,650 2,499,188 2,259,405 6,420,500 639,447 -278,000 -67,000 -118,579 -65,116 913 837,000 769,000 807,000 837,800 835,902 755,008 818,099 825,496 230,000 251,000 215,000 192,000 250,095 246,491 220,207 201,315 28-32 22,434,827 19 22,434,827 '" 7,103,082 20 7,097,712 21 2,839,799 2,839,799 17,718,877 2) 17,718,877 2 35,321,093 35,357,088 2,500,677 2,500,677 520,005 22 520,005 11 24,892,018 2" 24,888,894 23 234,794 234,794 19,242,046 24 19,242,046 24 51,226,408 2 51,220,118 2 12,005 12,005 28,800 28,800 1,463,694 " 1,463,694 5 91,642,489 91,642,489 11,168,915 a 11,147,026 32,038,225 2, 32,038,225 26 4,870,299 4,869,227 53 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 to In Text Sep.30, 2000 26. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 27. Dorena Lake, OR 28. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 29. Fall Creek Lake, OR 30. Fern Ridge Lake, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 31. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR & WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 33. Scappoose Drainage District, OR 34. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost 931,000 696,000 819,000 941,000 954,616 680,606 828,078 959, 180 458,000 935,000 653,000 562,200 482,749 893,215 700,441 570,537 473,000 1,203,214 74,000 302,000 454,000 887,209 495,882 413,224 583,000 1,175,000 432,000 583,200 601,053 1,131,573 467,066 595,746 1,324,000 1,210,000 807,700 1,054,000 1,343,905 1,165,721 856,142 1,060,382 130,000 -10,000 111,318 28,260 10,200 0 25,000 10,160 3,650 00 322,000 9,624 104,250 6,635 34,000 300,000 840,000 57,549 243,182 707,866 1,364,000 308,000 281,100 227,000 1,390,176 311,026 304,912 224,989 161,000 2,517 30,000 18,600 805,000 881,075 0 116,030 -10,000 7,227 181,000 198,469 -29,000 11,382 2,790 355,000 351,834 -2,071 4,013,123 27 4,013,123 " 18,020,288 2, 18,017,053 2, 14,568,262 29 14,568,262 29 12,021,660 12,018,199 109,853,579 109,682,990 22,118,264 ' 22,118,264 '" 11,556,871 11,555,857 8,685,635 " 8,685,635 * 24,545,898 12 24,542,204 12 52,666 52,666 21,524,745 21,201,868 114,450 6,635 112,868,000 112,677,907 3,703,112 3,703,112 4,500,100 4,497,561 4,121,487 4,121,487 --- 24,971,816 "' 24,971,325 33 209,000 5,907,709 120,425 5,815,802 28-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 to In Text Sep.30, 2000 35. Willow Creek Lake, OR 39. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 40. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR & WA 41. Cougar Lake, OR 42. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 43. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 44. Hills Creek Lake, OR 45. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 528,000 530,000 555,000 608,000 536,019 512,150 581,009 607,151 718,000 676,103 15,894,000 15,966,594 7,140,000 6,944,705 70,000 96,720 16,114,000 15,637,786 10,960,000 11,092,955 32,396 50,475 16,604,100 17,009,763 13,238,604 12,870,401 -659 8,972 17,814,100 17,744,149 16,864,731 15,281,432 2,729,000 7,460,079 7,774,442 6,717,000 2,538,734 6,520,182 8,797,936 6,466,146 1,443,000 1,272,000 1,366,200 1,027,400 1,456,129 1,217,890 1,416,843 1,055,993 2,107,000 2,537,000 2,538,200 2,600,000 2,410,295 2,406,655 2,660,104 2,637,380 2,828,000 2,683,000 2,929,600 3,154,800 2,823,012 2,643,533 2,953,897 3,170,392 668,000 743,000 901,900 808,100 672,351 728,183 914,229 811,394 11,850,000 12,122,437 1,591,000 720,230 12,427,000 13,386,500 15,485,1 12,196,731 13,530,020 14,710,d 889,761 4,463 37,260,114 37,260,114 8,017,051 8,009,597 789,836,341 14 789,836,341 3' 333,769,863 " 333,366,445 3 77,154,335 75,034,616 30,417,521 29,695,173 58,636,393 16 58,636,393 ' 24,800,796 ' 24,798,276 62,729,698 62,729,698 50,948,807 41 50,941,684 4' 363,086 363,086 84,005,788 7 84,005,788 31 52,918,103 1 52,884,540 * 45,700,619 45,700,619 16,556,375 " 16,553,560 " 512,400,246 512,400,246 150 248,769,377 742 247,820,831 --- 44,005,128" --- 44,005,128 28-34 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 to In Text Sep.30, 2000 46. Lookout Point - Dexter New Work Lakes, OR Approp. 88,238,395 2 Cost 88,238,395 * Maint. Approp. 6,109,000 4,663,000 4,402,500 4,245,000 91,557,032 " Cost 5,593,477 5,257,357 4,747,792 4,276,796 91,522,955 * 47. Lost Creek Lake, New Work Rogue River Approp. 136,408,150 Basin, OR Cost 136,408,150 Maint Approp. 3,831,000 3,988,000 3,910,300 4,254,100 64,480,018 4 Cost 3,864,327 3,820,931 4,050,722 4,228,512 64,404,668 4" 48. The Dalles Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Celilo, Approp. 303,260,288 " WA and OR Cost 303,260,288 " Maint. Approp. 11,820,000 11,728,000 12,323,000 12,538,500 226,190,170 U Cost 12,609,899 11,614,994 12,508,235 12,313,384 225,880,563 w, Major Rehab. Approp. 1,893,000 4,637,000 5,560,000 4,272,000 16,362,000 Cost 1,741,337 4,297,713 5,741,481 4,171,644 15,952,175 49. Columbia River New Work Fish Mitigation, Approp. 47,391,000 57,719,000 58,749,000 31,625,000 256,070,000 52 OR and WA Cost 44,279,324 58,545,415 49,673,014 39,759,406 252,438,002 52 50. Willamette River New Work Temperature Control, OR Approp. 3, 181,000 3,181,000 Cost 2,227,934 2,227,934 Footnotes: I. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project.Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds. 11. Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. Includes $36,000 under Code 71 1. 13. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 14. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds 15. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 16. Includes $21,000, Wedderbumrn Study Funds. 17. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 18. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 19. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 20. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 28-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 to In Text Sep.30, 2000 Footnotes (Cont'd) 21. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 23. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 24. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 25. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 26. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 27. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 28. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $101,262 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 29. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 32. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 33. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 34. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $6,000 power units funds. 35. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 37. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 38. Includes $983,934 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds 39. Includes $82,408 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 40. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 41. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 42. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 43. Includes $991,562 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 44. Includes $978,478 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 45. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 -22 funds. 46. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 47. Includes $936,376 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 48. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $861,852 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 50. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 51. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 52. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 53. Includes $15,694 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 54. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 28-36 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Aug 15, 1985 Construction of a new navigation lock just south of existing lock. Nov 17, 1986 Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. CHETCO RIVER, OR Mar 02, 1945 To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Oct 27, 1965 Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Dec 04, 1981 Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty S. system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. Oct 31, 1992 Assume responsibility for O&M of the approximately 200-foot-long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR Feb 27, 1911 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Jul 25, 1912 Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Jul 27, 1916 Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. Aug 08, 1917 For the Cathlamet channel. Sep 22, 1922 Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Mar 04, 19232 Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Mar 03, 1925 Depth of 25 feet.and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Mar 03, 1927 Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. Jul 03, 1930 For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. Sep 06, 1933 , A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. Aug 30, 1935 A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Aug 30, 1935 Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. P.L. 99-88 P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 817 ,77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89' Cong., Ist Sess. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. H. Doc. 1278, 61 st Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' No Prior Report H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., Ist Sess.' H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., I st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., Ist Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73d Cong., Ist Sess. l 28-37 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 1935 Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. 4. Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Jun 20, 1938 Channel 8 feet deep. Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Sep 03, 1954 Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Mar 03, 1905 Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Sep 03, 1954 Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore. 9 Jul 30, 1983 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. May 24, 1995 Lower a 500' section of south jetty at river mile 7. H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., Ist Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cog, 2d Sess Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong.,lst Sess. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 98-63 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662, as amended COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Aug 26, 1937 Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.l Mar 02, 1945 Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. Jul 24, 1946 Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess, from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Jul 24, 1946 Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Jul 24, 1946 Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Jul 24, 1946 Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., I st Sess. 1 by 800 feet long. 28-38 5. 6. 7. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Proiect and Work Authorized Documents COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Nov 5, 1990 Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation with the City of Hammond, Oregon. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Jan 21, 1927 Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. Jul 03, 1930 A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. Aug 30, 1935 For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Jul 24, 1946 Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. Jun 30, 1948 A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Dec 31, 1970 Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. Nov 13, 1995 Deepening the authorized channel by 2 feet and expanding one turningbasin. The entrance would be 47 feet deep to River Mile (RM) 1 and the inner channel 37 feet between RM 1 and 15. Aug 26, 1937 An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Mar 02, 1945 Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 23, 1962 An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2turning basins of same depth. Oct 23, 1962 A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from at Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basinVancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. Aug 17, 1999 Deepen the existing navigation channel by three feet. P. L. 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st Cong, 2d Sess. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong., I st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., Ist Sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. I S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 646, 80th Cong.,2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 104-46 H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.I H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., I st. Sess.' H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' P.L. 106-53 28-39 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents COQUILE RIVER, OR Jun 25, 1910 Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. Mar 02, 1919 For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Jul 03, 1930 Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Aug 30, 1935 Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Mar 02, 1945 For 13-foot depth from sea to a point I mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong.,lst Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 4, Food Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' DEPOE BAY, OR Aug 26, 1937 Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth I st Sess. and 30 feet wide. Mar 2, 1945 Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and Ist Sess. 30 feet wide. July 14, 1960 Construction of entrance channel 8 feet deep and Sec. 107 of R&H Act 1960, approved 50 feet wide, concrete breakwater and. Feb. 1965. stone spending beach PORT ORFORD, OR Oct 27, 1965 Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dec 31, 1970 Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. Oct 3 1, 1992 Maintain the authorized navigation channel including those portions of the channel within 50 feet of the port facility. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Sep 03, 1954 Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Sep 19, 1890 Build two high-tide stone jetties. Jun 25, 1910 Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. Mar 03, 1925 12-foot deep channel. Jul 03, 1958 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Oct 22, 1976 Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Oct 01, 1980 Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong.,2d Sess H. Doc 151, 91st Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess.' Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367 28-40 II. 12. 13. 14. 10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Jul 03, 1930 Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Aug 26, 1937 Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Jun 30, 1948 Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Jul 26, 1912 Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging Mar 04, 1913 channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Mar 02, 1919 Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Mar 03, 1925 Abandon Bay City Channel and present project x (600-foot extension classified of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Mar 02, 1945 Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Jun 30, 1948 Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet. Sep 03, 1954 Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Oct 27, 1965 Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. 17. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Sep 22, 1922 North Jetty, 7,500 feet long Jan 21, 1927 Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. Jul 03, 1930 A short south jetty Aug 30, 1935 A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Jun 20, 1938 Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Mar 02, 1945 Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Mar 02, 1945 Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide , and 300 feet long at inner end. Jun 30, 1948 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Sep 03, 1954 Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. 5 H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., Ist Sess.' H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., Ist Sess.' H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.) H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.1 S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., Ist Sess' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9,72d Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong.,3d Sess.' S. Doc. 86,76th Cong., Ist Sess.' S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Jun 25, 1910 For purchase and rehabilitation of system and H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., Ist Sess. construction of concrete division wall. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 Aug 08, 1917 Deepening of locks. H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.' Jun 26, 19346 Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Mar 02, 1945" Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. 28-41 15. 16. 18. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Mar 02, 1919 Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and Ist Sess. dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. Mar 02, 1945 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., Ist Sess.' as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Jul 24, 1946 Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. Jul 03, 1958 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., Ist Sess.' extension of jetties at entrance. Jul 14, 1960 A small boat basin, south shore. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 YAQUINA RIVER, OR Mar 4, 1913 Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Creek. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Oct 23, 1962 Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Mar 07, 1974 Authorizes construction of project but no operation for P.L. 93-251 irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. 20. 24. 25. May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Jun 28, 1938 Earthfill dam. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DORENA LAKE, OR Jun 28, 1938 Earthfill dam. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Oct 23, 1962 Roller compacted concrete dam. Oct 07, 1970 Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended 25. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 91-439 28-42 26. 27. 28. 19. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 29. May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Jun 28, 1938 Earthfill embankment dam Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Oct 23, 1962 Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Jun 4, 1993 Construction of waterfowl impoundments. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. Sec 1135, P.L.99-662 as amended LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening levee. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Oct 27, 1965 Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. HI. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-88 F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) 28-43 30. 31. May 17, 1950 32. Aug 15, 1985 33. Jun 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 34. Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 35. 39. Aug 30, 1935 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 20, 1937 Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Mar 07, 1974 Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Aug 22, 1984 Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. Oct 1992 Authorizes transfer of lands to town of North Bonneville. 1992 Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. 40. Nov 1, 1988 Oct 12, 1996 41. May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 1992 42. June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 1992 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Authorizes project for mitigation of lost treaty fishing access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Boundary adjustments. COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power Strube Lake reregulating dam. Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam. with power Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR May 17, 1950 Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Sep 03, 1954 Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Jul 14, 1960 Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended P.L. 93-251 P.L. 98-396 P.L. 102-396, Sec. 9147 P.L. 102-486 Title IV of P.L. 100-581 P.L. 104-303, Sec. 512 39. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780. P.L. 87-874 P.L. 102-486 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong.2d Sess. P.L. 102-486 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780, F. C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 28-44 43. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation. and power Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. John Day waterfowl management area. Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake as reregulating dam. Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. P.L. 102-486 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 102-486 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 102-486 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 102-486 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967 P.L. 102-486 28-45 1992 44. May 17, 1950 1992 45. Mar 24, 1965 1992 46. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 1992 47. Sep 21, 1962 Oct 15, 1966 1992 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation. and power Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 1992 Authorizes direct funding from Secretary of Interior to operate and maintain power facilities in the Pacific Northwest and improvements and replacements to the power generation facilities. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended P.L. 102-486 COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR and WA Jul 19, 1988 Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities. P. L. 100-371 WILLAMETE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR Oct 12, 1996 Authorized modifications to intake towers to benefit P.L. 104-303 fish habitat. Aug 17, 1999 Increased authorized cost. P.L. 106 Footnotes: 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration. 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred. 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive 28-46 49. 50. 48. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR Completed 2,000 26,237 AstoriaTurning Basin, OR' Completed 1977 870,139 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR' Completed 1985 1,173,524 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks Completed 1944 1,081,806 16,648 and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA' Completed 1971 171,467 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR' Completed 1985 1,197,300 Clatskanie River, OR 2 Completed 1969 19,2400 194,8961 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA' 1986 1,589,231 Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR Completed 1991 350,23811 2,152,914 Cowlitz River, WA Completed 1985 277,436" 1,474,036 Cushman-Mapleton Channels Completed 1975 329,423 (Siuslaw River), OR' Deep River, WA Completed 1963 15,384 32,768 Depoe Bay, OR' Completed 1971 145,588' Elochoman Slough, WA2 Completed 1990 18,641 7 196,864 Grays River, WA2 Completed 1941 2,500 35,670 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' Completed 1977 519,0907 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Completed 1961 1,154,162" Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR' Completed 1963 15,281 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA' Completed 1986 302,000 Lake River, WA Completed 1983 2,700 58,127 Lewis River, WA Completed 1985 58, 132 685,677 Long Tom River, OR Completed 4,000 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Completed 25,000 Multnomah Channel, OR2 Completed 1982 437,669" Nehalem Bay, OR Completed 1987 302,006 t "' 55,195 Nestucca River, OR Completed 6,000 Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR Completed 1963 16,881 90,514 Salmon River, OR2 Completed 1949 2,145 Smith River, OR2 Completed 1974 143,120 205,130 Skamokawa Creek, WA Completed 1991 2,400 436, 185 South Channel, Government Island, OR' Completed 1985 119,800" South Slough (Charleston), OR' Completed 1970 26,821 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR'2 Abandoned 1939 3,903,780 559,858 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA"' Abandoned 1957 4,716,205 2,833,888 Tongue Point, OR' Completed 1992 2,807,87619 Umatilla Harbor, OR14 Abandoned 1952 Westport Slough, OR 2 Completed 1966 16,276 171,909 Willamette River above Portland and Completed 1985 862,918 17,900,293 Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Completed 1985 1,616,369 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR' Completed 1979 891,695" Yaquina River, OR I Completed 1971 195,31316 Youngs and Claskanie River, OR Completed 2,000 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR2 Completed 1979 9,348 34,449 7.5 MCY Standby Time Completed 1996 4,314,000 28-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-C (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Footnotes: 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 4.In cludes $23,489 for previous project. 14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 17. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 18. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for previous project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $1,776,008 contributed funds. TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1,Cowlitz County, WA Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Diking District I and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1939 1941 1942 1943 1940 1940 1940 1941 1941 1951 1939 1942 1941 1942 1942 1961 1940 163,397 163,291 69,724 574,123 25,609 25,609 161,381 258,795 26,810 169,542 240,939 33,080 25,773 18,789 158,419 91,652 61,186 28-48 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN (Cont'd) Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,774 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,0341 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 Port of Kalama, WA I Completed 99,844 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA I Completed 1985 504,642" Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District I, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA l Completed 1985 250,000 Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA Completed 1995 42,036,000 28-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3, 131,944 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA' Completed 236,860 Hayden Island, OR Inactive Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1964 1,499, 186 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Active 1961 35,265 Rainier Drainage District, OR Completed 1967 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR Completed 1954 154,012 5 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Completed 1966 674,137 Vancouver Lake Area, WA Deferred 1981 889,391 Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Inactive 1971 48,619 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Completed 1973 1,803,488 Woodson Drainage District, OR Completed 1964 162,500 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Completed 1960 1,214,300 6 Mill Creek, Salem, OR Completed 1993 175,8001' Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Completed 276,700 Whelton Ditch, OR Inactive 1967 39,624 ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR7 Abandoned 1950 23,439 Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Completed 23,050 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Completed 1967 106,198 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Completed 1957 104,921 Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Completed 1959 182,655 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR' Completed 42,761 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Completed 1952 70,845 * Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase 1) Deferred 1982 1,307,216 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Completed 22,963 Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 Completed 1988 106,2501 John Day River (West), OR' Completed 1986 127,800 Johnson Creek, OR Active 1981 170,245 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR' Completed 1985 29,500 28-50 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL (Cont'd) McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Completed Miami River, OR' Completed Yaquina River, OR Completed Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Completed Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Completed Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Completed Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Completed Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR9 (a) Riverside Area Units Deferred (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) Completed (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Completed Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR9 Completed Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR 2 Completed Rogue River, OR' Completed Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Completed Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA' Completed Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR' Completed Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Completed Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR 2 Completed Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Completed Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' Completed Tualatin, OR Completed Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Completed Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' Completed Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Completed Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Completed West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR' Completed Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' Completed 1966 1948 1955 1952 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1985 1994 1961 1984 1985 1985 1952 1952 1986 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,716"' 86,230 288.447 435,00012 365,000' 215,939 176,351 92,500 121,273 1,803,094 33,835 154,600 428,881 45,677 176,000 30,000 Footnotes: 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds. 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds. 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 7. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-85. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887. 8. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds. 9. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974. 10. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 11. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 12. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $31,031 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $98,313 contributed funds. 28-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds Completed 1969 185,000 Bonneville, OR Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Inactive 1994 5,799,926 Dredging, OR & WA TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954, 114 Chetco River, OR 1997 235,353 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District i, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,001 2 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,9923 28-52 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-G (Cont'd) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, OR 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24, 145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 Footnotes: I. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir. 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 28-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 2000 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 424,743,539 453,092,843 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 424,856,621 453,790,670 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 424,880,941 454,480,944 TABLE 28-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 21 OF TEXT) Project Date Survey Conducted Baker Bay, WA Oct 2000 Tillamook, OR Aug 2000 Hood River Boat Basin, OR Feb 2000 Chinook, WA Oct 2000 Siuslaw River - Florence to Mapleton, OR Sep 2000 Hammond Boat Basin, OR Apr 2000 Cathlamette Bay, OR Mar 2000 Elochoman Slough, WA Dec 2000 TABLE 28-J WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (SEE SECTION 18 OF TEXT) Usable Lock Dimensions ..................... ..................... Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet 1 Lift of each lock ...................... ...... ........ . Lock I (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water ................................ Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation ..................... .................... Rock Kind of Dam ................... .................... Fixed3 Type of Construction ................... ..................... Concrete Year of Completion ................... .................... 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost ...................... ...................... Unknown; purchase price $375,000 Footnotes: 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states of water, is at upper end of canal basin. 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland General Electric Co. 3. The dam is owned by private parties. 28-54 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-K FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. Ft./Sec. Acre/feet 24. Applegate Lake, OR January 14, 2000 4,780 8,649 25. Blue River Lake, OR November 25, 1999 13,200 32,355 26. Cottage Grove Lake, OR January 11, 2000 5,620 18,100 41. Cougar Lake, OR November 26, 1999 12,200 30,330 42. Detroit Lake, OR November 26, 1999 38,700 107,380 27. Dorena Lake, OR January 10, 2000 17,300 40,950 29. Fall Creek Lake, OR January 10, 2000 13,800 35,950 30. Fern Ridge Lake, OR January 14, 2000 9,210 48,400 43. Foster Lake, OR November 26, 1999 27,900 26,140 43. Green Peter Lake, OR November 26, 1999 45,600 112,580 44. Hills Creek Lake, OR January 10, 2000 11,200 45,320 46. Lookout Point Lake, OR January 10, 2000 20,600 75, 120 47. Lost Creek Lake, OR January 11, 2000 6,110 19,409 TABLE 28-L WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED Fiscal Year Costs Project Status Federal Non-Federal Total Beach Erosion Control Projects Pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 874, 87th Congress, As Amended (See Section 23 of text) Lincoln City Highway 101, OR Rock Creek, Highway 101, OR US 101, Beverly Beach, OR Coordination 21,265 80,810 1,332 4,988 Total Section 103 108,395 21,265 80,810 1,332 4,988 108,395 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended (See Section 22 of text) Port of Brookings (Chetco), OR Port of Morrow, OR Coordination X 79,549 2,042 9,902 Total Section 107 91,493 96,801 - 1,189 95,612 176,350 853 9,902 187,105 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (See Section 38 of text) Dougherty Slough, Jefferson, OR Keizer, OR Klickitat, WA Lewis County, WA Lewis River, Woodland, WA Little Pudding River, Marion County, OR 36,604 325,505 6,919 420 5,148 15,424 1188,,112255 36,604 343,630 6,919 420 5,148 15,424 28-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-L (Cont'd) WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED Fiscal Year Costs Project Status' Federal Non-Federal Total Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 (Cont'd) Malhuer Basin, Harney County, OR F 9,820 --- 9,820 Mill Creek, The Dalles, OR X 4,544 --- 4,544 Peninsula Drainage District # 1, OR X 26,185 16,618 42,803 Salem, OR F 109,670 89,285 198,955 Scio, OR X 32,072 --- 32,072 Siuslaw River, Mapleton, OR X 29 --- 29 Coordination 7,947 --- 7,947 Total Section 205 580,287 124,028 704,315 Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (See Section 38 of text) Coordination 10,252 --- 10,252 Total Section 14 10,252 --- 10,252 Project Modifications for Improvement of the Environment Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended (See Section 51 of text) Amazon Creek Wetlands, OR C 1,044,208 74,469 1,118,677 Clatskanie River, OR C 104,605 18,518 123,123 Fern Ridge Lake Marsh Restoration, OR C 131,797 24,467 156,264 Fox Creek, OR D 338 --- 338 Richardson Park, OR D 2.314 --- 2,314 Trestle Bay, OR X -1,000 --- -1,000 Willamette Mission State Park, OR F 102,435 --- 102,435 Initial Appraisals 7,317 --- 7,317 Coordination 10,155 --- 10,155 Total Section 1135 1,402,169 117,454 1,519,623 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to Section 206 of the 1996 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 303, 104th Congress, as Amended (See Section 51 of text) Bowers Rock State Park, OR X 4,604 --- 4,604 Clatskanie River, OR D 34,941 34,941 East Birch Creek Restoration, OR F 115,252 --- 115,252 Eugene Delta Ponds, OR F 164,677 --- 164,677 Gross Creek, Bandon, OR F 33,549 -- 33,549 Springfield Millrace, OR F 164,851 --- 164,851 Trout Creek, OR D 6,497 --- 6,497 Upper Rogue Habitat Protection & Restoration, OR F 114,803 --- 114,803 Preliminary Restoration Plans 39,075 --- 39,075 Coordination 17,972 --- 17,972 Total Section 206 696,221 --- 696,221 1/ Status: C= Construction; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P= Plans and Specifications; X=Fiscal Close Out 28-56 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-M FLOOD CONTROL ACIITIIES WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES (SEE SECTION 55 OF TEXT) Appropriation Contributed 96X3125 Funds Disaster Preparedness Program (Category 100) Planning 366,367 0 Training and Exercise 23,146 0 Facilities -132 0 National Center for Expertise 0 0 Total Disaster Preparedness Program 389,381 0 Emergency Operations (Category 200) Response Operations 9,965 0 Post Flood Response 0 0 Acquisition of Supplies/Equip 0 0 Operational Deployment -250 0 Total Emergency Operations 9,715 0 Rehabilitation (Category 300) Federal Flood Control Works 0 0 Non-Federal Flood Control Works 0 0 Field Investigations 0 0 Initial Eligibility Inspections 42 0 Continuing Eligibility Inspections 12,099 0 Total Rehabilitation 12,141 0 Advance Measures Advance Measure Assistance 449,740 0 Field Investigations 2,711 0 Total Advance Measures 452,451 0 Reimbursement Activity Other Agencies 0 0 Other Corps Offices 96,904 0 Total Reimbursement Activity 96,904 0 28-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING COLUMBIA RIVER NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Promject Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WA - Lake Bonneville (See Section 39 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Umatilla (See Section 45 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK(NEW) Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock)(Second Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 86 Feet 675 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 19 Feet Andesite March 1993 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet I @ 5,000 kw I 48,000 kw 1 59,500 kw 8 60,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 28-58 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING COLUMBIA RIVER (Cont'd) NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Celilo (See Section 48 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 28-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-0 96-89X4045 APPROPRIATION BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Expenditures Total Cost To Project FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Bonneville 88,179 197,994 416,161 1,668,674 3,082,172 5,453,180 Columbia River Fish Mitigation 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 6,000,000 Cougar 0 6,558 9,955 3,992 2,287 22,792 Detroit 0 13,116 143,205 254,025 336,523 746,869 Green Peter 0 12,124 85,027 835,485 1,558,120 2,490,756 Hills Creek 0 7,544 7,463 1,976 28,381 45,364 John Day 8,277 130,229 612,077 1,813,742 1,523,451 4,107,499 John Day Rehab 0 0 157,294 811,937 2,202,667 3,171,898 Lookout 0 15,694 95,001 162,810 598,874 872,379 Lost Creek 0 702 1,621 0 0 2.323 The Dalles 2 226 139 1,882,171 2 646,696 2,229,793 2,033790 11,018,589 Total 8,322,595 2,266,132 4,174,500 7,782,434 11,366,265 33,931,649 TABLE 28-P REPORT ON POWER REVENUE AND POWER GENERATION Revenue from Sale of Electricity by Generation of Electricity Project Bonneville Power Admin in Megawatt-Hours (MWH) Total Total FY00 Since Power FY00 Since Power FY00 MWH Revenues Plant Began MWH Plant Began To BPA Bonneville The Dalles John Day Cougar Detroit/Big Cliff Green Peter/Foster Hills Creek Lookout Point/Dexter Lost Creek Total 12,315,790 10,136,083 11,530,392 432,156 1,851,544 1,956,179 432,516 2,284,312 1,330,006 42,268,988 683,264,945 437,525,665 477,334,428 27,258,969 82,674,399 70,055,387 25,209,590 92,815,215 37,653,4 59 1,933,792,057 5,354,060 7,596,036 10,078,924 179,392 524,442 340,681 169,218 422,082 317,601 24,982,436 261,754,060 307,196,036 336,578,924 4,979,392 23,124,442 11,34340,681 6,069,218 18,322,082 6,717,601 976,082,436 5,323,861 7,578,939 10,058,876 178,59 521,666 338,202 168,675 419,894 313,084 24,901,776 28-60 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-Q INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 36 OF TEXT) Date of Last Rating State/County/Location Sponsor River Inspection (1) State of Oregon Clackamas County Dixon Farm Sleepy Hollow Location Clatsop County Clatsop #15 Dr. Improv. Co. Clatsop Co. Dr. Imp. Co. # 1 Clatsop Co. Dk. Dist. #5 Clatsop Co. Dk. Dist. #7 Youngs River Tucker/Battle Creek Grant Tansy Point Location Warrenton Dr. Dist. #1 Warrenton Dr. Dist. #2 Warrenton Dr. Dist. #3 Svenson Is Dist. Imprv. Co John Day River Road Location Tansy R.R. Location Columbia/Multnomah County Sauvie Island Columbia County Scappoose Dr. Imp. Company Deer Island D. I. Company Rainier Water Imp District Beaver Drainage Improv. Co. Magruder Dr. Improv. Co. Midland Dr. Improv. Co. Marshland Dr. Improv. Co. Webb District Improv. Co. Woodson Drainage District Westland Dist. Improv. Co. Coos County Catching Inlet Dr Dist Deschutes County Bend Ice Boom Douglas County Reedsport Levee Jackson County Bear Creek Lower Clackamas Water Control District Clackamas County Clatsop No. 15, Drainage Improvement Co. Clatsop Co Drainage, Improvement Co No. 1 Clatsop County Diking Clatsop County Diking, District No. 7 Clatsop Co Diking, Improvement Co No. 9 Clatsop Co Diking Improvement Co No. 9 Clatsop Co Diking Improvement Co No. 9 Port of Astoria City of Warrenton City of Warrenton City of Warrenton Svenson Island District Improvement Company Clatsop County City of Warrenton Island Drainage Improvement Company Scappoose Drainage Improvement Company Deer Island Drainage District Rainier Water Improvement District Beaver Drainage Improvement Co., Inc. Magruder Drainage Improvement Co., Inc. Midland Drainage Improvement Co., Inc Marshland Drainage Improvement Co., Inc Webb District Improvement Company Woodson Drainage District Westland District Improvement Company Catching Inlet Drainage District City of Bend City of Reedsport City of Medford Clackamas Sandy Columbia Columbia Columbia Blind Slough Youngs Youngs Youngs Columbia Columbia Skipanon Columbia Columbia John Day Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Catching Slough Deschutes Umpqua Bear Cr 28-61 E F 3/17/00 4/4/00 9/11/00 4/27/00 7/25/00 4/28/00 9/12/00 9/12/00 9/13/00 8/30/00 8/30/00 8/30/00 8/30/00 8/29/00 7/27/00 8/30/00 5/4/00 3/30/00 9/14/00 6/1/00 9/11/00 9/11/00 6/29/00 9/11/00 9/11/00 9/11/00 9/11/00 8/9/00 4/12/00 8/9/00 8/14/00 VG VG E VG F G VG E E E E VG E E E E VG E VG G E VG G VG G VG E E E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 28-Q INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Cont'd) (SEE SECTION 36 OF TEXT) Date of Last Rating State/County/Location Sponsor River Inspection (1) Josephine County Pierce Riffle Pierce Riffle U/S Ext. Rogue River at Grants Pass Lake County Paisley Revetment Lane County Rhododendron Drive Amazon Creek Lincoln County Depoe Bay Mill Four Depoe Creek Linn County Landfill Location Marion County Mill Creek (Salem) Multnomah County Sandy Dr. Improvement Co Multnomah Co. Dr. Dist. #1 Peninsula Dr. Dist. No. 2 Peninsula Dr. Dist. No. I Sandy River at Troutdale Tillamook County Sunset Drainage District McDonald Road Location Wilson River (Hwy 101) West Makinster Road Location Stillwell Drainage District Tone Road Beaver Creek Pacific City Miami River Umatilla County Pendleton Zone 2 Levees Pendleton Levee Zone I Simon Springs Rattlesnake Grants Pass Irrigation District Grants Pass Irrigation District City of Grants Pass City of Paisley Lane County Public Works City of Eugene Public Works Department City of Depoe Bay Mill Four Drainage District Lincoln County Drainage District No. I City of Albany City of Salem Public Works Department Sandy Drainage Improvement Company Multnomah County Drainage District No. 1 Peninsula Drainage District No.2 Peninsula Drainage District No. I City of Troutdale Sunset Drainage District Tillamook County Department of Emergency Services Tillamook County Department of Emergency Services Tillamook County Department of Emergency Services Stillwell Drainage District Tillamook County Department of Emergency Services Tillamook County Department of Emergency Services State of Oregon Aeronautics Division Tillamook County Umatilla River Water Control District No City of Pendleton City of Pendleton City of Pendleton Rogue Rogue Rogue Chewaucan Siuslaw Amazon S. Depoe Bay Cr Yaquina Depoe Cr Calapooia Mill Creek Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Sandy Nehalem Nehalem Wilson Wilson Tillamook/Trask Trask Beaver Cr Nestucca Miami R Umatilla Umatilla Umatilla Umatilla 28-62 E E E 8/14/00 8/14/00 8/14/00 6/7/99 8/9/00 8/10/00 8/8/00 8/8/00 8/8/00 6/20/00 6/20/00 4/5/00 4/5/00 4/5/00 3/10/00 3/9/00 8/15/00 8/18/00 8/18/00 8/16/00 8/15/00 8/16/00 8/16/00 8/16/00 7/27/00 6/13/00 6/14/00 6/13/00 6/13/00 VG E E E VG E E G G E E E E PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-Q INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Cont'd) (SEE SECTION 36 OF TEXT) Date of Last Rating State/County/Location Sponsor River Inspection (1) State of Washington Clark County Salmon Creek Location Washougal Area Levees Cowlitz County Port of Kalama Cowlitz Co Cons Dk Imp Cowlitz Co Dr Imp Cowlitz Co Cons Dk Imp Cowlitz Co Cons Dk Imp Cowlitz Co Dk Impt Castle Rock Huntington Avenue Location Lewis County Fulton Location Holder Location Kirkendoll Location Hopkins Creek Location Pacific County Megler Location Wahkiakum County Wahkiakum Co Cons Dk Clark County Salmon Cr Port of Camas/Washougal Columbia Port of Kalama Columbia Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improv Cowlitz District No. 1 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement Columbia District No. I Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improv Lewis District No. 2 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improv Cowlitz District No. 3 Diking Improvement District No. 15 of Columbia Cowlitz County City of Castle Rock Cowlitz City of Castle Rock Cowlitz Lewis County Public Works Department Cowlitz Lewis County Public Works Department Cowlitz Lewis County Public Works Department Cowlitz Lewis County Public Works Department Cowlitz Washington State Department of Transportation Columbia Consolidated Diking District No. I of Wahkiakum County Columbia (1) E= Excellent VG = Very Good G - Good F = Fair P = Poor 28-63 6/18/00 8/30/00 9/19/00 3/16/00 7/6/00 6/6/00 7/6/00 6/6/00 4/20/00 4/20/00 4/6/00 4/6/00 4/6/00 4/6/00 8/31/00 3/14/00 E E E E E VG E E E E E E E E E E SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT* This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Environmental Bellingham Harbor, WA Blair Waterway, Tacoma, WA Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA Friday Harbor, WA Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA Olympia Harbor, WA Project Condition Surveys Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA Quillayute River, WA Seattle Harbor, WA Swinomish Channel, WA Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA Other Navigation Activities 29-2 29-2 29-2 29-3 29-3 29-4 29-5 29-5 29-5 29-5 29-6 29-6 29-7 29-7 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. Deepwater Slough, WA Goldsborough Creek, WA Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA Porter Levee, WA Puget Creek, WA Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA Thorton Creek, WA Turning Basin #3, Seattle, WA General Investigations 34. Surveys 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data 36. Preconstruction Engineering and Design Other Activities Shore Protection Shore Protection Activities Flood Control Cedar River, Renton, WA Howard A. Hanson Dam Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Long Road, Chehalis River, WA Mud Mountain Dam, WA Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Stillaguamish, River, WA Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA Willapa River, Raymond, WA Other Flood Control Activities Multiple-Purpose Power 23. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 24. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA 25. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-11 29-11 29-7 37. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) 38. General Regulatory Functions Program 29-15 29-15 29-16 Tables Table 29-A Cost & Financial Statement Table 29-B Authorizing Legislation 29-23 Table 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 29-28 Table 29-D Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects 29-29 Table 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 29-30 Table 29-F Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Power Projects 29-33 Table 29-G Other Authorized Environmental Projects 29-33 Table 29-H Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design Projects 29-33 Table 29-1 Other Authorized Projects 29-33 Table 29-J Deauthorized Projects 29-34 Table 29-K Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA, Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam 29-34 Table 29-L Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 29-35 Table 29-M Environmental Activities Under Special Authorization 29-35 29-1- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 29-12 29-12 29-12 29-12 29-13 29-13 29-13 29-13 29-14 29-14 29-14 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Navigation 1. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; I&J Street Waterway, a channel 100 feet wide and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water for a distance of 3,200 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet. The small-boat basin expansion from 3,900 feet to 5,400 feet at Squalicum Creek Waterway and channel at I&J Street Waterway were constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction costs for these features are recorded in Table 29- C. Project was completed in October 1980. (For further details see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the 40 wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway, 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway, 3 on I&J Street Waterway, and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No.37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted. Sediment sampling and characterization studies were completed for the Squalicum Waterway Federal channel and port berthing areas. A multi-year (FY 2001-05) public notice was issued and the required environmental coordination completed. Maintenance, contract: None. 2. BLAIR WATERWAY, TACOMA, WA Location. The waterway is located within the Port of Tacoma on Commencement Bay in south Puget Sound in the northeast section of Tacoma, approximately 30 miles south of Seattle, WA. Existing project. Improvement consists of modifying 2.6 miles of the existing Federal navigation project for the Blair Waterway by deepening the channel and turning basin to -51 feet mean lower low water - this to accommodate state-of-theart, post Panamax container ships. Estimated project cost is $4,532,000 ($1,956,000 Federal and $2,576,000 non-Federal), with completion in FY 2001. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Port of Tacoma) will provide 50% of the costs allocated to the general navigation during construction and an additional 10% upon project completion. Concurrent with subject project, the contractor will dredge berth areas at 100% sponsor cost. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on September 10, 1999. Terminal facilities. There are many terminal facilities located in Tacoma Harbor which is comprised of Commencement Bay and its waterways. The Blair and Sitcum Waterways provide the primary container ship facilities for the Port of Tacoma. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised dredging contract. New work, contract: Dredging contract work under way. 3. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18444.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23rd Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29-2 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Aerial survey of the Jetty Island habitat development site was performed. Prepared plans and specifications for maintenance dredging and awarded contract. Monitored maintenance dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract for pipeline maintenance dredging, awarded in FY 1999, was completed in December. Dredging of the upstream settling basin resulted in 253,506 cy of shoal material being removed at a cost of $914,626. A portion of the material was rehandled from the city disposal site to the EPA Superfund cleanup site located on the Tulalip Indian Reservation. 4. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island county seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. Concrete floating breakwater (1,600 feet) to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with the Port of Friday Harbor, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. A detailed underwater inspection of the anchorage system for the concrete floating breakwater was performed by the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC). The NFESC recommended the replacement of 20 anchor chain legs and hardware and arranged for work by contract with completion in November 2000. Maintenance, contract: None. 5. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project (including navigation Improvements to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet; and removal of 350- foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). ( For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction was started in April 1990. Completed project features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30-foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point and Junction City turning basins; deepen two downstream local berths; construct fish and initial crab mitigation; deepen last four miles of upstream existing 30-foot channel to 32 feet; and expand Cow Point another 50 feet to accommodate large cruise vessels. 29-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVL WORS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Modification of Union Pacific Railroad bridge was deleted from project scope in 1995. Construction of final crab mitigation, the last remaining project feature, was completed in FY 2000. Completion of project is currently scheduled for early 2001. Estimated project cost is $28,100,000 ($18,200,000 Federal; $9,900,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 35 per cent of improved project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas and assure relocation of utility lines. Terminal facilities. There are 20 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which 5 are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade, they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, paper, wood pulp, aluminum ingots, granite, other break bulk commodities, woodchips, conventional general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government owned vessels. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Coordinated with Port of Grays Harbor (local sponsor), resource agencies, and Grays Harbor pilots. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredges Essayons and Yaquina dredged in the Entrance and Bar Channels, removing 536,952 cy and 209,288 cy, respectively at a cost of $1,268,950 and $513,050, respectively. Dredged material was placed at South Jetty disposal site. Initiated O&M navigation program study of submerged spur off end of North Jetty. Crab mitigation sites were surveyed for juvenile crab to determine mitigation credit. Plans and specifications were prepared for maintenance dredging. Supervised contract work. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor by clamshell dredge was completed at a cost of $2,705,489 with 916,057 cy of material being removed. Maintenance dredging of the outer harbor by hopper dredge was completed at a cost of $1,147,787 with 494,291 cy of material being removed, all of which was placed at the Pt. Chehalis disposal site. Contract was awarded to perform maintenance of approximately 5,000 feet of degraded North Jetty. Total contract cost is $6,200,000 with completion in FY 2001. A continuing contract was awarded for South Jetty rehabilitation with completion in FY 2002. 6. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is 24,inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet Principal features of double lock and dam are set forth in Table 29-K. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The 18 waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, conducting 16,752 lockings, passing 8,579 commercial vessels, 44,014 pleasure vessels, and 1,744,908 tons of commerce. The fishladder passed more than 459,000 fish and there were 1,469,066 project visitors. Prepared plans and specifications for controls replacement for the project 75-ton stiff leg crane, repaving the project circular drive, and window and exit door replacement for the project transformer house. Maintenance, contract: Contracts were initiated for upgrade of the large lock gate machinery, project pumpwell repair, and window and exit door replacement for the project transformer house. 29-4 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT 7. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18456.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend; a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide; and construction of a 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C (East Bay Small Boat Basin). Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1985. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the port used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Olympia, and Grays Harbor, WA, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. Performed water quality monitoring at East Bay Marina during the seasonal periods of poor water quality. A surface inspection of the floating concrete breakwater was performed. Further coordinated with the Port of Olympia on proposed channel maintenance. Maintenance, contract: None. 8. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and channels not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Fiscal year costs were $251,818. Total costs to date are $4,402,497. SURVEYS CONDUCTED Neah Bay, WA Tacoma Harbor, WA Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA January, March 2000 September 2000 June 2000 9. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18440, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett and Bellingham and the State of Washington are cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in their harbors and setting up collection sites for our debris vessel. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 2,700 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: One thousand tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $89,000. Contractor continues to recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition landfill or recycled through other government agencies. 10. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and, maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference 29-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982; in addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. In 1995, the revetment on the downstream end of the ocean spit was extended 200 feet. In 1996, after the river breached the natural spit, the revetment on the ocean spit was extended approximately 1,700 feet to the north and the boat basin training wall was raised from elevation +9.0 to elevation + 16.0 - all under O&M authority. Project was completed in February 1997. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one Quileute Tribe-owned dock at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. There is also a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel. Prepared plans and specifications for contract work. Advertised and awarded a dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract was completed. The entrance channel and boat basin were dredged (79,193 cy) at a cost of $733,111. 11. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay, the 30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to Ist Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150-foot-wide channel from 1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance of East Waterway above the 750-foot section. Turning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 203 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/ outfitting/ drydocking/ conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of channels. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging and deepening contract of the East Waterway was completed in March which resulted in clamshell dredging of 211,717 cy of material at a cost of $6,821,130. Approximately 86,000 cy of the dredged material were contaminated, requiring costly rehandling to a suitable upland disposal site. 12. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, I miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the- Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 29-6 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, one is used for handling general cargo; five are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; two are used for handling petroleum products; three facilities are used for log dumps; and two for handling nonmetallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination with Port of Skagit County, Port of Anacortes, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Channel condition surveys were conducted. Prepared plans and specifications for clamshell dredging and supervised the contract. Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded to clamshell dredge 35,000 cy of shoal material at a cost of $196,200. The dredged material was rehandled to a contractor-fiurnished, remediation clean up pilot project in Bellingham Harbor. 13. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; entrance channel at Nabcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblenxund breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including three which are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Frequent condition surveys on the Willapa bar channel were performed at the request of the U.S. Coast Guard. The alignment of the Willapa bar thalweg continues to be a concern for safe navigation. Phase I of a technical study at Willapa Bay to determine if a safe, reliable bar navigation channel is feasible (the report completed in FY 1999) was published in April 2000. Monitored maintenance dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A Bay Center Entrance Channel maintenance dredging contract resulted in 175,000 cy of clean, sandy dredged material to be placed at the Cape Shoalwater unconfined open water disposal site. The material was used beneficially to nourish an eroding off-shore dune line which protects the Shoalwater Tribal Reservation. The optimum dredging and disposal plan incorporated many technical findings of the Phase I report. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Entrance Channel Improvements, Neah Bay, WA, $6,677; Ocean Shores Marina, WA, $14,306; Port of Port Townsend, WA, $8,294 (terminated); Section 107 Coordination, $9,488, a total of $38,765. Shore Protection Shore protection activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 874, 87th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Shoalwater Bay, Tokeland, WA, $97,374. 29-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Flood Control Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 14. CEDAR RIVER, RENTON, WA Location. Project is located along the lower 1 1/4 miles of the Cedar River in the city of Renton, King County, WA, immediately southeast of the city of Seattle. Existing project. Dredging of the lower river channel approximately four feet from the mouth upstream to Logan Avenue bridge (one mile), gradually decreasing the slope upstream another 1/2 mile to meet the existing grade. Raise levees and floodwalls along both banks from the mouth to Williams Avenue 1 1/4 miles to contain the 100 year flood just prior to redredging. The interval for maintenance dredging will be approximately 3 years on average. Estimated total project cost is $9,442,000 ($5,000,000 Federal and $4,442,000 non-Federal). Flood control effort has been completed. Landscaping a mitigation site is the only remaining work to be accomplished. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Renton) will .pay 47% of project implementation costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed May 9, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised contract work. New work, contract: Contract for landscaping underway. 15. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and I mile downstream from mouth of north fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA".) Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1,176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1,206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Project is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Under the dam safety assurance program, the reservoir outlet control tower and bridge were strengthened to withstand the maximum, credible earthquake. Work was completed in FY 1998. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, powerline, and other project features. Stilling basin inspection was accomplished. Work continued on water quality and sediment surveys. Maintenance, contract: Replaced sub-standard metal building with a new structure. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests, and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year inspections were made on Chehalis River at Aberdeen, Green River at Tukwila and Kent, Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Sammamish River at Redmond, Shelton Creek at Shelton, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers at Startup, Swinomish Channel at LaConner, American Lake, Wynoochee Dam and Yakima River at Yakima in Washington State; Lightning Creek at Clark Fork, Placer Creek at Wallace, Coeur d'Alene River at Coeur d'Alene, and St. Joe River at St.Maries in Idaho; and Clark Fork River at Missoula in Montana. Fiscal year costs were $179,600. Total costs to date have been $2,051,611. 17. LONG ROAD, CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. The project is within Lewis County, Washington, immediately south of the city of Centralia. The levee ties into the Interstate Highway 5 embankment near milepost 81. Existing project. The project is a reverse L-shaped levee which includes an 800-foot-long east-west segment extending from the Interstate Highway 5 embankment across a field to the edge of an intermittent wetland. From there it bends north for a 1,300-foot-long north-south segment which parallels the Tacoma Eastern Railroad embankment to tie into high ground at South Street. Levee protection is limited to approximately the 35-to40-year events. The project was 95% complete in FY 2000. Estimated project cost is $467,000 ($303,550 Federal and $163,450 non-Federal) with completion in FY 2001. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Lewis County Flood Control District 2 (Long Road District)) will pay 35% of project costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed April 23, 1999. 29-8 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor. Completed plans and specifications, prepared bid documents and supervised contract work. New work, contract: Work underway by equipment rental contract. 18. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles upstream and southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington".) Existing project (including dam safety assurance improvements to date). Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 432 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Flood control outlet works are in right abutment and permit an authorized, controlled discharge of 17,600 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels, with a maximum capacity discharge of 21,500 cfs. Uncontrolled discharge over the spillway is maximum capacity for 245,000 cubic feet per second. Project affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Original project was completed in June 1953. To date, the Corps has constructed two vista areas, a picnic area, a wading pool, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760- foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Installation of an approximately 400-foot-deep concrete cutoff wall in the core of the dam was completed in November 1990 under the major rehabilitation program. Under dam safety assurance, spillway walls were raised, the dam crest was heightened, river diversion facilities required for excavation for the new tower were completed, the 9-foot diameter and the 23-foot diameter tunnels were refurbished, and a new reservoir outlet tower was constructed. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, hiking trails, vista observation deck, recreation area, and fish facilities. Approximately 22,800 fish were transported from the fish collection facility to the upstream release point. Project staff continues to partially renovate the 40-year-old administration building. Prepared plans and specifications for corrosion control of project water supply tanks. Maintenance, contract: Rehab of fish trap facility was accomplished under contract. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Study is ongoing to identify problem areas with the new dam safety features. Design work for right bank stabilization was initiated. New work, contract: Installed steel armor on the floor of the 23-foot tunnel. 19. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Wynoochee Dam, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Issues relating to project operations were addressed. Regulation instructions were provided for flood control operations. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $428,279. Total costs to date have been $6,179,670. 20. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamnish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel sheet pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through Slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush from the 29-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 entire project along slopes of levee and construct rip rap repair. Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve removal of brush and repair erosion damage with rip rap. 21. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma, WA. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The I Ith Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Project was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of levee. Coordinated annual clean-up with Citizens for a Healthy Bay, a tax-exempt, nonprofit organization.. Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve removal of brush and noxious weeds. 22. WILLAPA RIVER, RAYMOND, WA Location. The project is located in Pacific County, southwestern Washington State. Existing project. The city of Raymond owns and operates a wastewater treatment plant adjacent to the Willapa River. Approximately 300 linear feet of the containment levee between the river and the sewage lagoon was in a damaged condition and the erosion threatened the levee stability. The riverward portion of the levee section has been excavated and rebuilt with embankment material and a protected toe constructed of armor rock and woody debris. The project was physically completed in August 2000. Total project cost is $120,605 ($82,378 Federal and $38,227 non-Federal), with final fiscal requirements remaining. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Raymond) will pay 35% of costs beyond the first $40,000. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed November 23, 1999. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed planning and design analysis, prepared bid documents, and supervised construction contract work. New work, contract: Completed construction contract work by equipment rental. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 29-L Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Bogachiel River, WA, $42,930; Section 14 Coordination, $14,740; Upper Hoh Road, Forks, WA, $0 (terminated); and Willapa Bay, WA, $0 (construction initiated in FY 2000), a total of $57,670. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $1,786,435. Multiple-Purpose Power Projects 23. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. On Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, the river channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. 29-10 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Prescribed testing and replacement of the exciters as part of the power system reliability improvements continued with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts were completed for exterior concrete repairs and for powerhouse chiller installation. Contract for replacement of excitation system has completed the first unit, and continues. Contracts were awarded to finish the visitor center basement and to install powerhouse smoke evacuation equipment. 24. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance work was performed on powerhouse, spillway, dam and equipment. Prescribed testing for power system improvements and replacement DACS continued with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts for service and tailrace deck repair and bridge pier footing repair were completed. Contract for re-roof of the powerhouse and warehouse was awarded. Contracts for the station service transformer replacement and the station service governor electronics retrofit are continuing with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). 25. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation atsite and at downstream plants through storage release. Project is operated as a unit of a comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acrefeet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with a treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water resource development of the Columbia River basin. Dam is a straightaxis concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2,459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 480,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units. A fifth generating unit (Libby Additional Units Project) was completed in 1984 with an additional capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Fabrication of generators for units 6 through 8 is completed and parts have been stored at the site. Project is completed with units I through 5 operational. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. The Libby Reregulating Dam Project provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam. Funds were allocated for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the dam. In FY 1982, all work was terminated due to court direction. The Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1995). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse and equipment. Cleaning of foundation drains began, and continues. Fish hatchery operations continued under contract to the State of Montana. Prescribed testing for power system reliability improvements continued with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts were completed for project road repair construction and for new air compressors supplying air to breakers and governors. Contracts were awarded for replacement of the visitor center heating/ventilation system and for asbestos abatement on the project's water supply system. Design contract for 29-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 modernization of intake crane was underway and initial repairs were begun at year-end. Environmental 26. DEEPWATER SLOUGH, WA Location. The project is located on the Skagit River (South Fork), near Milltown, Skagit County, WA. Existing project. Construct approximately 8,300 linear feet of new dikes, augment and rehabilitate 10,000 linear feet of existing dikes, install two drainage structures, a bridge crossing for Deepwater Slough, provide native species planting, and placement of large, woody debris. Breach the existing dikes in three locations at Milltown Island to restore tidal and riverine influence. Completed project will reconnect portions of the wildlife area to tidal inundation and periodic flooding to re-establish inter-tidal marsh, shrub, and forested communities. Project was physically complete in FY 2000. Monitoring will continue through FY 2005. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements the local sponsor (Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife) has provided 25% of project cost and any project betterments. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on May 7, 1999. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised and administered equipment rental contract. New work, contract: Construction completed by equipment rental contract. 27. GOLDSBOROUGH CREEK, WA Location. The restoration site is located in southwest Washington State, just east of the city of Shelton in Mason County at river mile 2.3 on Goldsborough Creek. Existing project. Dam structure and associated channel degradation/instability have created a bottleneck in a system which hinders upstream and downstream passage of fish. Restoration consists of removing the existing dam, placing fill material downstream, and constructing weirs to allow for fish passage. Habitat features have been incorporated to support ecosystem functions. Estimated project cost (including monitoring) is $5,147,000 ($3,345,000 Federal and $1,802,000 non-Federal), with construction complete in FY 2002. Monitoring will continue through FY 2006. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements the local sponsor (Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife) will provide 35% of project cost. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed July 6, 2000. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications and prepared bid documents. New work, contract: None. 28. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Lake Union to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Lake Washington is fed by the Sammamish and Cedar River systems, and supports large anadromous salmon runs. A fish ladder at the Hiram A. Chittenden Locks provides for upstream migration of returning salmon adults. However, there are significant mortalities among salmon smolt leaving the lake system and passing through the lock chambers to salt water. Project construction reduces outmigrating mortalities. Elements of work included a strobe light system at the large lock entrance to reduce smolt entry into the locks, slower lockages to reduce turbulance, removal of barnacles in the large lock filling conduits, and a smolt slide to pass fish over the spillway gates near the fish ladder. Project was physically complete in FY 2000. Monitoring will continue through FY 2001. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (King County) has provided 25% of project cost. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed in September 1999. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications, prepared bid documents, and supervised contract work. New work, contract: Completed contract work. 29. PORTER LEVEE, WA Location. The project is located at river mile 35 on the left bank of the Green River, 30 miles southeast of Seattle, WA, in King County. Existing project. Restored flow into and out of existing former river meanders/side channels behind the Porter Levee isolated by the construction of the levee. Project purpose provides for eight acres of off-channel habitat similar to the side channel habitat which existed prior to the construction of Howard Hanson Dam. Specific features of the project are 1) upstream and downstream connections between river and old meander/ponds, 2) connections from old meander/pond to existing wetland, 3) revegetate riparian zone with native plants, and 4) remove culvert at Green Valley Road which was blocking fish passage. Project was physically complete in FY 1999. Monitoring will continue through FY 2004. 29-12 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (King County) has provided 25% of project cost. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on June 17, 1999. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed first year of monitoring. New work, contract: None. 30. PUGET CREEK, WA Location. The project is located behind Kellogg Island at river mile 3 on the left bank of the Duwamish River in the city of Seattle, WA. Existing project. The effort restores about 0.5 acre of valuable estuary habitat within the authorized Seattle Harbor project. Development plans include creation of inter-tidal mud flats and a tidal marsh, with associated riparian buffer. By excavating 5,000 cy of materials along the banks of Puget Creek, the Duwamish River estuary will return to its natural shallow water and low bank condition. Project was physically complete in FY 1999. Monitoring will continue through FY 2004. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Port of Seattle) has provided 25% of project cost. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on September 28, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed fiscal requirements. New work, contract: None. 31. SAMMAMISH RIVER WEIR RESTORATION, WA Location. Project is located near upstream end of the Sammamish River in Redmond, WA, 22 miles northeast of Seattle, in Marymoor Park. The Sammamish River (length 13.7 miles) flows downstream from Lake Sammamish into Lake Washington. Existing project. Sammamish River Channel Improvements were constructed in 1965. Project provided major drainage improvement and flood protection for floods after March 1. The river channel was deepened an average of 5 feet and widened an average of 20 feet. Mouths of major tributaries were also deepened and widened. A previous Section 1135 project was completed in FY 1995 at three locations downstream of Redmond, WA. Features included regrading of banks, placement of low flow habitat enhancement elements, and planting of riparian trees and shrubs. Current project provides for modification of the grade control sill (weir) and the right bank of the river adjacent to the sill and upstream for 1,200 feet. Work provides fish passage improvements at the sill and a connected fish and wildlife habitat corridor from Lake Sammamish to the sill. Bank improvements additionally reduce severe bank erosion and water quality problems by channeling public access to designated areas. Construction work was physically complete in August 1998, with monitoring to continue for 5 years. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (King County) provided 25% of the project costs and is responsible for all operation and maintenance activities. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on May 21, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Monitoring was conducted for year two in FY 2000 by Corps staff. New work, contract: None. 32. THORNTON CREEK, WA Location. Project is located in King County, at Lake Washington, in northeast Seattle, WA. Existing project. The project area consists of the portion of Matthews Beach Park which is south of Thornton Creek and which is frequently saturated. Restoration features include: 1) restoration of native riparian vegetation along lower 300 feet of the creek, 2) creation of a fish rearing pond adjacent to the creek with outflow to the creek, 3) diversion of water from a small creek at south end of the park in surface channel to supply pond, 4) planting of native vegetation around pond and along diversion (inflow) channel, 5) "softening" over a lakeshore bulkhead with fill, root wads and rocks, and 6) human access and viewing areas. Project was physically complete in September 1999. Monitoring will continue through FY 2003. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Seattle, Parks and Recreation Department) provided 25% of project costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed September 4, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Monitored biological values, functions, and final planting. New work, contract: None. 33. TURNING BASIN #3, SEATTLE, WA Location. The restoration site is just south of the city of Seattle in King County, WA, near turning basin #3, which is near river mile 6.2 on the left bank of the Duwamish River. Existing project. Restore 6.2 acres of fish and wildlife habitat at the upstream limit of the Seattle Harbor project. Habitat development includes creation of inter-tidal mud flats, 29-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 299000 a tidal marsh, a new meandering stream channel, and "daylighting" the mouth of Hamm Creek into the Duwamish River. The downstream Hamm Creek stream length will be increased from the current 800 linear feet to 2,300 linear feet. Hamm Creek improvements will facilitate fish passage. Project is 95% complete, with minor construction items remaining. Estimated project cost is $2,600,000 ($1,950,000 Federal and $650,000 non-Federal), with completion in FY 2001. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (King County Department of Metropolitan Services (METRO)) will provide 25% of project cost. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on May 17, 1999. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised equipment rental contract. New work, contract: Completed work by equipment rental contract Environmental activities (Section 1135, Public Law 99- 662, as amended; Section 206, Public Law 104-303). See Table 29-M. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $147,694 for navigation studies, $187,124 for flood damage prevention studies, $60,361 for shoreline protection studies, $689,064 for special studies, $464,949 for review of authorized projects, $205,961 for miscellaneous activities, and $287,717 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $2,042,870. In addition, contributed funds were expended for the following: $59,834 for navigation studies, $85,020 for flood damage prevention studies, $355,611 for special studies, $224,565 for review of authorized projects, and $347,203 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $1,072,233. 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies and Indian tribes in flood hazard evaluation, flood reduction methods, and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $44,849 for international water studies, $209,939 for flood plain management services, and $7,991 for hydrologic studies, a total of $262,779. 36. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Table 29-H. Centralia, WA The city of Centralia lies in west central Washington at the confluence of the Chehalis and Skookumchuck Rivers, about midway along the Chehalis River from its source in the Willapa Hills to its mouth at Aberdeen in Grays Harbor. Floods of record on Skookumchuck, Newaukum, and Chehalis Rivers occurred in February 1996. The plan of improvement authorized in P.L. 99-662 would substantially reduce flooding in the Skookunmchuck River valley for the 22 miles between Skookumchuck Dam and the river mouth, including a major portion of Centralia, and provide minor reductions along the Chehalis River downstream from Centralia for about 20 miles to Oakville. The improvement, as recommended in the feasibility report, consisted of structural modifications (flood control outlet tunnel and spillway gate) which would enable the existing, private water supply dam to provide flood control storage during winter months. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY 1988 to refine the project design recommended in the feasibility report. In FY 1990, refinement of project design to a less costly, gated spillway sluice and reevaluation of hydrology, existing local levees and embankments, estimated flood damages, and potential flood reduction benefits were completed. Studies determined that the Skookumchuck Dam modification no longer appeared economically justifiable and further work was suspended. In FY 1992 a wrap-up report presenting results of the technical analyses completed to date was provided to local governments. Following the severe flooding in the Centralia-Chehalis area in 1996 there was a renewed public interest in flood damage reduction. Using state and local funding sources, Lewis County reviewed past study efforts and developed a revised flood damage reduction plan that would combine the authorized dam modification with overbank excavation and flow bypass measures. The revised project would provide substantial benefits to both Centralia and Cbehalis and appeared to be economically justified. In July 1998, Lewis County requested resumption of PED for the project with a view toward preparing a General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement for an expanded project. Work resumed soon thereafter. 29-14 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT Accomplishments during the fiscal year included the completion of the 2-foot topographic maps for Centralia and Chehalis Basins. Performed the geotechnical studies at Skookumchuck Dam for liquefaction analyses. Initiated a contract for restoration and mitigation opportunities within the study area. Performed cultural resource investigations throughout the study area. Processed numerous rights-of-entry for field investigations. Worked on the recon level alternatives for the study in order to select the preferred alternative in FY 2001. Prepared concept level design drawings for the alternative for flood storage at Skookumchuck Dam. Fiscal year costs were $1,479,587. Total costs to date have been $3,409,411. Howard Hanson Dam, WA Howard Hanson Dam is an existing earthfill and rockfill structure located at river mile 64.5 on the Green River, King County, WA, 35 miles southeast of Seattle and 35 miles northeast of Tacoma. Work under Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) commenced in FY 1998 to refine the project design recommended in the feasibility report. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on March 12, 1999. Site surveys and a general model study were initiated in FY 1999. Accomplishments during the fiscal year include coordination with the local sponsor (city of Tacoma Water Division), and continuation of PED activities on the tower, fish passage, and habitat mitigation/restoration sites. Technical reviews and value engineering reviews were initiated. Fiscal year costs were $1,735,274. Total costs to date have been $2,595,034. In addition, $793,063 contributed funds were expended in FY 2000. Total contributed funds expended to date have been $793,688. Other Activities 37. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Fiscal year costs were $135,831, provided for activities required for local and national preparedness. 38. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation $2,687,222 Enforcement 542,296 Other Navigation Regulations 3,854 Appeals 14,152 TOTAL $3,247,524 29-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 1. Bellingham Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Blair Waterway, Tacoma, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 99,293 99,293 1,566,839 1,566,839 3,189,549 3,189,549 29,421 29,421 9,103 9,103 165,000 1,687,000 157,784 1,682,740 95,000 1,788,500 95,000 1,590,788 815,117 1,559,000 1,533,569 607,486 933,473 1,562,712 1,550,729 608,903 6,000 2,624 _ 13,084 2,581 18,885 76,000 49,225 1,006,167 45,369 38,064 563,491 335,098 335,098 -79,105 310,710 5,731,000 9,173,000 10,597,000 20,623,703 5,802,808 6,127,575 13,627,581 20,637,890 2,332,000 2,320,524 3 1,883,500 1,685,788 1,723,745 1,723,745 4 18,661,979 18,661,938 5 116,618 116,618 548,090 548,090 1,575,500 1,575,500 6 509,134 509,134 1,267,881 1,267,881 23,280,248 7 23,177,615 8 178,281,726 178,268,237 9 29-16 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 Minor Rehab. (Contrib. Funds) 6. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Olympia Harbor, WA 9. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 10. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 29,000 14,073 200,000 12,766 201,984 100,000 89,335 7,349,000 6,345,750 6,873,858 7,242,000 7,427,043 6,364,615 6,917,916 7,317,690 40,000 39,964 4,000 35,000 217,927 2,479 33,177 221,721 15,640 15,640 1,000,000 898,000 626,351 627,364 954,534 962,993 630,755 628,750 6,663,584 1,206,000 891,202 6,641,436 1,245,470 897,390 803,917 840,772 29-17 9,592 9,592 10 4,606,145 4,606,145 6,396,000 6,369,759 11 55,889 55,889 4,611,436 4,611,436 144,172,703 144,133,897 7,465,230 7,465,230 250,000 250,000 40,000 39,964 337,709 337,709 1,071,162 1,071,162 12 13 14 15 16 43,337 43,337 26,940,465 26,940,301 17 18 521,850 521,850 26,404,011 26,402,460 20,000 20,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project 11. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Cedar River, Renton, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Long Road, Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 170,335 . _ 170,335 529,000 1,230,000 1,794,091 3,254,349 543,729 1,180,241 1,800,724 3,305,056 17,508,813 19 17,508,652 20 69,333 69,333 _ 2,262,975 _ 2,038,749 238,000 238,000 91,108 234,383 239,049 93,261 250,630 249,796 546,383 2,490,000 1,215,172 2,051,158 553,263 1,487,978 2,222,054 2,050,231 2,357,450 21 2,133,224 22 808,332 808,332 8,877,711 8,875,377 32,000 32,000 379,248 379,248 1,386,955 1,386,955 21,340,073 21,338,810 78,372 78,372 77,500 2,480,011 2,035,300 88,897 1,315,128 2,931,585 31,900 1,617,000 1,365,260 137,287 833,290 1,293,232 900,000 936,177 261,220 181,895 883,414 3,773 4,474 1,100,000 924,426 1,447,743 1,657,000 1,123,583 972,991 1,472,651 1,669,894 -3,958 13,700 -3,958 20,000 34,000 305,500 5,717 15,460 41,346 181,399 23 24 25 26 4,999,311 4,985,849 3,492,155 3,337,718 38,311,834 38,311,834 27 23,618,498 23,610,961 28 2,009,742 2,009,742 483,500 344,061 29-18 TABLE 29-A SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 (Contrib. Funds) 18. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 22. Willapa River, Raymond, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 24. Chief Joseph Dam- Rufus Woods Lake, WA New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 6,745 -64 119,632 5,053 271,000 842,227 3,780,000 4,400,000 181,214 867,658 1,866,410 4,794,889 1,909,000 1,774,823 2,289,429 2,862,000 1,857,312 1,790,974 2,380,528 2,854,976 145,000 183,000 174,000 146,279 184,132 174,684 165,108 164,776 163,032 48,086 89,538,075 29 88,519,553 30 40,992,568 40,967,461 285,908 285,908 30,437,500 30,437,500 3,928 3,928 134,595 134,595 3,820,632 3,820,126 31 32 21,000 21,000 106,000 71,000 66,000 105,642 71,934 66,961 425 24,055 12,900 I1,000 5,592 42,585 42,514 4,534 82,311 76,786 52,500 38,227 5,366,568 5,011,487 4,553,193 6,522,770 5,277,760 4,587,411 4,744,550 6,767,724 246,000 -176,000 173,193 -108,174 -5,000 20,303 231 3,947,853 3,947,853 1,235,952 1,235,733 54,405 49,250 93,311 82,378 52,500 38,227 31,741,561 31.741,561 33 34 90,773,488 35 90,319,808 36 540,341,235 37 540,341,224 38 29-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project 25. Libby Dam- Lake Koocanusa, MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. Deepwater Slough, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Goldsborough Creek, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Porter Levee, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Puget Creek, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Thornton Creek, WA (Federal Funds) Funding Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost ew Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 12,716,493 16,576,485 12,647,268 15,907,903 20,548,412 233,696,818 39 17,164,718 228,838,830 40 12,592,890 12,285,641 297,630 297,630 543,726,140 543,726,140 41 8,623,021 6,926,169 8,917,402 8,562,756 6,943,323 8,800,690 8,072,488 105,481,641 42 7,196,483 104,298,777 43 1,458,252 1,458,252 165,000 845,000 120,738 740,930 263,000 75,641 _ 40,000 690,000 _ 12,205 484,511 215,000 220,000 171,310 238,311 _ 162,800 _ 115,992 24,000 6,972 30,000 81,000 8,509 90,417 664,000 598,381 175,250 237,475 295,000 471,023 373,000 1,234,000 1,216,076 557,000 514,126 -18,000 28,524 8,389 -9,000 373 9,000 4,650 68,000 112,000 -6,000 64,299 77,479 33,346 38,250 25,764 49,000 162,500 39,472 30,768 11,176 -40,500 83,546 1,011 -1,011 7,000 22,509 44 1,674,000 1,460,049 438,250 313,116 1,025,000 967,739 373,000 1,669,000 1,625,697 557,000 514,126 144,800 144,516 24,000 15,361 102,000 99,299 9,000 4,650 180,000 178,351 38,250 35,929 265,000 262,775 29-20 TABLE 29-A SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 106,700 - 106,700 33. Turning Basin #3 Seattle, WA Cost New Work Approp. Cost 35,445 160,000 40,000 836,200 122,067 67,664 678,468 1. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 3. Includes $480,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, appropriated and expended. 4. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 5. Includes $5,869 for previous project and $120,000 for Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters, appropriated and expended. 6. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L.98-8). 7. Includes $23,042,169 appropriated for all projects (current project is $18,160,287 including $3,530,000 PED), $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds. 8. Includes $22,939,536 expended for all projects (current project is $18,057,654 including $3,530,000 PED), $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds. 9. Includes $37,415 for previous project and $1,923,511 for Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters, appropriated and expended. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 10. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 11. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays Harbor in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 12. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 13. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 14. Previous project. 15. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 16. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous project. 17. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 18. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 19. Includes $3,197,512 appropriated for East Waterway. 20. Includes $3,197,511 expended for East Waterway. 21. Includes $2,262,975 appropriated for East Waterway. 22. Includes $2,038,749 expended for East Waterway. 23. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 24. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 25. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 26. Includes $6,597 expended for previous projects. 27. Includes $37,048,061 appropriated and expended for original project and $1,263,773 appropriated and expended for Dam Safety Assurance. 28. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 29. Includes $13,182,063 appropriated for original project, $87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $76,268,227 appropriated for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 30. Includes $13,182,063 expended for original project, $87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $75,249,705 expended for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 31. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 32. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 33. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 34. Includes $30,769,614 for original project and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 35. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($80,526,170), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,875,446), BPA/COE Merged, CAT 390 ($6,983,932) and BPA-4045 Large Capital Subagreements, CAT 300 ($1,213,164). 36. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($80,493,184), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,875,446), BPA/COE Merged, CAT 390 ($6,852,310) and BPA-4045 Large Capital Subagreements, CAT 300 ($924,092). 37. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $395,855,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 29-21 -9,555 673,700 809,069 25,890 1,709,900 1,677,268 5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 38. Includes $144,338,252 expended for original project, $395,854,989 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 39. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($196,805,943), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), BPA/COE Merged, CAT 390 ($27,466,431), and BPA- 4045 Large Capital Subagreements, CAT 300 ($8,649,883). 40. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($196,772,616), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), BPA/COE Merged, CAT 390 ($27,210,047), and BPA-4045 Large Capital Subagreements, CAT 300 ($4,081,606). 41. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated and expended for original project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 42. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($89,830,170), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), BPA/COE Merged, CAT 390 ($13,267,220), and BPA- 4045 Large Capital Subagreements, CAT 300 ($1,609,690). 43. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($89,815,640), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), BPA/COE Merged, CAT 390 ($13,176,771), and BPA-4045 Large Capital Subagreements, CAT 300 ($531,805). 44. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. 29-22 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Project and Work Authorized BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA June 25, 1910 Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. July 3, 1930 Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Aug. 26, 1937 Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Sep. 3, 1954 Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. July 14, 1960 Expansion of small-boat basin. as amended July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended 2. July 14, 1960 as amended Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. Channel 3,200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 18 feet deep in I&J Street Waterway. BLAIR WATERWAY, TACOMA, WA Deepen channel and turning basin to -51 feet mean lower low water. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA June 25, 1910 Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. July 3, 1930 Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. June 20, 1938 Abandon project for Snohomish River and redesignate as Everett Harbor and Snohomish River. Provide settling basin near 14th Street. Sep. 3, 1954 Construct spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. July 14, 1960 Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. 4. 5. July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 1 I, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel. in Text Documents 1. 29-23 TABLE 29-B See Date Section Authorizing H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb 10, 1976. S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 5, 1965. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 17, 1999 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1981. Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 78-534 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. Westhaven Cove small boat basin. Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA June 25, 1910 Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated Mar. 4, 1913 spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay, dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Aug. 8, 1917 Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. Sep. 22, 1922 Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. June 26, 1934 1 Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Aug. 30, 1935 2 Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Dec. 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation as amended facilities. July 24, 1956 Government Locks to be known as Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 as amended July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increase channel to 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen entrance to turning basin. 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of entrance and access channels and turning basin. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging, and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin. 3 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 29-24 H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc. 30, 84th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 7, 1979 P.L. 99-662. H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 78-534 P.L. 84-779 H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 13, 1981 Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. 6. 10. 11. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. Aug. 30, 1935 Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. Oct. 12, 1996 East Waterway channel deepening. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA July 13, 1892 Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike Aug. 30, 1935 13. construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Oct. 23, 1962 Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA July 27, 1916 Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 4 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. Willapa River and Harbor redesignated as Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River. TABLE 29-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 CEDAR RIVER, RENTON, WA June 30,1948 Dredging of lower river channel as amended and raising of levees and floodwalls along both river banks. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA May 17, 1950 Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Aug. 6, 1958 Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. LONG ROAD, CHEHALIS RIVER, WA June 30, 1948 Levee protection. as amended MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA June 22, 1936 Flood control dam on White River. Dec. 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of as amended recreation facilities. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA June 22, 1936 Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 sites; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. June 28, 1938 Maintenance of improvements. Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 1, 1998 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 85-592 Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 17, 2000 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 75-761 29-25 Documents H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., Ist Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., I st Sess. H. Doe. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 12. 14. 15. 17. 18. 20. - - -- -- ---- --- -- ---- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZIfNOEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA June 22, 1936 Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Dec. 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of as amended recreation facilities. WILLAPA RIVER, RAYMOND, WA July 24, 1946 Rebuild damaged levee section to protect a wastewater as amended treatment plant. May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA July 24, 1946 Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. June 30, 1948 Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. July 9, 1952 Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Dec. 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of as amended recreation facilities. Oct. 22, 1976 School facilities for education of dependents of as amended May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 construction personnel. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Nov. 24, 1999. S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 78-534. H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-239 5 P.L. 90-483 6 P.L. 91-282 7 P.L. 91-625 P.L. 91-611 29-26 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZiNO6LEGISLATION Act Project and Work Authorized Mar. 7, 1974 Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Mar. 7, 1974 Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Mar. 7, 1974 Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Mar. 7, 1974 Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Mar. 7, 1974 Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Oct. 22, 1976 Amends P.L. 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. Nov. 17, 1988 Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect Indian archeological sites exposed during course of operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. Nov. 17, 1986 as amended Oct. 12, 1996 28. 29. Nov. 17, 1986 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 as amended 30. 31. DEEPWATER SLOUGH, WA Environmental restoration. GOLDSBOROUGH CREEK, WA Aquatic ecosystem restoration. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Environmental restoration. PORTER LEVEE, WA Environmental restoration. Documents S.Doc. 29, 93d P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 Cong., Ist Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 100-676 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 24, 1999 Sec. 206, P.L. 104-303 Authorized by Chief of Engineers August 14, 2000 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 Authorized by Chief of Engineers October 22, 1999 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1999 PUGET CREEK, WA Environmental restoration. Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 9, 1998 SAMMAMISH RIVER WEIR RESTORATION, WA Modification of the grade control sill (weir) and the right bank of the river adjacent to the sill and upstream for 1,200 feet. Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 Authorized by Chief of Engineers 29-27 TABLE 29-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text 26. 27. j REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 1, 1998 32. THORNTON CREEK, WA Nov. 17, 1986 Restoration features include planting vegetation, Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 as amended creating a fish pond, water diversion, "softening" Authorized by Chief of Engineers over a bulkhead, and provide human access and viewing areas. Sep. 21, 1998 33. TURNING BASIN #3, SEATTLE, WA Nov. 17, 1986 Environmental restoration. Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662 as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 26, 1999 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, 2. Included in Public Works Administration program. Section 502. 3. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of 6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. James Island, is included in this modification. 7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil 4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. TABLE 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual And Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anacortes Harbor, WA Completed 1999 $222,345 6 1,207,484 7 Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA I Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)l Blaine Harbor, WA Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WAI Ediz Hook, WA Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Flathead River, MT Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA3 Hammersley Inlet, WA Hoquiam River, WA Kenmore Navigation Channel, WAI Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WAI Kingston Harbor, WA Kootenai River, ID and MT Lake Crockett, WA Mats Mats Bay, WAI Neah Bay, WAI Neah Bay, WA Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Port Angeles Harbor, WA4 Port Gamble Harbor, WA Port Orchard Bay, WAS Port Townsend, WA Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WAI Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Skagit River, WA Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WAl Tacoma Harbor, WA Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1966 1958 1923 1985 1999 1987 1901 1998 1950 1950 1998 1993 1967 1933 1999 1970 1997 1999 1913 1918 1960 1953 1928 1999 1985 1962 1950 1981 1992 1987 825,263 125,634 346,650 274,391 1,619,956 5,878,740 9,811 1,421,000 9,000 18,921 946,000 264,000 262,570 9,255 377,990 137,679 3,874,920 2,057,266 63,879 4,491 470,873 11,911 42,804 480,899 1,461,590 2,575,091 102,330 1,744,025 2,383,891 73,322 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 7,693 2,085,838 224,756 10,683 5,316 925,342 5,000 5,643 1,179,275 2,083,057 7,634 259 13,337 118,656 36,258 1,537,150 378,753 13 17 27 29-28 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WAI Completed TABLE 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED (Continued) 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 111, Public Law 90-483. 4. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 5. No maintenance required. 6. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds and $59,524 contributed 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. funds expended. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. Excludes $385,850 contributed funds expended. Excludes $229,501 contributed funds expended. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. Excludes $114,272 contributed funds expended. 1981 2,000,000 28 I NAVIGATION PROJECTS 16. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 17. Mitigation of shore damages study. 18. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 19. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 20. Excludes $528,188 contributed funds expended. 21. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 22. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 23. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 24. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 25. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 26. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds and $1,147,208 contributed funds expended. 27. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $222,500 contributed funds expended. 28. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. TABLE 29-D OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA Completed 1997 $925,500 1 Lummi Shore Road, WA Completed 1999 1,980,391 2 1. Excludes $391,126 contributed funds expended. 2. Excludes $924,195 contributed funds expended. 29-29 --- --~~- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WAI Completed 1957 $59,582 $10,000 Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Completed 1971 1,424 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT2 Completed 1990 180,950 49,759 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Completed 1964 17,836 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 156,000 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 57,000 Cedar River, King County, WA3 Completed 1953 3,229 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis Raw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA Completed 1998 8,301,833 5 1,538,784 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1994 178,800 39,818 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500 Clark Fork River, near Garrison, MT2 Completed 1993 80,611 16,973 Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Completed 1978 31,548 Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed 1971 28,357 Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Completed 1950 27,947 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,000 24,728 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452 Coffee Creek, WA3 Completed 1966 15,000 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,862 6 13,500 Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726 Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 Dungeness River, Area 5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,155 Dungeness 2,155 River, Area 8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 2,895 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WAI Completed 1964 52,040 7 Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,093 3,314 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WAI Completed 1991 1,455,023 119,449 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Completed 1955 26,265 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT1 Completed 1995 81,500 13,467 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1948 33,347 Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1964 13,438 Flathead River (North Fork), MT Completed 1999 79,105 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT 3 Completed 1950 2,320 Foster Creek, West Fork, WA 2 Completed 1958 19,513 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 29-30 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 TABLE 29-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 -- Contributed Project Funds Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Hoquiam River, WA2 Horseshoe Bend, WAI Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District # 1, ID2 La Conner, WA La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Lower Green River, King County, WAI Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA2 Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant)2 Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Naches River, Naches, WA2 Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA2 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Nooksack River, WA3 Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Nooksack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA2 Nooksack River, above Highway 12 Bridge, WA2 Okanogan River, WA2 Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Okanogan River, Omak, WAI Okanogan River, Oroville, WAI Pilchuck River, WA3 Pilchuck River, WA2 Pilchuck River, WA2 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Placer Creek, ID Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Puyallup River, WA Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Quillayute River. Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Rock Creek Road, MT2 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1964 1983 1977 1977 1977 1997 1962 1950 1965 1996 1979 1993 1995 1974 1974 1974 1976 1949 1951 1951 1972 1965 1977 1982 1991 1972 1948 1960 1952 1948 1985 1950 1986 1960 1974 1949 1953 1981 1982 1948 1985 1971 1980 1971 1986 1964 1937 1977 1981 1972 1981 1961 1974 1973 1980 29-31 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1980 1980 1956 1961 37,359 143,000 194,000 22,082 11,916 21,807 IL- --- Jl Construction -- $41,622 173,000 21,083 59,812 52,600 204,989 24,000 42,325 14,885 955,000 40,525 912,000 482,000 15,700 11,200 13,450 19,810 31,783 33,300 11,726 11,836 50,000 17,608 59,000 253,995 24,792 37,636 26,790 19,345 24,006 77,300 6,075 79,000 10,807 10,100 52,100 7,987 2,231,030 1,787,630 25,401 81,000 10,713 54,000 30,973 5,865,000 11,291 50,000 86,160 125,000 39,300 208,000 15,928 49,657 31,565 50,000 $9,146 9 246,889 120,518 134,772 6,786 11,726 78,433 6,075 4,943 10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Rye Creek, MT2 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID St. Regis River, MT3 St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT3 Sammamish River, WA Project Sauk River, WA2 Sauk River, Skagit County, WA2 Shelton Creek, WAI Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1) Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1) Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WAI Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Stillwater River, MT2 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Tahola, WA2 Upper Puyallup River, WA4 Wynoochee Lake, WA Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River near Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Yakima River, Yakima WA2 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1974 1989 1979 1949 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1981 1969 1970 1977 1961 1963 1989 1970 1964 1973 1977 1970 1979 1938 1994 1976 1969 1972 1948 1949 1947 1977 1983 Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Construction 20,860 119,600 872,021 50,000 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 50,000 222,500 44,227 60,900 15,565 16,437 11,433 122,138 271,713 50,000 17,457 34,513 8,442 223,893 71,495 23,494,445 111,072 50,000 50,000 381,961 8,047 48,272 36,768 125,500 13 14 15 16 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended. 4. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 5. Includes $2,212,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, appropriated and expended. 6. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 7. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 8. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98- 8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. 9. Includes $183,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, appropriated and expended. 10. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 11. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Administration which is not available. 12. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 13. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 14. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $17,070,670 for project maintenance and $66,678 for Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters, appropriated and expended. 15. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Planning funds expended. 16. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). 29-32 TABLE 29-E (Continued) Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1973 1942 1942 1951 1967 22,819 357,698 7,234 2,983 2,582,536 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 11 12 696,923 Contributed Funds 32,778 24,488 14,307 1,960 79,311 46,182 13,704 21,311 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE POWER PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 $350,000 1 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. TABLE 29-G OTHER AUTHORIZED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds Sammamish River Restoration, Washington I Completed 1995 326,900 64,333 1. Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended. TABLE 29-H OTHER PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report Federal See Annual Funds Project Status Report For Expended Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Under Const. 1989 $1,310,000 1 2 East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Deferred 1988 663,000 Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Under Const. 1989 5,670,000 3 Yakima River at Union Gap, WA Deferred 1988 502,000 1. Includes $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 3. $3,530,000 of which is included in construction costs. 101(c). 2. $480,000 of which is included in construction costs. TABLE 29-I OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds Aquatic Plant Control Completed 1997 $6,023,906 Green River, King County, WA Completed 1985 498,320 Oak Harbor, WA Completed 1983 519,000 29-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 29-J DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WAI 1968 1968 $25,000 14 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA2 1958 1964 9,000 14 Entiat River, WA3 1958 1986 - Methow River, WA3 1958 1986 Okanogan River, WA3 1958 1986 1,100 14 St. Regis River, MT4 1958 1978 1,400 14 Wenatchee River, WA4 1958 1978 Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA3 1980 1986 44,300 14, 15 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68) 6 1973 1990 52,000 14 Flathead River at Kalispell, MT7 1981 1995 300,000 14 - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) (Unconstructed Portion) 6,8 1962 1990 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 6,9 1933 1990 35,834 $35,834 Hammersley Inlet, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)4,10 1950 1978 Hoquiam, Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA 5 1948 1952 83,631 14 Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45) 6 1973 1990 21,606 14,16 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (RH 35) 4 1960 1977 Port Gamble Harbor, WA) (RH 35)4 1953 1977 Quillayute River, WA(RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)3,11 1986 1986 Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 3,12 1986 1986 Skagit River, WA (RH 10) (Unconstructed Portion) 4,13 1950 1978 Skagit River, WA (RH19) 4 1950 1978 Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass) 6 1968 1990 54,468 14 Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements)7 1982 1995 1,934,792 Spokane River, Spokane, WA3 1939 1986 2,944 14 Stillaguamish River, WA (RH 45)3 1946 1986 4,234 17 Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA 6 1978 1990 544,331 14 Willapa River at Raymond, WA7 1982 1995 508,130 14, 18 1 h toI I. AutLorLlty tor project e;xpireUU Utotr L, 1 a8. 2. Authority for project expired July 1964. 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L. 93-251 dated March 7, 1974. 5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001 (b) (1), P.L. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 7. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001 (b) (2), P.L. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 8. 2200 linear feet of revetment at Point Chehalis. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. Deepening shoal area near Cannery Point from 10 to 13 feet. Groin feature of the project. Settling basin at upper end of existing Duwamish Waterway, about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge. 5500-foot extension of training dike. Preconstruction planning only. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. Economic restudy only. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967-1972. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 6) Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth Clear width of chamber Feet 1 1 80 28 29-34 TABLE 29-K Cannonr v "" Il SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Maximum available length Lift Depth on upper miter sill Depth on intermediate miter sill Depth on lower miter sill Character of foundation TABLE 29-K LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 6) (Continued) Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway gated spillway Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 I. Low water in upper pool. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. emergency gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. TABLE 29-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (2000) Cataldo, ID $16,380 Lincoln County, MT 9,221 1 Long Road, F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA 0 2 Northbend, WA 9,358 Section 205 Coordination 14,926 Snoqualmie River, WA 82,624 3 Stillaguamish River Valley, Stanwood, WA 102,499 St. Maries, ID 52,061 TOTAL $287,069 1. Terminated 3. Excludes $1,273 contributed funds expended. 2. Construction initiated in FY 2000. TABLE 29-M ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (2000) Bear Creek Restoration, Washington $82,338 2 Goldsborough Creek, WA 0 1 3 Hanson Anadromous Fish and Wildlife, WA 31,923 2 Initia! Appraisals, General 14,685 2 Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 0 1 2 Loomis Lake Restoration, WA 8,974 3 Metzler/O'Grady Side Channels, WA 222 2 Preliminary Restoration Plans 44,886 3 Section 206 Coordination 18,446 3 Section 1135 Coordination 16,328 2 Union Slough, WA 80,535 2 Wynoochee Anadromous Fish, WA 8,528 2 TOTAL $306,865 1. Construction initiated in FY 2000. 3. Section 206, Public Law 104-303. 2. Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended. 29-35 Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet 760 26 33 '/2 29 29 Clay 123 26 16 16 Clay WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT* This U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Walla Walla District (District), consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary Reservoir (Lake Wallula) (river mile 345.4) and Umatilla Bridge (river mile 290.5) below McNary Lock and Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (river mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. The primary tributary drainage area is the Snake River that includes more than 107,000 square miles in six states: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and small portions of Nevada and Utah. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ................................ 30-2 2. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 30-2 3. Jackson Hole, WY ........ ........... a.......... 30-2 4. Lucky Peak Lake, ID............................. 30-3 5. Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA............. 30-3 6. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .............................. 30-4 Multipurpose Projects, Including Power 7. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (Walla Walla Projects), OR, WA, and ID........................... 30-4 8. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID..............30-5 9. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Lake Sacajawea, WA .............................. 30-6 10. Little Goose Lock and Dam, Lake Bryan, WA ................................... 30-7 11. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Lower Granite Lake, WA ........................ 30-7 12. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West, WA...................... 30-8 13. Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR, and ID ......................................... 30-9 14. McNary Lock and Dam, Lake Wallula, OR and WA ............................30-9 15. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, andID.................................. 30-10 16. Miscellaneous Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 30-10 General Investigations 17. Surveys................... ............... 30-11 18. Collection and Study of Basic Data........ 30-12 19.Preconstruction, Engineering, and Design .................................... 30-12 Tables Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement... 30-13 Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 30-16 Table 30-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects........................... 30-20 Table 30-D Not Applicable Table 30-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 30-21 Table 30-F Other Authorized Multipurpose Projects, Including Power........ 30-22 Table 30-G Deauthorized Projects............30-22 Table 30-H Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects.........30-23 Table 30-I Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects..........30-23 Table 30-J Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant, and Impoundment...30-24 Table 30-K Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID ......................... 30-29 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 Flood Control 1. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along the Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for the Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Congress, 2nd Session, and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. From that authorization, an amount (not to exceed $15 million) was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout the Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, should be required (see tables 30-B and H, for projects in the District). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year (FY). No projects were deauthorized. 2. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine the extent of compliance and to advise local interests, as necessary, of measures required to correct deficiencies (see table 30-I for inspections made during the FY). The FY costs were $19,647. Total costs in September 30, 2000, were $2,944,387. 3. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. This project is located on the banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, WY. Existing project. On the Snake River, approximately 23.5 miles of Federally-constructed levees consist of the following: (1) On the right bank: a series of levees, off-set levees, and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a total of 13.5 miles; (2) On the left bank: a series of Federally-constructed levees and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection, extending from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 5 miles upstream. It resumes 1.5 miles immediately upstream of the same bridge and continues to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a total of 10 miles. In addition, a series of Federal and non-Federal constructed levees, with a total length of approximately 5 miles, most having some or full riprap protection, are interspersed along both banks of the Snake River from Highway 26 Bridge to 4 miles downstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge. On the Gros Ventre River, approximately 2 miles of riprap protected levees on the left bank from 1.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge and extending to 0.5 miles east of the same bridge. On the right bank, a series of levees extending from 0.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge to approximately 0.3 miles east of the same bridge. The Project is authorized by Public Law (PL) 81-516, Flood Control Act of 1950, for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetments along the Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson, WY. The PL 104-303 modified the original PL 81-516 to ensure the operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in any 1 year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 30-2 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Since 1978, $60,622,000 (adjusted to October 2000 price index) in potential flood damaged habr been prevented by the levees. Operations during FY. Teton County, under their Local Cooperative Agreement, worked with the Corps performing levee maintenance. The FY costs were $1,133,473. 4. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. This project is located on the Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of the city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolled earthfill dam about 250 feet above the streambed and 1,700 feet long at the crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. The project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation (for details, see page 2,000 of the 1962 Annual Report). Construction of the existing project was initiated in November 1949 and completed in June 1961. Since 1961, $472,293,000 (adjusted to October 2000 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During a detailed study of outlet capacity and potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In FY 78, an Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980, and modified on October 9, 1980, and in 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on-line for all units was August 18, 1988. A Federally-authorized second outlet was deauthorized in FY 90. Recreation facilities at Lucky Peak Lake consist of 20 picnic/day-use areas, 4 boat launch ramps, and 3 swimming areas. The FY visitation to Lucky Peak Lake was 751,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance, which included the dam structures and recreation areas, continued. The FY costs were $1,099,314. 5. MILL CREEK, BENNINGTON LAKE, WA Location. This project is located in and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an offstream earthfill storage dam, about 125 feet above the streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and diversion structures. The Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through the city of Walla Walla was completed in 1966 (for details, see page 2,005 of the 1962 Annual Report). Since 1942, $46,655,000 (adjusted to October 2000 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Rehabilitation of the existing project was initiated in FY 78 and completed in FY 79. The plan of rehabilitation included action to correct the seepage and internal erosion that has occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir. A cutoff wall was constructed but did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for dam failure. Mill Creek/Bennington Lake offers visitors three day-use/picnic areas and one boat launch ramp. 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 Visitation to Mill Creek/Bennington Lake for the FY was 174,500. Local cooperation. Fully complied with (for details, see page 2,006 of the 1962 Annual Report). Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. Initiated right abutment test grouting contract. The FY costs were $866,919. 6. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation for Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs, ID; and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs, OR. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, WY, Arrowrock Reservoir and Lake Lowell, ID, were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control regulation was accomplished under informal agreements for the Owyhee Reservoir, OR; and American Falls, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, ID. Brownlee and Oxbow Reservoirs, OR, and Hells Canyon Reservoir, OR and ID, provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. The FY costs were $332,000. Multipurpose Projects, Including Power 7. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (WALLA WALLA PROJECTS), OR, WA, AND ID Location. This project is located at Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams on the lower Snake River in the State of Washington and McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River in the States of Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the Columbia and lower Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to downstream migrating juvenile salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide these juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile fish mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed, and the President signed, the FY 89 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (PL 100-371), which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River fish mitigation projects. Completion of bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and lower Snake River dams. The mitigation study project was added to the President's FY 91 budget. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: (1) Ice Harbor Lock and Danrm: screens, new gantry crane, collection bypass facility, intake gate raise, spillway deflectors, surface bypass, and fish ladder temperature control; (2) Lower Monumental Lock and Dam: hold/load and collection bypass facility, screens, passive integrated transponder tag (PIT-Tag) facility, barge load facility modifications, barges, gate raise modifications, gantry crane, fish ladder temperature control, and surface bypass; (3) Little Goose Lock and Dam: screens, gantry crane modification, collection bypass facility, outfall pipe, fish ladder temperature control, fallout fences, gate raise, deck screen modifications, PITTag facility, and surface bypass; (4) Lower Granite Lock and Dam: juvenile fish facility, gantry crane, gate raise, outfall pipe, fish barges, screens, additional moorage facility, fish slot closures, juvenile fish facility improvements, barge exit modifications, deck screen modifications, fish ladder temperature control, surface bypass, PIT-Tag facility, and fallout fences; and (5) McNary Lock and Dantm: gantry crane, screens, hold/load facility, gate raise modifications, tilted weirs fish ladder, maintenance facility, fish ladder exits, hold/load facility, adult/juvenile collection channel stoplogs, juvenile fish facility, surface bypass, and gantry crane modifications. 30-4 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT In response to the 1995 Biological Opinion issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service, the District is conducting a feasibility study (Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study) to evaluate salmon migration problems on the lower Snake River. The objective of the study is to improve salmon migration conditions through the four Corps-operated dams and reservoirs on the lower Snake River. The study focuses on how these dams can be changed to improve survival and recovery prospects for Snake River salmon stocks under the Endangered Species Act The total estimated cost of the study is $25.5 million. Expenditures to date are $24.8 million. The District is currently managing a surface bypass and collection technology development effort that focuses on improving juvenile fish passage for endangered and threatened salmon migration past all Corps hydroelectric projects on the Columbia and lower Snake Rivers. It is an aggressive, nontraditional approach to prototype development that involves fast-track design, construction, testing, and evaluation. The fully-funded Federal project cost is estimated at $682,700,000 for Walla Walla projects. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. At Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, work was completed on phase II of the spillway deflector contract and on the completion contract. A contract was awarded for McNary Lock and Dam juvenile fish collection channel bulkheads. At Little Goose Lock and Dam, a contract was awarded for the trash boom, and a mechanical and biological test was completed on the new extendedlength submersible bar screens (ESBS) perforated plate design. At Little Goose and Lower Granite Locks and Dams, handrail work was completed, and fishway orifice backflush automation was completed at Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Several Columbia River fish mitigation studies continued, including the Turbine Model Study at McNary Lock and Dam, and the System Gas Abatement Study. In addition, field studies and physical modeling work were initiated on several projects related to design of additional or modified flow deflectors. For the fourth consecutive year, a prototype surface collection test was conducted at Lower Granite Lock and Dam. The technical analysis continued for the Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study. The public involvement aspects of the study were expanded to meet the intense regional interest. This involvement included a number of public information meetings, focus meetings, workshops, newsletters, newspaper inserts, traveling displays, and pamphlets. Coordination efforts continued with a number of established regional recovery groups, as well as tribal consultation efforts. Work continued in many other areas, including cultural resources, National Environmental Policy Act, Coordination Act Report, wildlife, and water quality. The FY costs were $30,656,582. Total project costs are $339,370,105. 8. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. The dam is on the North Fork of the Clearwater River, 1.9 miles above its junction with the Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, public parks, and appurtenant facilities. The Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between the elevations of 1,600 and 1,445 mean sea level (msl). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,468,000 acre-feet (2 million acre-feet of which are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation). In addition, the reservoir, extending 59 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provided cost-effective transportation for moving marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. The dam structure is about 3,287 feet long and about 717 feet above the streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. The powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatts (kW) and one 220,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 400,000 kW. Provisions had been made for three additional 220,000 kW generating units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kW. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kW fourth generating unit was completed in FY 78. However, environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 opposition. Unit 4 is undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized FY 90, and Unit 4 was deauthorized in FY 95. Principal project data are set forth in table 30-J4. Construction of the project began in July 1966. It was placed in operation in 1972 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $2,836,000 (adjusted to October 2000 price index) in potential flood damages. Power generation through September 2000 was 46.54 billion kW hours. At Dworshak Reservoir, recreation facilities consist of 12 day-use/picnic areas, 6 camp areas, 6 boats launches, and 2 swim areas. Total visitation to Dworshak Reservoir for the FY was 147,200. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: Management of wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Completed paving contract at recreation areas. During the FY, 1.99 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. The FY costs were $9,535,939. Brood Year (BY) 1999 Steelbhead: Approximately 2.15 million BY 1999 steelhead smolts were released from Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) in April 1999. The fish averaged 201 millimeters (mm) in total length, just over the target of 200 mm. A total of 370,919 pounds of steelhead were released in 2000, compared with 318,000 pounds in 1999 and 353,000 pounds in 1998. The BY 2000 Steelbhead: A total of 2,882 adult steelhead returned to DNFH in the fall of 1999 and spring of 2000 compared with 5,419 the previous BY. A total of 2.7 million eggs went into DNFH's production program. The DNFH provided 957,000 eyed eggs to Clearwater Hatchery, 1.66 million green eggs to Magic Valley Hatchery, and 20,000 for school projects. The BY 1998 Chinook Salmon: The DNFH released 1,017,873 BY 1998 spring chinook salmon, weighing 42,395 pounds, as part of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan. This was just under the compensation plan goal of 1,050,000 smolts. The BY 1999 Chinook Salmon: There were 957 spring chinook salmon that returned to DNFH and Kooskia National Fish Hatchery (NFH) in 1999. Of this number, 752 were jacks, which left 215 adults for spawning. These fish produced 338,000 eyed eggs. Approximately 295,000 fingerlings were on station at the end of FY 2000. The BY 2000 Chinook Salmon: Adult returns totaled 3,202 fish to DNFH in 2000. Another 1,851 adults returned to Kooskia NFH. A total of 1.78 million eyed eggs are being reared from these adult returns. 9. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. This dam is located on the Snake River, 9.7 miles above the river mouth at the head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, recreation areas, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 440 and 435 msl. Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. The dam structure is about 2,822 feet long and about 130 feet above the streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. The Powerhouse has three 90,000 kW units and three 111,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kW. The spillway dam is 590 feet long, and the overflow crest at elevation 391 msl is surmounted by 10 tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 52.9 feet high, that provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). The deck is at elevation 453 msl and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a 16-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 41.6 miles long is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in table 30-J. Construction of the original project began in December 1955. It was placed in operation in 1961 and completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and 30-6 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT completed in 1981. Power generation through September 2000 was 83.13 billion kW hours. Recreation areas on Lake Sacajawea include 11 picnic/day-use sites, 4 camping areas, 7 areas with boat launching, and 4 swimming areas. Total visitation on Lake Sacajawea for the FY was 459,700. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: During the FY, 2.21 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 4,559,900 tons during calendar year 1999. The FY costs were $9,123,794. 10. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. The dam is 70.3 miles above the mouth of the Snake River and at the head of Lake Herbert G. West (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 638 and 633 msl. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 2,655 feet long and about 165 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores and a fish channel through the spillway, which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kW. The spillway dam is 512 feet long, and the overflow crest at elevation 581 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, that provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 668 feet and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 37.2 miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and the Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in table 30-J. Construction of the original project began in 1963. It was placed in operation in 1970 and completed in 1976. Construction of additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 2000 was 76.39 billion kW hours. Lake Bryan provides seven day-use sites, five campgrounds, five boat launching areas, and two swimming areas. Total FY visitation was 197,800 for Lake Bryan. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: During the FY, 3.21 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,109,100 tons during calendar year 1999. The FY costs were $6,476,682. 11. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, LOWER GRANITE LAKE, WA Location. This dam is at river mile 107.5 on the Snake River at the head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and includes about 8 miles of slack water levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. The project provides for slack water navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 738 and 733 msl in Lewiston, ID, and Clarkston, WA. The Lower Granite Lake extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slack water to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. The dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway that connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kW. The spillway dam is 512 feet long, and the overflow crest 30-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 at elevation 681 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. The navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 674 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 39.3 miles long is provided from the dam to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in table 30-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965. It was placed in operation in 1975 and completed in 1984. Construction of additional generating units was started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 2000 was 67.57 billion kW hours. Approximately $16,746,000 (adjusted to October 2000 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented since the levees became functional. Lower Granite Lake offers visitors 16 dayuse/ picnic sites, 6 sites with camping, 12 boat launch ramps, and 4 swimming areas. Total recreation visitation to Lower Granite Lake for the FY was 1,061,700. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: During the FY, 3.14 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 2,264,100 tons during calendar year 1999. The FY costs were $9,121,087. Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. As the first collector dam on the Snake River, Lower Granite Lock and Dam is a primary component of the Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. Transport began in the late 1960's as a research program on how to bypass juvenile salmon and steelhead around dams and reservoirs of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became an operational program in 1981 with collection and transport from Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary Locks and Dams. Transport was expanded in 1993 to include Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Development and improvement of collection and bypass systems continues with a new collection system completed at McNary Lock and Dam in 1994, a new bypass system completed at Ice Harbor Lock and Dam in 1996, and ESBS's installed at Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary Locks and Dams in 1996 and 1997. The 2000 juvenile fish transport season was marked by below average flows after four either average or very high flow years. Juvenile fish collection at Lower Granite Lock and Dam was 8,300,546 compared with 5,879,114 in 1999 and 6,977,250 in 1998. A total of 342,507 fish were bypassed back to the river in 2000 and 7,650,648 were transported. At Little Goose Lock and Dam, a total of 2,818,520 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected in 2000 compared to 7,004,421 in 1999. No fish were bypassed back to the river in 2000 compared to 182,295 in 1998. The larger number of fish bypassed in 1998 was due to collection numbers exceeding barging capacity on 2 days in late May. A total of 2,809,463 juvenile fish were transported from Little Goose Lock and Dam in 2000. At Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, 1,587,203 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected compared to 4,068,558 in 1999. A total of 47,171 fish were bypassed from Lower Monumental Lock and Dam in 2000 compared to 407,965 in 1999. At McNary Lock and Dam, all fish collected were bypassed until late June in keeping with fishery agency requirements. A total of 11,045,785 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected in 2000 compared to 7,841,978 in 1999. Approximately 2,400,354 of the fish collected were bypassed back to the river to meet fishery agency requirements. A grand total of 23,752,054 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected at all projects in 2000 compared to 24,794,071 in 1999. A total of 20,880,896 fish (88 percent of those collected) were transported in 2000. Of the fish transported, 19,983,988 were transported by barge (96 percent) and 896,908 were trucked (4 percent). 12. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Location. This dam is on the Snake River at the head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above the river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 540 and 537 msl. Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water 30-8 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam structure is about 3,791 feet long and about 135 feet above the streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kW. The spillway dam is 572 feet long, and the overflow crest at elevation 483 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, that provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. The Deck is at elevation 553 msl and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 666 feet and a 15-foot minimum depth of the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 28.1 miles long is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in table 30-J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961. It was placed in operation in 1969 and completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 2000 was 90.68 billion kW hours. Lake West offers seven day-use areas, five areas offering camping, five boat launch areas, and one designated swimming beach. Total visitation on Lake West for the FY was 151,576. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: During the FY, 3.54 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 7,109,500 tons during calendar year 1999. The FY costs were $7,775,230. 13. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID Location. This project is at various locations within the Columbia and Snake River drainages in the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas, and purchase of off-site project lands for fishing and hunting access. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multipurpose dams and reservoirs on the lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams). The real estate design memorandum and feature design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The DNFH Expansion: Irrigon, Hagerman, Lyons Ferry, Lookingglass, McCall, Sawtooth, Magic Valley, Tucannon, Wallowa, and Clearwater Hatcheries (including their respective satellite facilities) are all in operation. Transfer actions have been completed except for Irrigon, Clearwater, and Captain John Rapids Acclimation Facilities. Transfer for these remaining facilities is scheduled to be complete by the end of FY 00. Fencing is complete at all wildlife development areas. Off-project land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Habitat development continues at many of these sites. Development of fall chinook salmon acclimation facilities and Lookingglass Hatchery water treatment has progressed, in accordance with Senate Conference Report (103-672, page 7). The compensation plan is scheduled for completion in FY 02. Estimated Federal cost for the project is $232,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Different alternatives for water treatment at Lookingglass Hatchery have been coordinated with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife, and Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. An amendment to the design memorandumn will be completed based on the recommended alternative. 14. McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. This dam is on the Columbia River, 292 miles above the mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above the mouth of the Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. The project provides for slack water navigation, hydroelectric power generation, 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 340 and 335 msl. Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 7,365 feet long and about 183 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. The powerhouse has fourteen 70,000 kW generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kW. The spillway dam is 1,310 feet long, and the overflow crest is at elevation 291 msl and is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2.2 million cfs. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 683 feet and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel (250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 32 miles long) is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in table 30-J. Construction began in May 1947. It was placed in operation in 1953 and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 2000 was 289.81 billion kW hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Operation and Maintenance: During the FY, 6.61 billion kW hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 8,461,600 tons during calendar year 1999. The FY costs were $16,002,925. Recreation areas on Lake Wallula include 19 sites offering day-use or picnicking, 5 campgrounds, 14 boat launching ramps, and 9 swimming areas. The Pacific Salmon Visitor Information Center at McNary Lock and Dam, staffed by park rangers, provides a regional overview of Corps efforts in salmon recovery issues. Total visitation on Lake Wallula for the FY was 4,237,800. 15. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. This project is on the Snake River, downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, river mile 230. The Snake River, which is the largest tributary of the Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western Wyoming, flows generally in a westerly direction for about 1,000 miles, and empties into the Columbia River, near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams, as necessary, for power, incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack water navigation and irrigation between the mouth of the Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of the existing project. Improvements included in existing projects are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam, Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on tables 30-A and K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams are in full operation (see individual reports for details). For further details, see the following Annual Reports: page 2,246 for 1903; page 1,986 for 1906; page 1,991 for 1915; and page 1,981 for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On the Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing, there are 18 privately-owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to the public. The facilities serve slack water navigation to river mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack water reaches the Lewiston, ID, and Clarkston, WA, area since the lake behind Lower Granite Lock and Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during FY. See individual reports for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On the Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. No costs were incurred this FY. 30-10 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT 16. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, PL 858, 80th Congress, as amended: The FY costs were $203,750 with five continuing flood control activities: (1) Section 205 coordination ($16,808); (2) Negro Creek, Sprague, WA ($29,543); (3) Lawyers Creek, Kamiah, ID ($10,971); (4) Coppei Creek, WA ($84,953); (5) Mill Creek, WA ($43,290). One new flood control activity: Weiser River, ID ($18,184). Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (PL 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation): There were no Federal costs this FY. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, PL 526, 79th Congress): The FY costs were $46,702 for continuation of four feasibility studies: (1) Section 14 Coordination ($7,385); (2) Big Wood River, Deer Creek, Bridge, ID ($31,099); (3) Willow Creek, Whitman County, WA ($6,177); and (4) Payette River, Payette, ID ($2,041). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, PL 780, 83rd Congress): The FY costs were $1,973 for Section 208 Coordination. Project modification for the improvement of the environment (Section 1135(b), PL 99-662, as amended): The FY costs were $1,732,163 for continuation of three studies, and initial appraisal and coordination fuinds including: (1) Initial Appraisals, General ($15,911); (2) Coordination Account ($3,150); (3) Walla Walla River, OR and WA ($1,492,922); (4) Grande Ronde River, OR ($117,556); and(5) Milton- Freewater, OR ($102,624). General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control, WY. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of Federal and non-Federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY. A draft reconnaissance study with the potential for improving the system with levee raises, extensions, or relocations was completed in FY 90. The final reconnaissance study was combined with the Jackson Hole Restoration Study. The Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control Reconnaissance Study was initiated to restore fish and wildlife habitat in the 500-year floodplain of the leveed reach of the Snake and Gros Ventre Rivers at Jackson, WY. The study evaluated losses resulting from levee construction over the past 30 years and determined restoration measures for these losses. The report was approved in FY 94. A 4-year feasibility study was initiated in FY 96. The feasibility studywas completed in July 2000. Lower Boise River and Tributaries, ID. A reconnaissance study was re-initiated for the lower Boise River and tributaries in June 1994. An interim reconnaissance report was completed in May 1995. The interium report included economically feasible alternatives for flood control and environmental restoration. Completion of the study is scheduled for March 2001 ($13,913). Walla Walla River Watershed Study, OR, and WA. A reconnaissance study was initiated on August 29, 1996. The study objectives are riparian and wetland restoration, fish and wildlife restoration and enhancement, flood damage reduction, water quality improvements, water supply, erosion control, low flow augmentation, and recreation ($24,948). Little Wood River Gooding, ID. A reconnaissance study was initiated and completed for the Little Wood River in FY 00. The study determined that there is a Federal interest in restoring and replacing the Lava Rock Little Wood River Containment System. A feasibility study will be initiated in April 2001. Alternatives will be studied to provide flood protection to the city of Gooding, ID ($66,834). The FY costs for surveys were $557,607, including Special Studies: Jackson Hole Restoration, ($188,803); Walla Walla River Watershed, $24,949); and Tri-Cities Area Rivershore Enhancement ($6,780). Miscellaneous Activities [Special 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 Investigations, FERC Licensing Activities, North American Waterfowl Management Plan, Inteijgency Water Resource Development ($109",903)]; Coordination with other Federal Agencies ($19,231); and Planning Assistance to States ($127,194). In addition, $67,621 contributed funds were expanded for the Jackson Hole Restoration. Floodplain management service ($128,029). 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the FY, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies; to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington; to various cities and counties in those states; and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during the FY was $156,842, which included: Flood Plain Management Services ($19,985); Technical Services ($39,533); Quick Responses ($4,959); and Special Studies ($92,365). 19. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING, AND DESIGN No preconstruction, engineering, and design studies were conducted during the FY. 30-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total to Section Project Funding FY 97 (S) FY 98 () FY 99 (S) FY 00 ($) Sep 30, 2000 In Text ($) 3. Jackson Hole, WY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed funds) Maint. Contrib. Cost 4. Lucky Peak Lake, ID New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 5. Mill Creek, WA Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost 7. Columbia River Fish New Work Mitigation Approp. Program, OR, WA, Cost and ID 8. Dworshak Dam and New Work Reservoir, ID Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Ice Harbor Lock and New Work Dam, WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Little Goose Lock and New Work Dam, WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost i1. Lower Granite Lock New Work and Dam, WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 12. Lower Monumental New Work Lock and Dam, Approp. WA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,047,000 851,718 47,822 806,417 846,762 671,761 864,762 48,182 48,182 943,300 907,880 1,140,500 852,890 818,871 1,281,659 - - 2,525,070 - - 2,525,069 827,918 1,140,507 7,663,686' 842,552 1,133,473 8,381,567' 48,906 - 378,798 48,906 - 412,909 - - 19,652,0812 - - 19,648,9812 1,039,123 1,419,675 24,891,349' 1,076,698 1,099,314 24,560,8383 - - 2,258,4954 - - 2,258,4954 1,613,387 1,546,048 836,06 866,91 42,149,000 37,281,000 34,851,000 25,696,99 39,338,812 39,581,675 28,949,699 30,656,58 - - - 13,877,500 8,036,175 9,652,318 9,524,65 11,009,351 11,076,208 9,752,198 9,535,93 7,844,600 7,045,100 9,419,807 9,077,28 8,233,742 7,064,312 9,452,036 9,123,79 4,275,800 4,232,800 4,468,078 4,190,318 6,230,953 6,307,45 6,199,714 6,476,68 8,960,400 9,365,300 10,052,838 9,416,29 8,990,729 9,219,308 10,294,807 9,121,08 - - -. 4,791,900 5,048,600 6,250,690 7,831,7C 5,165,048 5,039,295 6,157,881 7,775,23 4 17,962,781 9 17,898,949 - 17,714,102 - 17,714,102 9 341,164,999' 2 339,370,1059 - 327,482,1965 - 327,482,1975 9 160,154,6826 9 160,033,7246 - 168,028,7577 - 168,029,756' 5 161,487,197a 4 161,431,8908 - 233,361,0219 - 233,361,0109 3 111,624,564'0 12 111,572,0100 - 374,836,315" - 374,836,315" )7 156,967,30312 7 156,557,12012 - 20,000 - 20,000 - 238,612,732" - 237,222,733 ' )5 115, 17,90414 30 114,890,361" 30-13 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT TABLE 30-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 97 () FY 98 (S) FY 99 (S) FY 00 (s) Sep 30, 2000 13. Lower Snake Fish New Work and Wildlife Approp. 4,238,000 2,907,000 1,304,000 1,230,032 229,959,273 Compensation, Cost 4,162,680 2,653,234 1,620,153 1,061,330 229,397,317 ID, OR, and WA New Work (Contributed Funds) Contrib. - - - 223,965 Cost - 223,965 14. McNary Lock and New Work Damr, Lake Approp. - 326,293,705's Wallula, OR, and Cost - 360,103,408' 5 WA Maint. Approp 11,958,900 12,627,724 14,193,157 15,675,724 286,125,50916 Cost 11,990,155 11,696,358 14,908,297 16,002,925 285,988,61516 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. - - - - 43,707 Cost - - - - 43,707 15. Snake River New Work Downstream Approp. 11,266,000 5,932,000 8,491,000 7,331,000 1,136,239,589' from Johnson Bar Cost 12,057,266 6,373,000 6,555,000 8,445,000 Landing, OR, 1,135,371,587' WA, and ID Maint. Approp. 25,872,702 25,691,800 31,954,288 32,632,740 545,789,471" Cost 26,857,597 25,513,233 32,104,438 74,163,551 586,706,558" From the county, $39,000 of the cost-sharing funds were received in FY 90, but were not expended until FY 91. 2 Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 5 Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in FYs 69 through 72 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 6 Includes $20,137,847 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 72 for hatchery operations. The FY's 72 through 78, funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $48,182 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92, special recreation use fees included with O&M. Includes $1,310,750 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7 Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $789,000 appropriated and $788,999 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. Includes $48,919 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92, special recreation fees included with O&M. Includes $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $178,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. 9 Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 appropriated and $12,006,000 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 'o Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $31,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. " Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $10,645,966 appropriated and $7,056,001 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 12 Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $32,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. 13 Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,239,000 appropriated and $2,239,000 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. '4 Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $36,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. 's Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3,778,000 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 16 Includes $28,851 appropriated and expended under special recreation use fees and $1,035,860 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. After FY 92, Special Recreation Use Fees included with O&M. Excludes $505,500 appropriated and $301,258 expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. 7 Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 30-14 WALLA WALLA, WA. DISTRICT Is Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $401,019 appropriated and $390,527 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 19 This does not include the appropriations and cost from the mitigation analysis under the Columbia River Fish Program, which will be allocated at the conclusion of the analysis. 30-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date In Text Authorizing Project and Work Authorized Documents Act May 17, 1950 CATHERINE CREEK, OR Sep 24, 1954 Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County Unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek, ID. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening, and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized on October 14, 1969. Mud Lake, ID, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1990. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Maiden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized on October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized on October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, ID. Emergency construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, ID. Channel improvement. Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. Whitebird Creek, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OR Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek near Union, OR. Project deauthorized in 1990. 30-16 H. Doc 531, 81st Congress, 2nd Session H. Doc. 280, 89th Cong., Ist Session. Oct 27, 1965 Sec 208, PL 83-780, Authorized by Chief Engineers. Sep 3, 1985 Oct 27, 1995 Table 30-G Table 30-E WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Project and Work Authorized Documents Text Act CLEAR AND BURNT RIVER, OR Jul 24, 1946 Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Huntington Waste Water Lagoon. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Dec 22, 1944 Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Jul 24, 1946 Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Oct 22, 1976 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 28, 1938 as amended Aug 18, 1941 Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Deauthorized in 1990. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete-lined Channel. Oct 31, 1992 Redesignation of reservoir to the Virgil B. Bennington Lake. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Sep 24, 1954 Gravel, brush, and small tree removal from 12 miles of Owyhee as amended River. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WA Oct 27, 1965 Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to portions of the city of Kennewick, WA. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM Jul 19, 1988 Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities at Lower Monumental, Ice Harbor, Little Goose, Lower Granite, and McNary Locks and Dams. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Jul 3, 1958 Preparation of detailed plans. Table 30-E Table 30-E 4. 30-17 Sec 14, PL 79-526, Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Jul 10, 1985 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Session PL 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report, dated May 13, 1946. PL 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3rd Session H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong. Sec 377, PL 77-228, Cong. 3rd Session Sec. 118 PL 102-580 102nd Cong. Sec. 208, PL 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Feb 11, 1985 PL 89-298, Sec. 201 PL 100-371 S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., Ist Session 5. Table 30-E Table 30-E 7. 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 TABLE 30-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Project and Work Authorized Documents Text Act Aug 15, 1963 Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. Oct 23, 1962 Dworshak Dam added Units 4, 5, and 6, Idaho. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized in FY 1990. Unit 4 was deauthorized in FY 95. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Mar 2, 1945 Unit I of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. as amended LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, LAKE BRYAN, WA Mar 2, 1945 Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Dec 31, 1970 Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, LOWER GRANITE LAKE, WA Mar 2, 1945 Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Mar 2, 1945 Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. May 25, 1978 Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. Oct 22, 1976 as amended Nov 17, 1986 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 17, 1986 Oct 22, 1976 Dec 29, 1981 Jul 30, 1983 LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. Changes to land acquisition authority. McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Construction, operation, and maintenance of a second powerhouse. McNary Lock and Dam Second Powerhouse automatically deauthorized on Nov 16, 1991. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. PL 88-96 PL 87-874 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session PL 91-638 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session PL 95-285 PL 94-587 H.R. 6 PL 99-662 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Session Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H.R. 6, PL 99-662 Sec. 1001, PL 99-362 PL 94-587 PL 97-140 PL 98-63 30-18 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Table F WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Project and Work Authorized Documents Text Act SNAKE RIVER TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA, AND ID Jun 13, 1902 Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Jun 25, 1910 Mouth to Riparia. Aug 30, 1935 Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. Mar 2, 1945 Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID, only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Table E Aug 18, 1941 Dayton, Touchet River, WA. Flood protection. Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR. Flood protection. Nov 17, 1986 Malheur Lake, OR. Flood damage. Table E Dec 22, 1944 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID. Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR. Flood protection. Table E Jul 11, 1956 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA. Levees and protective work. Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID. Construction of levee. Table E Oct 23, 1962 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID. Channel improvement. Lapwai Creek Culdesac, ID. Construct left bank levee Lyman Creek near Rexburg, ID. Channelization Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, WA. Levee and channel work. Oct 23, 1962 Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, ID. Storage for flood control. 3. and May 17, 1950 Jackson Hole, WY. Flood control protection by channel Table E improvement consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in vicinity of Wilson, WY. Nov 17, 1986 Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions are Federal responsibility. Nov 17, 1986 Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection. Table G Oct 23, 1962 Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, ID. Modification to increase spillway capacity. Authorized in Oct 1962 and Nov 17, 1986 deauthorized in 1986. Oct 27, 1965 Grande Ronde Lake, OR. Flood control, irrigation, and water. Supply, anadromous fish, downstream, and resident trout fishery, recreation, and downstream power. Nov 17, 1986 Deauthorized in 1986. Table G Nov 17, 1986 Cottonwood Creek Dam, ID. Protection to highly-developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Oct 1962, PL 89-298. Deauthorized in 1986. Table G Dec 22, 1944 Pullman, Palouse River, WA. Flood protection. Authorized Dec 1944. Deauthorized in 1986. Table G Nov 7, 1966 Stuart Gulch Dam, ID. Protection to highly-developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Nov 7, 1966. Deauthorized in 1979. H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong, 2nd Session H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong, 2nd Session Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 25, 72nd Cong, Ist Session H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2nd Session H. Doc. 662, 76th Cong., 3rd Session H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3rd Session PL 99-662 H. Doc. 452, 77th Cong., ist Session PL 87-685 PL 87-874 PL 87-874 PL 81-188 PL 99-662 PL 99-662 PL 87-874 PL 99-662 PL 89-298 PL 89-298 PL 99-662 H.D. 452, 77th Cong., Ist Session PL 89-789, Section 201 30-19 15. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-C NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Report See Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance For: Columbia River and Tributaries above Completed 1968 $1,851,195 Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary Projects. 30-20 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Project Status Report See Annual Construction Operation and Report For: (S) Maintenance ($) Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID' Completed 1951 12,019 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID' Completed 1970 133,518 Big Wood River, ID Completed 1985 784,930 Boise River, IDs Completed 1985 236,500 Catherine Creek, OR Completed 1990 28,800 Clear and Burnt River, OR Completed 1990 99,500 Colfax, Palouse River, WA Completed 1990 5,810,240 Connell, WA' Completed 1967 60,000 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Completed 1984 23,400 Culdesak, ID2 Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617 Dry Creek, WA' Completed 1961 384,426 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA' Completed 1967 293,092 Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA' Completed 1969 38,631 Gooding Area, ID' Completed 1954 86,126 Graves Creek, IDI Completed 1953 75,469 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Completed 1955 1,586,439 Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Completed 1978 2,504,245 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID' Completed 1972 176,833 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Completed 1973 113,296 Little Wood River, ID6 Active 1993 353,534 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA' Completed 1972 17,600 Lyman Creek, ID' Completed 1971 230,315 Malheur Lake Project, OR7 Completed 1990 4,729,348 Malheur Improvement District, Snake Completed 1957 138,608 River, OR Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 2,327,578 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID' Completed 1965 54,538 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River, Inactive 1949 23,050 Orofino, ID'2 Owyhee River, OR Completed 1990 69,316 Rapid Creek, ID' Completed 1985 19,500 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1977 110,815 Pataha Creek at Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1993 308,511 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Completed 1967 39,172 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA' Completed 1972 28,839 Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39,677,448 Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR2 Completed 1985 75,000 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR' Completed 1970 5,000 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1980 131,700 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, 11D Completed 1952 8,501 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1968 32,425 South Fork, Boise River, IDs Completed 1985 44,400 South Fork Clearwater River, Completed 1973 61,055 Kooskia-Sites, ID Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Completed 1955 128,635 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Completed 1973 72,140 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA' Completed 1971 74,305 Umatilla River, OR' Completed 1961 161,540 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR2 Completed 1960 16,118 Weiser River, IDs Completed 1985 293,739 30-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-E (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Project Status Report See Annual Construction Operation and Report For: ($) Maintenance (S) Willow Creek, ID' Completed 1963 976 Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed 1985 37,231,332 Yakima River, West Richland, WA"' Completed 1964 229,890 Zintel Canyon Dam, WA' Completed 1995 6,801,788 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 79-526. 3 Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 4 Exclusive of $9,000 contributed funds. 5 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 83-780. 6 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 99-662. No funds authorized until Fiscal Year 1990. 7 Exclusive of $853,712 contributed funds. ' Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 89-298. Construction began in 1992. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Project Report See Annual Construction Operation and Report For: (s) Maintenance (S) Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA 1990 23,409,832 TABLE 30-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Contributed Project Report See Annual Date Federal Funds Funds Report For: Deauthorized Expended (5) Expended (S) Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID and WA Blackfoot Reservoir, ID Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit Canyon County Unit Camas Creek, ID Catherine Creek Lake, OR Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID Dworshak Unit 4 Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID Grande Ronde Lake, OR Grande Ronde Valley, OR Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit Little Wood River, ID Lower Walla Walla River, WA Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit McNary Second Powerhouse, OR and WA Mill Creek, WA 1964 1980 1963 1963 1960 1978 1972 1993 1990 1966 1958 1968 1960 1953 1988 1961 1991 1958 1975 1986 1986 1967 1965 1990 1986 1995 1990 1986 1986 1986 1965 1986 1990 1969 1991 1977 267,626 46,084 10,600 9,080 1,552,000 195,686 655,000 169,195 21,334 4,000 13,000 5,671,000 3,537 30-22 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Contributed Project Report See Annual Date Federal Funds Funds Report For: Deauthorzed Expended ($) Expended (s) Mud Lake Area, ID 1957 1990 5,994 Palouse River, WA 1958 1986 2,000 Payette Valley, ID 1960 1978 23,178 Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID 1969 1969 Pullman, Palouse River, WA 1964 1986 289,109 - S. Fork Clearwater River, ID 1973 1986 3,899 - Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234, 100 - Teton River, ID 1955 1986 10,387 - Touchet River, WA 1957 1977 11,198 Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID 1960 1990 112,757 Whitebird Creek, ID 1957 1986 1,896 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION TABLE 30-H PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 1 OF TEXT) Estimated Project Status Federal Cost to Sep 30, Cost (5) 2000 ($) Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 209,403 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID, Snake River Unit Completed - 3,402,958 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 85,873 Malheur River, OR, Vale Unit Completed - 333,581 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID, Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,032' Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,348 TOTAL 10,917,34 Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL TABLE 30-I PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) Inspection project Complete Clearwater River, ID August 2000 Columbia River, WA September 2000 Lyman Creek, ID August 2000 Palouse River, WA September 2000 Portneuf River, ID July 2000 Potlatch River, ID June 2000 Salmon River, ID August 2000 Snake River, ID July 2000 Touchet River, WA September 2000 Tucannon River, WA September 2000 Walla Walla River, OR September 2000 Walla Walla River, WA November 2000 30-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIL~P URK Y UU PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT. AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (see Section 8 of text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1,600 Length of Shoreline Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 9 of Text) Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 cfs' 1,545 ft2 Tainter 50 by 56.4 ft 2 428 ft 3 2 @ 90,000 kW I @ 220,000 kW 400,000 kW 3 3 @ 220,000 kW 1,060,000 kW 717 ft March 1973 1,600 to 1,445 ft 1,605 ft 2,000,000 ac-ft 53.6 mi4 17,090 ac5 175 mi NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Open to Navigation 86 ft 675 ft 97 ft 100 ft 105 ft 16 ft May 1962 SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 ft Tainter 50 by 52.9 ft 10 30-24 TABLE 30-J WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT TABLE 30- (Continued) PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line 671 ft 3 @ 90,000 kW 3 @ 111,000 kW 603,000 kW 226 ft December 1961 Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 10 of text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line 440 to 437 ft 446 ft 31.9 mi 8,375 ac 14 by 250 ft 80 mi 86 ft 668 ft 93 ft 98 ft 101 ft 15 ft May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 ft Tainter 50 by 60 ft 8 656 ft 243 ft 6 135,000 kW 810,000 kW 226 ft March 1970 30-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 TABLE 304 (Continued) PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT. AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 11 of text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operation Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 681 ft Tainter 50 by 60 ft 8 656 ft 243 ft 6 135,000 kW 810,000 kW 228 ft April 1975 738 to 733 ft 746.5 ft 39.3 mi 8,900 ac 14 by 250 ft 91 mi 30-26 638 to 633 ft 646.5 ft 37.2 mi 10,025 ac 14 by 250 ft 92 mi 86 ft 674 ft 95 ft 100 ft 105 ft 15 ft May 1975 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT TABLE 30-J (Continued) PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 12 of text) McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (see Section 14 of text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Open to Navigation 86 ft 666 ft 97 ft 98 ft 103 ft 15 ft April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 ft Tainter 50 by 60 ft 8 656 ft 243 ft 6 135,000 kW 810,000 kW 242 ft May 1969 540 to 537 ft 548 ft 28.7 mi 6,590 ac 14 by 250 ft 78 mi 86 ft 683 ft 67 ft 75 ft 83 ft 15 ft November 1953 30-27 Ppjject REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 00 TABLE 30-J (Continued) PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 ft Vertical Lift 50 by 51 ft 22 1,348 ft 14 70,000 kW 980,000 kW 220 ft November 1953 IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Lenth of Shoreline 340 to 335 ft 356.5 ft 64 mi 38,800 ac 14 by 250 ft 242 mi cubic feet per second 2 feet Skilowatt Smiles acres 30-28 cubic feet per second 2 feet 3 kilowatt 4 miles 5 acres WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID TABLE 30-K (SEE SECTION 15 OF TEXT) Estimated Cost (Corps of New Work Maintenance to Percent Constr. Project Engineers Funds to September 30, 2000 September 30, 2000 Completed Started Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Initial Project $129,578,480 $129,578,480' $129,578,480' $161,487,197 $161,431,890 100 FY 56 Code 710 Rec Facilities 914,256 914,256 914,256 0 0 100 FY 57 Power Units 4-6 36,748,021 36,748,021 36,748,021 0 0 100 FY 71 Fish Bypass Program 87743 ' 40 429 000 40.388.000 0 0 46 FY 91 Totals 254,983,757 207,669,7574 207,628,757' 161,487,197 161,431,890 81 Little Goose Lock and Dam Initial Project 160,413,215 160,413,2155 160,413,215 111,624,564 111,572,010 100 FY 63 Power Units 4-6 60,941,807 60,941,807 60,941,807 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 72.626.000' 38.525.000 38.145.000 0 0 23 FY 89 Totals 293,981,022 259,880,022' 259,500,022 s 111,624,564 111,572,010 88 Lower Granite Lock and Dam Initial Project 321,503,981 321,503,9816 321,503,9796 156,967,303 156,557,120 100 FY 65 Code 710 Rec Facilities 63,800 63,800 63,800 0 0 100 FY 84 Power Units 4-6 46,212,534 46,212,534 46,212,534 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 83,351,000' 31,427.000 31,411,000 0 0 38 FY 88 Totals 451,131,315 399,207,3156 399,191,3136 156,967,303 156,557,120 88 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,3617 184,712,3617 115,117,904 114,890,361 100 FY 61 Power Units 4-6 51,661,371 51,661,371 51,661,371 0 0 100 FY 75 Fish Bypass Program 97.480.000 32.674.000 32.243.000 0 0 33 FY 90 Totals 333,853,7323 269,047,732 268,616,732 115,117,904 114,890,361 80 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,613' 34,613 401,5832 397,498 Open River Pasco to Lewiston 0 0 0 4.350 4,350 Totals Existing Project 1,333,984,439 1,135,839,439 1,134,971,437 545,602,901 544,853,229 85 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project $1,334,384,589 $1,136,239,589' $1,135,371,5873 $545,789,471 $545,039,799 New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2 Includes $2,064 appropriated and $3,180 expended in FY 96 for project condition survey cost. Does not include mitigation analysis. Includes $203,000 appropriated and $201,931 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 5 Includes $370,000 appropriated and $358,589 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 6 Includes $1,628,000 appropriated and $1,626,084 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 7 Includes $11,132,000 appropriated and $10,949,493 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. ' Includes $13,333,000 appropriated and $13,136,097 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 30-29 HONOLULU ENGINEER DISTRICT* The civil works responsibilities of the Honolulu District encompasses the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that its area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii ........................................... 31-2 2. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii.................31-2 3. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 31-2 4. Inspection of Completed Flood Control and Beach Erosion Control Projects ............31-2 5. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................ 31- 2 Erosion Control 6. Alii Drive Shoreline Protection, Hawaii Hawaii .. ............................................... 3.1..- 3 7. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .............................. ........... 31-3 Flood Control 8. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................................ 31-3 General Investigations 9. Surveys .................................... ..... 31-3 10. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............. 31-3 11. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.....31-4 Tables Table 31-A Cost and Financial Statement.....................................1-5 Tables (Contd.) Page Table 31-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 31-6 Table 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................... 31-7 Table 31-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............. 31-8 Table 31-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 31-9 Table 31-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power........... 31-9 Table 31-G Deauthorized Projects ............... 33 1-10 Table 31-H Condition Surveys of Navigation Projects................... 31-11 Table 31-I Inspection of Completed Flood Control and Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................ 31-11 Table 31-J Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 ................................. 31-12 Table 31-K Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14.................31-13 Table 31-L Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103 ...............3 1-13 Table 31-M Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 ....................... 31-13 Table 31-N Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Pursuant to Section 1135 ............. ................ 31-14 Table 31-0 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to Section 206 ............... 31-14 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. Kikiaola Harbor is located on the southwest coast of the island of Kauai, approximately 1 mile southeast of Kekaha and approximately 2 miles west of Waimea (See NOAA Chart 19386) Existing project. The authorized project consists of removing a 150-foot long portion from an existing outer east stub breakwater; removing and reconstructing a 85- foot long inner east stub breakwater; modifying 220- foot long portion of the existing west breakwater; modifying 820-foot long portion of the existing east breakwater; dredging a new 700-foot long entrance channel to a depth of 11-feet and varying in width from 105 to 205-feet; and dredging a 320-foot long access channel to a 7-foot depth and varying in width from 70 to 105-feet. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is being prepared and negotiated with the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There is a existing 1280-foot long east breakwater with two short stub breakwaters; a 600-foot long west breakwater; a 150-foot long by 10- foot wide wooden wharf; a 50-foot long loading dock and adjacent launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continuation of plans and specifications and environmental coordination. The plans and specifications phase were approximately 95% complete as of September 30, 2000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $60,330. 2. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is delayed due to resolution of environmental concerns as a result of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. The PCA is being coordinated with the local sponsor for execution prior to construction. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continuing coordination with the local sponsor and various agencies on controversial environmental issues, continuing development of acceptable mitigation features for impacts to environmental resources and performing a physical model study of the alternatives to address environmental concerns. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $602,203. The plans and specifications phase was approximately 80% complete as of September 30, 2000. 3. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted by contract at Aunuu, Auasi, Ofu and Tau Harbors in American Samoa and Hilo Harbor on the island of Hawaii in April 2000. Total cost to conduct these surveys was $84,324. Inspections of navigation projects were performed during the fiscal year. See Table 31-H for projects inspected. 4. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL AND BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is performed periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood-protection works approved by the Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Inspection costs for completed flood control and beach erosion control projects incurred during the Fiscal Year were $268,627. See Table 31-I for inspections performed during this fiscal year. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). See Table 31-J. 31-2 HONOLULU DISTRICT Beach Erosion Control 6. ALII DRIVE SHORELINE PROTECTION, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. The project is located along Alii Drive in the town of Kailua-Kona on the western coast of the Island of Hawaii. The Island of Hawaii is located approximately 180 miles southeast of Honolulu, Hawaii and approximately 2,600 miles southwest of Los Angeles, California. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. The project construction consists of pumping concrete into geotextile bags that are placed into existing voids along the 700-foot reach Alii Drive seawall. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in March 1999. Requirements are described in full on Page 31-3 of the FY99 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There is a 700-foot long seawall along Alii Drive, constructed by the County of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in June 1999 and physically completed in January 2000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $29,688. 7. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526, as amended (Preauthorization). See Table 31-K. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874, as amended (Preauthorization). See Table 31-L. Flood Control 8. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (Preauthorization). See Table 31-M. Project Modifications for Improvements of Environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (Preauthorization). See Table 31-N. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303. (Preauthorization) See Table 31-0. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $304,058 of which $290,438 was for disaster preparedness; and $10,351 for emergency operations; $3,269 for field investigations. General Investigations 9. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $777,068 of which $223,031 was for navigation studies; $107,900 was for flood damage prevention studies; $37,134 for special studies; $51,407 for miscellaneous activities; and $357,596 for coordination with other agencies. In addition, $78,265 in non-Federal funds for coordination with other agencies; -$24,662 for cost-shared flood damage prevention studies; and $248,047 for cost-shared navigation studies. 10. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. The Flood Plain Management Services Program is authorized and implemented under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Non- Federal agencies are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas without charge. As of November 1991, Federal agencies and private entities were also offered these services on a cost recovery basis. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance Requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 10. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Contd.) Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 2,200, which included services to Federal agencies, state and local government agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and other private parties. Costs for providing these services during the fiscal year were $303,584. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $2,691. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $306,275. 11. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI - As directed by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1998, preconstruction engineering and design studies were continued in Fiscal Year 2000. Work during the Fiscal Year consisted of continued coordination with local sponsors and other interested parties; continued preparation of environmental documentation and construction plan and specifications. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $63,361. 31-4 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 1. Kikiaola Small New Work: Boat Harbor, Approp. 326,000 218,000 100,000 75,000 1,295,000 Kauai, HI Cost 286,100 183,846 140,237 60,330 1,246,475 (Federal Funds) 2. Maalaea Harbor New Work: Maui, HI Approp. 359,700 649,000 372,000 484,000 3,749,700 (Federal Funds) Cost 412,454 575,013 330,836 602,203 3,707,623 6. Alii Drive Shore- New Work: line Protection Approp. 50,000 0 103,000 0 360,000 Hawaii, HI Cost 13,783 33,262 95,198 29,688 357,875 (Federal Funds) (Contributed Contrib. 0 0 126,000 0 126,000 Funds) Cost 0 0 66,117 53,115 119,232 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII A 700-foot long, 105 to 205-foot wide, and I1 -foot deep entrance channel; a 320-foot long, 70 to 105-foot wide, and 7-foot deep access channel; modification of 220-foot portion of the existing west breakwater; and modification of 820-foot portion of the existing east breakwater; removal and reconstruction of a 85-foot long inner east breakwater; removal of a 150-foot long portion of the existing outer east stub breakwater. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel. Sec 101, PL 90-483 Cong., 2nd sess. Sec 101, PL 90-483 Cong., 2nd sess. 31-6 Aug. 3, 1968 Aug. 3, 1968 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 2000 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,798 ' $ 52,555 Agat Harbor, Guam Completed 1989 2,000,000 2 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,015 ' 141,797 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,129 4 1,413,179 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 53,519,193 s 2,247,953 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,047 6 498,402 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1991 5,512,440 4,106,308 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,036 7 63,693 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 16,044,095 ' 4,803,957 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,867 9 --- Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1984 7,203,221 't 8,222,952 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,997 9 3,127 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Inactive 1990 171,400 --- Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1998 12,043,839 " 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,000 12 41,857 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000 --- Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,623,450 3--- Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1986 372,000 14 495,256 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1987 2,127,724 '5 11,047,279 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,513 16 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,018 7 5,054,930 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523 9 --- Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1984 752,645 "1 3,081,225 Rota Harbor, CNMI Completed 1985 2,000,000 9 436,200 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Deferred 1982 194,000 --- Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1985 1,991,569 20 546,600 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,011 21 122,400 Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed 1950 2,448,056 22 2,111 IAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 2In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,239,364 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. SIn addition, Contributed Funds of $2,402,909 for Construction. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 71n addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. aIn addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 1 n addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 1In addition, Contributed Funds of $499,328 for Construction. 12Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, Ist Session). 1 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $364,757 for Construction. 14In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 1s5 n addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. 16 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. '7 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. sI1n addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. 19Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. 20Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 21In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 22Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 2000 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,015 ' $ Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,181 2 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 4 Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 5 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,996 6 Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313 7 Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,472 Lepua Area, American Samoa Completed 1992 1,706,225 9 Masefau Bay, American Samoa Completed 1992 500,000 2 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,000 2 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Completed 1987 189,500 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,941 2 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Deferred 1978 394,187 "o Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,040 " Saipan Beach Road, CNMI Completed 1992 176,000 2 Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,879 12 Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1992 1,313,400 13 Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,309 14 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1979 729,087 '5 183,00( 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. SAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $485,371 in Contributed Funds. 1oAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. IIAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 12Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. 13Authorized for construction by Public Law 100D71. In addition, $1,226,486 in Contributed Funds. '4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 15In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 31-8 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 2000 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1997 11,231,121 -7 Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,867 1 lao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,621,108 356,523 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1998 4,672,021 2--- Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1990 10,988,750 3 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 4 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 5 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1987 4,345,899 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 6 Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 5 Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 -- 'In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $679,205 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. in Contributed Funds. 31n addition, $645,992 in Contributed Funds. 7In addition, $787,426 in Contributed Funds. 4Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation sAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, construction cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in $1,234,147 in Contributed Funds. Contributed Funds. TABLE 31-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 2000 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Completed 1994 $ 8,000,000 $ Federated States of Micronesia 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 31-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 November 1986 S 40,117 $ PL 99-662 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1967 November 1977 HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 November 1981 HD #97-59 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 November 1986 PL 99-662 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 January 1990 1,481 PL 99-662 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 July 1981 86,235 Director of Civil Works Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, 1979 July 1981 221,500 Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, 1966 January 1990 133,188 292,441 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, --- January 1990 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 Director of Civil Works Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1977 January 1990 186,937 PL 99-662 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, 1972 January 1990 30,378 Oahu, Hawaii PL 99-662 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii --- January 1990 PL 99-662 Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa --- November 1991 PL 99-662 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 31-10 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-G (Contd.) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas --- November 1991 PL 99-662 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam --- August 1981 80,764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 PL 99-662 TABLE 31-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Location Dates of Inspection Navigation Projects Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii April 2000 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii June 2000 Kahului Deep Draft Harbor, Maui, Hawaii July 2000 Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii February 2000 Pohoiki Launch Ramp Facility, Hawaii, Hawaii February 2000 Rota Harbor, CNMI May 2000 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii June 2000 TABLE 31-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL AND BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Location Dates of Inspection Flood Control Projects Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Asan Village, Guam Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii Kaneohe-Kailua Dam, Oahu, Hawaii January 2000 December 1999 December 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 31-I (Contd.) INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL AND BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Dates of Inspection Flood Control Projects Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Namo River, Guam Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Wailoa Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Beach Erosion Control Projects Afono Area, American Samoa Aoa Area, American Samoa Asquiroga Bay, Guam Lepua Area, American Samoa Masefau Bay, American Samoa Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Poloa Area, American Samoa Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Vatia Area, American Samoa November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 May 2000 January 2000 January 2000 November 1999 November 1999 May 2000 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 July 2000 November 1999 TABLE 31-J NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Hilo Light Draft Navigation, Hawaii, Hawaii $4,222 Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 55,835 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii 1,713 Rota East Harbor, CNMI 60,583 Coordination Account 10,397 TOTAL $132,750 31-12 Location HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-K EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Hauula Highway, Oahu, Hawaii $965 Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 3,969 Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii 6,818 Power Plant Road, Guam 6,703 Punaluu Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 8,575 South Agat, Guam 24,602 Coordination Account -1,478 TOTAL $50,154 TABLE 31-L BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103 PUBLIC LAW 87-874, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Commercial Port Road, CNMI $41,492 TOTAL $41,492 TABLE 31-M FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Keopu-Hienaloli Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii 56,616 Wailele Stream, Oahu, Hawaii 76,418 Coordination Account 6,259 TOTAL $139,293 31-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 31-N PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF ENVIRONMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii $30,508 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii 1,945 Initial Appraisal Reports 4,832 Coordination Account 7,904 TOTAL $45,189 TABLE 31-0 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 206, PUBLIC LAW 104-303 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Saipan Lagoon, CNMI Preliminary Restoration Plans Coordination Account TOTAL $300,652 46,569 9,912 12,086 $369,219 31-14 ALASKA DISTRICT* This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ........................................ 2. Cook Inlet, AK ......... .............. ...... ................. 3. Chignik Harbor, AK .............. .......... ................... 4. Dillingham Harbor, AK........... ............. ................. 5. Douglas Harbor, AK .............. ........... ................. 6. False Pass Harbor, AK ................ ...... ........... 7. Homer Harbor, AK ..................... ..... .......... 8. Kake Harbor, AK ............... .............. 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK............ ............ ................ 10. Ninilchik Harbor, AK ............. ............. ................. 11. Sitka Harbor, AK ..... .......... .. .. ............. 12. St. George, AK .............. ......... ................. 13. St. Paul Island Harbor, AK........................... ........ 14 Unalaska Harbor, AK .............. ........ ................. 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-5 Flood Control 15. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK ........................... ..... 32-5 16. Chena River Lakes, AK ........ ........... ................ 32-5 17. Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization .......... 32-6 18. Homer Spit Erosion, AK ........ ......... ............3..2. -6 19. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........ .............................. 32-6 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Project ........ ............. ........................ 32-6 General Investigations 21. Surveys .................... ..... ................. 32-6 22. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... .............. 32-6 23. Preconstruction Engineering and Design............... 32-7 Tables Table 32-A Cost & Financial Statement ................ 32-9 Table 32-B Authorizing Legislation ......................... 32-13 Table 32-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 32-17 Table 32-D Not Applicable Table 32-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........ ......................... 32-18 Table 32-F Not Applicable Table 32-G Deauthorized Projects .......................... 32-18 Table 32-H Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............ ............................ 32-19 Table 32-I Project Condition Surveys ........ .............. 32-19 Table 32-J Stream Bank Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ............................. ................. 32-20 Table 32-K Environmental Activities ........ .............. 32-20 -32-1- _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in south-central Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along 3,300 foot baseline adjacent to the port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water. The tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29 feet with an extreme range of 41 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of two POL terminals at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977, was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. The Corps hopper dredge ESSAYONS was mobilized to perform emergency dredging in late Nevember and early December. There was 565,000 cubic yards removed by the ESSAYONS to free the port for vessel traffic. Maintenance dredging by contract was conducted in three periods from May until the end of October. A total of 893,236 cubic yards was removed from the project in FY 00. The fourth and final year of the continuing contract was carried out by J.E. McAmis of Chico, California. 2. COOK INLET NAVIGATION, AK Location. Southern flank of Knik Arm Shoal about 6 miles southwest of Anchorage, AK. Existing project. Navigation channel 310-meters (1,017) feet wide, 11.5 meters (38-feet) deep, about 3,330-meters (10,925-feet) long. Limiting natural depths along the navigation range line are about 9.0 meters for a width of 1,000 meters, an additional 60-meters width for advance maintenance is authorized. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. This project would reduce delays for the container ships that supply cargo for 80 percent of the Alaskan people. Ships have to wait for high tide to safely cross the Knik Annrm Shoal and would rarely have to wait once the authorized channel is complete. Operations during fiscal year. The PCA was executed on 9 Jan 98. Construction contract was awarded on 2 Dec 98 and was completed in September 2000 for a combined Federal and Contributed Cost of $10,507,100. A total of 1,459,543 cubic yards were removed in the two seasons of dredging by Manson Constructiion. 3. CHIGNIK HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Chignik is located on the south side of the Alaska Peninsula about 450 miles southwest of Anchorage. Existing project. The city of Chignik is situated on the south shore of Alaska Peninsula in Southwestern Alaska. It is an active and growing island port whose economy is heavily dependent on commercial fishing. The local fleet presently anchors in the ice free, but inadequately protected harbor or ties up at the exposed city dock. At present boats are subject to overcrowding and hazardous mooring conditions between fishing periods. The anchorage is exposed to all storms from the southeast clockwise to the northwest. The violent southeast and northwest storms often damage and sometimes destroy boats by forcing them ashore or on the exposed rock reefs at low tides. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The proposed project would provide a protected harbor, which would produce benefits in the form of reduced boat damage, increased fish harvest, and a harbor of refuge. The average annual navigation benefits attributable to the project are currently estimated at $1,695,400. Operations during fiscal year. Endangered species coordination was completed during Fiscal Year 2000. The Plans and Specifications were being completed for advertisement in Fiscal Year 2001. The PCA was executed on 18 August 2000. 4. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. Dillingham Harbor is located at the head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of Nushagak River, just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeast of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 0.0 feet mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek with an entrance channel 250 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek and a rock sill across its outlet. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks at the city of Dillingham three privately owned, one owned by the city. -32-2- ALASKA DISTRICT Four publicly owned small boat floats located in the Harbor basin were installed in June 1982. They are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Facilities are inadequate for the number of boats using the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Annual maintenance dredging was carried out by Nehalem River Dredging in June with the removal of 76,475 cubic yards. This was year 1 of a 2 year continuing contract. 5. DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK Location. The City of Douglas is located about 2 miles southeast of Juneau along the Gastineau Channel on Douglas Island in southeast Alaska. (See NOAA charts 17315, 17300, and 16016.) Existing Project. Provides for a 5.2 acre small boat basin with an entrance channel both to a depth of 12 feet below MLLW. A rock jetty 105 feet in length protects the project from wave damage. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The small boat basin has three main floats with power, lighting, and water; a launch ramp is available for public use. The city dock is located at the harbor entrance. Fuel, repair facilities, and lodging are available in Juneau. Operations during fiscal year. The last maintenance dredging was accomplished by J.E. McAmis in September 1997. The entrance channel was widened, straightened, and dredged to 2 feet over project depth; 24,242 cubic yards were removed from the project. The next scheduled project condition survey is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2000. 6. FALSE PASS, AK Location. False Pass is a small community located on the east side of Unimak Island, which is the east end of the Aleutian Island chain in Southwest Alaska. False Pass is approximately 700 air miles from Anchorage. Existing project. The recommended plan will accommodate a fleet of 88 vessels in a 5.2 acre basin protected by two rubble-mound breakwaters, 1,300 feet and 600 feet in length. The project will require dredging of the inner basin and the entrance channel. Plans and specifications are being completed for construction in Fiscal Year 2003. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. The feasibility study was initiated in 1999. The project was authorized in the Water and Resources Development Act of 2000. Plans and specifications are currently being developed. 7. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water, southwest of Anchorage. The harbor site is near the extremity of Homer Spit, a narrow extension of land protruding southeasterly some 4.5 miles into the bay. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit, about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the west end of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the east end. The entrance channel is protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The facilities consist of one publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled the size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Annual maintenance dredging was conducted by Nehalem River Dredging during September. Removed from the project entrance were 7,500 cubic yards of material, and 3,000 cubic yards were dredged from the Coast Guard berth. 8. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake, a community of 700, is located in Southeastern Alaska about 40 miles west of Petersburg and 800 miles northwest of Seattle. Existing project. Commercial fishing and logging are the primary industries in the area. A feasibility report was completed in 1968, and the recommended project was authorized for construction. The authorized project, adjacent to the city, was estimated to cost $13.2 million in 1986 dollars. The project includes construction of a rubblemound breakwater at the Portage Cove site. The average annual benefits amount to $785 thousand, all for commercial navigation. The benefit to -32-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 cost ratio is 1.5, based on the authorized interest rate. The city of Kake is the local sponsor, with financial support from the State. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on 26 Nov 1997. Operation during fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 29 April 1998 to Kake Tribal Logging & Timber Corporation for $14,554,257. The breakwater is physically completed in October 2000 at a total cost of $15,825,588. 9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. The existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. The new basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities consist of one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. The existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. The project is physically complete; contractor claims are pending. 10. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. Ninilchik Harbor is located at the mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the village of Ninilchik. The community of Ninilchik, AK, is about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 400 feet long by 150 feet wide is dredged to an elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by two rock jetties. Modifications for river channel diversion, the 2 armor rock jetties, and beach protection were accomplished in 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in the project basin, provided by the state of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using the harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished during May 2000 by Nehalem River Dredging. During that time 9,000 cubic yards of material was removed, and temporarily stored in a bermed site on the upper beach adjacent to the harbor. The Alaska DOT utilizes the material on local roadways. 11. SITKA HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Sitka is located in southeastern Alaska, about 95 miles south-southwest of Juneau. It is situated on the western coast of 1,600 square mile Baranof Island. Sitka is about 20 miles from the open Pacific Ocean on the east side of Sitka Sound. Existing project. The recommended plan, also known as the Channel Rock plan, consists of three rubblemound breakwaters constructed across the northern end of the western anchorage, and an inner harbor facility placed adjacent to Thomsen Harbor. This project created a large protected harbor in which moorage basins could be developed using minimal or no wave protection structures. The three breakwaters are 480 feet, 1,200 feet, and 320 feet long. Navigation openings in the breakwater, 325 feet and 190 feet wide at the design depth, are located at natural channels where water depths are 50 to 55 feet at mean lower low water. Two gaps allow for vessel traffic separation, which may be particularly important when log rafts or barges are being towed through the western anchorage. The two breakwaters forming the southern opening overlap to minimize ocean swell in Thomsen Harbor. The breakwaters are placed directly on the submerged rock reefs forming the northern boundary of western Anchorage. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 7 December 1993. Operations during fiscal year. The Channel Rock Breakwaters were physically completed in 1995. During construction 192,318 cubic yards of core rock, 65,330 cubic yards of secondary rock, and 52,867 cubic yards of armor stone were placed. Construction was completed in June 1996. A study on the breakwater effect on the herring population was -32-4- ALASKA DISTRICT completed in 1998 and showed no ill effects on the fish population. 12. ST. GEORGE, AK Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. The project was authorized in the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, P.L. 102- 377. The work consists of excavating the St. George Harbor entrance channel to 20 feet below mean lower low water in accordance with cost-sharing provisions in P.L. 99-662. Local cooperation. The portion of the project was done by the Local Sponsor under Section 215, P.L. 90-483 with reimbursement to the Local Sponsor by the Government for its share on completion. Operations during the fiscal year. The Local Sponsor completed the portion of the project under the Section 215 agreement. Work on the remainder of the project is scheduled to be initiated in FY 2002. 13. ST. PAUL ISLAND HARBOR, AK Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove, the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was submitted for approval. Operations during the fiscal year. Congress authorized improvements to the breakwater, the entrance channel, and the maneuvering area in WRDA of 1996. Model testing and design work on these improvements continued during 1998. The construction contract for Phase I to build the three underwater reefs was awarded 19 March 1999 for $10,411,000 and is 55% complete at the end of the 2000 season. The Phase II construction contract for dredging the harbor will be awarded in FY 2002. A small boat harbor was authorized in WRDA 99 and it will be added to the Phase II construction contract. 14. UNALASKA HARBOR, AK Location. Unalaska is located on Unalaska Island on the east end of the Aleutian chain in Southwest Alaska. Unalaska is approximately 800 air miles from Anchorage. Existing project. The community enjoys a strategic position as the center of a rich fishing area, and for trans - shipment of cargo between Pacific Rim trading partners. The proposed Little South America Harbor would be on the south end of Amaknak Island. The harbor would be protected by stub rubblemound and floating breakwaters. The estimated project cost is $20 million, and the benefit cost ratio is estimated at 1.3. The City of Unalaska is the sponsor for the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. The feasibility study was initiated in 1999. Authorized for construction in WRDA 2000 contingent upon the Chief's report being completed by 31 December 2001. Flood Control 15. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Bethel, AK is located in southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 400 miles west of Anchorage. Existing project. The project consists of rock riprap toe protection to be installed on the unprotected river bank and at locations where existing city construction bulkheads are threatened by erosion. This includes 4,000 feet of unprotected riverbank and 4,200 feet of previously installed bulkheads. The construction contract was awarded on 26 May 1995. Emergency erosion protection for the Bethel Cargo Dock and the Mission Road Bulkhead began in July 1995 and continued through FY 1995 due to accelerated erosion that accumulated after spring runoff. Location cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on 3 March 1994. Terminal facilities. The POL tank farm is situated at the downstream end of the project and the city's general cargo dock is at the upstream end of the project. Operations during fiscal year. The project was physically complete in September 1997, except for seeding the sloped riverbanks. The total project cost was $24,000,000 of which Bethel contributed $6,000,000. Credit for land and rights of way is pending. Contractor claims are pending. 16. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. Chena River Lakes is located in the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, D1, D2, and Big Delta D6.) -32-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek is located 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on the Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately seven miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22 mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Operations during fiscal year. The lower Chena River dredging that was initiated in 1999 was completed over the winter with the removal of an additional 24,000 cubic yards of material. The boat launch at the Federal project is also dredged during the winter months. 17. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Dillingham is located 350 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska. The project is located along the southeastern edge of Dillingham adjacent to the Nushagak River. Erosion of the toe of the bluff in this area is endangering critical utilities and numerous buildings and homes. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,600-foot long steel sheetpile bulkhead along the toe of the bluff from the Dillingham City Cargo dock to Snag Point. An additional 600 feet of bulkhead with riprap revetment was constructed at the small boat harbor. The sheetpile wall will be constructed to an elevation of 28 feet MLLW. Mitigation measures including emergency access ladders and eyebolts for anchoring setnets used for by subsistence fishermen are included in the project. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed in January 1998. Terminal Facilities. Dillingham has a general cargo dock adjacent to the authorized project. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in September 1998 in the amount of 1,798,850. Construction of the project was performed and a mod was awarded for $1,389,472. A second construction contract was awarded to complete the construction of the storm drain removed from the original contract. 18. HOMER SPIT, AK Location. The project is located near the town of Homer, Alaska, 120 miles southwest of Anchorage. Part of the city is located on a 4.5 mile long finger of land that varies in width from 30 to 500 yards wide extending into Kachemak Bay. Existing Project. The authorized project, which was constructed in 1994, consists of 1,400 feet of rock revetment. The revetment was extended an additional 3,700 feet along the road by the Fiscal Year 1996 Appropriation Bill. Local Cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed detailing cost sharing of the project. Operations during fiscal year. The contract for the additional 3700 feet of revetment was completed and closed out in June 1998. Surveys are scheduled to be done annually and the beach replenished in 2004. 19. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $411,956 for disaster preparedness, and field investigations. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of the following flood control works: Bethel Bank Stabilization at Bethel; Deering Streambank Protection at Deering; Metlakatla Erosion Protection at Metlakatla; Homer Spit Revetments at Homer; Tanana River Levee at Fairbanks, Talkeetna River at Talkeetna; Lowell Creek at Seward; Klutina River at Copper Center; Skagway River at Skagway; Gold Creek at Juneau; and Emmonak Streambank Protection on the Yukon River at Emmonak. An inspection was made of the shore protection works at Nome. General Investigation 21. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,798,982 of which $2,087,769 was for navigation studies, $18,504 for flood damage prevention studies, $157,956 for special studies, $110,579 for miscellaneous studies, and $339,826 for coordination studies with other agencies. In addition contributed funds in the amount of $1,475,860 were expended: $10,984 for Wrangell Harbor navigation studies, $182,213 for preconstruction engineering and design works under Sand Point, and $172,220 for coordination studies with other agencies. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain manage-ment guidance, and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, state agencies, Architectural Engineering firms, ALASKA DISTRICT lending institutions, and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $171,918. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $21,862. 23. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SAND POINT, AK Location. Sand Point is a commercial fishing community on the Pacific coast off the southwestern Alaska Peninsula. Sand Point is about 570 air miles southwest of Anchorage and about midway between Kodiak and Dutch Harbor. The harbor provides close access to one of the State's most productive fishing areas. For the past few years the population has been stable at around 1,000. The economy is based almost wholly on commercial fishing. This study is in partial response to the Rivers and harbors in Alaska study resolution, adopted by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Public Works on 2 December 1970. The study was requested by the Aleutians East Borough to investigate navigation improvements at Sand Point, Alaska. The harbor currently provides no permanent protected moorage for vessels larger than 80 feet. In recent years, the fleet operating in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Island area, made up primarily of vessels ranging from 80 to 160 feet, has grown significantly. Skippers fishing in the Sand Point area currently travel long distances to secure protected moorage. Existing Project. The proposed harbor improvements at Sand Point consist of construction of a 570-foot and a 730-foot breakwater from shore to form the basin and entrance channel of the new harbor. The crest height of the rubblemound breakwaters would be +16 ft MLLW. The breakwaters would be designed to withstand the forces of a 6.6 foot wave. The entrance channel would be dredged to -18 ft MLLW, it would be 120 feet wide to allow one-way traffic of vessels 150 feet in length with a 34-foot beam and 10.5 foot draft. The mooring basin would be dredged to a depth of-17 ft MLLW and would provide room for 37 vessels. Local Cooperation. A Preconstruction Engineering and Design Agreement was signed on 10 July 1998. Operations during fiscal year. The feasibility report was approved by Pacific Ocean Division on 14 May 1998. Plans and specifications were initiated and are scheduled to be completed in November 2000. SEWARD HARBOR, AK Location. Seward, located on the Kenai Peninsula is about 125 miles south of Anchorage, Alaska by road. The town is located at the northern end of Ressurection Bay off the Gulf of Alaska and can be reached by air, sea and rail as well as road. It lies at about 60 degrees 6 minutes N Latitued and 149 degrees 2 minutes W longitude. Existing Project. The current harbor is filled to capacity with a waiting list of more than 330 boats. The Feasibility Report recommends expansion of the existing harbor eastward. The recommended project would accommodate 339 additional vessels and cost $11,930,000. Local Cooperation. A Pre-construction Engineering and Design Agreement was signed on 23 April 1999. Operations during fiscal year. The feasibility study was completed 28 September 1998. Plans and specifications were initiated and are scheduled to be completed. No federal construction funding was available for the project, so plans and specifications were delayed. The plans and specifications will be completed when funding is provided for construction. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. Nome Harbor is located at the mouth of the Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on the northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of the Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. The federal navigation project, at 8 feet below mean lower low water, consists of a dogleg entrance channel 75 feet wide by 1550 feet long running form Norton Sound to a turning basin 250 feet wide by 600 feet long, located at the confluence of the Snake River with Dry and Bourbon Creeks. The entrance is flanked to seaward by a 400 foot eastern jetty and a 240 foot western jetty and is further protected through its length by a steel sheet pile revetment on both sides. The eastern waterfront is protected by a 3350 foot long seawall that extends from the eastern jetty. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters the dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where a lighterage company has transfer facilities -32-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 which are open to the public. Facilities are considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for off-loading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. Received authorization for a project consisting of a harbor complex that includes a new breakwater that protects the existing causeway docks. Provides for a new entrance to the existing small boat harbor and a sediment management scheme to keep the channel open. A design agreement was fashioned. Annual maintenance dredging was carried out in the northsouth portion of the entrance channel in June with the removal of 3,300 cubic yards. The work was accomplished by Portable Hydraulic Dredging of Portland, Oregon. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the northwest side of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. The project consists of a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor; a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about one foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) The Heritage Harbor was authorized to be built in the Cemetery Point site in WRDA 99. This project will consist of two breakwaters and dredging an entrance channel and inner harbor area. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement will be executed when construction funds are appropriated. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing of small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. A feasibility study for a new harbor was initiated in FY 97 and was authorized in WRDA 99. -32-8- ALASKA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 30 Sep 00 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Cook Inlet Navigation, AK (Contrib. Funds) Chignik Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Douglas Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 986,000 967,277 1,849,400 967,277 533,235 533,235 1,650,210 6,816,434 41,425,156 1,657,733 6,812,665 41,408,112 638,080 638,080 104,000 4,488,928 179,000 2,837,000 8,057,928 162,013 338,426 3,979,208 3,133,052 8,003,307 25,000 2,428,000 2,797,031 25,000 1,483,671 1,852,645 14,500 14,772 n 701 8,562 364,500 357,989 383,000 386,332 166,000 97,000 214,978 108,929 619,699 622,572 92,660 91,258 389,076 379,152 11,178,210 390,355 381,114 11,192,815 1,700 1,700 100,000 35,461 670,411 -10,556 657,850 2,004 57,831 6,701 100,000 99,993 1,101,855 724,226 -32-9- TABLE 32-A 2. 4. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 30 Sep00 6. False Pass Harbor, AK Mt .. r (Contrib. Funds) Homer Harbor, AK Kake Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Ninilchik Harbor, AK 11. Sitka Harbor, AK (Contributed Funds) eiNw WorK Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 150,000 230,000 67,962 252,472 85,000 222,113 23,648 219,312 158,000 161,980 149,800 147,221 194,333 198,107 195,325 195,766 380,000 320,434 307,113 242,960 3,512,350 3,512,350 6,187,571 5,866,593 67,974 67,974 294,658 3,381,000 6,779,000 4,279,000 14,733,658 250,469 2,735,073 6,580,523 4,931,274 14,497,339 580,000 632,000 375,000 1,587,000 - 53,856 509,710 764,683 1,328,249 68,500 15,000 76,666 25,905 36,813 5,258,941 3,179 55,:225577,,887744 148,520 148,520 890,144 724,651 428,720 428,720 152,000 160,800 187,451 193,859 5,697,549 150,531 159,906 188,825 195,361 5,696,937 100,000 104,333 2061 182,888 17,663 6,639,144 6,569,280 325,000 1,238,400 5624 1,240,519 -32-10- TABLE 32-A 8. 9. 10. ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 30 Sep 00 St. George, AK (Contrib. Funds) 13. St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 14. Unalaska Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 15. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (Contributed Funds) 16. Chena River Lakes, AK (Contrib. Funds) 12. 29,176 -23,278 58 554 7,000,000 9,375 5,027,182 3,004,000 2,777,682 339,000 2,313,000 4,254,452 22,287,200 229,584 1,570,220 4,765,051 21,393,749 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 6,728 191,000 101,000 80,445 204,320 224,662 150,000 356 245,576 5,898,000 2,384,000 9,523,085 2,406,578 3,190,000 3,177,444 2,229,725 2,150,698 936,000 957,145 425,474 425,464 1,819,836 425,360 292,000 284,765 374,662 245,932 19,484,854 16,327 19,261,438 4,690,000 4,275,000 214,063,928 214,054,134 1,825,500 3,066,448 2,124,267 18,849,297 1,246,709 3,725,421 2,131,442 16,861,492 12,000 2,194,300 12,000 2,157,929 -32-11- 4987 195,010 4987 195,000 1,593,450 200,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 30 Sep 00 17. Dillingham Emergency New Work Bank Stabilization Approp. Cost 18. Homer Spit Erosion, AK (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,130,946 -84,000 2,400,000 259,967 125,079 3,484,210 713,382 24,870 1,274,934 -80,000 4,682,515 478,403 4,641,037 7,540,000 12,692 38,880 4,165,949 1,605,522 2,781,128 -32-12- TABLE 32-A (Continued) ALASKA DISTRICT Table 32-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 12, 1996 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. COOK INLET NAVIGATION, AK Deepen the entrance channel to -30 feet. Enlarge and deepen the maneuvering basin to -29.0 feet with an area of 415 by 830 feet. Wave spending beach to +4 feet. Three offshore reefs each, 1,300 feet long, constructed to a depth of-12 feet. Wave energy channel 100 feet wide with bottom elevation of +2 feet. CHIGNIK HARBOR, AK Deepen the entrance channel to -30 feet. Enlarge and deepen the maneuvering basin to -29.0 feet with an area of 415 by 830 feet. Wave spending beach to +4 feet. Three offshore reefs each, 1,300 feet long, constructed to a depth of-12 feet. Wave energy channel 100 feet wide with bottom elevation of +2 feet. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above MLLW along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. FALSE PASS HARBOR, AK Dredging of the inner basin and the entrance channel to accommodate a fleet of 88 vessels in a 5.2 acre basin protected by two rubble-mound breakwaters, 1,300 feet and 600 feet in length. DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK Basin 5.2 acres with entrance channel both to a depth of-12 feet MLLW and protected by a rock jetty about 90 feet long off the northerly shore of Juneau Isle adjacent to the basin entrance. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. KAKE HARBOR, AK Provides for a 1,580 foot long west breakwater and a 900 foot long south breakwater enclosing a 7 acre berthing area at -15 feet MLLW. -32-13- Documents H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., Ist Sess.2 P.L. 94-587 Section 101(b)(2), Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1999. P.L. 105-245. P.L. 104-303, Water Resources Development Act of 1996. FY 1999 Congressional Add H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 House Report 106-1020, Section 101 (b)(1) (2), Water Resources Development Act of 2000, 106" Congress H. Doc. 286, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 P.L. 88-451 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 S. Doc. 249, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. Oct. 12, 1996 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 31, 2000 6. Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Table 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 10. Jul. 3, 1958 11. Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 16, 1948 Aug 17, 1999 12. Aug 17, 1999 13. Aug 17, 1999 14. Aug 17, 1999 15. Oct 31, 1992 METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters enclosing a 7.0 acre basin. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410 foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long.' Seawall New entrance to Nome Harbor; 2,986 feet long breakwater; 230 feet long causeway spur; 3,450 feet long entrance channel with depth to 22 feet; sediment traps and causeway bridge. OUZINKIE HARBOR, AK Adding approximately 300 ft of breakwater and dredging at the entrance channel of rock pinnacles. SAND POINT HARBOR, AK Construct a mooring basin adjacent and south of the existing harbor. It incorporates the southern breakwater and causeway to the city dock by extending the existing breakwater. SEWARD HARBOR, AK Provide more moorage space. Project would accommodate 339 additional vessels. SITKA HARBOR, AK Boat harbor consisting of 3 rubblemound breakwates. H.Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., Ist Sess.2 H.Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H.Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 Report of Chief of Engineers as amended, dated August 2, 1999. Section 302, P.L. 106-53 Water Resource Development Act of 1999, 106th Cong. Section 303, P.L. 106-53 Water Resource Development Act of 1999, 106th Cong. Section 101 (a) (3), P.L. 106-53 Water Resource Development Act of 1999, 106th Cong. Water Resources Development Act of 1992, H. Doe. 103-37, 103" Cong.,l" Sess. -32-14- ALASKA DISTRICT Table 32-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 16. Nov. 17, 1986 17. Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Aug 17, 1999 18. Oct. 31, 2000 18. Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug 17, 1999 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 19. 20. 21. Dec. 19, 1985 ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of 3 feet above mean lower low water to 18 feet below mean lower low water and dredging the entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower low water. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1,050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 below feet mean lower low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height of 18 above mean lower low water. Deepen the entrance channel to -30 feet. Enlarge and deepen the maneuvering basin to -29.0 feet with an area of 415 by 830 feet. Wave spending beach to +4 feet. Three offshore reefs each, 1,300 feet long, constructed to a depth of -12 feet. Wave energy channel 100 feet wide with bottom elevation of +2 feet. Added small boat harbor with entrance channel and maneuvering area to -20MLLW and appropriate wave protection features. UNALASKA HARBOR, AK Provide harbor protection by stub rubblemound and floating breakwaters. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of harbor. Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. Project for navigation, Heritage Harbor, AK BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8,500 feet of riverbank. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Provides for construction of a dam and floodway for the Chena River (17 miles east of Fairbanks) for a dam and reservoir on the Little Chena River, and for a 27 mile long levee system with interior drainage works on the north side of the Tanana River. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Install 1,600 feet of steel sheetpile bulkhead along the toe of the bluff from the Dillingham city cargo dock to Snag Point. Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Section 202, P.L. 99-662 Section 101(b)(3), P.L. 104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Section 302, P.L. 106-53 Water Resource Development Act of 1999, 106th Cong. House Report 106-1020, Section 101 (b)(1) (2), Water Resources Development Act of 2000, 106 Congress H.Doc. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., Ist Sess. H.Doc. 284, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. Section 101 (a) (3), P.L. 106-53 Water Resource Development Act of 1999, 106th Cong. Section 202, P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 90-483 Sec. 114 P.L. 99-190 -32-15- Documents - - - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Table 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized HOMER SPIT, AK Extension of an existing rubblemound revetment along an existing sheetpile wall to provide protection and nourishment along a 1400 foot portion of State highway. Documents Sec. 101, Water Resource Development Act of 1990, P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. P.L. 104-65, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1996 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4. Little Chena Dam deauthorized in 1991. -32-16- See Section in Text 22. Date Authorizing Act Nov. 28, 1990 Nov. 13,1995 -- ALASKA DISTRICT Project Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK' Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor, AK2 Cordova, AK Craig Harbor, AK Douglas Harbor, AK Dry Pass, AK Egegik River, AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel, AK Haines Harbor, AK 2 Homer Harbor, AK2 Hoonah Harbor, AK Humboldt Harbor, AK Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Kake Harbor, AK Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK Mekorykuk, AK Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Naknek River, AK Neva and Olga Straits, AK Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 Pelican Harbor, AK Petersburg Harbor, AK Port Alexander, AK Port Lions, AK2 Rocky Pass, AK St. Michael Canal, AK Seldovia Harbor, AK Sergius Whitestone, AK Seward Harbor, AK Sitka Harbor, AK Skagway Harbor, AK Stikine River, AK Valdez Harbor, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK 1. Abandonment recommended in H.Doc. 467, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3. In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5. In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed -32-17- TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS - - - For Last Cost to Sep. Full Report O See Annual Report for Construction Mail 1920 128,896 1983 2,000,0003 1985 1,520,272 1977 1,220,000 1978 843,534 1986 9,642,000 1983 1,033,5004 1963 282,019 1983 943,351 1972 4,441 1959 154,191 1964 789,461 1977 1,000,00 5 1987 2,000,000 1983 4,255,0006 1977 3,679,6837 1941 66,037 1974 1,381,150 1991 870,700 1975 109,848 1979 1,602,417 1973 1,891,2128 1986 1,372,139 1970 9,700 1961 20,789 1960 155,009 1972 370,415 1964 369,683 1972 252,932 1949 17,000 1986 1,825,311 1960 337,668 1916 377,062 1974 1,051,8839 1973 1,798,010 1973 712,36910 1973 1,611,009 1972 133,180 1987 1968 649,740" 1979 3,562,343 7. In addition, $857,000 of State funds. 8. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 11. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 30. 1994 Operation and ntenance 2,154 5,000 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 331,256 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 560 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,400 32,665 8,804 221,498 309,260 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1994 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0062 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, AK Completed 1973 260,681 Lowell Creek, AK4 Completed 1945 416,3825 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,77067 162,925' Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 1. Section 14. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 2. In addition, $25,000 expended fiom contributed funds. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. During FY88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 32-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Allison Lake, AK (Valdez Hydropower) 1992 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 Little Chena River Dam 1983 1990 Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK 1970 1991 9,700 Scammon Bay, AK 1992 Skagway River, AK 1966 1991 26,385 -32-18- ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 32-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs King Cove, AK 3,489,933 Larsen Bay, AK 2,125,229 Metlakatla, AK 36,813 Ouzinkie, AK 851,241 Tatitlek, AK 40,412 Ketchikan, AK 9,427 Haines, AK 61,260 Unalaska, AK 52,856 6,667,171 TOTAL TABLE 32-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Date Survey Conducted Cordova Harbor June 2000 Douglas Harbor May 2000 Dry Pass Channel May 2000 Haines Small Boat Harbor May 2000 Kodiak, Near Is. Channel and St. Herman's Harbor June 2000 Petersburg, North Harbor May 2000 Seldovia Harbor and Deep Draft Channel June 2000 Skagway Small Boat Harbor and Deep Draft Dock May 2000 Valdez Small Boat Harbor June 2000 -32-19- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 32-J STREAM BANK EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Emmonak, AK 66,947 Glacier Street, Whittier, AK 3,320 Noatak, AK 1,957 Barrow Landfill, AK 32,280 Barrow Public Facilities 10,300 Big Delta State Historical Park, AK 50,353 Levelock Public Facilities, AK 7,624 Port Graham Public Facilities, AK 2,904 TOTAL 175,685 TABLE 32-K ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Gold Creek Salmon Restoration, AK 41,175 -32-20- - -- LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT* This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of the entrance to the Los Angeles Harbor). The lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ) which is southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern comer; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. LA-LB Harbors (LA Harbor), CA 3. Marina Del Rey, CA 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA 7. Oceanside Harbor Sand Bypass, CA 8. Port Hueneme, CA 9. Port of Long Beach (Deepening), CA 10. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 11. San Diego Harbor, CA 12. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 13. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 14. Santa Monica Breakwater, CA 15. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 16. Ventura Harbor, CA Flood Control 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. Alamo Dam, AZ Clifton, AZ Hansen Dam, LACDA (Recreation Development), CA Lake Elsinore, CA Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA Los Angeles River (Recreation Development), CA Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA Nogales Wash, AZ Norco Bluffs, Santa Ana River, CA Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ Pine and Mathews Canyons Dam, Colorado RB, NV Rillito River, AZ Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA Santa Paula Creek, CA San Luis Rey River, CA Sepulveda Dam (Recreation Development), CA Sweetwater River, CA Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV Page 33-2 33-2 33-2 33-3 33-3 33-3 33-4 33-4 33-4 33-4 33-4 33-5 33-5 33-5 33-5 33-6 33-6 33-6 33-6 33-6 33-7 33-7 33-7 33-8 33-8 33-8 33-8 33-8 33-8 33-9 33-9 33-9 33-9 33-10 33-10 36. Tucson Diversion Channel (Recreation Development), AZ 37. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ 38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 40. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 41. Emergency Response Activities Program General Investigations 42. Surveys 43. Collection and Study of Basic Data 44. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 44A. Rio Salado, Phoenix Reach, AZ 44B. Rio Salado, Tempe Reach, AZ 44C. Tucson Drainage Area, AZ Tables Table 33-A Cost and Financial Statement Table 33-B Authorizing Legislation Table 33-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects Table 33-D Other Authorized Shore Protection (formerly Beach Erosion Control) Projects Table 33-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Table 33-G Deauthorized Projects Table-33-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Table-33-I Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects/ Flood Control Projects Table 33-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) 33-1 Page 33-10 33-10 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-13 33-17 33-27 33-28 33-29 33-31 33-32 33-33 33-34 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about a mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202.) Existing project. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1989. Operations during fiscal year. A six-year, three-cycle dredging contract was designed and awarded in FY2000. The contract covers FY2001 through FY2006. Mobilization and dredging activities began in September 2000 and continue into FY2001. Total O&M General obligations for FY2000 were $1,067,000. Project condition is good. 2. LOS ANGELES - LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California in San Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the city of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. Existing project. The project consists of four increments of dredging to be constructed in two stages - deepening the existing entrance channel for the Port of Los Angeles and providing new channels to existing and new port facilities. The dredge material will be used for fill to create Pier 400. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $401,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $115,200,000 is Federal ($114,900,000 Corps and $300,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $285,800,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The revised recommended project was changed due to the withdrawal of the Port of Long Beach on October 1, 1991. The Port of Los Angeles, the local sponsor, received credit, for advance work (Stage 1) performed per WRDA 1988. Project Cooperation Agreement executed March 18, 1997. Terminal Facilities. Of the 82,553 feet of wharves in the Los Angeles Harbor, 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interests. The final report presented and recommended four project increments. Increment No. 2 would deepen the existing Los Angeles Harbor approach and entrance channels to Pier 300 to provide better access to dry bulk facilities. Increment No. 3 would further deepen the Los Angeles approach and entrance channel to Pier 300 and part of Pier 400, and deepen a south channel to provide access to the eastern side of Pier 400 and liquid bulk facilities. Increments No. 4 and 5 would extend Increment No. 3 of Los Angeles to provide access to container terminals that would be located on part of Pier 300 and Pier 400. The material obtained from the dredging was used to create new landfill within the port and shallow water habitat for the least tern. Operations during fiscal year. An Assessment Report of the San Pedro Breakwater was initiated; completion is expected in FY2002. The Appropriations Committee provided an additional $900,000 for activities associated with maintenance dredging: 1) a Dredge Disposal Management Plan, 2) engineering and design on contract dredging of the East and West Basins and the Los Angeles River Estuary, 3) a hydrographic survey of the entire Federal project, and 4) the monitoring and study of Least terns at the Los Angeles River Estuary and vicinity. Total O&M General obligations were $630,000. Construction of Stage 2 was completed June 2000. Project condition is good. 3. MARINA DEL REY, CA Location. Marina del Rey is located on Santa Monica Bay, 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, 29 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. Existing project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing Federal navigation project consists of two jetties a breakwater and navigation channels. Contaminated materials, causing costly maintenance and a potential threat to navigation, complicate a severe shoaling problem in the harbor. Local cooperation. County of Los Angeles Department of Beaches and Harbors requested a new study, and expressed local support by letter dated August 5, 1992. Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement signed February 21, 1997. Terminal facilities. Marina del Rey is homeport to about 15 commercial fishing boats and 50 other transit boats with an annual fish catch valued at approximately $10 million. There are about ten charter boat and five tour boat operations used by over 100,000 people each year and over 6,000 berths servicing recreational craft 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT within the harbor. Eight yacht clubs call the marina homeport. The marina offers sailing instruction, boat rental, repair and storage, harbor tours, sport fishing, retail facilities, coffee shops, snack bars and fine restaurants. The U.S. Coast Guard has a cutter permanently assigned to the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. The Appropriations Committee included a Congressional Add of $3.5 million. This was combined with existing funds and Contributed Funds from the local sponsor to dredge the North and South Entrances and Main Channel. Contract dredging was completed in February 2000. Total O&M General obligations were $3,247,000. Project condition is good. 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay, 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387). Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement executed on April 7, 1995. Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department of Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by the city of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately-owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately-owned floating docks. Operations during the fiscal year. In FY2000, the Entrance, Transition, and Main Channels were dredged. Repairs to the South Breakwater were initiated and completed. A hydro survey was conducted September 2000. Total O&M General obligations were $3,402,000. Project condition is good. 5. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA Location. Forty miles southeast of Los Angeles. Existing project. Provides rubblemound entrance jetties, 920-foot deep and 500-foot wide entrance channel and main channel, inner channels, a turning basin, and anchorage areas. Upper Newport is a shallow 800-acre marine estuary. Navigation project is maintained by Corps of Engineers. Pursuant to Section 841 and subject to Section 903(b) of WRDA 1986, the project for navigation for the harbor is modified to dredge and maintain a 250-foot wide channel in Upper Newport Bay to the boundary of Upper Newport Bay State Ecological Preserve to a depth of 15 feet. Local cooperation. In a resolution dated August 20, 1996, Orange County Board of Supervisors indicated strong support of feasibility study and understanding of cost sharing requirements. Operations during fiscal year. A hydrographic survey of the harbor was conducted. Total O&M General obligations were $40,000. Project condition is adequate. 6. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of city of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Oceanside Small Harbor Craft District sent letter of support dated April 1985 and Letter of Intent in March 1989. Project Cooperation Agreement executed in January 1993. Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats, single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors' slips; 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a hotel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Navigation improvements include new dredging and biannual dredging of expanded entrance channel area. Operations during fiscal year. Annual contract maintenance dredging was performed. Total O&M General obligations were $1,155,000. Project condition is fair. 7. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BYPASS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California along Oceanside Beach near jetty, about 30 miles north of city of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. Underwater experimental pumping system with the pumps, fluidizers, and submerged pipeline to remove sand from harbor entrance and deposit it to down- 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 coast beaches, on a continual basis. Phase I and Phase II have both been completed and successfully tested. The experiment is complete and we have determined the bypass technology can be installed with a successful operation but, not at Oceanside. Local Cooperation. City of Oceanside officials are in full support of the closure of the experimental bypass project. Operations during fiscal year. Project close out completed. 8. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, about one mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the city of Port Hueneme, four miles southwest of the city of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the city of Ventura. Existing Project. Authorized in 1970 for restudy of completed project. The harbor serves both military and commercial uses with port facilities consisting of terminals, wharves, and warehouses serving a wide variety of products. The existing Federal project consists of an approach channel, entrance channel, central basin, and two rubblemound jetties. The Navy has plans to utilize the harbor more extensively for vessel berthing and repair; effectively reducing maneuverability in the harbor. Harbor District would like to use deeper draft wood pulp carrier vessels and possibly tankers. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. The Oxnard Harbor District reviewed and agreed to sign the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement on January 3, 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Repairs to the East and West Jetties were completed in September 2000. Total O&M General obligations were $1,411,000. Project condition is good. 9. PORT OF LONG BEACH (DEEPENING), CA Location. On the coast of southern California along the Pacific Coast in San Pedro Bay about 20 miles south of downtown Los Angeles. Existing Project. The recommended plan consists of deepening the approach channel to -76 MLLW, from breakwater seaward, a distance of about 2 miles to accommodate deep draft crude tankers. WRDA 1996 authorized project in accordance with the July 1996 Chief of Engineers Report. The estimated cost of the project 33-4 (October 1998) is $43,350,000. Local cooperation. The Port of Long Beach is the local sponsor. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in July 1998. Operation during the fiscal year. The base contract was awarded August 1998 to dredge -69 feet MLLW. Awarded option to base contract in July 1999 to dredge -72 feet MLLW. 10. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Location. On the coast of southern California on the southern portion of Santa Monica Bay, about 17 miles southwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. WRDA of 1986 (H.R. 6) Conference Bill, Title VIII - Project Modification, Section 809 - King Harbor, Redondo Beach, CA, modifies the King Harbor Project in order to carry out maintenance dredging and for breakwater construction, and authorized the Secretary to restore the breakwater to a height of 22 feet and maintain breakwater at such height to provide greater protection from heavy wave action. Local cooperation. City of Redondo Beach officials are in full support of the study and have indicated desire to construct improvements to reduce continued storm related damages. Operations during fiscal year. No operations or maintenance were performed. Project condition is good. 11. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California just north of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33 and 34 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consists of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. A hydrographic survey was conducted under Project Condition Surveys. Total O&M General obligations were $52,800. Project condition is good. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 12. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Location. The project is located at the mouth of the San Diego River about six miles northwest of the San Diego business district, San Diego County, California. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1991. Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944, the existing project consists of a levee channel, entrance channel, main channel, altered railroad bridge, anchorage basins (West Anchorage and Quivira) and three jetties. Construction of a 1,200-foot-long weir restored design conveyance capacity at the mouth of the San Diego River. A sand plug in mouth of river reduced flood-carrying capability from 115,000 cfs to 35,000 cfs, equal to a 100- year flood. The temporary timber pile breakwater at Quivira Basin was replaced with a permanent rubble mound breakwater. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed July 1996 with the city of San Diego. Operations during fiscal year. A hydrographic survey was conducted under Project Condition Surveys. Total O&M General obligations were $17,400. Project condition is fair. 13. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor. Existing project. For details on original, see page 33-4 Annual Report for 1983. For reevaluation details see WRDA, 1986. The recommended plan includes acquiring a permanent dredge for the city and they will assume the operation and maintenance of the channel. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969, for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. The city reaffirmed its support on February 8, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. Routine annual maintenance dredging (two-cycle) was performed. Total O&M General obligations were $1,087,000. Project condition is fair. 14. SANTA MONICA BREAKWATER, CA Location. Santa Monica Breakwater is located seaward of the Santa Monica Pier, approximately 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles. Existing breakwater is 2,000 feet long and lies 1,300 feet from the shoreline. Existing project. The project plan comprises reconstruction 33-5 of 900 feet of the southern end of the existing breakwater to an elevation of +10 feet MLLW for storm damage prevention and constructing an offshore boulder-field for fish habitat. The local sponsor will provide 12 moorings and other boating support facilities to reestablish commercial boating opportunities. WRDA 1996 authorized the project. The estimated cost of the project is $7,200,000 (Federal cost is $4,700,000 which includes $40,000 US Coast Guard; Non-Federal cost is $2,500,000). Local cooperation. City of Santa Monica, the local sponsor, indicated its support for the recommended plan and its willingness and intent to execute the Project Cooperation Agreement scheduled to be signed October 2000. Operations during fiscal year. Negotiate Project Cooperation Agreement. 15. SURFSIDE, SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH, CA Location. Project extends along Orange County coastline, 17 miles from San Gabriel River mouth down coast to Newport Bay Harbor entrance. Existing project. Authorization Section 101 of Rivers and Harbors Act 1962. Project is a periodic continuing construction project. Local cooperation. State of California, Orange County, Cities of Newport and Huntington Beach, and Surfside Colony. Letter of Intent dated August 11, 1995 from the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways, coordinating sponsor. Funding agreement with the State of California was executed on April 30, 1996. Operations during fiscal year. None. 16. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. Located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and six miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1981. Reevaluation under WRDA 1990 consists of modification to the existing harbor by constructing a separate South Beach groin, extending the offshore breakwater, adding a spur groin to the north jetty and detached breakwater, and deepening and extending the entrance channel and sand trap. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine annual maintenance dredging was performed. Total O&M General obligations were $2,484,000. Project condition is fair. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 parking lots, and landscaping. 17. ALAMO DAM, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, Arizona on the Bill Williams River, Arizona a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The Alamo Risk Assessment Study begun in FY98 was completed in FY2000. This study will provide information useful to the Alternate Spillway Study. Also, a Spillway Erodibility Study initiated in FY2000 will by completed in FY2001. Total O&M General obligations were $975,000. Project condition is good. 18. CLIFTON, AZ Location. Located on San Francisco River approximately 170 miles northeast of Tucson in Greenlee County, AZ. Existing project. The project consists of both structural and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates and floodwalls. Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 businesses, flood plain evacuation plans, and recreation development. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $24,100,000 (includes $2,600,000 cash contribution and $5,400,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The State of Arizona, Division of Emergency Services, is the local sponsor. Project Cooperation Agreement executed on July 30, 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of the levee and floodwall was completed August 1995 and turned over to sponsor December 1996. Completed non-structural relocation in December 1998. 19. HANSEN DAM, LACDA, (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), CA Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of Los Angeles about 20 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Recreation lake and facilities lie within flood control basin boundaries. Existing project. Original project authorized under Flood Control Act 1936, and modified by WRDA 1986, Section 847 Energy and Water Development Act 1992 (PL 102- 104). Project consists of two phases. Phase 1 is the excavation of the lake, and rough grading of the roadways and building pad locations. Phase 2 is the construction of a 10.5-acre recreation lake, picnic facilities, access roads, 33-6 Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with the city of Los Angeles. Operations during fiscal year. One-year plant monitoring program "walk-through" was held on Friday, December 29, 2000. Plant monitoring program is complete. Total O&M General obligations were $46,300. Project condition is good. 20. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the city of Corona. Existing project. The project consists of an earthentrapezoid outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30- foot to 80-foot base and IV on H. side slopes. The outlet channel will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level around the perimeter of the lake. The project included building six bridges and protecting an endangered species habitat. The project was completed in September 1993. Construction contract closed out September 1997. Amendment to Local Cooperation Agreement executed August 27, 1998. Confirmation of real estate credit initiated August 1998. Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District signed a Local Cooperation Agreement March 27, 1992. Amended August 27, 1998 to reflect Federal expenditures for the flood control project at $7,500,000. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated Section 205 study report addressing advisability of modifying the project for flood control. Confirmation of real estate credit initiated August 1998 and credit reimbursement was completed July 1999. 21. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Compton Creek, CA. Existing project. Project consists of channel improvement to lower Los Angeles, Rio Hondo Rivers, Compton Creek, and modification/replacement of as many as 27 bridges necessitated by the channel improvements. A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Estimated cost (October 1999) for existing project is $200,000,000 of which $150,000,000 is Federal and $50,000,000 is non-Federal (includes $43,968,000 cash contribution and $6,032,000 other costs). Flood Control LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. In February 1992, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, the local sponsor, affirmed its support and willingness to financially participate in the construction of the project at a level consistent with the current cost-sharing policy for construction. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed August 7, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. Periodic Inspections at Hansen, Lopez, & Sepulveda Dams and Haines Canyon Debris Basin were completed early in FY2001. The Whittier Narrows Seepage Control Measures Contract was awarded in FY2000 with the work completing in FY2001. A log boom design was completed for Hansen Dam. The estimated construction cost is &600,000. An Operations & Maintenance Efficiency Study was underway. Environmental consultants were contracted to produce the necessary documentation (i.e., Environmental Assessments) required to perform maintenance work in the soft-bottom flood control channels and within the reservoir areas behind each dam. Total O&M General obligations were $6,195,000. Project condition of Dams and Channels is good. 22. LOS ANGELES RIVER, SEPULVEDA TO ARROYO SECO, (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), CA Location. Upper Los Angeles River from Sepulveda Flood Control Basin (located 25 miles northwest of the city of Los Angeles) to the confluence of the Arroyo Seco channel, a distance of 20 miles. Existing project. The Upper Los Angeles River consists primarily of a rectangular channel from the Sepulveda Basin to a point approximately four miles above the Arroyo Seco as a trapezoidal channel of the Arroyo Seco. Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. U.S. Forest Service has informed the District of a lawsuit filed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act by the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity on behalf of the endangered Arroyo Toad. The lawsuit alleges the USFS is allowing "talking" of the endangered species. As a property owner the Corps may be implicated as well. Local agencies have indicated interest in operating and maintaining recreational development immediately upstream and downstream of the dam. This will help in control access. We have initiated informal Section 7 consultation and have implemented other physical restraints as well including fencing. Total O&M General obligations were $225,000. Project condition is good. 23. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA (MOJAVE RIVER RESERVOIR) Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. A periodic inspection was conducted and routine O&M activities were performed. Project condition is good. U.S. Forest Service has informed the District of a lawsuit filed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act by the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity on behalf of the endangered Arroyo Toad. The lawsuit alleges the USFS is allowing "taking" of the endangered species. As a property owner the Corps may be implicated as well. Local agencies have indicated interest in operating and maintaining recreational development immediately upstream and downstream of the dam. This will help in control access. 24. NOGALES WASH, AZ Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern Arizona in central and northern portions of the city of Nogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. Existing project. Current plan includes a flood warning system in Mexico and United States. Estimated cost (October 2000) for existing project is $560,000, $420,000 of which is Federal and $140,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement scheduled for execution in the last quarter of Fiscal Year 2001. Negotiating agreement with Mexico through U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission. Operations during fiscal year. Continue coordination with IBWC. No construction scheduled in Fiscal Year 2000. 25. NORCO BLUFFS, SANTA ANA RIVER, CA Location. Located approximately 40 miles southeast of Los Angeles, in the city of Norco, along a 3.75-mile stretch of the south bank of the Santa Ana River. Existing Project. The project consists of a structural solution of reverted-buttress fill using existing and imported fill material one reach, a distance of one mile. The bluff 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 stabilization protects a 65-foot-high bluff from further retreat into a residential neighborhood, which results when flood flows occur in the Santa Ana River. Estimated cost (October 1999) is $10,700,000 of which $8,025,000 is Federal and $2,675,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local sponsor, Riverside County Flood Control District. Project Cooperation Agreement executed in January 1999. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract awarded May 1999 and completed January 2000. 26. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. About 20 miles northwest of Gila Bend, and 120 miles southwest of Phoenix, Arizona. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. Total O&M General obligations were $759,000. Project condition is good. 27. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. Total O&M General obligations were $177,000. Project condition is good. 28. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Location. The project is located in Tucson metropolitan area of Pima County, AZ. Existing project. Plan of improvement includes: 1) an upstream equestrian staging area; 2) an upstream rest area; 3) a downstream rest area; 4) esthetic treatment planting; 5) construction of 16 pedestrian bridges; and 6) continue work on the Limited Reevaluation Report for Tanque Verde. Estimated cost (October 1998) for existing project is $40,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation 33-8 through the construction period), of which $28,600,000 is Federal and $11,400,000 is non-Federal. Flood control portion is $34,215,468 and recreation is $5,784,532. Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on February 24, 1986 and May 6, 1987. Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in June 1994. Amendment to PCA for third increment was executed on September 16, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. Phase III construction contract was awarded September 1998 and is scheduled for completion in Fiscal Year 2000. 29. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of ,Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Plan of improvement: Seven Oaks Dam, management of overflow area - Seven Oaks to Prado; raise Mill Creek Levee; additional storage at Prado; improvements along: Oak Street Drain/Riverside Co., Santiago Creek/Orange Co., San Timoteo Creek/San Bernardino Co., and Lower Santa Ana River; recreation development: mitigation and preservation. Estimated cost (October 2000) for existing project is for $1,365,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $924,000,000 is Federal and $441,000,000 is non-Federal ($73,429,000 cash contribution and $367,571,000 other cost). Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on December 14, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Continue engineering and design on the Lower Santa Ana River, Santiago Creek, Prado Dam and San Timoteo Reach 3B. Continue construction on Lower Santa Ana River, Reach 8. 30. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND ORANGE COUNTY, CA Location. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bemrnardino Counties, CA. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Orange County Water District advocated an increase in water conservation at Prado Dam up to elevation 505 feet. Prado Basin LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT includes significant riparian wetlands, including nesting areas of the endangered least Bell's vireo. The basin is currently under review as proposed critical habitat for the vireo. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. Environmental consultants were contracted to produce the necessary documentation (i.e. Environmental Assessments) required to perform maintenance work in the soft-bottom flood control channels and within the reservoir areas behind each dam. Total O&M General obligations were $2,837,000. Project condition of Dams and Channels is good. 31. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Location. Santa Paula Creek is a tributary of the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of the city of Santa Paula, Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and approximately 60 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Existing project. Authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611 (HD 443/80/1) and for details see Annual Report Fiscal Year 1991, page 33-10. Estimated cost (October 1999) for existing project is $37,700,000, of which $36,100,000 is Federal and $1,600,000 is non-Federal (includes $0 cash contribution and $1,600,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Ventura County Flood Control District. No authorization is required; therefore, the existing Section 221 Agreement is still binding and was amended in September 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Upstream channel contract awarded November 1998, scheduled to complete March 2001. 32. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the San Luis Rey River, in and around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone protected channel with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 reauthorized the project. Estimated cost (October 1998) $81,600,000 of which $61,100,000 is Federal and $20,500,000 is non- Federal (including $4,100,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Final Local Cooperation Agreement signed by city of Oceanside and Secretary of Army May 13, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract for relief wells completed January 2000. 33. SEPULVEDA DAM, (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), CA Location. The project is located between the communities of Encino and Van Nuys and 15 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Flood Control Act 1936 and Public Law 77-387 1941, and 1989-1972. Primary project purpose is flood control. Subsequent Act of Congress authorized a secondary project purpose for park and recreation. Local cooperation. The recreation project is 50/50 cost shared with the city of Los Angeles. Federal funds will complete Lake Balboa and park with comfort station, trails, fencing, irrigation, children=s play area and revegetation and develop an additional wildlife area. The city will continue reclaimed water distribution and develop several park areas. Operations during fiscal year. Project construction physically completed January 1999. 34. SWEETWATER RIVER, CA Location. The project empties into San Diego Bay in the city of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San Diego, and eight miles north of the Mexican Border. Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 and Interstate 5 construction; and construction of two railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and mitigation land. Local cooperation. San Diego County signed 221 Agreement in December 1984. Operations during fiscal year. None. 35. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Location. The project area is located west of and through urbanized Las Vegas community along both Tropicana and Flamingo Washes in southern Nevada. Existing project. The recommended plan will provide urban flood reduction, erosion control and wildlife enhancement for portions of Las Vegas and the surrounding areas to the west and southwest, including the rapidly 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 developing alluvial fan immediately west of Las Vegas. The plan recommends construction of two debris basins, four detention basins, modifications to two existing detention basins, 28 miles of channels connecting these project elements, 43 miles of lateral collectors, environmental mitigation, and recreation facilities. The estimated cost (October 2000) for the existing project is $291,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation), of which $214,800,000 is Federal and $76,200,000 is non-Federal (includes $32,500,000 cash contribution and $43,700,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District and the Department of Public Works are the local sponsors for flood control. The Clark County Recreation Department is the potential local sponsor for the recreation feature. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on February 7, 1995. The Section 211 PCA was executed December 17, 1999. Operations during fiscal year. Continued construction of Blue Diamond Dam, Lower Red Rock Channel, and Blue Diamond Beltway Channel, Segment 10A. Completed construction of Lower Blue Diamond Channel and Tropicana Outlet Channel. 36. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), AZ Location. The Tucson Detention Basin and Diversion Channel are located in southeast Arizona. The project area initiates within the basin and proceeds approximately five miles downstream until it meets Interstate 19. Existing project. The recreational development consists of a bicycle and hiking trail; four rest areas at the basin's inlet and outlet areas, near the intersection of Park Avenue and Ajo Way, across the street from Wakefield Middle School and near Interstate 19, where the project ends; four channel under crossing areas at Ajo Way (near the basin's outlet), Interstate 10; Kino Parkway; and Benson Highway; a restroom facility and five to seven car parking area located near the end of the project area; lighting at rest areas; benches; pedestrian bridges; and landscaping. The flood control channel maintains a 30-40 foot width, with a average 30-foot right-of-way on each side of the channel. The trail system is primarily located along the north bank of the channel. Local cooperation. Pima County is the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of abovementioned features completed September 1998. 37. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. Fifty miles southeast of Phoenix, AZ in Pinal County, on Queen Creek, Arizona a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, Arizona. Existing project. For details see page 33-10 of Annual Report 1981. Project element earthfill Dam, circular conduit outlet works and reservoir. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. The Spillway Erodibility Study begun in FY99 was completed in FY2000. Findings: "The entire spillway is generally erodible, however, the duration of the expected maximum flow event is so short that a sill breach probably would not occur." Total O&M General obligations were $130,000. Project condition is good. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of 24 completed local flood control projects consisting of the following: 375 miles of channels, six dams, and appurtenances, and 23 debris basins. Total O&M General obligations were $775,000. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Section VII, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued. The flood control structures were Hoover, Twitchell, and Tat Momolikot Dams. Total O&M General obligations were $177,000. 40. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended: Federal cost for Section 205 was $518,307 of which $505,624 was used for studies and $12,683 for Coordination Account. See Table 33-i for list of projects. Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended Federal cost for Section 14 was $52,083. Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in interest of Flood Control, Section 208, 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Congress. Federal cost for Section 14 was $0. Modifications to Structures and Operations of Constructed Corps Projects to Improve the Quality of the Environment, Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as amended. Federal cost for Section 1135 was $1,495,476. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to Section 206 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Federal cost for Section 206 was $382,841 of which $15,792 was Coordination Account and $367,049 was Preliminary Restoration Plans. 41. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES - FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Emergency Flood Control Activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). A. Disaster: This program encompasses all the activities associated with preparedness, which includes preparation of plans and policy documents, exercises, training, coordination with outside agencies and governments, maintaining supplies and equipment, and the like. The district developed and published an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Standard Operating Procedures, which codified the many procedures and processes attendant to EOC operations. The district also compiled the information for revisions to its Flood Response and Earthquake Response Plans. B. Operational Program Areas: Fiscal Year cost for disaster preparedness was $566,385; emergency operations cost was $3,934; repair and restoration of damaged Federal flood control works cost was $2,802,776 and $156,532 for non-Federal flood control works; inspection of non-Federal flood control works cost was $42,019. C. Emergency Work in Support of Other Federal Agencies. Support work was performed for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) following hurricanes George and Dennis and the Oklahoma tornado at a cost of $576,188. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Total Fiscal Year costs were $8,629,880 of which $1,038,575 was for navigation studies; $1,922,775 was for flood damage prevention studies; $392,938 was for shoreline protection studies; $3,524,797 was for special studies; $328 for review of completed projects; $864,968 was for Miscellaneous Activities (includes $86,476 for special investigations; $0 for FERC licensing activities; $31,943 for Interagency Water Resources Development; $2,876 for National Estuary Studies; $0 for North American Waterfowl Management Plan); and $62,023 for Coordination Studies with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests, ($33,896 was for Planning Assistance to States - $12,198 for Arizona, and $21,698 for California). 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal Year costs totaling $325,900 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, FPMS Unit $55,163; Technical Services $62,538; Quick Responses $9,933; and Special Studies $179,032 and $19,234 for hydrologic studies. 44. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal Year expenditures were $2,335,813 of which $866,971 was for projects not yet authorized for construction and $1,468,842 were for projects fully authorized. 44A. RIO SALADO, PHOENIX REACH, AZ Location. The project area is located in the city of Phoenix, Arizona, along 7 miles of the Salt River. Existing project. Two sites have been identified with a Federal interest in environmental restoration involving riparian habitat restoration, water quality improvement and recreation that are incidental or complimentary to the primary project purpose. The first site is 1.5 miles on Indian Bend Wash, from McKellips Road downstream to the confluence with the Salt River in Tempe; the second site is located along 7 miles of the Salt River, from the Interstate Highway 10 Bridge to 19th Avenue in Phoenix. Local cooperation. The city of Phoenix and the Corps of Engineers executed the Preconstruction Engineering Design Agreement on July 31, 1998. Operations during fiscal year. The preconstruction engineering and design phase was completed in September 2000. 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 44B. RIO SALADO, TEMPE REACH, AZ Location. The project area is located along 1.5 miles on Indian Bend Wash, from McKellips Road downstream to confluence with Salt River in Tempe, Arizona. Existing project. There is a Federal interest in environmental restoration involving riparian habitat restoration, water quality improvement and recreation that are incidental or complimentary to the primary project purpose. Local cooperation. The city of Tempe and the Corps of Engineers executed the Design Agreement February 25, 1999. Operations during fiscal year. The preconstruction engineering and design phase was completed in September 2000. 44C. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, AZ Location. Located along Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico Watershed, within the Tucson city limits in Arizona. Existing project. Both the reconnaissance report and the feasibility study identified the Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico watershed area (approximately 11.4 square miles) as the major drainage channel within downtown Tucson. The recommended plan has two main features consisting of two detention basin complexes - one on Arroyo Chico in the headwaters of the drainage area (referred to as Randolph Golf Course Detention Basin Complex), and one on Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico in the approximate center of the watershed (referred to as Park Avenue Detention Basin Complex). The local sponsor completed the Randolph Golf Course Detention Basin Complex in May 1996 using Section 104 credit consideration. Local cooperation. Pima County Flood Control District and the Corps of Engineers executed the Design Agreement on May 3, 1999. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design phase was initiated in May 1999. 33-12 TABLE 33-A LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Channel Islands, CA Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor, CA Model Study: Marina del Rey, CA Morro Bay Harbor, CA Newport Bay Harbor, CA Oceanside Harbor, CA Oceanside Harbor Sand By-Pass, CA Port Hueneme, CA Port of Long Beach, CA Redondo Beach (King Harbor) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,699,000 2,836,000 1,650,614 2,705,897 15,000,000 34,975,000 14,858,465 34,621,306 1,569,000 1,664,000 1,104,714 1,690,138 162,000 162,000 136,734 177,125 -30,000 1,081,000 -44,286 1,065,448 0 0 9,052 25,539 970,000 3,437,000 973,031 3,361,325 1,654,000 605,000 1,654,991 332,009 -62 0 -62 0 531,000 1,014,000 400,307 1,138,823 0 -1,400,000 766,469 1,343,660 0 0 0 0 244,000 4,135,000 245,149 583,170 0 200,000 0 101,201 33-13 Total Cost 30 Sep 00 2,761,065 2,795,900 57,000,000 57,039,881 1,264,000 1,777,478 147,000 157,751 2,882,033 2,863,614 0 0 1,002,000 1,034,465 1,554,000 1,818,904 0 0 692,000 689,545 0 228,385 152,935 160,570 8,279,000 4,941,257 938,000 1,026,039 1,060,000 1,064,207 -13,000 405,352 620,000 662,713 160,000 158,367 3,193,000 3,254,931 0 0 3,383,000 3,434,179 39,000 39,200 0 0 1,140,000 1,155,433 134,000 203,139 1,422,000 1,410,006 -1,047,000 5,858,648 -4,000 6,111 46,631,185 46,626,015 111,402,000" 111,329,738 15,593,842 15,588,148 9,708,887 9,707,213 17,425,807 17,425,578 1,524,000 1,474,261 25,989,471 25,985,023 4,562,700 4,554,349 3,734,9382 284,938 14,724,787 14,722,465 23,490,900 23,490,724 3,056,100 3,043,110 12,117,000 12,080,808 6,369,343 6,368,646 10. __ - --- ~ - -- - -- ~e I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-A Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 11. San Diego Harbor, CA 12. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 142,000 139,732 -400,000 913,897 37,000 30,482 0 14,014 0 7,975 0 14,272 0 5,507,191 2,355 5,502,091 0 7,884,345 424 7,877,905 13. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 14. Santa Monica Breakwater, CA 15. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 16. Ventura Harbor (Ventura Marina), CA 17. Alamo Dam, AZ 18. Clifton, AZ 19. Hansen Dam, LACDA, CA (Recreation) 20. Lake Elsinore, CA 21. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA 22. Los Angeles River, Sepulveda Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. 19,000 16,820 1,318,000 1,239,512 10,000 19,316 0 5,521 5,804,000 5,505,594 0 -6,633 2,095,000 1,973,632 1,328,000 857,414 604,000 651,722 0 33,000 3,613,689 0 36,142 3,613,688 1,235,000 1,550,967 1,083,000 1,160,838 1,719,917 1,087,088 0 1,860 1,409,000 19,503 0 184,886 7,000 0 0 7,665 -1,099,000 90,791 10,000 4,766 -135,000 21,536 410,000 404,113 400,000' 356,829 0 292,000 21,701,100 65,407 242,918 21,572,629 -787 12,846 0 5,286,213 0 5,286,213 6,391,000 3,126,000 2,471,000 44,389,332 5,729,589 3,978,788 2,488,326 44,687,277 974,000 1,389,276 2, 160,000 824,611 0 982,000 0 330,598 (500,000) 0 936,000 958,000 18,605,859 1,014,326 990,791 18,580,061 -105,000 370,000 14,325,0004 966,059 593,506 14,278,921 0 1,541,652 68,000 2,432,000 59,026 2,439,039 0 6,457,000 121,150 6,425,025 0 7,500,000 1,935 7,500,000 14,424,800 16,941,000 50,744,000 35,475,300 168,250,600' 14,392,147 16,246,471 50,625,406 33,273,990 163,311,959 5,612,000 7,219,500 4,727,500 6,176,000 103,180,702 4,791,637 6,817,931 6,410,108 6,277,137 103,200,316 400,000 33-14 See Section In Text FY 00 Total Cost 30 Sep 00 - ---- -- - - -- -- TABLE 33-A LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 to Arroyo Seco, CA (Recreation) 23. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 24. Nogales Wash, AZ 25. Norco Bluffs, CA 26. Painted Rock, AZ (Gila River) 27. Pine & Mathews Canyons Dam, Colorado River 28. Rillito River, AZ 29. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 30. Santa Ana River Basin OC, CA 31. Santa Paula Creek, CA 32. San Luis Rey River, CA 33. Sepulveda Dam, CA, (Recreation) 34. Sweetwater River Basin, CA 35. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV 36. Tucson Diversion Channel, AZ (Recreation) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 28,835 181,000 189,578 -66,800 42,509 180,000 78,176 1,494,000 913,109 106,000 111,531 6,000 1,004,659 65,346,000 64,794,41 1 2,461,000 2,287,217 1,923,000 1,802,238 -1,000,000 354,927 1,961,000 1,319,802 -100,000 -73,499 9,709,061 9,531,822 0 396,738 191,000 187,992 214,000 72,279 1,000,000 101,739 2,063,000 1,547,326 92,000 91,424 757,000 587,266 70,916,000 66,607,143 3,067,000 2,802,171 4,457,000 4,379,650 2,371,000 2,348,438 0 840,797 0 22,330 i7,783,000 14,578,276 0 1,745,123 33-15 Total Cost 30 Sep 00 28,751 182,000 188,341 0 83,199 4,400,000 2,152,527 1,102,000 2,205,677 228,000 221,974 2,600,00 1,622,868 37,507,000 39,429,995 3,716,000 4,105,912 8,519,000 5,689,913 220,000 579,000 -700,000 1,359,424 0 20 15,987,000 14,977,745 0 97,082 4,674 213,000 221,164 0 15,142 2,404,000 4,826,561 749,000 835,873 169,000 178,607 2,090,000 3,261,442 37,787,700 40,442,313 2,795,000 2,890,071 7,745,000 9,938,532 1,850,000 2,000, 129 40,000 267,035 0 0 28,110,000 30,756,251 0 5,199 398,855 6,198,536 6,193,210 592,200" 547,436 7,984,000 7,159,003 27,991,183 27,973,523 2,908,329 2,905,716 27,647,0002' 27,540,159 665,654,700 649,698,346 53,659,494 53,162,766 32,350,020 31,073,372 59, 141,000 58,718,762 16,800,940 16,708,257 37,082,503 37,081,583 90,908,000ly 89,028,780 3,050,000 3,047,641 - -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-A Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 37. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ Maint: Approp. Cost 65,000 63,606 135,000 120,083 138,000 128,000 154,096 129,412 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 44A Rio Salado, Phoenix Reach, AZ 44B Rio Salado, Tempe Reach, AZ 44C Tucson Drainage Area, AZ FOOTNOTES: New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 0 330,000 1,725,000 1,320,000 0 221,962 1,474,974 1,631,079 00 30,000 0 49,000 28,221 20,000 30,264 21,590 225,000 308,000 139,954 233,481 130,000 319,000 415,312 3,375,000 3,328,015 582,000 401,656 499,000 467,166 1/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation of $4,090,000 and cost of $3,833,223. 2/ Excludes non-Federal sponsors funds $1,913,000 and cost of $1,685,758; includes PED Work Allowance of $647,000 and cost of $647,000. 3/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation of $750,000 and costs of $739,000. 4/ Excludes non-Federal funds $376,000 and cost of $367,712; includes PED appropriation $1,600,000 and cost of $1,600,000. 5/ Includes PED Work Allowance of $9,650,000 and cost of $9,648,146. Excludes non-Federal Work Allowance of $6,191,000 and cost of $4,299,586. 6/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs. Excludes PED appropriation and cost due to portions of the project reclassified to "Deferred" and Ainactive" categories. 7/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation $3,825,000 and cost of $3,825,000 8/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation $25,643,000 and costs of $25,643,000. 9/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation $225,000 and costs of $224,756. 10/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation $180,000 and costs of $78,176. 11/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation of S 7,174,000 and costs of $7,174,000 33-16 See Section In Text FY 00 Total Cost 30 Sep 00 2,086,850 2,085,276 -- - LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep 3,1954 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA June 3, 1988 A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. June 25,1896 Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 1 1,152 feet from Point Fermin. July 25, 1912 Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. Aug. 8, 1917 For silt-diversion works. Sep. 22, 1922 Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Mar 3, 1925 Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. July 3, 1930 A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-bfoot wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer Aug 30, 1935 harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-fobot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth Oct 17, 1940 entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubble mound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. H-.Doc.362,83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 18, 55th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.9, 64th Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 1013, 661th Cong.,3d sess. H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 130, 71st Con.,2d sess. S.Committee print, 74th Cong., Ist sess. l1.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess 33-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep 3, 1954 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefore and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. July 14, 1960 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. Oct 22, 1976 Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feelton g; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 f'et deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, friom 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pier head lines, wharves, or other structures. Oct 17, 1986 Deepen the entry channel to the Los Angeles Harbor and Long Beach Harbor to 70 feet and 76 feet respectively, including the creation of 800 acres of land from the project. Nov 17, 1988 If non-Federal interest carry out any work associated with such project which is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit such non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, without interest. Nov 28, 1990 Section 4(d) of WRDA 1988 (102 Stat. 4015) is amended by inserting after "approved by the Secretary" in the first sentence the following: "or which is carried out after approval of the final report by the Secretary and which is determined by the Secretary to be compatible with the project". Sep 25, 1996 The sewer outfall relocated by the Port of Los Angeles at a cost of approximately $12,000,000 shalble considered tob e a relocation. The cost of such relocation shalble credited as a payment provided by the non-Federal interest. IH.D oc. 161, 83d Cong., Ist Sess HI.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 86, Sec 201. WRDA 88, Sec 4 WRDA 90, Sec 102 WRDA 96 Sec 307 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Sep 3, 1954 Harbor for light-draft vessels. Sep 28, 1994 Determine advisable modifications in interest of navigation, hurricane and storm damage reduction, environmental restoration and disposal of' contaminated sediments from the entrance channel at Marina Del Rey Harbor MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Mar 2, 1945 Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. May 22, 1991 NEWPORT BAY HARBOR (& REVIEW), CA Maintenance and improvement of main and inner channels. Initiate feasibility phase studies re-environmental preservation benefits associated with modification of existing Federal project to extend channels into the Upper Newport Bay. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation teatures of Del Mar Boat Basin and Oct 27, 1965 of Oceanside Harbor. Navigation and storm damage reduction, repair, operate, and maintain Oct 27, 1990 the extension of south jetty. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BY-PASS SYSTEM, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar boat Basin and of May 22, 1991 Oceanside Harbor. PORT HUIENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels; Aug 13, 1968 dredged central basin to 35 feet deep, and extend southern-most interior channel. PORT OF LONG BEACH, CA Navigation project. Sep 25, 1996 The project for navigation, Port of Long Beach (Deepening), CA; Report of the chief of Engineers, dated July 26, 1996, at a total cost of $37,288,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $14,318,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $22,970,000. H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. Sec 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, supp. by House Resolution Sep. 28, 1994. 11.Doc.283, 77th Cong., Ist sess. Doc.PL99-662 (WRDA 1986, Sec841). R&H Acts 1937 & 1945 S. Doc. 138 78th Cong. WRDA 1986, Sec. 841 (PL-9962) H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., Ist sess. PL 101-640 (WRDA 1990) WRDA 1992. PL 102-580 EWDA Act 1992 H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 1996, Sec 101(d) 4. 33-19 3. 7. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Maintain harbor dredging and breakwaters. Construct and maintain breakwater to height of 22 feet. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. R&H Act 1950 (H.Doc 303 81st Cong.) PL99-662 (WRDA 86, Sec 809), Amended in WRDA 1988. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Annual Report. 1873; p.1-142 Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. H.Ex.Doc.177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p.21 14). Oct 17, 1986 Oct 1988 Mar 3, 1875 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 4, 1913 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 8, 1917 Aug 8, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 3, 1925 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Oct 17, 1940 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 13, 1968 H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., Ist session. H.Doc. 1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 1i 40, 65th Cong., Is t Sess. l .Doc. 1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 68th Cong., Ist sess. S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. IH.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.365, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 1 33-20 10. II. Mar 21, 1950 Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier I by dredging an portion of area F (north of area C). Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista. Widea bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and 0. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35-foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project lor San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefore; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Project for navigation; report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 26, 1994 Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. Complete plans and specifications. SANTA MONICA BREAKWATER, CA Ilurricane and storm damage reduction act. The project bfohr urTicane and storm damage reduction, Santa Monica Breakwater, Santa Monica, CA; Report of the chief of Engineers, dated June 7, 1996, at a total cost of $6,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,220,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $2,220,000. SURFSIDE, SUNSET & NEWPORT BEACH, CA Beach erosion. Protective measures that comprise a protective and feeder beach at Surfside, and on offshore breakwater at Newport Beach to provide and impounding area from which sand would be dredged and returned periodically to the feeder beach, all substantially in accordance with the plan of the DE. VENTURA HARBOR (VENTURA MARINA), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lieu of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. The Harbor commonly known as Ventura Marina, located in Ventura County, CA, and adopted and authorized by section 101 of Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known and designated as "Ventura Harbor". H.Doc.760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. I S.Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc.348, 77th Cong., Ist sess. Il Doc.518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None. Sec 101, H Doc 1160, Water Resources Project Authorization. WRDA 1996, Sec 101(d)7. Sec 101 of R&H Act 1992. H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 100-676. 33-21 12. Jul 24, 1946 13. Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Oct 23, 1962 Dec 31, 1970 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 14. 15. Oct 23, 1962 16. Aug 13, 1968 Nov 17, 1988 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17. 18. H.Doc.625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 1996 Sec 301. WRDA 1990, Sec 101(3a) modified WRDA 1986. PL 102-377 Energy & Water Appropriation Act, 1993. Sec 205, 1948 Flood Control Act (I). None None H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Jan 3, 1996 Sep 25, 1990 Oct 2, 1992 Feb 24, 1948 Jun 22, 1936 May 15, 1992 Jun 28, 1936 33-22 ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. CLIFTON, AZ Reauthorized the flood control project at a total cost of $21,100,000. Flood control. HANSEN DAM, CA Develop water conservation on existing spreading grounds. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Flood Control in downtown area as well as around perimeter of lake. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant Additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000). Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million bor prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River Downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 For further prosecution of comprehensive plan. 19. 20. 21. None None None None None None None None Aug 18, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Jul3 ,1 958 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 23, 1962 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec 30, 1963 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1988 None None None Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized modifications of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. The Secretary may convey to the city of South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 acres of real property, together with improvements thereon, located within the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. The project for flood control, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Califobmia, at a total cost of $327,000,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $163,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $163,500,000, is authorized to be prosecuted by the Secretary in accordance with a final report of the Chief of Engineers and with such modifications as are recommended by the Secretary. No construction on the project may be initiated until such a report of the Chief of Engineers is issued and approved by the Secretary. Authorized project for flood control. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Report. LOS ANGELES RIVER (SEPULVEDA DAM TO ARROYO SECO), CA Recreation development for bicycle/hiking trails along the upper Los Angeles River MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. Evaluate opportunities for water conservation, environmental restoration, and enhanced flood control, along the Mojave River and Tributaries downstream of the darn. NOGALES WASH, AZ Flood Control Protection and Flood Warning System. Flood warning gauges in Mexico Modifies Section 101(a)(4) of WRDA 1990 to direct the Secretary to permit the non-Federal contribution fbr the project to be determined in accordance with section 103 of WRDA 1986 and direct the Secretary to enter into negotiations with non-Federal interests pursuant to 103(1) of such Act concerning the timing of the initial payment of the non-Federal contributions. Conduct a study of the relationship of flooding in Nogales and floodlows emanating in Mexico. Transmit a report which includes a recommendation of the appropriate level of non- Federal participation in the authorized flood control project. NORCO BLUFFS, CA The project for bluff stabilization, Norco Blutffs, Riverside county, California, at a total cost of $8,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,450,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,150,000. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 33-23 WRDA 1990, Sec Ol0(b)(PL 101-640), Project Subject to Favorable Report of the chief of Engineers. P L 101-640, W R DA 1990 Flood Control Act 1936, PL 77387 1941, PL 103-126 Ii.Doc.164, 86th Cong., Ist sess. HR 2479, Mar. 7, 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriation bill 1990, H .Doc2696, 10lst Cong, Ist session WRDA 1990, Sec 101 (a)(4) WRDA 1996, Sec 303, Public Law 104-303 WRDA 1996, Sec 404; Public Law 104-303 WRDA 96, Sec 101(b) Oct 30, 1990 Nov 28, 1990 22. Jul 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 23. 24. Jun 20, 1989 Oct 27, 1990 Oct 12, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 25. 26. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct 17, 1986 Sep 26, 1997 31. May 20, 1991 Nov 28, 1990 Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. Cover Arizona canal Diversion channel, east of Central Avenue of Phoenix, property line of Arizona Biltmore on Phoenix, and east of 32d Street to the Cudia City Wash spillway in Paradise Valley. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. RIO SALADO (SALT RIVER), PHOENIX AND TEMPE, AZ Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Aug 20, 1998, at a total cost of $88,048,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $56,355,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of $31,693,000. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Flood damage protection. Bank erosions control and flood protection. Section 114 of Public Law 101-101, Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990, is amended by striking Atotal cost of'$ 19,000,000" and inserting in lieu thereof, Atotal cost of $40,000,000. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA Flood control along 75 miles reach of Santa Ana River, recreation development, and mitigation and preservation. The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Santiago Creek, CA, is modified to authorize the Secretary to develop recreational trails and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, including flood plain management areas. 27. 33-24 July 6, 1949 Oct 27, 1965 H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., Ist sess I1.Doc.216, 89th Cong., Ist sess National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 1992 and 1993. H.Doc.530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 1999, PL106-53 Section 101(a) (4) Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act 1990 WRDA 1986, PL99-662, Sec 601(a). Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1988 WRDA 1986, PL 99-662, Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act 1988, and WRDA 1988. H.Doc 94-594,94th Cong., 2d sess. 28. 29. May 17, 1950 Aug 17, 1999 30. June 20, 1989 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 32. Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 3, 1958 33. 34. Oct 22, 1976 Dec 17, 1970 Sep 25, 1996 35. Oct 22, 1976 36. Jun 11, 1964 SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related pulposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-ofway. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States. $3,500,000). Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bemardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million fbr prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Flood control improvements and prevention. Authorize for flood control. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. The project for flood control of the San Luis Rey river, CA, authorized pursuant to section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5; 79 stat 1073-1074) is modified to authorize the secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of the corps of Engineers dated may 23, 1996 at a total cost of $81,600,000 (Fed $61,100,000, non-Fed $20,500,000) SEPULVEDA DAM, CA RECREATION FACILITIES SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. H. Doc. 688, 75th cong., 3d sess. I1.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 3d sess None. H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. I None. 1948 Flood Control Act, H.Doc.443,80th Cong., Ist sess S.Doc.91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess Title III Project Related Provisions Sec 301 Project Modifications FC Act 1936, (Amended 1937, 1941, 1950) and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 IC Act 1965,H.Doc. 240 and 309, 88th Cong., 2d sess 33-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 37. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Flood reduction, erosion control, and wildlife enhancement. Authorizes project to demonstrate the potential advantages and effectiveness of non-Federal implementation of flood control projects, and provides that the Secretary shall enter into an agreement, pursuant to Section 211 of WRDA 96, with the non- Federal interests for development of that project. Proposed agreement would allow the non-Federal sponsor to construct any discrete segment of the authorized project as approved by the Army corps of Engineers. An Federal costs associated with the project, incurred by the non- Federal interest to accelerate for modify construction of the project, in cooperation with the Corps of Engineers, shall be eligible to reimbursement by the Secretary. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT), AZ The project for recreational development along the Tucson Diversion channel. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, AZ Report of the Chief of Engineers Report dated May 20, 1998, at a total cost of $29,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $16,768,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,132,000. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basins. I. Contains latest published map. 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. 3. Final date of approval by House of Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of Section 201, Public Law 89-298. 33-26 WRDA 1992, Sec 101 (13) WRDA 1996, Sec 211 (f)(5), Public Law 104-303 WRDA 1999, Sec 370; Public Law 106-53 FC Act 1936 (Amended 1937) 1941, 1950 and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. WRDA 1999, PL l06-53 Sec 101(a) (5) H.Doc.220, 80th Cong., Ist sess. Oct 31, 1992 Sep 25, 1996 Aug 17, 1999 38. Oct 22, 1976 39 Aug 17, 1999 40. Jul 24, 1946 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Dana Point, Harbor, CA Completed 1984 $ 4,737,550' 555,147' Harbor office at Monro Bay, CA3 Los Angeles and Long Beach Active 53,627,729 13,147,957 HIarbors, San Pedro Bay, CA3 Newport Bay Harbor, CA3 Inactive and 1982 796,897 2,696,245' Active (mod) Port San Luis, CA Completed and 1984 1,426,0506 1,042,352' Active (mod) Redondo Beach -larbor Completed and 1984 4,766,898' 5,237,313'0 (King Harbor), CA' Active (mod) Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA' 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. Includes $45,147 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. Includes $137,622 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since Fiscal Year 1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed iunds. Includes $568,417 tfor new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $104,031 expended in Fiscal Year 1987. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965, River and Harbor Act, and $18,958 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Includes $90,130 expended in Fiscal Year 1987. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since Fiscal Year 1958. Includes $293,167 expended in Fiscal Year 1987. 33-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange Completed 1967 $ 89,119 County, CA' Bird Rock Area, La Jolla Completed 1967 25,881l San Diego County, CA2 Coast of California, Point Mugu, Completed 1972 1,253,5944 to San Pedro Breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny Completed 1968 578,717' State Beach), CA Imperial Beach, CA Active 1986 2,875,4726 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA7 Completed 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,442' San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,000' San Gabriel River to Newport Bay Active 1985 9,722,100'0 (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Surfside-Sunset-Newport, CA (Stage I ) Active 1997 292,000 Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 71 5,819" and Deferred (part) 1I The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, IH.Doc.602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes 475,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Excludes $919,437 required contributed funds; $66,124 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 7. Plant in service. 8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 10. Excludes $4,626,638 for required contributed funds. Includes $10,772 expended in Fiscal Year 1987. I1. Excludes $1117,406 other contributed funds for beach-nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-28 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ' City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA' Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Indian Bend Wash Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes dam site (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson Diversion Channel Goleta, CA, and Vicinity Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County 7 Drainage Area, CA (mod) Holbrook levee Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Little Colorado River at Holbrook 7 Needles, San Bernardino Co. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ Oceanside Harbor, CA Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA' Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Gila River) Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino Co. CA Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA' San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees Riverside levees San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA Completed Completed Active Active Deferred Active (part) and Deferred (part) Completed Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Terminated Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Complcted Active 33-29 1984 1988 1989 1963 1966 1985 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1950 1996 1973 1989 1989 1970 S 3,000,0002 400,0002 12,510,000 56,300,000 73,201 " 31,809,294' 2,413,051 402,867 121,5094 10,218,900 6,922,6336 500,000 335,000 1,000,0001 I 1,100,000 5,100,000 i,000,0009 212,745 1973 1972 1962 1961 1959 1985 1961 1984 1983 195,194 982,432"' 7,753,937" 617,89012 2,104,478 9,258,207' 3 2, 126,672 10,079,927' 4 4,790,173"5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura Completed County, CA' South Fork of the Santa Clara Active River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA' Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Completed Vista, CA' Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed Ventura Harbor, CA Active Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and Completed channel Ventura River levee Completed Whitewater River, CA: Banning Levee-San Gorgonio Completed River, Riverside County' Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Completed Springs' Tahchevah Creek detention basin Completed and channel improvements Tahquitz Creek Inactive Winslow (tributaries of Little Completed Colorado River), Little Colorado and Deferre River Basin, AZ 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 4. Advance planning only. 5. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and $3,130,762 other contributed tiunds. Includes $31,071 expanded 6. Includes $1,158,006 Code 710 funds since Fiscal Year 1977. Excludes $749,058 required contributed funds and $394,364 funds. 7. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 8. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and $91,160 other contributed funds. I 9. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $176,295 other contributed funds. 10. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 other contributed funds. 22. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. (part) ad (part) 1984 1985 1985 1979 1990 1964 1950 1966 1973 1967 1974 1973 4,000,0001' 632,158 844,73217 1,703,03118 6,455,000 939,908'9 1,349,63820 97,868 819,87821 1,420,55222 1,063,600 1,831,300 11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 13. Excludes $712,000 other contributed tiunds. 14. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. Includes $74 expended in Fiscal Year 1987. 15. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items for required and $49,458 16. Excludes $559,525 required contributed other funds. 17. Includes $3,846 expended in Fiscal Year 1987. Excludes $104,941 other contributed funds. 18. International Boundary & Water Commission funds 9. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 20. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since Fiscal Year 1977. Excludes $17,006 other contributed funds. 21. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds; $53,470 other contributed funds. 33-30 TABLE 33-E LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: 1958 1964 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93,251 295,191 Aliso Creek Dam, CA San Juan Dam, CA Trabuco Dam, CA Villa Park Dam, CA Sierra Madre Wash Channel Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA Lower Mission Creek Santa Barbara, CA San Diego River Mission Valley, CA University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA 1950 1986 Sec. 1002 Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 1988 1978 1975 67,361 1988 1,641,144 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec 1001 (B)(2), Public Law 99-662 1,708,437 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 213,313 33-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Channel Islands Harbor Sep 2000 Dana Point Harbor Aug 2000 Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbors, CA (Port of Los Angeles) Apr 2000 Port of Long Beach, CA Apr 2000 Los Angeles River Estuary, CA Apr 2000 Marina Del Rey, CA Mar 2000 Morro Bay Harbor, CA Aug 2000 Newport Bay Harbor, CA May 2000 Oceanside Harbor, CA Feb 2000 Port Hueneme, CA Jun 2000 San Diego Harbor, CA Sep 2000 San Diego River-Mission Bay, CA Mar 2000 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA May 2000 Ventura Harbor, CA Jan 2000 33-32 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-1 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS/FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, CA San Diego River Channel and Levees, San Diego River Basin, CA 33-33 Date July 1987 July 1987 -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 33-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 40 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost (Federal) Arizona State Flood Warning, AZ Construction $ 59,236 Arroyo Grande Creek, AZ Feasibility 64,390 Foxfield Corridor, Lancaster, CA Feasibility 39,211 City of Laguna Beach, CA Feasibility 244,158 Ephriam Canyon Wash, AZ Feasibility 34,005 Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, CA Completed 1,935 Little Tijuana River, San Diego County, CA Feasibility 30,371 San Jose Creek Near Hollister, CA Feasibility 32,318 Section 205 Coordination Account $518,307 * No further Federal interest 33-34 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT* This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benecia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Crescent City Harbor, CA ................................ 34-1 2. Humboldt Harbor, CA...................................... 34-2 3. Oakland Harbor, CA ........................................ 34-2 4. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA .................... 34-4 5. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ....................................... 34.4 6. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA............................... 34-5 7. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA. .......... 34-5 8. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA .................... 34-6 9. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................... .... .............. 34-7 10. Navigation Work under Special Authorization 34-7 11. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization..................... ............. 34-7 Flood Control 12. Corte Madera Creek, CA.................................. 34-7 13. Petaluma River, Petaluma, CA .......................... 34-8 14. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA .............. 34-9 15. San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA......................... 34-10 16. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 34-10 17. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .................................................... 34-10 Navigation 1. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA Location. The project is located in Crescent City, Del Norte County approximately 350 miles north of San Francisco and 17 miles south of the Oregon border. Existing project. There are two existing Federally maintained navigation channels at Crescent City Harbor. The Entrance Channel begins at the outer breakwater and is -20 feet MLLW (Mean Lower Low Water), 2,600 feet long, and 320 to 200 feet wide. The Entrance Channel connects to the Page 18. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................................ 34-11 19. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization................. ......................... 34-11 General Investigations 20. Surveys ................................. 34-11 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 34-11 22. Preconstruction Engineering and Design Tables Table 34-A Cost and Financial Statement ..................................... 34-15 Table 34-B Authorizing Legislation ................................... 34-21 Table 34-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects....................... 34-25 Table 34-D Not Applicable Table 34-E Not Applicable Table 34-F Not Applicable Table 34-G Deauthorized Projects ................... 34-25 Table 34-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 34-26 Table 34-1 Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work ........ 34-27 Table 34-J Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs ..... ........... 34-27 Inner Harbor Basin, which is 1,500 feet long and extends from the Entrance Channel along the lee side of the inner breakwater. The Inner Harbor Basin is authorized to -20 feet MLLW, but since 1993 has been maintained at -15 feet MLLW due to economic justification. The proposed project would extend the 1965 authorized project approximately 350 feet from the Inner Harbor Basin to reach the entrance of the Small Boat Basin, which was constructed in 1974. The new access channel would vary in width from 140 feet to 210 feet, extend 1,200 feet in length with a channel depth of -14 feet MLLW plus one foot of advanced maintenance. An estimated 24,000 cubic yards of dredged material would be disposed at an upland site. 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Project cost is $1,834,000 of which $1,446,000 is Federal cost and $388,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Crescent City Harbor District. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed in June 2000 and would satisfy the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: 1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 2) pay 10 percent of the costs of construction; and 3) pay an additional 10 percent plus interest of the project costs allocated to general navigation features within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The Harbor contains acommercial small boat basin with 240 permanent berths and temporary moorings for approximately 20 vessels, a 250 slip recreational mooring facility, two fish processing plants with docks, a main dock, a marine repair facility, a U.S. Coast Guard dock, and other auxiliary commercial and recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction commenced in August 2000 and was completed in November 2000. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance includes engineering and design for fall dredging on a 5 year dredging cycle. Approximately 12,000 cubic yards in the Inner Harbor Basin were dredged concurrent with the Channel Improvement Project in FY 2000. 2. HUMBOLDT HARBOR, CA Location. The project is located in Humboldt Bay, about 280 miles north of San Francisco. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of March 3, 1881, July 5, 1884, August 5, 1886, July 3, 1892, March 3, 1889, June 25, 1910, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 26, 1937, July 16, 1952, and August 1968. The project consists of: 1) a Bar and Entrance Channel -48 feet deep, taped from a width of 1,600 feet at seaward mile 0.9 to 500 feet at seaward mile 0.2 and then 500 feet wide to mile 0.8; 2) a North Bay Channel -38 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 0.75 and mile 4.29; 3) an Outer Eureka Channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 4.29 and mile 5.0; 4) an Inner Eureka Channel between mile 5.0 and mile 6.30 which is 26 feet deep and 400 feet wide; 5) a Samoa Channel -38 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 4.29 and mile 5.84; 6) a Turning Basin beyond mile 5.84 at the upper end of the Samoa Channel which is -38 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide by 1,000 feet long; 7) an Anchorage Area 35 feet and 1,200 feet wide by 1,200 feet long in the North Bay between the Entrance Channel and Gunther Island (the anchorage area is not maintained); 8) a Fields Landing Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide and a turning basin at mile 3.16 which is 600 feet wide and 800 feet long; and 9) Arcata Channel located in the extreme North Bay (18 feet deep and 150 feet wide) is no longer used for commercial navigation and has not been maintained since 1931. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized deepening the Bar and Entrance Channel to a depth of -48 MILLW; deepening the North Bay Channel, Samoa Channel, and Samoa Turning Basin to a depth of -38 feet MLLW; widening the north side of the Entrance Channel an additional 200 to 275 feet; moving the southern edge of the Entrance Channel away from the South Jetty and to the north by 100 feet; and widening and realigning the entrance to the Samoa Turning Basin. Project cost is $16,689,000 of which $12,099,000 is Federal cost (includes $200,000 Coast Guard cost) and $4,590,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,680,000 non-Federal reimbursements). Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed in March 1999 and satisfied the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: 1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 2) pay 25 percent of the costs of construction; and 3) pay an additional 10 percent plus interest of the project costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The harbor serves six deep water breakbulk terminals with storage space for 120,000,000 FBM of logs/lumber and 100,000 MT of woodchips and warehouse space for 1,000,000 FBM of lumber and 51,000 MT of woodpulp and particle board. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction commenced in June 1999 and was completed in April 2000. Maintenance: Normal O&M dredging was performed with the Essayons and Yaquina. A combined total of 672,802 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $2,025,000 of which 648,329 cubic yards were from the Bar & Entrance Channel at a cost of $1,623,150; 23,505 cubic yards from the Eureka Channel at a cost of $337,950; and 968 cubic yards from the Fields Landing Channel at a cost of $63,900. All dredged material was deposited in the permanently designated, Government-furnished, Humboldt Open Ocean Disposal Site (HOODS). 3. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, -42 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a channel and turning basin -42 feet deep and from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, -42 feet deep and 600 feet wide to Howard Terminal and 35 feet deep to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove and Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local interests and the Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridge. Oakland Harbor is the 2" largest port on the West Coast and the fifth largest container port in the nation. Traffic consists primarily of containers and containers ships. Ports around the world are increasing channel depths and expanding throughput capacity to compete for the next generation of deep-draft container ships. The Port is proposing to deepen the federal channels of the Oakland Harbor and Port-maintained berths to depths of 50' below MLLW. In constructing this project, the Port expects to dredge up to 12.9 million cubic yards of sediment, which will require reuse and disposal. If the Port does not get down to -50', shipping companies will bypass the Port of Oakland. This will hurt not just the Port of Oakland, but the overall Bay Area economy as well. The recommended/Locally Preferred Plan has a benefit-cost-ratio greater than 6.4 to 1. The estimated construction cost is $252.3 million, including $38 million of local service facilities (LSF) (berth rehabilitation & deepening). Disposal options for dredged material include the San Francisco Deep Ocean Disposal Site (SF-DODS), Middle Harbor or the Fleet and Industrial Supply, Oakland (FISCO), Hamilton Airfield, Montezuma wetland restoration project, together with upland disposal/reuse at Mare Island and Alameda Point. Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1999 authorized this project for $252.3 million. Local cooperation. A draft Project Cooperation Agreement satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662 was sent to Corps Headquarters for review and approval in early Feb 2001. The agreement includes the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction to a depth in excess of 20 feet but not in excess of 45'; (3) pay 50% of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction in excess of 45';and (4) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Deepening to 42' MLLW was completed in July 1998. The Port of Oakland completed a feasibility study to deepen Oakland Harbor to -50' MLLW at 100% Port cost under the authority of Section 203 of WRDA 86. The estimated project cost is $254 million with an average annual navigation benefit of $178 million. Project was authorized in WRDA 99. Construction is scheduled to begin in spring of 2001. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction to a depth in excess of 20 feet but not in excess of 45'. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue R.R. Bridge including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $289,600; operations and maintenance of Miller-Sweeney Highway Bridge, cost $180,900; and operations and maintenance of Oakland Harbor 517,153 cubic yards removed at a cost of 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 $10,388,484. San Francisco Deep Ocean Disposal Site (SFDODS) was utilized for material disposal. 4. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay into the Port of Richmond. The Southampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, at the entrance to the harbor channels are maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel, to -38 feet and the remainder of the Santa Fe Channel from the Lauritzen Channel confluence to -30 feet. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with one maneuvering area: in front of the Long Wharf. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point, 1,200 feet wide and 38 feet deep. Thence, the channel continues into the Inner Harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Improvements consisted of a construction plan involving four and one-half miles of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the Santa Fe Channel. The project deepened the existing 35-foot channels to 38 feet, and provided a turning basin of 1,200 feet near Point Potrero. Approximately 2,200,000 cubic yards of sediment were dredged and transported to aquatic and upland disposal sites. Construction was completed in August 1998. The project cost is $40,000,000 of which $28,300,000 is Federal cost (includes $130,000 Coast Guard costs) and $11,700,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,310,000 non- Federal reimbursements). The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water yesources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent with interest of the costs allocated to general navigation facility of the project within a period of 30 years following completion of construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the projects. The value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction project completed in May 1998. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance dredging of Richmond Outer Harbor was performed by the U.S. Hopper dredge "Essayons." The Essayons removed 145,304 cubic yards of shoal material from the Outer Harbor, cost $861,120. The Inner Harbor portion was deferred because of lack of shoaling due to the recent completion of the Deepening Project. 5. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. The location is the John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Pt.. Avon to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Pt.. Avon; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area were completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1996) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Estimated volume of dredged material is 9 million cubic yards. A new alternative initially proposed by the sponsor would create a pipeline 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT terminal north of the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge. Dredging of less than 50k CY and a greatly shortened navigation channel 2 miles long by 600 feet wide by 45-foot deep would eliminate or minimize the serious issues facing project construction including salinity intrusion, disposal site selection, air quality, and endangered species preservation. In February 1999, this sponsor withdrew support for a pipeline terminal. Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1991, No. 31, revised 1991, and No. 32, revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 6. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Location. The Sonoma Baylands site is located in Sonoma County, CA, approximately 25 miles north of San Francisco near the mouth of the Petaluma River, on the northern shoreline of San Pablo Bay. Existing project. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The project includes restoration of tidal wetlands on 348 acres of diked lands, including construction of 11,645 feet of replacement levee around the landward periphery of the site, fifteen internal peninsulas for wave protection, three weirs for the discharge of dredged material supernatant, and modification of three existing high voltage electrical towers. Project included placement of 207,000 cubic yards of maintenance-dredged material from the Petaluma River navigation channel in a pilot project area and placement of 1.7 million cubic yards of suitable dredged material from the Oakland Harbor deepening projects on the remainder of the site. Placement of material was completed on November 6, 1995. The project cost is $8,900,000, of which $6,675,000 is Federal cost and $2,225,000 is non-Federal cost. Oakland deepening to -42' MLLW was completed in July 1998. Local cooperation. The California State Coastal Conservancy signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 6, 1994 satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, PL 102-580 and signed an amendment on December 9, 1994 to include the placement of Oakland Harbor dredged material. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easement, and right of ways; (2) modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; (pay 25 percent of the total project cost in accordance with Section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Terminal facilities. N/A Operations during fiscal year. The project was restored to tidal action on October 25, 1996. Monitoring of the project is continuing. Project was turned over to California Coastal Conservancy in August 1998 for operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the functional portion of the project. 7. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA Location. The model, including a Class A regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of the model continues. 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Annual visitation to the model averages between 140,000 to 150,000 people. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative Association provides financial and educational support to both engineering operations and visitor center programming. An active volunteer program exists at the Visitor Center providing approximately 300 hours of effort monthly. The hydraulic engineering department closed 4 January 2000. The Visitor Center operations continues to offer public informationeducational services via programs, exhibits, and special events. The Visitor Center is currently developing new interpretive and exhibit plans. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 2000, was $37,001,373 of which $15,125,563 was for the regional visitor center, $1,383,324 for exhibits, and $20,492,486 for maintenance. 8. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA Location. The San Francisco Bay Long-Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredged material disposal covers deep and shallow draft navigation channels of the San Francisco Bay region including Central San Francisco Bay, South Bay, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay environs. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay region has an annual disposal requirement of approximately 6 million cubic yards (mcy) to maintain navigation channels. The Bay also has a one-time new civil works requirement of approximately 16 mcy for the Oakland Harbor, Richmond Harbor, and John F. Baldwin Phase III ship channel. In January 1990, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission convened with approximately thirty interested agencies and organizations with concerns regarding dredged material disposal in San Francisco Bay. These four agencies have the responsibility for regulation of the waters of the US and California for disposal of dredged material. The four agencies and the concerned navigation interests formed the LTMS to develop technically feasible, economically prudent, and environmentally acceptable long range solutions to the dredging and disposal needs for the San Francisco Bay region over the next fifty years. In determining acceptable dredged material disposal locations, the LTMS is evaluating a broad array of potential ocean, in-Bay and non-aquatic beneficial uses disposal alternatives. Local cooperation. Pursuant to their regulatory responsibilities, the Division Commander of the South Pacific Division, Corps of Engineers; the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board and the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission agreed to jointly undertake the development and implementation of a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredging and disposal of dredged materials from the region. Based on the outputs from the LTMS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) will consider modifications to the dredging elements of their respective Basin and Bay Plans for San Francisco Bay. Regulatory Streamlining: Besides identifying implementable disposal options, the LTMS will: (1) develop coordinated regional disposal policies between federal and state agencies; (2) provide a local decision-making framework for dredging and disposal projects; (3) streamline existing permit and testing procedures; and (4) provide a long term site monitoring apparatus and feedback mechanism. Operations during fiscal year. In 1994, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated a deep ocean disposal site. In 1996, the Corps, EPA, and the State of California implemented a joint agency Dredged Material Management Office (DMMO) for dredging permit processing. The Final LTMS EIS is scheduled to be released in October 1999. The EIS will identify Alternative 3 as the preferred alternative that would limit future disposal to 20% in the San Francisco Bay, 40% in the ocean, and 40% for upland beneficial reuse. Final comments and response to comments as well as a Draft Record of Decision (ROD) were reviewed by Corps Headquarters in July 1999. The Division Commander and EPA's Regional Administrator signed the Final ROD in August 1999. The signing of the ROD initiates implementation for Federal agencies. The implementation efforts will be finalized through the development of a management plan detailing the policies and procedures for implementing the selected alternative. Adoption of the management plan will require amending the Bay and Basin Plans. BCDC amended the San Francisco Bay Plans in December 2000 and the RWQCB is scheduled to amend the San Francisco Bay Plans in April 2001. 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT In general, the programmatic EIS requires future project-by-project analysis for "practicability" in terms of fiscal and environmental impacts. This effort will be accomplished with the Dredge Material Management Plan for San Francisco Bay. This two year study was initiated in FY 01. 9. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal Year 2000 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Berkeley; Bodega Bay; Crescent City Harbor; Islais Creek; Mare Island Strait; Monterey Harbor; Moss Landing Harbor, Noyo River, Petaluma River, Pillar Point; Pinole Shoal; Redwood City; Richmond Harbor, San Leandro Marina; San Rafael; Santa Cruz; Sausalito Canal; and Suisun Channel; all in California. Fiscal year costs were $907,112. 10. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). None. Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). None. 11. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $9,504 for East Cliff Drive, Santa Cruz, CA. Flood Control 12. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. Existing Project. Provided for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprap, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of flood proofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte Madera Creek. Local Cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley units 1-4 and tidal areas. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The flood control project has been built in separate units. The 34-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 II I I II l I I 1 I current project focuses on the design and construction of unit 4 with modifications to units 2 and 3. Unit 4 includes a natural flood control channel and a sedimentation basin located at the town of Ross. The General Reevaluation Report (GRR) was initiated in February 1999. As long as the originally authorized project remains the recommended project, the 1966 authorized cost sharing and financing requirements will be applicable. A community-based Design Advisory Committee has been created with representatives from Ross, Kentfield, Corte Madera, and Larkspur to provide community input on the conceptual plan. The conceptual plan is based on the Marin County Board of Supervisors' Design Guidelines for a consensus plan which was approved in 1996. The GRR will be developed in two phases. Phase I will develop alternatives based on the design guidelines and determine if the project benefits exceed the costs. Phase HI will complete the GRR and environmental documentation. Phase I is scheduled for completion in July 2001, and Phase II in September 2003. Construction of Unit 4 and attendant feature in the downstream units is being determined. The communities of Corte Madera, Larkspur, Kenfield and Ross have reviewed the alternatives screening conference report and have provided recommendations for a locally preferred plan. The non-Federal sponsor, Marin County Flood Control District 9 will make consolidated recommendation by July 01 that will guide the final development of the GRR during Phase II. Local interest in a watershed study for Corte Madera Creek is being pursued through a separate study authority. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred to Sacramento District on April 1, 1982 and back to the San Francisco District on October 1, 1996. Resolution 96-26 was passed on February 1, 1996 by the Marin County Board of Supervisors in support of a 40-year project. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 1987, San Francisco District monitors maintenance and operation of the project. The project was transferred from Sacramento District in October 1996. Design process began in the San Francisco District to complete Unit 4. 13. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CA Location. The Petaluma River Basin is situated in the Sonoma and Marin Counties, California, on the northwestern shore of San Pablo Bay. The project site extends upstream approximately 500 feet from Lynch Creek to the spur line Railroad Bridge located approximately 600 feet downstream of the Lakeville Street Bridge. Existing project. The project was re-authorized under Section 112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000. The scope of the project consists of constructing the Ushaped channel, an earthen trapezoidal channel including the channel excavation and widening, the two hundred (200) feet concrete constriction weir, an approximately one - mile - long sheet pile flood / retaining wall along both sides of the main channel, two (2) storm drain pump stations, twelve (12) storm drain outlet structures in various locations of the channel, two (2) large mitigation areas including planting in the embankment slope throughout the project site, two hundred (200 ) feet long transition channel work, replacing two (2) vehicular bridges and two (2) railroad bridges, and demolishing the existing railroad wood trestle. Present estimated cost of the project is $32,277,000 of which $20,947,000 is Federal cost and $11,279,000 is non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. The project was executed based on the original Petaluma River Project Cooperation Agreement in July 1996 under the continuing Authorities Program, Section 205 - Small Flood Control Projects. The project costs have exceeded the Continuing Authorities Program cost limits and was specifically authorized in WRDA 2000, Section 112. Further, Congressional direction in the House Report 106-693 accompanying the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill 2001 provides guidance to the Corps to utilize the available federal funds to continue project construction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The construction of Contract #1 for the U-shaped channel portion was completed in December 1998. The construction of the Payran Bridge and Lackville Bridge was completed under the local sponsor's contract in 1996 and 1998, respectively. The construction contract #2 for the trapezoidal channel was awarded in May 1999. The features of work in contract #2 completed in September 2000, included the floodwall \ retaining wall in both sides of the channel, the channel widening and excavation, the constriction weir, the flood 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT control features including the two (2) Storm Pump Stations and the storm drain outlets and the mitigation planting throughout the project site. Contract #2 is scheduled for completion in early May 2001. The remainder of the work to be completed including the correction of the mitigation areas in the Homlberg site and finalizing the deficient items in the punch list. The mainline Railroad Bridge, one of the two railroad bridges is currently under construction by the local sponsor's contract, and is scheduled for completion in early April 2001. Contract #3 for the Channel Transition is tentatively scheduled for completion in November FY01, Contract #4 for the mainline railroad approach and demolition of the existing railroad wood trestle in FY02, and Contract #5 for replacing the downstream spur line railroad bridge in FY03. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Petaluma River Channel including engineering and design. No contract dredging scheduled in FY01. 14. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 34-I and 34-J for latest approved estimated costs.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962 and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: Major work includes replacing wooden water tanks with aluminum at Kyen & Bushay campgrounds and Overlook day-use area; repaving roads at Overlook, Mendocino Drive Road, and Southboat Ramp Parking lot; and repairing the emergency slide gate in the control tower. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. Major work includes repairing the Liberty Glen Campground Entrance Road using ERFO funds and the stabilization of the Control Tower Access Road. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was normal for the year. Maximum storage of 93,699 acre-feet occurred on May 15, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 3,187 cubic feet per second on February 12, 2000. Maximum release of 3,812 cubic feet per second occurred on February 17, 2000. During the year, 83,718 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 122,480 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was normal for the year. Maximum storage of 270,139 acre-feet occurred February 15, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 8,196 cubic feet per second on February 14, 2000. Maximum release of 4,079 cubic feet per second occurred February 16, 2000. During the year, 64,524 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 103,179 acre-feet 34-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Responsibility for civil works operations & maintenance functions for the two projects was transferred back to San Francisco District October 1, 1996. Warm Spring construction completion include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial filing of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. Responsibility for civil works operations and maintenance functions for the two projects was transferred back to San Francisco District October 1, 1996. 15. SAN PEDRO CREEK, PACIFICA, CA Location. The study area is located along San Pedro Creek in the lower Linda Mar area of Pacifica, in San Mateo County, just south of San Francisco, California. Existing Project. The project is authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The Linda Mar area of Pacifica has experienced periodic flood damages caused by stream bank overflow from events greater than the 4-year flood. In the most recent severe flood (1982), 183 residential and 10 commercial properties suffered $4,000,000 in damages. The NED plan, which will provide protection against the one-percent event, is the recommended plan. The NED plan is a wetland-diversion plan which involves an upstream diversion structure at the Adobe Drive bridge with flood flows being diverted via an underground pipeline to a wetland/flood basin which would discharge through concrete culverts under the Highway 1 bridge. The wetland/flood basin will replace a freshwater wetland, which existed in the area before the turn of the century. An 800-foot long floodwall will be constructed along the northern bank of the creek near the newly reconstructed wetland. This floodwall will extend downstream to Highway 1. The BCR for the Recommended Plan is 2.4 to I and the Detailed Project Report was finished in January 1998. Present estimated total cost for the project $16,600,000 of which $7,000,000 is Federal cost and $9,600,000 is non-Federal cost. Local Cooperation. City of Pacifica signed a Project Cooperation Agreement in March 2000, satisfying the requirement of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Operations During Fiscal Year. Construction of Phase I-channel realignment and wetland restoration-began at the end of FY 00. Phase II construction is scheduled for an early FY 02 start and consists of the same features. The Phase III construction plans for the underground pipeline is currently on hold. Scheduled completion date is March 2003. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. In addition, encroachments to Federal Projects such as new bridges, etc. must be reviewed and approved prior to construction by the local sponsor, as well as in compliance with the Clean Water Act permit and endangered species concerns regarding their operations and maintenance activities. Fiscal year cost was $204,922. Total cost to September 30, 2000 was $3,279,190. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $1,434,213 for preauthorization studies of which $11,895 were for Petaluma River, Sonoma 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT County, CA; $1,235,218 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; $104,188 for White Slough, Solano County, CA; $9,980 for Novato Creek Tributary, Novato, CA; $61,603 for Coyote Creek at Rock Springs, CA; and $11,329 for Section 205 Coordination Account. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year cost incurred for emergency flood control activities were $3,949,897 of which $2,899,113 were for Disaster Preparedness; $9,500 for Emergency Operations and $1,041,284 for Rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14,1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year total costs were $43,586 of which $375 was for Cliff Drive, Capitola, CA; $36,313 was fro Shelter Cove, Humboldt County, CA; and $6,898 for Section 14 Coordination Account. 18. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Del Valle, CA were prepared. No water control manual revisions were completed due to environmental issues. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at the reservoir. Fiscal year cost was $52,920. 19. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modification for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, PL 99-662). Fiscal year total costs were $72,759 of which $7,023 were for Initial Appraisals; and $65,736 for Wildcat Creek Restoration, CA. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206, PL 104-303). Fiscal year total costs were $1,466 of which was Coordination Account funds. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,569,417 of which $147,369 were for navigation studies; $278,399 for flood damage prevention; $1,074,408 for special studies; $59,655 for miscellaneous activities; and $9,586 for coordination studies with other agencies. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $17,130 were incurred, of which $11,214 was for Flood Plain Management Service Program and, $5,916 for Hydrologic Studies. 22. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLAND RESTORATION, CA Hamilton Airfield is a 700-acre parcel consisting of an inactive runway and adjacent taxi areas. It is located 4 miles east of the City of Novato, on San Pablo Bay, in Marin County, California. The area, currently protected by levees, has subsided below the elevation of surrounding properties, including the tidal wetlands immediately adjacent to San Pablo Bay. Storm water runoff from adjacent properties is collected on the airfield and transferred to San Pablo Bay from the site by a drainage system including a pump station and concrete ditches. In conjunction with the ongoing Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) cleanup process, the Base Reuse Authority would like to restore the area to a tidal wetland. Wetlands would be created with the use of dredged material from San Francisco Bay navigation projects, including the Oakland 50' deepening project. The Final Feasibility Study and EIS/EIR was completed December 15, 1998 with the issuance of the Division Engineer's Public Notice followed by the Report of the Chief of Engineers in August 1999, and authorization in the 1999 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). For the BRAC portion, the airfield is being closed with the City of Novato acting as the Reuse Authority. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, is managing the environmental cleanup and closure of the base. Remaining tasks in the BRAC process are; completing the site risk assessment, remediation, and transfer of the airfield property to the state of California State Coastal Conservancy by the end of FY 2000. The site does have existing contamination in the form of DDT, hydrocarbon compounds and heavy metals, the magnitude of which is being determined in the risk assessment. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) has been formalized between the Department of Defense (DOD)/BRAC command and the 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Conservancy to ensure that the clean up of the site is suitable for wetland restoration for endangered species. A Pre-construction Engineering and Design (PED) cost sharing agreement was signed in August 1999 for $1.2 million dollars between the Corps and the Conservancy. An additional $1.2 million dollar modification to the design agreement was signed in February 2001. The first phase of construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2001. An adjacent State Lands Commission owned parcel will be remediated under the Formally Used Defense Sites (FUDS) program at a future unknown date. A second MOA for the FUDS parcel will be formalized between DOD and the Conservancy before the BRAC transfer of the airfield occurs. This MOA will ensure that the estimated $26 million dollar clean up of the site is suitable for wetland restoration for endangered species and occurs at a future date that meets the construction schedule for the rest of the restoration site. An Ecosystem Restoration Initial Appraisal (WRDA 1999, Section 204) for another adjacent parcel (1600 acre Bel Marin Keys (BMK) property) was completed in October 2000. It identified the federal interest and recommended that this parcel be added to the Hamilton Wetlands Restoration Project (HAAF). The Conservancy has subsequently purchased the BMK parcel. A new FCSA will be executed in May 2001 for BMK feasibility level tasks required to incorporate the parcel within the existing Hamilton Wetlands Restoration Project. LLAGAS CREEK, CA The project is located in southern Santa Clara County, California, in the vicinity of the communities of Morgan Hill, San Martin, and Gilroy. The project primarily consists of channel improvements and a diversion channel providing a 100-year level of flood protection to urban areas and 10-year protection to agricultural areas at a benefit-tocost ratio of 1.1. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has constructed about half of the authorized project, Reaches 1, 2, 3, part of 4, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. A supplemental environmental evaluation is currently being prepared by the NRCS to address Reaches 4, 5, 6, 7 and 14. These reaches would complete work on the remainder of the project with the exception of Reach 8 through the town of Morgan Hill. The supplemental environmental evaluation will update biological surveys including potential existence of the endangered red-legged frog as well as Section 404 (Clean Water Act) jurisdictional determinations for wetlands. The 1999 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) authorized the Corps of Engineers to complete construction of this project. Alternatives are being studied for Reach 8 to develop a locally desired alternative different from the concrete channel previously considered for this portion of the work. The Corps' San Francisco District will initiate a $250,000 effort to develop alternatives for a diversion channel in Reach 7A. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the NRCS and the Corps for design support on the project is under review. As design of Reaches 4 through 7 is complete, pending environmental clearance and funding, preparation of construction plans and specifications and construction could proceed following construction of the diversion channel. However, design of Reach 8 is not complete. Consequently, preparation and approval of a cost-shared Detailed Design Memorandum (DDM) could accomplish validation of project justification. Plans and specifications for construction of Reach 8 would follow such documentation. Construction is forecasted to begin in the 2" quarter of FY 04. NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached offshore 400-foot breakwater aligned in a north-south direction along the southern portion of Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. The plan also provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. The June 1995 draft GDM estimated the breakwater cost at $23,312,000 of which $18,712,000 is Federal cost and $4,600,000 is non- Federal cost Subsequent to the draft GDM, the Conference Report on H.R. 1905, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1996 directs the Corps to investigate the viability of a pre-fabricated steel structure in lieu of a rubble mound breakwater, including modeling. A special report, which documented this evaluation, was completed in January 1997. A meeting with the Local Sponsor, PG&E and the City of Fort Bragg was held 5 February 1997 to discuss the Corps' findings. Integrating wave power generation to the breakwater does not decrease the Sponsor's 34-12 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT annualized cost because the Sponsor is required to pay all costs associated with power generation. Two letters from the Noyo Harbor District, dated 26 February 1997, requested the Corps finalize the GDM and discontinue study of integrating wave power generation into the breakwater. Due to sponsor's inability to fulfill its cost-sharing requirements, preparation of a final GDM was terminated. This project has been put in an inactive category at the request of the sponsor. PAJARO RIVER AT WATSONVILLE, CA The Pajaro River is the dividing line between Santa Cruz and Monterey County located approximately 100 miles south of San Francisco on Monterey Bay. Flooding in the city of Watsonville, the town of Pajaro, and surrounding agricultural lands prompted a re-examination of flood damage prevention in the Pajaro basin. The project provides for modification of the existing levee system built by the Corps in 1949 and includes 2.5 miles of flood control levees and/or floodwalls on Salsipuedes Creek and Corralitos Creek, tributaries of the Pajaro River, as well as pump systems located outside of existing levees on the Pajaro River. The tributaries are located 6 miles from the river mouth. Since the only alternative with Federal interest was within the existing 1966 Rivers and Harbor Act construction authority, the reconnaissance study was certified in August 1994 with the recommendation to proceed directly to a General Reevaluation Report (GRR) on raising levees along a portion of Corralitos and Salsipuedes Creeks. Flooding along the main stem of the Pajaro River in January and March 1995 caused in excess of $65,000,000 in damages. Additional damages were incurred during the floods of January 1997 and February 1998. It is likely that we will incorporate a reexamination of main stem alternatives in the ongoing GRR for the creeks. Consequently, the Corps will proceed with technical tasks, including a geotechnical investigation of the Pajaro River levees as part of the GRR. Contingent on funding, the GRR is scheduled to be completed in FY 2002. If the GRR finds a federal interest in flood control improvements along either the Pajaro mainstem or Salsipuedes and Corralitos creeks, construction contract plans and specifications would be prepared in FY 2003. If funded, local real estate acquisition and construction could proceed the following fiscal year. OAKLAND HARBOR 50', CA Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay, immediately south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Behind Los Angeles, Oakland Harbor is the second largest port on the West Coast and the fifth largest container port in the nation. Traffic consists primarily of containers and container ships. Ports around the world are increasing channel depths and expanding throughput capacity to compete for the next generation of deep-draft container ships. The project is proposing to deepen the federal channels of the Oakland Harbor and Port-maintained berths from 42' to depths of 50' below Mean lower Low Water (MLLW). In constructing this project, up to 12.8 million cubic yards of sediment would be dredged, which will require disposal. The recommended plan has a benefit-cost-ratio greater than 6.4 to 1. The estimated construction cost is $253 million, including $38 million of local service facilities (berth rehabilitation and deepening). Approximately 7.0 mcy of dredged material would be deposited in the middle harbor enhancement area (MHEA); 2.5 mcy of dredged material would be transported to the proposed Hamilton Wetlands Restoration project (HWRP); 2.9 mcy of dredged material would be disposed of at the existing Montezuma Wetlands Restoration project (MWRP); 0.3 mcy of dredged material would be transported to the Vision 2000 upland site; and 0.1 mcy of dredged material would be sent to an upland land fill. The -42' deepening project was completed in July 1998. A feasibility study and environmental impact statement/report for the -50' project was prepared by the Port under the authority of Section 203 of Public Law 99-662, and submitted to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works in February 1999. Chief's Report was signed 21 April 1999 and the Design Agreement for the -50' project Pre-construction, Engineering and Design (PED) was executed 24 March 1999. This project was authorized in the 1999 Water Resources Development Act. The PED of the - 50' deepening project started in April 1999 with completion scheduled by February 2001. Construction contract award is scheduled in April 2001. SAN RAFAEL CANAL, CA San Rafael Canal is located on the northwestern shoreline of San Francisco Bay in the city of San Rafael, about 17 miles north of the city of San Francisco. The Canal is surrounded by San Rafael's central business district and dense residential areas. The Study was authorized by a resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the United States House of Representatives on August 8, 1984, Section 142 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587), as subsequently amended in Section 705 of WRDA of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). The project was authorized for construction in Section 101 of WRDA of 1996. The Feasibility Study recommended the South Floodwall Plan. This plan consists of approximately 9,500 linear feet of floodwall constructed along the south bank of 34-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the canal and 1,600 feet of sheet-pile floodwall along the crest of the Bayfront levee on the east side of the canal ways tract. The South Floodwall Plan has a benefit-to-cost ratio of 2.0 to 1. Total costs during the fiscal year were $42,351 with General Investigations funds. The estimated project cost is $32,200,000 of which $20,930,000 is Federal cost and $11,270,000 is non-Federal cost. Preconstruction Engineering and Design was initiated in October 1992. The Corps is proposing a continuous floodwall design which is estimated to save between $11.6 to $14.1 million compared to the South Floodwall Plan, as recommended in the Feasibility Study. A letter was sent to the City of San Rafael in December 1996 requested Sponsor's agreement with the Corps proposal to finalize the project design based on the continuous flood wall concept. A District Engineer letter to the Mayor, City of San Rafael, dated 25 September 1997, informed the City that the_ project has been placed in a suspended status. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA The Upper Guadalupe River Feasibility Study area is located in the City of San Jose, Santa Clara County, California. The reach of the river proposed for improvement begins at interstate Highway 280 at the edge of downtown San Jose and extends south for about 5.5 miles. The feasibility study evaluated a variety of nonstructural and structural plans of improvement for flood protection in the Upper Guadalupe basin. The final feasibility study report and Environmental Impact Statement/Report was submitted to South Pacific Division on January 30, 1998. This report recommended Federal participation in a project providing a 50-year level of flood protection. The locally preferred plan, presently requiring additional sponsor (Santa Clara Valley Water District) funding, would provide a 100-year level of protection. The Division Engineer's Public Notice was issued on February 27, 1998 and a Chief of Engineer's Report was signed August 19, 1998. The project has been authorized for construction in the 1999 Water Resources Development Act The Design Agreement for the follow-on Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) phase was signed on February 25, 1999. PED was initiated in April 1999. PED is scheduled to complete by the end of FY 2002. 34-14 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 InR n Rayv CA New Work 12. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. (Contrib. Funds, Other) 1. Crescent City Harbor, CA (Contrib. Funds, Other) Fisherman's Wharf Areas, San Francisco Hamilton Airfield Wetland Restoration, CA (Contrib. Funds, Other) 2. Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA (Contrib. Funds, Other) Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA Larkspur Ferry Channel, CA Llagus Creek, CA Moss Landing Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost New Work A prop. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost New Work A prop. ost New Work. Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost New Work AProp. Cst &PJJM~b4 "A.T. 1-6-A %.F&AV 465,000 465,000 203,610 203,610 - 338,215 - 338,215 34-15 12 40 1340 440 440 5 5 1,226,765 1,226,765 39,421 5,423 47,441 95,044 1,369,250 39,421 5,423 47,441 93,344 1,367,550 - - 397,779 - - - - 397,779 89,000 304,000 565,000 329,000 13,745,725 56,750 232,311 595,772 348,755 13,680,358 - - - 190,355 - - - - 190,213 - 804,761 - - - 804,761 337,000 511,000 96,000 744,000 11,142,972 326,886 144,972 268,976 526,892 10,722,698 -- - - 249,290 249,290 79,707 833,791 36,704 460,298 26,208,797 79,707 644,254 226,230 242,621 25,991,109 - - - 525,000 525,000 9,199,000 9, 199,000 1,170 - - 11,882 400,370 1,170 - - 11,882 400,370 - - 75,000 538,000 613,000 -- 8,007 459,633 467,640 - - - 302,000 302,000 S- - 302,608 302,608 2,525,000 40,000 6,799,000 1,056,000 20,802,299 352,308 381,280 6,292,068 3,353,115 20,726,841 -- - 2,295,000 1,405,000 3,700,000 S- 1,899,999 691,087 2,591,086 2,655,000 2,398,890 3,933,480 3,956,700 92,842,777 2,285,181 2,676,508 4,022,327 3,963,217 92,535,642 (109,000) - (23,000) - 558,000 483,298 (21,439) - - 557,818 - - - 3,240,000 3,240,000 - - - 131,396 131,396 1140 1140 62 62 63 63 64 64 640 640 740 740 88 414850 414950 51 51 940 940 1040 1040 65 65 _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Napa River, CA Noyo River and Harbor, CA 3. Oakland Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Oakland Harbor 50', CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Pajaro River at Watsonville, CA 13. Petaluma River, CA (Contributed Funds) Pillar Point Harbor, CA Redwood City Harbor, CA Removal of Sunken Vessels 4. Richmond Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Aprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 -- --- - - - IPOAf 1,061,475 624,030 1,092,591 525,347 9,958,073 955,370 491,269 1,305,020 548,684 9,948,957 - - 1,021,274 - - - - 1,021,274 975,090 476,000 1,335,000 5,000 7,764,763 829,180 280,615 1,627,680 53,423 7,758,901 103,000 (24,000) - - 4,121,000 194,562 8,564 - - 4,120,596 370,997 - 78,899 857,713 10,277,848 324,323 69,423 79,968 462,231 9,882,366 -- 222,810 222,810 9,744,000 26,131,000 - (100,000) 93,302,684 10,207,445 26,025,231 634,964 186,363 93,266,240 3,041,973 3,877,727 3,287,279 10,310,940 67,061,514 3,020,151 3 ,458,835 3,700,050 10,410,524 67,061,478 2,447,239 6,995,637 46,000 5,000 24,241,142 5,039,611 8,891,780 517,029 2,563 24,114,505 - - 752,000 2,438,000 3,190,000 - - 651,580 2,427,815 3,079,395 - - 824,340 365,189 1,189,529 - - 458,735 627,415 1,086,150 568,000 408,000 141,000 615,000 2,701,100 561,854 380,036 197,039 507,590 2,588,679 978,000 800,000 1,286,166 - 5,474,751 405,274 1,012,935 1,787,369 11,895 5,301,474 406,102 1,852,000 (296,000) 175,966 16,855,504 458,020 756,114 799,886 174,413 16,853,951 - 759,000 4,000,000 4,535,000 9,294,000 - 1,178,338 2,142,728 4,843,203 8,164,269 - - - - 6,697,396 - - - - 6,697,396 2,744 38,626 4,745 41,004 2,394,134 2,744 38,626 4,745 41,004 2,394,134 - - - - 1,672,722 - - - - 1,672,722 (312,476) 638,075 2,474,538 130,108 21,589,994 (362,474) 243,519 2,919,092 129,394 21,276,804 - - - 283,068 -.. 283,068 1,235,400 17,809,000 (877,000) (150,000) 30,160,427 948,950 16,156,205 619,718 369,847 30,132,995 34-16 12 40 1240 13 40 1340 13 1440 13 14 40 15 16 40 15 17 40 18 19 40 1819 40 20 40 20 40 21 21 22 22 23 40 23 40 2440 2440 43 44 43 44 4445 4445 25 40 25 40 2640 2640 27 28 27 28 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Total Cost to in Text Project (Contributed Funds) 14. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Fed Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) San Clemente Creek, CA 5. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (Contributed Funds) 7. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA 8. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA Funding Maint Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work -Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 97 FY 98 FY99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 4,336,736 6,515,445 2,947,219 2,557,179 4,315,263 6,491,813 2,991,913 2,563,937 3,437,000 4,487,200 1,033,730 6,681,933 (5,000) 20,523 53,190,298 53,185,712 164,689 164,689 7,919,200 7,736,186 29 40 29 40 - - - - 14,435,869 _4 - - - - 14,435,869 54 2,834,378 2,869,000 3,023,000 3,761,000 57,516,902 sS 2,572,324 2,766,987 3,040,923 4,071,397 57,469,385 5s - - - - 589,911 6 - - - - 570,774 57 S- - 333,108,645 5 S- - 333,081,773 58 4,295,991 5,508,000 4,133,000 4,144,000 3,661,869 5,069,869 4,923,360 4,159,938 198,000 (198,000) 623,000 320,000 1,091,643 310,637 - 88,316 1,990,000 1,970,461 550,000 367,759 1,805,000 1,896,557 40,000 29,048 51,275,934 59 49,919,980 59 230,574 6062 228,732 6163 - - 38,837,200 42 124,167 (37,422) 38,778,337 42 (5,000) 3,397 88,316 3,937 2,042,000 2,254,300 37,233,217 2,073,435 2,228,816 37,001,374 214,766 11,951,000 11,951,000 San Francisco New Work Harbor, CA San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay, CA (Removal of Drift) San Leandro Marina, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Atpprop. Cost - - - - 2,689,356 283040 2,689,356 283040 1,384,000 1,109,542 1,056,480 1,892,650 43,517,329 3140 1,389,663 1,090,286 1,080,511 1,893,895 43,517,314 3140 1,960,000 2,067,000 1,498,000 2,039,700 45,468,280 40 2,023,648 1,616,890 1,661,854 2,351,227 45,412,683 40 34-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SSeecet ion I Total Cost to in Text Project San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA 15. San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) San Rafael Canal, CA San Rafael Creek, CA Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demo Project, CA (Contrib. Funds) Suisun Bay Channel,CA Approp. Suisun Channel, CA Upper Guadalupe River, CA (Contrib. Funds) Fundinga Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp 231,090 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. A prop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work A prop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost FY 97 FY 98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 22,316 2,602,504 2,616,786 400,000 741,705 (881) 67,280 67,282 1,700,000 1,235,218 258,981 (2,000) 917,600 78,000 837,178 136,106 - 51,037 - 51,037 1,027,000 388,341 1,034,130 387,584 - 398,500 24,237 47,189 1,200 10,539 (37,000) 42,351 4,509 (1,000) 4,659,439 32 4,659,439 32 1,420,409 283340 1,420,409 283340 47,305,634 3440 47,305,636 3440 3,070,100 2,570,862 667,300 419,127 2,180,000 2,179,197 32,359 32,359 1,222,602 476,413 100,778 48,694 1,149,852 535,858 163,428 46,619 4047 4047 6,885,736 4046 6,883,661 46 4,126,808 52 4,126,808 52 160,000 160,000 4,690 33,205 4,690 33,205 500,000 720,000 872,566 707,798 - 75,000 231,090 8,567 65,563 29,419 65,563 29,419 69,876 97,560 70,908 5,000 35 35 9,861,63640 53 9,861,636 4053 6,320,100 6,312,064 906,560 796,980 200,928 36 200,928 36 178,400 3,299,252 1,664,500 2,640,365 16,670,861 37 320,469 3,142,611 1,832,423 2,653,929 16,670,823 37 - - - - 217,677 38 - - - - 217,677 38 75,505 75,505 - 100,217 - 100,217 50,000 233,000 4,185 261,202 - 385,000 284,088 11,231 11,231 1,008,000 1,019,028 1,320,000 101,902 3,002,462 39 3,002,462 39 1,291,000 1,284,415 1,705,000 385,990 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $585,000 Preconstruction Planning costs ($456,000 Construction General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $873,207 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. Excludes contributed funds of $385,134. 34-18 it 9- - --- @ woomm SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $797,592 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $26,457 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $310,954 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. Excludes contributed funds of $290,653. 13. Excludes previous project costs. 14. Includes $943,187 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. Excludes $496,307 contributed funds. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $4,145,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($3,565,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $3,065,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $4,112,031 Preconstruction cost ($3,532,031 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $3,032,031 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 was under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $37,810 for previous project and $202,279 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on previous projects. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $136,234 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. Excludes contributed funds of $43,474. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $536,990 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. Excludes contributed funds of $192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $837,004 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship C annels)." 29. Excludes $115,536 contributed funds. Includes $238,825 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $813,611 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $321,488 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-2000. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $879,454. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $128,516 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-2000. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds on previous project. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for detail. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $48,735 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-2000. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $746,637 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-2000. Includes $727,510 for previous project. Excludes $121,386 contributed funds. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $240,334 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-2000. 46. Includes $445,915 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-2000. Excludes $93,500 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 49. Includes $9,199,000 costs of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $77,340 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989-2000. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 53. Includes $179,294 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1993-2000. 54. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds: $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 55. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 56. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $338,000 from California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 57. Includes $250,117 contributed funds, other costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $320,657 for California Department of 34-19 IIR - -EPOI-R TI l OF THEl SECRETARYI OF TIIH E ARMY ONI CIVIL IW OIRKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 58. Includes $253,421,793 previous San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 59. Includes $964,114 previous San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 60. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 61. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 62. Includes $7,303,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek 63. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 64. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $267,840 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 65. See FY 1998 Annual Report for last full report. 34-20 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT .. .. . .II � I AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section in Text 1. Project and Work Authorized Date of Authorizing Act Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 HUMBOLDT HARBOR, CA Mar. 3, 1881 Channel 10 feet deep by 350 feet wide to be dredged along Eureka waterfront, thence 8 feet deep by 200 feet wide west to natural channel; dredging Mad River Shoal to 8 feet deep. Jul. 5, 1884 Construct South Jetty and continue channel improvements. Aug. 5, 1886 $75,000 continued improvement of Harbor with provision for title to 12 acres of land to be conveyed to the U.S. Jul. 3, 1892 Map and cost estimates for continuing Harbor improvements with provision for two parallel jetties. Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 25, 1910 Continuing Harbor improvements with provision for two parallel jetties. Rebuilding the jettles and channel improvements to Arcata and Hookton. Jul. 3, 1930 Eureka Channel 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide; Samoa Channel 20 feet deep and 250 feet wide; Arcata Channel 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide; Fields Landing Channel 20 feet deep and 250 feet wide. Aug. 30, 1935 Entrance Channel 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide. Aug. 26, 1937 Eureka Channel 26 feet deep and 400 feet wide; Samoa Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide; Fields Landing Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide; CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA A breakwater bearing S. 26-1/4 E. from Battery Point to Fauntleroy Rock and breakwater from the shore to Whaler Island. Modified condition of local cooperation which required that local interests construct a railroad from Grants Pass, Oregon to Crescent City so that a State Highway to Grants Pass would be an acceptable alternate. Extension of the breakwater to a length of 3,000 feet and a reduced cash contribution required of local interests. Maintaining by dredging of an outer harbor basin, 1,800 feet long, 1,400 feet wide and 20 feet deep, except in rock. Construction of a sand barrier from Whaler Island to the mainland and for maintenance dredging in the vicinity of the seaward end of the sand barrier. Extension of existing breakwater 2,700 feet to Round Rock (modified by Chief of Engineers, 1952). Construction of inner breakwater and removal of pinnacle rock and other material from the harbor to a depth of 12 feet and a harbor basin with a project depth of 10 feet. Extension of inner breakwater and dredging of T-shaped harbor basin to depth of 20 feet. 34-21 TABLE 34-B 2. -- Documents H. Doe. 434, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 67th Congress, 2nd sess. H. Doc. 595, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 74th Cong. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 688, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Report on file in office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 264, 89th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 59 Cong., 3rd sess. River & Harbor Approp Act of 1884 River & Harbor Approp Act of 1886 Chief of Engrs Annual Report (p.3120) Annual River & Harbor, Approp Acts 1892- 1899 H. Doc. 528, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 950, 60th Cong., 1st sess., H. Doc. 204, 61st, Cong., 2nd sess., H. Doe. 326, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 755, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 14 74th Cong.,lst sess Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doe. 11, 75th Cong., 1st REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 - II I- I I I I I I - I � II I I TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Turning Basin (off Fields Landing wharf) channel 26 feet deep, 600 feet wide and 800 feet long. Bar & Entrance Channel 40 feet deep, tapered from 1,600 feet to 500 feet wide; North Bay Channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; Eureka Channel 30 feet deep to mile 5.0; Samoa Channel 30 feet deep. North Bay Channel 35 feet deep; Samoa Channel 35 feet deep; widen turns at mile 0.75 and 2.6; provide a 1,200 by 1,200 foot anchorage in North Bay. Bar and Entrance Channel 48 feet deep; North Bay Channel, Samoa Channel and Samoa Turning Basin 38 feet deep; widen the north side of the Entrance Channel an additional 200 to 275 feet; relocate the southern edge of the Entrance Channel away from the South Jetty and to the north by 100 feet; and widen and realign the entrance to the Samoa Turning Basin. June 23, 1874 Jetties. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA June 25, 1910 North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Sep. 22, 1922 Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Jan. 21, 1927 2 Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Apr. 28, 1928 Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to nghtof- way for tidal canal. July 3, 1930 Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Mar. 2, 1945 Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Mar. 2, 1945 Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Oct. 23, 1962 3 Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; Jul. 16, 1952 August 1968 Oct. 12, 1996 34-22 sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doc. 143, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. 1996 WRDA, Public Law 104-303, Section 101 Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doec. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 407, 69t Cong., 1st sess. Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doec. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 3. ] t SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner Harbor. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Aug. 8, 1917 Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. July 3, 1930 A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Aug. 30, 1935 4 Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 6. Oct. 5, 1992 12. Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning basin at Terminal No. 1. Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo Bay north of Point San Pablo. Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities and reclamation of Reservation Point. West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)"). Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct 1,200 feet turning basin. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Restoration of tidal wetland on a 348-acre site using dredged material and construction of a replacement levee around the landward periphery of the site. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 73rd Cong., 1st sess., and 10, 74th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., 3rd. sess. H. Doc. 715, 76th Cong., 3rd. sess. H. Doc. 395, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 Section 106, 1992 WRDA, Public Law 102-580 H. Doec. 545, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act 34-23 4. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CA Jun. 30, 1948 Floodwalls and channel improvements along 3,600 feet of the Petaluma River and tributaries. Jan. 24, 2000 Provide a 100-year level of flood protection to the city of Petaluma. May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. Sec. 823, 1986 WRDA Flood Control Act of 1948, Public Law 80-858, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 2000 WRDA, Publig Law 106-541, 106 Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 404, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA SAN PEDRO CREEK, PACIFICA, CA Jun. 30, 1948 Channel realignment and wetland restoration. Flood Control Act of 1948, Public Law 80-858, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-24 12. 14. 15. _ SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA ' Completed 1966 $ 155,550 2 $104,699 9 Berkeley Marina, CA ' Completed 1979 505,201 ' Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 2,016,547 s San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 156,995 " San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 6 97,513 10 San Ieandro Marina (Breakwater), CA' Completed 1976 210,390 8 148,785 12 Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 131,409 '3 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. Public Law 86-645). 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. excludes contributed funds $138,189. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 9. Includes $104,699 for jetty condition surveys for 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administration FY 1987-2000. funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) placed 10. Includes $97,513 for reconnaissance and inactive 1974. The barrier groin and sandtrap feature of condition survey for FY 1990-2000. the project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by 11. Includes $156,995 for reconnaissance and WRDA of 1986. condition survey for FY 1994-2000. 5. Includes $562,313 for reconnaissance and 12. Includes $148,785 for reconnaissance and condition survey for FY 1956-2000. condition survey through FY 2000. 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and 13. Includes $61,244 for reconnaissance and excludes contributed funds $153,618. condition survey through FY 2000. TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) San ablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) Santa Cruz County, CA 1958 1935 1974 1981 1981 1962 1982 1966 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Aug. 5, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Jan. 1, 1990 $ 2,000 245,639 34-25 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 II I- I- I- I I _ I I I I I II TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Dates of Inspection Alameda Creek Corte Madera Creek Coyote Creek, Marin County Coyote Creek, Santa Clara County Dry Creek East Weaver Creek Eel River at Sandy Prairie Guadalupe River Klamath River Mad River at Blue Lake Pajaro River, Monterey County Pajaro River, Santa Cruz County Pinole Creek Redwood Creek Rheem Creek Rodeo Creek Russian River, Mendocino County Russian River, Sonoma County San Leandro San Lorenzo Creek San Lorenzo River San Pablo Creek Uvas Creek Wildcat Creek May 2000 May 2000 May 2000 Sep 2000 Aug 2000 Jun 2000 Jun 2000 Jul 2000 Jun 2000 Jun 2000 Apr 2000 Apr 2000 Apr 2000 Jun 2000 Apr 2000 Apr 2000 Jun 2000 Jun 2000 May 2000 Apr 2000 Jul 2000 Apr 2000 Jul 2000 Aug 2000 34-26 Location -- - SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-I RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 Total $273,676,000 109,375,000 $ 383,051,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of completed projects. storage is initiated and inclusive of lands and damages. 2. Reimbursements by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to TABLE 34-J RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COST (See Section 15 of Text) Height of Nearest City Distance Height of Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Dam (Acre-Ft) Cost Tvype Coyote Valley Dam Mile 0.8 East Fork 160 Feet- Mendocino) Ukiah of Russian River Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,000 Channel Improvements (East Fork) Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East Fork below Coyote Valley Dam 24,484,000 and lower 98 miles of Mile 0 to 98, Russian Russian River Guernville River - 319 Feet- Dry Creek (Warm Springs Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek Earthfill 181,000 363,017,000 Channel Improvements (Dry Creek) below Dry Creek (Warm Springs Dam) Healdsburg Mile I to 14.4 Dry Creek - - 2,864,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 34-27 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT* This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA.................................. 35-2 2. Sacramento River, Deep Water Ship Channel, CA........ .......... ...................... 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ..................... ................. 35-4 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................................. 35-4 Flood Control 5. American River Watershed, CA (Common Features) .................. .......... 35-6 6. American River (Natomas) .................... 35-6 7. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ..................... ......... 35-5 8. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA .................. 35-6 9. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake And Farmington Dam, CA ............................ 35-7 10. Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO ......... 35-8 11.Corte Madera Creek, CA ..... ...................... 35-9 12. Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA ........... 35-9 13. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ................... 35-10 14. Guadalupe River, CA ................................... 35-11 15. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ................ ........................ 35-11 16. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA .................. 35-12 17. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA..........35-14 18. Little Dell Lake, UT ..................................... 35-15 19. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek NV and CA .................................................. 35-16 20. Merced County Streams, CA.....................35-17 21. Merced County Stream Group, CA...... 35-18 22. Napa River, CA .............................. 35-18 23. Pajaro River, CA ...................... 35-19 24. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ............ 35-19 25. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ............ 35-21 26. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA .......... 35-22 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 27. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ................ 35-23 28.San Lorenzo, CA ................................... 35-25 29. Upper Jordan, UT..................................... 35-26 30. Walnut Creek, CA........................................35-27 31. West Sacramento, CA .............................. 35-28 32. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA............35-29 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.......................................... 35-30 34. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization . ..................................................... 3 5-30 35. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............................... 35-31 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 36. New Melones Lake, CA ............................... 35-31 General Investigation 37. Surveys ........................ ................ ........... 35-32 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............. 35-32 39. Research and Development..........................35-33 40. Preconstruction Engineering & Design........35-33 41. Other Work under Special Authority ......... 35-34 Tables Page Table 35-A Cost and Financial Statement ............................ 35-38 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation .......................... 35-49 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.............35-52 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 35-53 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 35-56 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing ............................... 35-57 Table 35-1 San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work For Projects ......................... 35-57 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost ........................ 35-58 Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, CA, Maximum Inflow, Storage, And Outflow for Projects ...... 35-58 Table 35-L Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work ............... 35-59 Table 35-M Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs .................. 35-59 Table 35-N Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville To Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded From Cost Estimate ............... 35-60 Table 35-0 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville To Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs ...................................... 35-60 Table 35-P Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant To Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ............. 35-61 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Table 35-Q Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303 .......................... 35-61 Table 35-R Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act Public Law 83-790 ......... 35-62 Table 35-S Surveys .................................. 35-62 Table 35-T Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection .............. 35-62 Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local Interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to Red Bluff(including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. The project is located on the Sacramento River, between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of approximately 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contract Costa, Solano and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Existing waterways are inadequate to efficiently accommodate vessels currently using the channel. Because of the depth restriction, only 20% of the world's fleet can currently load to full design depth. Once deepened, the Port of Sacramento will be able to accommodate 70% of the world's fleet at full design draft. The project plan is to deepen the existing 30 feet Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel from N.Y. Slough to the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, to 35 feet, and widen the channel as necessary. The project provides for establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for such losses. Recreation was also authorized although no local sponsor has been identified. Current project estimate is $50,000,000 and is comprised of Federal cost (Corps) of $24,900,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard-for navigation aids) of $300,000 and non-Federal cost of $24,800,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed with the local sponsor, the Port of Sacramento, in June 1986. A modification to the LCA, necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, was executed in December 1988. The local sponsor will provide lands, easements, rights of way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction. 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 costs total $9,475. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three facilities are owned by the City of Sacramento and the rest are privately owned; all are privately operated. For full description, see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986". Deepwater terminal facilities are comprised of wharves, piers, administration and storage buildings and belt railroad facilities. The majority of these facilities are owned and operated by the Sacramento-Yolo Port District and the rest are privately owned and operated. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Historical summary. Funds to initiate preconstruction planning were appropriated in fiscal year 1982. Project construction was authorized by the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 and modified by the WRDA 1986. The General Design Memorandum was approved and the Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. The modified LCA was executed in December 1988. The first construction contract for deepening was awarded in February 1989 and completed in July 1990. A second construction contract was awarded in September 1990 and completed in August 1991. Construction from River Mile 43 to River Mile 35 has been completed. In fiscal year 1996, the sponsor requested indefinite suspension of the project due to their inability to meet their cost share requirements. Based on Congressional direction in Conference Report 105-749, dated September 25, 1998, the Corps has developed a study plan outlining the scope, schedule and costs to prepare a Engineering Documentation Report (EDR). This preliminary assessment has been submitted to the sponsor for their review and a determination will be made as to proceeding with the EDR. This plan, together with the sponsor's financing plan, will serve as the basis for requesting additional Federal funds for costs associated with the EDR. Section 305 of WRDA 2000 "authorized credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the dredged material from the project that is purchased by public agencies or nonprofit entities..." Operations during fiscal year. Completed the study plan and continued project coordination. Fiscal Year 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Reported on by the San Francisco District. Refer to Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-1 for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassified and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., Ist sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, improvement No. 3 and San Francisco District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous Flood Control 5. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED, (Common Features) Location. The project is located in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties on the North, Middle and South Forks of the American River and along the lower American River and Sacramento Rivers. Existing Project. Recent evaluations indicate that the level of flood protection along much of the American River and in the Natomas area is less than the 100-year level. The project consists of levee improvements including a slurry wall along 21 miles of the lower American River, levee modifications along 12 miles of the Sacramento River, telemetered gages above Folsom Dam, improving the flood warning system for the lower American River, installing a closure structure at Mayhew Drain, 3 miles of levee modifications along lower American River, and levee modifications along 10 miles of the Natomas Cross Canal. Cost estimate (October 2000) is $96,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $72,200,000 is Federal cost and $23,800,000 is non-Federal cost (which includes $17,670,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing requirements specified in Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, and pay 18 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, and bear all inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Dredging was initiated and completed at contract cost of $2,870,625. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non- Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project cooperation agreement (PCA) was signed July 13, 1998. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract for levee improvements along the right bank of the lower American River continued with a fiscal year cost of $8,120,000. Construction contracts were awarded for levee improvements along the left bank of the lower American River with a fiscal year cost of $4,436,000. Remaining fiscal year cost of $4,365,000 was for associated engineering and design and construction management costs. Historical summary. The Defense Appropriations Act for FY 1993 authorized construction of the Natomas feature of the project, which includes levee improvements around the perimeter of the Natomas basin, a 300-acre detention area in North Natomas, and recreation trails. The local sponsor has already constructed much of the project. Federal Construction General funds were appropriated in FY 1998 to initiate reimbursement to the sponsor for the Federal share of the project. Initial reimbursement of $15 million was made to the sponsor in September 1999. The Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1993 also directed the Corps to reevaluate other features recommended in the Feasibility Report and a Supplemental Information Report (SIR) was completed in March 1996. The Chief of Engineer's Report recommended implementation of elements common to the final candidate plans presented in the SIR. These "common elements" were authorized for construction in WRDA 96 and Federal Construction General funds were appropriated in FY 1998 for initiation of construction. Sec. 366 of WRDA 99 authorized additional levee improvements as part of the overall project. 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 6. AMERICA RIVER, CA (Natomas) See PED's 35-30 7. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "'H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 129,189 acre-feet occurred May 29, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 7,467 cubic feet per second on February 14, 2000. Maximum release of 437 cubic feet per second on March 7, 2000, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 53,871 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control purposes totaled 11,470 acre-feet. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances was combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase 11 was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 198 1. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program was initiated in FY 1989. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 8. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN) Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1999) for existing project is $26,950,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $16,860,000 is Federal and $10,090,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,340,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., I st sess, contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which $1,340,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Levee repair contract was awarded in August 1996. Cache Creek Settling Basin work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance in December 1993. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) construction contract was awarded August 5, 1991, completed in September 1993, and work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on December 2, 1993. 9. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $ i 5,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; a long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. Local interests paid $4,973,499 through December 31,2000. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek Diversion was 1,088 cubic feet per second on February 12, 2000. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 680 cubic feet per second on February 12, 2000. Maximum flow of Duck Creek near Farmington was 2,102 cubic feet per second on February 15, 2000. Maximum storage in reservoir was 19,414 acre-feet on February 15, 2000, and maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 10,013 cubic feet per second on February 12, 2000. Maximum release of 1,968 cubic feet per second on February 24, 2000, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 73,795 acre-feet was released for flood control. New Hogan Lake Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 221,231 acre-feet occurred February 15, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 13,762 cubic feet per second on January 25, 2000. Maximum release of 3,690 cubic feet per second on February 15, 2000, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 72,336 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Release for flood control purposes amounted to 109,950 acre-feet. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. See page measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 10. COLORADO RIVER AT GRAND JUNCTION, CO Location. On north bank of Colorado River from 9th Street west to the Denver Rio Grande Western Railroad Bridge at city of Grand Junction, CO, in Mesa County. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 3,200 foot levee located on north side of Colorado River, one road ramp over levee for accessing Watson Island, 3 detention basins, a relief well system and a 550-foot-long impermeable blanket to prevent seepage though railroad embankment. Estimated cost (September 1994) is $1,651,200, of which $1,086,700 is Federal cost and $564,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $63,000. Existing project was approved by Chief of Engineers on February 28, 1994, under provisions of section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local sponsor shall furnish to the Government all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT areas, as determined by the Government to be necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, and shall furnish to the Government evidence supporting local sponsor's legal authority to grant rights-of-entry to such lands. Necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way may be provided incrementally, but all lands, easements, and rights-of-way determined by the Government to be necessary for work to be performed under a construction contract must be furnished prior to advertisement of the construction contract. Local sponsor shall provide or pay to the Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins that may be required at any dredged material disposal areas necessary for project construction. Upon notification from the Government, local sponsor shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction. Local sponsor shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, as amended by Title IV of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-17), and the Uniform Regulations contained in 49 CFR Part 24, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. Local sponsor shall provide such documentation as contracting officer requires to demonstrate compliance. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Department of the Army and the City of Grand Junction, CO, was signed April 8, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. O&M Manual and As-Built drawings were finalized. Project audit, close-out activities and fiscal completion continued. Historical summary. Plans and specifications were completed in August 1994. Non-Federal cash contribution of $63,000 for construction was received September 27, 1994. First construction contract in amount of $575,830 was awarded September 30, 1994. 11. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Reported on by San Francisco District. Refer to Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1996. 12. COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Location. Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combinedplan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. Estimated cost (October 1998) for the Coyote Creek element of the existing project is $61,750,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $30,890,000 is Federal and $30,860,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,100,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Estimated cost (October 1998) for the Berryessa Creek element of the existing project is $16,525,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $12,425,000 is Federal and $4,100,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,830,000 cash contribution). Existing project was authorized under Section 101 (a)(5) of WRDA 1990, Public Law 101-640 (HD 101-126, 101st Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. (Coyote Creek) Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 areas, which may be reduced for credit allowed based on prior work (Sec. 104 of WRDA 86 ($8,633,000), Sec. 26 of WRDA 88 (not to exceed $3,000,000) and Sec. 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (not to exceed $3,000,000) after reductions for such credit have been made in the required cash payments; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, and perform prior work under Sec. 104 of WRDA 86, Sec. 26 of WRDA 88, and Sec. 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968, where necessary for the construction of the project; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $8,280,000 for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs (Sec. 103 of WRDA 86). (Berryessa Creek) Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; and pay 1 I percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Coyote Creek mitigation contract continued at a fiscal year cost of $162,711. Historical summary. Separate General Design Memorandums were prepared for Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. General Design Memorandum for Coyote was submitted in May 1993. Local interests have completed construction of Reach I (Sec 104, Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), Reach 2 (Sec 26, WRDA) and Reach 3A (Sec 215, WRDA). National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1994 directed the Secretary of the Army to construct project notwithstanding sec 902, WRDA. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in September 1994. Coyote Creek Reach 3B construction contract was completed at a final cost of $5,308,925. Preconstruction engineering and design cost is $4,410,000. Total reimbursement of $7,400,000 for costs in excess of 50% maximum requirement and credit payments of $14,633,000 for prior integral work, have been made to the local sponsor as of September 30, 1997. 13. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996, p.35- 8. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (Sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project close-out activities were on-going. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was transferred to local interests in November 1988; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 1990; and Laurel Creek Diversion, Phase IIA, was transferred to local interests in December 1990 for maintenance. Channel improvement contract for Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, was completed and transferred to local interests in December 1991 for maintenance. Mitigation planting on Ledgewood Creek was completed in April 1993; maintenance inspection has been completed. Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was completed and transferred to local interests on July 8, 1993. 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 14. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Location. On Guadalupe River in downtown area of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for widening and deepening one or more sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as necessary. Non-Federal sponsor must pay 100 percent of incremental construction cost of locally preferred plan. Project is an integral component of a much larger regional park plan being undertaken by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. Estimated cost (October 1997) is $182,800,000 (which includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $78,500,000 is Federal and $104,300,000 is non-Federal including reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 which directed the Secretary of the Army to construct the project notwithstanding Sec. 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding project cost limitations, and Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1992 which directed the Secretary of the Army to modify and construct the project in accordance with the January 1991 GDM; it is consistent with the Guadalupe River Park plan requested by the local sponsor and with cost sharing policy. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit ($5,701,000) allowed for prior work (Sec. 104, Water Resources Development Act of 1986); credit was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Federal reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency requested modification of project to include recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to participate as local sponsor for recreation. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract No. 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue), was completed with fiscal year cost of $257,000 (Interstate 880 to Hedding Street). Fiscal year mitigation costs included Early Plant collection for Contract 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue) of $15,000 and River Street Historic Salvage and Demolition $560,000.. Historical summary. Final General Design Memorandum (GDM) reflecting locally preferred plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision of GDM to address comments was completed in July 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Construction contract No. I for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was awarded August 10, 1992; and was essentially completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on August 11, 1994. Construction contract No. 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue) was awarded July 8, 1994, and was essentially completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on October 25, 1996. 15. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., Ist sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. RunoffofFresno River below Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 66,465 acre-feet occurred April 23, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 5,021 cubic feet per second on February 14, 2000. Maximum release of 618 cubic feet per second on February 29, 2000, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 59,556 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes and 21,240 acre-feet was released for flood control. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the recreation areas in FY 1984. 16. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) In 1991, Isabella Lake and 16,000 acres of surrounding land was transferred to the Forest Service in exchange for about 2,500 acres of Forest Service land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreation purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps on May 15, 1991, in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. This was accomplished by using a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. Authority for new concessionaire operating permits to be issued, as well as those previously granted by the Corps, will be transferred to the Forest Service. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and $55,443) were received in 1990; $60,983 was received in 1991; $65,975 in October 1991 (FY 1992) $77,577 in October 1992 (FY 1993), and $62,231 in October 1993 (FY 1994). Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1995, amounted to $2,150,458. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 293,316 acre-feet occurred June 8, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 7,142 cubic feet per second on April 28, 2000, and maximum outflow of 1,751 cubic feet per second occurred July 15, 2000. During the year, 461,796 acre-feet was released for irrigation and 0 acrefeet was released for flood control. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) was used. The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. 17. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31,2000: Terminus, $2,438,709 and Success, $1,209,073. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $118,300. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 143,844 acre-feet occurred on May 28, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir on February 14, 2000, was about 6,460 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 2,234 cubic feet per second occurred May 28, 2000. Irrigation and spreading releases totaled 278,312 acre-feet. Releases for flood control totaled 82,700 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Relief wells were placed at a fiscal year cost of $120,000. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was above normal during the year. Maximum storage of 73,335 acre-feet occurred on May 31,2000. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 4,666 cubic feet per second on February 14, 2000, and maximum outflow of 643 feet per second occurred on July 25, 2000. Irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 86,055 acre-feet. Releases for flood control amounted to 16,300 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were survey was completed in FY 1984. 18. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., Ist sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Recreation was reactivated in 1995 and the Recreation DM approved in 1996. The project includes an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (September 1997) is $65,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $41,215,000 is Federal and $24,085,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of$19,955,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $19,995,000. By letters of January 22 1986, and January 24,1986. The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (Sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of$14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (Sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989 and completed in September 1993. Project was transferred to the local sponsor for maintenance and operation on March 26, 1993. Dam was dedicated on August 5, 1993. 19. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 1,372 acre-feet occurred on February 15, 2000. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 483 cubic feet per second on February 14, 2000, and maximum outflow of 85 cubic feet per second occurred February 18, 2000. During the year, 4,912 acre-feet was released for irrigation purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 11,927 acre-feet. Piezometers were replaced at a fiscal year cost of $27,000. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 20. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of one new reservoir Haystack Mountain and enlargement of four existing reservoirs Bums, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, Bums, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Bums projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act. Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Mariposa reservoir and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Estimated total project cost (October 1996) is $132,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $91,800,000 is Federal and $40,900,000 is non-Federal (which includes a $6,855,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $282,000, of which $240,000 is a cash contribution and $42,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $5,230,000 and includes cash contribution of $595,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (Sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The California Reclamation Board, the Merced County Board of Supervisors and the city of Merced have indicated support for balance of the project by letters of intent dated August 29, 1991 and August 20, 1991, respectively. This support was again reaffirmed in letters of support as provided by the California Reclamation Board on January 9, 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued for Bear Creek Dam Unit. Castle was transferred to sponsor for maintenance and operation in April 1995. Historical summary. Castle Dam multicomponent construction contract was awarded February 26, 1991, and construction was completed in March 1993. Castle 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Dam check structure contract was initiated in April 1993 and completed in January 1994. Castle Dam was transferred to the sponsor on April 12, 1995, and accepted by the sponsor in FY 2000. 21. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas below Merced County stream group reservoirs was above normal for the year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Bums, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 22. NAPA RIVER, CA Location. The project is located in the city and county of Napa, California. The Napa River drainage basin, comprising 426 square miles, is just north of San Pablo Bay and approximately 40 miles northeast of San Francisco, California. Existing project. A major portion of the presently developed area of the city is located in a high flood hazard area and is subject to flooding. The project consists of modifications to provide the project area with 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek. Channel modifications include overbank excavation, vertical walls, floodwalls, levees, bridges, pumping stations and flowage easements. The project also includes recreation trails and incidental ecosystem restoration. Current total project cost estimate is $182,000,000 and is to be cost shared 50% Federal and 50% local sponsor. Local cooperation. In March 1998, the Napa County electorate passed "Measure A" to fund the non- Federal share of the project. In June 1999, Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the local sponsor, indicated support for the project and intent to cost share. The sponsor will furnish lands, easements, rights of way and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary for the construction of the project; provide 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement for flood control facilities; and pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation (except recreational navigation) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement or recreation facilities. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in February 2000. 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. The PED phase of the project was completed in fiscal year 2000 at a total cost of$15,587,000. Construction Contract 1A, estimated at $2,550,000, was awarded in July 2000. Planning, engineering and design, construction management and non-Federal lands certification efforts continue. Fiscal Year construction costs total $2,853,452. Historical summary. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965 for flood control and recreation and was modified by the Flood Control Act of 1976 to include modifications to Napa Creek. The project was placed in inactive status in 1978. Following severe flooding in February 1986, the sponsor requested reactivation of the project. Funds to resume preconstruction engineering and design (PED) were appropriated in fiscal year 1989. A revised Final SGDM was completed in October 1998 and approved in May 1999. The ROD for the revised SEIS/EIR was issued in June 1999. Project was approved as new start construction for fiscal year 2000. 23. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996, pg. 35-15. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is fiscally completed. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Construction began in October 1987. Construction for the first contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge), second contract (levee work and hiking trails), and third and final contract (landscaping) has been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Total reimbursement of $5,583,369 has been made to the local sponsor. 24. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Project also includes 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its tributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $14,450,234 for irrigation services through December 31, 1999. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng- 1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2741, effective September 25, 1979, was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Kings River Conservation District for hydropower development at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam. Payment to the Department of the Army for construction and installation of the penstocks in the amount of $1,044,685 was made to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury in November 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $18,235. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 956,054 acre-feet occurred on June 5, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 13,490 cubic feet per second on May 24, 2000, and maximum outflow of 7,035 cubic feet per second occurred on June 30, 2000. During the year, 1,495,531 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. There was no release for flood control. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Pine Flat Lake acquired additional acreage as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The Corps exchanged Isabella Lake and the 16,000 acres around that lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. 25. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno- Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The Authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $73,710,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $47,460,000 is Federal and $26,250,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,670,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $3.680,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities, real estate crediting, and project auditing were continued. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction contract for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek Detention Basin was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam awarded May 23, 1990, was completed and transferred to local 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 interests for operation and maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was awarded March 18, 1992. Big Dry Creek Dam and Pup Creek Detention Basin were transferred to local interests on June 22, 1994. Last piece of completed work, Alluvial Drain Detention Basin, was transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on July 18, 1994. 26. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. The Gualala Redwoods claim that their access to Kelly Road was cut off by Corps project (Warm Springs) went to trial in October 1992. Judgement resulting was a cost of $3,162,000 to the Federal Government. Major items of contract work included: Completion of Liberty Glen wastewater system at fiscal year cost of $353,795 and initiation and completion of contaminated soil remediation, $83,000. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $14,327. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 92,670 acre-feet occurred on May 15, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 4,701 cubic feet per second on February 13, 2000. Maximum release of 4,412 cubic 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT feet per second occurred on February 16, 2000. During the year, 83,718 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 122,480 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 270,139 acre-feet occurred February 15, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 8,196 cubic feet per second on February 14, 2000. Maximum release of 4,079 cubic feet per second occurred February 10, 1999. During the year, 64,524 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 103,179 acre-feet. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase 1, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 27. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1997) first cost for project is $249,400,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $179,900,000 is Federal and $69,500,000 non-Federal comprised of lands and damages including relocations $26,671,000 and required cash contribution $42,829,000 toward first cost. Total estimated cost for recreation facilities, $2,874,000 (includes both Federal and non-Federal). Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported on page 35-3A under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $27,740,000. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash, that when added to the cost of lands easement, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equal one-quarter of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $40,970,000, First phase mitigation equals thirty-seven percent for acquisition of land and establishment and maintenance of fish and wildlife habitat, this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $790,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries None. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project Complete Contract LAR 2, Site 5, Phase 2 in December 1999 at a cost of $677,381. Awarded Contract 42D,. RD 108-Colusa Basin in August 2000. Engineering and design efforts continue. Fiscal Year costs total $4,573,226. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. None. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 128,279 acre-feet occurred May 26, 2000. Maximum hourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 11,008 cubic feet per second on February 14, 2000, and maximum outflow of 5,577 cubic feet per second occurred on February 22, 2000. During the year, 189,986 acre-feet was released for flood control and 155,167 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required, which will accomplish under Sacramento River Bank Protection project. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: First phase (pre-Separable Element 38B and second phase (SE 38BSE42) have 767,000 linear feet complete. SE 40,41,42 and 43 have 68,000 linear feet remaining. LCAs were executed for SE 41 in August 1988, for SE38B, 40 and 42 in December 1988 and for first phase mitigation in June 1990. Contract LAR 1A l, Site 3 was awarded in August 1996 and completed in December 1996. Contract LAR 1A2, Site 3 (River Park) was awarded in June 1997 and completed in February 1998. Steamboat Slough contract was awarded in September 1997 and completed in November 1997. Contract LAR 1A3, Site (River Park) was awarded in November 1997 and completed in May 1999. Contract for LARIB, Sites 1, 2, and 4 was awarded July 1998 and completed in December 1999. Contract LAR 2, Site 5, Phase I was awarded in January 1999 and completed in March 1999. Contract LAR 2, Site 5, Phase 2 was awarded on August and completed in December 1999. Overall project is about 91 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama Countyone site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 28. SAN LORENZO, CA Location. Project is located within the city limits of 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Santa Cruz, CA, in Santa Cruz County, about 70 miles south of city of San Francisco and includes the lower 2.5 miles of San Lorenzo River which terminates at the Pacific Ocean. Existing Project. Flood control features of the authorized project consist of construction of 13,000 1.f. of levee embankment raise or floodwalls on top of various portions of the existing project levees on both sides of San Lorenzo River from the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge to Highway 1. Habitat restoration measures include revegetating the land-side slopes of the levees. The maximum flood of record occurred in 1955 which inundated 410 acres and caused damages of approximately $7.6 million. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for flood control and habitat restoration purposes. Streambank erosion control was added to the project under the Water Resources Development Act of 1999. Cost estimate (October 2000) is $26,600,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $22,000,000 is Federal cost and $7,100,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay 14 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of costs to 25 percent, as determined under Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to reflect the non- Federal sponsor's ability to pay as reduced for credit allowed based on prior work ($150,000 authorized under Section 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968); pay 9 percent of the costs allocated to fish and wildlife habitat restoration to bring the total non-Federal share of habitat restoration costs to 25 percent, as determined under Section 103 (m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to reflect the non-Federal sponsor's ability to pay as reduced for credit allowed based on prior work ($400,000 authorized under Section 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968), and bear all costs of operations, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities. Pay 35 percent of the costs allocated to stream bank erosion control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of stream bank erosion control features of the project, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement. Local sponsor, City of Santa Cruz, expressed their continued support for project by letter dated October 8, 1997. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed October 15, 1998. Operations and results during fiscal year. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997 provided initial construction funds of $200,000. Engineering and design continued, including revisions of plans and specifications to incorporate habitat restoration features into project. Construction General funds were used for fiscal year costs of $820,000. Historical summary. A flood control project, consisting of levee and channel improvements, was completed in 1959 by the Corps of Engineers. The project was to provide a standard project flood level of protection (about a 200-year event). Since that time, excessive sediment deposition in the streambed has reduced the flood carrying capacity of the existing project. Sediment accumulation and the resultant peak flows during a flood event in January 1982 caused the river to flow near design capacity, even though the storm had a recurrence level of only approximately 25- years. As a result of the flood threat, the City of Santa Cruz and the Corps of Engineers initiated a feasibility study of the San Lorenzo River with the signing of a final Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) on August 18, 1989. Chief's Report was signed June 30, 1994. Preconstruction engineering and design phase was initiated in March 1994 and completed at a cost of $934,000. Streambank erosion control requires an amendment to the PCA. A schedule is being prepared for a Limited Evaluation Report and associated environmental documentations, as well as execution of the PCA amendment. Budget policy considers this to be treated as a separable element and compete for a "new start" construction in FY 03. 29. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UT Location. Project is located in Salt Lake County, Utah just south of Salt Lake City corporate limit. 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Existing Project. The project includes construction of a flood control diversion and sediment control structure on Mill Creek, a 1.4 mile underground conduit from the diversion structure to a detention basin, and construction of a 100 acre foot Hillview Detention Basin. The project will divert flood flows from Mill Creek to the detention basin and ultimately into Big Cottonwood Creek. The project will provide 100 year flood protection on Mill Creek above State Street. Local Cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas. Modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project. Pay 6 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Salt Lake County will act as the local sponsor for the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement is pending completion of a limited reevaluation report (LRR) and required funding. Operations and results during fiscal year. PED was completed at a cost of $1,576,000. At the request of Salt Lake County, the design is being reevaluated to address potential downsizing of the diversion structure and other project features. Results of the reevaluation will be presented in the LRR. Historical Summary. A feasibility report was completed in 1987 and PED was completed in December 1994. Funds were added in FY 1997 to initiate construction. There has been a long history of flooding which is most commonly associated with snowmelt. The most recent flooding occurred in 1982, 1983, and 1984. A General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in December 1994. A project Authorization Change (PAC) report was submitted in January 1996 to obtain Congressional reauthorization on a Section 902 (WRDA 86) new cost limit. The project was reauthorized in WRDA 96. 30. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about I mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1996) is $97,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $71,900,000 is Federal cost and $25,200,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $19,360,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,840,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., Ist sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1992) at $5,840,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 needed for future construction. The Flood Control District arrange d for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization Change for recreation was approved July 27, 1987. In 1995, the city of Walnut Creek, decided not to proceed with the recreation project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 98 percent complete. Total of 17.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. I and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 1, Contract No. 2 and Contract No. 3 and Upper Pine Creek Channel contact have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Due to difficulties with Contract No. I part of the contract work was completed under Contract No. 1A with a different contractor. A contract for remedial work on San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 2 channel cover was completed in August 1993. The 9-acre mitigation contract was completed in June 1993. Work remaining consists of completion of erosion control mitigation (8-acre Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 31. WEST SACRAMENTO, CA Location. Project is located in West Sacramento, Yolo County, in north-central California. Existing Project. Project consists of raising 4.9 miles of levees up to 5.0 feet along the Sacramento and Yolo Bypasses; constructing 0.9 miles of slurry cut-off wall approximately 50 feet deep at the waterside toe along the east levee of the Yolo Bypass extending into the south levee of the Sacramento Bypass; constructing concrete wing walls with stop logs at the Union Pacific Railroad; constructing a concrete wing wall and flow cut-off wall on each side of Interstate 80; and developing approximately 40 acres of mitigation lands for riparian and upland habitat loss. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1992. Project was reauthorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (P.L. 105-245) Estimated cost (October 1999) is $22,800,000 with a Federal cost of $1,710,000 and a non-Federal cost of $5,700,000 which includes a cash contribution of $2,720,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay 12 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the local sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, was executed in May 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued, including revisions of plans and specifications. First construction contract in the amount of $5,217,225 was awarded June 19, 1998. Work began on the second contract which was awarded September 30, 1999. Fiscal year costs were $2,911,110 (Federal) and $297,663 (non-Federal contributed funds). Historical summary. Funds were appropriated in FY 1992 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for the combined American River Watershed and Sacramento Metropolitan studies. The two projects were separated when WRDA 92 authorized the West Sacramento Project (Sacramento Metropolitan) independently of the American River Watershed Project. Funds to initiate construction for the West Sacramento Project were appropriated in FY 1995. Design Memorandum was approved in March 1996. PED was completed at a cost of $1,847,000. 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 32. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement reflects only Reach 1, which is from San Pablo Bay to AT&SF Railroad tracks on both Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks; Reach I consists of 9,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 10,000 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 20 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Reach 2, which is upstream of AT&SF Railroad tracks and consists of 9,400 lineal feet of channel and levee work on Wildcat Creek, 1,800 lineal feet of channel and levee work on San Pablo Creek, and mitigation for fish and wildlife on 8 acres, was determined to be economically infeasible, excluded from total project cost, and reclassified as inactive. Project also includes recreation features on Wildcat Creek. Approved estimated cost of new work (1996) is $35,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $20,200,000 is Federal cost, and $15,000,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,593,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of flood control project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of Sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and construction continued. Historical summary. Contact 3C completed. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design Memorandum was approved on February 19, 1992, and the recreation LCA was signed on April 15, 1992. Construction work under Contract No. I and Contract No. 2 for Reach No. I of Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks has been transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance. In March 1990, Reach 2 was declared 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 infeasible and is now inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Flood control construction of the project is about 100 percent complete. Final accounting of project is underway. Recreation features are 50 percent complete. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, and Fancher Dam and Redbank, Alluvial Drain and Pup Creek detention basins, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of Sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and Sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $169,800. 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $627,038. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration activities pursuant to sec 206, Public Law 303, 104 'h Congress. Cost for studies for fiscal year were $858,586. See Table Q for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $16,080,219, $342,200 was for disaster preparedness and $15,738,019 for emergency flood repairs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $19,960,494, $19,935,208 was for emergency operations and $25,286 for emergency streambank and shoreline protection. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $251,722 all of which was used for snagging and clearing activities. See Table R for list of studies. 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Flood insurance activities (Sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, four flood insurance studies were continued. Inter-Agency Agreements EMW-96-1A-0294, EMW-96-1A-0195- FEMA, EMW-96-IA-0195, and EMW-97-IA-0140, at a fiscal year cost of $101,670 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 35. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Jordanelle, Little Dell, Lost Creek, Pineview, Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, Ridgway, and Vallecito, CO, were prepared. No water control manual revisions were completed due to environmental issues. Corps personnel provided advice Sec. 7 as requested during flood control operations at all c. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $1,798,700. Total cost to September 30, 2000, was $14,788,982. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 36. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Estimated (October 1996 price level) Federal cost is $402,000,000. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 3 1.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project close-out and flowage easement acquisition along the Lower Stanislaus River were continued. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. Boundary fencing, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities, McHenry recreation area, Tuttletown wastewater treatment, Knights Ferry recreation area, Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system, Two-Mile Bar recreation, administration building, and Glory Hole recreation area force main contracts have been completed. Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification (Nov 93), Widening Highway 49 Intersection (Aug 94); Tuttletown Recreation Campgrounds, and Tuttletown and Glory Hole Improvement (Jan 94) have been completed. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99.9 percent complete. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS See Table 35-S. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $277,306. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $25,143. 39. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979. In the reorganization of CEIWR, beginning in FY 2001 appropriations and costs will be reported in CEIWR's database not Sacramento District. Sacramento District will continue to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,995,700, of which $347,964 was for collection and study of basic data (including flood plain management service), $1,361,000 was for research and development, and $287,468 was for operation and maintenance activities. 40. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED, CA (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) The projects are located in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties on the North, Middle and South Forks of the American River and along the lower American River and Sacramento Rivers. Recent evaluations indicate that the level of flood protection along much of the American River and in the Natomas area is less than the 100-year level. The Supplemental Information Report (SIR) was completed in March 1996 as directed by the Defense Appropriations act for FY 1993. The Chief of Engineer's Report recommended implementation of elements common to the final candidate plans presented in the SIR. These "common elements", were authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996. Other alternatives addressed in the SIR include: Folsom outlet modifications, Folsom Dam raising, downstream levee raising along the American and Sacramento Rivers, and upstream storage. Efforts are being continued to define plans for alternatives leading to higher levels of flood protection for the Sacramento area and vicinity. The Feasibility Report for the American River Watershed Investigation was completed in December 1991 and the Division Engineer's Report was issued in February 1992. Funds were appropriated in FY 1992 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for the combined American River Watershed and Sacramento Metropolitan studies. The two projects were separated when WRDA 92 authorized the American River Watershed Project independently of the West Sacramento Project (Sacramento Metropolitan). Sec. 566 of WRDA 99 directed additional flood control studies for: (a) increasing surcharge flood control storage at Folsom Dam and Reservoir, and (b) increased flood protection through levee modifications on the American and Sacramento Rivers, and directed the Corps to submit a report to Congress by March 2000 documenting results of the studies. The Corps completed an interim report in January 2000. Sec. 101 of WRDA 99 authorized the Folsom Dam Modifications project as described in the Supplemental Information Report dated March 1996, as modified by the report entitled "Folsom Dam Modification Report, New Outlets Plan," dated March 1998, prepared by the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, at an estimated cost of $150,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $97,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $52,500,000. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $28,600,000. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County, NV. Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a detention dam on Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough, and the North 35-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. Project was deferred and preconstruction planning had been terminated as project is economically infeasible. Coordination with local agencies and sponsors was continued. Flooding remains an issue and locals requested a review of the project. A reconnaissance study is reassessing the flood control needs. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement consists of geomorphic channel design setback, floodwalls and levees, training dike, a dry bypass channel, and related environmental mitigation measures. The improvements on Napa River would extend about 7 miles, from Trancas Street to Highway 29. Approximately one mile of Napa Creek, from the confluence of Jefferson, would be improved to increase flood protection. The project will provide 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. A hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste preliminary evaluation was conducted. The Final Supplemental General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report were completed in October 1998. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $15,000,000. 41. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY ASHLEY CREEK ECOSYSTEM, UT (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment The proposed project modification consists of restoring 2.4 miles of stream meanders and associated riparian vegetation on Ashley Creek. The site is part of a 12-mile reach that was straightened and enlarged (dredged) by the Ashley Creek Clearing and Snagging Project constructed by the Corps in 1966. The restoration project would modify the features of the clearing and snagging project by reconstructing stream meanders and replanting associated riparian vegetation on the reach of Ashley Creek most adversely affected by the flood control work. Estimated project cost is $3,616,000. Current project is proceeding under authority of Sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Fiscal year costs were $58,910. CHEROKEE CANAL, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Cherokee Canal is located approximately 10 miles northwest of the City of Oroville in Butte County, California, within the Dry Creek/Cherokee Canal watershed. Oroville is located approximately 68 miles north of Sacramento. Dry Creek/Cherokee Canal flows into Butte Creek, a tributary of the upper Sacramento River. The project include a 300- to 400- acre wetlands restoration site about 10 miles northwest of Oroville and preserve about 840 acres of existing wetland/riparian habitat along the canal downstream of the restoration site by controlling sediment transport. This would establish a rich diversity of habitats for migratory waterfowl, resident birds, and other wildlife, including several listed endangered species. Estimated project cost is $6,600,000. Preliminary Restoration Plan (PRP) has been approved in Jan 00. Initiated Ecosystem Restoration Report (ERR) in Feb 00. Fiscal year costs were $35,768. MORMON CHANNEL, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment 35-34 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Project is located in San Joaquin County, including a portion of the City of Stockton and an area northeast of the City of Stockton. Project will restore the degraded aquatic ecosystem that resulted from the construction and operation of the Stockton Diverting Canal. Mormon Channel originates just downstream of New Hogan Dam and runs west southwest towards Stockton, roughly paralleling the Calaveras River. The Diverting Canal was constructed across Mormon Channel near Highway 99 to divert Mormon Channels flood waters away from eastern Stockton and back into the Calaveras River. The diversion has been an effective flood control measure, but has also excluded most flows from the downstream portion of Mormon Channel. A possible project alternative includes a mechanism whereby some flood waters are transferred from the Stockton Diverting Canal into the downstream portion of Mormon Channel. This flood water will be used as part of an ecosystem restoration effort encompassing the 6.3 miles of Mormon channel between the Diverting Canal and the Stockton Deepwater Ship Channel Turning Basin. Estimated project cost is $6,000,000. The PRP has been approved in Mar 99 and initiated Environmental Restoration Report (ERR) in May 99. Fiscal year costs were $104,521. MURPHY SLOUGH, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment The project site is on the upper Sac River, near Chico Landing and within the Butte Basin Overflow Area. Potential restoration measures identified during the recon study of Murphy Slough include revegetation of riparian forest and development of shaded riverine aquatic habitat. Restoration would provide acres for several State and/or Federally listed endangered or threatened bird and fish species; e.g. willow flycatcher, yellow-billed cuckoo, VELB, Swainsons hawk, Chinook salmon and steel head trout. Physical improvements are desirable along the upper Sacramento River system to improve both flood control conveyance and F&W habitat. Loss and deterioration of riparian habitat is contributing to the extinction and elimination of several Wildlife species. Estimated project cost is $3,631,000. PCA was signed 18 September 1998. Project is in the construction phase. Current project is proceeding under authority of Sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Fiscal year costs were $400,797. NUMANA DAM FISH PASSAGE, NV (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located in Washoe County, Nevada about 8.3 miles upstream from Pyramid Lake on the Lower Truckee River (Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian Reservation). The construction of the Corps' Truckee River project and several agricultural diversions has had a strong detrimental effect on the environmental quality of the Lower Truckee River and Pyramid Lake. One of the effects of lowered river flows has been decreased numbers of Lahonton Cutthroat trout (threatened) and Cui-ui (endangered species) making it up the river to spawn. The fish ladder has been very inefficient for Cui-ui migration. The tentatively selected plan in the draft ERR is to remove Numana Dam. The sponsor, Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, requested that no further action be taken on the project. They are pursuing legislation for 100% federal funding. Fiscal year costs were $1,891. PROSPECT ISLAND, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located in Solano County, California, within the northwest portion of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Region. Prospect Island is a long, rectangular island comprised of 1,580 acres bordered by the Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel (SDWSC) to the west and Miner Slough and Ryer Island to the east. The island has flooded four times, in 1983, 1986, 1995, and in January 1997. The Corps constructed levees adjacent to the SDWSC, which run parallel along the length of the 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 island. These levees are damaged by wave wash from passing ocean vessels in the channel. The construction of the ship channel and reclamation of adjacent lands have also contributed significantly to the loss of valuable wetlands in the study area. Estimated project cost is $6,409,000. PCA was executed in Sep 99. Plans and Specs to be completed in May 01 and initiate construction in Jun 01. Fiscal year costs were $272,241. PROSPECT ISLAND, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located in Solano County, California, within the northwest portion of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Region. The restoration of wetlands and fish habitat on 1,316 acres of Prospect Island was designed to restore environmental resources that have been degraded by construction and operation of the ship channel and Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Project constructions will involve creation of long sinuous interior islands, channels and dead-ends sloughs, and interior levee benches. After the internal features are created, culverts and a breach will place in the exterior Miner Slough Levee to restore water flow to the Island. Water will generally flow north to south in the interior of the Island along a deep central channel but water throughout the Island will be subject to tidal exchange. Native vegetation will be planted along levees and interior islands to prevent erosion and to provide additional wildlife and fish habitat. Estimated project cost is $6,409,000. PCA was executed in Sep 99. Plans and Specs to be completed in May 01 and initiate construction in Jun 01. Fiscal year costs were $272,241. SOUTH FORK PUTAH CREEK PRESERVE, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment The project site is located near the south levee of South Fork Putah Creek, just southeast of the city of Davis. Project is grading and planted for habitat restoration. Estimated project cost is $1,601,000. PCA was signed on 18 December 1998. The previous project was included under the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Project is in the construction phase. Current project is proceeding under authority of Sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Fiscal year costs were $397,496. VIC FAZIO WILDLIFE AREA, CA (formerly Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River, CA, Section 1135) The project is primarily located within the boundaries of the Yolo Bypass, an operative feature of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. The Yolo Bypass extends 43 miles from Fremont Weir on the Sacramento River, south to the town of Rio Vista where it rejoins the river. During periods of high flows on the Sacramento River water is diverted through the Yolo Bypass, creating seasonal wetland areas. The 3,700-acre wildlife restoration area is expected to be a major stop for migratory waterfowl in the Pacific Flyway. Restoration of wetland habitat will attract additional waterfowl, wading birds and shore birds and contribute to the recovery of many Federal and state rare, threatened, or endangered species. The importance of the Yolo Bypass wetland to waterfowl and other water birds has increased due to the disappearance over recent decades of vital wetlands in the Central Valley. The project is the largest wetland restoration project west of the Florida everglades and consists of physical improvements to help create a mixture of native marsh, permanent and seasonal wetlands and riparian forest. Improvements include modifications to existing drainage canals or construction of small dikes and weirs to redirect available water sources to proposed wetland areas. Congress added construction of an administration and maintenance facility and a flood plain hydraulic management model as authorized project features. Current total project cost estimate is $17,362,000, cost 35-36 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT shared 70% Federal and 30% local sponsor. The California State Department of Fish and Game is the non-Federal sponsor. The sponsor will furnish lands, easements, rights of way and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of project modifications for improvement of the environment. At the sponsor's request, separate Local Cooperation Agreements (LCA) were prepared for the Putah Creek Sinks and Yolo Causeway sites. The LCA for the Putah Creek Sinks site was executed in December 1993. The LCA for the Yolo Causeway site was executed in April 1995. A third LCA for a 180-acre site was executed in October 1996. Efforts to complete the floodplain hydraulic management model and project close out and audit activities continue. Fiscal Year costs total $2 1,635. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Sec. 1135(b), as amended by Sec. 304 of WRDA 1990. The project was initiated in fiscal year 1991 with funds added by Congress to the Fiscal Year 1991 Appropriations Bill. A Project Modification Report and an Environmental Assessment/Initial Study were completed in April 1992. Three existing sites were identified for wetlands restoration: Putah Creek Sink (3,000 acres), Yolo Causeway (182 acres) and Willow Slough Bypass (345 acres). Willow Slough Bypass was later withdrawn due to difficulty in acquiring lands. The project was turned over to the Department of Fish and Game in November 1997. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1999, Sec. 508 changed the project name from "Yolo Basin Wetlands" to "Vic Fazio Yolo Wildlife Area". YOLO WETLANDS BASIN, DAVIS SITE, SACRAMENTO, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located contiguous to boundaries of Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass, which is a leveed tributary of Sacramento River on west side of Yolo Bypass. Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass are operative features of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Project include a 369-acre site that consists of 212 acres of permanent wetland, 64 acres of riparian woodland, 64 acres of grassland/upland, and 56 acres of seasonal wetland, dikes, roads, gates, ponds and islands. Water for wetland site is available from City of Davis waste water treatment plant and from its storm drain system. Estimated project cost is $6,000,000. A previous Davis site was included under Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River project, but was with drawn for consideration by local sponsor due to difficulty in obtaining lands. Current project is proceeding under authority of Sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Fiscal year costs were $58,996. 35-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 1. Sacramento River CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels New Work Approp. Cost- Maint. Approp. Cost Maint Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 40,331,192 1 40,331,192 1 2,167,000 5,139,000 1,055,000 1,909,000 59,231,678 2 2,145,480 3,652,774 2,560,678 1,725,466 59,034,079 3 85,000 4 -50,000 18,947 30,000 6,316 62,622 1,912 310 22,000 18,236 57,000 37,339 6,773 25,000 18,096 - 7,816,474 5 7,298 7,782,305 - 2,610,000 2,177 2,591,649 - 15,000 14,578 - 64,696,000 6 10,859 64,199,474 7 4. San Joaquin River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,833,117 8 5,833,117 9 5,293,000 4,260,000 5,252,863 3,002,863 351,000 2,607,000 29,702,382 1,633,119 2,617,123 30,455,969 5. American River New Work Watershed Approp. (Common Elements Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - 5,828,000 6,738,000 13,129,000 25,745,000 - 4,104,812 6,639,672 13,865,637 24,610,121 - 1,325,000 - 167,572 6,099,000 1,121,200 8,545,200 977,941 3,055,566 4,201,079 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 6. American River Watershed (Natomas) New Work Approp. Cost 3,886,000 11,429,000 - 15,163,184 145,000 1,546,000 228,709 15,391,893 7. Buchanan Dam- New Work H.V. Eastman Lake Approl. Chowchilla River, Cost CA (Federal Maint Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 8. Cache Creek New Work Settling Basin, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 9. Calaveras River New Work and Littlejohn Approp. Creek and Trib- Cost utaries including Maint New Hagon Lake Approp. & Farmington Dam Cost CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 10. Colorado River at Great Junction, CO (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 27,369,597 27,369,597 1,314,000 1,463,000 1,288,000 1,657,500 25, 194,893 1,310,283 1,276,810 1,457,826 1,657,911 25,117,574 - - - - 1111,187 10 -11- 1-,-187 to -150,000 2,921,834 161,564 3,500 120,000 32,400 29,114 30,000 13,641,000 - 13,608,917 - 1,279,000 27,464 1,197,278 - 724,000 Ii 676,755 12 23,723,144 13 23,723,144 13 1,834,000 4,453,000 1,969,000 2,137,900 40,663,511 1,830,517 3,951,498 2,423,645 2,196,515 40,232,675 203,594 -23,566 9,910 101,700 39,046 38,802 55,856 38,456 3,828 397 - 1,499,951 15 16 12,131 1,487,884 15 17 -73,200 -33,026 -1,545 40,520 834,900 839,963 96,773 96,773 35-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 11. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Coyote Creek, CA 13. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 2,325 7,276 950,000 -939,000 1,870,611 -778,828 650,000 683,435 5,036 59,012 59,016 100,000 28,851 1,255 5,113 -102,000 74,094 155,000 66,964 -5,000 -4,979 - 12,458,725 - 12,451,883 190,355 19 190,213 19 804,761 20 804,761 20 300,000 2,087,000 113,330 2,836,863 103,229 905,000 882,479 - 14,739,000 - 14,716,289 - 592,382 592,381 3,779,000 21 3,770,497 22 14. Guadalupe River, CA (Required Contrib. (Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 15. Hidden Dam Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost -403,000 1,844,000 6,509,000 2,781,245 2,767,767 4,562,080 690,000 670,259 170,000 284,000 124,797 970,000 249,832 - 1,322,000 104,222 582,338 4,194,000 49,822,000 8,297, 194 45,577,903 2,580,509 9,537,429 1,563,499 7,219,463 919,491 6,341,131 23 1,448,545 5,982,983 24 30,555,426 30,555,426 1,593,000 1,335,000 1,516,000 1,541,262 1,243,242 1,599,132 1,491,000 26,380,818 1,545,946 26,370,992 35-40 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 (Contrib. Funds Other) 16. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 165,112 25 165,112 25 24,450,537 26 24,450,537 26 1,372,455 5,167,000 967,000 1,087,352 5,443,327 1,107,423 834,810 47,721,527 27 28 836,005 47,707,342 27 28 753,000 29 747,718 30 17. Kaweah and Tule New Work Rivers including Approp, Terminus Dam and Cost Success Lake, CA Maint (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 18. Little Dell New Work Lake, UT Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 19. Martis Creek Lake, New Work Martis Creek, NV, Approp. and CA Cost Maint Approp. Cost 595,000 35,592,230 31 261,817 35,259,047 31 3,727,000 3,530,000 4,678,000 3,573,000 64,951,574 32 3,761,806 3,198,416 5,082,328 3,614,081 64,908,367 32 - - - - 633,420 33 34 -- - - 632,695 3335 3,213,000 1,014,000 -190,000 -400,000 40,746,900 2,513,831 1,883,994 -160,062 -407,677 40,581,425 36,172 506,000 493,233 108,704 471,000 365,486 -484,863 422,000 507,462 - 19,954,500 -242,644 19,021,525 - 4,300,147 36 - 4,300,147 37 - 8,504,989 38 - 8,504,989 38 521,000 9,216,383 551,391 9,210,369 35-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 20. Merced County New Work Streams, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib.New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds New Work Other) Approp. Cost 21. Merced County New Work Stream Group, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23. Pajaro River Basin New Work CA (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Fund Contrib. Cost 24. Pine Flat Lake and New Work Kings River, CA Approp. (Federal Fund) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 25. Redbank and New Work Fancher Creeks, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib.New Work Funds) Contrib Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. 497,000 1,734,000 451,434 1,573,751 104,505 109,545 250,636 230,000 205,951 179 84,712 -64,000 12,150 237,000 118,890 357,000 557,234 288 72,000 119,417 13,000 154,700 919,000 20,840,000 619,205 20,845,267 - 614,505 - 595,000 - 4,519,938 3940 25,539 4,560,608 3940 - 2,751,259 41 - 2,751,259 41 62,000 3,250,340 551,391 3,738,674 8,686,968 42 8,686,968 42 - - - - 37,250 43 - - - - 37,250 44 43,356,265 45 43,356,265 45 2,999,000 2,361,000 3,822,000 2,256,000 51,086,046 46 3,104,571 2,247,942 3,904,638 2,322,568 51,073,227 46 -- - - 110,000 47 110,000 47 -90,000 62,466 3,312 7,677 15,271 4,579 12,917 - 47,516,065 48 3,461 47,515,188 48 - 3,354,920 6,180 3,257,729 - 759,580 49 35-42 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 Cost -4,020 701,546 26. Russian River New Work Basin, CA, Coyote Approp. Valley Dam (Lake Cost Mendocino) and Maint Channel Improve- Approp. ments (Federal Cost Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrb. Funds, Other) Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost -251,978 -240,208 90,000 37,063 14,435,869 so 14,435,869 5so 44,777,546 51 52 44,777,546 51 52 67,617 11,000 35,000 25,978 -279,391 -268,282 -581,744 589,911 53 581,744 54 50,000 333,283,645 55 38,214 333,212,431 55 32,915,552 56 31,836,635 57 230,574 58 228,732 59 27. Sacramento River New Work and Tributaries, CA Approp. from Collinsville to Cost Shasta Dam Maint (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 28. San Lorenzo, CA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 29. Upper Jordan UT New Work Approp. Cost 4,870,000 5,478,886 1,600,000 1,600,525 1,350,000 1,214,896 2,024 200,000 123,699 4,315,000 5,400,000 2,803,000 149,163,000 6061 3,216,875 6,133,628 3,405,859 148,821,036 60 1,448,000 1,721,000 1,899,000 34,227,128 62 1,355,079 1,804,978 1,915,496 34,220,120 62 442,500 2,057,500 1,860,000 31,284,354 768,924 1,671,788 1,167,367 29,671,914 1,337 -925,131 2,927,796 63 64 2,925,131 63 64 65 1,194,000 1,606,000 5,546,000 8,546,000 820,003 1,620,688 5,285,178 7,849,568 572,000 978,669 41,470 801,038 500,000 149,865 103,000 -70,000 150,000 109,046 172,173 206,000 1,550,669 842,208 683,000 637,084 35-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVILWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 30. Walnut Creek, CA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Required Contrib.New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 31. West Sacramento New Work CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib New Work Funds) Approp Cost 32. Wildcat and San New Work Pablo Creeks, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib.New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 100,000 47,659 66,058 - 350,000 45,505 21,804 8,304 91 - 71,842,430 66 6,995 71,512,809 67 - 5,683,472 68 - 5,677,857 69 14,783,553 70 14,783,553 70 209,000 308,824 1,020,000 147,589 -100,000 179,737 15,102 170,000 6,944,000 618,000 3,093,000 11,863,000 2,931,333 4,000,899 2,911,110 11,048,818 300,000 2,500,000 158,191 744,195 11,245 11,496 141,000 3,214 - 3,820,000 297,663 1,049,975 12,000 20,373,000 -36,689 20,335,384 10,449 2,518 1,620,000 1,598,685 1,937,000 71 1,906,943 72 36. Lower San New Work Joaquin River Approp. and Tributaries, Cost CA including Maint Tuolumne and Approp. Stanislaus Rivers, Cost CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 49,515 1,182,000 1, 163,364 3,252 2,473 19,742 3,001,000 957,000 1,721,000 1,366,453 2,550,742 1,778,408 371,142,996 73 74 371,134,597 74 17,528,716 17,517,027 80,000 75 80,00075 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular Funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,650,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $17,224,432 for shallow-draft and $41,383,526 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow Bdraft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $17,224,432 for shallow-draft and $41,194,611 35-44 - -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-A (Cont' d) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $28,326,800 funds for Sacramento District. 7. Includes $28,298,863 costs for Sacramento District. 8. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds for maintenance. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes $724,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocation activities including demolition or salvage of various pipes and facilities, constriction of ramps, turnouts, pipe gates and bank protection at Cache Creek Settling Basin. 12. Includes $676,755 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation activities for State of California. 13. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan lake: total to date $897,742. 14. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $826,600 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 15. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily for Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 16. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 17. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, and costs from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 18. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 19. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 20. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $267,840 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $3,643,000 contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation (automotive type bridge) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, $113,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek, and $23,000 from City of Suisun for Phase IIA contract for widening of Railroad Avenue 22. Includes $3,638,022 contributed funds, other costs for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion, $19,537 contributed funds, other costs for Phase III contract, and $112,939 for Phase IIA contract. 23. Includes contributed funds, other: $2,905,630 for recreation betterment, $2,195,591 for NED relocation and $70,000 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River. 24. Includes contributed funds, other costs: $2,624,578 for recreation betterment, $1,496,809 for NED relocations and $0 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River, and $1,175,848 for flood control betterments. 25. Contributed funds, other from the State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 26. Includes $2,199,085 code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella lake and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 27. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 28. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake 35-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-A (Cont' d) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT beginning in FY 1985. 29. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $337,500 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 30. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, costs for boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula, and $309,808 costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 31. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date: $704,000. 32. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 33. Includes contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 34. Includes contributed funds, other, from Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, California for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $423,000; and from DITT, Inc., Paris, France, for Success Lake hydropower studies, $168,000. 35. Includes contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $422,697, and for Success Lake hydropower studies, $167,579. 36. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 37. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200 initiation of plans for specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 720 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed funds, other $4,572,938, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California and contributed funds, other costs for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam. 40. Includes $274,000 contributed funds, other, relocation and $227,968 costs. 41. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of right-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 42. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 43. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 44. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, costs for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 45. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date: $1,595,100. Includes Public Work Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-68) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 46. Includes $158,300 special recreation fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake and $799,785 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 47. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-ofway and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 48. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 49. Includes contributed funds, $759,580 other, from Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation and betterment=s (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam and includes $701,546 contributed funds, other costs for road relocation (Nees Avenue) and betterments at Fancher Dam. 50. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds: $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake 35-46 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont' d) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Mendocino. 52. Includes $1,625,280 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985 through FY 1996. 53. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $338,000 from California department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 54. Includes $250,117 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $331,657 for California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 55. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operations of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 58. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma county for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 59. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 60. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 61. Includes Code 710 funds and cost for recreation facilities at Black Butte lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 62. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 63. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-ofway and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries project) Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through the city of Chico. 64. Includes $41,984 contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities and salmon rearing habitat, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; $392,000 contributed funds, other, from the City of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake; and $59,334 contributed funds, other from State of California for relocation. 65. Includes $389,335 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies; and $59,334 costs for relocations. 66. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 68. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required funds for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required costs for Walnut Creek. 70. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed funds costs for Walnut Creek. 71. Includes $1,937,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Includes $1,906,943 contributed funds, other, costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 73. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E). 74. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 75. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, and costs, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-A (Cont' d) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 American River New Work Watershed CA, Approp. Cost Caliente Creek CANew Work Approp. Cost Coyote and New Work Berryessa Creeks, Approp. CA Cost Napa River, CA New Work Kaweah River Yuba River, Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work CA Approp Cost South Sacramento New Work Approp San Lorenzo River, New Work CA Approp. Cost Truckee Meadows New Work NV Approp. Cost Tule River Basins New Work Approp. Cost Upper Jordan New Work River, CA Approp. Cost West Sacramento New Work CA Approp. Cost 2,127,000 1,181,000 166,375 4,290,000 2,004,798 814,296 642,786 4,022,524 -41,000 -41,111 12 1,125,000 1,161,000 1,294,000 -123,000 1,263,905 1,138,074 1,082,132 155,246 527,000 1,182,930 1,182,070 651,000 508,419 970,790 1,210,598 751,360 11,000 3,338 161,000 63,108 27 39,000 41,628 788,000 788,291 100,000 39,197 750,000 665,701 - 662,800 1,237,000 936,000 - 380,752 1,260,208 982,814 30,000 7,913 9,265 15 -15,000 2,085 50 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a previous flood control project on Napa River. (See Table 35-E). allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 35-48 22,759,375 22,444,738 60,000 60,000 4,368,900 4,368,900 12,947,000 12,947,000 3,551,000 3,447,105 150,000 81,163 1,699,000 1,517, 100 813,000 730,243 6,623,330 6,411,304 -15,000 9,998 1,576,000 1,576,000 1,817,000 1,817,000 R SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Mar 3, 1899 A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento works. July 25,1912 Jan 21, 1927 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov 17, 1987 For work above Sacramento. The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., Ist sess. 1 H. Doc. 123, 69th cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA 10. Oct 23, 1962 CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified bu 2d sess. Nov 7, 1966 Chief of Engineers. 35-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act. Sec 823, 1986 WRDA RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA May 17, 1950 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Feb 10, 1956 Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Oct 23, 1962 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake: Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Mar 7, 1974 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. 24. Dec 22, 1944 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 404, 84th cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 2 35-50 Nov 17, 1986 23. SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents of $15 million for initiation of modification. May 17, 1950 Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included full monetary authorization). Jul 3, 1958 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Jul 3, 1958 Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Jul 14, 1960 Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. May 12, 1967 Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Mar 7, 1974 Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. 3 Jun 19, 1975 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir. 4 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see II. Doc. 1123, 60"h Cong., 2d sess. And S. Doc. 142, 79 th cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive H. Doc. 3667, 81st cong., ist sess. 2 H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 2 S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., PI, 90-17 PL 93-251 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., Ist sess. of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations,amountsto$72,740,000 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - $5,752 12 Middle River and Connecting $8,354 3 Channels, CA Completed 1974 8,500 93,494 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 2,132 56 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - Old River, CA Completed 1970 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,151 s 9631,128 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 9 to 11 218,854 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 3,316,622 121 3 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 733,489 191,728 s Is 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,6000 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry rod and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveral River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58, 901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-52 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35- E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Completed American River, CA Completed Aquatic Plant Control, CA Completed Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Completed Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Completed Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Cache Creek Basin, CA Active/no FY 95 (Outlet Channel) Expenditures Chester, CA Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Cottonwood Creek, CA Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Coyote Creek, CA Completed Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA East Weaver Creek, CA Folsom Lake, American River, CA Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Kays Creek, UT Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Klamath River, CA Lake Camanche, CA Lake Oroville, CA Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Marysville Lake, CA Actil Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA New Bullards Bar, CA North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Pinole Creek, CA Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed ve/no FY 95 Expenditures Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Completed Completed Completed Completed 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1993 1981 1991 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1972 1968 1970 $26,995,350 2,125,818 1,000 $54,778 12 1,369,931 4 217,879 56 26,049 s 3,570,000 8 15,765,000 705,622 664,825 220,636 63,014,810 Is 59 1510 11 136,026 512 407,989 513 1,503,073 5 14 4,838,000 5 10,252,950 is 70,425,470 16 27,835,263 17 s18 10,918,796 2,643,499 2,965,402 2,639,955 19 20 21 1 22 12,890,625 23 904,278 5 2425 885,750 Is 4,620,070 126 35-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35- E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Completed 1969 133,339 527 - Rheem Creek, CA Completed 1962 400,000 528 - Rodeo Creek, CA Completed 1966 974,100 s - Salinas River, CA Inactive 1952 94,213 1 29 - Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT Completed 1961 1,227,570 30 - San Leandro Creek, CA Completed 1973 1,000,000 ,1 - San Lorenzo Creek, CA Completed 1962 5,130,821 132 - San Lorenzo River, CA Completed 1966 4,314,406 133- Sevier River near Redmond, UT Completed 1952 919,000 134 - Sonoma Creek, CA Inactive 1973 781,500 135 - Truckee River and Tributaries, Active/no FY 95 1968 1,038,960 CA and NV Expenditures I. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (9159) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Project not economically feasible; preconstruction planning was terminated in FY 1993. 8. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. A fish ladder modification project was continued under sec. 1135 in FY 1995 at fiscal year cost of $172,565. 9. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 10. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 11. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 12. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 13. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interest for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocation. 14. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 15. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,53616. 16. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control reservation. 17. Cherry Valley and New don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contribution of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvement on Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries. Unconstructed portion of snagging and clearing project modification of Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries) was classified as "deferred" on April 9, 1993. For full report see Annual Report for FY 35-54 1993. 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California=s position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation and utility alterations. 26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962-1963) to determine if project classification to an active category 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocation. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965m402 (FY 1976) for was justified. 30. Estimated cost to local interest for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $4,544,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). Project prevented $9,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 35. Place inactive 1974. 35-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $300,000 Bear River, CA 1980 1986 Cottonwood Creek 1991 1998 15,765,000 Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 Humbolt River and and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 Lakeport Lake, CA 1 1976 1993 2,353,000 Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA 1993 1998 27,835,263 Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA 1997 1998 Sacramento River Major and Minor Tributaries 1997 1998 Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 (Morgan County) Wildcat and San Pablo Creek Reach 2, CA 1997 1998 1. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized on November 17, 1988; and deauthorized November 18, 1993. 35-56 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range in Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal i Tidal 2 Flood 3 Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 I. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,00 170,000 1,993,170 Total 5,833,1 17 80,000 1,342,500 1,177,000 2,519,500 8,432,617 .. I I I " I�II 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. 35-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST, (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contributions ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff i $1,073,000 $30,000 $200,000 $230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 2 5 7,882,000 3 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 4 5 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. District, Improvement No. 3. 3. For lands and construction. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (hourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns Bear Owens Mariposa 4,241 4,545 762 5,080 1,500 2,231 942 5,949 1,646 1,493 137 899 35-58 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River 14,436,000 $5,598,000 $20,034,000 1 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 Total $273,676,000 $109,375,000 $383,051,000 I. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use completed projects. of storage is initiated and inclusive of lands and 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal damages. Government for costs allocated to water supply storage TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 23 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ff) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $17,550,000 I Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98,Russia and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 $363,017,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements Healdsburg Mile I to 14.4 Dry - - 2,864,000 (Dry Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) I II I 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 35-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 24 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal i Total 944 Modification: Antelope Creek2 Inactive $1,400,000 $340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 For lands and damages, including relocation. weir (July 1954 price level). . July 1960 price level. 4. July 1961 price level. . Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton FABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 24 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 42A continuation (Bank protection, miles 88.8-143.3, Sacramento River, Sacramento, Colusa, Sutter and Yolo Counties) Lower American River - River Park initiation (Bank Protection, Sacramento County). $803,695 500,000 $152,641 $956,336 500,000 35-60 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 32 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Study Stage (Federal) City of Folsom Willow & Humlong Creek Reconnaissance 14,982 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO 1 Construction $ -33,026 Battle Mountain, NV Plans and Specification 55,819 Fallon, NV Reconnaissance/Feasibility 11,404 Hamilton City, CA Reconnaissance 147 Legewood Creek, Fairfield, CA Reconnaissance 20,378 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Plans and Specifications 313,928 Reno Flood Warning System Reconnaissance/Feasibility 507,636 Rock Creek and Keefer Slough Reconnaissance 270,032 Tehama, CA Reconnaissance 16,872 Winters, CA Plans and Specification 3,66 $ 627,038 2 1. See Improvement No. 8 for construction. 2. Excludes Coordination Account. TABLE 35-Q AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206, PUBLIC LAW 104-303) (See Section 32 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Study Stage (Federal) Blackwood Creek, CA City Creek Ecoysystem, Utah Clear Lake, CA Clover Creek, Incline & 3rd Creeks, NV Lower Truckee River Paiute Penn Mine Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Soldier Hollow, Utah Upper Jordan River Ecosystem Restoration Upper Truckee River West Jordan River, Utah 1. Excludes Coordination Accounts Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility Reconnaissance/Feasibility $ 87,937 87,937 1,340 50,897 37,240 148,292 103,453 61,057 104,471 202,042 302,644 $ 1,149,733 1 35-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-R SNAGGING AND CLEARING UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO (SECTION 208, 1954 FLOOD CONTROL ACT PUBLIC LAW 83-780) Fiscal Year Cost Study Stage (Federal) Blackwood Creek Planning Design Analysis $ 53,391 San Joaquin River Firebaugh Planning Design Analysis 49,279 Walker River, NV Planning Design Analysis 348,398 Ward Creek Planning Design Analysis 8, 181 $ 459,249 TABLE 35-S SURVEYS (See Section 35 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Navigation Studies $-3,922 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 1,328,160 Required Cost Contributions 3,583,341 Non-Federal Contributions (not required) Special Studies 3,297,100 Special Investigations 44,332 Review of FERC Licenses 14,679 Interagency Water Resources Development 46,936 National Estuary Program 2,490 American Waterfowl Management Plan 3,343 Coordination with Other Water Resource Agencies 214,630 CAL-FED 501,968 Planning Assistance to States 134,096 National Marine Fisheries Service $0 TABLE 35-T EMERGENCY STREAMBANK & SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION 14, 1946 FLOOD CONTROL ACT) Fiscal Year Cost Study (Federal) Skyrocket Creek, Ouray, CO $26,927 35-62 PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED UNDER THE FORMER CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION The California Debris Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Page Tables 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans ................ 35-1A 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (debris control). .................. 35-2A 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation-Restraining Barriers, CA ...... 35-3A Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA .............. 35-3A Table 35-AA Table 35-BB Table 35-CC Cost and Financial Statement ............. 35-7A Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-10A Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project ... .35-12A Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provided for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners were fully investigated by the former California Debris Commission and permits to operate were issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or 35-1A Navigation Page __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Government- constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners bore all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the former Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The former Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L.Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by Sec. 12, Public Law 93-25 1, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. Permit No. DACW05-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1984, March 1, 1989, and on March 1, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., (PG&E) (a 1941 contract which expired July 31, 1991) payment was made to Federal Government of $18,000 per year for first 30 years and $48,000 per year for the next 20 years in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1999, amounts to $1,767,109; these funds are now paid to the Secretary of the Army and deposited for return to the Treasury. PG&E has obtained a new license, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 1403-004, issued February 11, 1993, for continued operation of Narrows No. 1 Hydroelectric Project and has entered into a new storage agreement and an operation agreement with the Federal Government (Corps). Total payment of $66,070 was received in FY 1994, but only $48,000 was reallocated to the District. In FY 1995, $18,070 was reallocated to the District. Payments under new agreement are effective as of Fiscal Year 1993 and will be 8.2 percent of previous fiscal year's total costs for operation and maintenance. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power developmentof Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. 35-2A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT DA-04-167-CIV-ENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1997, amounts to $2,509,066. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $3,538,005, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and operation studies by hired labor on Yuba River. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. 35-3A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 35-BB for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1996 total project cost is $171,950,000, of which $76,322,000 is Federal and $95,628,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109) and land acquisition for Little Holland Tract as hydraulic and environmental mitigation in potential projects impacting stages of the Sacramento River, but excludes Sacramento Urban Area; Marysville/Yuba City Area; Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction Projects. Colusa Basin Drain and Knights Landing (West Levee) are not incrementally economically feasible, but these sites have been transferred to Upper Sacramento Area. Knights Landing (East Levee) has been included with Mid-Valley Area. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., I st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., Ist sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., I st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., Ist sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of Freeport. Estimated (October 1995) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $42,900,000 of which $28,215,000 is Federal and $14,685,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,135,000). Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District) (G.C.I.D.) is part of 35-4A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT the fishery/irrigation enhancement project being developed by G.C.I.D. Project is located between River Mile 202 and 206 on Sacramento River near the Glenn-Tehama county line, about 100 miles north of Sacramento, California. The Corps riffle restoration project includes multiple sheet pile revetments coupled with a stone grade to replicate natural riffle and bank protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. This will stabilize river hydraulics. Estimated (October 1995) project cost is $26,000,000, of which $20,000,000 is Federal and $6,000,000 is non-Federal. Project was established under authority of the 1917 Sacramento River Flood Control Project (see Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1990 and Water Resources Development Act of 1996 and 1999). Phase II - Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Butte, Sutter and Yuba counties in north-central California. Area includes Feather and Yuba Rivers and their tributaries, Sutter Bypass, cities of Marysville and Yuba City and communities of Linda and Olivehurst. An evaluation of about 134 miles of Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in Marysville/Yuba City area identified about 22 miles of levees as being structurally unstable. Project consists of reconstructing those levees by installing about 9 miles of slurry cut-off wall, 11 miles of toe drain, and 7 miles of levee freeboard restoration to rectify structural stability; also consists of raising about 10 miles of levees to restore design freeboard and developing about 76 acres for fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated (October 1998) project cost is $42,970,000, of which $32,260,000 is Federal and $10,710,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $5,190,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase III - Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Placer, Solano, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties in north-central California. Area includes the Sacramento and Feather Rivers, Knights Landing Ridge Cut, Sutter and Yolo Bypasses and portions of the Bear River including Yankee Slough, Dry, Cache, Putah Creeks and the Natomas Cross Canal. Communities in the area include Knights Landing, Robbins, Davis and Woodland. An evaluation of about 240 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Mid-Valley area identified about 18 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstructing about 18 miles of levees by installing about 6.9 miles of landside berms with toe drains, relocation of ditches, about 11.2 miles of embankment modifications, about .2 miles of slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 52 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated (October 1999) project cost is $19,600,000, of which $14,700,000 is Federal and $4,900,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,400,000). Project was established under authority of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase IV - Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Sacramento County in north-central California. Area includes the lower Sacramento River and its distributary sloughs and the city of Clarksburg. An evaluation of about 295 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Lower Sacramento area identified about 47 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstructing about 2.6 miles of levees by installing landside berms with toe drains, backfilling of existing drainage collector systems, slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 2 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated (October 1998) project cost is $6,800,000, of which $5,100,000 is Federal and $1,700,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $1,220,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase V - Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood System in Colusa County in north-central California. Area includes the upper Sacramento River and its tributaries and the city of Colusa. An evaluation of about 315 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Upper Sacramento area identified about 12 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstruction of about 3.7 miles of levees by installing landside berms with toe drains, slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 1.3 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1999 project cost is $7,730,000, of which $5,810,000 is Federal and 35-5A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 $1,920,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $856,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Recontruction: Construction is complete, however, final payment and contract close-out activities remain. (b) Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.)): Construction was completed on riffle restoration on Sacramento River including building of multiple sheet piles coupled with stone to replicate natural riffle and bank protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to approximate pre-1970 conditions. Concurrently, GCID, The Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California are designing a project to build new screens near GCID pumping facilities. Subsequent to original authority in FY90 EWDAA, sponser selected a flat screen design and determined that a larger gradient facility was required for proper operation of the fish screens. As a result, an LRR and ROD for the larger facility was approved in April 1998. Plans and specs were initiated in January 1999. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in December 1999. The Gradient Facility construction contract was awarded in February 2000. Construction management and engineering and design effort continue. Fiscal Year costs total $9,760,805. (c) Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction: Construction is essentially complete Engineering and Design continue for addition work at Site 7 extension. (d) Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction: Completed Contract 1D awarded in December 1999 and continued contract IB awarded in July 1997. Engineering continued for the second Project Cooperation Agreement for Areas 2, 3 and 4. (e) Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. (f) Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. In accordance with Section 215 agreement signed September 22, 1997, local sponsor constructed 1,000 lineal feet of seepage/stability berm along the Sacramento River (Site E). Completed contract 3a awarded September 1997, continued contract 2b awarded August 1997, continued contract 3 awarded July 1988, and continued maintenance period for mitigation contract awarded August 1995. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1990. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area Levees. (See Table 35-CC for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1996.) 35-6A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries. CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barries, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New York Contrib. Cost 821,325 821,325 5,093,999 1 2 5,093,999 1 2 1,287,915 1,277,023 1,216,222 984,716 1,129,739 926,127 1,208,560 1,170,927 19,333,417 3 19,297,502 4 323,420 315,777 361,482 361,482 307,000 179,182 530,000 -141,000 322,815 193,428 93,000 89,034 2,641,531 7 2,636,894 7 S1, 053,904 1,053,904 361,777 361,777 56,000 70,008 92,000 18,047 1,989,338 1,883,230 1,053,904 1,053,904 36,000 8 34,000 4 . Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 61,310 245,765 - 1,500,000 -1,500,000 55,419 48,158 -128,138 35-7A 80,739,471 9 80,739,081 9 1,979, 104 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 1999 Project (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) Sacramento River Flood Control (G.C.I.D), CA (Federal Funds) Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 72,000 803,419 11,066 11,352 16,725 4,516 3,852 -38,548 437,408 13 820,000 763,000 750,000 8,046,000 241,207 660,133 692,144 817,877 3,900,100 1,855,071 1,979,104 10,724,085 10 10,724,085 to 9,686 11 9,686 11 28,075,000 28,071,933 2,157,613 2,070,517 5,867,1751213 5,867,175 12 5,226,000 14 5,091,550 14 3,900,100 15 1,855,071 15 Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. Control Cost (Marysville/Yuba City Area levees). CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. Control Cost (Mid-Valley Area New Work Levee Reconstruction) Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost 7,174,000 18,994,794 -2,537,000 4,930,067 15,711,402 3,421,799 2,086,210 4,393,215 - 267,616 4,550,494 1,856,474 -5,000 87,826 133,729 1,938,690 2,859,000 221,000 2,405,000 1,960,224 2,472,155 726,907 2,136,419 335,000 327,500 748,000 424,000 357,952 502,623 243,794 495,626 35-8A 28,777,794 28,695,272 8,714,425 7,311,819 8,244,000 7,922,486 2,184,500 1,599,995 I SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-AA (Cont=d) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. 273,000 378,000 380,000 587,000 2,222,365 Control Cost 352,102 389,522 370,195 414,210 2,011,305 (Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction) (Federal Funds) Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. 354,000 572,226 222,000 510,000 1,658,206 Control Cost 319,791 490,759 281,808 330,203 1,422,561 (Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction) (Federal Funds) 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $17,348,051 from regular funds and $1,989,336 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $17,339,858 from regular costs and $1,957,614 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 5. Includes $12,420 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float; and $311,000 funds from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes $12,420 costs for acquisition of boarding float and $280,317 costs for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of$207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. Includes $2,000 from Yuba County Water Agency in May 1994. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project;$4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. I 1. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 12. Includes contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West Sacramento areas. (Sacramento Urban Area). 13. Includes $1,328,842 contributed funds, other cost for relocations of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellananeous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket, and West Sacramento areas. 14. G.C.I.D. construction funds received in FY 1991, but no costs were incurred. Includes $493,000 total funds and costs under General Investigations for Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 15. Not reflected in actual annual accounting records for Marysville/Yuba City are $1,710,000 costs 35-9A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 35-BB AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorization in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents for FY 91 and FY 92 incurred under Sacramento River Flood Control Project for design effort. These costs are considered part of Marysville/Yuba City cost-shared project. 35-IOA 1. Mar. 1, 1983 Feb 27, 1907 June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other re- straining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. 35-11A Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 4 7tb Cong., I"' sess. i (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.) 1 Nov. 17, 1986 Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA Dec. 22, 1944 And May 17, July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 May 24, 1994 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Additional levee construction and reconstruction, Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, Sacramento River from Chico Landing to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 Bank protection works at critical locations, Sacramento River. 2 Acquiring and permanently restoring Little Holland Tract to tidal lands with seasonal and emergent marshlands would not only have substantial environmental benefits, but measurable flood control benefits as well. H. Doc. 649, 781 Cong., 2d sess., and 367, 81"s Cong., I t sess. H. Doc. 272, 84 th Cong., 2d sess S. Doc. 103, 86'h Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 533, 108 th Cong., 2d sess, 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 7 4 th Cong., 1' sess. 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. 35-12A 4. 1950 _ __ __ SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-BB (Cont=d) AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorization in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Regular $74,143,882 $1,979,104 $76,122,986 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. 75,630,351 1,979,104 77,609,455 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds $85,674,436 1,988,790 $87,663,226 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plan purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 2. Excludes financial information for Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.), Marysville/Yuba city Area Levee Reconstruction and Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction and the Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction Projects, all authorized under the Sacramento River Flood Control Project (See Table 35-AA). 35-13A ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries in New Mexico; the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the San Juan River Basin in New Mexico; and the watersheds of the Gila, San Francisco and Mimbres Rivers and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control............... ...........Pa.g.e...... 1. Acequias Irrigation System.............36-1 2. Alamogordo, NM .........................36-2 3. Alamosa, CO..... . ........... 36- 2 4. Conchas Lake, NM...................36-2 5. El Paso, TX ............................... 36-3 6. John Martin Reservoir, CO...........36-3 7. Las Cruces, NM ........................... 36-4 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM..................36-4 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM .................... 36-5 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM ....................... 36-5 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM ........................36-6 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM.................36-6 8E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM............... 36-7 8F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM..........36-7 8G. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM ...............................3 6-8 Flood Control 1. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYTEM, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in north-central New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project consists of about one thousand Acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide rrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization Period of the 17 't and 18'"centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an Flood Control (Continuation) 9. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM......36-8 10. Trinidad Lake, CO.................... 36-9 11. Two Rivers Dam, NM.................36-10 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 3..6-10 13. Scheduling of flood control reservoir operations .............. 36-10 14. Other authorized flood control projects ............................ 36-11 15. Flood control work under special authorizations .......... ....3.6..-.1.1 General Investigations 16. Surveys.................. ......... 36-12 17. Collection and study of basic data...36-12 18. Environmental Data Studies.......... 36-12 General Investigations (Continued) 19. Pre-construction Engineering and Design ........................... 36-12 20. Other Work Under Special Authority...... ..................................... ...... 3 6-12 integral part of the culture and heritage of New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from spring runoff or sunimer thunderstorms. Disruption of the ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at thr end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts have been awarded in every year since FY 1988. Condition at end of fiscal year. There are several projects in various stages of design and construction. In the traditional Acequia program, El Pueblo and La Joya Phase III are currently being designed with construction scheduled for 2001. Tularosa was completed this year under the Section 215 program and El Vado de Juan Paiz and La Joya Phase II are under construction. 2. ALAMOGORDO, NM Location. The project is located in south-central New Mexico in Otero County, in and near Alamogordo, NM. The city is situated at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains near the eastern edge of the Tularosa Basin. Proposed Project. The authorized project consists of a concrete and rip-rap lined diversion channel with 100-year flow capacity, which will intercept flows from the Sacramento Mountains east of the City. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation, see page 694 of Annual Report for 1966. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Plans and specifications for Phase I of the South Diversion Channel were completed in September 2000. The construction contract was awarded in December and work began in February 2001. Scheduled completion is February 2002. Plans and specifications for Phase II of the South Diversion will begin in October 2000, and are scheduled for completion in April 2002. A reevaluation of the North Diversion Channel was initiated December 2000 at the request of local interests concerned with potential induced flooding along Red Arroyo. This study will evaluate the potential of replacing the North Diversion with a detention structure. This study is scheduled for completion in July 2001. 3. ALAMOSA, CO Location. The project lies in south-central Colorado along the Rio Grande, in the community of Alamosa, CO. Project. The project consists of a levee system which will replace and augment the existing spoil bank levees. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 199s applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Levee construction activities were completed September 1998. Environmental mitigation is ongoing. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction completed. Environmental mitigation is scheduled for completion in March 2001. 4. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. The dam is located in San Miguel County, NM on the Canadian River, just below the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This dam consists of a concrete gravity main section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water from the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for flood control; 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation; and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 squaremiles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1983 for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. 36-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. Sediment damages of $78,000 were prevented during FY 2000. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 2000. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 2000 were $4,748,800. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 2000 were $318,300. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 2000 were $11,513,000. The pool elevation at the start of FY 2000 was 4,199.16 feet. Releases of 121,810 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,912 acre-feet to Bell Ranch and 0 acre-feet to the Canadian River channel. The pool elevation on September 30, 2000 was 4,184.91 feet with corresponding storage of 189,376 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 696 acre-feet. Condition at the of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1939. Irrigation of some lands downstream for the project began in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5. EL PASO, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a Single-purpose flood control system of detention dars, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying SUburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1998 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990), and Americas Basin (March 1993). During FY 1996, flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. Condition at the end of fiscal year. At the end of 1999, all construction work in Central and Northwest areas were complete. Construction was completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Channel, in March 1993 on Americas Basin, and in October 1998 on Bluff Channel. Construction is ongoing for the Lomaland System. 6. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River , minB ent County, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey 36-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing Project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of flood control is 605,115 acre-feet (259,417 for flood control and 345,698 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. Sediment damages of $132,700 were prevented during FY 2000. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by this project through FY 2000 were $139,197,800. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 2000 were $754,900. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $27,992,600. Maximum pool elevation of 3,852.29 feet with corresponding storage of 348,865 acre-feet occurred on February 22, 2000. Total releases for FY 2000 were 326,179 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 192,098 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 1,185 acre-feet in FY 2000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. The project structures are in good condition and operational. 7. LAS CRUCES, NM Location. Improvements are located in Las Cruces, NM, 40 miles north of El Paso, TX. Proposed Project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The project consists of enlargement and modifications of two existing detention basins and an irrigation ditch in order to provide increased flood protection to the downtown commercial and residential district of Las Cruces. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated cost of $8,800,000 ($6,600,000 Federal and $2,200,000 non- Federal) 1 October 1996 price levels. Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. The City of Las Cruces is the non-Federal local sponsor. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The construction contract for the project was awarded in January 2000. Construction will be complete in September 2001. 8. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are located on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico (H.Doc 243, 81"s Congr., 1" Sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Darn. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the State of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81s' Cong., 2"nd Sess.). The Act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, an drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of 36-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation and Table 36-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 8A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is located on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 545,784 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,192,801 acre-feet. For a detailed description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. A non-Federal hydropower plant was completed in 1990 by the County of Los Alamos. The capacity of this plant is 13.2 MW. Drainage adits were completed in 1990 to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 2000, the pool elevation was 6,217.68 feet. The maximum pool (6,219.59 feet) and storage (182,234 acre-feet) occurred on March 14, 2000. On September 30, 2000, the Pool elevation was 6,187.55 feet with a Corresponding storage of 75,285 acre-feet. There was 921 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 2000. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 2000. Sediment damages prevented were $103,200. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $391,403,300 through FY 2000. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in February 1963. The project structures are in good condition and operational. Abiquiu Dam was originally equipped with Emergency Gates, however, provisions on initial construction were made for later installation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of a set of emergency gates to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. Funds were appointed under Construction General and in May 1997, construction of the gates commenced. Installation of the gates does not meet contract specifications. The Corps is attempting to work with the contractor and surety to resolve those deficiencies. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. The dam is located at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texas state line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is part of the embankment of the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. 36-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 The reservoir has a storage capacity of 582,019 acre-feet at the spillway crest , of which 78,640 acre-feet is dedicated for recreation and sediment control. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square-mile drainage area. For more improvement details, see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1999, the pool elevation was 5,338.75 feet with a corresponding storage of 47,719 acrefeet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,342.25 feet with a storage of 51,945 acre-feet on February 6, 2000. On September 30, 2000, the pool elevation was 5,339.31 feet with a corresponding storage of 48,346 acre-feet. There was 757 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 2000. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 2000. Sediment damages prevented were $84,800. Accumulated total damages prevented are $435,262,900. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. The dam is located at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map, San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consists of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with maximum dischaige capacity of 4,980 cubic-feet-per-second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 7 feet and the spillway was widened 575 feet to provide adequate discharge capacity to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The dam safety modifications contract was awarded in February 1998 and is scheduled to be complete in October 1999. The project has 79,600 acre-feet of sediment space. For more details of complete improvements and authorizing legislation, see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1999. No storage occurred during FY 2000. Peak inflow was 1,290 CFS cfs and maximum outlflow was 1,290 cfs. There was 21 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 2000. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $2,300 totaling $173,900 through FY 2000. There were no flood control benefits associated with the Project. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 146.6 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrollable saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubicfeet- per-second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 97,425 acre-feet at spillway crest (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 24,425 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation, see page 17-17 of Annual Repoa for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. 36-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1999, the pool elevation was 5,191.38 feet with a corresponding storage of 18,790 acrefeet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,194.38 feet with a storage of 22,400 acre-feet on May I, 1999. On September 30, 2000, the pool elevation was 5,182.53 feet with a corresponding storage of 10,702 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 2000. Sediment deposition during FY 2000 was 148 acre-feet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 2000. Sediment benefits during FY 2000 were $16,600. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 2000 were $25,133,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and all structures are in operation. 8E. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Location. The project is composed of 45 square-miles of floodplain lying along the Rio Grande from the vicinity of Corrales to Belen, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project consists of raising and rehabilitating 51.5 miles of levees to provide the 270-year level of protection, and the creation of 75 acres of wetlands from borrow areas within the bosque, and acquisition of 200 acres to satisfy fish and Wildlife mitigation requirements. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $62,400,000 ($46,800,000 Federal and $15,600,000 non-Federal) 1 Oct 97 price levels. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the Corrales Unit was completed in July 1997. A General Reevaluation report Study for the remaining units (Mountainview, Islet and Belen) is currently underway. The Study will update costs, benefits and environmental impacts of the project that have changed since the project was authorized in 1986. The Reevaluation report is scheduled to be Completed in 2003. 8F. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is located on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espafiola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 36-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work being the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 36-D on existing project and Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resources Development Act , and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non- Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espaiiola Valley unit is in the deferred category. However, by letter dated 11 November 1998, the City has requested a feasibility study to be completed to address river and tributary flooding in Espailola. Negotiations are underway to identify a non-Federal source of funds to cost share in the study. It is anticipated the study can begin in April 2000 and be completed in 2001. For more details, see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. 36-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Operations and results during fiscal year. There were no flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 2000. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 2000 amounted to $48,759,200. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 3,000 cfs at Albuquerque on August 20, 2000. The peak at San Acacia was 2,500 cfs on August 21, 2000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bemalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to the Bosque del Apache unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was completed on the Truth or Consequences unit in fiscal year 1991. 8G. SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Location. The authorized project is located along the Rio Grande, extending from the upper end of the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel at the San Acacia diversion works to the head of Elephant Butte Reservoir. Proposed project. The authorized project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consists of the reconstruction of 42 miles of existing spoil bank levee which separates the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel from the cleared floodway. The proposed project would be constructed at an estimated total cost of $65,850,200 ($57,107,730 Federal and $8,231,275 non-Federal) 1 Oct 98 price levels. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 apply. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 modified the Local Sponsor's required contribution. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Construction has been postponed while preparation of a supplemental EIS and Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR) are prepared. The Supplemental EIS was required when two species, found within the project area, were submitted and listed as endangered species. In addition, the Bureau of Reclamation is currently studying potential changes to the location, configuration and operating of the low-flow conveyance channel. This analysis is scheduled for completion in 2004. Because a major portion of the benefits attributed to the authorized levee project are derived from the low-flow channel, it would not be prudent to proceed to construction with this project until the outcome of the operation studies in 2004. However, it is still possible to proceed to construction with the 7- mile levee adjacent to Socorro. A sponsor is currently being solicited for that segment of the authorized plan. If a sponsor cannot be found by June 2001, further studies will be placed on hold until approximately 2004. 9. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Gudalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of this project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete-lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 439,860 acre-feet which includes 72,860 acrefeet sediment reserve, 200,000acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. Ihe surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,594 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square-miles. For more detailed report of the authorized project, including the modification to existing Sumner Lake, see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation, see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and 36-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating, and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake), see page 17-5 of Annual Report of 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,745.08 feet with storage of 97,365 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 103,289 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 2000 was 4,687.06 acre-feet with a storage of 3,736 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,745.51 feet with a storage of 98,950 acre-feet on April 4, 2000. There was 143 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 2000. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $16,000. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $5,431,800 through FY 2000. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 99,060 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $346,644,600, and accumulated sediment damages prevented were $1,787,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir Operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Construction of the recreation area was completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 10. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatorie River about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. The project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, o. (See Geological Survey Map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gatecontrolled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,8000 cfs, with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. In 1989, the recreation pool was increased from 4,500 to 15,967 acre-feet, utilizing some originally unallocated space in the project. The reservoir provides forstorage of 51,000 acre-feet for flood control, 35,045 acrefeet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 17,179 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 123,224 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square-miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation, see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities, see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. On October 1, 1999, the pool elevation was 6,223.43 feet with a corresponding storage of 63,252 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,230.02 feet with a corresponding storage of 71,053 acre-feet on March 31, 2000. On September 30, 2000 the pool elevation was 6,192.42 feet with a corresponding storage of 29,209 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 2000 was 111 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 2000 was $41,500. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,721,400. Irrigation benefits for FY 2000 were $39,554. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1999 were $2,121,300. Irrigation benefit releases for 36-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 the year were 12,497 acre-feet. There are no flood control benefits associated with this project. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was completed in May 1983. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 11. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region east of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM. (See Geological Survey Map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The Two Rivers project consists of two dams: Diamond A and Rocky. The Diamond A Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an eartfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage, except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 600 cfs. A Dam Safety Reconnaissance Report, approved in June 1995, identified the need to increase the size of the spillway on the left abutment of the Rocky Dam by 1,170 feet in order to accommodate the revised Probable Maximum Flood flows for the Dam. The spillway was widened 1,170 feet in 1998 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 163,773 acre-feet, of which 13,775 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square-miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscil year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1999. There were no flood damages prevented during 2000. There were no sediment damages prevented during 2000. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 2000 were $190,604,600. There were 0 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 2000. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 2000 are $1,107,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is completed and was placed in operation July 1963. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 2000 were $490,915.24. 13. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO, controls runoff from 40 square-miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Platoro is operated by the Conejos Water Conservancy District. Total storage is 59,571 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet solely for flood control. The 53,571 acre-feet is joint-use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriate Act of 1941. (See H Doc 693, 7 6 th Cong., 3' Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1999, storage in Platoro Reservoir was 35,484 acre-feet at elevation 10,006.12 feet. Maximum storage of 35,484 acre-feet at elevation 10,006.12 feet occurred on October 1, 2000. On September 30, 2000, 36-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT storage was 17,166 acre-feet at elevation 9,977.82 feet. There were no flood damages prevented by the project during FY 2000. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $6,094,200. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers, during FY 2000 was $20,894.93. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87"' Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has a total capacity of 349,940 acre-feet at the top of the flood pool with 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint-use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1999 was 239,982 acre-feet, elevation 4,876.71 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 279,476 acre-feet at elevation 4,885.26 feet on March 15, 2000. Storage on September 30, 2000 was 160,891 acre-feet at elevation 4,856.06 feet. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 2000. Total flood damages prevented to date are $11,316,700. Total cost for FY 2000 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $15,955.77. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sunmer Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 cfs was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 cfs Sumner is operated by the Carlsbad Irrigation District. Storage on October 1, 1999 was 422,374 acre-feet at elevation 4,260.45 feet. Maximum storage for FY 2000 was 42,232 acrefeet at elevation 4,260.45 feet on October 1, 1999. Storage on September 30, 2000 was 6,742 acre-feet at elevation 4,238.78 feet. Total cost for FY 2000 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $15,989.40. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84 th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,708,600 acre-feet. The project controls a drainage area of 3,230 square miles. Storage on October 1, 1999 was 1,556,900 acrefeet, elevation 6,075.39 feet. Maximum storage for FY 2000 was 1,582,700 acre-feet, elevation 6,077.16 feet on May 30, 2000. Storage on September 30, 2000 was 1,356,600 acre-feet, elevation 6,060.69 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 2000 activity was $24,104.98. Brantley Dam, on the Pecos River, above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM, controls runoff from 13,208 square-miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, fish and wildlife, and recreation for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,700 acrefeet for flood control The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by the Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1999, the storage was 27,333 acre-feet at elevation 3,247.97 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 2000 activity was $15,977.87. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS S See Table 36-D. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80 th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Costs during FY 2000 were: Little Puerco River, Gallup, NM ($36,000); Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $10; Raton Creek, Raton, NM, $4,532; Section 205 Coordination Account, $10,221; Flume at Willow Creek, Creede, CO, $31,337; Unnamed Arroyo, Hernandez, NM, $14,418. 36-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84'h Congress, and antecedent legislation.) There were no Federal costs in FY 2000 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79"' Congress.) Section 14 Coordination Account $8,938; Isidro RD Santa Fe River, NM $51,296; Rio Puerco River, 1-40 Bridge, Gallup, $1,280; Unnamed Arroyo, Hwy 371 near Crownpoint, NM, $1; Cibola County Road 7, Cubero, NM, $230,497; Chinook Lake, Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO, $6,738. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83 rd Congress.) There were no costs in FY 2000. General Investigations 16. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $689,290.76 for flood damage prevention studies, $119,151.22 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies). 17. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $498,314.53 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrological studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special studies, hydrometeorological studies, sedimentation studies, and environmental data studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $229,665.21. 18. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES There were no Environmental Data Study costs for FY 2000. 19. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN There were no Continuation of Engineering and Design costs in Fy 2000. 20. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY FY 2000 costs for Section 1135 projects were $364,112.27 and Section 206 costs were $655,120.55. 36-12 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 1. Acequias Irrigation New Work System, NM 2. Alamogordo, NM Alamosa, CO Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 5. Conchas Lake, NM 6. El Paso, TX Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 946,000 94,000 480,301 506,128 695,000 456,000 454,350 633,840 465,000 690,372 299,000 228,541 95,000 2,998,000 (100,000) 672,906 2,725,875 455,632 550,000 700,000 758,867 30,000 12,494,000' 802,924 12,342,649' 5,675,000 5,613,373 5,630,0002 55,835 5,574,1472 17,975,450 17,762,795 518,356 518,356 854,664 854,664 1,189,295 1,194,201 1,477,636 1,372,500 1,084,458 1,317,562 1,494,868 1,372,305 13,821,4993 13,821,4993 27,877,856 27,857,427 4,878,422 6,997,000 4,849,000 2,776,000 107,549,0004 6,507,234 5,702,520 4,824,405 3,987,235 107,237,3534 36-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 TABLE 36A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 7. John Martin New Work Las Cruces, NM Rio Grande Basin, NM Abiquiu Dam, NM Cochiti Lake, NM Galisteo Dam, NM Jemez Canyon Dam, NM Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 15,555,3585 15,555,5715 1,398,000 1,718,135 2,81.1,031 2,016,748 38,774,932 1,382,201 1,703,666 2,849,179 1,949,323 38,667,653 405,000 355,964 450,000 420,796 651,000 2,913,000 537,388 1,965,936 646,000 2,840,000 3,319,000 304,181 2,816,446 3,253,305 4,614,050' 3,438,917' 100,000 34,050,028 422,849 33,823,528 1,420,600 1,322,320 1,185,843 1,470,574 39,464,941 1,227,406 1,576,201 1,210,038 1,466,183 39,401,899 - - - - 96,956,559 - - 96,956,559 1,837,400 1,876,600 1,964,795 1,743,874 2,123,835 1,985,713 292,000 2,975,000 309,791 2,810,773 250,300 258,210 245,335 253,895 476,000 674,146 273,994 280,130 3,151,643 33,642,605 3,013,894 33,495,096 - 18,283,053 - 18,213,168 261,564 4,307,623 256,764 4,301,690 6;293,972 6,293,972 504,000 380,767 1,231,000 3,842,369 477,000 635,640 562,000 544,144 326,310 332,557 224,000 340,297 586,700 11,726,742 569,144 11,708,329 515,000 8,891,0007 448,369 9,292,194' 36-14 Reservoir 8. 9. 10A. 10B. 1 OC. loc. 10D. 10OE. ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 10F. Rio Grande Floodway New Work Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM 11. Santa Rosa Dam & Lake, NM 12. Trinidad Lake, CO 13. Two Rivers Dam, NM 'Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. include non-Federal contributions of $2,412,000. 293,000 309,015 728,388 875,497 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 237,000 1,475,000 179,237 1,483,615 304,000 317.039 SExcludes $59,977 337,000 346,573 823,829 860,651 544,645 548,131 (20,000) 54,973 346,517 356,314 emergency Includes $30,000 for Code 710. 515,000 400,084 852,295 850,637 599,977 601,525 253,459 251,444 relief funds 4,794, 8688 4,794,8688 5,065,0009 4,891,089' 41,039,741 41,039,056 13,841,148 13,835,444 55,774,758 55,774,758 10,770,651 10,767,214 6,759,244 6,757,619 4,757,009 5,754,681 for new work. 2PED activities were initiated in FY 1991. l'Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work Performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 4Does not include non-Federal contributions of $2,657,653. "Includes $514,741 PED funds. 7Includes $1,177,000 PED funds. 'Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espafiola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum of agreement between that agency and the Corps. 9Includes $1,658,000 PED funds. 36-15 10G. Approp. Cost 545,000 570,839 926,501 853,186 601,000 568,476 493,800 584,626 304,000 155.317 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 TABLE 36B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Nov. 17, 1986 Oct.12, 1996 Oct. 31, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 12,1996 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 30, 1997 Project and Work Authorized ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canals. Except that the Federal share of reconnaissance studies carried out by the Secretary under this section shall be 100 percent ALAMOSA, COLORADO Authorized a flood control project for Alamosa, Colorado. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) LAS CRUCES, NM The project for flood control, Las Cruces, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1996, at total of $8,278,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,494,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,784,000. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) The emergency gate construction project for Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico, authorized by section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662, 100 Stat. 4232) is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to construct the project at an estimated total cost of $7,000,000. The non- Federal share of the project shall be 25 percent of those costs of the project attributable to an increase in flood protection as a result of the installation of such gates. See Section In Text H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., Ist sess.' Public Law 104-303 104 Congress H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong .,st sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong ., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 104-206 (Sec. 112) 36-16 Documents Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) Public Law 104-30 104'h Cong. ,(Sec.334) Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 101) 1. al ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 36B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 10G. Oct. 31, 1992 See Section In Text 10E. 10F. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Modified the cost sharing to more equitably reflect the non-Federal contribution for the project by that percentage of benefits which is attributable to the Federal properties; except that, for purposes of this subsection, Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent of the total project benefits. Documents Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong , 2nd sess. Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 102(e)) 36-17 Project and Work Authorized MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Authorized project for flood control, Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM. Authorized increase of flood protection through the dredging of the bed of the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Albuquerque, NM to an elevation lower than existed on the date of enactment of this Act. The project shall include the establishment of 75 acres of wetlands for fish and wildlife habitat and the acquisition of 200 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) ~ -- Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 TABLE 36C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Drainage Total Above Nearest Area (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espafiola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high 30,901,0281 NM 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez Dam 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 6,293,972 106,100 NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway to 394' enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 96,956,559 596,300 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 17,807,053 89,000 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 'Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. TABLE 36D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1996 Project Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico Alpine, Texas' Cibolo Creek, Texas' Cochiti Wetfields, New Mex"'" Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)' Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' Fountain Creek, Pueblo, Colorado' Highway 12, Colorado' Holly, Colorado' Las Animas, Colorado2 Las Cruces, New Mexico2 Pecos, Texas3 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' Puerco River, Gallup, New Mexico' Rio Grande Floodway, T or C Unit, New Mexico l Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico3 Smith Creek, Colorado' Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 'Completed. 'Responsibility of local interests. 3 lInactive. 4Deferred. Full Report See Annual Operation & Report For 1966 1977 1983 1994 1959 1952 1993 1985 1985 1980 1980 1977 1954 1993 1994 1983 1985 1965 Construction 189,356 130,488 829,500 13,921,290 Maintenance 881,262 219,789 6,564,399 120,500 2,021,400 4,956,000 4,815,236 480,273 130,678 201,958 4,678,239 12,955,052 1,123,900 219,000 2.259.328 36-18 a ,- -I LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT* LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri. This area is within the Arkansas River, Little River, and White River basins. In the Arkansas River Basin, the District is responsible for planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation (MCKARNS ). The District is also responsible for the areas included in the Arkansas River drainage basin from above Pine Bluff, AR, to below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. In Littie River Basin, the District is responsible for the portion of the Little River and its tributaries that are in the state of Arkansas above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In the White River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of MCKARNS. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation ................................................. ........... 2 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, And KS .......... 2 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock & Dam (No.9), AR........ 3 3. Mcclellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Ar ...................................... . .. 3 4. David D. Terry Lock And Dam (No. 6), AR........ 3 5. Emmett Sandcrs Lock And Dam, AR............ 3 6. James W. Trimble Lock And Dam (No. 13), AR. 3 7. Lock No. 2 And Wilbur D. Mills (No. 2), AR...... 4 8. Joe Hardin Lock And Dam (No. 3), AR............ 4 9. Lock And Dam No. 5, AR ............. .... 4 10. Murray Lock And Dam (No. 7), AR................ 4 II1. Norrell Lock And Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR ................................... ..... 4 12. Toad Suck Ferry Lock And Dam (No. 8), AR...... 5 13. Maintenance And Repair Fleet And Marine Term inals, A r....................... .............. ....... 5 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. 5 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.... 5 Flood Control ....................... ................ 5 16. Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO............................. 5 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR........................ ..... 5 18. Clearwater Lake, M O..................................... . 5 19. Dequeen Lake, AR...................................... 6 20. Dierks Lake, AR .......................... ..... 6 21. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR................ 6 22. Gillham Lake, AR............................. . 7 23. Little River Basin, AR ........................................ 7 24. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR .................................. 7 25. Millwood Lake, AR...................................... 7 26. Nimrod Lake, AR .................................... 8 27. White River Basin (Little Rock District), AR & MO ...................... ... ... ....... 28. White River, Batesville, AR ................. ......... 8 29. White River, Jacksonport, AR ...................... . 9 30. Inspection Of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... ...... 9 31. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. 9 32. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization ....................................... ................ 9 lMultiple-Purpose Projects Including Power .................. 9 33. Beaver Lake, AR........................................ 9 34. Bull Shoals Lake, AR ......................................... 10 35. Dardanelle Lock And Dam (No. 10), AR ........... 11 36. Greers Ferry Lake, AR......... ............................. 11 37. Norfork Lake, AR..................... .................. 11 38. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), AR .................................. 12 39. Table Rock Lake, MO ... ............................... 12 General Investigations .............................................. 13 40. Surveys .................................. .1.3.......... 41. Preconstruction Engineering & Design (PED)... 13 42. Collection And Study Of Basic Data .................. 13 43. Nimrod Fisheries Restoration .............11.4............ 44. Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure, Desha County, AR ..................... 14 45. Coleman Creek Little Rock, AR ............1.4............ 46. Spadra Creek, Clarksville, AR......................... 14 47. Highway 69 Bridge at Black River, Jackson County, AR ..................... ....... .... 1 4 48. Rockaway Beach at Lake Taneycomo Aquatic Habitat Restoration, MO............................ 14 49. Pine Bluff Wetland Restoration................... ..... 15 50. Beaver Tailwater Restoration ............................. I 51. Slack Water Harbor, Russellville, AR................. 16 Table 37-A Cost And Financial Statement............. 16 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ................................ 20 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects............ ...... ....... ............... 22 Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................................... 23 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects....................... 24 Table 37-H Arkansas River Basin: AR, OK, and KS: Navigation ....................... 25 Table 37-1 Arkansas River Basin: AR, OK, and KS: Lakes ......................................... 28 Table 37-J Little River Basin, AR: Lakes ................ 29 Table 37-K White River Basin; AR, and MO: Lakes ............................................... 29 37-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. The headwaters for the Arkansas River are in the Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO. The river flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join the Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. The MCKARNS provides navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation improvements in the Arkansas River Basin. The MCKARNS provides a navigation channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long. The channel begins at the mouth of the White River, which enters the Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on the Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles to the mouth of the Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up the Verdigris River to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with a total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple purpose projects that include hydropower. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for the Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for the Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River Entrance Channel. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, in the states of Kansas and Oklahoma, and two are in the Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 37-H and 37-I, Navigation: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS. Local cooperation. For MCKARNS, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear the increased costs of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa- Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark, and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood damages prevented by Little Rock District projects in the Arkansas River Basin during FY00 are estimated at $8,047,800; flood losses prevented through FY00 are estimated at $852,210,600. Approximately 11.9 million tons of commerce were moved on the Arkansas portion of the MCKARNS during calendar year 2000. Details of the MCKARNS and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were the city of Plainview, AR, 103 acre-feet from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. (See Tables 37-H and 37-1, Navigation: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS, for status for individual items, navigation projects, lakes, and basin plan.) Work continues on the Arkansas River project in this District including construction of the Montgomery Point Lock & Dam, a meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, and land acquisition studies. Installation of tow haulage equipment was completed at David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Lock and Dam No. 5, Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4), and Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3) in 1994, at Norrell Lock (Lock 1) and Lock No. 2 in 1997, and Murray Lock (No. 7) in 1998. Montgomery Point Lock and Dam: Montgomery Point Lock and Dam (MPLD) is being constructed one half mile upstream from the Mississippi River, on the White River Entrance Channel, the first reach in the MCKARNS. Declining water surface elevations on the Mississippi River have been observed on the Mississippi river for a number of years, resulting in navigation restrictions on the White River. Construction of the MPLD would allow control of the water level in the entrance channel, which would maintain the reliability of the navigation system. A construction contract for MPLD was awarded to the joint venture of J. A. Jones and Guy F. Atkinson Construction Companies on 21 July 1997 for $186M. A notice-to-proceed was issued on 26 August 1997 and the contractor began mobilization on 23 September 1997 An electric utility service contract completed construction in January 1999 of a power line to the project. Interim electric rates were signed with C&L Electric Cooperative on 24 March 1999, and the power line was 37-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT energized in May 1999. Electric rates have been agreed upon only on an interim basis. A motion to request scheduling of a hearing before the Arkansas Public Service Commission(APSC) was filed on 17 May 2000 and served upon C&L Electric's counsel; APSC has not set the hearing date yet. To assist the towing industry, a tow haulage system will be installed on the lock. The design has begun and is scheduled for completion in FY 2001. Additional funds in the range of $18-23 million will be needed in FY01 to continue with construction as scheduled. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO.9), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Rockefeller Lake (pool 9) has four developed parks that in FY00experienced public visitation exceeding 0.7 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986 and was completed in September 1987. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower project, under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, was completed and placed into operation m August 1993. Construction of a widened downstream entrance was completed in 1998. Installation of tow haulage equipment was complete in 1999. 3. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on the Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining the Arkansas and White rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of the MCKARNS. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the FY 81 Anal Report. Federal cost is $119,300,184 for the existing project in the Little Rock District. 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and the lock and dam project was placed in operation in August 1968. Tow haulage equipment was added in June 1993. Currently, the project has two developed parks which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 2.9 million visitor-hours. 5. EMMETT SANDERS LOCK AND DAM, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 4 has two developed parks, which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.9 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and the lock and dam project was placed in operation in December 1968. Construction of a 40-foot wide, 9,600-foot long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam was completed in July 1995. The Corps of Engineers, as the Federal agency, has jurisdiction and custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 [Public Law 2810]). The project was 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Tow haulage equipment was placed into operation in June 1993. 6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 13), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY00, the project's three developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.0 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and the lock and dam were placed in operation in April 1969. The bridge across the dam was completed in July 1968. Construction of a non- Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in November 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The contract to install tow haulage equipment was awarded in December 1998. 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 7. LOCK NO. 2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS (NO. 2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section I.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Wilbur D. Mills has five developed parks, which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.0 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. The lock was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from a barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY85. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood showed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. A contract to extend the stilling basin was awarded in June 1990 and completed in FY94. Project costs are estimated at $21.6 million. A contract was awarded in September 1995 to add tow haulage equipment at Lock No. 2. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower project, under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is complete and was placed into operation in December 1999.. 8. JOE HARDIN LOCK AND DAM (NO. 3), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 3 has three developed parks which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.3 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and the lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed and operational in 1993. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operation and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 5 has two developed parks which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.7 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and the lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed in June 1993. 10. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Murray has five developed parks, which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.0 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. Construction of a non- Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in May 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 11. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Recommended modification. The White River Entrance Channel is the first reach in the MCKARNS project. This is the only reach in the navigation system where the minimum stage is controlled by the stages of the Mississippi River and not by a downstream dam. Water surface elevations on the Mississippi River have been declining for years due to changed hydraulic conditions and riverbed elevations, resulting in inadequate navigation depths in the White River Entrance Channel. Construction of the Montgomery Point Lock and Dam would eliminate the navigation restrictions. The new lock and dam will include "bottom" operated gates and a lock chamber of 600 feet by 110 feet with miter gates. The navigation pass over the dam (gates down) will be approximately 77 percent of the time for present conditions and 64 percent of the time for future conditions. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. The project currently 37-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT has one developed park which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.7 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963, and the lock and dam were placed in operation in June 1967. A contract to add tow haulage equipment to the lock was completed in 1997. 12. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY00, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.0 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. The Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to the city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. Installation of tow haulage equipment was complete in 1999. 13. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of the Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 37-C for other authorized navigationl projects.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Expenditures for Sec. 107 activities in FY00 totaled $22,410.77. Coordination account, $11,826.42 Russellville Harbor, Arkansas River, AR; $10,584.35. Flood Control 16. BLACK RIVER, POPLAR BLUFF, MO Location. The project is located along the Black River, in Poplar Bluff, MO, about 160 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. The project consists of a 1,200- foot long, 3-foot high, reinforced concrete floodwall and stop-log structure. Total project cost was $470,000 with the Federal share at $333,900 and the non-federal share at $136,100. Construction was authorized under the Continuing Authorities Program, Section 205, Flood control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. The project cooperation agreement was signed December 2, 1996. The local sponsor was the city of Poplar Bluff. Operations and results during fiscal year. The O&M manual was completed and provided to the city. The project was financially closed-out in June 2000. 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-1: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost was approximately $5.1 million. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of the 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $522,700; cumulative benefits through September 30, 2000, are estimated at $28,183,900. The project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of the project began in May 1940 and it was placed in operation in March 1947. 18. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost, including the cost of modifying the project, is estimated at $22.4 million. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. Major rehabilitation. Construction began in November 1987 on a seepage berm on the upstream face of 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land was acquired to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood with water surface at the top of existing dam and parapet wall, preventing waves from overtopping the dam. The cost of the modification was $11,467,910. Construction was complete in September 1989. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FYO0 are estimated at $724,500; cumulative benefits through September 2000 are estimated at $182,012,200. Project currently has 6 developed parks, which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.8 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for improvements to the sanitary facilities in the recreation areas. Construction of the project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. A new water control plan is being considered that better meets the needs of the interests in the basin. Objections by the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission during the review of the Draft Environmental Assessment has delayed progress on implementation of the proposed plan. 19. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, RM 22.8, a tributary of the Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. Existing project. An earth-fill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 acre-feet for flood control storage, 25,500 acre-feet for conservation storage, and 9,400 acre-feet for sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of the project is estimated at $19,623,752. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $239,500; cumulative benefits through September, 2000, are estimated at $8,985,500. In FY00, the project's six developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966. Project was placed in useful operation in August 1977. 20. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, RM 56.6, a tributary of the Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. Existing project. An earth-fill dam, 2,760 feet long, and about 153 feet above the streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at the west end of the dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24 -inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. The Federal cost of the project was $16,002,903. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $116,200; cumulative benefits through September 2000, are estimated at $5,458,300. Currently have three developed parks, which in FY00 experienced 0.8 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. In May 1975, the embankment closure was completed and the project was placed in useful operation. 21. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in the vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662), consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. This work was physically completed February 1996. Authorization also included the acquisition of 1,750 acres of bottom- Slands and nature appreciation facilities. The ASA(CW) declined to include the bottomland acquisition when the Sproject was authorized. In 1996, that decision was re- 37-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT versed. A decision document is to be prepared to determine whether to budget for including the bottomland acquisition. An environmental baseline study was completed in FY 98 to delineate between potential HTRW sites and clean areas within the bottomlands prior to any acquisitions. The estimated project cost is $33,300,000; Federal, $22.7 million; non-Federal $10.6 million. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1987. Operations and results during the fiscal year.. A project study plan for the decision document was prepared for SWD approval based on HQ guidance provided August 2000 for the acquisition of the 1,750 acres of Fourche bottomlands and nature appreciation areas. 22. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on the Cossatot River, RM 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham in Sevier County, AR. Existing project. Federal cost of the project was $17,827,111. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $247,200; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $11,946,100. In FY00, the project's four developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in May 1975, and the project was placed in useful operation. 23. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR Location. Improvements are on the Little River and tributaries in Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 37-J. Existing project. A six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on thRe olling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River; and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Flood damages prevented by the Little River Basin reservoirs during FY00 are estimated at $907,500; cumulative benefits through September, 2000, are estimated at $39,298,400. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: The; Tri-Lakes Water District, AR, 1,401 acre-feet from Gillham Lake; Tri-Lakes Water District, AR, 390 acre-feet from Dierks Lake; Tri-Lakes Water District, AR, 276 acre-feet from DeQueen Lake, and Southwest Arkansas Water District, AR, 80,444 acre-feet from Millwood Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, De- Queen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 24. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The project was constructed under Section 205 of the Continuing Authority Program. The project included improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. Project construction was completed in November 1992. The estimated project cost is $8,959,300: $4,843,000, Federal and $4,116,300, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Fort Smith, the local sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in November 1988.The city assumed project operation and maintenance on 17 June 1993. 25. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On the Little River, RM 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. Existing project. The Federal cost of the project was $46,087,382. 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $304,600; cumulative benefits through September, 2000, are estimated at $12,908,500. Millwood Lake has 12 developed parks which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.2 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. 26. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,092,825. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. In FY00, seven parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.9 million visitor-hours. During FY00, flood damages prevented are estimated at $547,700; cumulative benefits through September, 2000, are estimated at $19,902,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 27. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on the White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 37-K: White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the White River Basin. The plan includes seven lakes; two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. The Bell Foley project, the remaining unbuilt authorized project, was reevaluated in FY 89; the project continues to have a favorable benefitto- cost ratio since its formulation in 1968. The lakes in the plan are listed in Table 37-K: White River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin lakes during FY00 are estimated at $8,330,000; cumulative benefits through September, 2000, are estimated at $548,375,600. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin levees during FY00 are estimated at $980,400; cumulative benefits through September 2000, are estimated at $86,607,000. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during FY00 totaled 1.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 29,038 acrefeet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,519 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; and, 14,519 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, AR, 46,154 acre-feet, and Carroll-Boone Water District, AR, 8,199 acre-feet, from Beaver Lake; Madison County Water District, AR, 2,631 acre-feet, and Benton-Washington Counties Water District, AR, 5,707 ac-ft, from Beaver Lake; Kings River Country Club, 35 ac-ft, from Table Rock Lake; Marion County Regional Water District, AR, 920 acre-feet from Bull Shoals Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No.3 of Mountain Home, AR, 4,284 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; and the city of Clinton, AR, 2,140 acre-feet; Community Water System, Inc., AR, 4,271 acre-feet; Red Apple Inn, AR, 137 ac-ft; and, Thunderbird Country Club, AR, 43 ac-ft, from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress 0n these lakes is shown in individual reports. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. A new water control plan was approved and implemented in December 1998. This plan was developed in close coordination with the basins various interests and was recommended as their preferred plan of operation. 28. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR Location. On the White River, within the city of Batesville, Independence County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Repod (DPR), recommending construction of a levee ad 37-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT floodwall to protect the industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, was approved in June 1988. The project includes 4,855 feet of levee/floodwall, 9 stoplog structures, 6 drainage structures, a stoplog storage area, 3 sewerline control gates, and a two-gage automated warning system.. The levee/floodwall construction contract was awarded in July 1995 and completed in Dec 1996. The levee/floodwall was transferred to the city of Batesville for operation and maintenance March 14, 1997. However, in Aug. 1999, it was determined that erosion to the bank and at two drainage structure culverts required a design deficiency correction. Estimated total project cost is $3.96 million with a Federal share of 2.97 million. Local cooperation. The city of Batesville signed a local cooperation agreement in January 1994 with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The city's project share is estimated to be $990,000. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The erosion correction design was completed and the announcement for construction was made in Dec. 2000. 29. WHITE RIVER, JACKSONPORT, AR Location. On the left bank, of the White River at RM 256 between Newport and Jacksonport, Jackson County, AR. Existing project. 300 feet of revetment was added to the existing revetment which protected the Massey- Alexander Levee (formerly known as Jackson County Levee District No. 2) under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The project cost was estimated at $123.600 with a Federal share of $92.700. The construction started August 1996 and was completed December 1996. Local cooperation. The Massey-Alexander Levee District signed a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) in September 1995. An additional 535 feet of revetment was added, as a betterment, to protect a natural gas Pipeline at the local sponsor's expense of $206,000. The sponsor assumed operation of the project in No- Vember 1997. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of Completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Costs for FY00 were $100,769.54. Total accumulative cost through September, 1999, was $2,218,182.08. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 37-E: Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.) 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act. FY00 costs, Federal $136,689.75; Section 14, Coordination Account, $15,363.32; Batesville Water Tower, AR, project was completed 24 July 2000, at a project cost of $513,100 with a Federal share of $333,515, FY00 Federal funds $30,905.09; Beaver Creek at Slough Hollow, MO, Federal $74,934.29; and Highway 69 at Black River, Jackson, Federal $15,487.05 (2) Snagging and clearing, Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: None. (3) Flood control activities, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. FY00 costs, $254,989.46: Section 205 Coordination Account, $13,514.81; Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., $6,459.43; White River, Batesville, AR, $87,592.95; Brodie Creek, Little Rock, AR, $0.57; Spadra Creek, Clarksville, AR, . $48,070.31; Dark Hollow, North Little Rock, AR, $9,022.60; Coleman Creek, Little Rock, AR, $9,938.68; Crooked Creek, Bryant, AR, $1,069.86; Clear Creek, Pierce City, MO, $4,696.98; Jam Up Creek, Mountain View, MO, $683.07; Mill Creek, AR, $6,963.11; Lone Star Water Management Project, $49,078.69; Cypress Creek, Perry, AR, $17,898.40. Emergency Response Activities (1) Public Law 84-99 (Flood Control and Coastal Emergency): None (2) Emergency Work for Others: None for FY00. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 33. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K. White River Basin.) 17-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. (For authorization see Table 37-B. ) Major rehabilitation. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone fouhdation under Dike 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement was a concrete seepage cutoff in Dike 1 and the north end of the main dam. A $16.9-million contract to construct a concrete cutoff wall was awarded in June 1989; the notice to proceed was issued in October 1989. The contract period was estimated to be 760 days. However, the contractor ceased productive work due to inability to excavate rock and was been placed in default. An $18.8 reprocurement contract was awarded in April 1992. Work began in May 1992 and all work was completed in Nov 1995. Project cost is estimated at $26,588,000 million. The Beaver Dam Safety Assurance study was completed with FY 97 expenditures of $1,359.61. Water Quality Enhancement. Congress directed the Corps to implement best management practices (BMP's) in the Beaver Lake watershed and monitor the effects of these practices on water quality. A study was completed and a project report was approved in July 1989. The BMP's and water quality monitoring were concurrently implemented over a 5-year period which began in May 1991 with a project completion date of July 1997. The BMP's were implemented under the terms of a memorandum of agreement between the Corps and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly the Soil Conservation Service, with the assistance of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. The water quality monitoring was implemented under terms of a local cost-sharing agreement with the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Water quality monitoring was performed in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency by a Corps administered contract. The water quality-monitoring contract was awarded on January 29, 1992. Water quality sampling began in May 1992 and was completed on July 1, 1996. BMP implementation was completed August 31,1995. Cost in FY98 was $67,897.93 Federal, and $1,434.58 non-Federal. Total project cost was $6,878,775.15 Environmental Infrastructure Assistance. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the Corps of Engineers to provide design and construction assistance to appropriate non-Federal interests for a water transmission line from the northern part of Beaver Lake, Arkansas, into Benton and Washington Counties. This project is part of a $40 million project, which includes a water intake, treatment and storage facilities, and transmission lines. The project sponsor is the Benton/Washington County Water Association, and the primary source of funding is the Rural Economic and Community Development Service (formerly the Farmers Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture). The Little Rock District and the project sponsor executed a Memorandum of Agreement in June 1997. The Little Rock District then transferred $3 million to the sponsor for construction of a segment of the water transmission line. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act, and the 1958 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $712,900; cumulative benefits are estimated at $38,779,300. During the year 90,256,100 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has eleven developed parks, which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 20.2 million visitor-hours. An agreement to provide 21,972.14 acre-feet of storage at no charge to the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission for fish production facilities was sent to HQ for approval in July 2000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, and reduce the maintenance effort or rehabilitate the 26-year old park operation through operation and maintenance and SRUF funds, as appropriate. Construction of the project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Work on a dam seepage problem is complete. 34. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. (See table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Cost with eight generating units was $88,858,711. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $3,247,800; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $150,790,000. During the year, more than 301,489,000 37-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has eighteen developed parks, which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 26.1 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Alterations to existing parks are needed to enhance fee collections, to improve efficiency, to reduce maintenance effort or to rehabilitate the 37-year-old park facilities through operations and maintenance or SRUF funds, as appropriate. Low dissolved oxygen readings in the downstream area of Bull Shoals Dam in October 1990 have resulted in ongoing studies to be undertaken to minimize harmful effects on the trout fishing of the White River. Unguaranteed short-term solutions to the problem, consisting of limiting generation, will sustain the existing fishery, but long-term guaranteed changes will require congressional authorization. Construction of the project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. Major rehabilitation (Powerhouse). A major rehabilitation study was initiated in October 1995. The study was to investigate a solution to the environmentally induced reliability problem (low dissolved oxygen) of these units. Potential solutions include new autoventing turbines, a down stream weir, turbine venting, or forced-air. Following preliminary study results, the turbines were modified in 1997 to increase downstream aeration. The study has been suspended while the effects of these modifications are evaluated. 35. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR Location. (See Table 37-H. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of MCKARNS. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spill- Way with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse originally contained four 31,000-kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acrefeet. Estimated cost was $84,270,124. Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Power generation Coltined. During FY00, about 480,321,000 kilowatthours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY00, the project's thirteen developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 7.2 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line in April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. The lock became operable in December 1969. The Visitors Center and resident office were completed in May 1985. The contract to install tow haulage equipment was awarded in December 1998. Major rehabilitation. Major Rehabilitation of the power plant was completed in August 2000. Turbines were replaced and generators were rewound to increase plant capacity by 13 percent. Cost of the Major Rehabilitation was $28.8 million. 36. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K.: White River, AR & MO. ) Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2, 1938 Flood Control Act and 1988 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $1,010,300; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $29,613,900. In FY00, 80,411,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has seventeen developed parks, which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 29.2 million visitor-hours. The project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including water quality, aesthetic value, forestry, fish and wildlife are managed and protected for future generations. An allvolunteer environmental program (annual cleanup) has been most successful and serves as a model for the Nation. During the past 27 years the program has won more than 26 national awards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of the project began in June 1957 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in January 1962. Power units 1 and 2 were operable in March and May 1964, and water supply was operable in April 1971. The Visitors Center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of $813,000. 37. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. The total estimated cost is $70,701,629, including highway bridge construction. This does not include an estimate for the addition of power units 3 and 4, which were authorized, but never built. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $897,500; total cumulative flood damages prevented through September 2000, are estimated at $49,409,500. During the year, more than 66,345,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy was delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project's 18 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 15.4 million visitor-hours during FY00. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 38. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), AR Location. (See Table 37-H: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of MCKARNS. The dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed; spillway has 15 tainter gates, each 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acrefeet. In addition, one foot of power pondage is provided in Pool 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Cost was $85,629,412. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Local cooperation. (See section i.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Delivered 277,240,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Ozark Lake has 10 developed parks which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.3-million visitorhours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964. Project is complete. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973; and unit 5, May 1974. A major rehabilitation study was initiated in October 1996. The powerplant has experienced numerous mechanical problems and major repair requirements since its construction. The study describes the condition of the powerplant and reviews alternative solutions. The Rehabilitation Study Report was submitted in March 1999; it was removed from the 2001 budget. Funding is being sought for inclusion of the Report in the 2002 budget 39. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Cost was $119,491.90. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Dam Safety (Assurance). Table Rock Dam has a hydrologic deficiency. The Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) would overtop the dam more than 5 feet and would breach the earthen embankment portion of the dam, causing catastrophic flood conditions. An auxiliary gated spillway to safely pass the PMF is currently under construction. The project is being built in two major phases. The first phase contract was awarded in March 1999 and consists of the excavation of the approach channel, foundation grouting, and the construction of a portion of the earthen embankment. The second phase contract will be awarded in June 2000 and will consist of the major dam construction (including bridge, gates, concrete, etc...) and the excavation of the approach channel. The total estimated project cost is $60.2 million. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY00 are estimated at $1,737,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $97,770,700. During the year, about 232,300,000 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The District and the Waterways Experiment Station are investigating the possibilities of improving the quality o0f Table Rock releases with a hypolimnetic oxygenation 37-12 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT system. Table Rock Lake has fifteen developed parks which in FY00 experienced public visitation exceeding 20 million visitor-hours. This project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including forestry, fish and wildlife, are managed and protected for future generations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954. The project was ready for beneficial flood control use in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. UniteI a -d, 4 i -Adl d ii Aauil--u d 1961 L s a wcI rceU c II r111 al 1 General Investigations 40. SURVEYS Expenditures for surveys $1,136,913.64. ect is channel modification that will include replacement of the tunnel under the Redwood Street area within the city limits of North Little Rock. Congress provided $250,000 in Federal funds for FY 2000 and $375,000 in FY 2001. Contributed funds in FY 2000 were $83,000 and $125,000 in FY 2001. (2) Reservoirs: Pine Mountain Lake, AR, $550.10. 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Total expenditures in FY00 were $429,986.33. (1) Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS): Expenditures for FPMS activities in FY00 totaled $429,986.33. National Flood Proofing Committee, $80,832.57; Flood Plain Management Services, $115,052.18; Technical Services, $78,495.80; Quick Responses, $10,000; SS - Elkins, AR FW, $67.44; SS - in FY00 totaled Hollister, MO, $264.82; SS - Forsyth, MO, $42.54; SS - Farmington,AR, $59,980.50; SS - Fayetteville, AR, $t1c6 - c4cS W hinctt n Cntn,. AR $'252 78 5fZ. CC (1) Flood damage prevention studies, FY00 expenditures, $315,254.85: Arkansas River, Fort Smith, AR, $16,128.92; May Branch, Ft. Smith, AR, Reconnaissance Study, FY00 Federal funds expenditures were $19,626.70; May Branch, Ft. Smith, AR, Feasibility Study, FY00 Federal funds expenditures were $279,499.23 . (2) Miscellaneous activities. FY00 expenditures, $ 55,360.01: Special investigations, $35,398.26; Review of FERC Licenses, $3,554.46; Interagency Water Resource Development, $14,436.30; North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $1,970.99. (3) Coordination with Other Agencies and Non-Fed., FY00 expenditures, $73,181.30: Cooperation w/other Water Agencies, $5,975.74. Planning Assistance to States (PAS): Negotiation Funds, $1,518.30; Black and Arkansas Rivers, AR $112.23; Monett, MO, Flood Hazard Study, $26,991.56; Willow Spring, MO, Flood Hazard Study, $4.34; Conway, AR Water Supply Study, $16,392.42; and Little Red River, AR Water Supply, $22,186.71. 41. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (PED). Total PED expenditures in FY00 were $175,703.92. (1) Local Protection: Arkansas River, Tucker Creek, FY00 costs were $807.86. FY00 expenditures for North Little Rock, AR, Dark Hollow were $174,345.96. PED activities including a Limited Reevaluation Report for the Dark Hollow project were initiated in FY 2000. A Design Cost-Sharing Agreement was executed on 30 May 2000 with the City of North Little Rock. The proj- 4iU'.t7 , L) -V Q311116LUi1 .U U , flL-)N , , .I ;U.I.J,- IBranson, MO, $19,960.72; SS-Ozark, MO, $39,845.22. The authority for the Flood Plain Management Services program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Under the authority of Section 321 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, PL 101-640, technical services and planning assistance are (1) provided to states and local governments without charge and (2) offered to Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Through these technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation of flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. (2) Hydrologic Data Collection: During FY00, 115 stations were operated; 79 cooperatively with USGS and 36 by the Corps. (3) Environmental Restoration (Section 1135): Total FY00 expenditures were $279,187.10, including the Coordination Account, $18,373.48; Initial Appraisals, $19,210.05; Morgan Point Bendway Closure, $121,910.51; the Nimrod Fisheries Restoration, $28,718.48; Beaver Lake Tailwater Habitat Restoration, 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 $21,859.39; Collins Creek Trout Fishery, $43,227.74; 45. COLEMAN CREEK LITTLE ROCK, and Pine Bluff Wetland Restoration, $25,887.74. AR (4) Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206): Total FY00 expenditures were $53,826.71, including the Coordination Account, $14,229.63; Preliminary Restoration Plans, $17,349.38; and Rockaway Beach, $22,247.70. 43. NIMROD FISHERIES RESTORATION Location. Nimrod Lake is located about 9 miles southeast of Plainview, Arkansas, in Yell County, on the Fourche LaFave River at river mile 62.6. Existing Project. The project consisted of revegetating the shoreline, adding fish shelters, and manipulating the water level management plan. Total project costs were $106,800 with the federal share being $80,100 and the non-federal share being $26,100. Local Cooperation. The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission was the local sponsor. . Results during the fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 2000 and the project was turned over to the local sponsor. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was financially closed-out. 44. MORGAN POINT BENDWAY CLOSURE STRUCTURE, DESHA COUNTY, AR Location. This project is located immediately downstream of the non-overflow embankment of the Wilbur D. Mills Dam of the MCKARNS, in Desha County (Southeastern Arkansas). Existing project. The project modification report was approved in September 1995 under Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended: Environmental Restoration. The report recommended construction of a closure structure at the downstream end of the bendway, placement of a water intake structure, cypress tree plantings and placement of fish shelters. The project is intended to restore about 7 miles of riverine and wetland habitat damaged by the construction and operation of the Wilbur D. Mills Dam. Local cooperation. The state of Arkansas is the sponsor with a cost share of 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction on the project was initiated on 2 November 1998. The construction contract was physically complete on 30 September 1999. Fish stocking and tree planting project components have been completed. The city of Little Rock asked the Corps of Engineers to investigate the flooding problems along Coleman Creek in west-central Little Rock residential area, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Funds were received and a study initiated in FY99. The study effort is ongoing. 46. SPADRA CREEK, CLARKSVILLE, AR The mayor of Clarksville asked the Corps of Engineers to study flooding problems under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. A study was initiated in FY99 to consider alternative plans for extending and/or raising an existing levee. The study is ongoing, and a Detailed Project Report (DPR) is expected to be completed in FY01. 47. HIGHWAY 69 BRIDGE AT BLACK RIVER, JACKSON COUNTY, AR The Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, the sponsor, requested the assistance of the Corps of Engineers during FY 99 to investigate riverbank erosion along the left bank of the Black River at the Highway 69 bridge under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Construction was completed in August 2000 with the repair of a county road damaged during construction. This bank stabilization project was accepted by its sponsor for operation and maintenance in Dec. 2000. The project cost was $277,230 with a non- Federal share of $97,030. 48. ROCKAWAY BEACH AT LAKE TANEYCOMO AQUATIC HABITAT RESTORATION, MISSOURI The City of Rockaway Beach, Missouri requested the Corps of Engineers under the authority of Section 206, to investigate the restoration of aquatic habitat in Lake Taneycomo adjacent to the City of Rockaway. $50,000 in Federal funds were expended in the Planning Design and Analysis phase of this project in FY 2000. The proposed project includes removal and replacement of an existing causeway, excavation around the city shoreline and placement of aerators to improve the aquatic habitat in the area. 49. PINE BLUFF WETLAND RESTORATION Location: The proposed Pine Bluff Wetland Restoration Project will be located in Pine Bluffs Regional Park on about 130 acres designated for the future Pine 37-14 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Bluff Nature Center. Existing Project: The proposed modifications consists of constructing a 2-acre wetland, creating three food plot areas, and reforesting about 9 acres. Total project costs is estimated at $366,600 with the federal share estimated at $275,000 and the nonfederal share estimated at $91,600. Local Cooperation: The local sponsor is the city of Pine Bluff. Results during the Fiscal Year: The current plan submitted to SWD in November 2000 was not approved due to the high cost per acre. Condition at end of fiscal year: The project will be terminated. 50. BEAVER TAILWATER RESTORATION Location: The project area is located immediately below Beaver Dam along the White River in Carroll County, Arkansas. Existing Project: The proposed modification consists of restoring 2 miles of channel and banks of the upper White River damaged by high flows from releases in Beaver Lake. The modification consists of constructing and placing in the river channel 60 in-stream habitat structures, three log crib retaining walls, and one stone weir deflection structure. The estimated cost of the project is $120,000 with the federal sharing being $90,000 and the non-federal share being $30,000. Local Cooperation: The local sponsor is the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission. Results during the Fiscal Year: The PCA was executed on September 6, 2000. Condition at end of Fiscal Year: Contract award was scheduled for November 2000. 51. SLACK WATER HARBOR, RUSSELLVILLE, ARKANSAS Location: The recommended plan in the DPR consists of a slack water harbor located on the left de- Scending bank of the Arkansas River at navigation mile 202.6. Existing Project: The total project costs are estimated at $3,883,000 with the federal share estimated at $3,164,000 and the non-federal share estimated at $719,000. Local Cooperation: The local sponsor is the city of Russellville. 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 37-A Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 1.-15. McClellan-Kerr New Work Arkansas River Approp. 1,646,147 2,128,000 3,211,000 6,320,000 504,257,619 Navigation Cost 3,207,682 2,059,266 2,677,586 5,622,282 512,960,406 Locks & Dams, Maint. AR Approp. 18,863,000 18,562,277 21,639,832 19,810,093 481,948,577 2 Cost 17,216,514 21,055,570 22,011,013 20,013,159 481,835,409 ' New Work Contrib. - - 5,723,348 Cost - - 6,312,969 1. Montgomery New Work Point Lock & Dam Approp. 3,338,000 44,483,000 33,314,000 25,294,000 106,429,000 Cost 3,314,818 30,704,610 39,110,226 28,383,939 101,513,593 16. Black River New Work Poplar Bluff, MO Approp. Cost New work Contrib. Cost - 333,000 36,196 305,248 40,300 0 - 32,288 0 35,018 0 7,376 5,400 6,459 0 636 504,000 500,762 63,400 56,688 17. Blue Mountain New Work Lake, AR Approp. - - 5,069,974 Cost - - 5,069,974 Maint. Approp. 1,025,000 884,662 950,644 1,199,783 22,609,847 2 Cost 1,011,237 880,107 960,918 1,189,722 22,591,742 2 18. Cato Springs New Work Branch, Approp. -45,000 0 - 235,700 Fayetteville, AR Cost -5,000 201 - 235,700 New Work Contrib. 1,002 0 0 0 36,900 Cost 5,000 0 743 35 36,899 19. Clearwater Lake, New Work MO Approp. 10,406,300' Cost 10,406,300 ' Maint. Approp. 2,008,978 2,178,054 2,641,040 2,812,770 47,300,544 Cost 1,996,594 2,193,323 2,825,092 47,303,585 Major Rehab. Approp. 12,087,910 Cost 12,087,910 20. DeQueen Lake New Work Little River Approp. 19,629,753 Basin, AR Cost 19,623,752 Maint. Approp. 996,000 884,906 890,321 1,130,434 17,903,986 2 Cost 850,893 970,167 956,807 1,130,987 17,813,049 37-16 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 21. Dierks Lake, New Work 1,027,000 855,167 985,380 1,108,654 872,216 994,846 1,015,742 1,108,814 16,002,903 - 16,002,781 18,230,352 2 18,176,463 2 22. Dry Jordon New Work Creek, Approp. -40,000 -36,700 - - 157,500 Harrison, AR Cost 30,944 10 157,500 New Work Contrib. -- - - Cost - - 23. Fourche Bavou New Work Basin, Little Rock, AR 24. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 26. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR Nimrod Lake, AR 29. White River Basin, AR & MO (Little Rock District) Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 232,000 192,028 13,000 0 101,934 0 25,000 20,597,000 24,882 9,498 20,634,574 -1,731,678 1,717,768 S- - 17,827,111 - - - 17,827,111 960,000 662,228 749,468 941,336 16,495,468 2 651,664 941,833 802,776 940,757 16,519,466 2 300,000 -18,000 548 287,836 - -281,391 -281,391 - 4,900,001 2 - 4,764,419 2 299,261 299,261 - - - 46,087,382 - - - 46,087,382 1,781,000 1,488,369 1,557,982 2,019,659 42,984,163 2 1,770,389 1,562,375 1,643,683 2,019,168 43,132,768 - - 4,092,826 4,092,826 1,276,000 1,317,095 1,296,213 1,696,196 28,468,038 1,123,501 1,441,733 1,304,019 1,683,745 28,435,533 342,618,387 342,439,802 455,085,012 454,690,932 24,184,548 23790468 37-17 Little River Basin, AR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost ---~~ 27. 28. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 30. White River, New Work Batesville, AR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 160,000 -48,000 60,600 80,000 454,832 33,232 94,680 87,593 7,006 0 990 2,828,009 2,850,309 184,472 182,468 31. White River, New Work Jacksonport, Approp. -5,000 -10,000 0 - 92,691 AR Cost 56,647 1,318 64 - 92,692 New Work Contrib. - -84,473 0 - 233,027 Cost 177,361 2,418 39 - 233,027 35. Beaver Lake, New Work AR Approp. - - - - 46,183,033 Cost - - 46,183,033 Maint. Approp. 3,792,400 3,810,120 4,023,097 4,374,228 82,441,557 Cost 3,632,443 4,108,798 4,105,375 4,376,412 82,664,739 Major Rehab. Approp. -32,147 - - 33,571,573 Cost 1,360 - - - 27,410,331 35. Beaver Lake, New Work Water Quality Approp. 12,000 0 0 - 4,304,000 Cost 67,876 0 3 - 4,282,001 New Work Contrib. 1,390 0 - - 557,406 Cost 1,415 20 - - 540,123 35. Beaver Lake, New Work Infrastructure 36. Bull Shoals Lake, AR 37. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10) AR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 0 2,965,847 0 3,633 0 8,379 5,076,000 4,402,706 4,233,269 5,212,919 5,044,334 4,553,436 4,299,353 5,235,347 - 3,000,000 - 2,999,957 - 88,857,611 88,857,611 118,934,504 2 119,142 080 - - - 84,270,124 84,261,240 6,150,500 6,608,568 5,802,930 4,895,415 117,911,505 6,397,614 7,413,260 5,955,972 4,910,219 118,147,3282 5,216,000 5,217,000 8,454,000 3,523,000 27,311,000 5,261,790 5,183,761 8,236,885 3,127,132 26648,488 37-18 37-18 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 38. Greers Ferry New Work Lake, AR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 48,865,512 - 48,865,512 4,487,100 4,474,250 4,402,460 5,222,125 104,937,370 2 4,391,651 4,631,513 4,526,182 5,280,626 105,181,407 2 39. Norfork Lake, New Work AR Approp. - - 74,578,929 Cost -- - 70,701,629 Maint. Approp. 3,469,000 3,122,143 3,193,833 3,983,896 85,359,990 2 Cost 3,347,796 3,144,674 3,303,333 3,979,112 85,366,033 2 40. Ozark-Jeta New Work Taylor Lock & Approp. - - 85,629,412 Dam (No. 12), Cost - 85,629,412 AR Maint. Approp. 3,991,000 3,381,029 3,921,348 4,337,900 88,263,541 Cost 3,760,321 3,601,746 4,137,687 4,349,453 88,366,927 41. Table Rock Lake. New Work MO 45. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Ninrod Waterfowl Levee 46. Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure, Arkansas River New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,015,000 951,000 3,064,000 7,654,000 79,761,875 944,116 972,326 2,588,013 7,294,854 78,877,185 5,351,070 5,180,801 4,782,742 5,553,013 118,966,139 ' 5,377,651 6,060,460 4,951,928 5,553,096 120,041,647 ' 26,200 29,481 24,100 20,000 -100,000 52,861 270,700 0 1,569 0 3,152 0 891 0 57 0 2,707,000 -128,000 9,194 2,417,538 121,911 0 270,700 72,200 72,201 24,100 24,100 2,782,000 2,742,145 270,700 270,700 1. For more details on project funds, see text for individual projects. 2. Beginning data shown in Table 37-A includes special recreation use fees. 3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 4. Includes total project cost, including study cost. 37-19 1 -I -- I - - - ~- ~- - - ---- - ~I 45. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK June 30, 1948 Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. 37-20 Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Con., 1 sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong. 2d sess. LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-B (Continued) Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 June 10, 1948 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 24, 1946 Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all pervious authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 26 of text.) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 30 of text.) RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 26 of text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes Emergency streambank erosion protection, Red River, Little River Co., AR Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Sec. 401. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/14/88. H. Doc. 602, 79'" Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85 'h Cong., I" sess. Section 14, PL 79-526 WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 34 of text) June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Flood Control Com. Doc 1, 75"' Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 917, 76'h Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77'" Cong., 1"t sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 352, 87"' Cong., 2d sess. 37-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 37-B (Continued) Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents March 1, 1974 Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Flood Control Corn. Doc. 1, 75h Lake Cong., 1" sess. May 11, 1962 Environmental restoration of wetlands and fish and wild- Senate Report 102-344; Energy & life resources in the White River Basin. AR and MO. Water Development Appropriations (See Section 33 of text.) Act, 1993, PL 102-377 October 22, 1976 White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout Water Resources Development Act production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105. June 30, 1948 White River, Batesville, AR. Section 205, P.L. 80-858, construc- (See Section 35 of text.) tion be approved by ASA (CW). TABLE 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects For Last Federal Cost thru Sept. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR Black River, AR and MO' Current River, AR and MO 2 Upper White River, AR 4.5 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff)2.3 White River, Jacksonport, AR6 1988 1950 1964 1952 1950 1984 $736,869 80,000 17,0003 83,197 $930,324 132,178 1,788,374 785,666 43,110 Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R 8 H Act, as amended, (P.L.86-645). Channel adequate for existing commerce; completion not contemplated . Includes $7,000 for previous project. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Congress. Completed. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR; transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 37-22 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, ARI Inactive 1975 S1,432,116 Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Completed 1985 44,500 Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Completed 1958 84,315 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO Completed 1983 42,172 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Completed 1951 919,955 Arkansas River, AR Cato Springs, Fayetteville, AR Completed. 1996 426,000 Clarksville, AR Completed 1962 271,717 Conway County Drainage and Levee District Completed 1959 187,440 District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, Completed 1952 1,018,840 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee District No. 6, Completed 1952 390,952 Arkansas River, AR Crawford County Levee District, AR Completed 1983 53,506 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas Completed 1954 2,001,820 River, AR Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR Completed 1995 1,245,000 Curia Creek Drainage District, Completed 1983 1 17,898 Independence County, AR East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Completed 1958 304,699 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Completed 1941 99,5 1I Arkansas River, AR Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 1,077,546 From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR Completed 1954 845,300 (above Plum Bayou) Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR2 Cancelled 1973 22,890 Jackson County Levee District 2 Completed 1986 131,699 White River, AR Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR Completed 1983 198,096 Little Red River District 1, AR Completed 1988 28,968 Little Red River, White County Road Completed 1983 63,355 Bridge, Judsonia, AR Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Completed 1975 1,901,899 - Fourche Bayou, AR McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Completed 1950 422,549 Arkansas River, AR Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1953 198,069 Newport, White River, AR Completed 1941 314,276 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1958 512,001 Otter Creek and Tributaries Completed 1987 162,204 Shannon Hills, AR Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1966 84,350 - Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1991 88,379 Pine Mountain Lake, AR3 Inactive 1985 1,432,331 - Point Remove Levee and Drainage Completed 1983 86,943 - District, Conway County, AR Red River, 1-30, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 119,897 - Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 144,828 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 269,907 Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR Completed 1983 64,500 - 37-23 s~ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 37-E (Cont.) Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Completed 1964 1,404,852 Island to Pennington Bayou), AR South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Completed 1961 409,115 - Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Completed 1972 1,567,156 Levee Districts, AR4 Village Creek, Jackson and Inactive 1977 510,217 Lawrence Counties, AR5 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 White River, at Hwy 14, mile east Completed 1981 214,308 of Oil Trough, AR White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100 White River, Batesville Water TowerSec 14, AR Completed 1999 473,000 White River, Jacksonport, AR 6 Completed 1987 293,567 White River, Newport, AR Completed 1989 93,929 White River, St. Paul, AR Completed 1990 22,400 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & deferred in May '85; funded for reevaluation (draft report dated Sep '89). 2. Construction of project cancelled because local interests failed to provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance. 3 Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. 4. See H Doc 577.87th Cong for description. 5. Reclassified in Jun '77: local interests unable to meet local cooperation requirements; funded for reevaluation in FY 89; recommended to be placed in the inactive status. 6. Design deficiency correction to be completed 30 December 1996. TABLE 37-G Deauthorized Projects For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Crooked Creek Lake 1969 1990 & Levee, AR Lone Rock, Buffalo 1959 1977 $130,653 - River, AR Prosperity Lake, MO - 1989 864,000 - Water Valley, Eleven 1959 1977 414,011 - Point River, AR & MO 37-24 TABLE 37-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Sill Up- Upper Year stream Lock Pool Type of Opened to Tota from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Character of Kind of Construc- Naviga- Estimal Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam tion tion Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell Lock and Damn No.1 Entrance Channel Lock No. 2 Wilbur D. Mills Damn (No. 2) Joe Hardin Lock and SDam No. 3 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6) Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7) Toad Suck Fenrry Lock and Dam (No. 8) Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9) Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10) 8 east of AR Post, AR First 10.3 miles of system 6 east of AR Post, AR 3 southeast of AR Post, AR 5 north of Grady, 110 by 600 AR 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR 6 west of Conway, AR 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 2 northwest of Dardanelle, AR 110by600 30 max 20 norn 110 by 600 20 no 28 max 142 16 15 1967 $22,472,000 $ 43,649,000 162 18 14 1967 $ 70,266,000 1968 20 182 18 14 110 by 600 14 196 110 by 600 17 213 110 by 600 18 110 by 600 18 231 249 110 by 600 16 265 110 by 600 19 110 by 600 54 284 338 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 1968 $ 38,040,000 1968 $ 45,246,000 1968 $ 31,710,000 1968 $ 69,086,000 1969 $ 46,076,000 1969 $57,831,000 1969 $37,798,000 1969 $84,270,124 Lock and Dam No. 11 Deleted - - r Co-) H CH-) ted TABLE 37-H Cont. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Lock Elevation Depth on Miter Type of Total Up- Miles to Dimension Lift Upper Upper Lower Character of Kind of Construc- Year Estimat Feature stream Nearest Town (feet) (feet) Pool (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam tion Opened to Cost Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12) James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) TULSA DISTRICT James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (No. 15) Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No.16) Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17) Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18) 1 east of Ozark, AR 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 4 east of Redland, OK 1 north of Cowlington, OK I northwest of Gore, OK 4 northwest of Okay, OK 8 southwest of Inola, OK 110 by 600 34 372 110 by 600 20 392 110 by 600 20 412 110 by 600 110 by 600 48 30 110 by 600 21 110 by 600 21 460 490 511 532 18 15 18 14 14 15 18 14 19 16 15 14 15 14 1969 $85,629,412 1969 $58,816,000 1970 $6,858,000 1970 $32,655,000 1970 $94,578,237 1970 $83,738,277 1970 $31,619,000 1970 $44,355,000 ted t- -.hO O "TI til o rc trl 0 1< 0 o r rH 0 0 t71 ~r 0 VT1 ai a3 a) -- Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete ............. $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ................................... ................... 10,247,000 Total, Little Rock District ............... ............ 814,362,720 Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard) .................. Tulsa District Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete ............... ................... Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ......... ......................... 2,268,000 12,700,038 Upstream Lakes: Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete ............. ... ...................... . $ Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete ........... ...................... Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete ................................ ............ ......... Subtotal ............................... Total, Tulsa District ............. ........... Total Project Cost 96 percent complete....... ..... $ 1,419,908,121 2,750,000 Subtotal ................................... $309,253,552 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River, except Dam No. 2, is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas Rivet. 2. Details in Tulsa District report. -3, 46,722,329 123,170,773 124,130,747 294,023,849 603,277,401 rn C-) C,) H H fTABLE 3 7-H Con t ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NANIATO (See Section 1 of ext) Additional features entering into cost of project - --- TABLE 37-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Total Est Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Co. Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 --- 1947 $ 5,0 Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 --- 1948 11,2 Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 107 Earthfill 284,300 --- 1966 19,0 (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 123,7 Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 --- 1949 10,5 Fort Gibson, OK Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete- 1,284,400 45,000 1953 43,8 Keystone, OK Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 gravity 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,1 Markham Ferry, OK Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,9 Neodesha, KS Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 --- 0 Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Earthfill 336,010 --- 1942 4,0 * Oologah, OK Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Concrete- 1,519,000 --- 1974 37,0 Pensacola.OK Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 gravity 2,197,000 86,400 1940 Tenkiller Ferry, OK Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 25,9 Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Concrete arch 199,700 --- 1960 13,8 Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 --- 1949 10,6 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. 151,4 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS; Navigation (Table 28-H). 1,419,9 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 96 percent complete. 1,571,3 1.Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2.Cost included in navigation project. 3.Details in Tulsa District report. 4.Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dan (Lake ludson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5.lnactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6.Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. O timated z st 0 0..i )69,974 Z :09,834 Cl )52,990 a 95,907 g 50,873 21,405 O 71,173 08,756 M 97,910 > 92,826 29,928 ' 52,126 Z 63,540 2 96,324 ; 87,439 0 03,997 08,121 C 12,118 t o 0< TABLE37-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 26 of Text) Project River Site Nearest Town DeQueen Lake Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake Cossatot River 49 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake Little River 16 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. Co -3 C) -3 > cu I. For details see individual reports. 2. Inactive - placed in a defened status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. w TABLE 37-K WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES (See Section 34 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Total Estimated Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost Beaver' White 609 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 52,631,472 Bell Foley' Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 518,000 ---- 93,700,000 Bull Shoals' White 418.6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 Concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,356,000 Clearwater' Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 Earthfill 413,000 ---- 22,462,553 Greers Ferry' Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 Concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,000 Norfork' North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 Concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,624,000 Table Rock' White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,000 Total 15,580,000 828,550 503,132,025 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT* The civil works boundry of the Tulsa District includes an area of approximately 160,000 square miles covering Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are included in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas- Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Index, Arkansas. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects Flood Control 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas City, KS 5. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX 5a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX 5b. Area VIII, TX 5c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 6. Birch Lake, OK 7. Bowie County Levee, TX 8. Candy Lake, OK 9. Canton Lake, OK 10. Copan Lake, OK 11. Council Grove Lake, KS 12. El Dorado Lake, KS 13. Elk City Lake, KS 14. Fall River Lake, KS 15. Fort Supply Lake, OK 16. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 17. Great Bend, KS 18. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 19- Halstead, KS 20. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 38-2 38-2 38-2 38-3 38-3 38-3 38-3 38-4 38-4 38-4 38-4 38-5 38-5 38-5 38-5 38-6 38-6 38-6 38-6 38-6 38-6 38-7 38-7 21. Hugo Lake, OK 22. Hulah Lake, OK 23. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 24. Kaw Lake, OK 25. Lake Kemp, TX 26. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 27. Marion Reservoir, KS 28. McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX 29. Mingo Creek, OK 30. Oologah Lake, OK 31. Optima Lake, OK 32. Parker Lake, OK 33. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 34. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 35. Pine Creek Lake, TX 36. Sardis Lake, OK 37. Skiatook Lake, OK 38. Toronto Lake, KS 39. Tulsa & West Tulsa Levees, OK 40. Waurika Lake, OK 41. Winfield, KS 42. Wister Lake, OK 43. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 44. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 45. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 46. Emergency Flood Control Activities 47. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 38-1 38-7 38-7 38-7 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-9 38-9 38-9 38-9 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-12 38-12 38-12 38-12 38-12 38-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Tables 48. Broken Bow Lake, OK 49. Eufaula Lake, OK 50. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 51. Keystone Lake, OK 52. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK & TX 53. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK 54. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 55. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK 38-12 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-14 38-14 General Investigations 56. Surveys 57. Collection and Study of Basic Data 38-14 38-14 38-A Cost and Financial Statement 38-B Authorizing Legislation 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 38-D Not Applicable 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 38-F Not Applicable 38-G Deauthorized Projects 38-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple-Purpose Plan 38-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 38-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 38-K General Investigations Navigation 1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects.The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiple- purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan- Kerr project also includes bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29- R Local cooperation Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations and results during fiscal year, Routine operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 38-C. Flood Control 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Deep Fork River, at river mile 218.3, in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geologi" cal Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level unco"' 38-2 38-15 38-24 38-27 38-27 38-28 38-28 38-29 38-30 38-30 -- TULSA, OK, DISTRICT trolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a 105-square-mile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980, and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 4. ARKANSAS CITY, KS. Location. Arkansas City is located approximately 4 miles north of the Kansas-Oklahoma state line at the crossroads of U.S. Highway's 77 and 166, in Cowley County, KS, immediately northwest of the confluence of the Arkansas and Walnut Rivers. Existing project. The project consists of raising and extending approximately 6 miles of levee along the Arkansas and Walnut Rivers, and rechanneling approximately 2-1/2 miles of the Walnut River. Structural steel gates will be constructed at two railroad/ river crossings and stoplog structures will be constructed at two U.S. Highway/river crossings. Local cooperation.A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on September 4, 1996. The city of Arkansas City, the local sponsor, are currently fulfilling their requirements. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRhase II construction is ongoing and on schedule for Completion in FY 02. 5. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX. Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project The project was initiated as a result of studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and Red Rivers are major national and regional Water resources which are severely limited due to Poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt located sources in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by 10 naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas, and southwestern Oklahoma. Preliminary Feasibility Studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 chloride emission areas. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99- 662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). 5a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS, TX. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963, and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 5b. AREA VIII, TX. Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9, of the South Fork of the Wichita River, in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a low-flow brine collection dam (the Bateman Low-Flow Dam) with attendant pumping station and pipeline facilities. The collected brine is pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, contains collected brine from Area VIII and will contain brine collected in the future from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The Bateman Low-Flow Dam was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. 38-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning Existing project. For a description of the comlocal cooperation requirements is given on page pleted improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in November 1973, and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 5c. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK. Location. The project is located in Cottle, Hall, and King Counties, TX, and Harmon County, OK, along the Wichita and Red Rivers. Area VI is located on the Elm Fork of the Red River in Harmon County, OK; Area VII is on the North Fork of the Wichita River, Cottle County, TX; Crowell Brine Dam is on Canal Creek, a tributary of the Pease River; Area IX is on the Middle Pease River, Cottle County, TX; Area X is on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River, King County, TX; and Areas XIII-XIV are on the Jonah and Salt Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River, Hall County, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of one deep-well injection system, three brine storage reservoirs, four low-flow brine collection dams, two well collection facilities, six pumping plants, and 56.3 miles of pipeline. Construction was completed at Estelline Springs, Area VIII (low-flow dam, pumpstation and pipeline), Area X (low-flow dam and pumpstation) and Truscott Lake. In 1987, Area VIII began operation, pumping brines to Truscott Lake. Local Cooperation. Section 1107 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project at full Federal expense. The Red River Authority of Texas has signed a 221 Agreement as the non-Federal sponsor. Operation and results during fiscal yeaEstimated total cost of the project is $241,500,000 (October 1997 price level base). A draft Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Study (SFEIS) was submitted for public review in May 1995. Finalization of the SFEIS has been put on hold indefinitely and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works directed that a reevaluation of the Wichita River Basin be performed with available funding. 6. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall, in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 7. BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE, TX. Location. Bowie County is located in northeastern Texas, along the Red River, near Texarkana, Texas. The Bowie County Levee is situated on the south side of the Red River and extends almost 9 miles from the Kansas City Southern Railroad embankment westward to an area near Wamba, Texas. (See Wamba, TX, Gelogical Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project, as authorized under the Flood Control Act of 1946, provides for the rehabilitation of the existing Bowie County, Texas, Levee. The levee was constructed in 1913 by the Bowie County Levee District No. 1. The Bowie County Levee is part of a levee system which includes the Miller County Levee that extends downstream approximately 35 miles. The existing Bowie County Levee does not meet current design standards and has not received proper maintenance. Studies completed in 1994 indicated that no economically feasible flood control alternative was identified and Federal interest in pursuing detailed design and project construction was not warranted. Legislation passed in FY 01 re-authorized the project to include rehabilitation of approximately 6 miles of the existing levee and construction of approximately 4 miles of new levee. This project will be constructed at an estimated cost of $10,000,000. Local cooperation. Additional legislation is required to allow the Government to build the levee proposed by the local sponsor. The Government has determined that this project will be cost-shared in accordance with the Flood Control Act of 1936. The Corps of Engineers has determined that cost sharing on this project will be in accordance with the Flood Control Act of 1936. Operations and results during fiscal yes he sponsor is pursuing appropriate legislation which will allow the project to proceed. 8. CANDYLAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 38-4 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above the streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10x11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18x24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation.Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, apply. Operations and results during fiscal yea.n accordance with PL 99-662, 33 U.S.C. 579a 1001 (b)(2), the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works submitted a list of projects for deauthorization to Congress on January 8, 1993. Certain projects from this list, including Candy, were deauthorized on July 9, 1995. WRDA 99 mandated selling project lands back to the former owners or their heirs. 9. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940, and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation.The Canton Lake Committee Was established to improve coordination and communication between the multi-purpose users of Canton Lake. The committee coordinates Oklahoma City's Water supply release schedule with interested parties to minimize impacts.. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 10. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River, in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972, and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 11. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove, in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959, and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 12. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. Local cooperation. By payment of $8.17 million on May 18, 1997, the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has fully complied with the Local Cooperation Agreement. 38-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and results during fiscal yeaou. WRDA 99 mandated the transfer without consider- tine operation and maintenance continued. ation of 51.98 acres of land to the state of Kansas for use as Honor Camps. The state of Kansas must pay 16. FRY CREEKS, BIXBY, OK. for the administrative costs of the land transfer. 'M 1. . , .1 . I'.. I tRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 13. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence, in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962, and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 14. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River, in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaoutine operation and maintenance continued. 15. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward, in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Location. In the northern part of the city of Bixby, in Tulsa County, OK. Existing project. The project consists of enlarging both Fry Creeks, diverting Fry Creek 1 into Fry Creek 2 and then diverting the combined creeks into the Arkansas River. The total length of the modified channels would total 4.3 miles, with bottom widths of 30 to 225 feet and depths of 6 to 12 feet. Three bridges will be constructed and 20 acres of land has been acquired for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed with the city of Bixby, OK, in January 1995. Operations and results during fiscal yeaEstimated total cost of the project is $13,540,000. In September 1996, construction efforts were initiated on this project and were completed in FY 00. 17. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas River; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas River left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Financial closeout on this project was completed dur ing FY 97. This project has been fully operational since June 1994. Estimated total cost of the project is $36,350,000 (October 1994 price level base). 18. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Chero0 38-6 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT kee, in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938, and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HALSTEAD, KS. Location.In the city of Halstead, in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 50-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaffhe project is fully operational, however, the Corps is evaluating a construction contract claim on this project. This effort is expected to continue through the end of FY 01. 20. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa, in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the com- Pted improvement, see page 599 of the Annual port for 1969. Construction started in March 1948, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake Were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. The channel improvement Project below the lake was never maintained by the sPonsor, Joint Drainage District No. 1, Tulsa and Creek Counties, OK. For this reason, the channel returned to its pre-project condition and does not provide flood protection for the affected area. The Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance inspections of the channel project in 1982, due to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation on the part of the sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal yeatioutine operation and maintenance continued. 21. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo, in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967, and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. WRDA 99 mandated the sale, at fair market value, of approximately 250 acres of project lands at Hugo Lake to the Choctaw County Industrial Authority. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington, in Coffey County, KS. (See 38-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959, and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 24. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City, in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966, and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 25. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 26. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Financial closeout is ongoing and scheduled to be complete during FY 01. Existing project.The existing Lake Wichita dam was replaced with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long with a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. Channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles, were also constructed. Local cooperation.Fully compiled with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaEhe project was completed October 1, 1996, and is fully operational. Estimated total project cost is $48,789,000 (October 1995 price level base). Financial closeout is ongoing and scheduled to be complete during FY 01. 27. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion, in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964, and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeAr. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. MCGRATH CREEK, WICHITA FALLS, TX. Location. The project is located in the northern central portion of Texas, in the city of Wichita Falls. Existing projecthMcGrath Creek is approximately 3,900 feet long and connects Sikes Lake and the recently constructed Holliday Creek project. The project involves realigning and concrete lining the McGrath Creek Channel, and constructing a neW spillway to pass flows through Sikes Lake. Local cooperation.The city of Wichita Falls, TX is the non-Federal sponsor. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in November 1994 38-8 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year.and was completed in May 1963 for initial develop- Project construction is completed. Estimated total ment. Construction for ultimate (second stage) project cost is $13,520,000 (October 1996 price development was initiated in July 1967, and was level base). Financial closeout occurred this FY. completed in 1974. 29. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in the city of Tulsa, in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites, which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There will be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation prior to initiation of Federal construction in September 1988. The project is currently 99% complete. Operations and results during fiscal yeaReimbursement to date for work completed by the City of Tulsa is $19,000,000. Estimated total project cost is $119,200,000 (October 1998 price level base). Project completion is expected in FY 01. 80. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah, in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Xi ting project. For a description of the comted improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955, Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaffhe first year of a three year water quality study was completed in FY 00 with O&M funds of $485,000. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty, in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project.For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966, and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRPutine operation and maintenance continued. 32. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada, in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake, if constructed, would be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project would consist of an earthfill dam about 2,200 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project has not been funded for construction, however, a Limited Project Review of the project is scheduled to be completed in March 1998. Federal accomplishment of single purpose municipal and industrial water supply projects is not in accord with current Administration priorities. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost 38-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 share in the flood control portion of the project and the water supply provided enough interested users for the water supply can be identified. Operation and results during fiscal yeaEstimated total project cost is $71,400,000 (October 1992 price level base). 33. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris, in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeakoutine operation and maintenance continued. 34. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974, and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 35. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City, in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963, and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 36. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton, in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake is operated as a unit of a two-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The other lake in the system is Hugo Lake). Construction began in August 1975, and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) failed to make satisfactory arrangements to pay for the Sardis Lake water supply storage as agreed to in a letter exchange of September 1997. On July 2, 1998, the state of Oklahoma was declared in default under the contract. On July 14, 1998, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed suit in the Northern District Court of Oklahoma. The litigation has not moved forward because of a taxpayer "qui tam" suit filed in January 1998 in the Western District Court of Oklahoma against the OWRB and the United States. The suit between OWRB and the United States was postponed until a decision was reached on the taxpayer "qui tam" suit. On March 4, 1999, the Western District Court dismissed OWRB and the United States from the suit. The taxpayer group has 30 days to appeal. The DOJ will continue legal proceedings when the appeal process has lapsed in the "qui tam" suit. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 37. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook, in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project For a description of the completed improvement, see Page19-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. 38-10 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yearA dam safety project to rehabilitate the existing spillway was authorized with the approval of the Dam Safety Report in FY 97. Construction is scheduled to begin in FY 01. The total project cost is estimated to be $9,700,000 (October 1999 price levels). A waterborne shower/toilet is under construction in Twin Points Recreation Area. A wastewater treatment system for the facility was completed. Rural water will be installed for the area in FY 01. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 88. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto, in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project.For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954, and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. have deteriorated and levee material has eroded into the pipes leaving small cavities in the embankment. The Tulsa District completed an evaluation of the levees in September 1989, which determined that rehabilitation would be required for the levees to operate as designed. Funds to repair the levee were provided in FY 91 and FY 94 by the U.S. Congress. Local cooperation.The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in March 1992, with Tulsa County and Levee District No. 12, the non-Federal sponsors. Approximately three-quarters of the project repairs have been completed to date. In FY 99, a supplement to the LCA and additional funding was provided by the local sponsor to allow construction of Phase II. Additional funding is required to complete all necessary repairs. Operations and results during fiscal yeaPhase I contract for repair of 23 of the 48 deficient pipes was awarded July 30, 1992, and completed in July 1993. Phase II construction was initiated in the summer of 1999 and was completed in FY 00. 40. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Operations and results during fiscal yearWaurika, in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, WRDA 99 mandated the transfer without consider- OK-TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) ation of 31.98 acres of project lands to the state of ansas, however, Kansas must pay for the administrative costs of the transfer. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 89. TULSA AND WEST TULSA LEVEES, OK. Location On the banks of the Arkansas River near Tulsa, OK. On the left bank, the levee extends from river mile 531.0 near Sand Springs, OK, downstream to river mile 521.4 at Tulsa. On the right bank, the levee extends from near river mile 526.7 downstream toriver mile 521.3 and is adjacent to the major portion Ofthe business and residential districts in West Tulsa, Tulsa County, OK. Existing project.The Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees Were completed by the Tulsa District in 1945. The project was turned over to the Tulsa County Drainage District No. 12 for operations and maintenance. The Project consists of 3 levees with a total length of about 20 miles and an average height of 10 feet. The levees provide protection from flooding to props" ty valued at approximately $1 billion dollars. Many of the drainage pipes that pass under the levee Existing project For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971, and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operations and maintenance continued. 41. WINFIELD, KS. Location. Winfield is located approximately 15 miles north of the Kansas-Oklahoma state line on U.S. Highway 77 in Cowley County, KS. The city is located immediately southeast of the confluence of the Walnut River and Timber Creek. Existing project. The project consists of raising and extending approximately 4 miles of levee along Timber Creek and the Walnut River. Road ramps will be constructed at two locations where city streets cross the Walnut River. 38-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation.A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on September 4, 1996. The city of Winfield, the local sponsor, is currently fulfilling its requirements. Operations and results during fiscal yearA construction contract was awarded in FY 98. Construction was completed in FY 99. Financial closeout occurred this FY. 42. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister, in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946, and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclama. tion lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one city-county owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Routine flood control releases were required at several of the projects. Fiscal year costs for scheduling flood control reservoir operations totaled $727,607. 46. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for catastrophic disaster preparedness was $32,350; advance preparation was $177,671. 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. C!_ ,,FY 99 dit sP-f-oVrO S mall :ee l alte 380-i JLr r L Aexpenu ULrOv. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Operations and results during fiscal year.Shoreline Projects (Section 14). WRDA 99 mandated the transfer of 10-acres of project lands to the Summerfield Cemetary Association for use as a cemetery. Routine operation Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power and maintenance continued. 43. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 38-E. 44. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table 38-I for a list of projects inspected in FY 00. Fiscal year cost was $156,111. 45. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. 48. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow, in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. The development of a trout fishery in the Mountain Fork River below Broken Bow Lake was implemented in 1989, in cooperation with the Corps of Engineers (Corps), Southwestern power Administration, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. The operation of the trout stream has been cooperatively managed by a Memorandum of Understanding. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA 96), Sec. 338, modified the project to provide for the reallocation of sufficient quantity of water supply storage space to support 38-12 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT the Mountain Fork trout fishery at no expense to the State of Oklahoma. The District is waiting on implementing guidance. Operations and results during fiscal yeaiRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 49. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula, in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. There are numerous areas along the shoreline where private property is subject to flooding and erosion as a result of the construction and operation. Erosion problems in numerous subdivisions bordering the lake were studied in 1989 and 1993. At this time, it is estimated that there are approximately 22 miles of shoreline in need of attention. Estimated costs for repair is approximately $15 million. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaA contract has been awarded to rehabilitate the floating tainter gate bulkhead. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 50. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson, in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942, but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946, and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. . KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957, and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 52. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939, and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. WRDA 99 mandated the sale, at fair market value, of approximately 1,580 acres of project lands to the state of Oklahoma's Department of Tourism. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 53. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw, in LeFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964, and closure was completed in 38-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. 54. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore, in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947, and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation.Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal yeaRoutine operation and maintenance continued. A project to build an auxiliary spillway and to modify the existing spillway was authorized February 22, 1994, by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, under the Dam Safety Assurance Program. Phase I was awarded in FY 00. Phase II will be awarded in FY 02. 55. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls, in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilitiesFacilities at the Port of Muskogee include: a cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hydropower unit repairs were completed and all units are operational. Routine operation and maintenance continued. General Investigations 56. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $640,071, which included two reconnaissance studies; three special studies; miscellaneous activities-special investigations, intragency water resources development; coordination with other Federal agencies, States, and non-Federal interests, and seven Planning Assistance to States Studies. Table 38-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 57. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $391,768, which includes floodplain management services. Table 38-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 38-14 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas New Work River Navigation System, Approp OK, (Tulsa District Portion) Cost - 130,936,6382 - 130,936,6382 3,919,000 3,771,000 3,871,300 4,080,296 3,054,371 4,638,166 3,761,500 173,354,762 3,727,639 173,517,546 3. Arcadia Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 4. Arkansas City, KS (Contributed Funds) 5. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, KS, OK, and TX Sa. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 5b. Area VIII, TX 1,270 4,508 459,700 354,000 331,000 351,059 479,049 342,408 444,500 442,653 -95,000 1,878,000 276,000 1,226,279 274,651 1,903,566 295,583 1,354,661 265,000 900 900 1,200 1,275 New Work Approp Cost 223,000 12,437 2,400 2,320 1,200 1,100 -10,250 Maint Approp Cost Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK New Work Approp Cost 1,556,100 1,198,000 1,071,300 1,518,053 1,297,175 1,080,350 2,137,000 4,063,142 720,000 1,849,000 1,547,581 1,405,550 1,311,000 13,334,348 1,304,043 13,321,369 1,350,000 30,718,800 1,561,098 29,818,599 38-15 Maint Approp Cost 82,965,900 82,958,217 4,692,082 3,880,165 6,310,279 6,281,818 488,000 12,437 25,705,208 25,705,208 2,316,354 2,316,354 300,028 300,028 158,657 158,476 46,682,242 46,671,992 Sc. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 6. Birch Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 13,549,170 13,549,170 553,200 496,000 498,400 541,678 498,447 526,092 495,500 13,551,766 494,938 13,551,204 7. Bowie County Levee, TX 8. Candy Lake, OK 9. Canton Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 11,209,834 11,209,834 1,737,000 1,456,500 1,560,400 1,682,862 1,562,995 1,601,356 1,938,000 35,414,268 1,933,114 35,402,774 10. Copan Lake, OK 83,800,814 -1,625 83,799,189 678,900 733,500 611,800 640,770 760,094 629,790 713,700 12,401,479 718,401 12,400,540 11. Council Grove Lake, KS 1,134,800 1,070,000 1,391,950 1,112,760 1,067,444 1,453,622 1,939,500 21,902,760 1,941,271 21,900,286 12. El Dorado Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 29,369 26 430,500 337,470 317,400 419,541 347,380 330,713 38-16 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 100,000 487,934 15,100 8,116 45,000 79,025 3,500 10,244 Maint Approp Cost 10,898 4,300 4,478 12,245 4,300 4,258 1,820,000 1,805,837 4,927,922 4,927,922 221,870 221,755 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost -30,293 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 11,810,5 0 9 11,810,509 92,413,349 92,413,343 7,392,050 7,390,043 413,000 410,488 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 13. Elk City Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost 19,052,990 19,052,990 622,800 425,000 519,500 597,575 434,131 538,892 542,500 16,065,250 540,154 16,055,785 14. Fall River Lake, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Fort Supply Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 10,550,873 10,550,873 845,500 891,000 1,161,500 1,255,300 19,330,242 850,016 897,288 1,179,778 1,249,267 19,317,546 -6120 6120 7,723,134 7,723, 134 734,300 922,000 764,700 1,043,900 19,532,698 771,363 798,618 931,152 1,039,928 19,527,068 16. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK New Work Approp Cost 2,837,000 2,413,000 1,845,000 2,385,420 2,917,165 1,849,834 331,000 10,195,568 299,002 10,035,248 (Contrib. Funds) 17. Great Bend, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) Contrib. 275,000 365,000 Cost 140,854 141,209 New Work Approp Cost -373,000 -335,263 357,937 50 Contrib. 178,254 Cost 371,147 18. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 298,000 302,592 146,500 145,500 154,372 148,745 19. Halstead, KS (Federal) New Work Approp Cost 200,000 -100,000 113,882 7,214 -37,000 13,203 137,000 8,483,000 106,110 8,428,336 38-17 Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 640,000 640,000 19,968,400 19,968,073 4,259,254 4,259,254 4,626,270 4,626,270 8,214,347 8,212,876 153,000 152,074 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 Halstead, KS (Cont'd) (Contributed Funds) 20. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 940,000 924,537 2,560,572 2,560,572 730,300 568,000 598,050 643,679 649,285 621,158 599,000 14,276,536 597,959 14,270,067 21. Hugo Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 22. Hulah Lake, OK -80 41,211,562 41,211,562 1,444,600 1,359,618 1,543,500 1,557,300 32,404,480 1,452,729 1,338,389 1,604,919 1,572,140 32,397,562 New Work Approp Cost 11,388,150 11,388,150 Maint Approp Cost 351,700 682,000 527,170 350,942 366,808 862,271 379,800 12,336,582 378,336 12,335,118 Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 23. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 135,718 135,718 28,151,470 28,151,470 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp 2,513,000 654,000 3,031,700 2,250,800 33,331,967 Cost 2,328,060 1,000,729 3,063,025 2,173,461 33,254,609 23. Kaw Lake, OK (Federal) New Work Approp Cost 109,430,750 S 109,430,750 Maint Approp 1,778,100 1,705,000 1,643,420 1,973,000 37,797,195 Cost 1,812,806 1,730,601 1,635,264 2,004,185 37,782,468 (Contributed Funds) Contrib. Cost 38-18 43,934 43,934 Maint Approp Cost TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 25. Lake Kemp, TX New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 140,100 140,000 196,400 161,347 139,004 201,101 26. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (Federal) (Contributed Funds) 27. Marion Reservoir, KS New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 227,260 16,510 60,061 58,212 33,902,212 1,300 33,845,300 - 7,835,000 - 7,835,000 13,420,818 13,420,818 Maint Approp Cost 2,372,000 1,953,000 1,456,800 2,438,030 1,903,431 1,563,173 1,622,000 26,061,355 1,608,056 26,047,321 Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 68,924 68,924 28. McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (Federal) (Contributed Funds) 29. Mingo Creek, OK (Federal) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost 3,393,000 3,391,000 3,945,215 3,548,168 Contrib. 2,315,000 451,100 Cost 2,376,586 576,922 New Work Approp Cost 4,785,000 9,036,726 4,034,000 4,534,340 9,271,284 2,068,230 Contrib. 1,785,000 2,490,000 Cost 3,184,924 1,734,535 745,211 93,000 40,422 -13,491 146,578 - -116,740 18 -116,666 8,538,349 8,538,349 3,086,860 3,086,860 2,790,000 76,904,726 3,957,236 75,916,986 - 16,253,400 255,192 15,871,317 Qologah Lake, OK 1,485,000 1,545,600 1,519,158 1,556,000 2,500,600 33,050,560 2,354,285 32,904,154 38-19 7,637,702 7,637,702 3,563,401 3,563,381 132,900 134,012 30. New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1,543,000 1,596,187 37,029,9283 37,029,9283 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 80, 2000 31. Optima Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 32. Parker Lake, OK 33. Pat Mayse Lake, TX New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 91,000 97,887 75,000 15,326 50,000 23,544 52,567 25,930 55,334 4,313 Maint Approp Cost 34. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 878,000 841,000 1,049,060 1,419,000 20,011,266 857,128 871,487 1,070,088 1,414,598 20,036,855 New Work Approp Cost 16,879,166 16,879,166 Maint Approp Cost 35. Pine Creek Lake, OK 929,800 869,000 749,300 1,629,000 15,970,528 911,511 856,954 779,690 1,621,799 15,955,475 New Work Approp Cost 20,628,049 20,628,049 1,074,900 857,000 986,350 1,204,000 21,630,137 1,024,551 913,376 1,002,949 1,202,771 21,628,316 36. Sardis Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost - -281,041 - -105,740 1,000,100 800,000 759,400 1,023,550 856,598 786,443 857,000 14,089,621 850,120 14,081,974 37. Skiatook Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost -1,244 465,000 - 269,564 1,230,900 947,000 818,500 1,319,000 16,384,438 1,270,191 1,056,800 841,665 1,316,760 16,379,285 38-20 56,500 56,483 47,173,438 47,173,438 7,514,693 7,514,638 585,326 584,973 9,310,661 9,310,661 Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 68,518,439 68,518,429 Maint Approp Cost 318,000 363,350 107,051,738 106,901,652 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 38. Toronto Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost 13,896,324 13,896,324 39. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK (Federal) (Contributed Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost 347,700 398,000 519,716 344,096 402,765 526,993 17,749 679 10,644 75,000 31,937 2,856 75,000 49,191 350,000 8,940,832 359,068 8,938,953 457,787 17,976 230,433 Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 40. Waurika Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost -69 1,425,000 1,417,886 492,976 412,240 1,118,111 1,110,444 69,729,461 69,729,281 1,364,500 1,152,000 1,355,000 1,392,000 23,287,862 1,327,246 1,201,941 1,377,034 1,368,572 23,264,080 41. Winfield, KS (Contributed Funds) 42. Wister Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost -86,000 2,378,000 3,375,000 248,869 2,330,421 2,802,721 - 65,000 Maint Approp Cost 1,011,400 501,500 489,500 919,324 604,693 530, 175 522,000 15,605,524 512,889 15,596,027 Major Rehabilitation Approp Cost Broken Bow Lake, OK 11,131,529 11,131,529 41,222,692 41,222,692 New Work Approp Cost 38-21 Maint Approp Cost 532,000 1,003,158 -10,540 54,460 8,186,617 7,971,712 54,460 54,460 10,690,751 10,687,439 48. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 Broken Bow Lake, OK (Cont'd) 49. Eufaula Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost 1,318,000 1,321,669 1,091,900 1,472,000 33,892,866 1,251,537 1,294,720 1,215,477 1,471,041 33,887,621 New Work Approp Cost 123,795,907' 123,795,9074 Maint Approp 3,884,800 4,697,000 4,028,000 5,983,500 88,507,083 Cost 4,006,071 4,480,746 4,367,219 5,982,694 88,477,453 (Contributed Funds) 50. Fort Gibson Lake, OK (Contributed Funds) 51. Keystone Lake, OK Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 254,780 254,180 43,821,405' 43,821,4056 3,436,000 3,273,000 3,464,000 4,112,800 73,249,412 3,486,300 3,203,442 3,647,826 4,084,774 73,180,679 - 501,000 487,164 123,171,1736 123,171,1736 3,588,800 3,295,000 3,899,600 4,822,000 70,031,005 3,660,176 3,304,610 3,945,300 4,814,771 69,997,510 52. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX New Work Approp Cost 68,168,9607 - 68,157,3907 Maint Approp 5,680,000 5,480,000 5,370,740 7,716,000 Cost 6,241,324 5,666,505 5,437,475 7,740,970 Minor Rehabilitation Approp - - Cost . 53. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK New Work Approp Cost 38-22 Maint Approp Cost 127,053,408 126,998,923 46,237 46,237 94,578,237 94,578,237 -11,570 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (Cont'd) 54. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 55. Webbers Falls Lock & Dam, OK 4,176,000 4,416,000 3,609,200 4,561,323 4,445,457 3,695,194 4,022,000 76,113,045 4,019,578 76,084,834 411,000 195,000 1,684,000 4,889,000 32,552,720" 595,704 239,836 809,938 5,439,572 32,213,0508 3,078,700 2,748,000 2,903,100 4,258,000 66,063,820 3,076,723 2,848,279 2,947,711 4,209,693 66,015,423 New Work Approp Cost 86,107,967 86,107,967 Maint Approp Cost 3,484,900 3,590,400 4,376,000 4,803,000 71,344,824 3,192,062 3,695,492 4,972,118 4,779,826 71,277,987 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8 dated, March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Tables 29-M of the FY 85 Annual Report. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds; and $1,058,500 Hydropower. 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 7. Includes $433,549 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. 9. The cost for Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees has been added to the amount reported in paragraph 45, Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations. 38-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 August 26, 1994 October 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 November 17, 1986 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropwer ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply ARKANSAS CITY ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. BIRCH LAKE BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE FRY CREEKS GREAT BEND 38-24 4. 5. 5a. 5b.&5c. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. HD 79-758 PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HD 91-299 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 SD 87-107 PL 89-789 SD 110 PL 91-611 PL 99-662 HD 87-563 PL 103-316 HD 87-564 HD 75-569 HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 PL 99-662 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 March 14, 1990 November 17, 1988 November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 October 23, 1962 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 38-25 HULAH LAKE HD 74-308 JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR HD 80-442 Authorized name change PL 85-327 KAW LAKE HD 87-143 LAKE KEMP HD 87-144 LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK PL 99-662 MARION RESERVOIR HD 80-442 Authorized name change PL 101-253 MCGRATH CREEK WICHITA FALLS, TX PL 100-676 MINGO CREEK PL 99-662 OOLOGAH LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session OPTIMA LAKE HD 74-308 PARKER LAKE PL 99-662 PAT MAYSE LAKE HD 88-71 PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE HD 87-472 Authorized name change PL 95-265 PINE CREEK LAKE HD 85-170 SARDIS LAKE SD 87-145 Authorized name change PL 97-88 SKIATOOK LAKE HD 87-563 TORONTO LAKE HD 76-440 PL 77-228 TULSA & WEST TULSA, OK PL 77-228 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 40. 41. 42. June 28, 1938 June 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 WAURIKA LAKE WINFIELD WISTER LAKE Changed conservation pool elevation Increase permanent pool level BROKEN BOW LAKE Reallocation of water supply storage EUFAULA LAKE Authorized Piney Creek and Muddy Creek bridge replacement Authorized cost sharing December 30, 1963 October 27, 1965 June 28, 1938 July 30, 1983 October 12, 1996 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 12, 1996 July 24, 1946 July 16,1984 November 17, 1986 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 June 28, 1938 October 17, 1940 Sepember 30, 1944 August 14, 1953 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 8, 1963 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Power WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM SD 88-33 PL 88-253 PL 89-298 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., ist Session PL 98-63 PL 104-303 HD 85-170 SD 87-137 PL 104-303 HD 79-758 PL 98-360 PL99-662 HD 76-107 PL 76-228 PL 99-662 SD 81-07 HD 75-541 PL 76-868 PL 78-454 PL 83-273 PL 99-662 HD 79-758 PL 88-62 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. HD 79-758 HD 79-758 38-26 FORT GIBSON LAKE Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin Added hydropower units 5 & 6 KEYSTONE LAKE LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) Flood control and power Navigation and regulating flows Authorized name Water supply Recreation ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. -e TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 2000 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintnenace Big and Little Sallisaw Inactive - - 3,163 Navigation Project Poteau River Navigation Project, Complete 1983 536,952 OK and AR Red River from Fulton, AR, Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 to Mouth of Washita River TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30. 2000 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KS' 2 1938 84,217 Boswell Lake, OK3 1952 - - Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK2 1970 261,448 Crutcho Creek LPP, OK3 1972 213,016 Dodge City LPP, KS2 Enid LPP, OK2 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK2 , 4 1975 1,741,000 - Florence LPP, KS2 1965 369,782 - Hutchinson LPP, KS2 1956 3,497,718 - Iola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290 - Jenks LPP, OK 2 1950 344,797 Joe Creek LPP, OK2 308,041 Larned LPP, KS2 Lukfata Lake, OK3 1983 1,424,685 Marion, KS 1988 5,488,618 Oklahoma City LPP, OK 2 1960 8,047,512 Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, OK and TX2 1953 222,105 Red River Emergency Bank Protection - 400,000 Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996 Sand Lake, OK3 1963 Shidler Lake, OK3 1983 568,191 - Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK 2 1954 3,592,432 - Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK3 1975 144,853 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200 - Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379 - LPP. Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. . Active with no current year expenditures. 38-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Big Pine Lake, TX 1984 November 1, 1997 1,701,670 0 Public Law 99-662 Candy Lake, OK 1996 July 9, 1995 4,950,000 0 Public Law 99-662 Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17,1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99-662 Lake Texoma Perimeter Access July, 9, 1995 13,200 0 Roads, Texas & Oklahoma Public Law 99-662 Sand Lake, OK April 5, 1999 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Shidler Lake, OK May 1, 1997 568,000 0 Public Law 99-662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 393,361 0 Public Law 99-662 Tuskahoma Lake, OK 1963 July 19, 1992 Public Law 99-662 TABLE 38-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PUPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) River Mild Nearest Town LAKES Canton Elk City Eufaula Fall River Fort Gibson Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees Keystone Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Neodesha Oologah Tenkiller Ferry Toronto Wister North Canadian Elk River Canadian Fall River Grand (Neosho) Grand (Neosho) Arkansas Grand (Neosho) Verdigris Verdigris Illinois Verdigris Poteau 394.3 8.7 27.0 54.2 7.7 77.0 538.8 47.4 222.8 90.2 12.8 271.5 60.9 Canton, OK Elk City, KS Eufaula, OK Fall River, KS Fort Gibson, OK Disney, OK Sand Springs, OK Locust Grove, OK Neodesha, KS Oologah, OK Gore, OK Toronto, KS Wister, OK 38-28 Feature River TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PUPOSE PLAN Continued (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mild Nearest Town McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Verdigris and N/A2 Fort Smith, AR, Channel Rectification Arkansas to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. TABLE 38-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 44 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date 01i- Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK Deep Fork Channel Clearing Dodge City, KS Enid Diviersion Channel, OK Flat Rock/Valley View Creeks, OK Florence, KS Great Bend, KS Haikey Creek, OK lialstead, KS Hutchinson, KS Iola, KS Holliday Creek, Wichita Falls, TX Jenks, OK Joe Creek, OK Larned, KS Marion, KS Mingo Creek, OK North Canadian Waste Water Treatment Plant, OK Oklahoma City Floodway, OK Park City, KS South Deer Creek, OK Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees, OK West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS Wichita/Valley Center, KS November 1999 September 1999 October 1999 October 1999 November 1999 December 1999 October 1999 November 1999 November 2000 April 2000 January 2000 August 2000 October 2000 October 2000 November 1999 February 2000 October 2000 August 2000 August 2000 May 2000 September 1999 October 2000 May 2000 May 2000 38-29 - --- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 47 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS - Section 205 Coordination Section 205 Coordination Bixby Creek, Bixby, OK Lake Carl Blackwell, Stillwater, OK Cowskin Creek, Wichita, KS Sycamore Creek, Coffeyville, KS Whitewater River, Augusta, KS Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Section 14 Coordination Mainstreet Bridge, Halstead, KS Neosho River Bridge, Neosho County, KS Water Supply Dam, Neosho River, Oswego Slover Street, Shawnee, OK TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECT MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT Section 1135 Coordination Initial General Appraisals Arcadia, OK, Fish Habitat Restoration Eastern Avenue Bottomland Hardwoods Restoration, OK El Dorado, KS, Fish Habitat Restoration Riverine Habitat Restoration, OK Sally Jones Lake, Vian, OK TOTALMODIFI CATION TO IMMPROVE ENVIRONMENT AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206) Section 206 Coordination Preliminary Restoration Plans Byron Walker Wetlands, Kingman, KS Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, North Canadian River, OK TOTAL AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (Section 1135) 18,792 162,816 20,284 13,591 13,995 22,535 483,822 64.699 800,534 7,346 238,607 5,223 483 5,881 257,540 18,925 15,853 -8 103,002 -11,932 113,451 6,849 246,140 17,734 39,131 2,840 144.749 204,454 38-30 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 56 and 57 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Reconnaissance Study Bois D'Arc Creek, Bonham, TX Warr Acres, Bethany, OK Special Studies Watershed/Ecosystem Reconnaissance Study Cimarron River Basin, OK & KS Southeast Oklahoma, OK Walnut & Whitewater Rivers Watershed, KS Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations Intragency Water Resources Development Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (PL 83-566) Coop with Other Water Resource Development Agencies Planning Assistance to States Planning Assistance to States, Negotiation Oklahoma, McClellan Kerr Arkansas River Oklahoma, Grand Lake Sewer Study Oklahoma, Lake Texoma Regional Sewer Oklahoma, Mangum Lake Oklahma, Poteau River Phase Oklahoma, Tenkiller Water Treatment Oklahoma, Arkansas River Channel Capacity TOTAL SURVEYS COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Guides, Pamphlets and Supporting Studies Indian Workshops NFPC Project Impact Quick Responses SS-Avant, OK SS-Blanchard, OK SS-Cache Creek SS-Camp Robinson SS-Del City, OK SS-Florence, KS SS-Haysville, KS SS-Midwest City, OK SS-Ponca Tribe, OK SS-Riverine Flood Model 8S-Skiatook, OK SS-Waurika, OK SS-Webbers Falls, OK SS-Wichita, KS SS-Whetstone NJ Tribal FloodCinrgeek 'Technical Services General TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 38-31 74,695 78,372 90,756 73,699 70,913 30,903 12,557 11,965 6,001 27,564 1,476 26,031 -8,427 106,197 10, 660 26,709 640,071 124,121 15 5 18,492 1,240 9,868 1,806 36,414 2 15 106 40,539 13 6 14,939 2,527 48 28 31 576 9 15 140,953 391,768 - FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT* FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 39-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation .............................3. ............. 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT. TX .................. 3 Flood Control .................................. 3 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX ...............3.................. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX.........................4.... 4. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX ......4...... 5. BELTON LAKE, TX ...............4................. 6. BENBROOK LAKE, TX ................ 5 7. CANYON LAKE, TX .................. 5 8. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM LAKE ...........6 O'THE PINES. TX .........................6 10. HORDS CREEK LAKE,IX......... .........6........... 11. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX ...........7.......7 12. JOE POOL LAKE. TX ..............7................. 13. LAVON LAKE,T X ................8................. 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION ......8........ AND EAST FORK CHANNEL ... .......8......... IMPROVEMENT. TX ..............8.................. 15. LE WISVILLE DAM,T X .............9................. 16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE,T X ........9......... 17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND ............9................. A K E.T X ..............................9................ .. 18. PROCTOR LAKE. TX ...................... 10 19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE,T X ..........1.0........ 20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL .........1.1............ IM PROVEMENT. TX .... ........I.1. ............. 21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER. TX ..................... 11 22. SOMERVILLE LAKE,'TX ...........12............ 23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW ...........1.2.......... DAM . TX ................................ ..1.2.... 24. WACO LAKE,T X ................1.3................. 25. WACO LAKE. 'TX(D AM SAFETY)........ 13 26. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND.............. 13 LAKE. TX ......................1 3 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ......1.4...... FL.OOD CONTROL PROJECTS ......14..... 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL......... l, RESERVOIR OPERATIONS ............... 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD .............. 12 CONTROL PROJECTS ......................... 30. WORK UNDER SPECIAL......................... 1 AUTHORIZATION .............................. 1 Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power.. 31. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS ............. HYDROPOW ER, TX............................. P 32. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND.................1! RESERVOIR, TX .................................. 33. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND.................... 1 RESERVOIR, TX (DAM SAFETY).....1 34. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B.A ........................ It STEINITAGEN LAK E,TX................... It 35. W HITNEY LAKE. TX.............................. 1 General Investigations .............................. 1 36. SURVEYS ........... ............. ........... I 37. PRECONSTRUCTION .............. 1 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN...........U1 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF ............ 1 BASIC DATA ................ .... ...... Tables Table 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEM ENT....................... ....15 Table 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION ...... 19 Table 30-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.......23 Table 30-D INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS......24 Table 30-E WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION...............25 39-2 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276,89th Cong., Ist Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. Operations during fiscal year. Channel to Liberty and Tennessee Colony Lake have been dormant for several years due to lack of local support. The Dallas Floodway Extension has advanced to the Preconstruction Engineering and Design stage and is described in Preconstruction Engineering and Design section. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Charnel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel, turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. See Galveston, Texas District Annual Report write-up for existing project. Proposed project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvelnents, other thaln highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acrefeet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood 39-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $175,239 toward principal and $189,923 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. operation and maintenance continued. Routine Benefits accrued to Aquilla Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $19,775,800. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX. Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek 5- river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $1,738,986 toward principal and $2,353,082 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $13,220,600. 4. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX Location. Beals Creek, Big Spring, Texas is located in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas, on Beals Creek, a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. The Beals Creek Flood Control Project consists of construction of a channel to the north of and within a portion of the existing Beals Creek channel. The channel extends approximately 7,200 feet from a point south of Channing Street at Onemile Lake and ends at the Benton Street Bridge. The channel is a trapezoidal grass-lined channel with an average depth of 11 feet, a bottom width of 20 feet, and side slopes of 1 vertical to 3 horizontal. A grade control structure was constructed at the upper limit of the project at Onemile Lake to allow the proper drainage gradient while preserving the existing wetland environment in the Onemile Lake area. Final Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1997, base price) is $8,240,254; non-Federal cost for real estate, relocation of utilities and disposal is $3,618,152. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement with the city of Big Spring was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) on March 10, 1994. Operations during the fiscal year. The project was physically completed in December 1998. Financial closeout is in progress. 5. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply po01: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $5,125,003. To date $2,050,922 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost Of operation and maintenance. To date $3,428,541 has been paid. An interim contract with BrazoS Rive Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Arnmy o 39-4 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT January 2,1957. Amount of $433,083 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Belton Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $141,045,700. 6. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook Lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date, $2,346,916 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $195,504 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost-sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $27,315 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine OPeration and maintenance continued. Additional Work included paint and repair of both floodgates and the single emergence gate. Total cost to complete was $223,200. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 are estimnated at $3,470,587,500. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: "The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 6,070- kilowatt plant, which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. GBRA has an agreement with the Pedernales Electric Cooperative for sale of power. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1989 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date, $3,348,004 has been paid. In addition $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date, $2,725,892 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Additional work included upgrade of recreational facilities in Potters Creek Park. Total cost to complete upgrade was $125,000. Benefits accrued to Canyon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $177,939,800. 39-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 8. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM - LAKE O'THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from dam site to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700, including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. operation and maintenance continued. Routine Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O'The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $13,866,000. 9. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report of 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and completed Fiscal Year 1990. The improvements provided for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with city of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with city of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000, has been paid in full. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities, $142,231; Dallas, $803,787; and Grapevine, $428,786. Operations during fiscal year. operation and maintenance continued. Routine Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $4,370,410,200. 10. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is 39-6 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $937,000. 11. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX Location. Jim Chapman Lake is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.3 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts, see Annual Report of 1997. Construction of project was started in July 1958 and completed for beneficial use in May 1994. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1997, Public Law 104-206, H.R. 3816, 104'h Congress, H.R. 3816, effective September 30, 1996, changed the name of Cooper Lake and Channels, TX, to Jim Chapman Lake, TX. Estimated cost of project is $143,000,000, including $227,000 non-Federal cost for land for the levees. Local cooperation. Local interests (North Texas Municipal Water District, Sulphur River Municipal Water District, city of Irving) will utilize water impounded for present and future water supply. The total cost allocated to water supply to be reimbursed is $54,600,000. North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted for 36.859 percent of the water supply storage for future use with deferred payments for ten years. Under the contract NTMWD must pay 13.803 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Sulphur River Municipal Water District, SRMWD, has contracted for 6.5 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.78 percent for future use for a total of 26.282 percent of the water supply storage. To date, $231,374 has been paid. Under the contract, 8RMWD must pay 2.435 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date, $69,977 has been paid. The city of Irving has contracted for 16.923 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.936 for future use for a total of 36.859 of the water supply storage. To date, $665,535 has been paid. Under the contract Irving must pay 6.337 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $201,408 has been paid. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Corps of Engineers have entered into or have agreed to formal Operation and Maintenance contracts for recreation facilities and wildlife conservation and management. Under the contracts for recreation facilities dated 7 November 1988 and 11 September 1990, Texas Parks and Wildlife will be responsible for 100 percent of the operations and maintenance of two state parks that are being constructed with Federal funds. Under the contracts for wildlife conservation and management the state will be responsible for 24.14 percent of the operation, maintenance and replacement annual costs for areas totaling approximately 35,500 acres. The remaining balance will be the responsibility of the Project Sponsors and the Government. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Jim Chapman Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 are estimated at $5,022,700. 12. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Damn is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1996. Construction of project was started in 1975 and completed for beneficial use in September 1994. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 9 7 h Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Estimated cost of project is $215,540,000 including $11,350,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Water storage space 39-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 contract with the Trinity River Authority (TRA) for 142,900 acre-feet of water supply storage space was executed September 29, 1976. Current estimated capital cost for water storage space is $66,591,979, including Interest During Construction and contractor claims. Recreation development contract with the TRA Joe Pool Lake was executed August 2, 1976. Under this original recreation contract, as amended, TRA had difficulty meeting its long-term capital debt repayment obligation to the Government. As a result, H.R. 4733, Title 1, Section 102(b), 106 th Congress, 2"d Session, authorized the city of Grand Prairie, TX, to pay the Government a total of $4,290,000 in two installments in exchange for the local sponsorship of the recreation program, relieving TRA of any and all obligations. The city of Grand Prairie made its first installment in the amount of $2,150,000 on December 1, 2000, with the second and final installment, in the amount of $2,140,000, due and payable no later than December 1, 2003. The city of Grand Prairie is currently in the process of making the transition to local sponsor of recreation at Joe Pool Lake. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $905,171,300. 13. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,262. To date, NTMWD has paid $5,780,856. Under the contract, NTMWD must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $1,690,539. Operations during fiscal year. operation and maintenance continued. Routine Benefits accrued to Lavon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $211,575,200. 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $985,433 has been paid. NTMWD has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $38,505,578. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary 39-8 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project is 100 percent complete. 15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The city of Denton, Texas, COD, was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 2,000-kilowatt plant, which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. A contract with city of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage Was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denton must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $4,732,763 and Denton $211,741. Operations during fiscal year. Routine Operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake; this includes Ray Roberts Lake and Dallas Floodway Systems. Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $17,293,255,100. 16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report of 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project $13,154,000 including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $1,476,565 for water supply and $1,693,026 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. operation and maintenance continued. Routine Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $48,311,000. 17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. 39-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50- year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Additional work included refurbish and refinish the downstream side of the control gates. Total cost to complete repairs was $450,000. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $2,376,000. 18. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $632,667 for water supply and $742,507 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $38,810,700. 19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. The Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorized the Greenbelt Corridor between Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $317,300,000 (Oct. 1, 1995 base price). Public Law 96-384, 96" Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Hydropower: At the request of the city of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. The city of Denton, Texas, COD, was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 1,000- kilowatt plant, which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army, September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $223,471,352. The city of Denton has paid in full their share of the water supply storage. Dallas has paid $628,724 and Denton has paid $220,897 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. The project was physically completed in April 1999. Financial closeout of the project is continuing. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 39-10 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project: Accumulated flood damage prevented is shown in with Lewisville Dam, TX. 20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez, and Six Mile Creeks. Existing project. The project consists of 30.7 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels 120 feet below the surface each having an inside diameter of 24 feet and vertical intake, outlet and access shafts. The San Pedro Creek tunnel is 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel is 16,360 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $155,250,000 (Oct. 1, 2000, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $66,650,000, which includes $4,100,000 cash contributions and $62,550,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $221,900,000. The existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 added a Section 215 reimbursement limitation. The Water Resources Development Act of 2000 added environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after Completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply With all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $3,958,731 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 2000, funds were used to continue flood damage repairs, continue flood plain remapping, and plan formulation of Unit 8-5-2.. The project is about 99 percent complete overall and is scheduled for completion in September 2002. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 2000 were $439,000,000. 21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 39-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $17J,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000, exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to Headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and that further studies be deferred indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project is eligible for deauthorization in FY 2000, as no funds were obligated. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $37,002,800. 22. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $2,575,919 to date. Also under the contract, the Authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. operation and maintenance continued. Routine Benefits accrued to Somerville Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $66,013,400. 23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $3,301,581. Also under the 39-12 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,865,756. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Dam Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 2000 is $35,672,400. 24. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at city of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the city of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $3,141,920. Also under the contract the Authority and the city must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,537,384 and the city has paid $231,860. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for. municipal and industrial water Supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine Operation and maintenance continued. Additional Work included repair to butterfly valves, repair stilling basin, and add hike and bike trail. Total cost to complete repairs and add trail were $1,100,000. Benefits accrued to Waco Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 200w0er e $117,580,400. 25. WACO LAKE, TX (DAM SAFETY) Location. For location of completed dam see Waco Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The existing rolled earthfill embankment's top elevation of 510 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD), is hydrologically deficient. The original hydrologic design criteria used for Waco Dam design has been revised. Current hydrologic design criteria indicates the spillway and outlet works cannot pass the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) without overtopping the dam by 1.0 foot, which could lead to failure of the embankment and catastrophic release of the reservoir. Adding required freeboard, Waco Dam crest height is hydrologically deficient by 4.6 feet. The proposed modification consists of raising the dam crest approximately by 4.6 feet to 514.6 feet NGVD utilizing a combination of compacted earthfill and reinforced cast-in-place concrete parapet wall for the full length of the dam. No major modification to the spillway, spillway service bridge, outlet works tower, or outlet works tower service bridge will be required. However, the spillway hoist mechanisms for the tainter gates will be waterproofed. The outlet works service bridge will be provided with a removable bulkhead to be installed only large flood events but would otherwise remain unchanged. Estimated Federal cost for raising the dam modification is $6,260,000 (Oct. 1, 1998, base price) and $220,000 is to be reimbursed by local sponsors. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 2000 funds were used to continue construction. Project construction is scheduled to be completed March 2001. 26. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000, which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over 39-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir (now Jim Chapman Lake). This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the city has paid $858,459. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $13,859,000. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208. 10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood-protection works approved by the Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY 2000 from regular funds for maintenance were $887,871. Total costs to September 30, 2000 were $887,871. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near city of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near city of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 2000 were $277,892,300 and by Twin Buttes through FY 2000 were $1,118,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for FY 2000 from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $48,030. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 30-C.) 30. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 30-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); Emergency stream bank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricaneflood, and shore protection activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, Environmental restoration under Section 1135, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as amended; Aquatic ecosystem restoration under Section 206, Public Law 303, 10 4th Congress. Fiscal year costs were $104,322 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including power 31. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX 39-14 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project was economically feasible. The hydropower facilities include a 7,400-kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,700 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment is located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel. The plant is operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The project produces an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project, it is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non-Federal cost is $18,643,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and Project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $5,600,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the city of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date, the city has paid $656,341. Also under the contract the city of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date, the city has paid $226,325. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Additional work included embankment riprap repair. The total repair cost was $1,200,000. Benefits accrued to Sam Raybum project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $665,018,100. 33. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX (DAM SAFETY) Location. For location of completed dam see Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The original 2200-foot wide uncontrolled spillway was constructed through erodible loose sand, shaley clay, and sandstone. Based on experience of significant erosion at other uncontrolled and unlined spillways constructed through less erodible material, the spillway at Sam Rayburn Dam would have experienced severe erosion damage and probably breach during passage of floods in excess of the 150-year flood frequency (25 percent of Probable Maximum Flood). The original spillway was removed in part and replaced with a new reinforced concrete weir, stilling basin and outfall channel near the existing spillway structure. The new weir was completed December 1996 and has a width of 640 feet, an overall length of 433 feet, an outfall channel approximately 5,000 feet long and a crest elevation of 176.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). Estimated Federal cost for the spillway modification is $40,000,000 (Oct 1, 1997, base price) and $1,000,200 is to be reimbursed by hydropower sponsors, 39-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 $101,000 from the city of Lufkin and $330,000 from the Lower Neches Valley Authority. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 2000, funds were used to complete financial closeout of the project. The project was physically completed in December 1996. 34. BLUFF DAM - B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Additional work included downstream channel riprap repair. Total cost was $550,000. 35. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from city of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on the line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the Authority has paid $268,414. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Additional work included hydropower rehabilitation study and replacing transformers. Study and repair cost totaled $1,100,000. Benefits accrued to Whitney Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 2000 were $233,328,100. General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $444,376 for flood damage prevention studies; $129,211 for coordination with other agencies; $19 for review of deferred projects; $71,009 for special studies; $0 for review of completed projects; $117,211 for Planning Assistance to States; $19,998 for Inter-agency Water Resource Development; $2,134 for North American Waterfowl Management; and $93,140 for miscellaneous activities. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TX Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the city of Dallas, Damn County, Texas. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a levied floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 6,450 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $8,560,000 Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year costs were $1,687,729. GRAHAM, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN) Graham is located in Graham, Young Coulty, Texas. The plan of improvement provides a buy-oUt of 127 structures within the 10-year flood plain in the city of Graham, TX; install a flood warning system' 0to protect residents above the buy-out zone; create 39-16 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT recreational areas consisting of a trail, picnic sites, and park road; and ecosystem restoration of the project lands with native vegetation. The ecosystem restoration includes replanting of native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation. This feature will restore a portion of the bottomland hardwood forest that has been adversely impacted by past floodplain development. Planning, engineering and design estimate is $260,000, and was initiated in FY 1998. Fiscal year costs were $84,102. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TX Johnson Creek lies principally in Tarrant County with a small portion lying in Dallas County. The plan of improvement includes a buy-out of 140 structures for flood damage reduction. 155 acres of ecosystem restoration, and 2.25 miles of linear recreation features. The buy-out would prevent damages during a 25-year flood event. Planning engineering and design was initiated in FY 1999, and planning engineering arid design estimate is $210,000. Fiscal year costs were $180,323. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $353,063. Fiscal year costs were $39,689 for hydrologic studies. 39-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30,2000 " 1 Trinity River New Work: Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty Tennessee Colony Lake and Dallas Floodway Extension Aquilla Lake, TX Bardwell Lake, TX Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX Belton, Lake, TX Benbrook Lake, TX Approp Cost: New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost 0 0 560,000 577,909 0 0 1,329,000 1,271,354 3,81 1,000 4,136,348 0 0 0 0 534,560 552,535 0 0 1,248,626 1,355,681 1,600,000 1,862,152 0 0 0 0 531,206 540,153 0 0 1,437,881 1,463,439 (-) 90,000 288,379 0 0 2,636,000 2,472,745 2,556,481 2,615,172 2,210,757 2,672,650 1,656,000 1,637,734 2,091,600 1,643,236 1.539,518 2,211,506 39-18 22,574,865 22,574,865 45,506,300 45,506,300 8,925,735 8,924,550 10,934,505 Is 10,934,505 30,133,639 28,978,280 7,520,082 7,355,918 0 0 16,960,549 16,960,549 47,393,788 47,319,630 13,130,463 13,069,991 39,386,091 37.991,223 0 0 495,402 494,234 0 0 1,381,780 1,381,570 82,082 3,024 0 0 2,342,703 2,341,207 0 0 1,881,572 1,878,634 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30,2000 " 7 Canyon Lake, TX 8 Ferrels Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX 9 Grapevine Lake, TX Hords Creek Lake, TX Jim Chapman Lake, TX (contributed funds) New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,591,000 2,819,591 2,819,182 2,546,045 2,837,762 2,908,958 2,477,208 2, 1 80.427 2, 176,269 2,894,350 2,206,332 3,162,258 2,078,500 1,887,862 1,988,540 1,859,271 0 0 991,000 1,017,136 400,000 418,497 O 0 2,592,000 979,828 0 0 1,087,776 1,060,055 1,500,000 357,103 0 0 1,184,429 1,235,029 0 0 2,296,282 2,464,720 0 0 1,251,004 1,307,156 0 115,547 0 0 2,710,500 2,742,629 2,698,653 2,693,821 2,591,674 2,616,552 0 0 2,310,317 2,312,046 0 0 1,121,472 1,1 19,966 0 41,009 0 0 0 0 19,088,524 3 19,088,524 37,582,125 37,356,685 18 14,175,197 4 4 14,175,197 51,793,826 51,793,933 21,317,790 21,317,790 45,682,975 45,677,923 2,731,0898 2,731,089 22,161,672 22,095,448 138,694,887 168,666,315 227,000 227,000 11,140,329 9,555,913 39-19 10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30,2000 12 Joe Pool Lake, TX 13 Lavon Lake, TX 14 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 15 Lewisville Damrn , TX 16 Navarrro Mills Lake, TX 17 O.C.Fisher Dam and Lake, TX New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost 0 (-)8,995 701,000 684,504 0 0 2,681,000 2,392,643 0 0 0 0 2,533,328 2,348,636 0 0 1,394,000 1,367,519 0 0 0 0 742,311 769,060 0 0 2,414,617 2,710,436 0 0 o o 0 0 2,354,593 2,550,593 0 0 1,269,418 1,300,276 0 0 710,632 729,149 0 0 3,558,700 3,648,220 0 0 0 0 3,010,000 3,290,275 0 0 1,385,839 1,412,125 0 0 596,050 596,139 0 0 2,245,796 2,242,988 0 0 o o 0 0 2,926,881 2,923,443 0 0 1,340,083 1,340,570 0 0 731,000 1,077,238 858,821 755,803 696,444 1,124,866 879,065 755.398 188,960,000 188,873,609 9,158,726 9,156,614 12,864,796 12,864,796 18 53,097,908 18 53,205,310 69,796,862 69,796,862 25,333,988 25,333,988 is 65,708,237 63,142,166 9,846,759 9,846,759 28,905,853 28,904,464 16,027,467 16,027,467 25,108,81 2 25.107.194 39-20 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FYOO Sep. 30,2000 18 Proctor Lake, TX 19 Ray Roberts Lake, TX 31 Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (Contributed Funds) 32 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX 33 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (Dam Safety) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (contributed funds) New Work: Approp Cost.: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost 0 0 2,073,000 2,1 25,556 1,893,000 2,130,533 731,000 696,961 0 0 0 0 4,314,000 3,740,446 2,200,000 2,126,180 0 55,933 3,564,000 3,832,116 268,900 177,600 0 0 2, 150,233 2,1 80,765 3,000,000 2,810,234 931,265 814,104 0 0 0 0 4,018,935 4,096,596 2,600,000 2,628,705 0 117,187 1,503,000 1,816,452 43,568 1,524,905 0 0 1,776,500 1,797,287 350,000 1,024,438 747,070 945,197 0 0 0 0 4,016,033 4,682,773 0 41,563 0 0 1,034,000 977,248 0 105,858 0 0 1,724,038 1,722,744 0 110,719 1,001,638 1,000,619 0 0 0 0 4,294,428 4,293,583 0 -201,660 144,280 208,540 992,082 943,245 0 49,385 14,469,585 14,469,585 35,938,060 35,737,3431 319,778,700 319,552,712 9,412,475 9,340,184 18,628,463 18,628,463 60,670,957 60,670,957 82,165,679 81,848,979 40,514,000 40,169,942 437,895 437,895 152,878,130 152,675,456 4,001,268 5,369,148 39-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30,2000 " 21 San Gabril River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 22 Somerville Lake, TX 23 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX 34 Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake,TX 24 Waco Lake, TX New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost 0 0 1,141,000 1,436,996 Approp. 1,484,000 Cost 1,434,107 New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost: Maint, Approp. Cost 0 0 2,309,000 2,308,393 0 0 1,688,000 1,689,654 0 0 1,418,500 1,412,9 i 7 0 0 1,845,672 1,925,185 39-22 0 0 1,411,484 1,412,614 1,510,134 1,538,068 0 0 2,387,292 2,417,204 0 0 1,431,623 1,419,740 0 0 1,427,421 1,381,961 0 0 2,026,823 2,032,899 0 0 1,505,205 1,522,681 1,635,000 1,670,674 0 0 2,777,824 2,798,427 0 0 1,769,350 1,855,012 0 0 1,586,53 2 1,726,525 0 0 2,284,498 2,230,599 0 0 1,522,746 1,522,770 1,671,861 1,672,018 0 0 2,739,611 2,741,102 0 0 1,957,661 1,955,653 0 0 2,137,690 2,136,597 0 0 3,432,919 3,415,713 101,796,100 101,796,100 24,181,6361 22,887,141 23,458,168 23,457,100 27,790,438 27,790,438 0 Is 48,303,115 Is 40,218,416 20,522,084 20,522,084 Is 30,933,131 30,905,652 6,602,737 6,602,737 s18 30,018,300 29,953,460 49,521,121 49,521,121 47,064,305 46,969,946 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30,2000 7 25 Waco Lake, TX New Work: (Dam Safety) Approp 284,000 997,000 3,008,000 140,000 4,874,000 Cost: 225,002 300,366 2,442,170 1,066,326 4,455,422 35 Whitney Lake, TX New Work: Approp 0 0 0 0 42,952,938 Cost: 0 0 0 0 42,952,938 16 Maint. Is Cost 3,540,370 3,622,987 3,940,521 4,916,605 78,148,256 26 Wright Patman Dam New Work: and Lake, TX Approp 0 0 0 0 35,731,626 Cost: 0 0 0 0 35,73 1,626 Maint. 18 Approp. 2,386,292 2,500,213 2,801,450 2,531,902 50,954,377 Cost 2,204,934 2,632,788 2,950,788 2,538,921 49,949,028 A-tu,." ---i-'C-c u-e/s, aV'rj eceipts 1Irom rec--o nleyance o lanu ueuposll eu 9-CIlOPS i0vuv/ex nenue tirom contioute tuns. to miscellaneous receipts. 2Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 'Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713,and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. Includes $1,376,322 for code 711, $52,808for code 713, and #399 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real charges of $1,325, making a Iotoaf l$2 ,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1973. 'Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 that were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. o Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. " Excludes $300,000 expended fiom contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed lifunds. "Includes receipts fi-rdoismp osals and revocation of tiunds related hereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. '5E xcludes $2,750,000 expended tfocro ntributed funds. '6Ex cludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous accounts. 7 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated march 24,1983). '8Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Tables A includes Special Recreational Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have changed to conform to the new procedure. 39-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2 Aug. 13, 1968 3 Mar. 31, 1960 4 Oct. 12, 1972 5 Jul. 24, 1946, Sep. 3, 1954 6 Mar. 2, 1945 7 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 8 Jul. 24, 1946 9 Mar. 2, 1945 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRINGS TX Construction of a channel. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Leon River, about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 mile southwest of Fort Worth, Texas CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX. Provides for construction of an earthfill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas. Texas. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., Ist Sess. H.Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 115, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc.403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. 39-24 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10 Aug. 3, 1941 11 Aug. 3, 1955 12 Oct. 27, 1965 13 Mar. 2, 1945 14 Oct. 23,1962 15 HORD'S CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hord's Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX Construction of an earthfill dam and reservoir area. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dari on the East Fork of the Trinity River, about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNELS IMPROVEMENT, TX IagcrL i Dwr ad tatialnnc wpnt andi n airIe LaavOnl _am an eallUguemllllu realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Mar. 7, 1974 Improvement of Collin County Road I 15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX 16 Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsican Texas. Dec. 31, 1970 Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc.488. 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H . Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Settion Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17 Aug. 18,1941 18 Sep. 3, 1954 19 Oct. 27,1965 32 Mar. 2, 1945 33 Mar. 2, 1945 O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX. Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Darnm. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Modification of the spillway and embankment H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 276, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., I st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., Ist Sess.. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX 20 Sep. 3, 1954 Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX 21 Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Jan. 3, 1975 Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-26 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 23 Sep. 3, 1954 34 Mar. 2, 1945 31 Mar. 2, 1945 1 Oct. 27, 1965 24 25 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with Town Bluff-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South and Middle Bosque Rivers Sep. 3, 1954 WACO LAKE, TX (DAM AND SAFETY) Modification of raising the dam crest. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st, Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-27 - -~-- Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 39-B See Date Section Authorizing .A_ AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WHITNEY LAKE, TX 35 Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of a dam on the Brazos River about H. Doc. 390, 76th 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise Cong., Ist Sess. the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 26 Jul.24, 1946 Construction of an earth-filled dam and reservoir. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong. 2nd Sess. 39-28 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 39-C (See Section 29 of Text) For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1999 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Belton Lake Hydropower Study, TX 5 Belton Lake Modification, TX' 1988 Big Fossil Creek, TX' 1969 Big Sandy Lake, TX 5 1986 Big Spring, TX' 1979 Boggy Creek, Austin, TX' 1992 Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX 5 Calloway Branch Hurst, TX' 1986 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX5 1979 Dam "A" Lake, TX5 1987 Duck Creek Channel Improvements, TX 5 1983 Elm Fork Floodway, TX 5 1987 Forth Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX' 1971 Forth Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX' 1971 Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)' 1987 Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road)' 1989 Greenville, TX ' 1983 Lake Brown Modification, TX' 1983 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX' Lake Worth, Tarrant County, TX 4 Millican, TX4 1988 Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX 5 Roanoak Lake, TX' 1979 Rockland Lake, TX s 1988 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX' 1969 San Gabriel River, South, TX4 Tarrant County, Tony's Marine Creek, TX4 Zacate Creek Channel, TX' 1983 Completed Inactive 3Deferred 4Recommended for Deauthorization 'Deauthorized 39-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 39-D (See Section 27 in Text) Location Beals Creek Bear Creek, Collin County Beltline Road Bridge, Richardson Big Fossil Creek Floodway, Richland Hills Boggy Creek Floodway, Austin Calloway Branch Channel, Hurst Calloway Branch, Airline Dr. Pk., Richland Hills Cat Claw Creek Channel, Abilene Dallas Floodway, Dallas Delaware Branch, Irving Dry Branch, Grand Prairie Duck Creek, Garland East Fork Floodway, Kaufman County Fort Worth Floodway, Tarrant County Grand Prairie Landfill, Grand Prairie Hutton Branch, Carrollton Johnson Creek Channel, Grand Prairie Long Branch Channel, Greenville Lorean Branch Channel, Hurst McCoy Road Bridge, Carrollton Meyers Road, Grand Prairie Munday Floodway, Mundy Park Row Bridge, Arlington Pleasanton Floodway, Pleasanton Poteet Floodway , Poteet Ridglea Country Club Drive Bridge , Fort Worth Roaring Springs Road Bridge, Westover Hills Rush Creek Channel, Arlington San Antonio Floodway, San Antonio San Antonio Tunnels, San Antonio Singing Hills Creek Channel, Watauga Sulphur Branch Channel, Euless Ten Mile Creek, Desoto Walnut Creek, Seguin Wheeler Creek Channel, Gainesville Zacate Creek Floodway. Laredo Dates of Inspection Jul. 7, 1999 Mar. 9, 1999 Nov. 19, 1999 Mar. 15, 2000 Aug. 19, 1999 Dec. 8, 1999 Aug. 10, 2000 Jul. 20, 2000 Oct. 20, 2000 Sept. 30, 1999 Jul. 19, 2000 Aug. 8, 2000 Nov. 30, 1994 Oct. 6, 1999 Feb. 17, 2000 Nov. 19, 1999 Jun. 22, 2000 Feb. 3, 2000 Dec, 13, 199 Nov. 19, 1999 Feb.17, 2000 Dec. 13, 1999 Feb. 16, 2000 Sept. 23, 2000 Sept. 23, 2000 Under Construction Feb. 3, 2000 Feb. 16, 2000 Sept. 22, 1999 Aug. 19, 1998 Mar. 30, 2000 Dec. 7, 1999 Jun. 2 3, 1999 Aug. 25, 2000 Jun. 21, 2000 Sept.~ 39-30 -- -- --- FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 39-E (See Section 30 of Text) Project Flood Control Activities Section 205 Cost Cienegas Creek, Del Rio, TX $ 48,840 Duck Creek, Garland, TX 464,049 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX 1,038 Little Fossil Creek, Haltom City, TX 114,901 San Felipe, Del Rio, TX 65,412 Section 205 Coordination Acct. 13,826 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX 33,924 Project Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Section 206 Cost Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration $ 40,365 Miscellaneous 431,063 Preliminary Restoration Plans 22,190 Section 206 Coordination Acct. 18,174 Project Ecosystem Restoration Section 1135 Cost Big Cypress Bayou Fish & Wildlife Habitat Initial Appraisals Joppa Preserve Restoration Lewisville Aquatic Wildlife Habitat Lewisville Lake Wildlife Habitat Old Trinity River Channel Wildlife Restoration Proctor Lake Wetland Restoration Section 1135 Coordination Acct. Proiect S.trpom RInk Protection Section 14 Bear Creek, Collin County, TX Brazos River, Waco Sewerage System Colorado River, Smithville Water Supply, TX Mary's Creek Section 14 Coordination Acct. West Fork Trinity River Landfill, Arlington, TX West Fork Trinity River Water Plant, TX $ 5,737 31,070 77,134 45,662 21,435 115,951 75,209 18,043 Cost $ 9,609 71,020 230,286 173,784 836 20,983 494,971 39-31 ""Anim AIr air v~,, Proieet GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT* GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffa!o Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffinm Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. 40-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION................................................... 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, TX ............. 3 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX .................. 3 3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX. .................................... 3 4. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX...........4 5. CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, TX....4 6. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX ....4 7. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX...................................5 8. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX ............................ 5 9. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX........................... ................... ...6.... 10. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND THE MEXICAN BORDER .......................................... 7 11. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX................................ ............9 12. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX ............. 10 13. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... 11 14. NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARIER AT BEAUMONT TX 11 15. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX...... 12 16. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX ................... 12 17. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX ... . . .... .. .. *.*............ .. ...... .. ..... *.....1.. 13 17A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX ................ 13 17B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX ................ 13 17C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX ..................... 14 18. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ................................. ....... 15 19. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ...................................... 15 SHORE PROTECTION ....................................... 15 20. CORPIS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) ......................... 15 FLOOD CONTROL........................................ 15 21. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX ..................................... .. ............. 15 21A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX ................................................................. 16 21B. BRAYS BAYOU ................................... 16 21C. GREENS BAYOU................................. 17 21D. HALLS BAYOU ................................. 17 21E. HUNTING BAYOU .............................. 17 21F. LITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX........18 21G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX ................. 18 22. BUFFALO BAYOU, TX (LYNCHBURG PUM P STATION) .............................................. 18 23. CLEAR CREEK, TX .................................. 18 24. CYPRESS CREEK, TX...............................19 25. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX ......... 19 25A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX ........2.0........ 25B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX ......2.0....... 25C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX..............20 26. SIMS BAYOU, TX ................2.0................. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS ..................2.1.................. 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ...........2.1........... 29. EMERGENCY STREAM RANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION............21 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION............22 30. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT...........22 31. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION .........................................2..2.............................. 32. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED M ATERIAL..................... .............2.2....................... 33. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY- TEXAS POINT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, TX22 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS........................22 34. SURVEYS ........................... .2.2.................... 35. COORDINATION WITH OTHER .....2.2....... 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC D A TA ..................................2 .3.............................. 37. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .....................8.23......................... TABLE 40-A ................................ .24....... COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT........24 TABLE 40-B ...................... ........ ..*.3.0..... AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION .......3.0........... TABLE 40-C ...................... .........48... OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS .................................. 48 TABLE 40-D ...............................4.9. 4." .49 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS .............. .. ................. 49 TABLE 40-E.................. ........... ...5.0... OTHER AUTHORIZED ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECTS ..........5.0.......... T A BL E 4 0 -F ..................... . . . . . . . . . ....... -- *.*.. 51 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS.....................51 TA BLE 40-G .......................5.2............................. TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS ..... 52 TABLE 40-H ..... .... ..............-. .54 CHANNEL DIMENSIONS...........-. .. 59 TA BLE 40-I ......... ..... .......... .......... ....5.9.- GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ...59 EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS,......59 TABLE 40-J E...........61 DREDGING OPERATION=S======.=.=..=.=..=.= ===6 40-2 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, TX (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of water-hyacinth and alligatorweed has been approved for the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Control of hydrilla and watermilfoil is on a site by site basis after analysis and issuance of National Environmental Policy Act documentation Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. The cost-sharing program had been funded for $31,000 for FY 98, but chemical control work by the State of Texas was curtailed through FY00 to await interpretation of herbicide labelling instructions by the Environmental Rotection Agency. Chemical control work has been reinstated by the state for FY01. Only mechanical cotrol of waterhyacinth and hydrilla is accomplished by the State along segments of the Rio Grande. A new oWn-year cost-sharing, cost-reimbursable contract, with the options for an additional four years, has been negotiated with the State of Texas to maintain Program apabilities in the event of future funding. Cost incurred for Fiscal Year 2000 was $9,810. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 4ils east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Srvey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 40-H. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The entrance channel was enlarged from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 feet in FY 1992. Construction of an environmental mitigation site consisting of the creation of a 16 acre tidal wetland which included shoal grass and black mangroves, was completed in 1997. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX. Location. The bayou is about 30 miles long. It flows to the south and empties into northwest corner of upper Galveston Bay, about 1.5 miles below mouth of San Jacinto River and about 28.5 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Project provides for a channel 10 feet by 100 feet from Houston Ship Channel to Bayou Mile 11.0. Channel was completed from Houston Ship Channel to first bend in Cedar Bayou above the mouth in 1931. Channel from Mile -0.1 to Mile 3.0 was completed in March 1975. Channel from 3.0 to Mile 40-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 11.0 was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of Public Law 93- 251 and re-authorized in December 2000 under Sec. 349 (a)(2) of Public Law 106-541, the Water Resources Development Act of 2000. Project also includes jetties at mouth of bayou provided for under previous project. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 0.6 feet and extreme range 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. U.S. Steel Company has a barge dock at bayou mile 2.8, and there are a few small wharves, privately owned, for local use at various places along Cedar Bayou. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 4. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for channel are shown in Table 40-H. (Also see Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range 2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and approximately 950 feet long is maintained across the east end of the turning basin to accommodate the Galveston-Port Bolivar ferry. Project is complete except for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are used as anchorage by shallow-draft vessels. A highway ferry landing owned by the State of Texas is located at south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 5. CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, TX Location. Clear Creek has its source about 18 miles south of Houston, Texas, and flows southeast for about 25 miles, emptying into west side of upper Galveston Bay at a point 24 miles north west of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Existing project. Project provides for 1.5 miles of channel 7 feet by 75 feet from Galveston Bay to mouth of Clear Creek; 0.7 miles of channel 7 feet by 60 feet, known as North Fork Channel; and 7.7 miles of channel 7 feet by 60 feet through Clear Creek and Clear Lake. The project was completed in June 1950. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 0.8 foot and extreme range 1.4 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of small privately owned wharves, several ship repair yards and marinas which accommodate light commercial vessels and pleasure yachts. These are along lake shore and at towns of Seabrook and Kemah at mouth of creek. A commercial shell loading dock is located near League City at the head of NASA-Manned Spacecraft Center has a barge dock along lake shore near their property. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance required for fiscal year. 6. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel fronm Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin a Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery 40-4 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 40-H for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non-Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1992 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. Construction contract for mitigation terracing was completed in 1997. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1993, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 7. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX Location. Enters Trinity Bay on the east side about 30 miles north of Galveston and about 8.25 miles south of Anahuac, Texas. Existing Project. Project provides for a channel 7 feet by 125 feet from the mouth of Double Bayou to the 7- foot contour in Trinity Bay, a length of 3.9 miles; and a channel, know as West Fork, 7 feet by 100 feet for a length of 2.0 miles. The project was completed in 1971. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.5 feet and extreme range is about 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on winds, and during strong north winds in the winter season, water surfaces may be depressed 1.5 feet below mean low tide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Local cooperation. Fully Complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are privately owned. At the mouth of the bayou is a timber wharf for loading oil barges. Between miles 1 and 1.5 above the mouth is a timber wharf, a boat slip, and a marine railway owned by the Brown and Root Corporation. At mile 3 above the mouth is a small depot for handling oyster shell. The facility consists of a timber bulkhead and hoppers for loading trucks. One-half mile above the mouth are several fishing vessel docks. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: maintenance required for Fiscal Year 2000. No 8. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. 40-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 40-H on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93- 251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. The 45-foot channel was completed in 1993 as follows: Relocation of the U. S. Coast Guard station was completed in May 1990; dredging the channel and turning basin to 36-feet and the Upper Turning Basin to 46-feet was completed in July 1990; dredging the jetty channel and the Lower Turning Basin was completed in November 1990; Construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was completed in March 1991; dredging the entrance channel was completed in April 1992; dredging the Main channel, Brazosport turning basin and jetty channel was completed in June 1992; construction of public use facilities and grading and stone protection was completed in August 1992; and rehabilitation of the south jetty and addition of 500-feet to the north jetty was completed in May 1993. Navigation problems were identified by the Local Sponsor and pilots, and a contract to make channel adjustments to a bend near the project main turning basin was completed in 1998 to provide full utilization of the 45-foot channel. Project is essentially complete. Construction of final recreation area at Quintana by the Local Sponsor is the last remaining item. (See Table 40- G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $63,707,000 Federal (Corps) and $470,000 Federal (USCG); and $32,313,000 non-Federal, including $21,302,000 contributed funds, $300,000 contributed work, $6,967,000 lands, $3,174,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1997 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, under cost-sharing tenets of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 26, 1986, along with Amendments 1, 2, 3, and 4 executed March 19, 1987; July 19, 1991; July 19, 1991; and July 15, 1997; respectively, require that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $10,141,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $530,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, including disposal facility construction, presently estimated at $21,302,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: No new work for FY 00. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40- J for dredging operations.) 9. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 40-H. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, 40-6 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36-foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 16. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 11, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX, for work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1996). A container ship terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal container ship has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are Considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 11, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX. Maintenance: Routine Maintenance. Also see Section 11, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 10. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND THE MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey 40-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 40-1 on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Mouth of Colorado River: Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Construction of a navigation channel from the Gulf to the GIWW and an impoundment basin were fiscally completed in 1991. Construction of Tiger Island Dam and recreation facilities were also completed in 1991. Construction of the recreation facilities at Jetty Park was completed in 1992. Construction of the diversion dam and connecting channel was completed in 1993. Construction of the oyster cultch was completed in 1995. Brazos River Floodgates- Major Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation of the East Floodgate Guidewalls was completed in 1997. The cost of rehabilitation was $2,750,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,750,000 Federal (Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Sargent Beach: Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 for construction of a concrete-pile and concrete block revetment structure which extends 8 - miles to protect the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway was completed in 1998. Construction cost was $29,460,000 Federal (Corps) and $29,460,000 Federal (Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (2) Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for construction of bank protection and a spill containment system through the critical habitat for the endangered whooping crane. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Channel to Victoria - $28,391,000 Federal (Corps), $422,000 Federal (Department of Transportation), $62,000 Federal (U.S. Coast Guard), and $6,645,000 non-Federal consisting of $3,155,000 cash, $1,646,000 lands, $190,000 fender system, and $1,654,000 levees and other associated costs. (October 1, 2000 base prices.) Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - $15,430,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 2000 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. The Project Cooperation Agreement for Channel to Victoria was executed November 17, 1994. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1996), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1983) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1991), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760- foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: - Channel to Victoria - The construction contcrat for dredging Stations 835+00 to 1300+00, awarded May 28, 1999, was completed in August 2000 at a cost of $3,858,122 (Federal) and $428,680 (contributed funds) 40-8 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT A construction contract for dredging Stations 1300+00 to 1841+21.69 was awarded September 29, 2000. No cost was incurred for FY 00. Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - The contract for erosion protection at Welder Flats, awarded March 1999 and physically completed in September 1999 was financially completed in FY 00 with a final cost of $11,090. The final erosion protection and channel improvement contract was awarded March 20, 2000 and was 97 percent complete at year-end with a cost of $4,153,185. Cost incurred for a Dredged Material Management Plan was $282,390 for FY 99 and $69,266 for FY 00. Maintenance: - Main Channel and Tributaries - Repairs to mooring dolphins along the GIWW at a cost of $491,665 were made in FY 00. The cost incurred for 2000 for Dredged Material Management Plans was $216,213 for Corpus Christi to Port Isabel. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - No maintenance cost was incurred for FY 00. Brazos River Floodgates - The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,082,296. A construction contract to rehabilitate the east and west floodgates was awarded May 17, 2000 and continued through Fiscal Year 2000 at a cost of $400,000. Channel to Victoria - A mowing contract was awarded in February 2000 at a cost of $28,300. A series of archeological services contracts were issued during FY 00 for continued cultural resources work at Channel to Victoria Barge Canal sites 41CL59, 41CL76, and 41VT98. Continued artifact analysis and processing (FY 00 total of $280,854) was conducted for site 41CL59, which was initially excavated under full data recovery mitigation in FY 97. Site 41CL59 is an extensive prehistoric shell and earth midden with an occupation range dating from 400 B.C. to A.D. 1000. Archeological site 41CL76 is located just upstream from 41CL59. The site was tested for National Register of Historic Places eligibility during FY 99 for a total cost of $61,233. Post-testing work, including preparation, review, and approval of the final report of ivestigations, indicates that 41CL76 is eligible for National Register- and will require data recovery excavations prior to it's eventual demise due to ongoing bankline erosion along the Barge Canal. Initial data recovery excavations were launched during the last quarter of FY 00 for site 41VT98. The site has been identified as Archaic Period (ca. 2,500-3,500 B.C.) cemetery and occupation site. Data recovery (field Work) excavations were issued under a separate delivery order for a total of $526,808. Excavations are planned to continue through FY 01, followed by post- fieldwork artifact analysis and report preparation that will be conducted throughout FY 01 and upcoming fiscal years 02-03. Colorado River Locks - The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,038,173. Channel to Port Mansfield - Routine Maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) Chocolate Bayou -Cost incurred for a Dredged Material Management Plan was $34,354. Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) Mouth of Colorado River - A contract to rehabilitate the jetty walkway was awarded August 22, 2000 and incurred a cost of $50,000 for FY 00. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 11. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX Location. Houston Ship Channel connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. The entrance to Galveston Harbor and Channel is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf from Galveston, Texas and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Existing project. See Section 9, GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX and Section 12, HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX for project prior to October 1998. New authorized project provides for enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to a depth of 45 feet over a width which varies between 650 and 1,112 feet, and deepening the Galveston Harbor Channel to 47 feet (45-feet authorized and 2 feet for dredging inaccuracies and wind impact) over its original 800-foot width and 10.5 mile length; and extending the channel an additional 3.9 miles to the 47-foot bottom contour in the Gulf of Mexico along existing alignment. A dredged-material disposal plan, which would utilize confined or beneficial uses of dredged material in the bay and/or offshore disposal and 118 acres of Oyster mitigation is also provided in the project. Estimated cost for new work is: $379,177,000 Federal (Corps) which includes $86,726,000 for deferred environmental construction; $3,720,000 Federal (U.S. Coast Guard); and $129,803,000 non-Federal consisting of $66,273,000 cash, $994,000 lands, and $54,000 relocations for general navigation features; $8,977,000 40-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 for berthing areas; and $53,505,000 cash for environmental restoration which includes $28,909,000 for deferred environmental construction. (October 1, 2000 base price.) The dredging plan for construction consists of nine reaches as follows: Offshore Entrance Channel Extension, Offshore Jetty and Entrance Channel, Lower Bay, Mid-Bay, Upper Bay, Lower Bayou, Goat Island, Upper Bayou and the Galveston Channel. Other construction includes Oyster Reef Mitigation and creation of marsh sites at Lower Bay, Mid Bay and Upper Bay disposal areas. The first construction contract to dredge the Entrance Channel Extension, awarded August 7, 1998, was completed in 1999. The contract for dredging the entrance channel and jetty area was completed in March 2000. The Oyster Reef Mitigation contract was completed in July 2000. Construction continued through FY 00 on the Lower Bay and the Upper Bayou contracts. Construction was initiated on Upper Bay and Lower Bayou in FY 00. Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, apply. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction including in-kind work in connection with construction; and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations. The Port of Houston Authority and the City of Galveston are the sponsors for the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement with the Port of Houston Authority was executed on June 10, 1998. The Project Cooperation Agreement with the City of Galveston is pending. Terminal facilities. See Section 9, GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX and Section 12, HOUSTON SHIP CHANNII.TX. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract for dredging the remaining entrance channel and jetty area, awarded March 19, 1999, was physically completed in March 2000 and incurred a cost of $24,040,274 for FY 00. Construction contract for dredging Lower Bay, awarded September 4, 1998, continued through FY 00 at a cost of $32,799,150. The construction contract for dredging Upper Bayou, awarded October 26, 1998, continued through FY 00 at a cost of $4,912,288 for the year. The contract to construct an oyster reef, awarded March 12, 1999, was physically completed in July 2000 for a FY 00 cost of $12,420,249. A construction contract for dredging Upper Bay was awarded January 19, 2000, and continued through FY 00 at a cost of $11,871,049. The contract to dredge Lower Bayou was awarded April 21, 2000 and continued through FY 00 at a cost of $5,351,938. Maintenance: See Section 9, GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX and Section 12, HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX for maintenance of existing channels. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 12. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 40-H. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. See Section 11, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX for. work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San JacintO River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and I foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dans for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo BayoU Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. 40-10 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Houston Ship Channel. Local Cooperation Agreement for assumption of maintenance on Bayport Ship Channel was executed April 6, 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for assumption of maintenance on Barbour Terminal Channel and Greens Bayou Channel were both executed on February 8, 1994. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modem terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1989), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 11, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX. Maintenance: A contract for emergency levee relocation of the Rosa Allen Placement Area was awarded October 29, 1999, and completed in FY 00 for a cost of $2,297,768. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) See Section 11, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX. 13. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 40-H on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "fnorthers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 14. NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARIER AT BEAUMONT TX Location. The project is located just below the Big Thicket National Preserve and the confluence of Pine Island Bayou and the Neches River at Beaumont, Texas, in Jefferson and Orange Counties on the upper coast of Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11343.) Existing project. The project will provide for an overflow dam in the Neches River, a gated salt water barrier consisting of five 56 feet by 24.5 feet tainter gates; a gated navigation bypass channel with a clear opening of 56 feet and a depth of 16 feet; an access road and levee; and an auxiliary dam across a canal which drains an adjacent bayou. Estimated cost for new work is $42,384,000 Federal (Corps) and $14,128,000 non- Federal consisting of $8,389,000 contributed funds, $222,000 for lands, $5,517,000 for relocations. (October 1, 2000 base price.) The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Sec. 102, PL 94-587). The construction contract was awarded September 18, 2000 and work began in October. Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is the Lower Neches Valley Authority. Report of the Chief of Engineers for the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorization cited a 1974 Waterways Experiment Station report, which concluded that 75 percent of the salinity in the Neches River at Beaumont was due to the Federal deep draft navigation project to Beaumont and 25 percent was due to withdrawals by water users. From 1994 to 1996, the Corps reevaluated the project which resulted in a May 1997 decision by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), to direct that the project go forward with 75 percent Federal / 25 percent non-Federal cost-sharing as a navigation mitigation project. In October 1999, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) issued a decision stating that operations and maintenance will also be cost-shared as 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on May 22, 2000. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The architectural, engineering and design contract was 40-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 completed in FY 00 at a fiscal year cost of $476,221. The contract to construct the saltwater barrier and the other project features was awarded September 18, 2000. No cost was incurred for FY 00. 15. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine- Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 40-H on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine Maintenance. A construction contract to repair the road on Placement Areas No. 8 and No. 11 awarded August 31, 1999, was completed in FY 00 at a cost of $1,895,864. A contract to repair the spillway pipes on the north spill box of Placement Area No. 11 was awarded September 29, 2000 and incurred a cost of $23,876 for FY 00. A contract for dewatering Placement Area No. 8 was awarded September 5, 2000 and a cost of $50,000 was expended in FY 00. Mosquito control spraying was performed in FY 00 for $58,006. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 16. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on 40-12 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. The project is currently in the "deferred" category. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Shoal Point (formerly known as Snake Island), $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. (October 1, 1988 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1996), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance was required for the fiscal year. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 17. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is forned at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1933. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 40-G for total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 17A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, Ist Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was incurred during the fiscal year. 17B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty, which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the 40-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and I mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.). Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-J for dredging operations.) 17C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 3,800 acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 2 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. (The reservoir was reduced from 5600 acres with a maximum pool elevation of 4 feet N.G.V.D. by agreement to protect the endangered bald eagle.) Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas; and three water control structures to control salinity intrusion and regulate freshwater flows to the saltwater marsh west of the river. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 14,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $81,200,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 2000 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered its Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to recommence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and Local Sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1991 provided $9,200,000 for the project and directive language for continuation of construction. In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were discovered nesting at the project site which led to additional consultation under the Endangered Species Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was signed in September 1991. Environmental documents were approved and construction was resumed. A contract to rehabilitate and complete the navigation lock, complete the North and South navigation channels, construct a new administrative/resident office building, and electrical and mechanical equipment controls for the controlled spillway structure was awarded in December 1995 and completed in FY 99. A dedication ceremony for the Wallisville Lake Project was held on November 1, 1999. Construction of Control Structure A was completed in February 2000 and Cedar Hill Park was completed in October 2000. 40-14 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT Work remaining consists of repairs to the West Non-Overflow Dam and construction of public use facilities, remediate abandoned dam and remove skimmers, replace timbers and construct a boat ramp and dock. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, onehalf of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $12,180,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The architect/engineering contract, awarded April 4, 1994 to prepare plans and specifications and cost estimates for lock rehabilitation and construction of new facilities, completed the design in 1996 and completed providing construction phase services at a cost of $15,646 for FY 99. The construction contract for lock rehabilitation and construction of new facilities, awarded December 22, 1995, was completed in FY 99 at a cost of $2,428,791. A construction contract for Control Structure A, awarded January 27, 1999 and physically completed in February 2000, incurred a cost of $1,161,033 for FY 99 and $959,447 in FY 00. A contract to construct Cedar Hill Park was awarded February 28, 2000 and physically completed in October 2000 for a cost of $614,448 for FY 00. Vegetation was removed along the access road for a cost of $144,428. The contract was awarded April 27, 2000 and completed in 2000. A contract for repairs to the west non-overflow dam and construction of public use facilities was awarded August 7, 2000 and continued through FY 00 at a cost of $298, 416. Maintenance: The Wallisville Lake Project was turned over for permanent operations at the beginning of FY 00. The project was operated and maintained at a cost of $878,892. 18. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted in FY 2000 at a total cost of $15,777. The surveys were on the following projects: Greens Bayou Jan-Jul 00 Chocolate Bayou Apr-Aug 00 Barbour Terminal May 00 Texas City Ship Channel Dec 99- Aug 00 19. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization): Initial coordination for Section 107 navigation activities was performed in FY 00 at a cost of $3,190. Mitigation of shore damages attributable to navigation projects pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483: No mitigation of shore damages studies were performed in FY 99. Shore Protection 20. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project was completed. The study indicated that there was no economic justification for continued Federal participation in the program. The responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. The project was financially closed out in FY 99. Flood Control 21. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection 40-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 21A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the City of Houston in Harris and Fort Bend Counties, Texas. Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating the final two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was complete in 1963. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work accomplished included raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam I to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for costsharing in the construction of recreation facilities was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in 1986 and remain in use. Community Park West (Phase 4) and the development of Community Park 2 (soccer fields, ball fields, and parking lots) were completed by the City of Houston in 1992. Harris County Precinct 3 completed building additional soccer fields in Community Park 2 in George Bush Park. The Fort Bend County YMCA pavilion, archery range, and nature trails in Barker Reservoir are being heavily used. Maintenance and improvements of these recreation areas continue by all agencies. Maintenance: A contract to install, maintain and repair piezometers at Addicks and Barker was awarded and completed in the summer of 2000 for a cost of $98,965. Construction contracts to rehabilitate and improve the parking and storage areas at the project site and to repair about 20,000 feet of road on top of Barker Dam and about 10,000 feet of road on top of Addicks Dam are planned for next fiscal year. 21B. BRAYS BAYOU Location. The project is located in the southcentral portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $266,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $157,177,000 non-Federal consisting of $23,487,000 cash contributions, and $133,690,000 for lands and relocations (October 2000 base price). The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101- 640). In 1995, the project was divided into two separable elements, a Detention Element (stream improvements and detention basins) and a Diversion Element. The Local Sponsor was authorized to develop the project and design and construct an alternative to the diversion component and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 40-16 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT (PL 104-303). Construction funds were received in 1998. Location cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control presently estimated at $23,487,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. A Project Cooperation Agreement for the detention element was executed March 3, 2000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction by the Local Sponsor of the Detention Element is currently underway. Reimbursement to Harris County Flood Control District was made in July 2000 for the following completed segments of the Sam Houston Detention Basin: Discrete Segment #1, Compartment 3- $1,916,116; Discrete Segment #3, Compartment 1, Phase 1- $1,156,012; and Discrete Segment #4, Compartment 1, Phase 2- $1,810,635. In accordance with Section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, the sponsor is investigating the Diversion element in an effort to find an alternative to the authorized project. 21C. GREENS BAYOU Location. The project is located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does not include the Halls Bayou tributary. Existing project. The authorized plan of imnprovement consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $160,251,000 Federal (Corps) and $97,307,000 non-Federal consisting of $15,215,000 cash contributions, and $82,092,000 for lands and relocations (October 2000 base price). The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101- 640). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $15,215,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 37, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 21D. HALLS BAYOU Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $70,908,000 Federal (Corps) and $52,871,000 non-Federal consisting of $7,921,000 cash contributions, and $44,950,000 for lands and relocations (October 2000 base price). The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101- 640). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $7,921,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 21E. HUNTING BAYOU Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business district. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $69,992,000 Federal (Corps) and $62,730,000 non-Federal consisting of $7,102,000 cash contributions, and $55,628,000 for lands and relocations (October 2000 base price). The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101- 640). The Local Sponsor was authorized to design and construct an alternative to the project and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide 40-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 a cash contribution presently estimated at $7,102,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 37, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 21F. LITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,957,000 non- Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101- 640). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 21G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo Bayou in northeastern Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101- 640). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $370,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 22. BUFFALO BAYOU, TX (LYNCHBURG PUMP STATION) Location. The project is located 10 miles east of Houston, Texas near the entrance to the Houston Ship Channel. Existing project. The Lynchburg Pump Station is to be protected by a flood barrier encircling the facility. A plan consisting of a combination sheet pile wall and earth levee is recommended. Total barrier length is approximately 2000 feet. The Crosby-Lynchburg Road will be rerouted to the top of the levee. Local cooperation. The Coastal Water Authority, owned by the City of Houston, is the Local Sponsor of the project. Operation during the fiscal year. The Detailed Project Study was completed in September 1996. An implementation plan in the amount of $5,985,000 has been tentatively agreed upon by the Local Sponsor, subject to approval by higher authority of the Corps of Engineers. Pending resolution of Project Cooperation Agreement issues, construction could be initiated in FY 2002 if funds are available. 23. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 19.1, Was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $80,393,000 Federal (Corps) and $55,464,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,792,000 cash contributions, $22,600,000 for lands 40-18 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT and $26,072,000 for relocations (October 1, 2000 base price). Environmental interest groups and agencies, private citizens, and some local communities located near or adjacent to Clear Lake expressed opposition to the Clear Creek Flood Control Project as currently authorized and planned for upstream reaches. In general, the opposition to the project has been focused on environmental concerns in the upstream reaches and on induced flooding concerns downstream in Clear Lake. Construction has been delayed at the request of the Local Sponsor so that an alternative to the authorized project can be developed that will reduce above concerns and still provide flood protection to those that are critically affected by flood waters in the watershed. Local cooperation. Local Sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 30, 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Preparation of the General Reevaluation Report (GRR) continued. The Galveston District and the local sponsors for the General Reevaluation study (Harris County Flood Control District, Galveston County, and Brazoria Drainage District No. 4) updated the databases for the Clear Creek watershed and prepared for the initial public meeting. The database update included state-of - the-art aerial photogrammetry, new surveys that included elevations of over 3000 homes and structures, and new demographic and socioeconomic information. Six years of litigation between the Corps of Engineers, Harris County and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company over a proposed replacement bridge came to an end. A final settlement of $1,113,855.43 was received to reimburse the initial $905,000 placed in the court's escrow account in 1995 and the interest earned in the amount of $208, 855.43. 24. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of provement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 Tiles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. The authorized plan is no longer under consideration. The current plan is to buy out or raise houses where inhabitants are at or below the five year flood level. Estimated cost for the new plan is $4,463,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,487,000 non-Federal contribution. (October 1, 1999 base price.) Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County. The non-Federal share of the cost of non-structural flood control measures shall be 25 percent of the cost of such measures. The non-Federal interests for any such measures shall be required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for the project, but shall not be required to contribute any amount in cash during construction of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work during FY 2000: The General Reevaluation Report was approved September 27, 1999-just prior to FY 2000. The revised project consisted of removing the 35 homes from the five year flood level. The sponsor wished to implement the project as quickly as possible; therefore, the Harris County Flood Control District and the Corps of Engineers negotiated a Section 215 Agreement. This agreement would provide reimbursement to the sponsor for the Federal share of funds expended to implement the project once a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed and funds appropriated for construction. The Section 215 Agreement was executed January 5, 2000. The sponsor began acquiring homes in June 1999 and began demolition of the structures in February 2000. Negotiations began on the PCA, and continued through the fiscal year 2000. 25. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 40-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 25A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated cost for new work is $5,851,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,951,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,848,000 cash and $103,000 for lands and relocations (October 1, 1993 base prices). The project has reached a stalemate as the Local Sponsor, the Hidalgo County Drainage District #1, can not provide required guarantee to hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement for the project, nor are they able to operate and maintain the project when completed. The International Boundary and Water Commission has complete jurisdiction over the project as it is one of the elements of the Rio Grande Floodway System. The Commission is interested in the project but only if additional funds to do operations and maintenance are provided. Legislative approval will be required to alter the current status. Local cooperation. Local Sponsor, the Hidalgo County Drainage District #1, is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,848,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. None. 25B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated cost for new work is $132,791,000 Federal (Corps) and $72,386,000 non-Federal consisting of $10,259,000 cash and $28,107,000 lands and $34,020,000 relocations (October 1, 2000 base prices). Local cooperation. Local Sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $10,259,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 37, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 25C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madre for northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new work is $60,822,000 Federal (Corps) and $20,274,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,374,000 cash and $6,142,000 lands and $7,758,000 relocations (October 1, 2000 base prices). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,374,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 37, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 26. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris CountY, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.3 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hikeand- bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $220,230,000 Federal (Corps) and $108,276,000 non-Federal consisting of $19,326,000 cash contributions, 40-20 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT $39,988,000 for lands, $48,660,000 for relocations and $302,000 for channels (October 1, 2000 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract for channel rectification from Hemingway Drive to Reveille Park, awarded December 22, 1994, was physically completed January 1998, but remains financially open. The construction contract for channel rectification from Swallow to Hemingway, awarded July 19, 1996, was physically completed in January 1999, but is not financially complete. Surveys were performed by contract in connection with plans and specifications for the Cullen to State Highway 288 reach and the State Highway 288 to Union Pacific Railroad reach at a cost of $455,316. Construction contract for channel rectification from Swallow to Mykawa, awarded November 20, 1997, continued through FY 00 at a cost of $2,378,650. Construction contract for channel rectification from Mykawa to Cullen, awarded April 1, 1999, continued through FY 00 at a cost of $6,588,011. A contract to repair damages from Reveille Park to Hemingway, awarded April 19, 1999, continued through FY 00 at a cost of $1,205,787. A construction contract for Channel rectification at Mouth to Port Terminal Railroad, Station 9+00 to 52+52 was awarded June 30, 2000. No cost was incurred for FY 00. Reimbursement was made to the Local Sponsor, Harris County Flood Control District, for their work on the reach from Port Terminal Railroad to Interstate Highway 45, in the amount of$300,000. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $149,391. Proiect Brays Bayou, TX Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point, TX Port Arthur, Hurricane Flood Protection, TX State Highway I 1 Bridge, TX Three Rivers, TX Clear Creek, TX - Second Outlet Galveston Groins, TX Date of Inspection December 1999 April 2000 February 2000 May 2000 May 2000 April 2000 August 2000 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: No initial coordination for Section 205 Flood Control activities were performed in FY 00. Construction of the flood protection project for Buffalo Bayou, Texas (Lynchburg Pump Station) is discussed in Section 22. A feasibility report for flood protection at Pin Oak Creek at Kirbyville, Texas, initiated in FY 99, completed in FY 00 at a fiscal year cost of $6,541. The study was terminated in FY 00 at the request of the sponsor. Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Disaster Preparedness cost for Fiscal Year 2000 was $315,081. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program fiscal year cost was $55,154. 29. EMERGENCY STREAM RANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: No new studies for stream bank and shoreline erosion activities were performed in FY 00. Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: No new feasibility studies of snagging and clearing activities for flood control improvements were performed in Fiscal Year 2000. 40-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Environmental Restoration 30. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications for improvement of environment activities pursuant to Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended: No coordination or initial appraisals were performed in FY 00. 31. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Coordination of Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration to improve the quality of the environment pursuant to section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Public Law 104-303, as amended: Fiscal year costs for coordination were $6,824. No initial appraisals were performed in FY 00. 32. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL Projects for beneficial uses of dredged material pursuant to Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, Public Law 102-560 are as follows: Planning and design analysis and environmental assessment for Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas Point National Wildlife Refuge, TX, are discussed in Section 33. 33. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY - TEXAS POINT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, TX Location. The project is located on the Texas Gulf Coast at the intersection of the Gulf shoreline and the West Jetty of the Sabine-Neches Waterway. The project is within the Texas Point National Wildlife Refuge, managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Jefferson County, Texas. Existing project. The project consist of pumping dredged material from the maintenance dredging of the Sabine Pass Channel onto the beach ridges adjacent to the West Jetty and within the Texas Point National Wildlife Refuge. Material placed in the marsh will fill subsided and eroded areas and enhance the restoration of the marsh. The material would also be available for transport into the marshes by storm-driven tidal surges. Once the material is there it would increase marsh elevations and provide nutrients for marsh plants. Any additional material will be placed in the surf zone shoreward of the ridge. This material will further stabilize the ridge and will provide increased storm protection for the marsh. By helping to mitigate the effects of subsidence and erosion, the restored wetlands will continue to provide feeding, nesting, and nursery habitat for a variety of waterfowl, water birds, and mammals that utilize the marshes. The protected marsh will continue to contribute to the productivity for fish and shellfish by providing a feeding and nursery area. Estimated cost for new work is $871,134 Federal (Corps) and $290,378 non-Federal consisting of lands, easements, relocations and rights-of-way in the amount of $2,875 and a cash contribution of $287,503. The construction costs represent the incremental difference between the base navigation condition and the costs associated with constructing the marsh restoration project. There are no operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement costs associated with the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The Texas General Land Office is the sponsor for the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed August 11, 2000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Initiated and completed the planning and design analysis and environmental assessment. A contract was awarded September 25, 2000, but no cost was incurred for Fiscal Year 2000. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for reconnaissance and feasibility studies were $1,364,505 for navigation and $43,372 for flood damage prevention. Reconnaissance and feasibility studies on watershed and ecosystems projects incurred costs of $12,296. A cost of $39,523 was incurred for a reconnaissance study for shoreline protection in FY 00. Reconnaissance and feasibility studies on review of authorized projects incurred costs of $2,541,476 for FY 2000. Miscellaneous Activities for FY 00 include the following: Special Investigations at a cost of $25,361; Interagency Water Resources Development at $14,573; National Estuary Program at $5,834; and North American Waterfowl Management Plan at a cost of $2,208. 35. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Cost for Coordination With Other Agencies waS $5,087 for FY 2000. 40-22 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Floodplain management, technical services and quick responses were performed at a cost of $50,002, $50,005, and $4,007, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $7,192. 37. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $6,945,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $696,154. South Main Channel, Texas - The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The authorized plan is currently being revised to reflect a smaller project and will include construction of new channels only in Willacy County, and a local protection project for Lyford, Texas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $8,710,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $1,053,167. Raymondville Drain, Texas - The project consist of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels, and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville, Texas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,343,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1997. Fiscal year costs were $113,158. Hunting Bayou, Texas - The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 ( PL 101-640). The authorized project provides for 14.3 miles of stream improvements, recreation trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station, access and parking areas. The Local Sponsor was authorized to design and construct an alternative to the project and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303). The project is currently being reformulated and will be identified by the General Reevaluation Study. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,070,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1998. Fiscal year costs were $74,635. North Padre Island, Texas - The project was authorized for ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction at North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, by the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (PL 106-53). The project will consist of a jettied channel from the Gulf of Mexico through Padre Island connecting with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at approximately mile 553; storm damage reduction measures on the north side of the area; and ecosystem restoration measures at various locations adjacent to the project area. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,800,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 2000. Fiscal year costs were $1,696,000. 40-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000$ 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 5. Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 6. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp 2 Cost 2 Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 6,319 27,305 ,691,260 ,664,921 31,000 4,784 2,259 - (107,300) 21,221 (71,340) 2,192,000 3,086,299 2,153,377 3,153,019 - 4,533,600' 9810 4,519,187' - 27,871,2022 - 27,871,2022 392,940 60,940,4753 391,064 60,937,8873 - 2,170,080 - 2,170,080 - 681,263' 681,263' (270) 8 603,430 - 603,358 159,600 4,224,576' 159,604 4,224,500' - 133,9256 - 133,9256 89,280 340,542 (3,957) 75,970 12,200 12,120 - 12,400 - 12,360 12,089 4,988,000 5,765,099 3,836,430 6,918,654 149,887 138,448 1,381,709' 138,498 1,381,679' S 66,934 66,934 (40) 549,599 549,599 - 77,474,639' - 77,472,463' 696,300 125,660,990' 694,812 125,657,5609 - 3,576,684 - 3,576,684 6,279,088 6,143,152 40-24 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 200029 7. Double Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Freeport Harbor, TX Minor Rehab: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost 433,050 431,188 154,569 131,000 2,564,804 2,503,579 4,620,841 4,587,072 - 15,774 134 17,502 - 226,558 - 226,558 -1,860,902 - 1,860,902 - (23,569) 4,052,000 4,263,253 40,000 55,290 233,325 233,325 20,000 64,781,95610 30,077 64,765,9721 3,630,000 4,647,783 4,947,000 84,724,039 2,342,847 5,970,636 4,946,198 84,722,3801" -- - 8,935 -- - 8,935 9. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 10. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) (Regular Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 4,263,430 Cost 4,246,903 Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. 12,270,830 Cost 12,332,656 New Work: Approp 8,558,000 Cost 8,649,381 Maint: Appr 24,577,401 Cost 24,582,562 Major Rehab: Approp. 250,000 Cost 415,369 Major Rehab: Approp. 250,000 Cost 467,140 Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost - 29,096,39212 29,096,39212 4,333,000 166,376 6,697,753 118,749,04713 4,319,309 194,590 6,698,589 118,746,51513 -- - 7,969,329 7,969,329 9,978,000 7,204,100 9,506,490 143,553,71714 8,097,000 8,907,151 9,609,040 143,253,237 '4 2,941,000 3,122,015 - (130,510) 28,634,490 26,540 384 28,634,490 27,841,900 28,308,062 28,670,518 489,681,327'" 26,035,524 30,264,184 28,634,639 489,581,47216 8,781 9,338 (40,300) (8,162) (40,300) (2,525) 3,390,338 3,390,338 2,955,700 2,955,700 835,873 835,873 40-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000' 11. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 13. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 14. Neches River Saltwater Barrier, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,725,000 1,654,890 540,853 20,000,000 44,201,800 38,003,700 121,248,300 2,753,710 32,002,467 67,341,990 121,054,644 - 19,960,000 19,100,000 40,080,000 234,666 9,651,362 26,939,013 37,586,330 - - - 35,760,382'7 - - - 35,760,382' 6,742,478 13,273,600 6,237,105 8,543,922 198,964,433"9 6,739,949 12,579,485 6,943,371 8,535,868 198,953,768 s .--- 18,058,77719 - - - 18,058,77719 1,406,029 1,400,113 502,000 481,833 2,757,000 2,563,618 1,409,404 66,713,02920 2,030,483 3,298,461 1,395,380 66,696,728" 1,450,000 2,307,000 1,715,000 7,821,843 1,455,003 2,322,312 1,452,433 7,558,974 800,000 195,260 11,594,320 11,587,144 800,000 195,260 - - - 56,136,815 - 56,136,81521 8,356,000 7,840,364 11,238,821 246,259,691" 7,940,843 8,272,907 11,232,884 246,249,24022 16. Texas City Channel, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost 25,000 24,922 (50,596) (52,144) 78 420,000 3,274,501 244,100 3,452,538 - 15,156,97223 - 15,156,972" 42,050 32,861,66624 42,040 32,861,65624 S 726,158 S 726,158 17. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 12,000,000 11,989,713 739,714 665,091 9,200,000 5,500,000 3,989,000 80,612,67625 8,902,679 4,730,564 4,789,998 80,042,81325 880,000 928,558 2,473,000 25,505,886~ 772,311 1,135,125 2,470,717 25,500,5692 40-26 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000" 20. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 21. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - (28,635) 1,493,500 1,481,133 174 2,835,440 2,825,098 - 2,120,641 - 2,120,641 - 2,009,710 - 2,009,710 3,420,310 5,796,200 5,520,000 79,587,27127 1,129,781 1,011,074 5,813,860 72,791,72227 - - - 377,804 - - - 377,797 5,115,500 2,007,741 1,985,927 45,257,223 4,604,711 2,589,876 1,930,374 45,180,317 22. Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg,IX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Clear Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Cypress Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 25. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 26. Sims Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 12,475,000 12,475,000 12,693,700 12,693,700 165,000 96,969 161 5,463,502 5,526,988 275,000 523,381 155,000 162,349 170,000 189,180 962,000 973,452 New Work: Approp. 13,026,290 Cost 12,855,241 New Work: Approp. 885,500 Cost 1,146,701 262,800 279,578 32,000 81,139 222 758,600 756,702 273,346 253,286 1,004,000 290,873 928,246 369,459 (-530) 220,000 221,524 82,935 788,300 22,976,036 118,772 22,289,214 - 1,315,000 - 1,234,382 85,000 3,832,000 86,676 39,350 6,127,100 2,334,426 - 835,000 65 835,000 850,600 740,800 1,192,000 8,206,463 865,066 743,917 1,166,325 8,180,290 11,409,000 8,846,127 11,410,000 9,552,099 9,504,001 12,294,414 755,860 200,000 550,000 398,575 484,385 510,799 82,202,417 81,666,287 5,291,36028 4,872,93628 40-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000" 33. SNWW- Texas Point Wildlife Refuge New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp.._. 875,000 875,000 Cost. - - - 121,970 121,970 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. - - Cost. - - - Excludes $1,637,270 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $10,571,509 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. Excludes $874,258 expended from contributed funds for dock removal for the local sponsor. 3 In addition, $1,352,092 expended from contributed funds and $34,000 expended from contributed funds for Port Isabel. In addition $621,723 expended from contributed funds from the City of South Padre Island for beneficial placement of dredged material on the South Padre Island Beach. 4 Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 6 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 8 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 9 Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $1,071,952 expended from contributed funds. 1 Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $20,811,568 expended from contributed funds. ($581,615 on 45-foot project.) " In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 1 Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 1 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,982,425 expended from contributed funds. 1 Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); Mouth of Colorado River ($3,397,080); ($1,275,097) Channel to Victoria; and ($862,716) expended for the local sponsor's levee requirement on Channel to Victoria. " Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 contributed funds for main channel and $336,450 contributed funds for Rollover Pass (beginning 1997). Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $16,883,455. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $4,181,780. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $8,452,983. Channel to Port Mansfield $9,044,003. Also includes $13,861,117 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded beginning in fiscal year 1992 and $28,140 contributed funds for Channel to Harlingen beginning in fiscal year 1998. 6 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds for main channel and $244,642 contributed funds for Rollover Pass (beginning 1997) for the beneficia placement of dredge material at Rollover Pass. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $16,882,704, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $4,169,123. In addition $1,515,574 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $8,449,348. Channel to Port Mansfield $9,039,335. Also includes an expended amount of $13,860,409 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded in fiscal year 1992. In addition, includes $28,140 contributed funds expended beginning il fiscal year 1998. 40-28 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT 1 Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 0 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds for Houston Ship Channel, of which $200,000 was for previous projects and $125,000 expended from contributed funds for Greens Bayou Channel. Includes appropriated funds for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $640,178. Barbour Terminal Channel $2,122,991. Bayport Ship Channel $10,400,665. Also, includes $91,942 contributed funds for Bayport Ship Channel beginning in FY 1998. Expenditures for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $637,217. Barbour Terminal Channel $2,121,705. Bayport Ship Channel $10,399,931. In addition $91,942 expended from contributed funds for Bayport Ship Channel beginning in FY 1998. 1 In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. D Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes an appropriation of $2,334,990 and expenditures of $2,334,990 for Channel to Red Bluff. Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 1 Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $5,938,115 expended from contributed funds and $7,944 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 11 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. Includes $195,083 for previous projects. * Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 1 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. Includes $6,719,813 appropriated (and $6,717,175 expended) for Wallisville Lake project beginning in FY 1983. 1 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. ' Excludes $2,001,295 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 29 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 40-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, TX Oct. 27, 1965 Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Nov. 17, 1986 Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jun. 3, 1930 Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Mar. 2, 1945 Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. H. Doc. 251, 89h Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Jul. 24, 1946 Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville H. Doc. 627, 79th channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950 Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Jul. 14, 1960 Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.2 7 Nov. 17, 1986 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 201, PL 99-662 40-30 1. 2. TABLE 40-B See Date Section Authorizing GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19303 Jul. 3, 1930 Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 40-31 - -i in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX Jul. 3, 1930 Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Houston Ship Channel to a S. Doc 107, 71st point on bayou 11 miles above mouth."9 Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Dec. 11, 2000 Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Houston Ship channel to a S. 349 (a)(2), PL 106- point on bayou 11 miles above mouth. 541 4. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX Jun. 25, 1910 A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Galveston H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., Harbor extending to a turning basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet 2nd Sess. deep. 30 Mar. 4, 1919 Enlargement, extension and protection of turning basin.30 H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 5. CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, TX Jun. 13, 1902 A channel 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide. H. Doc. 449, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Aug. 30, 1935 Enlargement of channel to 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide. H. Doc. 264, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Realignment, enlargement, and extension of channel to highway bridge H. Doc. 319, 77th near League City. Cong., Ist Sess.' 6. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Mar. 3, 1899 Acquisition of old curved portion of north jetty previously constructed Specified in Act. by private parties. Jun. 13, 1902 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Specified in Act. Mar. 3, 1905 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Specified in Act. Mar. 2, 1907 Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Rivers and Harbors ommiucen. :', REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19354 CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Committee Docs. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and H. Doc. 130, 72nd western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Cong., Ist Sess. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Aug 30, 1935 Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Jun. 20, 1938 Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Mar. 2, 1945 Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sep. 3, 1954 An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet H. Doc. 654, 81st long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Cong., 1st Sess. Sep. 3, 1954' Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. Sep. 3, 1954 An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400- foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., I st Sess. 40-32 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 30, 1948 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Jul. 3, 1958 Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Jul. 3, 1958 Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Sec. 107, PL-86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Oct. 22, 1976 Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. Sep. 15, 1994 Assume maintenance of 17 foot by 100 foot Jewel Fulton Canal, after construction by local interest. Sec. 124, PL 94-587 Sec. 204, PL 99-662 as amended DOUBLE BAYOU, TX. Mar. 3, 1899 A channel 6-feet deep and 100-feet wide through the bar at mouth of H. Doc. 387, 55th Double Bayou. Cong., 2nd Sess. Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Oct. 25, 1965) 7-foot by 125-foot channel from the 7-foot depth in Trinity Bay to the intersection of Double Bayou Channel with the channel to Liberty; and thence a 7- by 100-foot channel upstream for 2.0 miles. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Mar. 3, 1899 Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Mar. 2, 1907 Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Sec. 107, PL 86-646 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-33 7. 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents FREEPORT HARBOR, TX (continued) Feb. 27, 1911 Repairs to jetties and dredging. Mar. 4, 1913 Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Aug. 8, 1917 Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Mar. 3, 19256 Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Jul. 3, 1930 Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Oct. 5, 1961 Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Sec. 101, PL 99-6 62 40-34 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 131 1. Jun. 13, 1902 A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner H.Doc. 264, 56th bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.' Cong., 2nd Sess. Mar. 3, 1905 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Mar. 2, 1907 Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Mar. 2, 19079 Jun. 25, 19109 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30H. Doc. 768, 59th feet and width of 700 feet. Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., Cong., 2nd Sess 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Jul. 27, 1916 Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to H. Doc. 1390, 62nd vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Cong., 3rd Sess. Jul. 18, 1918 Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Sep. 22, 1922 Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Jan. 21, 1927" Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.' Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by River and Harbors 100 feet. 72ndCommittee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Apr. 4, 1938 Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-35 9. Aug. 5, 1886 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX (continued) Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Dredge to a depth of 42 feet over the authorized width of 800 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to a point 2 miles west of the seawall and of the North jetty thence at a depth of 40 feet to the junction of the Houston Ship Channel, with widths of 800 feet to Bolivar Roads, thence decreasing to 400 feet at the junction with the Houston Ship Channel. Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res.) Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., I st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 9 2 "d Cong Oct. 12, 1996 Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. Sec. 101 (30) The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the PL 104-303 Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial water bird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. The project is referred to as Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Mar. 3, 1925 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Jan. 21, 1927 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda H. Doc. 564, 75th Bays. Cong., 3rd Sess. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and H. Doc. 64 1, 75th improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Cong., 3rd Sess. 40-36 10. GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (continued) Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from H. Doc. 230, 76th Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Cong., 1st Sess. Jul. 23, 1942 Construct waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. PL 675, 77th Cong. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near H. Doc. 337, 76th Liverpool. Cong., Ist Sess. Mar. 2, 19459 Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port H. Doc. 428, 76th O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Cong., Ist Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a H. Doc. 383, 77th depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Cong., Ist Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, S. Doc 248, 78th with basin. Cong., 2nd Sess. Mar. 2, 1945"14 Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of H. Doc. 402, 77th Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) Jul. 24, 1946 Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning H. Doc. 627, 79th Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main Cong., 2nd Sess. channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Jul. 24, 1946 Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas H. Doc. 700, 79th Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Cong., 2nd Sess. Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. May 17, 1950 Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized H. Doc. 768, 80 th Cong., the 4 by 100-foot channel. May 17, 1950 Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and H. Do. 196, 81st Cong., Galveston causeway. May 17, 1950 "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." PL 516, 81st Cong. Jul. 12, 1952 Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet PL 527, 82nd Cong., from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles 2nd Sess. above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Sep. 3, 1954"5 Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance H. Doc. 478, 81st channel 9 by 100 feet. Sep. 3, 1954 Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, H. Doc. 376, 83rd to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Cong., 2nd Sess. Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. 40-37 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (continued) Sep. 9, 1959 Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Jul. 14, 1960 Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 196517 S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing Sec. 107, PL 86-645 the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend Sec. 107, PL 86-645 southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River H. Doc. 556, 87th to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel Cong., 2nd Sess. in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective H. Doc. 504, 87th breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, Cong., 2" Sess. enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 H. Doc. 288, 87th turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Cong., 2nd Sess. Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel H. Doc. 217, 89th extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay Cong., 1st Sess. and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). 40-38 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (continued) Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Oct. 31, 1992 Provide 8 miles of erosion protection for the existing waterway in the Sec. 101 (20), vicinity of Sargent, Texas. PL 102-580 Oct. 12, 1996 Provides for erosion protection along a 31-mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which crosses the critical wintering habitat of the endangered whooping crane, including a 13.25 mile reach within the boundary of the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. Also, provides for limited oil spill containment features and equipment to protect those areas from accidental hazardous spills. HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX Oct. 12, 1996 Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial water bird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. Oct. 27, 2000 Provides for barge lanes immediately adjacent to either side of the Houston Ship Channel, from Bolivar roads to Morgan Point, to a depth of 12 feet. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Mar. 5, 1905 Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.' s Mar. 2, 1919 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. Mar. 3, 1925 A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou.' 9 Jul. 3, 1930 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Sec. 101 (29), PL 104-303 Sec. 101 (29) PL 104-303 Appendix B, PL 106-377 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., IstSess. 40-39 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 11. 12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX (continued) Aug. 30, 19351" Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Mar 2, 1945 Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning H. Doc. 737, 79th basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Cong., 2nd Sess. Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Jul. 3, 195820 Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Jul. 14, 1960 Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Oct. 27, 1965H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Nov. 17, 1986 Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.2' Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85"t Cong., 2nd Sess.I Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 Oct. 12, 1996 Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. Sec. 101 (30) The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the PL 104-303 Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial water bird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. The project is referred to as Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Jun. 25, 1910 Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Aug. 30, 1935 Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess' 40-40 13. GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX (continued) Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca H. Doc. 314, 76th and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. Cong., Ist Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel H. Doc. 731, 79th 100 feet wide and equal depth. Cong., 2nd Sess. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. Jul. 3, 1958 An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARRIER AT BEAUMONT, TX Oct. 22, 1976 Construct gated salt water barrier in Neches River consisting of seven 40 x 24.5 foot tainter gates; gated navigation by-pass channel with clear opening of 56 feet and depth of 16 feet; access road and levee; and auxiliary dam across canal which drains adjacent bayou. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX. Jul. 25, 1912 Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 102, PL 94-587 H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. Sep. 22, 1922 Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased H. Doc. 975, 66th widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Cong., 3rd Sess. Sep. 22, 1922 Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Mar. 3, 1925 Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Jan. 21, 1927 Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine- Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Aug. 30, 193511 A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., I st Sess. 40-41 Aug. 26, 1937 14. 15. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935"11 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX (continued) Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of S. Doc 158, 77th Pennsylvania Shipyard. Cong. 2nd Sess. Jul. 24, 194623 Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Jul. 24, 194624 Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Jul. 24, 1946 Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-42 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX (continued) May 17, 1950 Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine- Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Mar. 4, 1913 A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north H. Doc. 1390, 62nd to channel. Cong., 3rd Sess. Jul. 3, 1930 A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound H. Doc. 107, 71st dike. Cong., Ist Sess. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Aug. 26, 1937 Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2rd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 40-43 Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 16. Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX (continued) Jul. 14, 1960 Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot H. Doc. 427, 86th Industrial Barge Canal. Cong., 2nd Sess. Oct. 12, 1972 Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation Senate Res.) of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at Oct. 12, 1972 the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet (House Res.) wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. Nov. 17, 1986 17. Jun. 18, 1878 1889 Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Dredging of a channel through the bar at the mouth of the Trinity River. Modified to include two parallel jetties 275 feet apart, the westerly one of length 7,359 feet and the other of length 300 feet. Jun. 13, 1902 Improvement of the Trinity River in the interest of providing navigation (As amended from the mouth of the Trinity River to Dallas. The plan provided for Mar. 3, 1905, the construction of 37 locks and dams, with auxiliary dredging and Mar. 2, 1907, other open-channel work necessary to obtain a 6-foot depth for Jun. 25, 1910, continuous navigation (excepting periods of excessive drought). Jul. 25, 1912, Each Act also authorized the construction of certain-named locks and Mar. 4, 1913, dams. and Jul. 27, 1916) Mar. 3, 1905 Authorized the Anahuac Channel. No project dimensions were specified by the Act, so a 7- by 8-foot channel, 12,238 feet long was dredged in 1905. H. Doc. 199, 92" Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 409, 56th Cong., 1 Sess. Specified in Act. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements H. Doc. 989 66" by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Cong., 3rd Sess Mar. 2, 1945 Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Jul. 24, 1946 Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200- foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-44 Sep. 22, 1922 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX (continued) Oct. 23, 1962 Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Oct. 27, 1965 Reevaluation of navigation benefits. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Jul. 30, 1983 Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and PL 98-63 confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. 20. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Jun. 20, 1938 Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. H. Doc. 415, 91" Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sep. 3, 1954 Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and H. Doc. 250, 83rd White Oak Bayous. Cong., 2nd Sess.' Oct. 27, 1965 Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Nov. 28, 1990 Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat launching ramps, 10 restrooms, playgrounds, exercise stations and parking facilities. Oct. 12, 1996 Authorizes non-Federal interests to undertake flood control projects in the United States, subject to obtaining any permits required pursuant to Federal and State laws in advance of actual construction. For the purpose of demonstrating the potential advantages and effectiveness of non-Federal implementation of flood control projects, the Secretary shall enter into agreements pursuant to this section with non-Federal interests for development of the following Buffalo Bayou projects: Brays Bayou, Hunting Bayou, and White Oak Bayou. H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 101, PL 101-640 Sec. 211, PL 104-303 40-45 21. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES (continued) Oct. 12, 1996 The non-Federal interest for the Buffalo Bayou and tributaries authorized Sec 350, PL 104-303 flood control projects, may be reimbursed by up to $5,000,000 or may receive a credit of up to $5,000,000 toward required non-Federal project cost-sharing contributions for work performed by the non- Federal interest at each of the following locations if such work is compatible with 1 or more of the following authorized projects: White Oak Bayou, Brays Bayou, Hunting Bayou, Garners Bayou (not authorized), and the Upper Reach of Greens Bayou. During any evaluation of economic benefits and costs that occurs after October 12, 1996, the Secretary shall not consider flood control works constructed by non-Federal interests within the drainage area of such projects prior to the date of such evaluation in the determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the following authorized projects: Buffalo Bayou Basin, Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries (Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous), and Cypress Creek. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34 .8.28 Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development Modified the project to authorize a nonstructural flood control project. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. Modified the project to authorize a nonstructural flood control project. SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. Amended the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorization as project cost estimate had exceeded limit established in Section 902 of WRDA 1986. Sec. 575, PL 104-303 H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 355(a), PL 106-53 Sec 401, PL 99-662 Sec. 355(a), PL 106-53 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 Sec. 103, PL 101-101 1 Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. (1975 Deauthorization list) Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. 40-46 Oct. 12, 1996 23. 24. 25. 26. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 17, 1999 Nov 17, 1986 Aug. 17, 1999 Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 29, 1989 -- GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT s West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. 7 Dredging upper 1.3 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. (1975 Deauthorization list) * Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 1 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 10 Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 11 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13 Dredging upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 1 Inactive. 6 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1986 Deauthorization list) " The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 11 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 19 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip (mile 47) to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1985 Deauthorization list) 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1975 Deauthorization list) 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. (1985 Deauthorization list) 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 28 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 29 Cedar Bayou, miles 3 to 11 were deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251 and were re-authorized under Sec. 349(a)(2), PL 106-541. 30 Channel to Port Bolivar turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 40-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 2000 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts) Bastrop Bayou, TX2 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula Dickinson Bayou, TX East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX3 Greens Bayou Bridges, TX Johnson Bayou, LA4 Little Bay, TXS Oyster Creek, TX I Exc~xes $1,672 wck coniLxfion. 2 Widening from 60 ft to 100 fiet at 4-foat was deathriz der Sec. 12 ofPL 93-251. Ih3a ficSPglyfora 1967 1931 1968 1954 1922 1993 1933 1979 1922 38,252 9,920 1,194,344 33,942 2,476 450,000 2,261 6,942 27,129 26,467 57,553 847 54,042 252,728 7,556 4 Channeque af oirexgc nacMe. 5 ArsanCutyNa4igom Diic RodqxtTX crsmucted projt as athorid by 1950 Riverad HaxrAct(R Dc 114, 81st Cong, 1st Sess) in 1955 under Deprmat ofAnny pen 40-48 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 2000 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX' 1986 201,300 Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point, TX2 1996 473,8009 Colorado River, Matagorda, TX' 1963 273,757 Falfurrias, TX' 1995 103,454 Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1984 29,285,0423 Guadalupe River at Victoria, TX2 1996 532,18710 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), TX2 1978 505,749 Highland Bayou, TX'3 1984 12,254,390 Kirbyville, TX2 1993 1,484,6134 Lavaca-Navidad River, TX: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 Port Arthur and Vicinity Hurricane-Flood Protection, TX2 1997 61,400,2921" San Diego Creek, Alice, TX2 1963 135,175 State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX2 1995 214,155' Taylors Bayou, TX2 1997 37,413,20912 Texas City and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1993 38,882,4007 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX' 1956 130,239 Three Rivers, TXS 6 5,835,927' Upper White Oak Bayou, TX2 1989 972,300 U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, LA2 1993 500,0008 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX 2 1993 19,307,100 In adition, $8,695,438 expended fm contrixuted funds, 1,126905 e~tined value of comnbuted lan, and $2,726,446 for *elocatiomlobcyal intenss. ' In addition, $1,484,613 expeded fcm conibted fich, efa value of $200,096 for conmuited lndS and 202456 for *Cad=by localinests* 3 In addi n, $71370 expmded fm contributed finds. 6 SeeA na Repart for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16- SIn additin, $14396307 expended fncon uted fids, r l vaue of$1,224,2 19 fr conibuted lands, and contnbuted work int he maont of $1,070,806 by local iktess. Work perfmne d at 100/o Local Spnsor expense was in the amxn of$320347. S In addition, $237,792 expa ded fm cntxilted fi~nd. 9 In addition $92920 epended fm uncibtaed ffund o In aMdition $480,888 expended fiom conOlted findc " Inadditian,$16,976,675expendedfromoatIxtedfuds u In additio$12340,997 fpencdr1efdb fmed fu t Canpleted. Lower8.6 milesofadl el recificaion on Highnd Bayu wasc x April 5,1999. 40-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 2000 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX ' 1998 225,4402 Salt Bayou, McFadden Ranch, TX' 1997 1,754,0003 ' noied 2 In addit $75,146expde rm contbated fixis SIn additin,$57677 exmded fimcaibted fiundsd an estid va ofotibued lands in the amout of$8,000. 40-50 TABLE 40-F Project Baytown Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington Corpus Christi Ship Ch - 1913 Act Jetty GIWW, Harbor Refuge at Seadrift Liberty Local Protection Project, TX Mill Creek Brazos River, Austin Co. 1946 Act Navidad & Lavaca Rivers, Jackson and Lavaca Counties- General Channel Project Peyton Creek, TX Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff) 1978 1971 1952 1952 1975 1971 DISTRICT ZED PROJECTS GALVESTON, TX, DEAUTHORI For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1980 1924 1W udim$123,676 forpeviospojecs. 40-51 Federal Funds Expended 245,000 216,9891 Contributed Funds Expended 223,010 Date And Authority Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 17 Nov 1986 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 19 Jul 1992 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 19 Jul 1992 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 17 Nov 1986 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 1 Jan 1990 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 1 Jan 1990 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 17 Nov 1986 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 17 Nov 1986 79,041 98,517 24,753 21,086 66,377 -- - I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS ee Total Cost ection to a Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 2000 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 6. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 8 Freeport Harbor, TX 9. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 10. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 11. Houston Ship Channel, TX 15. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project Regular Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Inland WW. Trust Fund Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project TABLE 40-G SI SI IF 24,346,787 2,848,560 10,571,509 37,766,856 2,170,080 00 2,170,080 642,176 0 642,176 85,214 85,214 75,775,642 324,287 6,143,152 82,243,849 1,716,695 276,720 84,237,264 64,502,299 116,575 20,811,568 85,425,873 360,249 85,786,122 11,920,187 8,754,209 0 3,648,932 24,323,328 142,080,051 466,477 28,634,490 5,774,661 176.955,679 395,000 139,776 177,490,455 29,042,93 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 60,937,887 0 1,352,092 62,289,979 4,154,716 0 4,154,716 1,335,578 1,335,578 125,595,108 0 1,071,952 126,667,060 00 126,667,060 84,722,379 0 229,311 84,951,690 0 84,951,690 118,135,105 512,163 13,121 2,982,425 121,642,814 488,054,908 00 1,811,028 489,865,936 0 0 489,865,936 182,261,387 15,479,239 551,583 198,292,209 243,869,563 0 5,938,114 249,807,677 0 0 249,807,677 0 0 0 0 0 3,576,684 00 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 8,935 00 8,935 0 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 00 7,969,329 3,390,338 0 2,955,700 0 6,346,038 00 6,346,038 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 o o 87,454,754 2,848,560 11,923,601 102,226,915 4,796,892 0 4,796,892 1,420,792 1,420,792 204,947,434 324,287 7,215,104 212,487,593 1,716,695 276,720 214,481,008 149,233,613 116,575 21,040,879 170,386,498 360,249 170,746,747 137,428,648 9,862,345 13,121 6,631,357 153,935,471 633,525,297 466,477 31,590,190 7,585,689 673,167,653 395,000 139,776 673,702,429 211,303,680 18,092,171 1,934,343 231,330,194 293,461,894 1,363,652 8,041,549 302,867,095 32,000 116,760 303,015,855 40-52 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-G TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 2000 16. Texas City Channel, TX Regular 14,653,853 32,666,573 726,158 48,046,584 Public Works 136,296 0 0 136,296 Contributed 1,023,819 0 0 1,023,819 Total cost of project 15,813,968 32,666,573 726,158 49,206,699 17. Trinity River and Regular 78,076,507 24,956,907 0 103,033,414 Tributaries, TX Contributed 66,000 0 0 66,000 Total cost of project 78,142,507 24,956,907 0 103,099,414 40-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below Bottom (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Width Mean Low Width Length In Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel 3. Cedar Bayou, Houston Ship Channel to Bayou TX Mile 3.0 Bayou Mile 3.0 to Mile I1 .07 4. Channel to Port Bolivar Channel Port Bolivar, TX Turning Basin 5. Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX Galveston Bay to Clear Creek North Fork Channel Channel through Clear Creek and Clear Lake 44 42 42 400 250 250 42 300 42 325 36 1,200 36 200 36 200 36 200-1,000 15 15 15 15 15 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 10 100 10 100 30 200 30 750' 75 60 60 44 42 42 42 42 36 36 400 250 250 300 375 660-1,200 200 36 200 36 200-1,000 15 15 15 15 15 10 30 14 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 100 200 200 75 60 60 40-54 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 1,200 1,470 1,230 770 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 5.7 900 0.2 1.5 0.7 7.7 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below Bottom (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Width Mean Low Width Length In Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 6. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4001 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,2005 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,250' 100 200 150 150 47 45 45 12 12 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 12 300-400 45 600-500 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,050' 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,250' 100 200 150 7. Double Double Bayou Channel: Bayou, TX Mouth to 7-foot contour ini Trinity Bay West Fork 125 100 125 - 3.9 100 - 2.0 Outer Bar Channel Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 400 400 750 400 1,0004 285-375 1,2004 200 500 200 36 7504 47 45 300 200 45 390 45 1000 45 285-375 45 12004 30 200 25 500 30 200 30 7504 40-55 1.8 1.0 0.1 1,550 200 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,5I0 0.2 1,690 1,000 1,000 800 0.6 0.3 3.1 0.2 1.8 0.2 5.6 0.1 1,250 0.2 - 0.8 400 0.1 - 0.8 8. Freeport Harbor, TX - 3.0 - 0.8 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 800 0.1 500 1.1 0.1 05 675 0.1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below Bottom (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Width Mean Low Width Length In Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. 12. Houston Ship Bolivar Roads to Morgan Channel, TX Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 13. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff 52 52 50 36 50 800 800 800 2,875' 800 40 1,125 40 40 40 40 40 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 8009 40 40 300 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 40 175 15 100 38 300 36 300-2006 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 948-1,0009 965-1,0709 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 4.7 1.7 3.2 1.8' 1.0 - 3.9 26.2 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 1,592 - 0.6 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 0.2 - 0.9 - 3.1 2,000 0.4 - 3.8 1,000 0.3 1.9 60 - 4.1 60 0.8 175 - 0.3 100 1.3 38 300 36 300-2006 36 200-300 36 1,000 12 125 12 27-340 12 125 12 300 12 250 6 100 1,000 532 1,682 1,750 40-56 9. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 3.2 20.9 1.1 0.2 4.1 0.1 1.9 0.3 0.3 20.2 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below Bottom (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Width Mean Low Width Length In Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 15. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 16. Texas City Channel, TX 42 800 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 40 600 40 200-250 40 150-1,000 40 400 40 9004 Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Extension Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. Orange Turning Basin Orange Municipal Slip Old Channel Around Harbor Island Channel to Echo7 Adams Bayou Cow Bayou Orangefield Turning Basin Texas City Channel Turning Basin Industrial Barge Canal:'o Channel from Texas City Turning Basin to Mile 1.7 Turning Basin 400 1,0004 1,0004 1,000, 350 Irregular 500 350 200 200 200 Irregular 200 150-200 125 100 100 300 600 1,000-1,200 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 40 370-547 40 350-550 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - 5.6 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 40 200-250 0.6 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 12 13 13 40 40 400 9004 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 Irregular 160-535 300 200 200 200 Irregular 150-200 150-200 100 100 300 400 1,000 - 11.2 -8 700 930 1,530 1,265 1,30 1,5( 18.3 0.2 )0 0.2 10 0.3 - 0.4 0.7 - 4.4 9.5 1,550 0.3 2,435 0.5 2.4 1.7 7.0 500 0.1 - 6.8 4,253 .8 40 300-400 40 1,000 40-57 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 12 12 13 13 50 50 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-H CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below Bottom (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Width Mean Low Width Length In Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 17.. Trinity River Multiple Purpose Channel Channel, TX to Fort Worth" 12 200 - - - Channel to Liberty" 9 150 6 100 - 41.4 Anahuac Channel 6 100 6 100 5.8 _...Ch.n.neldrdge^3.fet.eeptebey...- Average. Includes 100-foot channel width. Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. Diameter. Includes 350-foot channel width. 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. Deauthorized. Included in channel length. Includes 300-foot channel width. 1 Channel dredged 34 feet deep by 250-200 tfeet wide by 9,908 feet long and basin 34 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide by 1,150 feet long by local interests. I Not constructed. '2 9-foot by 150-foot channel completed from Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, a distance of 23 miles. Upper end not connected to river channel to prevent salt intrusion into river. River channel maintained at 6 by 100-foot from mouth to Liberty, Texas. 40-58 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-I GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FL. TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet (Below Bottom (Below Bottom Mean Low Width Mean Low Width Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout 2 West Turnout 3 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel 6 Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. I Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield 0 Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Taguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout 12 12 12 12 9 9 9 9 9 9 15-12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 100-200-300 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 125 6 0 0 (AVG) 125 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 12 12 12 12 9 9 9 9 15-20 12 12 12 12 12 9 12 999 9 9 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 100-200-300 125 200 300 130-400 125 50OOAVG) 125 100 200 100 200 342AvoG) 125-175 300 0.2 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 2,200 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 34.8 0.1 0.8 2.0 0.5 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.4 0.3 500 635 1,130 800AVG) 230 1,225 2,212 125 1,800 - 0.8 - 0.4 300 0.1 - 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 40-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-I GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FL. TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS , PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet (Below Bottom (Below Bottom Mean Low Width Mean Low Width Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to ApproachChannel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW Turning Basin near Rio Hondo North Turnout from Main Channel Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel Main Channel South Leg Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel Main Channel South Leg Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel Harbor Channel Boat Basin 14 12 12 14 14 14 100 200 200 125 200 400 14 1,000 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 766 160 350 125 400 200 125 233-60 125 125 233-60 125 75 50 Variable 14 12 12 14 14 14 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,250 14 1,000 8 160 12 350 12 1251" 12 400 12 200 12 125-90 12 233-60 12 125 12 125-90 12 233-60 12 125 7 75 6 50 6 72-501 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. s Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf, which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7 Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 'o Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 fee long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) i South turnout is 200 feet wide. "Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized 40-60 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 25.811 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.2 580 860 1,450 500 1,308 I GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-J DREDGING OPERATIONS Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brownsville Ship Channel Port Isabel Channel and Turning Basin August 23, 2000 to September 30, 2000 0 $50,000 Cedar Bayou, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Cedar . Bayou October I, 1999 to January 20, 2000 0 $141,582 Channel to Bolivar (Maintenance) Dredging GIWW, High Island to Bolivar October 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000 89,544 $138,498 Corpus Christ Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging LaQuinta Channel and Turning Basin September 15, 2000 to September 30, 2000 0 $50,000 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Freeport Entrance Channel October 1, 1999 to December 11, 1999 1,555,615 $2,302,702 Dredging Entrance, Jetty and Inside Channels and Coast Guard Basin July 20, 2000 to September 21, 2000 1,867,570 $2,239,960 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Bolivar Roads to Pier B, COE Boat Basin, US Coast Guard Docking Facilities February 28, 2000 to September 13, 2000 4,368,841 $3,370,650 Dredging Jetty & Entrance Channel (O&M Galveston Portion) October 1, 1999 to July 20, 2000 1,101,252 $2,973,379 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX (New Work) Dredging Channel to Victoria Stations 835+00 to 1300+00 October 1, 1999 to August 20, 2000 1,170,090 $3,858,122 Dredging Channel to Victoria Stations 1300+00 to 1841+21 September 29, 2000 to September 30, 2000 0 $0 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX Main Channel (Maintenance) Dredging Boggy Bayou to Colorado River October 1, 1999 to October 19, 1999 119,392 $30,000 Dredging Turnstake Island to Rattlesnake Island October 1, 1999 to October 12, 1999 910,021 $266,400 Dredging Colorado River to Matagorda Bay October 1, 1999 to July 21, 2000 3,142,085 $4,989,119 Dredging High Island to Port Bolivar October 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000 972,771 $2,718,876 Dredging Port O'Connor to San Antonio Bay October 14, 1999 to June 8, 2000 823,009 $1,595,934 Dredging GIWW, Main Channel in Matagorda Bay October 27, 1999 to April 6, 2000 322,363 $1,533,165 Dredging Baffin Bay through Mud Flats December 27, 1999 to March 20, 2000 958,217 $1,120,724 Dredging Port Mansfield to Mud Flats January 14, 2000 to April 10, 2000 2,104,117 $1,956,935 40-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 40-J DREDGING OPERATIONS Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX Main Channel Dredging (Maintenance) Galveston Causeway to Bastrop Bayou August 16, 2000 to September 30, 2000 353,315 $768,316 Chocolate Bayou (Maintenance) Dredging Chocolate Bayou October 1, 1999 to October 12, 1999 1,053,072 $832,860 Channel to Harlingen (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Harlingen May 9, 2000 to September 20, 2000 533,363 $1,622,750 Channel to Port Mansfield (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Port Mansfield May 9, 2000 to September 20, 2000 392,763 $482,508 Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Boggy Bayou to Colorado River October 1, 1999 to October 19, 1999 114,428 $235,722 Dredging Mouth of Colorado River, Navigation Channel and Impoundment Basin March 13, 2000 to September 30, 2000 701,967 $2,027,247 Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX (New Work) Dredging Lower Bay October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000 6,041,007 $23,713,786 Dredging Upper Bayou October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000 1,518,758 $3,551,584 Dredging Jetty and Entrance Channel October 1, 1999 to July 20, 2000 6,345,257 $17,380,523 Dredging Upper Bay February 2, 2000 to September 30, 2000 4,532,096 $8,582,768 Dredging Lower Bayou April 28, 2000 to September 30, 2000 1,234,585 $3,869,451 Houston Ship Channel (Maintenance) Dredging Lower Bay (O&M portion) October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000 414,173 $1,780,947 Dredging Upper Bayou (O&M portion) October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000 95,238 $200,000 Dredging Sims to Greens Bayou With Extension to Boggy Bayou October 1, 1999 to July 27, 2000 723,313 $1,087,794 Dredging Upper Bay (O&M portion) February 2, 2000 to September 30, 2000 50,000 $106,000 Dredging Lower Bayou (O&M portion) April 28, 2000 to September 30, 2000 96,618 $200,000 Dredging Houston Ship Channel, Sims Bayou to Main Turning Basin And Light Draft Channel July 19, 2000 to September 30, 2000 270,250 $1,000,000 Bayport Ship Channel (Maintenance) Dredging Upper Bay (O&M Bayport portion) February 2, 2000 to September 30, 2000 476,629 $713,001 40-62 GALVESTON, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 40-J DREDGING OPERATIONS Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging GIWW, Main Channel in Matagorda Bay October 27, 1999 to April 6, 2000 122,609 $220,796 Dredging Matagorda Ship Channel to Port Lavaca and Harbor of Refuge January 10, 2000 to April 6, 2000 1,281,498 $631,330 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Port Arthur Canal, Junction Area, and Turning Basin October 1, 1999 to December 22, 1999 1,644,446 $1,211,376 Dredging Neches River Lower Reach in Orange and Jefferson Counties October 1, 1999 to April 28, 2000 1,912,999 $2,129,280 Dredging Sabine Pass, Outer Bar and Bank Channel December 15, 1999 to May 2, 2000 4,782,702 $3,913,359 Emergency Dredging Sabine Neches Waterway, Neches Canal Sec. B And Sabine River Channel August 25, 2000 to September 30, 2000 98,324 $716,546 Dredging Sabine Neches Waterway, Sabine Pass Jetty Channel September 25, 2000 to September 30, 2000 0 $50,000 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Anahuac and Channel to Trinity August 30, 2000 to September 30, 2000 35,100 $1,254,460 40-63 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG Phillip R. Anderson, President, Nov. 1999; Mr. Sam E. Angel, member, Nov. 1999; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. William Clifford Smith, appointed Oct. 22, 1998; BG Carl Strock, Commander Northwestern Division, member designee; BG Robert H. Griffin, Commander, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division, appointed Nov 1999; RADM Nicholas Prahl, NOAA, member designee; and COL William David Brown served as Secretary of the Commission, retired Jun. 2000. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of Unprovements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized Operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefore. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of three salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement, two in lower Mississippi River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi- Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Authorizing legislation (Tables 41 -D and 41 -E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced Stext and also appear at the end of the chapter. 41-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L-Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Whiteman's Creek Ten Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, and vicinity Arkansas; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor improvements to Helena Harbor and vicinity, Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel improvements and pumping station for Helena, Phillips County,and vicinity, Arkansas and St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944 Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realignment and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 41-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 41-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 41-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 41-D and 4 1-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 41-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Through Sep. 30, 2000, physical completion of the entire project is 87.1 percent. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1990, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1990, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (59th edition), 1992. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 2000, was $6,908,830,977 (See Table 41-V.) (See also Tables 41-U, 41-W, and 41-X for additional financial statements. The 356th Session was held on Dec. 6, 1999, at the Mississippi River Commission in Vicksburg, MS. Approximately 15 people were in attendance. The Conmmnission considered the final Feasibility Report on Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee and Kentucky. The 357th Session was held on Apr. 10-14, 2000, on board the Motor Vessel Mississippi enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cape Girardeau, MO; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and New Orleans, LA, with approximately 415 people in attendance. This session was adjourned in New Orleans, LA, Apr. 14, 2000. The 358th Session was held Aug. 14-25, 2000, on board the Motor Vessel Mississippi. Public meetings were held at Wabasha, MN; Burlington, IA; St. Louis, MO; Tiptonville, TN; West Memphis, AR; Natchez, MS; and Morgan City, LA, with approximately 725 people in attendance. This session adjourned Aug. 25, 2000, in Morgan City, LA. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1999, 4th edition of the folio of navigation maps (Scale 1:24,000) covering the Atchafalaya River system and outlets to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed in FY 99. Approximately 210 flight-line miles of blackand- white aerial photography (various scales); 11,028 flight-line miles of color true photography; and about 34 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District: The conversion of 1:62,500 scale quadrangle maps Southwest Pass, West Delta, East Delta, Venice, Breton Island, and Empire from manual to digital form were completed in FY 00. Memphis District-Series conversion U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale 1:62,500-scale quads of New Madrid, Portageville, MO were published in FY 1999. of to MO; 41-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Vicksburg District-Series Published 1:62,500 scale quadrangle maps Lake Providence, LAMS and Alsatia, LA-MS was completed in FY 00. Revision of Vicksburg, MS, LA is in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 49.4 feet at Cairo gage on Feb. 29, 2000, and maximum discharge of 732,000 cubic feet per second occurred at Hickman, KY on Feb. 29, 2000, a crest stage of 21.2 feet at Memphis on Mar. 1-2, 2000, and a maximum discharge of 747,000 cubic feet per second at Memphis on Mar. 1-2, 2000. Vicksburg District-The Mississippi River in the Vicksburg District - Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg District's reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City, 23.8 feet on Mar. 4, 2000, and maximum discharge of 800,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 29.3 feet on Mar. 6, 2000, and a maximum discharge of 825,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez, 35.3 feet on Mar. 6, 2000, and maximum discharge of 775,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 39.4 feet NGVD on Apr. 18, 2000, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 8.4 feet NGVD on Apr. 20, 2000. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 25.6 feet NGVD on Apr. 17, 2000. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. A July 1997 resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the U.S. House of Representatives authorized a study of flooding and other problems in the area west of the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alexandria, Louisiana, and the Gulf of Mexico. A reconnaissance study was initiated in FY 1998 and completed in FY 1999. A May 1998 resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the U.S. House of Representatives authorized a study of flooding and other problems in the area between Bayou Lafourche and the Mississippi River from Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico. A reconnaissance study was initiated in FY 1999. An April 1992 resolution of the Public Works and Transportation of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee authorized a study of flooding and other problems east of the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Morganza, Louisiana, and the Gulf of Mexico. A feasibility study was continued in FY 1999. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1995 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 directed an expedited study of a lock the Houma Navigation Canal under the authority of the Morganza, Louisiana, and the Gulf of Mexico study. An interim feasibility study on the lock was completed in FY 1997 and was approved for preconstruction engineering and design in FY 1999. A May 1998 resolution of the committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the U.S. House of Representatives authorized a study of flooding and other problems in the area between Bayou Lafourche and the Mississippi River, from Donaldsonville to the Gulf of Mexico. A reconnaissance study was initiated in FY 99. A June 1998 resolution of the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the U.S. Senate authorized a study of the multipurpose flood control and agricultural water supply problems in the Boeuf- Tensas Basin of southeast Arkansas. A feasibility study was initiated in FY 2000. Mississippi River and Tributaries Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 41-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Continued construction of levees in the Main Stem System. Vicksburg District--Continued construction of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-L. Memphis District-Continued construction of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 41-K, 41-L, 41-M, and 41-N.) There are 1,609.8 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,603.0 are in place with 1,3493 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,215.7 miles, of which 41-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 2,196.8 are in place with 1,881.4 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are 85.4 miles of levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River miles (all completed); 59.2 along the south bank of Red River (all completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 miles in place and 387.5 miles completed to grade and section (see Table 41-N). Of the authorized 677.8 miles of berms and seepage control measures, 558.3 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 2,094.8 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,511.0 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,265.6 miles, are in place with 1,058.5 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 15.3 miles and 942.9 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For summary of levee work Table 41-N. Mississippi River and Tributaries--Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 41-G.) Work included dredging 22,832,500 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was Performed by government-owned dredge Jadwin. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by the Government-owned dustpan dredge Hurley and leased dust pan dredge Wallace George. The MR&T Harbor maintained in Memphis District was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by leased cutterhead dredge Pontchartrain. MR&T Harbors maintained in Vicksburg District were Greenville Harbor and Vicksburg by cutterhead dredge Marion. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 41-H, 41-1, and 41-J.) Construction of 2.65 miles of new bank revetment and 141,270 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 1.46 miles of new dikes were constructed and required maintenance was performed. Approximately 1.34 miles of new bank revetment Was constructed on the Atchafalaya River. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, SUpplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 41-U. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 1,034.5 miles of operative bank revetment and 302.8 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 142.0 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 85.1 miles of revetment and 5.9 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 41-H, 41-1, and 41-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. Construction of levee enlargements and floodwalls continued on the east and west protection levees, and levees west of Berwick. In FY 00, two contracts were awarded: one for levee enlargement W123 E96/99 and one for Erosion 41-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Protection. Three other levee enlargement contracts were completed (Teche Ridge Frankin, E84B & Wax Lake West A). Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, condition and operation studies, and water control management activities were continued. New Orleans District hired labor personnel, repaired and replaced guide walls at Berwick Lock, repaired the northwest dolphin at Bayou Boeuf Lock and repaired the Bayou Darbone Central Structure. Vicksburg District hired labor performed major repair on the Courtebleau weirs. Lock operating machinery was replaced/ upgraded at Bayou Sorrel Lock. A contract was awarded for SW guide wall replcement and moaring dolphin construction at Bayou Boeuf Lock. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 1,447,375 cubic yards by two leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay Harbor at a total cost of $1,769,305. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 93 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,790,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 387.5 miles are built to grade. See Table 41-K for status of levees. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed when development of the initially constructed portion warrants expansion. Project expansion has not been necessary. Therfore this feature was deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as amended. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works below Morgan City, modification of existing structures and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 53.6 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 41-H. Flood Control ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA Location. The project lies in the lower part of the Atchafalaya Basin which is situated in south-central Louisiana. It lies in parts of Iberville, Iberia, Point Coupee, St. Martin, St. Mary and St. Landry Parishes. Further, it is limited to the part of the Atchafalaya River Basin that has been confined between protection or guide levees that are about 15 miles apart. The northern boundary, west of the Atchafalaya River, lies along the south right-of-way line for the Union Pacific Railroad near the south side of U.S. Highway 190 between the West Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (WABPL) and the west limits of the Town of Krotz Springs, thence southerly along the west limits of the town and easterly along the south limits of the town to the Atchafalaya River; east of the Atchafalaya River it lies along the southern right-of-way line for the Union Pacific Railroad. The eastern and western boundaries lie at the floodside toes of the East Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (EABPL) and WABPL, respectively. The area within these limits has been calculated at about 595,000 acres. Existing Project. This project consists of the acquisition of 50,000 acres of fee title, excluding minerals, from willing sellers and 338,000 acres of easements including: developmental control and environmental protection and in some cases flowage easements. All acquisition is over privately owned land. The state will provide its 150,000 acres of existing lands and also about 30,000 acres of land donated by the Dow Chemical Company to accomplish the project features. Other state and Federal lands in the project area include 15,000 acres acquired by the Department of Interior for the Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge and 12,000 acres acquired by the State for the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area. Additionally, the project includes features to protect and improve the environmental resources of the area and to provide for improved recreational use. To date approximately 36,998 acres of fee and 143,729 acres of easements have been negotiated. Local Cooperation: A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is not required for the acquisition of flowage, developmental control and environmental protection easements nor for acquisition of the public access lands (fee). A PCA will be required for the unscheduled work, such as the Operations and Maintenance and Recreation features. One recreational 41-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION feature, the Simmesport boat launch and appurtenant facilities, has been approved for construction. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year 00: During FY 00, more restrictive easements were acquired over 19,737 acres. Approximately 698 acres of addi-tional fee were negotiated in FY 00. Project Master Plan was signed Aug. 22, 2000. Operational Management Plan is approved and implemented. During FY 00, the project operations staff expanded providing increased on site Environmental Protection and Recreational Assistance, Reforestation and Trail Improvement Activities were implemented by contract during FY 00. Conditions as of Sep 30. In FY 00, approximately 19,737 acres of easements from 100 ownerships were negotiated and approximately 698 acres were purchased in fee from willing sellers. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as inactive. If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in FY 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, 1983 and 1997. The structure was operated in 1994 to transfer fresh water from the Mississippi River to Lake Pontchartrain. The structure was operated for one month from March 17-April 17, 1997, to reduce flood stages. Needle replacement began in FY 96 with the purchase of about 625 needles for $80,000. The total replacement quantity required is approximately 7,000. An additional cable security system has been installed through needle eyes to prevent needles from dislodging during severe storms. Natural Resources and Recreation Project Master Plan was approved and implemented. Operational Management Plan is under development. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, and engineering studies. Natural Resources and Recreation Master Plan is under development. Operations and Maintenance Activity includes development of Old River Cooperative Visitor Center. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $292,273,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, 41-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 41-H for details of bank protection.) LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA Location. The project is located near Angola, LA, in West Feliciana Parish, approximately 40 miles northwest of Baton Rouge, LA, and borders the Louisiana State Penitentiary along the Mississippi River and State of Mississippi state line. Existing Project. The project provides for improving about 12 miles of existing levees along the Mississippi River which currently afford flood protection to the penitentiary on the left descending bank below Old River. The existing levees are owned and maintained by the State of Louisiana and are substandard with regard to Federal specifications. By improving the existing levees to Federal standards, the project will reduce the risk of flooding with its attendant property damage and threat to the lives of up to 5,100 inmates and about 1,750 employees and residents (527 reside on the penitentiary grounds). Funds to initiate preconstruction, engineering and design were appropriated in FY 91 and funds to initiate construction were appropriated in FY 98. Local Cooperation. The limited Reevaluation Report was approved on July 2, 1999 and formed the basis for execution of the Project Cooperation Agreement which was approved on July 30, 1999. The local Sponsor, the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections has provided cash in the amount of $1,150,000 in addition to furnishing the lands and damages necessary to support their share of the project cost. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 99 with the award of three contracts in September 1999. Two contracts are for the levee upstream of Camp C and the other is for replacement of the existing drainage structure. The two levee contracts upstream of Camp C are about 85 percent complete and the drainage structure contract is also about 85 percent complete. Salinity Control Structures MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA CAERNARVON FRESHWATER STRUCTURE, BRAITHWATE, LA DIVERSION Location. The Caernarvon structure is constructed in the Mississippi River Levee on the left descending bank at mile 81 AHP, just below the St. Bernard- Plaquemines Parish line. Existing Project. The Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion Feature of the Miss. Delta Region Project is capable of diverting up to 8,000 cfs of River water into the Breton Sound Estuary for fish and wildlife habitat enhancement. River stages and the fresh water needs of the estuary, determined by monitoring data, establish the actual quantities to be diverted. Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the State of Louisiana was signed in June 1987. Cost sharing for initial construction and ongoing operations and maintenance is 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. The project is operated and maintained by Plaquemines Parish, under the direction of the LA Department of Natural Resources. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began in 1988 and was completed in 1991, at a Federal cost of $19,700,000 and a non-Federal cost of $6,500,000. Diversions have been ongoing, as needed, since August 1991. The goal of fish and wildlife habitat improvement has been met or exceeded, most notably in the areas of seed oyster availability on the public oyster grounds, a large variety and volume of recreational fishing and duck hunting. DAVIS POND FRESHWATER DIVERSION STRUCTURE, LA Location. The Davis Pond structure is under construction in the Mississippi River Levee on the right descending bank at mile 118 AHP, in St. Charles Parish, two miles Luling, LA. Existing Project. The Davis Pond Freshwater Diversion Feature of the Miss. Delta Region Project will be capable of diverting up to 10,650 cfs of River water into the Barataria Bay Estuary for fish and wildlife habitat enhancement. Fresh water needs of the estuary, determined by monitoring data, will establish the actual quantities diverted. Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed in April 1993 with the State of Louisiana. Cost sharing for initial construction and 41-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION ongoing operations and maintenance is 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. The project will be operated and maintained by St. Charles Parish, under the direction of the LA Department of Natural Resources. Condition as of Sep. 30. Of the eight construction contracts to be completed before diversions will commence, three are complete. Three contracts are underway, and should be completed in CY 2000. Two minor contracts are scheduled to be advertised, awarded and completed in CY 2000. The Davis Pond feature is scheduled to be capable of diverting River water in CY 2001, if the need exists. Final construction and ongoing monitoring under the construction phase of this feature will continue into 2004. Estimated total first cost is $106,400,000. The estimated Federal share is $79,800,000 and the estimated non-Federal share is $26,600,000. New Orleans District MISSISSIPPI - LOUISIANA ESTUARINE AREAS, LA/MS BONNET CARRE' FRESHWATER DIVERSION STRUCTURE, LA Location. The Bonnet Carre' structure will be constructed in the upstream end of the Bonnet Carre Spillway structure, on the left descending bank of the Mississippi River at Mile 129 AHP, in St. Charles Parish, LA. Existing Project. The Bonnet Carre Project will be capable of diverting up to 30,000 cfs of River water into the Lake Pontchartrain, Lake Borgne/Biloxi Marsh Estuarine Area for fish and wildlife habitat enhancement. Fresh water needs of the area, determined by monitoring data, will establish actual diversion quantities. Condition as of Sep. 30. Before construction can proceed, a Project Cooperation Agreement must be signed with the States of Louisiana and Mississippi. Louisiana has withdrawn their support of the project until agreement between Louisiana and Mississippi can be reached on how the project will be operated. Federal cost of the Project is estimated to be $74,600,000. The construction, operation and maintenance of the Project Will be shared as follows: Federal, 75%; La, 20%; MS, Vicksburg District LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Little Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. Big Bayou Meto Gate operating mechanisms replaced FY 94, 95, 96. LOWER RED RIVER SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. A Project Management Plan to address replacement of the drainage structure and pumping plant was approved in Aug 94. A major maintenance report was prepared and approved Sep. 95 recommending replacement of the drainage structure. Design of the replacement structure is complete. Construction is scheduled for initiation in the spring of 2001. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 92 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation. No further work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) will be initiated due to lack of commitment from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D and construction. This project has been placed in the "inactive" category. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill 41-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, no further work will be initiated due to lack of a local sponsor. (b) Red River backwater area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features are complete. Construction of the Durham Prong mitigation feature is complete. Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988, and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 was awarded in January 1991 and is physically complete. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for all of the levee system, except 0.8 miles. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been reclassified as inactive. Design and construction of the Sicily Island Area Levee project is underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 0.8 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 2 pumping plants, 11 miles of channel work, and structural mitigation features. Levee items IA, IB, 3A, 4A, 4B, 5A-R, 5B, Bayou Louis weir and connecting channel, and the Fool River Pump Plant are complete. Construction of Levee Items IE, 2A, 2B and 3B, and the Haha Bayou Pump Plant are underway. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Big Sunflower River, etc. The Project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1944, 1946, 1950, 1962, and 1965. Construction of channel improvements on Steele Bayou, Black Bayou are underway. Construction on Steele Bayou Channel in the Swan Lake Area is being done in phases. Phase V is scheduled for award in July 01. Main Canal is complete. A contract to complete Black Bayou Item 3 was awarded in Sep 2000 and is scheduled for completion Dec 2001. Mitigation for Upper Steele Projects Mitigation for the environmental losses is now underway. Approximately 2,740 acres of cleared lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Basin to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction of the Upper Steele Bayou Projects. This land has been reforested and will be managed for aquatic, wetlands, and waterfowl. A total of 5,250 acres of mitigation will be required for this project. (b) Flood Control Reservoirs (1) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 220.6 feet NGVD on Jul. 2, 2000, and storage in flood control pool was 130,000 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 7,000 cubic feet per second on Mar. 17, 2000. On Sep. 30, 2000, the pool elevation was 218.0 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 98,900 acre-feet. (2) Enid Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued, Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 250.1 feet NGVD on Jul. 2, 2000, when storage in the flood control pool was 271,600 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 7,750 cubic feet per second on Mar. 20, 2000. On Sep. 30, 2000, pool elevation was 243.9 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 183,400 acre-feet. 4,500 ac. ft. of storage in conservation pool was reallocated to municipal and industrial water supply in June 1998. (3) Grenada Lake. (See Table 41-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 217.3 feet NGVD on Apr. 19, 2000, when storage inthe flood control pool was 635,800 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 60,200 cubic feet per second on Apr. 4 2000. On Sep. 30, 2000, the pool elevation Was 41-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 207.7 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 327,600 acre-feet. (4) Sardis Lake (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 256.6 feet NGVD on Jun. 30, 2000, when storage in the flood control pool was 507,500 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 15,800 cubic feet per second on Apr. 6, 2000. On Sep. 30, 2000, the pool elevation was 251.3 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 366,800 acre-feet. A construction contract was awarded for the seismic remediation of Sardis Dam utilizing driven pre-stressed concrete piling as a result of an extensive study and evaluation of the expected performance of the dam during a major earthquake in the New Madrid earthquake zone of the central United States. (c) Greenwood, Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (d) Main stem. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (e) Mississippi Delta, MS. Feasibility studies limited solely to flood control problems in the Big Sunflower River Basin, are complete. No economically feasible projects were identified. A negative feasibility report was forwarded to the Mississippi River Commission in September 1997. (f) Reformulation Study. The uncompleted portions of the Yazoo Basin construction program are being reformulated. This reformulation study includes investigations of the engineering, economic, and environmental aspects of the basin and is being accomplished in 4 phases. These studies will evaluate reasonable arrays of alternatives to the project features that remained after construction of items that were budgeted and scheduled for award in FY 90. The Upper Steele Bayou and Upper Yazoo Project reports were approved on May 25, 1993 and Jun. 21, 1994, respectively. Concerning the final 2 phases, the Yazoo Backwater Reformulation Study began in FY 93 and the Tributaries Reformulation study began in FY 95. The Backwater Study includes nonstructural, structural, and combination plans. Nonstructural features include Conservation and water management easements and reforesting of cleared agricultural lands. Structural features include an array of various capacity pumping stations and a levee alternative. A draft report was released for public review in Sep 2000. The Yazoo Tributaries Reformulation Study is evaluating flood control requirements on nine project features. Study efforts were suspended in 2000 until construction advances in the Upper Yazoo projects. (g) Demonstration Erosion Control. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA NRCS was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to 16 demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. During FY 00, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. Cumulative through FY 00, the District has completed the construction of 188 low drop grade control structures, 600,000 linear feet of bank stabilization, 120,000 linear feet of channel improvement, 23 box culverts, 9 high drop grade control structures, 1,119 riser pipe grade control structures, 72 floodwater retarding structures, and 100,000 feet of levees. (h) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Bank Stabilization. Three bank stabilization items located on the Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers were awarded in FY 94. The work was completed in FY 95. (2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator- Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was completed Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (3) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Three Pelucia Creek pumping stations are complete. Construction of Pelucia Creek, Item 2, Item 3, and Item 4 were completed in FY 94. Pelucia Creek relocations were completed in FY 99. (i) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first 11 items of channel improvement, approximately 77 miles, and nine drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to about 10 miles downstream of Greenwood, Mississippi. 41-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure was completed on Apr. 29, 1991. Roebuck Lake and Fort Loring water control structures and Tchula Lake weirs were completed in FY 95. Item 3A-2 levee was completed in FY 94. Channel Item 3A-1 was completed in FY 96. Item 3A-2 channel work was completed in FY 97. This item contains the first thin layer disposal site. Channel Item 3B-I was completed in FY 99. Channel Item 3B-2 was completed in FY 00. Channel Item 4A was awarded in FY 00 and is scheduled for completion in FY 01. Channel Item 4B was awarded in FY 01. Design efforts for Channel Item 5 are underway. Item 5A is scheduled for award in Nov 01 and Item 5B for Apr 01. The Alligator-Catfish water control structure was completed in FY 98. This structure has been renamed the J. Tol Thomas Water Control Structure. Mitigation for Upper Yazoo Projects. Mitigation for the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 8,183 acres of cleared, frequently flooded lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Basin area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction of the Upper Yazoo Projects. This land has been reforested and will be managed for aquatic, wetlands, and water fowl. A total of 17,000 acres of mitigation will be required for this project. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Items IA and I B have been completed. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations have been constructed to mitigate for the waterfowl impacts of the project. Mitigation of the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently flooded, agricultural lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the Yazoo Area and Satartia Area levees projects. This land has been reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 65 percent complete. Memphis District CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts were awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 4 percent complete. Construction of the authorized project was stopped in 1978 due to environmental opposition. Reevaluation studies of the authorized plan were initiated in June 1987 to provide a more environmentally balanced plan. The reevaluation effort was terminated on Dec. 15, 1994, due to a lack of local sponsorship. The Memphis District has initiated action to turn the acquired mitigation lands (7,959 acres) over to the U.S. Department of Interior. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL FRANCIS BLAND FLOODWAY DITCH (EIGHT MILE CREEK), ARKANSAS Location. The project is located in the City of Paragould, AR. Existing Project. The existing project consist of 12.5 miles of channel improvements. Eight miles of channel enlargement will occur in the rural downstrean area of Paragould. Three and a half miles of enlargement will occur in the City of Paragould along with one mile of channel riprap/stabilization. The project will provide 100 year flood protection within the City of Paragould. Local Cooperation. A project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was assigned in June 1996. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The contract work on the rural eight miles of channel has been completed The City of Paragould continues to work to provide PCA requirements (lands, relocation, etc.) for the work within the city. 41-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION HELENA AND VICINITY, AR Location. The project is located in the City of Helena, AR. Existing Project. The existing project consists of 1.41 miles of earthen and concrete channel enlargement within the city limits of Helena, AR. The concrete channel will be constructed primarily under streets while the earthen channel is in an undeveloped section of the city. Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed in August 1997. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The contract for the earthen channel improvements has been done. The City of Helena is working to meet PCA (lands, relocations, etc.) requirement for advertisement of the second construction contract, the concrete channel. HICKMAN BLUFF, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts were awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Location. The Hickman Bluff project is located in extreme southwestern Kentucky approximately one mile from the Mississippi River. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1995 and completed in September 2000. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1989 and completed in December 1994. HORN LAKE CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES INCLUDING COW PEN CREEK, TENNESSEE AND MISSISSIPPI Location. Horn Lake Creek is located in north- West Desoto County, MS and southwest Shelby County, Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Nov. 17, 1986, under authority of Title IV, Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources velopment Act. The project consists of 3.5 miles of drift removal and 2.75 miles of channel clearing on Horn Lake Creek; 2.1 miles of channel clearing on Rocky Creek and 0.62 miles of channel clearing and 1.85 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. The project will provide 1.1-year flood frequency protection on Horn Lake and Rocky Creeks and 25-year flood frequency protection on Cow Pen Creek. The construction is complete. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Horn Lake Creek Watershed Drainage District on Feb. 26, 1992. Condition as of Sep. 30. The final contract for work on Cow Pen Creek was awarded in September 1997 and was completed in Sept. 1998. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (c) White River Backwater Levee-Hudson's Landing to MRL. Gravel surface awarded on Sep. 21, 1999. (d) White River Navigation. Cutterhead hydraulic pipeline awarded on Jun. 16, 1999. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. There were no contracts awarded or completed this fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded this year. (c) White River Backwater Levee. Levee stabilization is complete. (d) Des Arc Arkansas. Bank stabilization, completed. (e) White River Navigation. Cutterhead hydraulic pipeline, completed on Oct. 15, 1998. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. 41-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1990 and is 50 percent complete. Item 1, channel awarded Apr. 27, 2000, 90 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor maintenance on levees is performed by the local interests and major maintenance is performed as required for slide repairs, road rehabilitation, and other similar work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Channel Improvement. Stone Dike construction at Dismal Point, AR, and Below Ensley, TN, completed in FY 2000. Below Island 9, TN Dike construction awarded Jul. 22, 1999, completed in FY 2000. Above Loosahatchie, TN Dike construction, awarded Jun. 29, 1999, completed in FY 2000. Wolf Island, KY Dike construction, awarded Jun. 30, 2000, 0 percent complete. Commerce-Birds Pt. Levee raise awarded May 25, 1999, 100% complete. Below Commerce, MO relief wells, parcel 2, awarded Jul. 30, 1999, 100% complete. Stone Dike Construction Mississippi River awarded Jun. 30, 1998, and was 62.7 percent complete. Montezuma Bar, stone dike construction on Mississippi River awarded Jul. 20, 1998, completed Aug. 1999. Stewart Towhead, MO dikes awarded Jun. 30, 1999, completed Oct. 1999. Below Island 9, TN Dike construction awarded Jul. 22, 1999 60% completed. Above Loosahatchie, TN Dike construction, awarded Jun. 29, 1999 0% complete. REELFOOT LAKE - LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 95 percent complete. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO (a) Little River Drainage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real estate activities are continuing. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 95 percent complete. (b) Lower St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. WG Huxtable Pumping Plant, impeller replacement awarded on Jan. 30, 1998. Ditch 56 Culvert Replacement awarded on Aug. 25, 1998, and is 15% complete. Awarded Ditch 9 Lake City cleanout on Sep. 14, 1999, is complete. (c) Upper St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Ditch I and 6, bridges, Miles 1.21 and 2.95 awarded Sep. 7, 1999, is complete. Ditch I and 6, 1-155 Drop Structure, awarded Aug. 30, 1999, 95 percent complete. Main and ditch 2, Item 2, Channel Enlargement, awarded May 30, 2000, 10 percent complete. Ditches 21A and 21B, culverts, initiated Jul. 31, 2000, 80 percent complete. Big Lake Floodway Ditch, bridge below Highway 18, awarded Sep. 15, 2000, 0 percent complete. Highway 90, channel restoration, awarded Sep. 12, 2000, 0 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project initiated 1937. Project is 90 percent complete. ST. JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the first item of work (4.3 miles of vegetative clearing) was completed in Oct. 97. NEPA coordination activities continue for remaining items for work. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction on remaining items can not be initiated until NEPA processing is completed. Remaining construction work on the First Phase include approximately 23.3 miles of channel improvements and two pumping stations. Work scheduled this summer after compliance with NEPA and receipt of rights-of-way from locals includes initiating a channel enlargement item and work on the New Madrid Pumping Station. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. Project is currently inactive due to lack of local support; however, locals have formally requested assistance in developing an environmentally sensitive plan of improvement. A preliminary time and cost estimate for a general reevaluation have been prepared. 41-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Forked Deer River and principal tributaries, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 14 percent complete. (b) Obion River and principal tributaries, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 68 percent complete. (c) Riprap Protection at four sites Dyer, Crockett, Haywood, and Lauderdale awarded Aug. 29, 1996, is complete. Riprap protection at 3 sites Dyer, Crockett, and Lauderdale counties awarded on Aug. 10, 1998, and was completed Aug. 18, 1999. Shutdown plan control structures at 3 sites, Dyer and Lauderdale counties awarded on Aug. 3, 1998, was completed Sep. 1999. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 60 percent complete. WHITEMAN'S CREEK, ARKANSAS Location. The project is located in the city of Jonesboro, AR. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, on Oct. 31, 1992. The project consists of 6.1 miles of channel improvements on Whiteman's, Turtle, Moore's and Higginbottom Creeks. The improvements provide 10-year level of flood protection along Whiteman's, Turtle and Moores and 25-year protection on Higginbottom. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed May 31, 1996. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The second and final contract for work on Whiteman's and Turtle Creek's was advertised in November 1999, and scheduled for completion in September 1999. 41-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-957' Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL 10-81 The Jump-New Orleans, LA 11-25 Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA 118 Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) 81 Caernarvon, LA 44-91 Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA 81-96 New Orleans, LA 91-104 New Orleans, LA 96-279 104-234 New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA 127-129 Bonnet CarreD Floodway, LA 129 Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA/MS (Bonnet CarrelO) 129-234 Bonnet Carre 0-Baton Rouge, LA 235 Baton Rouge Harbor 279-287 Morganza Floodway, LA 287-303 Morganza-Old River, LA 303-314 Old River, LA control 314-572 Old River-Cypress Creek, AR 437 Vicksburg Harbor, MS 437-721 Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Public Law 100-676 Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79526 and 83-780. 41-16 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 803-873 857 890 890 890-954 902-922 922 946 9571 957 Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Tiptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, TN St. Johns Bayou, MO New Madrid Floodway, MO New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Hickman, KY Peafield, MO Cairo, Cairo drainage Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Mounds, Mound City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Island, IL Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank Drainage floodgate Floodwalls and levees district Floodwalls, levees, and pumping plant Levees, both banks Levees 41-17 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. -- -- Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. __ Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA' Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways 0-54 West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou 27-54 Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou 54-117 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) 20-27 Lacour-Red Cross 25-117 Morganza-Morgan City 27 Bayou Latenache 0-27 Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area 31-57 Bayou Fordoche-Ramah 80 Bayou Sorrel' 53-117 Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City 17 Morgan City 117-129 Below Morgan City 117-129 Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee 105 Calumet 105-120 Below Morgan City 115 Berwick' 116 Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) 5 Simmesport-Hamburg Floodway Floodway Floodway Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 41-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 41-18 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 5-105 29 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins and appurtenant works Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, Vermilion Basins. Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- 41-19 East bank, levee 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-8 50-133 96 133 Drainage channel Drainage channel Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Bayou Rapides Pumping plant and gravity structure Red River-Moncla to Lake Long Flood protection Parish, LA Bank protection Levee, south bank Levee, south bank Levees Outlet to gulf Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee. (2,3) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Senate Doc. (Public Law 84-99) Added to project by Public Law 101-514. Intermittent (Sec. 6). 41-20 Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing 0-17 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 82-145 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeufand Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR and LA BoeufRiver, AR and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou La Fourche Boeuf River, AR and LA above Bayou La Fourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977, MR&T authority. 2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516. 2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.23 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 41-E (5) (5) Al .91 3-56 3-56 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 0-22 0-0.2 To divert flows from Lake Chicot Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Clearing (6) Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary ofBayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR, to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 41 -C. Flood detention and conservation See Table 41-C. Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway -- Channel improvement 41-22 Aquifer protection. water supply and environmental improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank 23-98 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 Sardis Lake Yocono River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou enlargement of pumping plant. Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries structures Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS, and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure 41-23 See Table 41-C. See Table 41-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. -- Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.' Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 41-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 41-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 13-55 0-68 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN 99 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 41-24 Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (s) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 41-D. -- See Table 41-C. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. -- -- -_ Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Obion Creek, KY LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO MISSOURI RIVER, MO Mouth to St. Charles, MO ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Mouth to Havana, IL OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, IL Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtenant structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Levees Levees Levees Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970. See Table 41-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). Floodwall, levee, revetment, and pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 41 -D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 41-25 0-20 0-15 0-47 0-28 0-120 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Francis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, feet, NGVD 193.0 230.0 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1.252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by 14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 231.0 268.0 281.4 238.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 52 50 132 89 229 Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, NGVD 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. 41-26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Jun. 19, 1930 Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Feb. 15, 1933 Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre0 Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Apr. 23, 1934 Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Aug. 30, 1935 Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title). Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. Jun. 15, 1936 Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Aug. 28, 1937 Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Jun. 28, 1938 Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Aug. 18, 1941 Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., I st sess. Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 351, 72d Cong. Public Law 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., Ist sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., Ist sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., Ist sess. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., I st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., i st sess. 41-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 22, 1944 Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Jul. 24, 1946 Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS.' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR.' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou).' Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA.' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Jun. 30, 1948 Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA.' May 17, 1950 Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., ist sess. H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., Ist sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 41-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA.' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. Bank protection, Amite River, LA. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' 1st sess. Oct. 30, 1951 Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR. Sep. 3, 1954 Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. Jul. 3, 1958 Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Jul. 14, 1960 Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- $50 million. Oct. 23, 1962 Modification--Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. Jun. 18, 1965 Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., Public Law 237, 82d Cong., Ist sess. S. Doec. 53, 82d Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., Ist sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874 Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. 41-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Oct. 27, 1965 Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. Apr. 14, 19662 Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA. Nov. 7, 1966 Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., I st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report. Approved Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. 41-30 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Apr. 29, 19703 Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. Jun. 4, 1970' Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. Dec. 31, 1970 Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively. 4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Jan. 19, 19732 Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. TITLE I Water Projects recommended by four completed reports were Resources authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum Development of advance engineering and design on: Act of 1974. a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1 st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, Ist sess. H. Doc. 93-157, Ist sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. 41-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1976. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. I-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. 41-32 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report. 2 Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase 1 - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA. Jun. 28, 1980 The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. 41-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act. 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1986 For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. The work is unscheduled. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 41-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. h. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, La. Not mentioned, but this Act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. In particular establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement feature of the project is of national significance, and therefore, a 100 percent Federal cost. Energy i. Lower Atchafalaya Basin Reevaluation Study. Authority and water to, within available funds, investiage conditions at Wax Development Lake Outlet, Bayou Black, and other features, and Appropriation recommend any modification desirable for flood protection Act, 1994 navigation, and environmental program. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $15,700,000. c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. 41-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Sec. 3(a), Project Authorizations - Authorization of Construction: a. Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area, MS and LA. Authorized the project for environmental enhancement, as contained in the report of Chief of Engineers, dated May 19, 1986, at a total cost of $59,300,000. Section 4(b) West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Modified the project by allowing that non-Federal cooperation may be provided by levee districts, drainage districts, or any unit of a state, county, or local government. Unpublished New Orleans District report, Nov. 1, 1984. Public Law 100-676 Nov. 17, 1988 Public Law 100-676, Nov. 17, 1988 41-36 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, 1990 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-83), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant Directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features for the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. This act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. In particular, establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement feature of this project is of national significance and therefore a 100% federal cost. Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas. Directed the Secretary of the Army to implement flood control improvement, which essentially consist of 6.1 miles of channel enlargement along streams within the city limits of Jonesboro, Arkansas. New Madrid Harbor, Missouri Directed the Secretary of the Army to assume responsibility for maintenance of the New Madrid County Harbor constructed by non-Federal interests before that date of the enactment of this Act in lieu of maintaining the existing Federal channel. Grand Prairie and Bayou Basin, Arkansas The project for flood control, Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 174) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be carried out ground water protection and conservation, agricultural water supply, and waterfowl management if the Secretary determines that the change in the scope of the project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economic, as applicable. Public Law 101-83, Jul. 25, 1989 Public Law 101-514, Nov. 5, 1990 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resoureces Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). Public Law 102-580 Oct. 31, 1992 Public Law 102-580 Oct. 31. 1992 Public Law 104-303 Oct. 12, 1996 41-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1999 Water Resources Development Water Resources Development Acts, 1986, 1990 and 1999 White River, Arkansas Public Law 104-303 The project for navigation, White river Navigation to Batesville, Arkansas, Oct 12, 1996 authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat 4139) and deauthorized by section 52(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4044), is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, Tennessee Public Law 106-53 Authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, if the Secretary determines Aug. 17, 1999 that the project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically justified, as appropriate. Tunica Lake Weir, Mississippi Public Law 106-53 The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of constructing an outlet weir at Tunica Lake, Tunica county, Mississippi, and Lee County, Arkansas, for the purpose of stabilizing water levels in the lake. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall include as part of the economic analysis the benefits derived from recreation uses at Tunica Lake and economic benefits associated with restoration of fish and wildlife habitat. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River, Louisiana Public Law 99-662 Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army, acting through Nov. 17, 1986 the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, Public Law 101-646 engineering, and construction of improvements of 12 miles of Nov. 28, 1990 existing levee along the Mississippi River which provides flood protection to the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, LA. This act authorizes basic cost sharing principles, and establishes that the cost sharing will be shared on a 75%/25% basis with the state of Louisiana for this project. Authorizes the Secretary of the Army to consider credit for work Public Law 106-53 performed by an non-Federal sponsor since project authorization. Aug. 17, 1999 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 41-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 41-38 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements, TN Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA Big Sunflower River, etc. Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) Jonesville, LA Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 79-526 79-526 79-526 79-526 79-526 79-526 80-858 81-516 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 1941, p. 943 1946, p. 1029 1946, p. 1053 1946, p. 1083 1945, p. 982 1946, p. 1061 1948, p. 1059 1953, p. 773 1953, p. 737 41-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 2000 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Francis Bland Floodway Ditch (Eight Mile Creek), AR L'Anguille River, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance), MS St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS Horn Lake Creek Modification, TN & MS Wappapello Lake, MO (RAMP) Greenville Harbor, MS Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm), TN Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR Helena, AR, and Vicinity West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, LA Hickman Bluff, KY Whiteman's Creek, AR Reelfoot Lake, KY and TN (Ecosystem Restoration) 41-40 $ 339,236,000 2,106,000,000 5,270,0003 4,000,000' 3,863,000,000 1,790,000,000 176,000,000 20,400,000' 292,273,000 23,200,000' 50,000,000' 99,800,000 477,631,000 29,676,0003 208,000,000 1,821,029,000 16,802,000' 55,900,000' 155,000,000 401,600,000 9,270,0003 15,100,000' 153,300,000 14,300,0003 (10,700,000) 3 440,000 10,260,0003 26,100,0003 29,200,000 61,400,000 18,400,0004 3,120,000 825,000 585,000 31,000,000 23,100,0004 32,156,000a 8,590,00046 11,600,0006 63,500,000r 19,500,000, 17,510,000 3,300,000 18,900,000 s MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED (Continued) FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 2000 Mississippi - Louisiana Estuarine Areas, MS and LA 71,300,0005 Eastern Arkansas, AR 14,0003 Jackson and Trenton, AR 9,650,000' Mississippi Delta, MS 61,600,0003 Bushley Bayou, LA 37,000,000 Bayou Meto, AR 125,000,000 Clarendon Levee, AR 1,576,000 Augusta to Clarendon, AR 12,601,000 Memphis Metro, TN 26,000,000 Wolf River, TN 6,350,000 Morganza, LA, to Gulf of Mexico 442,000,000 Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY 20,152,000 Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN 22,500,000 TOTAL $13,342,116,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads. 2. Includes Bonnet CarrelO, Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). 4. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 5. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, Nov. 18, 1988. 6. Locals built their own project. 7. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1999, Public Law 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999. 8. Authorized by Water Resource Development Act of 1999, Public Law 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 and Report of the Chief of Engineers, Dec. 23, 1999. 9. Reauthorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1999, Public Law 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999. 10. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 2000, Public Law 106-541, Dec. 11. 2000. 41-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Mileage Fiscal Year 2000 Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 -- 226.7 226.7 Main stem channel 234-320 -- -- -- (Smithland and Wilkinson Pt Crossings) Atchafalaya Basin 1150.4 1150.4 Berwick Bay Harbor 324.2 324.2 Three Rivers Old River Lock Forebay 304 153.3 153.3 and Tailbay Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 -- 1,725.3 1,725.3 Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 85.0 85.0 Greenville Harbor 537 -- 488.9 488.9 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 -- 18,231.2 18,231.2 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 -- 447.5 TOTAL -- 25,832.5 22,832.5 41-42 TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operat Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This F Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linea Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Venice, LA ................................. 12 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 49,5 Olga, LA ................................. 19 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,05 Lower Childress-Fort Jackson, LA 22 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,43 Neptune, LA ................................. 23 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,3 Buras, LA .............................. 25 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,28 A Tropical Bend, LA................... 30 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,01 Bayou Lamoque, LA .................. 33 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,50 Port Sulphur, LA ........................ 39 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 36,99 Nestor, LA ............................... 41 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12.42 Point Michel, LA ........................ 44 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,93 Bohemia, LA .............................. 46 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,44 Diamond, LA ........... ........... 49 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11.60 Gravolet, LA ...................... 51 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,87 Junior, LA..................................... 54 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,59 Harlem, LA.............................. 56 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,14 Myrtle Grove, LA.......................... 59 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,43 Monsecour, LA.......................... 61 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,34 Alliance, LA ............................ 62 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,26 Belair, LA ................................ 65 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,11 Jesuit Bend, LA ........................... 68 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,97 Linwood, LA ................................. 71 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,64 Oak Point, LA................................ 72 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,42 Scarsdale, LA ............................ 75 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,82 English Turn, LA ........................ 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,84 Poydras, LA ..................... . 82 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45,86 Twelve Mile Point, LA............... 84 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,97 Cutoff, LA ............................. 88 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,23 ive ,Y ir 52 3 )9 32 2 )5 5 0 2 0 C 4 D 9 8 5 0 5 I 8 3 6 5 5 4 9 4 TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Third district reach, LA ........... Algiers Point, LA............................ Gouldsboro, LA ....................... Gretna Bend, LA.......................... Greenville Bend, LA...................... Carrollton Bend, LA ..................... Avondale Bend, LA ...................... Kenner, LA .................................... Luling, LA .................................... Destrehan, LA................................ Good Hope, LA ............................. Waterford, LA ...................... Montz, LA ........................ Lucy, L A ........................ .............. Reserve, LA .................... Willow Bend, LA........................... Angelina, LA ................................. Vacherie, LA ................................ Belmont, LA ............................ Rich Bend, LA................. ..... Romeville, LA ........................ St. Alice, LA.......................... Burnside, LA ............................... Aben, LA ................... ...... .... St. Elmo, LA................ ............. Smoke Bend, LA ............ ....... Marchand, LA.............................. Philadelphia Point, LA ............ New River Rend, LA ................. 93 95 96 97 100 104 109 114 119 102 126 128 132 136 138 141 145 148 152 157 161 165 170 172 174 177 180 183 185 L R R R R L R L R L L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L 1,205 -- ] 678 rr -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 515 6,666 2,625 �-- -- - AA Al 13,356 -- 9,881 13,760 .... -- -- -- -- 0 O r C7) 7d 0o 0 t c3 O n Erm 5C~ C C -] , 28,372 12,238 4,960 10,340 22,045 16,262 28,409 45,492 44,893 5,409 24,531 21,264 17,502 19,450 23,234 13,227 32,762 26,025 25,575 38,498 33,986 31,130 29,304 11,700 12,014 18,792 19,603 5,379 45,672 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -I -- - -- 1,69 5,26 .. .. .. -- -- 2,334 TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operati Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This F' Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linea Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: White Castle, LA ........................ 193 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45,96 St. Gabriel, LA ................... 201 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,29 Plaquemine Bend, LA.............. 209 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45,01 Manchac, LA ............................. 215 L -- -- -- -- -- 3,454 -- 38,97 Missouri Bend, LA ..................... 222 R -- -- -- 1,406 6,204 -- 30,43 Arlington, LA ............................. 227 L -- -- -- -- -- .. -- 18,05 Port Allen, LA ............................... 231 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,62 Scotlandville, LA..................... 234 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,62 SAllendale, LA .............................. 238 R -- -- -- -- -- 6,677 -- 28,69J Springfield Bend. LA .................. 244 L -- -- -- .-.-- - -- -- 25,69 Arboth, LA .................................... 250 R 3,336 538 11,123 -- -- -- -- 2352 Faulkner Lake, LA.................... 253 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,80 Grand Bay, LA .......................... 258 R -- -- -- -- -- 11,759 -- 24,905 Bayou Sara, LA ........................... 265 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,722 Red Store, LA.......................... 269 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,464 Arrow Bend, LA........................... 272 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,600 Boies Point, LA ............................. 275 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,094 Morganza, LA ............................ 279 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,513 Iowa Point, LA .......................... 282 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,477 Brunette Point, LA................... 285 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,335 Greenwood Bend. LA.............. 289 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,032 Hog Point, LA ........................ 296 R -- -- -- -- 37,516 Carr Point, LA ........................ 304 R -- -- --. 20,725 Above Old River, LA .... ......... 305 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,958 Fort Adams, MS ...................... 308 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,206 Point Breeze, LA ....................... 313 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,565 Coochie, LA .................................. 317 R -- -- -- -- -- 3,087 -- 17,150 ve Y r 8 2 2 co 7 4 0 7 I, 8 . 3 Cm TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Palmetto, MS................................. Total Revetment New Orleans District, Mississippi River..................... Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ..................... Hog Point, LA ............................... Hog Point Chute Closure ............... Total Dikes New Orleans District, Mississippi River ................ OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard Revetment: Inflow channel ........................... Inflow channel .................. ........ Outflow channel ........................ Auxiliary inflow channel .............. Auxiliary outflow channel ............. Total Standard Revetment, Ol\d River ........................... 322 252 299 300 315 315 315 312 312 L -- L L R L R L&R L&R L&R 5,219 1,053 20,414 3,954 21,929 50,538 -- 1,905,518 (.99 Miles) (360.89 Miles) - -- -- -- . -- 4,315 - - .. .. .. -- 6,850 - -- -- -900 12,065 (2.29 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,415 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,365 19,891 - -- -- -- -- - 17,200 -- -- -- -- -- 5,790 -- -- -- -- -- 5,790 ON :0 0 C z 0 Ct t 0 0 34,650 all' TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Below Conflu- Operations This FY Nonence ofConstructi Operative Red and New Work Since Operat Atcha- Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru falaya R sion Lap FY This F Rivers or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linea Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard Revetment: Mile One, LA ............................ L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,15 Coville Bayou, LA.................... 3 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,55 Legonier, LA .............................. 4 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,94 Simmesport, LA ......................... 6 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,49 Kuhlman Bayou, LA................. 7 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,56 Odenburg, LA ......................... 9 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,37 Jacoby, LA................................ 10 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,39 . Cason, LA............. ............ 12 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,79 L M cCrea, LA ............................... 13 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,57 Woodside, LA ..................... 14 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13.00 Provosty, LA ............................... 17 L -- - -- -- -- - - -- 9,11 Crooked Bayou, LA................. 18 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,244 Mercier, LA............................ 22 L -- -- -- -- -- 5,342 -- 10,47 Barberton, LA ........................... 23 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,59 Evans Point, LA................... 24 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,668 Goudeau, LA .............................. 26 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,93 Morris Bayou, LA ...................... 27 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,44( Goodwood, LA ........................ 28 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,50 Red Cross, LA ........................... 29 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,06 Melville LA ....................... 30 R -- -- -- -- -- - -- 5,66 Cross Bayou, LA ........................... 31 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,065 Melville South, LA ..................... 33 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,34( Toles, LA...................................... 35 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,355 Petite Prairie, LA .......................... 36 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,381 Three Mile Bayou, LA................ 37 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,330 ive Y Lr 0 4 0 g 1 (/ 5 5 0 m 8 2 5 2 6 8 O 22 TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Below Operations This FY Non- C onflu- ence of Construction Operative Red and New Work Since Operative Atcha- Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru falaya R sion Lap FY This FY Rivers or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Holloway Lake, LA............... Bayou Sherman, LA.................... Krotz Springs, LA ....................... Sherburne, LA ............................. Bayou Big Graw, LA ................... Courtableau, LA ............................ Coswell Bayou, LA ..................... Alabama Bayou, LA...................... Indian Bauyou ............................ Happy Town, LA........................... co Otis Landing, LA........................... Morgan City, LA ......................... 37 38 40 43 46 49 48 50 52 53 54 115 L L R R R R LL R L R L 7,098 -- 32,287 Total Standard Revertment Atchaalaya River Dikes: Ten Mile Dikes .............................. LOWER RED RIVER Standard Revetment: Long Lake, LA ............................ Naples, LA................... .......... Turnbull Island, LA....................... 10 R Below Confluence of Old River Outflow Channel and Red River (Miles) 10 7 9 R R L Tota\ Standard Revetment 7,098 (1.34 Miles) 7,085 5,200 7,925 10,960 8,394 5,374 6,490 9,410 7,098 7,285 5,251 3,410 32,287 0 0C/] n g 1C< 0 0 U, OI n C C o>i a 2 5,342 282,889 (53.58 Miles) 2,500 (.47 Miles) 6,652 6, 190 11,038 23,880 (4.52 Miles) TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operati Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap Maintenance FY This F' Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of (Tons of (Linear (Lineal Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) Stone) Feet) Feet) Dikes: None MISSISSIPPI RIVER Foreshore Protection: Port Allen ................................ 228.3 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,50 Cottage Plantation ...................... 222.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,00 Upper Plaquemine Point ................... 210.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,35 Lower Plaquemine Point ............ 207.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Point Pleasant ............................. 201.7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,22 Upper Point Clair......................... 196.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Point Clair ............................... 191.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,25 Belle Grove................................ 189.9 R - - - - - - - Eighty-One Mile Point .................. 176.0 L - - -- -- -- Donaldsonville ............................ 174.2 R - - - - - - - Point Houmas ................................ 168.9 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,40 Sunshine ................... ............. . 167.4 L -- -- -- ---- -- -- 90 Union .......................................... 166.3 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,50( Convent ....................................... 158.3 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,90 Oak Alley .................................... 153.4 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,80 Lutcher ........................................ 148.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,91( Wallace ....................... 145.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,39( Garyville.......... ..... ......... 140.4 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Edgard .......................... 138.2 R 4,710 -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,4 ( Reserve ................................... 136.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,20 Waterford ................................... 129.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 50( 26 Mile Point .............................. 122.8 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,32 Destrehan ..................... 121.0 L -- -- -- - -- -- -- St. Rose ..................................... 120.8 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,83( Lower St. Rose ......................... 116.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,05( Ama................................. 115.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ve Y r o0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 0 TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap Maintenance FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of (Tons of (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: American Cyanamid ...................... Willswood ........... ............ ...... A vondale ......................... .... ..... Twelve Mile Point......................... Avondale ....................................... Nine Mile Point ............................. Greenville ...................... ......... Snowdrift ......... ................ .......... . Gretna-Gouldsboro ....................... A lgiers ......................... .......... Holy Cross................................ A rabi ...................... .... ............ Quarantine ........................ Huntlee ....................... .......... Chalmette.......................................... Norman ...................... .......... B rou......... ........ ..... . .......... Auora ..................................... B lythe B lvd.................................... Upper Stanton ............................ Saxonholm-Docville ................ Pecan Grove-Story........................ Story-Allo ............ ........... De lacroix ...................................... Twelve Mile Point ............... M errit....................... ................. Saxonholm-Doeville ...................... Naval Depot ......................... Caernarvon .............................---.. 114.8 R 113.2 R 109.4 R 108.9 L 105.5 R 105.0 R 100.0 R 97.6 R 96.7 R 95.4 R 92.2 L 91.9 L 91.5 R 90.4 R 90.2 L 90.0 R 89.5 L 89.3 R 88.6 R 86.5 R 86.0 L 85.8 L 84.5 L 84.2 R 83.5 R 83.0 L 82.5 L 82.5 R 81.2 L 4,788 2,430 6,500 4,580 2,070 1,760 6,900 8,450 1,683 1,548 1,915 6,130 3,805 3,139 1,260 2,968 3,030 3,700 4,345 12,890 1,060 1,910 5,400 8,220 1,300 7,800 7,700 3,096 13,200 i LJ Q 0 0 'Si O O '1 0,< I.< 0 r 0 'C C' aa ov 0 O ,< t,J 0 00 I, I, I, -- I, -- -- ,, ,, II- -e -- I- -- ,, ,, ,, ,I ,, ,I -- ,, ,, -- ,, ,, ,, ,, ,I c TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap Maintenance FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of (Tons of (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: English Turn .............................. 79.3 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,500 Little Rock.................................... 78.8 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,268 St. Claire ...................................... 78.8 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,025 Fort St. Leon................... ....... 78.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,700 Scarsdale........... .......... ....... 75.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16.611 Belle Chase................................ 75.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,500 Stella-Delcour..................... .. 73.6 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,405 Oak Point.................................. 73.3 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13.766 Promised Land-Woodlawn ............ 70.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,495 Augusta-Live Oak ..................... 70.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,135 Jesuit Bend .... ................. 69.2 R -- -- -- -- -- - 16,454 Fanny-Belair.................... 66.8 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,400 Sara-Star ..................... .......... 66.3 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,100 Star .......................................... 65.8 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.470 Bayhi ........................................ 64.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11, 90 Burbridge............................... 63.2 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,335 Beau-Carlisle .................... 62.3 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,258 Alliance ................................. 62.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,300 St. Rosalie ........ ..................... 6614. 4 R....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,976 Monsecour-Poverty Point.............. 60.3 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,380 Irontown ......................... 60.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,298 Myrtle Grove-Woodpark ............. 58.8 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,450 Harlem .................................. 57.0 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,550 Wood Park-Deer Range ................ 56.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,650 Nero ............................... 54.7 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,450 Deer Range ................................. 54. 1 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,220 Upper Point-A-La-Hache .............. 53.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,101 Junior....................... ........... 53.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,811 Point Celeste............................. 52.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,300 cr" n C c 2b~n Oz TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operat Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap Maintenance FY This F Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of (Tons of (Linear (Linea Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) Stone) Feet) Feet Foreshore Protection: Davant ..................................... 51.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,7 St. Thomas..................... . 50.0 L -- -- -- - -- -- 6,4 Woodland ...................... 50.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,8 Point-A-La-Hache ...................... 48.1 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,0 Nolan ................... ............. 47.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,4 Socola....................... .......... 46.5 R -- -- -- -- -- 8,2 Point Michel ............................... 44.2 R -- -- -- -- - 7,3 Happy Jack ................................. 43.0 R -- -- -- -- -- 18,7 Port Sulphur................................. 39.7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,4 Little Texas .............................. 39.0 R -- -- - - - - 3( Home Place................................... 37.6 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,2 Nairn..................................... 34.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,9 Sixty Mile Point.......................... 32.1 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tropical Bend .............................. 31.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,7 Bowers......................... 30.8 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,8 Empire ................................... .. 29.7 R -- -- -- -- - 2,8( Anderson ...................... 29.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,1( Fredrick .................................... 27.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,8 Buras ..................................... 26.0 R - -- -- -- -- -- 13,4 Lower Buras .................................. 24.0 R -- -- -- -- -- 8,9 Triumph ......... .............. 22.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- - 5,22 Fort Jackson.............................. 21.9 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,6 Grand Prairie ............................ 19.2 L -- -- -- -- -- 1,35 Upper Commander ...................... 18.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3, Commander ..................... 18.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,23 ive 'Y r 95 30 00 30 00 55 50 85 30 00 50 15 0 75 36 65 )0 20 95 D0 20 90 50 30 32 0 C7 0 cc, , O ve TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap Maintenance FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of (Tons of (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: Boothville-Commander .............. 16.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,824 Upper Venice............................ 12.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,800 Total Foreshore Protection New Orleans District. Mississippi River ..................... 4,710 -- -- -- -- -- -- 749,934 (.89 Miles) (142.03 Miles) I. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Cr CA cwoo C CUtt TABLE 41-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Bougere Bend, LA.................. 329 R -- -- -- -- -- 26,055 Dead Mans Bend, MS................... 335 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,220 Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA............. 342 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,083 Railroad Landing, MS ................... 346 L -- -- . -- -- -- 16,291 St. Catherine Bend, LA............ 350 R -- -- -- -- -- 6,845 -- 29,108 Morville, LA............................ 356 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,917 Natchez Island, MS ................ 357 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,180 Carthage, MS.......................... 361 L -- -- 20,350 Vidalia Casting Field................. 363 L -- -- -- - - 2,670 Natchez Front, MS ..................... 364 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,510 Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ................ 366 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,020 Gibson, LA ................................. 371 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,000 Ashland, LA-MS ........................... 374 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,427 Kempe Bend, LA..................... 383 R 1,802 -- 5,033 -- -- 8,314 -- 30,087 Browns Field, LA ...................... 389 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,280 Goldbottom, MS ......................... 392 L - - - - -- -- 30,250 Hardscrabble, LA ...................... 398 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,530 Grand Gulf, MS .......................... 403 L 1,2007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 57,318 Point Pleasant, MS-LA ............... 413 R -- -- -- -- -- - -- 32,345 Togo Island, LA........................... 415 R -- -- -- -- -- 7,080 Lake Karnac, LA-MS .................... 419 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,260 Diamond Point, LA-MS ................ 423 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,310 Oakbend, MS............................. 425 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,342 Reid-Bedford, LA....................... 429 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,392 Racetrack, MS ........................... 433 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,935 Barge Line Terminal, MS.............. 437 L -- -- -- 2,235 7,055 -- -- 3,040 Vicksburg Harbor, MS ............... 437 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,350 Delta Point, LA....................... 437 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,650 0 0 Cr O 'Cl N, TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000 Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS.................... False Point, LA............................. Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS ....................................... Milliken Bend, LA........................ Belle Island, LA-MS ................... Goodrich, LA................................ Cottonwood Bar, MS ................... Filter-Cottonwood, MS................... Hagaman, LA .............................. Ben Lomond, MS .......................... Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS ............................ Lake Providence, LA.................... Mayersville, MS .......................... Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS ........................... Carolina, MS ............................... Cracraft, AR ................................ Worthington, MS-AR .................... Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS .................................... American Cutoff, MS-AR ............. Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ............... Vancluse, AR............................... Island 84, AR-MS............ .......... Warfield Point, MS..................... Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS ........... 439 L 443 R 446 453 460 467 470 474 481 486 488 489 497 501 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 -- 912 L R L R R L R L R R L R L R R L L R R L L L 46 C! C. 5,127 18,605 7,650 Ct Ct In C OW 0 z 19,330 12,860 19,580 46,140 24,160 40,765 18,580 42,112 37,756 10,235 53,214 11,600 34,992 26,815 11,080 22,210 8,350 45,653 2,980 33,685 13,016 13,475 4,320 14,150 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Spanish Moss, AR .................... Tarpley Island, MS ........................ Miller Bend, MS ............................ Island 82, AR............................... Ashbrook Island, MS................... Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, A R ................................... Huntington Point, MS............... Pair O'Dice, AR .......................... Eutaw-Mounds, MS................. Cypress Bend, AR ...................... Catfish Point, MS ........................ Ozark, AR-MS........................... Prentiss, AR-MS............................ Rosedale Bend, AR ..................... Riverton, MS ......................... Klondike, AR................................ Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS........... Lake Concordia, MS..................... Big Island, AR ............................... Smith Point, MS ................. ...... Dennis, MS .................................... Cessions, MS ................................. 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 R R L R R R L R L R L R L L L R L L R L L L 1,823 ,- -- -- -- -- Total Revetment, V icksburg District, Mbississippi River ..... 4,825 (.91 Miles) -- 11,931 3,147 12,182 -- 1,504-739 (284 99 Miles) .. I , z 0 0 n C/a 0 0 z C r C 0 O r)r Cm r C N Oo �r 4,580 2,000 29,360 3,080 3,455 46,158 21,205 9,095 40,188 34,405 20,075 22,015 20,315 4,820 12,500 23,400 29,245 6,980 16,515 18.185 25,195 10,910 41,418 BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Opel Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior TI of R sion Lap FY Thi Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Lii Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Fe Dikes: (2) 3) Jackson Point, MS ...................... 330 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 Buck Island, MS ......................... 339 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 Opposite Warnicott Ldg., MS........ 352 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 Natchez Island, LA-MS ............. 358 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 Opposite Rifle Point, MS .............. 369 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 Rifle Point, LA ........................... 369 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 Waterproof Bar, LA................ 379 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 Spithead Towhead, MS .............. 386 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9 Browns Field, LA ....................... 388 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 Cottage Bend, LA-MS................... 389 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 Bondurant Towhead, LA ............... 394 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 Coffee Point, LA ........................ 405 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 Yucatan, MS............................... 410 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9 Togo Island, LA.......................416 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 Newtown Bend, LA................. 420 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 Diamond Cutoff, MS ............... . 423 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 Below Racetrack, MS .................... 430 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19 Racetrack Towhead, MS.............. 431 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 False Point, LA .......................................... 441 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 Marshall Cutoff, LA ................... 448 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 Below Grand Gulf, MS.................. 399 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 Fritz Island, LA .......................... 338 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 Forest Home Towhead, LA ........... 449 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 Willow Cutoff, LA ..................... 462 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5. Tennessee Bar, MS ..................... 465 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8. Arcadia Point, MS ................... 470 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9 Cottonwood Bar, MS.................. 471 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2, Point Lookout, LA ................. 478 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 rative hru s FY near eet) ,306 ,334 ),791 .608 ,214 ,197 ,580 ,681 ,557 ,049 O .029 ,925 ,010 ,256 O ,739 ,711 ,378 ,270 ,675 ,166 ,575 ,160 ,873 ,197 .166 ,463 ,406 751 TABLE 41-1 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: Ajax Bar, MS..................... Ben Lomond, MS .......................... Baleshed Ldg., MS ....................... Wilson Point, LA........................... Corregidor, MS .............................. Carolina, AR................... ......... Cracraft Lower, AR ....................... Cracraft, AR .................... Leota, MS .................................. Island 86, A R................................ Seven Oaks, AR............................ Walnut Point, MS .......................... Anconia Chute, AR ...................... Refuge, MS................................... Island 84, AR..................... Warfield Point, AR........................ Leland Bar, AR-MS....................... Leland Neck, AR-MS ................... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR................. Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS .................. .......... Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS ...................... ......... Ashbrook Cutoff, MS .................... Chicot Ldg., AR ............................ Catfish Point, MS ........ ....... Below Prentiss, MS ....................... Above Ozark, AR-MS .................. MaL\one AR .........F....i..e..l.d, 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 527 528 532 535 538 540 540 L L L R L L RR L R R L R L L L R L R 544 R&L 547 549 564 571 580 580 585 L&R L R L L R R (2) (3) .p t, 0o 0 00 x re O 7C 0 x 0 O n r 0 r) C 0 .q 0O D 28,152 24,667 15,721 8,423 6,730 2,897 10,329 3.809 7,571 18,477 5,829 4,725 7,159 19,695 12,475 2,020 15.086 4,315 10,478 13,646 13,015 8,728 22,381 5,290 12,413 5,545 7,549 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: Terrene, M S .............................. White River Landing, AR.............. Montgomery Towhead, AR ........... Victoria Bend, AR ....................... Smith Point, MS ......................... Island 70, MS ............................... Total Dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ........................ (2) 590 591 592 596 600 608 L -- -- R -- -- R -- -- R -- -- L -- L -- -- (3) 7,921 2,201 6,071 6,736 7,617 26,355 605,205 -- (1 14.62 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVER4 Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, AR.......................... Com o, AR....................... ............. Morgan Bend, AR ....................... Yancopin, AR ........................... Total Standard Revetment, Arkansas River ..................... Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ................... Morgan Bend, AR ....................... 31 34 R -- -- 36 L -- -- 24 R -- -- 31.540 (5.97 Miles) (2) (3) 30 R 36 L t .., r.. Ct C? 'rCn C It cr C 21 11,770 11,720 5,250 2,800 1i,848 3,658 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Above Operations This FY Non- Conflu- Construction Operative ence New Work Since Operative with Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru Miss. R sion Lap FY This FY River or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: Fletcher Bend, AR ........................ Total Dikes, Arkansas River ................................. ... RED RIVER 4 Standard Revetment: D upre, LA ......................... . ........ Bringol, LA ....................... ........ Egg Bend, LA ................................ Colonel Bend, LA.......................... Roxana, LA .............................. Ryland, LA ............................... Whittington, LA ........................... Smith, LA .................................... Latanier, LA ............................. Hudson, LA ......... ....... ......... Robert, LA .......................... ..... Alexandria Front, LA .................. Callahan, LA .................... ....... Cotton, LA..................... Rapides, LA .............................. Boyce, LA .................... .... Total Standard Revetment, Red Riv er ............................... (2) (3) 39 R -- 7,693 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (1.46 Miles) 69 R -- 73 R -- 75 R -- 77 R -- 83 R -- 88 R -- 89 R -- 91 R -- 93 R -- 99 R -- 102 R -- 105 R -- 110 R -- 116 R -- 119 R -- 125 R -- 1,800 ! 2,187 0Cri V 0 x "C 0 0 r3 0 Cr 7 m VM aa Cr C C C a a1 2,690 4,000 2,400 650 3,325 3,925 2,900 2,700 2,460 1,458 5,500 5,280 4,000 14,700 1,030 4,548 61,566 (1 1.66 Miles) TABLE 41-1 (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Above Operations This FY Non- Conflu- Construction Operative ence New Work Since Operative with Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru Miss. R sion Lap FY This FY River or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: 6 (2) (3) Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA............. 71 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ................ 73 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.477 Egg Bend, LA ............................. 75 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 900 Cologne Bend, LA..................... 77 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,850 Echo, LA ............ .................... 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,900 Richardson, LA .................... 79 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Alexandria, LA........................... 105 R -- -- - - - - - Bertrand, LA....................... 122 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,630 Dismal Swamp. LA ....................... 24 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,411 Total Dikes, Red River .................. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,868 (3.95 Miles) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Linear feet of dike which were raised. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. Includes all types of dikes and retards. Stone paving only. A MCE] C C] a" CA) CA) 0 2 TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Ope Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior TI of R sion Lap FY Thi Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Li Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) F MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Big Island, AR .... ............ .. 598 R -- -- .. -- -- -- -- Scrubgrass Bend, AR..................... 600 R -- -- -- -- ..-- Henrico, AR................................... 606 R -- -- -- -- -- 3 Cessions Towhead, AR............... 615 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 Island 67, MS ............................... 621 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9 Island 68 Bar- Knowlton, AR ............................ 622 R -- -- --.. -- - -- 26 Ludlow, AR.......................... 626 R -- .-.-. .- -- -- Rescue Land, AR-MS ............... 629 L -- -- -- -- - 2 Fair Landing, AR................. 632 R -- -- ---- -- -- 27, Burke Landing, MS ....................... 637 L -- -- -... - 19 Island 62, AR.......................... 638 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Island 63, MS ......................... 639 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 Island 63 Bar, MS.................. 639 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 Oldtown Bend, AR ................. 644 R -- -- -- 2,900 11,092 14,229 -- 26 Horseshoe, MS ....................... 647 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16 Westover, AR ........ ................... 650 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 15 Delta-Friars Point, MS ............. 665 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 Helena, AR ........................ 660 R -- -- -- --.. -- -- -- 36 Helena Towhead, AR ....... ....... 664 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 Trotters Landing, MS ............. 665 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 38, Flower Lake, MS................. 667 L -- -- -- 1,615 4,933 -- -- 16 St. Francis, AR ........................ 672 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 24 Harbert Point, MS ................... 675 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9 Walnut Bend, AR ..................... 680 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31 Mhoon Bend, MS ...................... 685 L 3,955 -- 8,762 -- -- -- -- 39 Peters, AR................................... 692 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33 Commerce, MS.. 695 L -- -- -- -- -- 29. rative hru s FY near eet) ,905 7,315 3,310 ,465 ),630 ,710 ),390 7,020 ,5152 ,070 ,030 ,514 ,795 1,860 1,385 ,640 ),090 1,460 ,690 6852 ,385 ,663 ,065 ,070 ,783 ,760 ,085 C 0 C25 C PC c a r C 01 'C ONE a .. 0-3 C ta 0Io TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Ope Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior TI of R sion Lap FY Thi Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Li Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) F Standard Revetment: Porter Lake, AR.......................... 700 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34 Pickett, MS-AR ....................... 703 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 Seyppel, AR................................... 709 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 Norfolk-Star, MS .................. 711 L -- -- -- -- -- 11,504 -- 39 Cow Island Bend, AR ................... 714 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN ............................. 716 R -- -- -- 1,945 6.122 -- -- 8 Coahoma, TN ........................... 717 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9 Ensley, TN .......................... 723 L -- -- -- -- -- 7,979 -- 46 Dismal Point, AR........................ 724 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7 Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ................... 730 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24 Presidents Island, TN................. 733 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12 Hopefield Point, AR-TN............... 736 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .......... 737 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31 Loosahatchie Bar, TN................... 740 R ---- -- -- -- -- -- 2 St. Clair, AR ............................. 742 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 Island 40, TN-AR ........................ 744 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30 Brandywine, AR-TN ........ ....... 750 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18 Shelby Forest, TN...................... 753 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9 Dean Island, AR ............................ 756 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7 Cedar Point-Densford, TN............ 759 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20 Chute of Island 35, TN .............. 764 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30 Richardson Ldg, TN ................... 769 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 Lookout Bar, TN ........................ 772 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 Lookout, TN............ .......... 774 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 Sunrise Towhead, TN .................. 776 R -- -- -- 870 2,831 -- -- 18 Driver Bar, TN.............................. 780 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 rative hru is FY near eet) ,155 2,575 1,830 ),505 ,274 4 3,623 ,270 1.256 7,200 ,530 ,755 ),360 ,293 6 ,070 ,930 ,750 , 0 10 ,545 ,555 , 190 ,930 ,415 ,990 ,005 ,440 .850 TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Lower Bullerton, AR .................... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN .............................. Osceola, AR...................... Osceola, AR .................................. Ashport-Keyes Point, TN .............. Kate Aubrey, TN .......................... Island 26, TN ................... Bend of Island 25, TN ................... Barfield, AR ....................... Obion-Tamm, TN ....................... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN........... Heloise, TN ................. ....... Island 18, M O ................................ Linwood Bend, TN....................... Blaker Towhead, TN ..................... Bells Point, MO............................ Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO........... Island 15, TN .................. .............. Hathaway Landing, TN ............... Robinson Bayou, MO ................... Fritz Landing, TN ........................ Lee Towhead, MO......................... Bend of Island 14, TN .................. Above Lee Towhead, TN ............ Little Cypress,MO ......................... 782 R -- -- 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 R R R L R R L R L R L R L L R R LL R L L L L 864 R A 6N 15,602-- .-- .-- -- _ 1,000 3,402 -- __ -- -- 7d 0r C ." 0 0 rE 0 Cr <-C n Cr -C 28,350 30,808 1,3503 5,823 44,232 2,500 15,690 32,385 52,335 53,831 29,764 15,770 30,490 14,850 18,562 5,420 25,600 3,630 1,000 22.630 15.670 9,640 15,830 4,943 40,140 TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Lower Bullerton, AR ..................... 782 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,350 Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ......................... 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,808 Osceola, AR................................ 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,3503 Osceola, AR............................. 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,823 Ashport-Keyes Point, TN .............. 791 L -- -- -- -- -- 15,602-- -- 44,232 Kate Aubrey, TN ........................ 793 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,500 Island 26, TN ........ ............ . 798 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,690 Bend of Island 25, TN .................. 803 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 32,385 Barfield, AR ............................... 808 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 52,335 Obion-Tamm, TN ....................... 819 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 53,831 Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN........... 826 R -- -- -- 1,000 3,402 -- -- 29,764 Heloise, TN ................................ 831 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,770 Island 18, MO ........................... 836 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,490 Linwood Bend, TN ..................... 841 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14.850 Blaker Towhead, TN .................. 845 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18.562 Bells Point, MO ................... 845 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,420 Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO........... 848 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,600 Island 15, TN......................... 851 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,630 Hathaway Landing, TN .............. 852 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,000 Robinson Bayou, MO.................... 852 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,630 Fritz Landing, TN ................... 857 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,670 Lee Towhead, MO...................... 859 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,640 Bend of Island 14, TN ................ 859 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,830 Above Lee Towhead, TN .............. 861 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,943 Little Cypress, MO ..................... 864 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 40,140 Ca CA Orv 0 Cr Cr C Ge TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Ope Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior TI of R sion Lap FY Thi Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Li Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' Feet) F Standard Revetment: Merriwether-Cherokee, TN .................. 88.6.9. .... L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 41 Linda, MO ................................. 876 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 Below Toney's Towhead, TN ........... ...................... ... 879 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 2 Toney's Towhead, KY-TN .......... 882 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 1 Kentucky Point, KY ..................... 887 L -- -- -- -- . 7 New Madrid Bar, KY ............... 888 R -- -- -- .. -- -- -- 1 New Madrid Bend, MO................. 889 R -- -- .... -- -- -- 43 La Forge, MO .................... 892 R -- -- -- -- - 24 Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY ............................ 899 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 Winchester Towhead, MO............. 900 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 Island 9, KY-TN........................ 905 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33 Milton Bell, MO........................ 908 R -- -- .. -- -- -- -- 1 Chute of Island 8, KY................ 913 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 12 Bend of Island 8, MO ................. 914 R -- -- -- -- -- -- - 39 Island 8, KY ............................... 914 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 Hickman-Reelfoot, KY .............. 919 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 Beckwith Bend, MO ................... 924 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18 Williams, KY .............. ............ 927 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 W olf Island, KY ............................ 934 R -- -- -- -- -- -- - 22 Columbus, KY ............................... 937 L -- -- .. -- -- -- -- 7 Belmont, MO............................. 938 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 Island 3 and 4, KY ...................... 940 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19 Campbell, KY ............................... 943 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 Pritchard, MO ........................ ..... 948 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 rative hru s FY near eet) ,058 ),000 ),895 3,640 ,960 3,825 ,262 1,930 ,520 ,540 ,585 ,600 ,620 ,945 ,515 ,399 ,203 ),015 ,495 .,395 ,785 ,970 ,865 ,045 Cx Ccr C 1< C O 7d 0 Cr Oc [.. n ,< n e3 7t1 TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Mayfield Creek, KY .................. Wickliffe, KY ........................... Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) ............................ Total Revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ....................... Dikes: H enrico, A R .................................. Below Knowlton, AR ... ......... Island 67, MS .......................... Below Ludlow, AR........................ Sunflower, AR............................... Island 64, AR.............................. Rescue Landing, MS ................... Island 62, AR........................... Island 63 Bar, MS................... Island 63, M S ........................... Kangaroo Point, AR .................... Friars Point, MS .............. ......... Montezuma Bar, MS .................. Montezuma Towhead, AR............. Prairie Point, AR ........................... Flower Lake, MS ......................... Walnut Bend, AR .................... St. Francis Towhead, MS .............. L L 949 953 958 3.955 (0.75 Miles) 603 616 621 624 627 630 631 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 681 671 R R L R L R L 8,935 16,150 29,927 -- 84,762 8,330 28,380 (8) 49,314 6 (6) 300 1,650 200 200 -- 2,051,918 (388.62 Miles) 9,080 20,670 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 2,530 23,180 2,600 5,640 6,580 6.870 17,970 6,700 10,391 11,060 6,390 3,380 I ON Cl, Cr CIr n C cr 02 TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Opei Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior T of R sion Lap FY Thi Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Lii Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Fe Dikes: (8) (6) Below Walnut Bend, AR ............... 676 R -- -- -- .... -- -- 8 Bordeaux Point, MS .................. 681 L -- -- --...... -- -- 10 Peters, AR.................................... 693 R -- -- --.. -- Commerce, MS..................... 694 L -- -- --.. -- -- Basket Bar, AR..... ............ 696 R -- -- --...... -- -- 5 Buck Island, MS .................... 700 L -- -- -- -- - 150 -- 4 Porter Lake, AR..................... 701 R -- -- ...... 23 Pickett, MS .............. .............. 704 L -- -- -- -- -- 10 Seyppel, AR ....... ... ............. 706 R -- - - --- Cat Island, AR ............................ 710 R -- -- -- -- 00 Coahoma, TN ............................. 718 L -- -- -.. 4 Armstrong, AR-TN....................... 720 R -- -- -- -- -- 1 Below Ensley, TN ............... 721 L 915 -- -- .... -- -- Dismal Point, AR..................... 724 R 1,990 -- 1,670 -- -- - 30 Engineers Bar, AR........................ 734 R -- .... -- -- 4 Hopefield Point, AR .............. 736 R -- -- -- .... 5 Memphis Front, TN ................ 736 L -- .... -- -- 6 Robinson Crusoe, TN ............. 738 R -- -- -- -- -- 21 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ............ 739 R -- -- .. -- -- 100 -- 3 Sycamore Chute, AR-TN............... 741 R -- -- --...... -- -- Above Loosahatchie, TN 742 L 1,650 -- 2,590 -- -- 150 -- 12 Redman Point, AR. ............... 743 R .. Randolph Point, TN ................ 747 L -- -- .... -- -- 6 Poker Point, AR...................... 748 R -- -- -- -- -- 200 -- 8 Shelby Forest, TN ................ ........ 751 L -- -- - -- -- -- 5 Corona Bar, TN-AR .............. 755 R -- -- -- -- 250 -- 9 Densford, TN ................................. 757 L -- -- -- -- -- 7 Cedar Point, TN..................... 759 L -- -- -- -- -- - 2 Below Richardson landing, TN ... 6................7 L5-- -- -- -- rative hru s FY near yet) ,840 ),730 ,830 ),745 ,810 ,705 ,115 ),080 .230 ,590 ,640 ,690 915 ),950 ,155 ,350 5,300 ,939 ,950 i,725 ,295 7,750 .940 ,060 ,540 ,400 ,780 .,890 ,950 -v 0 0 C Cr C lEl C tz '0 50 Cr n cr 0 "Cl TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: (8) (6) Lookout, TN-AR ......................7.7.1 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,865 Plum Point, TN ............................. 784 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,195 Lake Neark, AR .......................... 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.545 Island 30 ........................ 787 R -- -- -- -- -- 150 -- 5,485 Kate Aubrey, TN ....... .......... 791 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,270 Keyes Point, TN ......................... 791 L -- -- -- -- -- 925 -- 29,830 Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR .............. 795 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,330 Forked Deer, TN...... ............ 798 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8.550 Island 25, AR.............................. 804 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,450 Nebraska Point, TN .................... 808 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,149 Below Tamm Bend, TN.............. 813 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,300 Wrights Point, AR ...................... 820 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34.775 Island 21, Chute, TN .................. 824 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,170 Head of Island 21, TN ................... 828 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,540 Island 20, MO-TN ......................... 831 R -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 -- 21,969 Island 18, TN .............................. 837 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,670 Tennemo, TN......................... ... 842 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,240 Blaker Towhead, TN ................. 843 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,080 Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO................................ 844 R -- -- -- -- -- -- - 30,590 Opposite Carthersville. TN............ 846 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,300 Sandy Hook, TN ..................... 850 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,350 Island 15, TN .............................. 851 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,830 Robinson Bayou, MO .................... 853 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,768 Hathaway, TN ............................ 854 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,355 Island 15 Neck, TN.................. 854 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21.100 Above Lee Towhead, TN .............. 859 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,300 Below Cherokee, TN ................. 866 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6.230 Stewart Towhead, MO................ 871 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,440 Cccl Cc C 05 TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Operations This FY Non- Construction Operative Above New Work Since Operative Head Bank Exten- Reinforcement Prior Thru of R sion Lap FY This FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: (8) (6) Ruddles Point, MO................. 874 R -- -- -- -- -- 450 -- 8,130 Island 11, MO........................... 882 R -- -- -- - -- -- -- 14,330 New Madrid Bend, MO.............. 887 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 1,715 Kentucky Point, KY ................... 887 L -- -- -- -- -- 15,610 Morrison Towhead, MO......... .. .890 R -- -- --...... -- -- 1,070 Hotchkiss Bend, MO ............... 895 R -- -- -- -- -- 300 -- 14,208 Slough Landing, KY............... 896 L -- -- - -- -- -- -- 5,065 Below Island 9, TN..................... 901 L 3,130 -- 7,000 -- -- -- - 21,989 Donaldson Point, MO................ 905 R - -- .. - 3,950 -- 22,975 Island 9, KY .... ............... 906 L -- -- ......-- -- 7,010 Island 7 - Island 8, MO-KY ........... 917 R -- -- --.. -- -- 450 -- 14,795 Below Williams, KY ................. 925 L -- -- -- .... -- -- 3,640 Moore Island, KY-MO .............. 929 R -- -- -- -- -- 200 -- 7,925 Above Williams, KY .............. 930 L -- -- - -- -- -- 1,150 Wolf Island Bar, KY............... 933 L -- -- .... -- 12,260 Campbell, KY................................ 942 L -- -- -- ....-- -- 2,610 Pritchard, MO................................ 944 R -- -- .... -- -- -- 9,390 Island 1, KY ............................. 948 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,345 Total Dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River ................. 7,685 -- 11,260 -- 12,425 -- 981,583 (1.46 Miles) (I85.90 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Changed to correct previous errors. 3. Lumber mattress revetment. 4. Rock Groins. 5. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 6. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 7. Stone paving only. 8. Linear feet of dike which were raised. t 0 C tel tsl 1 a 0 -a D 0 r C tl 'I C3 PC TABLE 41-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Main Stem Levees Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District .. Levees ................ Old River structures and levees.. ................ Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ............... Levees.. ....... ........ Morganza structure and levee .................. Morganza forebay levee ...... Port Allen lock ............ Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees .................. Plaquemines West Levee District Levees ........... Buras Levee District ........ Levees .................. Empire lock .............. Baton Rouge front levees ...... Pontchartrain Levee District .... .... ......... Levees .................. Bonnet Carre guide levees ... Bonnet Carre forebay levee Bonnet Carre structure East Jefferson Levee District Levees ..... ............ West Jefferson Levee District Levees ........... . Floodwalls ............... Harvey Canal Lock ......... (16.8) (16.8) (--) (13.3) (--) (-- (--) (--) (--) (15.5) (--) (15.5) (--) 15.5 15.5 -- 12.0 -- -- -- -- -- 15.5 -- 15.5 -- 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 (126.3) (126.3) -- (1263) ) (1.0) (--) (1.0) (--) (118.7) (--) (118.7) (--) 118.7 118.7 -- 118.7 -- 1.0 -- 1.0 -- 118.7 -- 118.7-- 0.8 6.7 0.1 0.8 6.7 0.1 61.7 61.7 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 2.1 (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 11.6 (20.0) 19. 8 0.1 0.1 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 2.1 (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 0.8 -- -- -- ---- 6.7 -- -- -- -- -- 0.1 -- -- -- 61.7 -- 37.92 -- (27.8) -- 27.72 -- 0.1 -- 1.9 -- 0.1 (--) -- (--) (117.5) (3.8) -- 103.4 3.8 -- 11.3 -- -- 1.3 -- -- 1.5 -- 10.8 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 -- (--) (--) -- -- 0.1 (--) -- (--) -- -- -- 61.7 (---)-) -- -- -- 61.7 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 2.1 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 2.I (--) (0.1) (--) (--) (--) (110.8) (-- (110.8) -- ) 0.1 -- -- -- 110.8 -- 110.8 -- (--) (--) -- (--) -- (--) -- -- 11.6 (19.9) 19.8 0.1 (--) -- -- 11.6 (19.9) 19.8 0.1 (--) cr2 C!r Cr Cr Cz -I (--) TABLE 41-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru tinder for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Orleans Levee District Left descending, east bank Levees Floodwalls IHNC lock Right descending, west bank Levees Algiers Canal lock Lake Borgne Basin Levee District Levees Grand Prairie Levee District Levees Total Mississippi River Other Levees Included in Main Stem Louisiana State Pen Levee Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises East Bank Atchafalaya River Bayou des Glaises West bank Atchafalaya River Simmesport Ring Melville Ring Krotz Springs Ring Mansura Hills to Hamburg West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal Morganza upper guide levee (27.2) (13.3) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (13.9) 13.8 0.1 11.6 (27.2) (--) (24.9) (--) (13.3) (--) (11.0) (--) 4.6 -- 2.3 -- 8.6 -- 8.6 -- 0.1 -- 0.1 -- (13.9) (--) (13.9) (--) 13.8 -- 13.8 -- 0.1 -- 0.1 -- 11.6 -- 11.6 -- 37.4 37.4 -- 374 -- 511.6 511.6 -- 491.1 3.8 12.1 1.2 -- 11 -7- -- T-i- (--) (--) (--) --. (18.4) (--) (4.6) (--) 4.6 -- (13.8) (--) 13.8 -- -- _- -- 11.6 -- -- 37.4 -- -- 479.6 -- (18.4) (--) (4.6) (--) 4.6 (13.8) (--) 13.8 -- 11.6 -- 37.4 -- 479.6 -- -- 7.3 (--) --. (148.4) (148.4) (--) (143.9) (--) 52.5 52.5 -- 52.5 -- 7.9 7.9 -- 7.9 -- 60.1 60.1 -- 55.6 -- 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 128.7 56.5 8.9 1.6 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- 1.6 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- 128.7 3.5 110.0 0.9 56.5 8.2 8.9 -- 29.0 -- 8.9 -- (148.4) (--) 52.5 -- 7.9 -- 60.1 -- 1.6 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- -- -- -- -- 128.7 -- -- -- -- -- 56.5 -- -- -- -- -- 8.9 (148.4) (--) 52.5 -- 7.9 -- 60.1 -- 1.6 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- 128.4 -- 56.5 -- 8.9 -- t. 0 m Ir' C 0 - 0 C1 O t2 r 0 ao ID C 0a (-) -- ) (- TABLE 41-IC (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction East Protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ........... ............. 1061067 106.7 0.8 95.7 -- -- -- -- -- 105.0 -- 86.0 Total Atchafalaya Basin ............... 449.2 449.2 12 5 387.5 0.9 -- -- -- -- 447 5 -- 428.2 Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ....................... .... 461.3 449.2 12.5 387.5 82 -- -- -- -- 447.5 -- 428.2 Total-Main Stem Leaves .............. 972.9 960.8 -- 878.6 1. 2 -- 1.1 -- 927. 1 -- 907.8 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT L ake Pontchartrain, LA .................... (17.4) (17,4) (--) (17.4) (174) (--) (174) (--) Item A levees .... ....................... 5.0 5.0 -- 5.0 -- -- -- -- -- 5.0 -- 5.0 -- Item B levees........ ... ............. 10.1 10.1 -- 101 -- -- -- -- -- 10.1 -- 101 -- Item C levees.......... ................... .. 2.3 23 -- 2.3 - - 2.3 -- 23 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ................. .................... 17.4 17.4 -- 17.4 -- -- -- -- -- 174 -- 174 GRAND TOTAL ............................... 990.3 978.2 12.5 896.0 -- 1.2 -- 1 -- 944.5 -- 925.2 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Changed to correct previous error. cr CI Cr Cer PEN r. C O2l TABLE 41-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi .................. Greenville Harbor dikes .................. West bank in Arkansas ................... West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) ..................... Total Mississippi River L evees .................................... Other Levees Included in Main Stem Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees.................... Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees.................... ............... Arkansas River, South Bank ....... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ............ ............. Total-Main Stem Levees........... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank ......... Red River Backwater Levees ....... 178.34 178.3 7.8 7.8 75.6 75.6 -- 109.1 18.1 -- 7.8 -- -- 55.0 -- 198.7 198.7 10 78.7 12.5 460.4 460.4 10.6 250.6 30.6 (59.2) (59.2) (--) (59.2) (--) 59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 -- 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 144.6 144.6 -- 144.6 -- 605.0 605.0 10.6 395.2 30.6 61.55 263.6 56.2 -- 56.2 -- 237.3 12.7 219.7 12.9 156.9 -- 135.0 -- 61.3 -- 54.3 -- 91.0 43 74.9 -- 309.2 4.3 264.2 -- (--) (--) (--) (--) 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 333.9 4.3 288.9 -- 8.3 -- -- -- 8.3 -- -- -- 1742 -- 2.7 -- 75.4 -- 197.8 -- 450.1 -- (59.2) (-) 59.2 -- 84.1 593.4 -- 47.4 -- 249.0 -- 174.2 -- 2.7 -- 75.4 -- 197.8 450.1 (59.2) (--) 59.2 -- 81.1 140.3 590.4 47.4 -- 219.7 12.9 0 0xCt 1< 1 n 0 Ct y x 7dr 0 C 0 aa TABLE 41-L (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Yazoo River Basin ..................... 624 1) (425.3) (--) (237.6) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (624.1) (--) (3389) -- Headwater .............................. 527.5 373.7 -- 186.0 -- -- -- -- -- 527.5 -- 299 -- Backwater ..................................... 96.6 51.6 -- 51.6 -- -- -- -- -- 96.6 -- 390 -- Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... 949.2 718.8 12.7 513.5 12.9 8.3 83 -- 9205 -- 6060 129 GRAND TOTAL ...................... 1,554.2 1,323.8 23.3 908.7 43.5 342.2 4.3 297.2 -- 1,513.9 -- 1,196.4 12.9 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 5. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 6. Relief wells used in place of berms. -4 cr (In cr~L C Ct '2 TABLE 41-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm5 Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River M ounds, IL...................................... M ound City, IL......................... Cairo Drainage District, IL.............. City of Cairo, IL ............................. Little River Drainage District, M O ............................ Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO ....... ........ Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO ..................... St. Johns Levee and Drainage District, MO .................. ............... St. Francis Levee District of M O ................... .................. City of Hickman, KY ................... Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton, County, KY .............. Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN................ Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN ....................... Lake County Levee and Drainage District, TN ................................... Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1, TN ...... .............. Tipton-Obion levee extension ......... St. Francis Levee District o f A R ........................................... Helena Improvement District No. 1, AR ..... .......................... Cotton Belt Levee District N o. , ARX............. ........... 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 3,9 2.7 13.8 6.2 3.9 2.7 7.8 2.24 0.5 2.5 1.6 4.4 19.3 19.3 -- 19.3 -- 9.7 13.8 13.8 10.0 13.8 4.8 26.0 26.0 -- 26.0 -- 12.9 59.03 58.7 55.7 55.7 1.4 1.4 16.7 16.7 4.5 4.5 5.2 5.2 -- 58.2 -- 48.74 -- 1.4 -- 16. 7 -- 4.5 -- 5.2 -- 9.2 -- 23.0 0.5 2.5 2.0 -- 4.9 -- 4.8 -- 4.9 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 26.0 -- -- -- 46.9 -- 12.0 -- 55.1 -- 0.5 -- 15.1 -- 11.4 -- 16.3 -- 0.6 17.0 17.0 -- 17.0 -- 9.6 21.3 21.3 -- 21.3 6.5 -- -- -- 156.7 156.7 5.3 5.3 -- 153.2 -- 5.3 -- 1.3 -- 89.2 0.3 -- 9.4 -- 0.4 4.5 5.2 17.0 -- 21.3 -- 6.5 -- 88.4 -- 156.7 -- 2 4 -- 2.4-- 23.9 23.9 -- 23.9 -- 19.4 -- 19.4 4.7 -- 3.6 -- -- 1.1 -- -- 8.5 -- -- 3.5 -- -- 19.3 -- -- 13.8 - -- 26.0 -- -- 46.1 -- -- 55.1 -- -- 16.3 -- -- 4.3 -- -- 5.2 -- -- 17.0 -- -- 21.3 -- -- 156.7 -- -- 4.2 23.9 -- 23.9 O-I!N 0 m C c 0 0 0 cc C oi m1. 03 � TABLE 41-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County. AR.......... Laconia Levee District No. I of Deshna County, AR................... Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Deshna County, AR ......................... Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District, MS ......... ...... Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., A KY ......... ............. ......... --a Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee, M O ..... ........................ Total Mississippi River ............... TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES....... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River ............................... E ast bank ......................... ........ W est bank ..................................... Little River ................................. East bank (left) ......................... W est bank ....... .......................... Elk Chute .......... ........................ West Basin and middle valley......... Lower White River ..................... White River backwater levee........... Augusta to Clarendon ................. Clarendon levee ........................ 20.5 20.5 -- 18.1 18.1 -- 6.6 6.6 -- 93.6 93.6 -- 4.8 4.8 -- 20.5 -- 18.1 -- 6.6 93.6 4.8 -- 35.3 35.3 -- 35.3 - 637.8 631.0 10.0 607.5 -- 637.8 631.0 10.0 607.5 -- (308.2) (302.9) -- (302.9) -- 159.5 156.2 -- 156.2 -- 148.7 146.7 -- 146.7 -- (130.1) (130.1) -- (130.1) -- 40.7 40.7 -- 40.7 -- 35.1 35.1 -- 35.1 -- 39.9 39.9 -- 39.9 -- 14.4 14.4 -- 14.4 -- (95.6) (85.9) -- (84.1) -- 40.2 40.2 -- 40.2 -- 49.2 39.5 -- 39.5 -- 6.2 6.2 -- 4.4 -- 11.5 -- 11.5 12.6 -- 9.2 88.6 -- 88.6 23.8 -- -- 342.7 -- 272.6 342.7 -- 272.6 20.5 -- 16.5 -- 93.6 -- -- 4.8 -- = 35.3 -- -- 605.6 -- -- 605.6 -- (301.0) -- 156.7 -- 144.3 -- (128.9) -- 40.7 -- 35.1 -- 39.7 -- 13.4 -- (94.0) (--) 38.8 -- 49.2 -- 60 -- rC Cl Cl Cr Cr Cl Cl C 20. 5 16.5 93.6 4.8 35.3 596.6 596.6 (133.5) 94.7 38.8 (94.5) 40. 1 23.7 17.3 13.4 (81.0) 38.8 36.2 60 TABLE 41-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm5 Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Memphis Harbor..... ..................... 105 J -- 10.5. 7.0 -- 10.5 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project.................. ... 544.4 529.4 -- 527.6 -- 7.0 -- 7.0 -- 534.4 319.5 GRAND TOTAL............................... 1,182.2 1,160.4 10.0 1,135.0 -- 349.7 -- 279.6 -- 1,140.0 -- 916.1 -- 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee 4. Deficient in freeboard as a result of 1996 Revised Project Design Flood flowline. 5. Landside seepage berms only. i 6. Changed to correct previous error. --- Q C1 O 0 r a O wow C I1 1< O z ,< r O ,r O 'C C 1< tim � ,< TABLE 41-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berm s Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru [inder When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted F' FY struction pleted FY FY struction MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 41-K ................... .... Vicksburg District, Table 41-L........ Memphis District, Table 41-M ..... Total Mississippi River ................. Other Levees Included in Main Stem Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-- N O D ..................................... Louisiana State Pen Levee-- NOD ............................ Lower Red River-South Bank-- VXD .................... ...... Arkansas River-South Bank-- VXD ................ ..... ........... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem .................... Total Main Stem Levees ............. TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,--NOD......... Yazoo River Basin--VXD ............... Arkansas River-North Bank-- VXD ......................... Red River Backwater-VXD .......... St. Francis River-MD ................. 511.6 511.6 -- 491.2; 3.8 1.2 -- 1.1 460.4 460.4 10.6 250.6 30.6 309.2 4.3 264.2 637.8 631.0 10.0 607.5 -- 342.7 -- 272.6 1,609.8 1,603.0 20.6 1,349.3 34.4 653.1 -- 537.9 449.2 449.2 12.5 387.5 0.9 12.1 479.6 -- 450.1 -- 605.6 -- 1,535.3 -- -- -- -- -- 4475 -- 479. 6 450.1 596.6 1,526.3 428.2 -- 7.3 59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 59.2 24.7 -- 24.7 605.9 593.8 12.5 532.1 8.2 24.7 -- 24.7 2,215.7 2,196.8 33.1 1,881.4 42.6 677.8 4.3 562.6 17.4 17.4 -- 624.1 425.3 -- 17.4 237.6 61.5 56.2 -- 56.2 -- 263.6 237.3 12.7 219.7 12.9 308.2 302.9 -- 302.9 -- -- 84.1 -- -- 590.8 - -- 2,126.1 -- S-- -- -- 17.4 -- -- -- -- -- 624.1 8.3 8.3 47.4 -- 249.0 -- 301.0 -- 59.2 81.1 568.5 2,094.8 -- 17.4 338.9 47.4 219.7 133.5 12.9 A -4 cr V 'C 7d C C ,2 TABLE 41-N (Continued) RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Built to Approved Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees Grade and Section (Miles) (Miles) Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Little River--MD ............................... 130.1 130.1 -- 130.1 -- -- -- -- -- 128.9 -- 94.5 Lower White River-MD ................ 95.6 85.9 -- 84.1 -- -- -- -- -- 94.0 -- 81.0 -- Memphis Harbor--MD .............. 10.5 10.5 -- 10.5 -- 7.0 -- 7.0 -- 10.5 -- Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .......................... 1511.0 .265.6 12.7 1.058.5 12.9 15.3 -- -- 1472.3 942.9 12.9 Grand Total in Project .................. 3,726.7 3,462.4 45.8 2,939.9 55.5 691.2 4.3 577.9 -- 3,598.4 - 3,0377 12.9 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 3. 1996 Revised Project Design Flood flowline identified freeboard deficiences. 4. Changed to correct previous error. 5. Relief wells have been used in lieu of seepage berms in some reaches of the Miss. River Levees. 04 C m x PC Cd C O -4 C 0 C a Cr 2 IiI aa ,< y 13 Ct C v MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2000) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) Bayou des Glaises diversion channel 1938 6.0 -- 6.0 100 -- Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie 1946 92.6 -- 63.4 75 -- Charenton drainage and navigation canal 1939 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Wax Lake Outlet 1938 15.7 -- 15.7 100 -- Atchafalaya Basin Floodway 1933 244.2 -- 186.4 76 -- Morganza Floodway 1941 3.3 -- 3.3 100 -- Old River outflow channel 1956 8.3 -- 8.3 100 -- Old River inflow channel 1960 2.3 -- 2.3 100 -- Old River lock approach channels 1961 2.2 -- 2.2 100 -- Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 1958 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Teche-Vermilion Water Supply 1977 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure inflow channel 1986 1.9 -- 1.9 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure outflow channel 1988 0.9 -- 0.9 100 -- Caemnarvon Freshwater Diversion channel 1988 1.7 -- 1.7 100 -- 41-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River................................... 1947 199.1 -- 199.1 100 -- Quiver River...................... .............. 1947 69.6 -- 69.6 100 -- Deer Creek................................... 1947 7.0 -- 7.0 100 -- Steele Bayou ..................................... 1947 54.9 -- 54.9 100 -- Steele Bayou'..................... .... ............ 1965 71.2 -- 71.2 100 -- Main Canal...... ............... .............. 1959 21.1 -- 21.1 100 -- Main Canal 2 .. . . . ... . . .... . ... .. ... . . . ... 1993 26.7 -- 26.7 100 -- Black Bayou............................ .......... 1992 36.5 6.2 26.3 72 10.2 Big Sunflower River tributaries ...................... 1957 227.2 -- 227.2 100 -- Quiver River tributaries ........................ ............. 1960 35.4 -- 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater .................... .......... 1960 39.9 -- 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project............................. 1976 179.0 3.6 76.2 43 4.3 Coldwater River .................. ................................ 1941 54.6 -- 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal........................... ................ 1948 0.4 -- 0.4 100 Tallahatchie Canal..... ........... ........... 1940 74.8 -- 73.5 98 "" Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway................................ 1939 48.0 -- 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ............................. 1971 2.9 -- 2.9 100 Yacona River ................................... 1952 1.8 -- 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou .......... ...... ................ 1944 16.1 -- 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou .............................. 1934 69.0 -- 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou3 ........... .. ... .... . . . . . . .. ................. . -- 26.0 -- ---- Bear Creek Diversion ............. ........... ... -- 4.8 -- -- Lake Cormorant ................................ .......... -- 20.9 -- -- Hurricane Bayou ....... ............. ........ -- 2.5 -- -- Opossum Bayou ....................................... -- 20.8 -- -- Abaica Creek...... ................ . -- 7.7 -- -- Chicopa Creek........................... .. -- 7.0 -- -- Bear Creek ....... ................................. .... -- 23.3 -- -- Rocky Bayou.............................. ............ -- 7.8 -- -- Whiteoak Bayou............ ............ ... -- 55.9 -- -- Miscellaneous ditches ................. ......... -- 12.3 -- -- Yalobusha River.... ...................................... 1939 46.0 -- 46.0 100 Yazoo River ............................ ................ 1940 160.2 -- 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Channel............................. 1956 30.8 -- 30.8 100 Tchula Lake ............................ 1964 26.4 -- 26.4 100 David-Burrell Bayou.......................... .. 1957 40.4 -- 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou................................ . 1960 3.5 -- 3.5 100 41-82 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-P (Continued) CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2000) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS (Continued) Hillside Floodway................................... ... Yazoo City protection works......................... Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous.................. ..... Alligator-Catfish Bayou....................... ... Pelucia Creek ........................... ............ .. BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche........ ................. . ... Bayou Lafourche47 ..... ... ..... .... .......................... ... Big & Colewa Creeks....................................... Big & Colewa Creeks5 7... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tensas R iver........................................................ Tensas River6 .... .................. ... .. .. . . . . . . Boeuf River, AR and LA... .............. Fleschmans Bayou, AR........................ ...... Caney Bayou, AR ........................ . ... Canal 18, AR ........................ Big Bayou, AR...... Black Pond Slough, AR'........................ . ... Bayou Macon, AR and LA...................... .... Rush Bayou, AR.... .................. Canal 19, AR..... ................... Canal 43, A R ........................................................ Canal 81, A R ........................................................ Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff ........................ Kirsch Lake Canal............. ................ Canal 19 Extension ........ .................... lake Chicot Pumping Plant ........................... Mill Bayou...................................... RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Snsas Cocodrie Pumping Plant ...................... Mile Bayou, LA ........ .... ................... 1964 1953 1975 1973 1975 1949 1972 1947 1965 1947 1968 1953 1963 1964 1963 1952 1962 1959 1964 1957 1956 1957 1964 1955 1976 11.0 1.6 30.2 8.3 11.7 45.3 43.0 81.4 86.8 96.5 165.0 103.9 6.6 7.4 10.3 33.3 14.3 150.8 6.7 50.2 34.5 32.7 17.1 9.3 9.4 2.5 4.8 6.9 1.5 0.1 .2 11.0 1.6 15.1 8.3 11.7 45.3 4.4 81.4 51.5 96.5 61.0 103.9 6.6 7.4 10.3 33.3 14.3 150.8 6.7 50.2 34.5 32.7 9.4 2.5 4.8 -- 6.9 -- 1.5 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. . cludes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 7F. urther Work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district 41-83 100 100 50 100 100 100 10 100 60 100 37 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ............................. ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ....................... St. Francis River, MO and AR ............................ West Memphis Drainage, AR ............................. Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR ........................ Tyronza River, AR .............................. ............. L'Anguille River, AR ....................................... LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ..................................... Big Creek and tributaries, AR ............................. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ............... ......... ............. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) .......................... Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act)....................... Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN................ Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ................................ MS River Below Cape Girardeau: West TN tributaries (1948 Act) ..................... .......... Wolf River and tributaries, TN ........................... NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Nonconnah Creek, MS and TN ............................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Helena Harbor, AR (2) .. ... .... ... .. ......................... 1952 1963 1953 1951 1960 1939 (1) 1972 (I) (1) 1952 (1') 1974 1955 1961 1960 1990 1989 9.6 -- 9.6 100 298.9 638.5 19.8 28.0 12.7 95.0 231.5 103.8 41.7 34.3 9.3 15.8 19.7 225.0 24.7 298.9 573.8 19.8 28.0 12.7 100 90 100 100 100 -- 7.2 3 -- 34.3 100 3.0 19.7 3.2 93.0 -- 24.7 18.2 1.26 2.25 -- 1.26 2.25 100 1. Not started. 2. Data for Stage 1 only. 41-84 6.6 6.6 -, -- 19 100 41 100 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-R PUMPING STATIONS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Bayou Yokely Bayou Yokely Enlargement Centerville Ellerslie Franklin Franklin Enlargement Gordy Maryland North Bend Tiger Island Wax Lake East Wax Lake West Teche Vermilion Pointe Coupee TOTAL 489 568 332 136 144 144 238 136 52 75 1,008 496 1,300 6,61500 6,618 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1955 1963 1964 1953 1958 1978 1964 1957 1962 1955 1961 1965 1982 1983 1990 1990 1991 1992 1992 1991 1990 1990 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1991(A) 1991(A) 1992(A) 1993(A) 1993(A) 1992(A) 1992(A) 1992(A) 41-85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-S PUMPING STATIONS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Chauvin Bayou, LA 250 100 1994 1991 100 Bawcomville 270 100 1955 1992 100 1993 Jonesville 180 100 1952 -- -- Natchez Port 100 -- -- -- -- Wilson Point 50 -- -- -- -- Greenwood - Lee Street 90 100 1953 1952 ---- Greenwood - Wilson Street 67 100 1953 1952 -- Greenwood -Walker Lake 675 100 1949 1952 ---- Yazoo City 540 100 1954 1957 ---- Columbia 45 100 1939 -- -- Calion 200 100 1959 -- -- McKinney Bayou, MS 250 100 1962 1961 -- Lake Chicot 6,500 100 1987 -- -- Tensas Cocodrie 4,000 100 1986 -- -- Yazoo Backwater 10,000 -- -- -- -- Natchez Area 300 -- -- --... Bushley Bayou 300 -- Indef -- -- Bushley Bayou 20 -- Indef -- -- Sicily-HAHA Bayou 750 100 2000 -- -- Sicily - Fool River 300 100 2000 -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun # 1 10 100 1992 -- Pelucia Creek -Rising Sun #2 15 100 1992 -- - Pelucia Creek Pump 75 100 1993 ---- Below Red River 500 -- Indef -- -- Bayou Rapides 222 100 1936 -- -- Ouachita Parish, River Styx Bayou, LA 500 100 2000 -- -- Total 25,709 'This project has been placed in the inactive category. 41-86 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-T PUMPING STATIONS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 2000) Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Devall's Bluff 215 100 1949 1987 100 1989 Des Arc, Ark. 30 100 1954 -- -- -- Ensley 900 100 1966 -- -- -- DD #17, Station # 1 375 100 -- -- -- Huxtable Pumping Plant 12,000 100 1977 -- ---- Graham Burke 1,500 100 1964 -- -- -- Finley Street 100 100 1978 -- -- -- Dyersburg 26 100 1961 -- ---- Cotton Slough 50 100 1964 -- ---- West Hickman 190 100 1976 -- -- -- Cypress Creek 3,000 100 1944 -- -- -- Fairfax 53.5 100 1950 -- -- -- Goose Pond 110 100 1976 -- -- -- Marble Bayou 220 100 1952 -- -- -- Workhouse Bayou 520 100 1950 -- -- -- Nonconnah 1,620 100 1944 -- -- -- L&DD #3 Peafield 400 100 -- -- -- Treasure Island 150 100 1976 -- -- -- Lake No. 9 500 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 10th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 28th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #2 700 100 1981 -- -- -- Drinkwater Sewer 150 100 1979 -- -- -- May Street 5 100 1948 -- -- -- Cairo 22nd Street 37 100 -- -- -- Gayoso Bayou 1,500 100 1915 -- -- -- MudLae 200 -- -- -- -- -- Madison 25 .... Cache River 200 -- -- -- -- -- New Madrid 1,500 -- -- -- -- St. John's Bayou ,00 -- ---- TOTAL 27,406.5 Unknown constructed by local interest. 41-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 2000 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake Subtotal Memphis District: Cache Basin, AR Channel improvement Eastern Arkansas Region (Comp) Francis Blank Floodway Ditch General investigations Helena & Vicinity Helena Harbor, Phillips County Hickman Bluff, KY Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Inspection of completed works L'Anguille River, AR Little R. Drainage Mapping Memphis Harbor (McKeller Lake) Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS Mississippi River levees St. Francis River & Tributaries, AR St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid West Tennessee tributaries White River Backwater Whiteman's Creek, AR Subtotal Vicksburg District: Channel improvement General investigations Inspection of completed works Lower Arkansas River Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee Mapping Mississippi River levees Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Subtotal $ 4,737,615 4,737,615 5,848 12,700,826 4,815,893 85,366 1,481,951 8,609 -721,795 14,347 34,393 -15,933 2,385,287 10,928,822 4,241,212 552,896 191,847 39,187 36,748,726 9,276,350 22,320,132 87,865 729,736 372,911 1,194,948 $ 77,668 77,668 -. == 2,074,620 ,.o o� oo =� ,.� 3,195,406 9,744,569 2,913,192 2,074,620 647,789 �� 40,558,758 10,910,176 208,035 126,432 339.711 -- 385,166 27,538,566 1,537,133 7,625,204 4,182,243 35,794,642 31,474,992 80,234,762 49,877,193 41-88 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 2000 (Continued) Item Construction Maintenance Other New Orleans District: Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System B. R. Harbor Devil Swamp Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Bonnet Carre Spillway Channel Improvement General Investigations Inspection of Completed Works Louisiana Penitentiary Levee Mapping Mississippi & LA Estuarine Mississippi Delta Region Mississippi River Levees Old River Subtotal Total Federal Funds CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District Wolf River Reelfoot Lake TN & KY New Orleans District: Atchafalaya Basin Louisiana Penitentiary Levee Old River Mississippi Delta Region Morganza, LA to Gulf of Mexico Total Contributed Funds Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 19,474,693 7,013,045 12,759,797 8,707,427 -- 68,377 9,223,885 7,697,802 9,846,437 957,213 324,848 95,976 2,018,143 9,056,898 -- 254,092 284,626 395,227 1,326,346 4,241,946 64,945,025 28,810,190 1,543,457 181,928,512 123,983,756 4,343,533 29,615 -- -- 234,739 -- 2,000,000 -- -- 2,150,000 -- -- 83,283 -- -- 3,392,875 -- -- -- 875,890 -- 7,626,158 1,084,991 1.543,457 -- 181,928,512 131,609,914 5,428,524 41-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 2000 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,2000 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, AR Contraction works DeValls Bluff, AR Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal 57,184,031 57,11 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 1,076,520 178,925 8,692,791 231,215 1,450,337 18,736,432 6,521,543 1,723,620 12,426 1,998,766 39,546,054 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 1,076,520 178,925 8,692,791 231,215 1,450,337 18,736,432 6,521,543 1,723,620 12,426 1,998,766 39,546,054 2,764,605 125,074 1,972,183 826,235 4,664,515 2,864,516 7,070 1,531,021 172,950 3,980,000 105,660 2,350,201 '4,605 15,074 72,183 26,235 54,515 54,516 7,070 31,021 72,950 80,000 )5,660 50,201 84,031 41-90 . MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 2000 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 2000 New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet CarrelE Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Teche Vermilion Basin Water Supply Old River Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 34,506,000 292,274,000 387,917 14,212,198 1,258,916 540,838 2.701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 34,506,000 292,274,000 387,917 402,673,123 402,673,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 532,012,500 532,012,500 -- 579,462 579,462 -- 1,897,980 1,897,980 -- 2,477,442 2,477,442 -- 233,496,354 98,000 452,392,006 58,566,439 240,679,963 233,359,750 98,000 452,344,082 58,566,439 240,633,249 136,604 47,924 46,714 41-91 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 2000 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep.30,2000 Memphis District: (Continued) Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Hickman Bluff, KY Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek Recreation Facility Nonconnah Creek Environmental Enhancement Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS West Memphis and Vicinity Whiteman's Creek, Ar Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee Tributaries Helena Harbor Helena & Vicinity, AR Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN L'Anguille River Eight Mile Creek St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Floodway Eastern Arkansas Reg (Comp) Francis Bland Floodway Ditch Subtotal Vicksburg District: Mississippi River Levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Section 6 Levees Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot Pumping Plant Tensas River Red River Backwater: Below Red River 128,228 695 439,434 7,896,000 9,019,908 306,090,954 965,429 52,485,397 652,115 1,788,846 10,624,501 2,176,379 17,080,969 3,510,000 10,900 11,502 11,093,004 571,000 1,878,935 108,651 53,949,566 15,091,679 2,557,072 10,849,291 1,440,000 100,000 226,393 3,895,161 4,749,451 7,895,346 85,336 439,434 7,896,000 9,019,908 306,219,182 965,429 52,486,092 652,115 1,788,846 10,624,501 2,185,300 17,509,600 3,510,000 10,910 11,510 11,097,580 571,000 1,894,500 108,651 53,962,300 15,131,000 2,563,600 10,850,000 1,440,000 100,000 227,000 3,896,000 4,756,300 7,923,800 85,200 1,513,158,520 295,154,509 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 95,639,986 41,505,235 639,400 8,921 428,631 10 8 4,576 15,565 12,734 39,321 6,528 709 0 607 839 6,849 28,454 .136 913,781 1,512,244,739 479,624 294,674,885 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 95,639,945 41,505,235 639,400 41-92 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 2000 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 2000 Red River Backwater Levee, LA Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Ouachita River Levees Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin--Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater Rocky Bayou Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant Muddy Bayou Yazoo Backwater, F&WL Mitigation Yazoo Basin Reformulation Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam Subtotal New Orleans District: Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Miss. & LA Estuarine Channel Improvement: Dredging Revetments Louisiana Penitentiary Levee Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) 126,828.873 56,071,167 756,300 526,548,665 23,919,516 177,123,832 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 93,816,352 34,605,200 152,272,661 106,782,345 612,484 23,977,200 56,940,983 3,401,500 9,522,860 5,145,200 6,382,169 27,241,096 14,767,000 258,510,544 23,230,763 667,252 33 80,009 95,342 .- -- -- 93,048 100 481,575 12,021 -- 11,517 -- 32,990 9,331 806,674 704,556 4,237 127,496.125 56,071,200 756,300 526,628,674 23,919,516 177,219,174 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 93,909,400 34,605,300 152,754,236 106,794,366 612,484 23,977,200 56,952,500 3,401,500 9,555,850 5,145,200 6,391,500 28,047,770 14,767,000 259,215,100 23,235,000 2,322,700,628 5,008,008 4,577,600 35,945,266 1,050,382,417 10,508,000 18,056,600 2,319,822,828 5,008,008 4,503,088 35,945,266 1,050,360,618 8,707,427 18,056,600 2,878,346 74,512 21,799 71,200 41-93 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 2000 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,2000 New Orleans District (Continued): Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Mississippi Delta Region Atchafalaya Basin Floodway: Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River Navigation Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region (EP 309) Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal 200,680 366,868,000 83,518,920 868,531,317 303,463 79,813,220 2,523,731,491 6,362,068,081 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 2,095,000 29,700 200,000 229.700 69,753 1,109,000 965,247 2,144,000 200,680 366,821,755 82,764,456 868,108,511 303,463 79,787,148 64,245 754,464 422,807 26,071 2,522,296,392 1,435,099 6,356,840,856 5,227,226 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 2,095,000 29,700 200,000 229,700 69,753 1,109,000 965,247 2,144,000 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 4,468,700 6,898,549,282 4,468,700 6,893,322,056 5,227,227 41-94 - --- -- ---- - MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 2000 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 2000 RECREATION FACILITIES--COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Project Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing Subtotal Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Subtotal Total Eight-Year Program Funds Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies Total maintenance since Jul. 18, 1941 Total rehabilitation Total flood control emergencies Total general investigations Total flood control, MR&T appropriations Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), PP. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1999 2,405,300 203,286 2,405,300 203,286 2,608,586 2,608,586 -- 1.584,339 1,584,339 -- 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- 10,281,695 10,281,695 -- 6,908,830,977 6,903,603,751 5,227,227 3,248,427,563 3,371,666,082 745,237 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- 124,763,114 123,820,750 942,364 10,452,469,935 10,445,103,882 7,366,053 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- 10,484,538,844 10,477,172,791 7,366,053 41-95 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been excluded from this report. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-W COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30,2000 Mississippi River and tributaries (Regular Funds)' General investigations: Allotted Cost 4,380,000 5,382,000 4,555,533 4,298,200 124,763,114 4,213,085 5,272,270 5,075,113 4,343,534 123,820,751 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted Cost Maintenance Rehabilitations Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted Cost Allotted Cost Allotted Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed Cost 2,504,278 5,189,334 3,714,434 6,142,217 185,028,000 160,418,300 175,048,000 180,682,819 6,728,648,081 166,435,626 170,984,427 186,439,799 181,928,513 6,723,420,856 140,966,000 130,411,700 144,033,008 124,434,981 3,372,862,544 136,931,961 132,269,594 146,145,781 123,983,756 3,371,666,081 - - -- -- 31,113,000 -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 -- 14,885,992 -- 14,885,992 34,339,413 33,270,005 45,000 3,562,906 83,283 3,525,506 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 2000): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 2000 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: $6,898,129,509 10,281,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 124,763,114 3,372,862,544 32068,909 41-96 Maintenance Contributed Cost 250,827 39,617 186,720 382,013 135,000 141,739 $6,939,943,976 14,900,300 3,497,625,658 .884 - 7 I MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-W COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) Total Project Funding FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 2000 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 10,452,991,693 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 2000: 10.484,538.843 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 97: $330,374,000 FY 99: $323,636,541 FY 98: $296,212,000 FY 00: $309,416,000 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 1978, teletype. 41-97 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 41-X MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) FISCAL YEAR COST Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 110) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Morganza, LA to the Gulf of Mexico-012875 Subtotal Vicksburg District Mississippi Delta, MS-12803 Southeast Arkansas Feasibility - 12756 Subtotal Memphis District Reelfoot Lake, IN - 12394 Subtotal Total (Category 112) Flood Damage Prevention-Recon Study (113) 900 324 900,324 0 299 401 299,401 12,505 12,505 1,212,231 875,890 875,890 29,615 29,615 905,505 1,776,214 1,776,214 0 299401 299,401 42120 42,120 2,117,736 St. Louis District MS River, Alex City, IL - 010462 77668 New Orleans District Alexandria, LA to the Gulf of Mexico - 81308 Donaldsonville, LA to the Gulf of Mexico - 013510 Subtotal Memphis District Wolf River, Memphis, TN - 13157 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 113) Special Reconnaissance Study (115) Vicksburg District Spring Bayou, LA - 081338 TOTAL (Category 115) 525 295,036 29 295,561 295,561 40017 179,485 219 40,017 179,485 219,502 413,246 179,485 592,731 114,506 114,506 114,506114506 TOTAL (Category 110) 1 10 QOQ Il2A 0 00 ,R 4 9 1 J.77Ua I .JIVrT.-' 41-98 --- 77668 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-X MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (Continued) ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) FISCAL YEAR COST Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) New Orleans District - Surveys, Gages & Observations - 81900 Vicksburg District - Surveys, Gages & Observations - 81900 Memphis District - Surveys, Gages & Observations - 81900 TOTAL (Category 120) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (140) Memphis District Reelfoot Lake, TN & KY, - 012394 TOTAL (Category 140) PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) Memphis District Bayou Metro Basin, AR - 81307 Eastern Arkansas Region (Comp) - 081266 St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy - 077005 Subtotal New Orleans District Morganza, LA to Gulf of Mexico - 012875 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 160) GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 27,552 233,882 100,787 362,221 27,552 233,882 100,787 362,221 29,061 29,061 1,891,936 201 112 1,892,249 320,019 320,019 1,891,936 201 112 1,892,249 320,019 320,019 2,212,268 2,212,268 4,343.533 1:084990 5428.523 41-99 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BACKGROUND The research and development laboratories of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have served the Carps, the Army, and the Nation with technical accomplishments in a variety of engineering and scientific fields for 70 years. From beginnings in 1929 as a small hydraulics laboratory established to assist in developing a comprehensive plan for flood control of the Mississippi River to the 1999 establishment of the Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) consolidating the research and development efforts of the laboratories under the leadership of a single center, Corps' laboratories have been solving civil engineering and environmental quality challenges. ERDC offers a centrally managed center of eight laboratories that is the largest and most diverse civil and environmental research and development organization in the world. During FY00, ERDC had 2,031 employees of whom 1,064 were highly trained engineers and scientists. The professional staff encompassed 298 Ph.D.'s and 467 Masters' degrees. ERDC executed a Civil Works program totaling $136.1 million; of this total, $44.2 million was executed in direct allotted R&D Programs. The remaining $91.9 million was executed in support of USACE District and Division offices and non-Corps customers. LABORATORIES The diverse civil engineering and environmental quality research and development center consists eight of centrally managed laboratories located at Alexandria, VA; Champaign-Urbana, IL; Hanover, NH; and Vicksburg, MS. With world-renowned expertise and facilities, each laboratory adds a unique perspective and set of capabilities to the overall ERDC team. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory The Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory is the Nation's center for engineering and scientific research and development in the coastal, hydraulic, and hydro- logic engineering and sciences. Nationally and interdaionally recognized experts in the fields of rip-rap dsgn, navigation engineering, pump station design, fisheries engineering, sediment transport, estuarine engineering, dredging equipment, hydrodynamics, groundwater modeling, coastal storm protection, harbor design and modification, coastal and hydraulic structures, physical processes associated with water resources environmental problems, military logisticsover- the-shore, wave climatology, hydroinformatics, and watershed modeling perform research and sitespecific investigations. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory The Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) maintains the finest research and engineering staff and facilities in the world for the study of cold regions science and technology. CRREL's experience spans nearly 60 years, starting with the Boston District's Soils Laboratory work on frozen soils in the early 1940s. The creation of CRREL began in 1961 with the merger of the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory and the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Research Establishment. This merger put DoD's principal cold regions expertise in one place. The 1971 beginning of a long-term program by the Corps of Engineers to investigate ways of extending navigation on the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway throughout the winter also marked the beginning of Civil Works research at CRREL. As part of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Winter Navigation Demonstration Program, CRREL researchers investigated ice booms to impede the flow of ice into navigation channels. CRREL later developed various methods of keeping waterway locks ice-free, including the use of chemical coatings, saws for cutting ice from lock walls, and bubblers for preventing ice formation. Construction Engineering Research Laboratory The Construction Engineering Research Laboratory was chartered over 30 years ago to provide construction research that would address the entire spectrum of issues within military construction. This research is in support of sustainable military installations and encompasses construction, operations, and maintenance as well as environmental and safety concerns. These technologies have universal application 42-1 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER and are of extreme value in the Civil Works arena as well. Civil Works efforts historically have been in the areas of corrosion control, high performance protective coatings (including overcoating of lead-based paint), management tools for Operation and Maintenance optimization, and environmental sustainment. Environmental Laboratory The Environmental Laboratory is the acknowledged leader for conducting environmental quality research and problem solution involving the consequences of water resources development, navigation, regulation of wetlands and inland and oceanic water quality, management of natural and cultural resources, and cleanup of contaminated groundwater sediments and soils. For over 25 years, an interdisciplinary staff of peer-recognized professionals, augmented with the finest network of academic and private scientists and engineers in the country, have provided the environmental quality technology necessary to further the Corps' missions. Notable examples of recent accomplishments include wetlands research in support of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; natural resource management to guide Corps stewardship at projects; research to accelerate growth of desirable, non-problem vegetation; distribution of the first-ever expert system/information manual on using biological control agents to manage nuisance aquatic plants; and providing guidance to the field on controlling zebra mussel infestations using anti-foulant coatings (paints, thermal metal sprays, etc.), and continuous backwash filter systems for intakes that supply irrigation systems, water supply, and other low-flow requirements. Geotechnical Laboratory The 1928 flood control research and development work of the Hydraulics Laboratory led almost immediately to the need for soils research and prediction of the behavior of structures built on and/or with soil materials. Therefore, the Geotechnical Laboratory was established in 1931. The thrust of geotechnical engineering involves investigation, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of structures with, on, or in earth materials. Research addresses problems in areas such as soil and rock mechanics, foundation behavior, tunneling and trenchless technology, engineering geology, engineering seismology, engineering geophysics, earthquake engineering, pavement technology, mobility analysis and modeling, and trafficability studies. Information Technology Laboratory The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) was established in 1986 to provide research, development, testing, evaluation, and services for the Corps in information technology, computer-aided engineering, and computer science areas. ITL provides ERDC, the Corps, Army, and DoD with a variety of advanced information technology capabilities and expertise. ITL manages the first High Performance Computing Major Shared Resource Center to be formed under the auspices of the DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program; the Tri-Service CADD/GIS Technology Center; one of two CEEIS Processing Centers providing 60 percent of the Corps' MIS data processing, along with the Project Management over site of both Centers; one of the largest high-bandwidth, high-speed data communication networks in the world; the largest library in the Corps which is also one of the finest civil engineering libraries in the Federal Government; and the largest publishing and visual information facility in the Corps. ITL has recognized expertise in the areas of highperformance computing; application of CADD and GIS technologies to Army Civil Works projects and for installation facility management; computer-aided interdisciplinary engineering and analysis; computer science applications; software engineering; large relational database systems; high-speed communications; and scientific visualization. This expertise is applied to address problems in design, analysis, and management of projects and facilities to support the various missions of the Corps. Sensors and electronics are a major agent for change in the Corps' Civil Works program. ITL's Instrumentation Systems Development Division and CRREL's Engineering Resources Division provide support to research and development and application efforts requiring sensors, sensor-integrating software, electronics, and feedback-control systems. Structures Laboratory The Corps' Concrete Laboratory was transferred from Mt. Vernon, NY, to the Corps' Waterays Experiment Station (WES) in 1946. In 1983, WES combined the Concrete Laboratory and the Weapons Effects Laboratory into the current Structures Laboratory. Sole Federal responsibility for sampline inspecting, and acceptance testing of Portland cetien and pozzolan rest with the Structures Laboratory. It is 42-2 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 world leader in research on concrete materials and construction techniques, and the evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of civil works concrete structures. Other areas of expertise include phenomenology and effects of explosions, dynamic properties of soil and rock masses, and response of structures to a wide assortment of loading conditions, including seismic, penetration, and blast effects. Topographic Engineering Center The Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) provides new topographic capabilities in geospatial science to the Civil Work's community to ensure superior implementation of the nation's civil and environmental initiatives through research, development, and application of remote sensing, geographic information, global positioning, topographic, and information technologies. TEC scientists and engineers have developed faster, more accurate, and cost-effective ways to use remote sensing technologies to describe, characterize, and analyze the surface of the earth. Remote sensing technologies form an essential part of a new national approach to infrastructure engineering and environmental management. Remote sensing tools can accurately characterize different surface conditions, including certain types and conditions of vegetation, soils, and surface water, and with further development, will provide support in an effort to monitor change in the biosphere. These tools Provide indicators for the location of point and nonpoint pollution sources as well as advise of impending negative or positive trends. The extensive development of remote sensing technologies for use in construction, environmental rehabilitation, and resource management offer operational tools needed to increase capabilities to accomplish tasks otherwise not feasible, while at the soae time performing existing tasks rapidly, accurately, and at the lowest possible cost. ARMY CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAMS efforAts rcmoyv erC viviritlu alWlyo trhkes enrteisree arscphe ctraunmd odf etveeclhonpomloegnyt andproblem areas in the Army's Civil Works arena. aterials and Structural Engineering Research Area The focus of the Materials and Structural lcgineering research area is to provide new or eanced technologies to extend the life and reduce ccle costs of Corps' Civil Works facilities in an environmentally friendly and sustainable manner. These technologies are produced by aggressively developing high-performance materials and systems, with major emphasis in reducing rehabilitation and maintenance costs; refining material characterization; and improving analytical procedures to assess the adequacy of aging facilities and design/analyze rehabilitation measures. The research will furnish the Corps with improved analysis technologies to ensure a continued high level of safety and reliability, technologies to more economically design and construct required remedial and rehabilitation improvements, and technologies to conduct this work with minimum ecological impact, positive environmental support, and using sustainable methods and materials. The results of R&D efforts are posted on the web to assist rapid dissemination and updating as progress is made. High-Performance Materials and Systems Research Program. This program is developing new and improved materials and technologies that will enable the Corps to significantly reduce project delivery times and operations, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs. Procedures for materials selection and mixture proportioning for a family of low-cost, highperformance concrete have been developed. Field placement and mix design for grout enriched rollercompacted concrete construction has been advanced to improve the water-tightness and visual attractiveness of exposed surfaces for this low-cost, rapid construction method. A current practice report on controlled permeability formwork for concrete structures was completed. A range of concrete repair scenarios was established for Corps structures and analytical studies were initiated to evaluate the relative importance of those interrelated material properties that affect the dimensional compatibility of concrete repairs. The performance of commercial coatings applied to damp metal surfaces was evaluated, and guidance was developed on containment structures for use at Corps hydraulic structures during painting. Methods to assess the condition of aged, lead-based paints were developed, and the variables affecting the over-coating of these aged, lead-based paint systems were determined. A survey of commercially available, environmentally acceptable lubricants was completed and their potential for Corps of Engineers use was determined. Candidate sheet pile designs were developed which take advantage of the unique properties of fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Geotechnical Engineering Research Program. This program is driven by needs for less costly, more timely flood protection, navigation, and storm damage reduction. Erosion of spillway channels was identified 42-3 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER as a major concern; this has led to high priority research to accurately predict erosion and develop methods for reducing this costly storm damage phenomenon. The need to reduce real estate acquisition costs and provide timely flood control structures has created the need for guidance for design of innovative structures built with man-made materials or embankments with reinforcements so that steeper embankments can be built on marginal foundation materials in less time. Development of applications guidance for trenchless technology is being driven by the need to reduce interruption of service and impact in environmentally sensitive or highly urbanized areas, reduce operations and maintenance costs, and provide services to partners. This family of technologies can provide non-disruptive solutions for seepage control, drainage, and raw water intake pipelines for municipalities that partner on Corps reservoir projects. The Geotechnical Engineering Research Program has vigorously pursued an initiative to develop risk and reliability based methods for analysis of levee and earth dam safety. This effort is aiding decision-makers in rationalizing expenditures of scarce resources to upgrade or rehabilitate older structures. The Analytical Model Development efforts are providing designers with greater confidence in developing measures to ensure the safe performance of structures subjected to large deformations and severe loading conditions. Program accomplishments include a new empirical procedure for quantifying spillway erosion potential; preliminary guidance for allowing microtunneling beneath and through structures such as levees; advancement of soil material modeling techniques to three dimensions; development of "block cutting" software essential for numerical modeling of rock masses with appropriate, representative joint spacing, orientation, persistence, and fracture properties. A probabilistic procedure for liquefaction evaluation was developed and preliminary risk charts were developed for all 40 embankment dams prioritized as to their dam safety deficiencies. A procedure was developed and implemented to prioritize the 40 embankment dams on the dam safety deficiency list for seismic safety studies. This prioritized list is being used to make funding decisions for dam studies. The innovative flood fighting work has evolved into the basis for a new direct allotted program including not only geotechnical levee issues but also emergency management issues. A study investigating clay shale foundations is addressing an immediate deformation problem at Oahe Dam, and has already provided better quantitative information for assessment of deformations in such foundations. These clay shale foundations led to the failure of Ft. Peck Dam during construction as well as the downstream slide in Waco Dam during first filling. Concrete and Structural Engineering Research Program. This program emphasizes the development of efficient concrete and structural engineering technology to significantly reduce construction and rehabilitation costs and to improve the durability, service life, and safety of the Corps hydraulic structures. This is the only Civil Works program that directly addresses R&D needs for steel structures. This program provides the advances to update the Computer Aided Structural Evaluation system used nationally and internationally for policy compliant design in district offices and by private industry for contract Corps work. New guidance has been developed in the field procedures for repairing steel structures by welding. New technologies are being developed in the areas of computer-aided analysis of welds and equipment and procedures for the testing and evaluation of concrete. Research on welds has provided designers with new guidance on both fabrication and repair welding of hydraulic steel structures. This new guidance will extend the life and eliminate maintenance welds that have resulted in fatigue and fracture of the Corps' existing steel hydraulic structures. Cost-effective advancements in concrete technology are developed to improve the overall performance and increase their durability, thus reducing life-cycle costs of the Corps concrete structures. Actual field exposure studies have been in progress for over two decades and continue under this program to assess the durability of concrete when exposed to natural extreme weathering. New computer-aided analysis tools were developed for the design of pile foundations, nonlinear incremental structural analyses of concrete structures, design of steel members in tainter gates, and layout of concrete arch dams. Risk Analysis for Dam Safety Research Program. This program was a major new initiative in FY99 to aid in allocating investments to improve the safety of Corps' dams. All Federal and state agencies responsible for the design, construction, operation, or regulation of water resource projects have recognized the need for making sound investment decisions regarding dam safety. The USACE is responsible for managing risks for its 569 dams and protecting the public against the devastation caused by such catastrophes. While many of the USACE civil works projects have not been subjected to their maximum design conditions, 65 of the Corps' dams have been identified as being hydrologically or seismically defticient. The cost associated with correcting these defi ciencies may be as high as $6.5 billion. There is an increasing emphasis within the Executive Branch and Congress on having all Federal agencies present their annual programs and budgets using a riskbased approach. The development and implementationofrisk 42-4 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 analysis methods will enable the Corps to: prioritize dams requiring initial investigations and subsequent analyses; prioritize funding for critical repairs, rehabilitation, or modifications; select and justify the optimal plan to protect human life, reduce property damage, and mitigate environmental damage; minimize the disruptions of service; and maximize effectiveness of infrastructure investments. A multi-agency, multinational workshop was held to evaluate the current use of risk analysis for dam safety and provide an assessment of the USACE planned research program to ensure it will meet USACE's future needs. Several demonstration projects were conducted to document the development and fine-tuning of risk analysis procedures for a single dam site and for a regional portfolio of dams. This process also develops a cadre of Corps personnel experienced in execution of these engineering risk studies. Earthquake Engineering Research Program. In spite of major advances over the last 35 years, serious gaps in our knowledge base still exist in the areas of earthquake hazard predictions; site characterization for seismically sensitive parameters; constitutive behavior and material properties of rock, soils, and composite (reinforced) materials under seismic loads; and the stress and deformation responses of sites and facilities to seismic loading. Economical remediation and defensive design techniques are needed in addition to careful calibration of fast advancing numerical methods to actual field performance. In order to address these issues, this program is producing design tools and criteria that incorporate innovative measures for increasing the seismic safety of Corps and other public facilities. A potentially significant breakthrough in liquefaction analysis of soils was observed in this program. In centrifuge experiments it was observed that liquefaction, defined as dynamically induced pore water pressure increase equal to the vertical effective stress, cannot occur at confining stresses greater than 3 atm. This finding significantly reduces the extent and cost of remedial construction needed to assure seismic safety for embankment dams. A concentrated effort is in progress to engage the professional community in review and cooperative work on this breakthrough. Post-earthquake reconnaissance trips to Japan, Mexico, Turkey, India, and Taiwan provided outstanding new informnation about liquefaction of silty soils, and Performance and failure of embankment and concrete dams. Another earthquake hazard that is often ignored was observed, namely fires fueled by escaping flammable gases from natural deposits (such as Samps). Expulsion of gases from man-made deposits (such as landfills) was reported during the Northridge earthquake in CA, but no fires were observed at the time. In addition, guidelines were improved on the application of numerical and constitutive models for seismic analysis. Computer tools were developed to enable transfer of state-of-the-art procedures to District Offices. Navigation Systems Area The Corps of Engineers' navigation mission is to provide safe, reliable, efficient, effective, and environmentally responsible waterborne transportation systems (channels, harbors, and waterways) for movement of commerce, national security needs, and recreation. The U.S. Marine Transportation System (MTS) consists of over 300 ports, 1,000 harbor channels, and 25,000 miles of navigation channels, and is an integral part of both the U.S. economy and national security system. The MTS contributes more than $700 billion per year to the gross domestic product, produces $150 billion per year in federal taxes, and employs more than 13 million people. It supports rapid deployment of military forces and movement of equipment and supplies from strategic ports. Despite its importance, the MTS is under serious strain. The Congressionally-mandated interagency MTS task force and maritime industry report that commercial navigation will double by 2020; yet the MTS is already operating at near-full capacity in many areas and is being challenged by new vessel designs and traffic loads which exceed its channel, harbor, and lock capacities. Eighty-three Corps' locks are older than their 50-year design life, and 11 of them are over 80 years old. In light of these pressing national needs, this research and development area provides tools and technology for the Corps of Engineers to improve the navigation system's functional performance, preserve and enhance environmental quality of our waterways, reduce unit costs, and improve safety. Specific objectives of this research thrust area are to develop engineering technologies that increase the effectiveness and reduce the per project costs of harbor and channel projects that provide deep-draft and shallow-draft navigation for domestic and international commerce. Engineering tools, computer models, and design guidance are developed for defining and managing water levels and currents that affect navigation and sedimentation, waves that impact coastal structures and drive sedimentation processes, sediment that settles in navigation channels and harbors, and vessel transits within navigation channels and structures. Engineering tools, computer models, and design guidance are developed to enable rapid and economical navigation facility design, construction, repair, and rehabilitation. The program balances efforts on critical present-day 42-5 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER problems facing the Corps of Engineers with those that prepare the Corps to meet U.S. navigation system needs of the future. During FY00, the programs in this research area produced many accomplishments, several of which are highlighted here. Bendway weir training structure design guidance was developed. These structures have resulted in millions of dollars of savings from reduction in dredging requirements, improved navigation efficiencies, improvement in navigation safety, reductions in traffic delays, and numerous environmental benefits. Bendway weirs' effects on navigation were evaluated for various design parameters, including spacing, height, length, and angle. Guidance for design of navigation channels used by mixed fleets of shallow- and deep-draft vessels was developed. With increasing vessel drafts and continued improvements in bulk carrier and intermodal transportation efficiencies, more accurate channel design guidance will enable greater capacity in existing navigation channels. Generalized design guidance on the layout of approach conditions to locks that will reduce delays and increase capacity was produced. Improvements to lock approaches have a high potential for reducing traffic delays on the inland waterway system and increasing the capacity of existing locks. Wave and littoral transport models were improved, with more realistic physics incorporated and a standard graphical user interface adapted for their use. Extensive field data sets were used to improve the models' formulations and prove their reliability. The coastal Sediment Budget Analysis System was fielded and a Diagnostic Modeling System for coastal channel sedimentation problems was put into trial use on several projects. These tools will collectively provide the Corps with more effective management of coastal navigation projects with less impact on adjacent shorelines. Innovations for Navigation Projects (INP) Research Program. The program was established to aid districts in their efforts to provide innovative approaches to construct navigation projects. The objectives of this multi-laboratory, multi-discipline program are to identify and develop technologies and methods to reduce construction time and cost and minimize disturbance to navigation and the environment during construction. The focus is on technologies for Lift-in, Float-in, and In-the-Wet construction. This will include designs for new filling and emptying systems for locks, the use of alternative construction methods, underwater construction with pre-cast concrete elements, underwater concrete placement techniques, construction of foundations under water, quality-assurance/quality-control techniques, design of innovative lock walls for a barge gate impact load, innovations for lock gate operating equipment, and contracting procedures for innovative designs and construction methods. Criteria will be provided for enhanced construction materials such as controlled, low-strength materials for backfill, underwater concrete for foundations and filling pre-cast modules, lightweight concrete for Float-in construction, and connections and seals for joining pre-cast elements and modules under water. During FY00 guidance and technologies were developed for design, construction, and repair, including final guidance for the design and use of precast, thin-wall panel components for navigation structures. Soil-structure interaction studies were performed on flexible retaining walls with multiple rows of anchors. Interim guidance was developed for the design and construction of connections and seals for large precast concrete modules. Interim guidance was developed for selection of methods and techniques to position and stabilize equipment/modules to allow positioning and placement of large float-in and lift-in precast sections within allowable tolerances. Concrete mixtures were evaluated using water quality rating procedures, and a report documented performance requirements, materials selection, proportioning, and water quality. Installation of float-in units for construction of dams was evaluated in field applications. Investigations were completed that are needed for updating design criteria for use on the construction of lock floor slabs and culverts underwater. Individual components of the in-chamber longitudinal culvert design for lock filling and emptying systems were evaluated to find ways to improve the efficiency of the system through modification of these components. Flood and Coastal Protection Area The Corps of Engineers' flood and coastal storm damage reduction mission is to provide safe and reliable projects for reducing the damages to property and the vulnerability of loss of life for both inland and coastal flooding. The Corps maintains over 8,500 miles of levees and operates 383 major lakes and reservoirs to reduce flood damages. In spite of the completed projects and in-place infrastructure there remains over $4 billion in flood damages annually. The overall objectives of the research in this area is to develop neW flood and coastal storm damage reduction technolaies to enhance the effectiveness of projects, innovative techniques to reduce flood and coastal storm 42-6 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 and allow the integration of analysis tools to accelerate the study and design process. Engineering tools, computer models, and design guidance are developed for riverine flood analysis, channel restoration evaluations, improvements in ice engineering, and evaluation and improvement of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling. During FY00, the programs in this research area produced many accomplishments, several of which are highlighted here. The capabilities of hydrologic and hydraulic models (HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS, HEC-RES, and HEC-FIA) were expanded. Improvements to these software packages have improved the analysis techniques for flood damage projects and initiated the integration of GIS technology into the design and analysis process. Guidance was developed in draft form for restoration of channels using vegetation. This has a high potential for incorporation into urban flood damage reduction projects throughout the U.S. The Corps Water Management System (CWMS) was fielded in beta version to selected sites. The CWMS integrates the hydraulic and hydrologic software in a manner that allows flood forecasting and decision support for flood damage areas. Evaluation and analysis of grade control structures was initiated. Channel degradation is a common problem in urban and rural streams throughout the U.S. and guidance is needed by the design engineers to implement the most appropriate type structures for the inposed problem. Cold Regions Engineering Program. The Cold Regions Engineering Program focuses on alleviating problems from winter weather that impact Corps avigation and flood damage reduction projects. Ice formation and breakup in rivers and lakes impedes navigation, causes flooding, and adversely affects navigation, flood control, water supply operations, and ilictures. Winter conditions also impact the hydrologic cycle, fisheries, and aquatic habitats. The program addresses the impact of ice on inland navigation project operation and maintenance, severe ice jams and related floods, ice hydraulics and damage to shorelines and structures, and hydrology and water resources in Cold regions. In FY00 the Ice Jam Database, now containing more than 12,000 entries was enhanced for use by Corps districts in response to emergency situwions through a new on-line search and submittal aPability available via the Internet. Ice jam emergency Perations and mitigation were also addressed through Volvement in the design and implementation of National Weather Service Web-based ice jam monitoring systems at the Northeast River Forecast Center, and Glasgow and Missoula, MT. The Ice motion detection system was monitored and tested at remote installations, utilizing solar power and cell phones. A remote system to monitor pressure distributions at an ice jam toe was developed. An automated method to combine open-water and iceaffected stage-frequency curves for use in risk and uncertainty analyses was developed and applied. Guidance on engineering considerations for dam removal in ice-affected rivers was prepared. The discrete particle computer simulation program developed to model ice transport in rivers and in lock approaches has been enhanced for continued application in the design of river ice management and control methods. Guidance on flow control to manage river ice was prepared. A literature review of deicing techniques, including low-adhesion paints, coatings, and materials at locks and dams, was completed and compiled in a technical report. The river ice-forecasting model was applied to, and verified against, actual winter conditions. Environmental Quality Research Area The Corps operates and maintains 25,000 miles of inland and coastal waterways, 235 navigation locks, 114 major ports, 442 lakes and reservoirs, 73 hydropower projects, 879 flood control projects and annually manages the dredging and disposal of 350,000 cubic yards of dredged material as part of its water resource mission. Wide-ranging environmental stewardship is an integral part of Corps water resource management. Moreover, recent U.S. figures have estimated $16 billion per year in damages caused by non-pointsource pollution and up to I billion tons per year of eroded soils that are deposited in the Nation's waterways severely impacting multiple project uses and impeding navigation. A critical part of this mission is to ensure that project planning, construction, operation, and maintenance, while economically viable, incorporates environmental stewardship and restoration. The Environmental Quality Research Area addresses the highest priority technical problems with state of science, cost-effective technologies for managing natural resources at Corps projects including identifying, assessing, and managing contaminated dredged material; wetlands restoration; managing the Nations' threatened and endangered resources; and assessing and managing project-related water quality and quantity problems. This program will provide demonstrated economical solutions to the Corps' highest priority environmental problems, will reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens, and provide a very high return on taxpayer investment. 42-7 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Water Quality Research Program (WQRP). The WQRP conducts research on water quality problems for all Corps inland reservoir and waterway projects, providing cost-effective methods, applications, and guidance for problems related to managing project water quality. The direct application of technologies developed through research in the WQRP have resulted in improved water quality at Corps projects, reduced costs of required monitoring, and new and better predictive capabilities. In FY00, the WQRP developed guidance for improved understanding of environmental processes resulting in heterogeneous ecological and water quality responses, improved methods for water quality monitoring data collection, and techniques for collecting water quality information for incorporation in geographical assessments or as model input. An expanded Corps watershed modeling system developed by the WQRP was verified. This technology enables selective assessment of land use effects on water quality in Corps projects on a larger, more "real-world" scale than before. Long Term Effects of Dredging Operations (LEDO) Program. The LEDO Program provides new or improved technology to predict long-term environmental impacts and to identify, assess, and manage contaminated sediments. The technology allows the Corps to meet its dredging constraints and environmental compliance in a manner that is technically sound while reducing or eliminating unneeded constraints. The program research supports a risk-based approach in managing contaminated sediments. LEDO provides technology for identifying, assessing, and managing contaminated sediments in support of cost-effective navigation and restoration. Specific LEDO research thrust areas are: development of testing, evaluation, and modeling procedures for volatile contaminant losses; application of population dynamics models for toxicity interpretation; consequences of bioaccumulation of toxic substances; application of a marine chronic/sublethal assay; and organic matter effect on toxics' bioavailability. Future work will include screening tests for contaminant bioavailability, biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, development of genetic screening tools, and toxicity of endocrine disrupting compounds. LEDO implementation tools and techniques include the technical assistance program (DOTS), the dredged material management and assessment training effort of the DOTS Program; technical notes and lecture material suitable for training; EPA/Corps regulatory manuals; detailed guidance documents; and an interactive World Wide Web site. The program continues to upgrade and support a national bioaccumu. lation database to make certain that contaminated sediment information is available to a broad audience. As designed, the program continues to have direct programmatic input to the development of the EPA/Corps Testing Manuals for dredged material. Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (EMRRP). The goal of the EMRRP is to provide state-of-the-art science and engineering technologies and guidance for the Corps to use to predict, evaluate, and reduce environmental impacts resulting from Corps water resources projects. The EMRRP also provides tools to design, manage, and maintain restoration and development projects on streams and riparian ecosystems. The EMRRP investigates: a) rapid/cost effective quantification and assessment methods, b) design and construction specifications for wetlands/streams/riparian restoration activities, c) capabilities to predict ecosystem impacts, d) habitat restoration techniques for species of concern, e) ecosystem management and decision support systems, and f) basic ecosystem processes. Products in FY00 include the completion of a Special Technical Note Series on Stream and Riparian Restoration and Management. These documents provide clear, concise guidelines for engineers and planners involved in stream and riparian restoration and management projects. They also ensure compliance with legislative and policy requirements, while providing direction on the best management practices for restoration projects. Guidance has also been provided on contract specifications and performance standards for wetland restoration and creation projects. A "how-to" document was prepared that provides guidelines for developing wetlands erosion protection structures in coastal systems. Work is near completion in the development of national and regional guidance documents to improve the Corps' ability to assess functions of wetlands in the context of regulatory, planning, ad mitigation requirements. The wetland types being addressed include depressions, fringes, flats, and slopes. This procedure has multi-agency acceptance and cooperative funding. Reports were completed on a variety of manage ment practices, e.g., moist-soil management, ripatan zone management, bottomland hardwood managemidl and special management practices for Neotropcais birds, bats, reptiles, and amphibians. Much of this work has been incorporated into Corps training courses 42-8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 An on-line website was established with life histories and potential impacts to selected sensitive species and thehiabri tats by Corps reservoir operations. Efforts are near completion in the development of a computer-based decision support I information retrieval system, Ecosystem Management and Restoration Information System (EMRIS), that will allow rapid access to tools and information on a variety of environmental analyses and ecosystem management strategies. The topics to be addressed include: a) engineering aspects of environmental compatibility, b) threatened and endangered species, c) invasive species issues, d) legal ramifications of environmental projects, and e) the analysis of various ecosystem functions and values. Geospatial Technology Area The Geospatial Technology Area comprises Survey and Mapping, Remote Sensing, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Activities within this area focus on collection, management, analysis, and exploitation techniques for information tied to the earth's surface and subsurface (geospatial data). Typical data types include bathymetric and topographic survey, digital elevation models, dredge cuts, placement sites, sub-bottom compositions, soil types, wetlands, land cover, endangered species and their habitat, stream and tide gages, cross sections, training structures, levees, dam deformation, HTRW sites, permits, piezometers, archeological sites, snow water content, Corps projects, relief wells, etc. Data may be collected for and analyzed for projects at specific sites as part of systems: from sub-basins to large river systems, from individual beaches to large coastal segments. Other objectives of this area include automated presentation capability, lproved QA/QC, improved data retention and longer data life, reduced recollection costs, increased data sharing, and improved, more defensible decision aking. These efforts support decision makers in all Corps business program areas: navigation, flood control, hydropower, regulatory, environmental, emergency management, recreation, water supply, and work for others. Accurate and reliable geospatial data Srqeu ired by each business program for the effective planning, design, construction, operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of projects. Annual expenditures for these data average $200M, thus significant savings from more effective and efficient data collection and management technologies, data analysis, and data exploitation will be realized. Survey and Mapping Program. Initial calibraionPr ocedures for digital cameras used in mapping Ppications were developed. Initial software and Procedures to intelligently thin very large data sets with minimal loss of model accuracy were developed and tested. Finally, software and procedures to produce 3-D levee design elements plus plans and profiles automatically from survey data were developed. Remote Sensing Program. Software and hardware techniques to integrate remotely sensed data (fi-om numerous satellite and aircraft systems) into Corps hydrologic, environmental, and economic models were developed and tested. Methods to map snow water content from remote sensors for operational use were developed for the Sierra Nevada in California and the Great Plains snowpacks in the Missouri River Basin. This integrated snow cover monitoring system uses AV HRR imagery and consists of algorithms for preparing gridded input data, i.e., temperature and snow water equivalence, a distributed snow process model (DSPM), and export visualization routines for Corps View. Statistical methods for the application and classification of remotely sensed data were produced in FY00. Preliminary automated software for these statistical methods was developed and applied to COE water resources projects for demonstration and analysis. These methods will greatly reduce digitization costs and maintain high reliability standards for geospatial analysis. Improved methods have been developed for serving geospatial data over an Intranet for emergency managers, the first successful implementation of Internet Map Serving software within the Corps of Engineers. The Eagle Vision II satellite-receiving system has been tested and methods developed for the rapid acquisition and dissemination of satellite imagery to the Corps' emergency management community. New display methods have been developed for easier access to geospatial data, a potential second-generation interface for the ENGLink Interactive Geospatial software developed, and an expanded and improved set of nonproprietary data developed. Very large image data sets have been acquired and processed. An indexing approach has been developed for these data, and documentation is being completed. Evaluation of the EMERGE digital airborne sensor is being finalized. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Program. Improved flood damage analysis software with integrated commercial GIS capability and users' manual were completed and distributed. Following completion of the cataloging of Corps models, the "model advisor" software assisting users to select the best simulation models for problem-driven applications was demonstrated and provided on-line. The Level II GIS interface standard for Corps simulation models was developed, demonstrated, and documented. Development of the Level III and IV protocols was initiated. Guidelines were established for the Corps-wide integration of CADD and GIS data. A report on links 42-9 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER between two of the Corps' nongeospatial legacy databases that use geospatial data, including strategies to maximize their use and information content through GIS-enabled map display, query, and analytical capability, was completed. Development of geospatial ties to the Real Estate Management Information System (REMIS) was started. A report on methods for the integration of multiple data set types in on-line applications was completed, presented, and published on the Internet. Work on enterprise approaches to warehousing and use of geospatial data within the Corps was completed. Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Center (RS/GISC) Program. The RS/GISC is the principal catalyst for the evolution and application of emerging remote sensing and geographic information systems technologies in execution of the Corps' civil works planning, engineering, operations, and maintenance activities in all business program areas. The RS/GISC manages the Corps' geospatial research and development program area, remote sensing and GIS research and development programs, emergency management RS/GIS support, RS/GIS activities in the Corps' Water Control Data System (WCDS) Software Modernization Program, GIS support for the national management of Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) cleanup, hosting and teaching the Corps' PROSPECT training in GIS, and GIS and remote sensing assistance in the delineation and mapping of wetlands. The RS/GISC also acts as the principal technology assistance hub for new applications of RS/GIS technologies for the Corps district offices across the nation. Based in the RS/GISC, our Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) research programs support the Army's civil works mission by improving methods for acquisition, image processing, and development, management, and analysis of geospatial data. An enterprise approach to corporate geospatial data and the integration of all geospatial data (data from GIS, RS, survey and mapping, and CADD), and the development of applications meeting the needs of Corps civil works business programs are critical focus areas. Accomplishments in FY00 include: serving as the technology point of contact for the Corps of Engineers for civil works remote sensing and GIS; ongoing technology transfer through training courses (more than 145 students in six classes), briefings, technical papers and technical demonstrations; working with North Atlantic Division and districts to develop a prototype for regional corporate GIS; providing technical support to Corps' district offices for the development of implementation plans for geospatial data management; supporting one stop service requests from Corps' districts and divisions; serving on the Tri-Service Computer Aided Design and Drafting Technical Center's Executive Work Group; working with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) in the New England region for the implementation of the FGDC standards; participating in the development of a strategic approach to civil works research and development; sponsoring and participating in the development of national and international remote sensing and GIS conferences; and developing and transferring improved techniques for inclusion of snowmelt in water control decision support. Aquatic Plant Control Research Program (APCRP). APCRP is the Nation's leader in aquatic plant research and technology for managing problem aquatic plant infestations of major economic significance in public and navigable waters. APCRP provides environmentally compatible, cost-effective methods for identifying, assessing, and managing aquatic plants. Through direct application of APCRP-developed technology, researchers have successfully reduced the levels of two problem emergent species (alligatorweed and water hyacinth) to maintenance levels throughout the United States. Currently, major research efforts are focused on technology to manage two problem submersed aquatic plant species (hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil) that infest waters in 43 states. In FY00, the APCRP updated a computer-based Aquatic Plant Information System (APIS) that guides users in selecting control options and formulating costeffective management plans for site-specific plant problems. Improved techniques to deliver aquatic herbicides to the target plant were developed. These improved delivery systems will allow operational personnel to maximize efficacy on submersed vegetation, with a minimum of herbicide and application costs. Ecological associations were developed between plant complexity and fish distribution and abundance. Managers can use this to predict the type of fishery in specific plant habitats and understand implications Of plant control and restoration on changes in abundance, diversity, and distribution of fish species. The development on new formulations of pathogens for the control of hydrilla and Eurasian watermil continued. Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program (DOER). DOER was established to effectively reduce operational costs and enhance environmental compliance in response to numerous Corps field requests with support from groups with interests in ports, navigation, and environmenal isetal The program focuses on operational and environnio dredging issues of national economic and environ mental significance that involve both the physical 42-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 processes of sediment and water dynamics, as well as the environmental concerns of contaminants, habitat, and ecological risk. A primary task in DOER is an aggressive technology transfer effort to assure rapid transition and acceptance of cost-effective and environmentally sensitive technology to field users. Significant accomplishments during FY00 were (a)d eveloped risk-assessment methods for evaluating dredged material placement in upland and nearshore sites; (b) developed design guidance for placement of contaminated sediments in Confined Disposal Facilities; (c) demonstrated innovative equipment for in-channel sediment relocation; (d) completed guidance on using Tons Dry Solids (TDS) for determining actual loads dredged by hopper dredges; (e) completed guidance on application of the Silent Inspector (SI) technology for hopper dredges and pipeline dredges; (f) accomplished major advances in the state-of-the-art for predicting erosion rate of fine-grained sediments; (g)developed a beta version of the Dredged Material Spatial Management Analysis Resolution Tool (DMSMART), a geographic information system (GIS) customized for dredged material management and (h) publication of applied research results, where the studies supported development of the methods, tests, and models listed above. In addition, DOER research results were integrated into the DOTS Online Institute, where three dredging-related courses are offered: Dredging Regulations, Dredged Material Management, and Basic Benthic Testing. Issues addressed this year include approaches for low-cost dredged material treatment options, guidelines and specifications for an automated system for monitoring of location, status, and capacity for dredged material dump scow, continued investigation of finegrained sediments properties to improve predictions of dredged material disposal mound erosion, complete a mixed sediment, layered bed version of the Long Term Fate of Dredged Material (MDFATE) that predicts erosion of dredged material mounds, and initiate steps to provide tools that will allow Districts low cost placement of mixed sediments nearshore to keep sand I the littoral system. A significant accomplishment has been the cooperation and collaboration of agencies and organizations sharing the Corps' interest. Coastal Inlets Research Program (CIRP). The CIRP is an effort to increase the capabilities to cost effectively design and maintain the more than 100 inlet navigation projects that comprise the bulk of Corps astaolp erations and maintenance (O&M) expenditles. According to Corps estimates, expenditures will esd $8 billion at coastal inlets over the next 25 years for dredging, structure installation, structure maintenance and rehabilitation, and mitigation for damages caused by federal projects. The CIRP is furthering fundamental knowledge of complex inlet processes as well as developing new and improved capabilities for conducting O&M activities. It also addresses local and regional impacts of navigation projects on adjacent shores. Transfer of technology to Districts and Divisions is a CIRP priority, including annual workshops and innovative use of the worldwide web http://cirp.wes.army.mil/cirp/cirp.html. During FY00 a physical-processes based automated sediment budget system for management of inlets and adjacent beaches was developed and verified and released Corps wide and to consulting companies and academia. A numerical model to predict scour for regions characterized by local flow curvature, flow separation, entrainment, and flow interaction with inlet structures was also developed and verified. This model has been released to the public through the worldwide web. A web-based tutorial and handbook on coastal inlets called "Inlets Online" that addresses needs from the professional engineering and science level to college and high school education was produced. Major laboratory experiments and theoretical studies on wave diffraction at inlets was conducted to upgrade the Corps' numerical wave model to test the diffraction algorithm. Planning began for transition of R&D products on deep-draft navigation channels for reduction of O&M dredging and cost of doing business. A technology-transfer workshop was conducted in Florida for 60 Corps, consulting companies, and university staff members. Recreation Management Support Program. The RMSP conducts research and provides related technical assistance in support of the Civil Works Recreation Business Area. The program is divided into three major elements: management studies, management assistance, and information exchange. In FY00, research was completed that assesses the regional economic impacts of the Corps recreation program and provides managers with a tool to monitor economic impacts of the program. FY00 research continued to identify the benefits of the recreation program. Using recently released data from the 2000 Census, demographic trends were identified affecting the recreation program and associated recreation facility modernization initiatives. Best practices were identified and refined to address the recreation needs of ethnic minority visitors using Corps projects. Customer satisfaction monitoring tools continued to be developed and distributed to field staff. Technical assistance addressing recreation use estimation issues was provided to field managers. 42-11 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Zebra Mussel Research Program (ZMRP). The ZMRP is the only Federally authorized R&D program for the development of technology for zebra mussel control. The focus is to develop environmentally sound control methods for use in and around public facilities. The zebra mussel has spread throughout the eastern half of the United States and threatens the rivers and water supply systems of western states. More than $100 million is spent annually to prevent catastrophic shutdown of public facilities in the east and central United States, and this cost will substantially increase over the next few years as zebra mussels continue their westward expansion. More cost-effective and environmentally sensitive methods are required to control this problem. The ZMRP is coordinated with the research programs of other Federal, regional, and state agencies, and private industry through the Zebra Mussel Coordination Committee, established under the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act. Research has determined that zebra mussels are adapting to the high temperature of southern waters. This allows them to increase their range, which will increase the cost of control significantly in areas where zebra mussels were originally thought to be of little or no concern. Additional research has also determined that zebra mussels increase the rate of corrosion on metal structures threefold. This means that structures must be maintained on a 3- to 5-year schedule, rather than the normal 10- to 15-year schedule, increasing maintenance costs and interrupting navigation and power generation nationally. Successes include completion of a 5-year evaluation of coatings and materials to prevent zebra mussel attachment. Published results present significant savings to power plants, the boating industry, and Corps facilities. In addition, the most widely used means of non-chemical control (thermal shock, desiccation, and freezing) were directly derived from the ZMRP research efforts on physiological factors affecting the control of zebra mussels. The ZMRP is transferring this technology through a CD-ROM information system (updated yearly) and an engineering handbook for facility managers and operators of locks and dams, water supply and treatment facilities, power plants, and vessels. The CD-ROM (over 7,000 distributed to date) and handbook help managers and operators determine the vulnerability of their facility and outline control options. As the zebra mussel continues to expand its range in the United States, the audiences for ZMRP technology transfer products, such as technical notes and technical reports increases. To ensure rapid transfer of this information to the field, the ZMRP has established a Web site that allows interested parties to review the information on the site and to also download hard copies of the technical notes and reports. Water Operations Technical Support (WOTS) Program. The WOTS Program provides comprehensive and interdisciplinary technology transfer and technology application to all Corps water resource projects. WOTS is managed to maximize costeffectiveness and ensure broad dissemination and implementation of technology and information. The program provides effective environmental and water quality engineering technology to address a wide range of water resource management problems at Corps reservoir and waterway projects, and in the river systems affected by project operations nationwide. In addition, WOTS provides technology to address problems occurring from the presence of zebra mussels and other non-indigenous aquatic species, tail-water fisheries at pump-back hydropower projects, water quality impacts of shoreline erosion control and reservoir sedimentation, and other project operations related to environmental and water quality issues. Since its inception, WOTS has provided environmental and water quality technological solutions to over 1,100 problems identified at projects from every Corps district. The program annually publishes numerous copies of manuals, bulletins, notes, and reports. WOTS annually conducts specialty workshops, training personnel on the latest environmental and water quality management techniques. In FY00, the WOTS Progran conducted five technology demonstration efforttos verify management strategies and techniques, four training workshops on environmental and water quality management techniques, and prepared nine technical publications for distribution to the field. WOTS continually endeavors to coordinate with water quality elements of other Federal agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, Tennessee Valley Authority, Bureau of Reclamation, Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Bonneville Power Admin" stration. These efforts have involved watershed management activities, problems on the spread o zebra mussels, the impacts of hydropower facilities, and cd water releases Dredging Operations Technical Supt (DOTS) Program. The DOTS Program provider/cor prehensive and interdisciplinary technology trans technology application to all Corps navigation dredg projects. DOTS is managed from a centralized pro0gr 42-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 to maximize cost-effectiveness and implement National policies and laws on a consistent basis. The program provides direct technical support to all Corps elements involved in maintaining navigation projects. DOTS focuses on applying technology and research results to field problems. Emerging scientific approaches to testing dredged material and constant changes in regulation of these programs cause uncertainty in administering the Corps' dredging program. Major features of the DOTS Program include training Corps staff on the latest environmental and engineering techniques associated with dredging and dredged material disposal and with water quality and related aquatic environmental issues; technology transfer of new and emerging techniques used to determine compliance with environmental protection statutes regarding the management of dredged material; transfer of technology developed by others that deal with the treatment and decontamination of highly contaminated sediments; and applying and transferring innovative risk-based technologies that identify, assess, and manage sediments contaminated with high-profile chemicals such as dioxin, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, and polychlorinated biphenols. Technology is presented in the form of field-ready decision support systems, technical notes, manuals, and an extensive World Wide Web site (). Since inception, DOTS has satisfied over 4,130 requests for direct technical assistance. Ongoing dredged material technology application tasks include guidance in using the implementation manuals for the Clean Water Act and the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. Guidance for applying techniques and methodologies to the management of contaminated dredged material, including risk management, equipment selection, confined disposal facility management, and quality assurance/control, were implemented and published. The program also reported ocean-dumping activities to the EPA and the International Maritime Organization as required by the London Convention. Since sediment management seminars were initiated in 1991, over 4,000 personnel from Federal, state, and local agencies have been trained at 12 seminars on the latest techniques in regulating, testing, and managing dredged materials. The program publishes and makes electronically available on the Web site all manuals, bulletins, technical reports, technical notes, data, and Policy guidance documents on dredging and dredged aterial management activities. Mabnagement Tools for Operation and Maintedlec (O&M) Program. Due to increasing CW O&M d constraints and the need for a performancebased CW O&M budget, the Management Tools for O&M Program was established in FY00. This research program is developing a performance-based benefits analysis model/procedure for prioritization/ranking of the maintenance activities of the annual CW O&M budget, including a best practices component to assist in cost-efficient execution of the O&M budget. The resulting product will provide an objective, consistent, and reproducible procedure to be used for O&M budget prioritization, for quantifying the impact of deferred maintenance on maintenance and/or operations expenditures, and for identifying the optimum (lowest) level of O&M funding required to maintain established levels of customer service. Component level condition indices (Cl's) and QUADRANT are two tools which are being utilized in the development of the performance-based benefit analysis model. The Cl's are objectively based, reproducible numerical indicators of the condition of structures and equipment. QUADRANT provides economic (net benefit value) information for prioritizing annual non-routine maintenance. A summary index (SI) procedure, based on CI's, is being developed as an indicator for the overall condition of a project or site. Additionally, an Internet accessible O&M Cost Reduction Handbook will provide brief descriptions of research activities that have been successfully utilized in the field but not widely implemented. In FY00, the beta version of the O&M Cost Reduction Handbook was completed and field evaluation initiated. Reports and training were completed on the Embankment Dam and Non-Rubble Breakwaters & Jetties CI procedures. Decision points were reached on what other Cl's will be developed, and how CI inspection procedures will be simplified. Procedures for developing composite Cl's that are applicable to maintenance work items in the annual O&M budget were proposed for field review. A review of existing methods of benefits analysis for work item prioritization was completed and integrated into ongoing field efforts directed at O&M budget prioritization. CUSTOMER SUPPORT Increasingly, ERDC expertise and products developed in R&D programs are being requested to solve challenges in critical areas of concern. Ice Control Structure for Cazenovia Creek. The physical and numerical model study of the low cost ice control structure for Cazenovia Creek, near West Seneca, NY, was completed. Final report and design recommendations were forwarded to Buffalo District. Construction costs of this ice control structure have 42-13 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER been estimated at $1,000,000 as opposed to the $3M construction costs of a traditional dam structure as was proposed in the 1980's. The reduction in costs is a direct result of the engineering research and development performed earlier under this program to develop and test low cost ice control methods. Ice Management. ERDC assisted a number of districts with ice problems. The final report of the physical model study of ice management at the Soo Locks was presented to Detroit District. The report recommended size, location, and orientation of high flow bubblers needed to divert ice from the Poe Lock approach for passage through the MacArthur Lock. Ice management techniques were suggested for the upstream and downstream miter gates of the Poe Lock to facilitate operation during the early navigation season. Work completed for the Omaha District included the impact of downstream ice jamming on operation of Oahe Dam on the Missouri River and recommended maximum water releases as a function of existing downstream ice conditions to avoid ice jam flooding of the cities of Pierre and Fort Pierre. Iceaffected risk and uncertainty methods were developed for use in a study by St. Paul District of the complex flood control protection at Wahpeton, ND. A newly developed scour probe was used to obtain in-situ field measurements of ice induced and other bed scour in the Illinois River. Web Cameras. At the request of various districts, a number of Web cameras were installed to monitor ice conditions near locks and dams and other river structures or in remote, difficult to reach areas. Images from the digital cameras are regularly transmitted to ERDC where they are displayed on web pages so that evolution of ice conditions at critical sites can be monitored. Corps-wide Geospatial Data. Working with Mississippi Valley Division, Rock Island District, and HQUSACE, requirements were developed and acquisition initiated for a common Corps-wide set of geospatial data. This data will provide all Corps districts, divisions, laboratories, centers, and programs with common base data that can serve as a framework for Corps projects. Emergency Management. Emergency management support activities were significant in FY00, starting with a series of meetings with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to be better prepared for the hurricane season. Support was provided for a small, but important, hurricane season. Models were regularly run and, for the first time, provided every six hours prior to expected landfall. The Internet was used to post the results of the model runs as part of enabling Corps' mission managers to better scope expected missions for the provision of potable water, ice, temporary roofing, and debris removal. Training was provided to FEMA for their managers to improve coordination and the passing of information between the agencies. Possible overestimation of damages by the hurricane wind damage model is being examined in a validation effort. Online handbooks were developed for hurricanes and floods, illustrating modeling tools, imagery, and GIS approaches and products available to emergency managers. Limitations and caveats concerning use are also addressed. Maps were developed for a flood and earthquake disaster workshop sponsored by Lakes and River Division and South Pacific Division. ERDC members also assisted numerous districts with ice jam flooding and mitigation. Ice jam flood mitigation efforts included site visits and training sessions for state and local agencies. Coordination with the National Weather Service has resulted in the development of ice monitoring networks that facilitate rapid, effective response. Satellite and Airborne Remote Sensing, Numerous requests for assistance in commercial and developing sensors were received from Corps' districts. This includes sensors working in the visible and near infrared, infrared, and microwave portions of the spectrum. Information was provided about sensors meeting specific requirements, how to obtain imagery, and appropriate image processing techniques. Model Linkage. To assist with the evaluation of the consequences of alternative land use and project alternatives, work continued on the development of a framework of protocols and standards to handle data flow between concurrently running models and RSGIS tools in standardized ways. Linkage of models wilble easier and less costly due to the selection of a limited number of standardized approaches. For the first time, it will be possible to link the models necessary to adequately analyze the complex natural and huma influenced landscape processes necessary for proposed and existing projects. A catalog advisor listing Corps developed models and providing tools to assist in the determination of best models for specific applicat oi has been completed and is available on-line, Lrotl requirements have been evaluated and the Lever protocol has been developed and tested. wo thd proceeding on Level III and IV protocols. IliS of results in savings through reduction in the numethe models that will be developed and by eliminatin 42-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 need for separate interfaces to be developed for each model. Automated Vectorization. Algorithms were evaluated and methods to integrate raster data into vector GIS were distributed to Corps districts and divisions. These methods greatly accelerate the ability to include data sources such as planning information, scanned maps, orthographic photographs, and as-built drawings into GIS databases. Improved data integration supports better decision-making and results in more cost-effective project development, selection, operation, and maintenance. Positive feed back has been received on the utility of the software. Geographic Information Systems. Queries come to RS/GIS Center staff from districts concerning choice of GIS software, implementation issues, enterprise approaches, and development of applications. Center staff visited all North Atlantic Division districts to assist with the development of a prototype enterprise GIS that would meet district and division requirements. A prototype providing access to stream gage, reservoir, project, and disaster-related data was completed and online access provided for evaluation and feedback. Provisions were made for an orthophotographic base for the geospatial data. Paint Technology Center. The ERDC Paint Technology Center provides Corps Districts with failure analysis, paint testing, and field consultation services. Since contractor compliance with Corps specification is critical to infrastructure safety and reliability and to the reduction of maintenance costs, Corps district consulted ERDC for guidance on the paint specification portion of their bridge restoration project. A district was provided failure analysis on a metalizing project, for which ERDC determined the cause of the problem, and made recommendations that Would prevent reoccurrence upon recoating. Technology The Paint Center's paint testing capability has helped over 20 Corps district offices avoid construction delays. A test report is provided for each sample, which Provides testing results and final recommendation for the approval or refusal of the sample. In all, over 200 paintcoating samples were tested. Corrosion Design Studies. ERDC is assisting New England District in the design of a corrosion protection system, which includes coating and cathodic protection (CP) of a sheet pile structure for the contaminated disposal facility located in New Bedford Harbor. ERDC recommended that the sheet pile be Coated and cathodically protected with a replaceable Sacrificial aluminum anode system. The CP is a unique design that incorporates a replaceable anode system every 20 years. The total cost of the CP system is estimated at $600K. ERDC also participated in a corrosion design project for Wyckoff/Eagle Harbor and provided assistance on the design of corrosion protection for a sheet pile retainment wall as part of a remediation effort for a Superfund site on Bainbridge Island. Seismic Vulnerability of Equipment. The Corps of Engineers' Northwestern Division is evaluating the seismic vulnerability of its civil works facilities and has conducted walk-down inspections. The resulting reports identify equipment and provide limited recommendations for protecting equipment through anchorage, bracing, and flexible utility connections. ERDC organized the walk-down inspection information into a single database in order to define the scope of known vulnerabilities and mitigation recommendations. ERDC also identified potential internal vulnerabilities based on work done by others and engineering judgment. Future actions will be recommended to define vulnerabilities through analytical studies or experimental testing. Energy Supply Optimization for Innovative Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control. Chicago District is responsible for the construction and development of a 20,000 acre-feet reservoir as part of a massive multi-billion dollar CSO and off-line flood control program. Chicago District asked ERDC to model/demonstrate/evaluate the phenomena that are expected to occur. A large-scale physical model will be developed using an available excess digester at a local wastewater treatment plant and retrofitting it with a battery of computer controls and various probes. Experimentation will determine the effectiveness of a variety of mixing systems and oxygen transfer mechanisms on combined sanitary and storm wastewater to evaluate sediment mixing and changes in water quality. This research will enable the appropriate design and equipment selection to meet the project requirements in the most cost-effective manner. Cooperative Research with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The ERDC continued a three-year cooperative research program with the EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory in Athens, Georgia. The program focuses on the South Fork of the Broad River in Georgia. ERDC personnel provided technical assistance in establishing a network of data collection sites within the Broad river basin. A CASC2D finite difference distributed hydrology model of the basin was set up and run with estimates of initial values. In addition, a WASH123D finite element distributed hydrology model was constructed. The CASC2D code is capable of performing long-term 42-15 ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER simulations of rainfall runoff and soil erosion events. In FYO1, the model will be calibrated to available field data. Ultimately, the model will be used to assist in establishing Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) criteria for the basin. The CASC2D code is being enhanced to model in-channel sediment transport and to evaluate water quality and pathogen transport. The CASC2D/WASH 1I23D modeling effort is being expanded to include the Cowan Bayou area in South Mississippi. Dredged Material Fate Modeling. A study was performed for Wilmington District to support designation of a new Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) for the Wilmington Harbor navigation project. The ERDC effort was to predict the geometry of dredged material mounds placed in the proposed ODMDS, followed by predicting the long term fate of those mounds when exposed to both tropical storms and a year of "normal waves" using the MDFATE model to simulate mound geometry and LTFATE to simulate mound stability. Based on discussions with Wilmington District, the fate of two types of dredged material was simulated. LTFATE simulations of mound stability were conducted on the two mound configurations developed using MDFATE. Four erosion potential scenarios were simulated for each mound configuration and event. The LTFATE simulations indicated that there is a high probability of significant erosion and transport of sediment from either mound during both modest and severe storm conditions. Results from both sets of simulations were also used to make site management and monitoring recommendations. Wave Protection and the "Maalaea Pipeline", Maalaea Harbor, Maui. ERDC conducted a study directed at the need for navigation improvements at Maalaea Harbor to reduce wave energy within the harbor basin and entrance channel and the resultant damage to vessels; reduce navigation hazards in the entrance channel; and provide opportunity for the addition of berthing spaces and attendant harbor facilities. A 1:50 scale physical model was used to evaluate various structural alternatives for providing wave protection. A critical test condition was to verify alternative impacts on the surfing waves that compose the "Maalaea Pipeline". A total of 9 improvement plans were studied, all of which had no adverse impact on the surfing waves. The alternative which provided the most improvement in navigation and reduction in harbor wave heights included a 466-ft-long extension to the existing south breakwater; addition of a triangular shaped mole on the seaward side of the existing south breakwater; a 150-ft wide by 600-ft-long entrance channel; and a 1.7 acre, 12-ft-deep turning basin. Support of EPA Superfund Projects. ERDC is actively involved in hydrodynamic and sediment transport studies in support of several EPA superfund projects. ERDC models were used to study contaminant (PCB, Dioxin, and other toxic chemicals) mobility at sites in Virginia and North and South Carolina. Delong Mountain Terminal, Alaska. ERDC is providing support to the Alaska District in the study of a proposed channel and turning basin at the Delong Mountain Terminal (DMT), an open water port in the Chukchi Sea, north of the Bering Strait, used for shipping zinc and lead concentrates. A deep-water channel has been proposed to allow ocean-going ships to call directly at DMT, eliminating the present barging operation and increasing the terminal's capacity and throughput. ERDC researchers are using field measurements and numerical models to simulate wind, wave, and current conditions at the site that will be used in several elements of the design. Apra Harbor, Guam. The only access road for Guam's commercial port lies adjacent to an exposed ocean coast, protected from the sea by a relatively low, recurved concrete seawall fronted by a rubble-strewn beach. During severe typhoons, waves run up the beach, overtop the seawall, and cause disruption and damage to the road and port facilities. ERDC is supporting the Honolulu district in developing a project design to reduce vulnerability of the road and container yard to overtopping and flooding. A combination of numerical modeling tools was used to estimate typhoon flooding with both existing and planned beach configurations. The proposed project was shown to have a major impact on reducing overtopping rates. Northwest Fisheries Engineering Program ERDC has been involved in the development and evaluation of various programs aimed at structural modifications and/or operational guidance in diverting or passing juvenile salmon around or through dais n the Columbia and Snake Rivers. These studies 5 being conducted to re-establish fish runs without losing use of the Columbia-Snake river system, which playsa vital role in the economic well being of the region There are numerous studies involving field effos numerical modeling, and physical modeling to address major issues concerned with fish bypass sYt These include Fish Guidance Efficiency systems ~rfcE located in the entrance to the powerhouse, .uven l collectors, outfall siting locations for the j salmon after they have been collected utilizilg a and/or surface collector, flow deflectors on spillway, water quality issues, and po eo fol turbines. These efforts have been grouped intO 42-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TilE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY00 major areas of interest: FGE systems, Surface Bypass Collectors, Gas Abatement, and Turbine Modeling. These studies have developed new approaches or innovative designs to ensure safe and efficient passage of fish through dams and to improve water quality conditions. The pioneering research has saved millions of dollars through improved design and scheduling without trial-and-error iteration. These to restore salmon runs serve as a model for similar studies in other regions of the U.S. and the world. 42-17 INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES The Institute for Water Resources (IWR) is a field operating activity under the staff supervision of the Director for Civil Works, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE). The Institute consists of the Hydrologic Engineering Center, the Navigation Data Center, the Decision Methodologies Division, the Navigation and Water Resources Applications Division, the Planning and Policy Studies Division, the Program Analysis Division, and support elements. It is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Alexandria, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center in Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, part of the Navigation Data Center, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of IWR during FY00 are listed by division. HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER (HEC) Top priorities for FY 2000 were our Corps Water Management System modernization software development and integration project, NexGen software research and development project, watershed and water resource system analysis, and comprehensive system studies. Progress was substantial in all these areas. Customer demand for HEC services and products continues to be high. Our reimbursable projects program continues strong, resulting in another fiscal high at year-end. Many of the senior professional staff are reaching retirement age and retirements have commenced. The pace will quicken in FY 2001 on through 2002. Restocking of staff has commenced in earnest. The project to modernize the Water Control Data System (WCDS) software began in FY97. Because the modernized system will be much more than a data system, it was renamed to the Corps Water Management System (CWMS). CWMS is the decision Support Automated Information Systems (AIS) that supports the Corps water management mission. It embodies data acquisition, validation, transformation and management; forecasting, simulation and decision support analysis; and information dissemination. Modernizing and deploying the corporate CWMS software for is a six-year, $7.6 million centrally PRIP funded, Corps AIS improvement project managed Under the Corps Life Cycle Management of Information Systems (LCMIS) process. The management structure and design teams form a unique arrangement for providing oversight and field articipation in the enterprise-wide development and ntegraion project. The significant accomplishment in Feld 2000 as installation of Test Version 2.0 at four field sites. This is the second planned interim test installations prior to Test 3.0/CWMS Version 1.0, which will complete the system. CWMS is scheduled to be deployed Corps-wide in 2001/2002. The project is on schedule and within budget. Project documents are available on the project Internet Web site: (http://cw71 .cw-wc.usace.army.mil/cwcinfo/cwc.html). The NexGen software research and development project continues to roll out products for Corps field offices. There are now Arc/Info and ArcView version of HEC-GeoRAS, providing GIS utility support for HEC-RAS, the widely popular river hydraulics software package. HEC-HMS (Version 2.0) was also released. This new version of the Corps standard watershed model includes a moisture accounting loss algorithm. Work is now underway on the next version that will add dam safety and planning analysis capabilities. A pre-release of the unsteady flow version of HEC-RAS (Version 3.0) was released for testing. Public release is expected early next fiscal year. A GIS utility package (HEC-GeoHMS) was released in the summer. This utility provides substantial capability to effectively use national terrain data sets to rapidly develop HEC-HMS models. Building models for the tributaries to the Central Valley of California was the shakedown application of GeoHMS. The major flood damage and risk analysis software package, HEC FDA, continues to be improved. The two new NexGen software programs that are components of CWMS were improved and are included in CWMS Test Version 2.0. They are a new simulation/real-time reservoir operations model, and a flood impact analysis model. These programs will continue to be improved and will likely be released within the Corps in stand-alone form late in FY 2001. 43-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY00 One aspect of our activities in the risk-based analysis and flood frequency analysis areas was completed this past year. The panel of The National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (NRC) that reviewed the Corps use of risk-based analysis delivered its final report this year. HEC represented the Corps attending meetings, making presentations, and exchanging information on this topic. The report focused substantially on the HECFDA program that provides the analytical tool for implementing risk analysis in the field. In general, the NRC report commends the Corps for their risk analysis initiative, and encourages continued development of the methodology. Suggestions for improvements are made in several areas. We began a research project to address hydrologic risk and uncertainty and environment restoration performance. This is an area of inquiry that is expected to grow. The re-study of flood frequency on the upper Mississippi River in light of the flood of 1993 continues to close in on the final phase. A report documenting the flow frequency analysis methods and preliminary results was completed. A case example application of extreme flood magnitude and frequency estimates was initiated as part of the new Dam Safety R&D. Preliminary results are expected in FY 2001. Six PROSPECT courses were conducted for a total of six weeks of training. The courses covered several hydrologic engineering and planning analysis topics including HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS, GIS applications, and two new watershed/river and wetlands restoration courses. Attendance averaged about 25 students per course. Five on-site workshops were also held totaling four weeks of sessions for 150 students. While this continued the recent trend of reduced PROSPECT signups and increased requests for on-site workshops, FY 2001 looks to reverse the trend with up to ten PROSPECT courses likely to be presented. Topics presented in the workshops included HEC-RAS, HECHMS, and hydrologic engineering in planning. Reimbursable project work was undertaken for 14 Corps field offices as well as HQUSACE, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, University of California, and the National Institute for Building Sciences. Projects include watershed and reservoir system modeling, water quality, risk analysis, river hydraulics, wetlands hydrology, water control management, regional statistical analysis, flood damage analysis, GIS applications in hydrology and hydraulics, and groundwater modeling. In the upper Mississippi, HEC is managing the project to update the model geometry for the Mississippi Basin Model System (MBMS) to reflect more recent mapping and to develop an inundation mapping component based on the new mapping was re-activated this year. Map products from the contractors continue to lag resulting in a one-for-one lag in the project, with late delivery of up to eighteen months likely. Remaining work includes cutting the new river section geometry, integrating these new digital map-based geometry sections into the UNET models, re-calibrate the models, and prepare final reports. It is clear that the Corps will not receive contractor map products in time to complete the project in fiscal year 2000. Work will need to continue through FY 2001 before completion can be declared. The reimbursable project to assist in modeling the Sacramento and San Joaquin river basins for flood control operations is moving toward the documentation phase. This is part of a comprehensive study by Sacramento District to review the flood damage reduction system for the Central Valley of California. Preliminary models were completed in Phase I, and improved models are now near completion under Phase II. The models (separate models for the Sacramento Valley and San Joaquin Valley) are: HEC- 5 for flood control operations; HEC-FCLP, system flood control operation optimization; HEC-FIA, flood economic/damage impact analysis model, and HECHMS (flood runoff model). Data compilation, and some of model development will later serve as the base for modernized CWMS implementation for these areas. We began an interesting project that is developing a flood forecast system for an area of the Susquehanla basin that has as its final outputs, forecast flood inundation map with associated flood damage- a first Work will continue through this year into spring FY 2001. The total reimbursable project program was over $2.0 million with individual projects ranging froma few thousand dollars to near a million. The HEC program for FY 2001 will continue FY 2000 efforts at the brisk pace reflected at the end ofthe year. We will continue fielding new versions ofthe NexGen software packages HEC-RAS, HEC-IS asd HEC-FDA, and companion GIS utility softare. emerging will be the first public release of the neW reservoir simulation program HEC-ResSim, and initi unsteady flow capability of HEC-RAS (Version 3.0). 43-2 INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES Test Version 3.0 of the modernized CWMS will be installed and tested in five Corps offices, LCMIS Milestone Decision III secured, and Corps-wide deployment commence. PROSPECT training will increase to about ten courses and the number of field workshops will likely continue at about the same rate. Research and Development funding is expected to continue to decline - not a good trend, software maintenance and support and WCDS modernization funding will remain at about FY 2000 levels, and reimbursable technical assistance and special projects will likely level off. On balance, the result is expected to be a stable to slight increase in funding over that of FY 2000. The reorganization of HQUSACE, is complete, with HEC reassigned as a Center within the Institute for Water Resources. We expect increased synergy with other IWR elements, and anticipate no adverse affect on services to our customers. DECISION METHODOLOGIES DIVISION The Decision Methodologies Division (DMD) develops procedures, analytical techniques and methods to aid in water resources investment and management decisions. It provides technical assistance to the field and conducts special studies and projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The division also conducts several training courses for field personnel. Division engineers and scientists apply specialized knowledge in economics, environmental science, geography, risk analysis and engineering to develop practical and effective planning and decision support tools. These tools are applied by district employees to water resources activities throughout the Corp of Engineers. The division provides management for the Decision Support Technologies and Risk Analysis for Water Resources Investments research programs. Within these programs, the division is currently developing tools to facilitate watershed-planning approaches, such as collaborative problem solving, multi-objective planning, and tradeoff analysis. In the risk analysis program, tools and decision methods are being developed for applications to environmental restoration and deep draft navigation projects. addition In to work supporting analysis in these areas, the division developed and tested methods for assessing uncertainty in project cost and for combining uncertain costs and benefits. New research was initiated to Provide analytical methods and decision support tools for the Risk Analysis for the Dam Safety Research D~n . The decision support tools developed by DM Serve as the standard used for evaluating Corps ineers water resources projects. The DMD provides technical assistance to Corps field divisions and districts. During FY00, the DMD performed analyses and provided technical assistance to Corps districts on ecosystem restoration, formulation and evaluation, risk analysis, inland navigation, deep draft navigation, cost effectiveness and incremental cost analysis, and budget formulation and analysis. The division provided technical assistance to Jacksonville District on their Storm Damage Model and to the Wilmington District on their shore protection model. Also, assistance was provided to the Galveston District for navigation improvements to the Gulf Intercoastal Waterway, the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, and on the Green's Bayou flood damage reduction relocation study. The Mobile District was provided assistance for their study of improvements to the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Waterway. Assistance was provided to the New Orleans District for their study of recreation in the Lower Atchafalaya River. The division provided technical assistance in conducting cost effectiveness/incremental cost analysis to New York, Baltimore, Norfolk, Sacramento and Mobile districts. Technical assistance to the Ft. Worth District on dam safety portfolio risk assessment was initiated in FY00. The division supports the preparation and analysis of the O&M budget by providing technical support for the Automated Budget System (ABS). All Districts, Divisions and Headquarters use the ABS to create work packages, rank their importance and analyze the impacts of different budget scenarios on each organization. A new module, ABSMCDM, was added to the ABS in FY00 to allow for the ranking of work packages based on multiple criteria. This module adds to professional judgment as another means to rank work packages. 43-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY00 The division manages the collection, management and analysis of the Corps' flood damage data collection program. Flood damage data from recent flood events has been collected and through analysis, will help develop more accurate assessments of flood damages. Using this data, the division developed and HQUSACE distributed the first Corps-wide depth- damage relationships. This program will reduce the time and cost of developing acceptable projects to reduce the costs flooding. The division conducted several training courses during FY00. The division provided technical and management support for more than 6 Regulatory Training courses and or seminars, including the Executive Seminar for commanders and senior executives involved in making regulatory decisions. The division also conducted several PROSPECT training courses; Ecosystem Restoration, Planning and Evaluation and Conflict Management and Dispute Resolution (two sessions of each), Risk Analysis for Water Resources Planning and Management and a course on Public Involvement Techniques. The division provided on-site training to the North Atlantic, South Atlantic and South Pacific Divisions on cost effectiveness/incremental cost analysis and planning. PLANNING, POLICY AND SPECIAL STUDIES DIVISION The Planning, Policy and Special Studies Division carries out its mission in support of the Director of Civil Works by conducting policy analysis, planning and studies of national and regional scope. Since 1976, the program has contributed to the development of numerous policies and programmatic initiatives within the Civil Works Directorate as well as several important national and regional studies. The program continues to serve the Corps by assessing and evaluating changing national and regional water resources issues; natural resources uses and management; and related public works infrastructure management needs as they affect Corps Civil Works missions, policies, practices, legislative mandates, and executive directives. During FY00, the division conducted 21 policy studies in direct support of the HQ Policy Division. In addition to the policy studies program, special studies of national and regional scope were undertaken that built on the policy directives and research tools which were developed at IWR. Among the noteworthy national and regional special studies undertaken in FY00 were: * Nationwide Permit Programmatic EIS * Regulatory Cost Analysis of Nationwide Permit 26 Changes * Florida Wetlands Mitigation Banking Permit Evaluation * Development of Corps Environmental Database . Ohio River Basin El Nifio Forecast System * Newport News Water Supply Permit * Upper Mississippi River Flow Frequency Study Among the specific policy studies conducted during FY00, the following subjects and issues were included to support the development of legislation, policies, directives and guidelines for various activities within the Corps Civil Works (CW) program: a U U U U U a U U *m *m *m *m WRDA 2000 Formulation Formulation of Civil Works Strategic Plan Draft ER for Ability to Pay Revise, update Civil Works Programs Brochure Revisions to CW Planning Guidance Notebook Watershed Planning Guidance Development Environmental Benefits Analysis Regulatory Approaches to Watershed Planning National Drought Policy Commission support Hydropower Credit in Water Supply Reallocations Comprehensive Water Supply regulations NAS/NRC Mitigation Banking Study Hurricane Fran Assessment Report CW Flood Damage Reduction Brochure During the year, permanent staff personnel were joined by visiting scholars from leading universi 43-4 INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES the country. Visiting scholars work full time in the division offices or visit from time to time during their appointments. They contribute to a large number of policy and special studies and upon their return to teaching, their academic programs are enriched by exposure to information they learn while working for the Corps. Overall, the division staff and visiting scholars have a significant influence on the state of current knowledge, from papers presented at various workshops and conferences, as well as publications in peer-reviewed journals. NAVIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES APPLICATIONS DIVISION The Navigation and Water Resources Applications Division provides support for HQUSACE and field divisions and districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation improvements and other water resources issues. In this regard, it also performs recurring national-level analyses such as the update of vessel operating costs for inland and deep draft waterways, development of coastal harbor and inland segment commodity, traffic and fleet forecasts, and analysis of the recovery of navigation costs. The division also provides program management support for the Inland Waterways Users Board (IWUB), manages the U.S. Section of the International Navigation Association (PIANC), supports overall Corps coordination with the Transportation Research Board (TRB) of the National Academy of Sciences, and performs national and special studies as directed by HQUSACE. Major activities include the following projects and studies: Continuing Support Activities. The foundation for evaluation of navigation projects, both inland waterway and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation costs with and without proposed unprovements. As part of the USACE Transportation Systems Program, the division maintains and verifies current data on ocean and inland water vessel operating costs, the dimensions of these vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in the world fleet, and the Configuration of barge tows on inland waterways. This information is transmitted by HQUSACE to all Corps districts as CW planning guidance. Coordination of Navigation Studies. The IWUB, created 1986, by the Water Resources Development Act of is charged with advising Congress on priorities for improving inland waterways. To provide technical information desired by the IWUB and the Army, the division performs ongoing analysis of construction and funding schedules for navigation projects on the fueltaxed inland waterways system. This analysis incorporates the USACE and IWUB priority evaluations of inland navigation projects in accordance with the budget constraints imposed by the Trust Fund. Ongoing Studies: * National Dredging Needs Study (Section 402 of the WRDA of 1992) * Transportation Systems Program, which includes: - Update and distribution to field of transportation cost models for barges, rail and trucks - Update of both ocean and inland vessel operating and replacement costs - Development of a software package for customizing deep draft vessel operating costs - Development of national and regional commodity and fleet forecasts for use in planning studies - Update of the Grain Transportation Model * Implementation Support on Components of the Operations and Maintenance Program Plan of Improvement * Program Management Support on Activities of the IWUB * Analysis of Inland Navigation Project Schedules and Financial Status of Inland Waterways Trust Fund * Analysis of Inland Navigation Benefit Categories, including Quality of Life and Regional Economic Benefits * R&D Coastal Navigation Work Unit on the Impacts of Navigation Trends on Channel Usage and Design * Economic Evaluation of North Carolina Beaches after Hurricane Fran 43-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY00 * Analysis of USACE Dredging Quantities and Costs * Regional Economic Impact Analysis for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway Navigation Study and Inner Harbor Navigational Lock Replacement Study * Development of Risk-Based Methods to Apply to the Evaluation of Deep Draft Navigation Projects * Analysis of the recovery of waterway and harbor navigation costs, including development of a possible Harbor Services User Fee to replace the existing Harbor Maintenance Tax * Assist in the development of the Navigation Information Sharing website for inland waterway commodity movements by volume and value between states Recent Products: * Historical Economic Perspective of Ports, National Dredging Needs Study * Background and Information Papers, National Dredging Needs Study * Evaluation of Economic Benefits of Cruise Ships * Navigation Components of CW Information Brochures for U.S. states * Annual Report to Congress on the Status of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for FY99 * Shallow Draft Navigation Analysis for the Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Study * Financing Practices for International Dredging of Port and Harbors * Information Brochure: Inland Navigation Value to the Nation * Projected and Actual Traffic on Inland Waterways PROGRAM ANALYSIS DIVISION The Program Analysis Division develops and carries out assigned program analysis and evaluation studies to assist HQUSACE in Civil Works program development, defense and execution. The Division also provides analytical support to HQUSACE, and Corps field offices to describe, evaluate and improve the performance of the Civil Works program. Major activities undertaken in FY 00 include the following: * Civil Works Strategic Plan. The division managed the formulation and development of the draft Civil Works program development strategic plan. This effort has been one of the highest priorities of Civil Works. Division staff performed extensive background research, and prepared a white paper distilling national water resources issues. Based on this analysis, division staff prepared the draft strategic plan that uses the information on water resources challenges to lay out an investment plan, and program development priorities for the Corps response to the nation's water resources needs. Division staff also prepared and presented briefings on the national water resources challenges to the DCGCW, DCG, CG, ASA(CW), and prepared briefing materials for presentation to the House and Senate Appropriations committees. In addition, division staff prepared budget testimony for the Chief presenting the water resources challenges, and prepared speeches focused on national water resources needs for presentation at ICWP, TRB, NAFSMA, Arkansas Governor's Council, and Association of American Geographers conferences. * National "Join the Dialogue" initiative supporting the CW program development strategic plan. The strategic plan development effort had a major public outreach component consisting ofa public brochure and fact sheets summarizing national water resources challenges, a public web site, and fourteen regional and two national "listening session" public meetings. Program Analysis Division staff led the team that successfully planned and executed this ambitious public involvement strategy in a highly volaile environment. Over 25,000 brochures were distributed to interested stakeholders and agencies. Some 1,400 persons representing a diverset of interest groups attended the listening sesSiOn meetings. Our public web site had over 8,000 "hits" during the period Mar - Sep. Listening 43-6 INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES sessions were well regarded by the large majority of those attending as providing an open and unbiased forum to voice concerns about water resources issues. Some 536 water resources issues were put forward by listening session attendees. These have been grouped into 18 discreet water resources challenge areas that will be used for updating the CW strategic plan. * Civil Works Planners Training and Development Task Force. Program Analysis Division provided primary analytic support of this high priority Civil Works effort to improve planner capability. Division staff put together the overall concept and charter for the task force effort, and co-chaired the task force effort. The task force completed interviews with planning chiefs to help define problems and needs; successfully initiated a web-based survey for field planners; and created a basic plan formulation "short course" which will be fielded in FY 01. * Value to the Nation Brochures. Program Analysis Division staff managed the development of the "Value to the Nation" brochure on recreation. This brochure describes the value to the nation received from the investment in recreation at Corps projects. Over 50,000 copies of this brochure have been reproduced for distribution at Corps project sites. THE NAVIGATION DATA CENTER (NDC) The Navigation Data Center's (NDC) primary mission is to collect and supply navigation data and information for the purpose of enhancing productivity of both the U.S Army Corps of Engineers and the nation by providing quality and timely information for water transportation - related analysis and decision making. NDC directly supports the USACE navigation, regulatory, emergency and readiness functions as well as those of other Federal, state and local agencies with roles or interests in water transportation. The Office of Management and Budget has designated the USACE, acting through NDC, as the Federal Central Collection Agency for waterborne commerce and vessel activities and waterway infrastructure data and statistics. As the Federal central source, NDC continued its intra- and interagency coordination during FY00. To insure Corps interoperability and minimize data entry, NDC continued the program to link NDC data as well as data from other O&M business areas with the Corps financial data system to produce quality, timely, Performance measures, such as cost per ton-mile of commerce moved. This project, called the Operation and Maintenance Business Information Link (OMBIL), assists the Corps transition to business oriented management. Benefits realized in FY00 abilities were the to link and layer navigation information to gain a more comprehensive understanding of navigation issues. NDC supports data users by supplying information in both standard and custom products. NDC maximizes the use of electronic distribution of information via the internet, the Corps intranet and by combining public data and reports on one annual CD-ROM. Waterborne Commerce and Vessel Statistics NDC continued to provide annual preliminary and final U.S. foreign and domestic vessel, vessel activity and commercial traffic products, plus monthly tonnage estimates, on the internet in order to furnish both the government and the public more accessible and more timely information concerning waterborne commerce statistics. During FY00, the system for automated collection of foreign vessel movements data continued to expand to additional Customs ports. This system, a partnership between Customs and the Corps, now generates over 95% of the vessel movement records in automated form. The dock-specific data is edited at the data input site offering more accurate, more complete, and more timely data at a reduced cost. NDC performed a data quality comparison between vessel manifest-based import/export cargo data versus tradebased import/export data. As a result, NDC will use the manifest-based data as the primary source for our calendar year 2000 official statistics because of its better geographic accuracy, completeness and container information. The trade-based dataset that NDC has supplied in the past will continue to be produced, in 43-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WUKK IURK YUU partnership with the Maritime Administration; so that data users will still have access to the cargo value and commodity specificity strengths of this dataset. Ports and Waterways Infrastructure Supporting the Corps Federal Central Collection Agency responsibility for documenting the nation's port infrastructure which is supported by Federal channels, NDC completed the revision of five of the 56 volume Port Series. These five were completed, distributed, and are available for sale in FY 2000: Port Series (PS) Report No. 10 - Port of Baltimore, Maryland; PS No. 14 - The Ports of Savannah and Brunswick, Georgia; PS No. 43 - The Port of Cleveland, Ohio; PS No. 44 - The Port of Toledo, Ohio; PS No. 49 - The Ports of Duluth, MN; Superior, WI; Taconite Harbor, Silver Bay, and Two Harbors, MN; and Ashland, WI. In addition to the completed reports, field surveys were conducted and data entered into the Ports and Waterways Information Management System (PWIMS) for the following: The Lake Charles section of PS No. 21 - The Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; PS No. 22 - The Ports of Port Arthur, Beaumont, and Orange, TX; PS No. 30 - The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, CA; PS No.31 - The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, CA; PS No. 41 -The Ports of Buffalo, Rochester, Oswego, and Ogdensburg, NY; PS No. 42 - U.S. Ports on Lake Erie (Erie, PA; and Conneaut, Ashtabula, Fairport Harbor, Lorain, Huron, and Sandusky, OH); and PS No. 68 - Ports on the Missouri, Arkansas, Verdigris, White, Ouachita and Red Rivers. The Red River facilities are new additions to the database. In addition to the printed reports, data for the 9,280 individual docks were made available in summary form and as data files on the Internet and Public CD. These data are updated as each port area is re-surveyed and verified as current. Lock Performance and Characteristics The lock performance database was migrated to an ORACLE relational database system. Most lock operators now enter data via a standard web browser directly into the central database residing on a Corps processing center computer. This has provided a near real time capability and a more rapid flow of information to the user. Data reports and files are available to Corps personnel via intranet read-only access to the database reports page. Other lock information, summaries and reports are available to the public on the Navigation Data Center's homepage. Custom reports and summaries are available upon request. Lock characteristics, the physical descriptions of all the Corps owned/operated locks, data are also available on the web to all users. These lock databases are feeder systems to the Operations and Maintenance Business Information Link (OMBIL) decision suporl system. Dredging Statistics This web-based ORACLE database is successful in supplying information on all Corps performed and contracted dredging to the Corps, industry and private users. Data entry and report generation is accomplished via the Corps Intranet and enables all Corps members access to the information in the central system. The database continues to meet user needs with bi-weekly updates of Corps and contract dredging information made available on the public Internet site. In addition to the standard reports and summaries, custom queries and reports are quickly generated to meet user requests. The extensive use of the data by the Corps and industry has resulted in improved bidding competition and a more efficient utilization of dredging equipment. The dredging database is a feeer system to the Operations and Maintenance Business Information Link (OMBIL) decision support system. 43-8 INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION ASSOCIATION (PIANC) The International Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an organization consisting of approximately 42 national members. From its headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, it acts as a clearinghouse of technology and experiences relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements which are exchanged among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical information on port and waterway development. The objective of the Association is met by holding International Congresses and by publishing technical bulletins and special reports. Special reports are published describing the results of the work of international research teams, or working groups, composed of those national members interested in the Particular subject under study. Examples include methods of treatment and disposal of dredged material, flexible revetments in the marine environment, an international survey of dry dock facilities and their characteristics, the wildlife habitat and port management, standards for recreation navigation waterways, and various other topics relating to port and waterway development. The organization also serves as an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate expertise throughout the world on PIANCrelated subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information also is promulgated by members attending the International Congresses held once every four years, and technical working group meetings held several times each year. The business affairs of the Association are managed by the Permanent International Commission (PIC), which in 2000 was renamed the Annual General Assembly (AGA). It is composed represent of delegates who each member government. The number of delegates is determined by the size of the national Ulebership, but may not exceed 11 per country. The United States (U.S.), which has been a member of PIANC since 1902, provides an annual aPpropriation for the support and maintenance of the organization This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International and payment of a portion of the travel expenses of officially appointed national delegates (Commissioners) of the United States to meetings of the AGA and Congresses. Total annual appropriation for the U.S. Section, PIANC is currently $45,000, including the annual subvention of approximately $11,000. The U.S. Section is administered by law, under the auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). It is located in the Institute for Water Resources (IWR), Casey Building, Humphreys Engineer Center. The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and corporate members who pay membership dues. Membership of the U.S. Section on September 30, 2000, totaled 337, consisting of 270 individual members, 66 corporate members and I student member. United States National Commission The United States National Commission constitutes the governing body of the National Section. At the beginning of FY00 the ex-officio offices of the U.S. National Commission were: Chairman, (Dr. Joseph W. Westphal, Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW)); President, (MG Hans A. Van Winkle, Director of Civil Works); and Secretary, (Mr. Thomas M. Ballentine) an employee of IWR. At the beginning of FY00 U. S. National Commissioners were: Mr. Robert D. Nichol, President, Moffatt and Nichol Engineers; Mr. Kurt J. Nagle, President, American Association of Port Authorities; Mr. Charles C. Calhoun, Vice President representing the Central Region of the U. S. Section and consultant; Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, Director, National Ports and Waterways Institute, University of New Orleans; Mr. Joseph H. Pyne, President, Kirby Corporation; Ms. Doris J. Bautch, Chief Division of Ports, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Walter D. Ritchie, Vice President representing the Western Region of the U. S. Section and Vice President, KPFF, Inc.; and Mr. Thomas H. Wakeman, Ill, Vice President representing the Eastern Region of 44-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY00 the U. S. Section and General Manager, Waterways Development Division, Port Commerce Department, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The Treasurer is Captain James R. Carman, (retired,) who formerly served as Chief, Division of Port and Intermodal Planning, Office of Port and Domestic Shipping in the Maritime Administration. Conferences The Port of Oakland served as the host organization for the 2000 annual meeting of the U. S. Section. The theme of the conference, which was held May 3-5, 2000, was Navigation: Meeting Customer Needs for the New Millennium. A specialty workshop on Innovation Sediment Decontamination and Treatment Technologies was held on May 2" in conjunction with the conference. Two former Commissioners, both Californians, were named to the position of Commissioner Emeritus during the conference. The Honorable Joseph W. Westphal, Chairman, U. S. Section, recognized and presented plaques to Colonel Charles R. Roberts, USA (Ret.) who served as a Commissioner from 1986-1993 and to Mr. Charles F. Connors, a member of the Commission from 1989-1997. The U. S. Section also participated in conferences which were sponsored by American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and the National Waterways Conference, Inc. (NWC). On March 20, 2000, the U. S. Section sponsored a breakfast at the Spring meeting in Washington, D. C. of the AAPA. Dr. James F. Johnson, Chief, Planning and Policy Divisions, HQUSACE, was the principal speaker. The theme of Dr. Johnson's remarks was the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers to bring national water resource needs to the attention of national decision-makers. The Association continued the long tradition of holding a PIANC breakfast at the annual meeting of the National Waterways Conference, Inc. Three speakers addressed the subject of Lock Automation and Remote Control of Locks. The speakers, all of whom are with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers were: Dr. Ashok Kumar, Project Leader, Engineer Research and Development Center, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL); Mr. Gary M. Jones, Chief, Mechanical/Electrical Section, U. S. Army Engineer District, St. Louis; and Mr. Michael L. Sommars, Electrical Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer District, St. Louis. The speakers addressed recent developments in lock automation in European countries, activities to automate locks in the St. Louis District and plans to improve the Panama Canal. Mr. Charles C. Calhoun, Vice President, Central Region, represented the U. S. Section of PIANC and served as chairman of the session. On October 22, 1999, a group of 25 members of the U. S. Section who reside in the New York City metropolitan area attended a luncheon sponsored by the Section. The gathering was held at One World Trade Center in the offices of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Ms. Lillian C. Borrone, Director, Port Commerce Department, made welcoming remarks. Dr. John E. Ricklefs, Director of Planning, Moffatt and Nichol Engineers International, spoke on international port planning in the 21' century. Arrangements forthe meeting were made by Mr. Thomas H. Wakeman, I11, Dredging Program Manager, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and a Vice President of the U. S. Section of PIANC. Committees and Commissions The Annual General Assembly (AGA) ofPIANC took action at its meeting on May 17, 2000, to rename the international committees and commissions. The new names followed by the former names which are enclosed by brackets are: Inland Navigation Commission (InCom) I Permanent Technical Committee I]; Maritime Navigation Commission (MarCom) ( Permanent Technical Committee IIl; Recreational Navigation Commission (RecCom) [Pennanent Commission for Sport and Recreational Navigation]; Environmental Commission (EnviCom) [Permanent Environmental Commission]; International Coopersiof Commission (CoCom) I Permanent Committee for Cooperation and Development]. The names0f the Finance Commission, Editing Commissio, Commission for Communication and the Executive Committee were not changed Representatives to Committees and Commissions The U.S. Section representatives to the InCoT, MarCom, RecCom, EnviCom and CoComn were as follows: 44-2 INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES Environmental Commission -- Mr. Ronald G. Vann, Chief, Waterways and Ports Branch, U. S. Army Engineer District, Norfolk. International Cooperation Commission-- Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, National Ports and Waterways Institute, University of New Orleans. Inland Navigation Commission -- Dr. Sandra K. Knight, P.E., USAGE. Engineer Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station, Co-Principal, Tim Parker, Parker Towing Company. Maritime Navigation Commission -- Mr. Thomas H. Wakeman, III, General Manager, Waterways Development Division, Port Commerce Department, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Co-Principal, E Dan Allen, Moffatt & Nichol Engineers. Recreational Navigation Commission -- Mr. John M. Nichol (Retired) and Mr. Richard B. Dornhelm, Vice-President, Moffatt and Nichol Engineers, Co-Principal, Jack C. Cox, PBS&J. Commission for Communications -- Mr. Barry W. Holliday, Chief, Dredging and Navigation Branch, Operations, Construction, Readiness Division, Office of the Chief of Engineers Active Technical Working Groups and Reports Published During the Year During the year two reports were published: MarCom WG 35, Dangerous Goods in Ports, and EnviCom WG 3, Glossary of Environmental Terms and Terminology as Related to PIANC Activities. No new working groups (WG) were approved. The titles of active working groups and the names of the U. S. Representatives are: InCom WG 19, Problems of Collisions Due to the Presence of Bridges, Organized September 1994, Mr. Michael A. Knott, P.E., Moffatt and Nichol Engineers. InCom WG 21, Economic Studies of Inland Waterways. Organized February 1996. Mr. David Grier, USACE, Institute for Water Resources. InCom WG 22, Safety in Inland Navigation. Organized November 1996. RADM William T. MCMullen, Texas A&M, Galveston, Texas. InCom WG 23, Technical and Economic Problems of Channel Icing. Organized December 1997. Mr. Claude Strauser, USACE District, St. Louis. InCom WG 24, Vessel Traffic Management in the Inland Waterways. Organized March 1998. Mr. J. Michael Sollosi, U. S. Coast Guard. InCom WG 25, Maintenance and Renovation of Navigation Infrastructure. Organized July 1999. Mr. James McDonald, USACE, WES and Captain James Blanchar, USACE District, Rock Island. MarCom WG 33, Fenders. Organized January 1996. Mr. Mark T. Faeth, Han-Padron Associates. MarCom WG 34, The Effect of Earthquakes on Port Structures. Organized June 1996. Mr. Bradley P. Erickson, VZM TranSystem Corporation; Valery M. Buslov, Ph.D., Han-Padron Associates; and Stephen E. Dickenson,, Ph.D., Oregon State University. MarCom WG 35, Dangerous Goods in Ports (Handling, Storage and Transportation). Organized October 1996. MarCom WG 36, Catalogue of Precast Elements. Organized October 1996. Dr. Billy L. Edge, Texas- A&M University. MarCom WG 37, Advances in Maritime Intermodal Freight Transportation. Organized September 1997. Mr. M. John Vickerman, VZM TranSystems Corporation. MarCom WG 38, Polar Navigation. Organized December 1997. Orson P. Smith, Ph.D., University of Alaska, Anchorage. MarCom WG 39, Monitoring of Breakwaters. Organized January 1998. Mr. James D. Prehn, RLS, W.F. Baird & Assoc. Ltd. MarCom WG 40, Guidelines for the Designing of Berm Breakwaters. Organized January 1998. Mr. Jeffrey F. Gilman, P.E., Vice President, Peratrovich, Nottingham & Drage, Inc. MarCom WG 41, High-Speed Ferries at Sea and Port Approaches. Organized July 1999. LT.Alan L. Blume, U.S. Coast Guard. 44-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY00 RecCom WG 9, Regeneration of Harbour Areas for Sport and Pleasure Navigation Use. Organized July 1995. Mr. Jack C. Cox, PBS&J Consultants. RecCom WG 10, Provision for Low Cost Moorings for Seasonal Use. Organized July 1995. RecCom WG 11, Waterway Planning for Marinas and Resorts. Organized February 1997. Mr. Ron Stone, National Marine Manufactures Association. RecCom 12, Recreational Navigation and Nature. Organized February 1998. Mr. Scott Jackson USACE Waterways Experiment Station and Mr. Paul E. Donheffner, Oregon State Marine Board. RecCom WG 13, Dredging of Marinas. Organized July 1999. Mr. R. W. Lofgren, Lofgren Imagineering & Construction Company. EnviCom WG 2, Wildlife Habitat and Port Management. Organized March 1995. EnviCom WG 4, Environmental Management System for Ports. Organized January 1996. EnviCom WG 5, Environmental Guidelines for Marine, Nearshore and Inland Confined Disposal Facilities for Contaminated Dredged Material Organized January 1998. Michael C. Palermo, Ph.D., USACE Waterways Experiment Station and Mr. John C. Roberge, Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc. EnviCom WG 6, Ecological and Engineering Guidelines for Sustainable Development of Inland Navigation as Related to Navigation Infrastructure, Organized July 1999. Craig Fischenich, Ph.D., USACE Waterways Experiment Station. EnviCom WG 7, Ecological and Engineering Guidelines for Wetlands Restroration in Relation to the Development, Operation and Maintenance of Navigation Infrastructure. Organized July 1999. Russell Theriot, Ph.D., USACE, Waterways Experiment Station. 44-4 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps divisions and districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation on numerotus international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering, technical. or study boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineers memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 45-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the annual reports, Volume II for fiscal years 1977 and 1980. "TABLE 45-1 International Boundary Waters Boards Having Corps of Engineers Members BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLIISIEI) UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION i. Int. Lake Superior 2. Int. St. Croix River 3. Int. Lake Memphremagog 4. nt. Lake of the Woods Control Board 5. Int. Lake Champlain 6. Int. Kootenay Lake 7. Int. Rainy Lake Board of Control 8. Int. Osoyoos Lake 9. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer Board 10. Int. Niagara 11. Int. St Lawrence River 12. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 13. Int. Niagara Committee 1914 1915 1920 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1948 1953 1953 1953 1955 * Division Engineer, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division *District Engineer, New England District *District Engineer, New York *District Engineer St. Paul - Chairman *District Engineer, New York * 1. District Engineer, Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *District Engineer, St. Paul -- Chairman 1. District Engineer, Seattle 2. *Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA 1. District Engineer, St. Paul - Board Member 2. *Dept. of Interior, BOR, Wash., D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA 1. *Division Engineer, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Wash., D.C. I. *Division Engineer, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division 2. Civil Engineer, Retired 3. New York Power Authority 4. Rochester Institute of Technology 5. Cornell University 1. Division Engineer -- Great Lakes and Ohio River Division 2. Dept. of Commerce, Ann Arbor, MI *Division Engineer, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division 45-1 BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 14. Int. Souris River Board of Control 15. Columbia River Treaty Entities 16. Columbia River Treaty 17. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 1959 1964 1964 1975 18. Study Team 1999 1. District Engineer, St. Paul - Board Member 2. *ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismarck, ND 1. Division Engineer, Northwestern Division 2. *Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR 1. *HQUSACE, CECW-ZB, Wash., D.C. 2. Department of Energy, Tucson, AZ 1. *New York Dept. Environmental Conservation 2. District Engineer, New York 3. Vermont Environmental Conservation. Agency 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS, Boston, MA 1. *Deputy Conmmander, Great Lakes Regional Office, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division 2. Bureau of Reclamation 3. Great Lakes Commission. 4. Council of Great Lakes Governors 5. U.S. Geological Survey 6. Western Sates Water Council * Signifies U.S. Section Chairman Protection of the Waters of the Great Lakes Under the February 10, 1999, Reference A final report, "Protection of the Waters of the Great Lakes" was submitted to the U.S. and Canadian Governments on February 22, 2000 by the 12-member Study Team. The Study Team was co-chaired by the Deputy Commander of the Great Lakes Regional Office, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Because there is uncertainty about the availability of Great Lakes water to meet all ecosystem needs, including human needs, over the long term, the report concludes that water should be managed with caution to protect the resource for the future. It also concludes that international trade law obligations, including the provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), do not prevent Canada and the United States from taking measures to protect their water resources and preserving the integrity of the Great Lakes basin ecosystem so long as there is no discrimination against individuals from other countries in the application of those measures. The report recommends that federal, state and provincial governments should not authorize or permit any new removals, and should exercise caution with respect to major new or increased consumptive use, until these standards have been promulgated or until 24 months have passed, whichever comes first. States and provinces should also build on the Great Lakes Charter by developing a broader range of consultation procedures than currently exist. The Final Report responds to the request made by the governments of Canada and the United States in their February 10, 1999 Water Uses Reference for recommendations for the protection of the Great Lakes. The IJC previously issued an Interim Report under this Reference on August 18, 1999. Since issuing its Interim Report, the IJC has obtained additional information frolm a variety of sources, including 12 public hearings. 45-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT - This page intentionally left blank - 46-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various construction related activities in U. S. waters and wetlands: Sections 9 and 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (structures in waterways and the alteration of waterways); Section 103 of the Marine, Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Ocean Dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged or fill material). Work Completed. During FY 2000, the Corps reviewed and authorized approximately 88,500 permit activities, 90 percent of which were approved within 60 days. About 6400 projects were issued individual permits, and another 82,000 activities were reviewed and approved under regional or nationwide general permits. General permits are issued to the public at large and define types of minor activities with no more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment, which do not usually require the extensive review necessary for projects authorized by individual permits. Use of general permits provides significant relief to the regulated public by avoiding red tape for small projects with minimal environmental impacts. The Corps denied only about 200 Permits during FY 2000 since most projects which might otherwise have been denied a Permit were either modified or conditioned to meet Corps requirements, scaled down to qualify for approval under general permits, or withdrawn. About 3,300 permit applications were either withdrawn or canceled. Under regulatory the program, the Corps made over 60,000 Jurisdiction determinations in FY 2000, many of which were made in response to requests from landowners who were not applying for permits The Corps investigated approximately 6,000 alleged illegal activities, most of which were violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Under the permit program in FY 2000, the Corps authorized the filling of approximately 18,900 acres of wetlands but required the restoration, enhancement, or creation of approximately 44,800 wetland acres. During FY 2000, the Corps initiated an Administrative Appeals process for applicant's who have had their permit denied, or believe that the conditions of an issued permit are so onerous that the applicant considers the conditions as a denial of their application. Appeals of jurisdiction determinations are also included. In March 2000, the Corps issued new Nationwide Permits. These were intended to increase the protection of the Nation's aquatic resources, with particular attention to protection of the Nation's 100 year floodplains. 47-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 99 Allotments Total Funds Available Obligations Unobligated Balance- 30 Sep 00 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 99 Allotment Total Funds Available Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 00 Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1988, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable $ 4,457,336 $ 117,000,000 $ 121,457,336 $ 111,037,788 $ 10,419,548 $ 6,837,237 $ 117,000,000 $ 123,837,237 $ 111,336,717 12,500,521 waters and removed those obstructing navigation For obligation expenditures, see Table B. 47-2 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL AND NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES TABLE B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS ($000) Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 99 Allotment Total Funds Available Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 00 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 99 Allotment $ 3,258 500 503,258 1,061 $ 502,197 $ 3,258 500 $ 503,258 1,061 $ 502,197 Total Funds Available Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 00 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 12656, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies in order to undertake the national emergency planning and preparedness activities necessary to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and national security needs during major domestic crises (including catastrophic disasters) and national security emergencies. Status. During FY 2000, the Corps of Engineers continued its effort to improve the command's readiness posture and its ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis on those activities to prepare for catastrophic natural and technological disasters and to improve Continuity of Government (COG) programs was continued. The primary focus during FY 2000 was to provide support to two major national level civil planning areas: (a) "support to the nation" ability to mobilize national assets to meet natinal/regional level emergencies to continuity of government and ancdo n(tbi)n usiutyp port of Operations during national emergencies. Lessons learned from Midwest Floods of 1993, as well as those gleaned from events such as Hurricanes Hugo, Andrew and Iniki, Loma Prieta and Northridge Earthquakes and the evolving New Madrid Earthquake scenario, clearly indicate that, while the Federal Response Plan is a solid response system, it does not provide for response to disasters with national implications in a way that is sufficiently timely or comprehensive. To alleviate this situation, the Corps is developing scenario specific plans for catastrophic disasters with the intent to exercise these plans. Such exercises, which will involve federal, state and local officials, should lead to a more timely and effective execution of Corps responsibilities during disasters that have national impacts. One of the more significant exercises being planned involves a Los Angeles Earthquake scenario, that is scheduled for December 2000. The purpose of this exercise will be to bring together federal, state, regional, and local government officials for candid, solution-focused exchanges on intergovernmental preparedness for a catastrophic earthquake event in Southern California. Emphasis will be on intergovernmental collaboration and exchange of ideas. Other activities include a continuation of the planning for and maintenance of emergency facilities needed to support continuity of operations. For National Emergency Preparedness fiscal year obligations and expenditures, see Table C. 47-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 99 Appropriations FY 00 774,381 5,000,000 $ 5,774,381 Total Funds Available 4,749,974 Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 00 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 99 Appropriations FY 00 Total Funds Available Expenditures 692,572 $ 1,147,124 5,000,000 $ 6,147,124 4,498,054 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 00 $ 1,649,070 47-4 CIVIL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Authority. Public Law 84-99 (33 U.S.C. 70 n) (69 Stat. 186) provides the authority for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide a full spectrum of emergency management/disaster mistance activities using the Flood Control and Coaal Emergencies (FCCE) appropriation. Under PL 84-99, the Chief of Engineers, acting for the Secretary of the Army, is authorized to undertake activities including disaster preparedness for all natural disasters, Advance Measures (preventive measures when faced with a imminent threat of unusual flooding), emergency operations (Flood Response and Post Flood Response), rehabilitation of flood control works damaged by flood or coastal storm, protection or repair of federally authorized shore potective works threatened or damaged by coastal storm, and provision of emergency water due to drought or contaminated water source. Under The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief md Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) (88 Stat. 143) (The Stafford Act), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may direct USACE to use its resources to provide assistance in the event of a major disaster or emergency declaration by the Pridt. Under The Stafford Act and its implementing Federal Response Plan, USACE has a standing mission to provide assistance in the area of Public Works and Engineering, Emergency Support Function #3, for response to a mjor disaster or catastrophic event. Activities. Overall, the Civil Emergency Management Program ensures taiely, effective, and efficient disaster epardness, response, recovery, and mitigation Projects and services on a nationwide basis to rduce loss of life and property damage under DOD, USACE, FEMA, and other agencies' adhorities. Major disaster preparedness activities included: the review and updating of d preparedness and response plans to sue viability; training personnel to ensure tir capability to respond to disasters; Pocurement and propositioning of critical Quipment and supplies which would likely not beavaiable during initial stages of a response; PeiOdic xercises to test and evaluate plans, Peoel and training; and the inspection of P040 1 and non-Federal flood control projects to ensure their viability to provide flood protection. For each specific event, as needed, Headquarters augments its staff and the staffs of the victim division/district(s) to manage the event, addressing areas such as resource allocations (dollars and people), funding emergency contracts, purchasing needed materials, providing technical and direct assistance, the logistics of moving people and materials, and coordinating with tribal/Federal/state/local agencies involved in the event. These augmentation activities include overtime for Headquarters and field staff, emergency contracts, travel to the event area, purchasing materials and supplies, increased staffing to include Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMA), and providing Remote Sensing/ Geographic Information System (RS/GIS) services. Significant Events. In 2000, the Corps responded to/provided recovery assistance for over two dozen national emergencies and disasters, including the Cerro Grande fire in Los Alamos, NM; a number of hurricanes, including Hurricane Floyd that hit the East Coast in September of 1999 killing 75 people, causing $6.0 billion in damages, and necessitating a half dozen levee rehabilitations, including the historic town of Princeville, NC;. a drought affecting the Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas; ice jam flooding in Pennsylvania; and flood events in San Antonio, TX, Tillamook, OR, the Central Valley of California, and other locations. During 2000, the Corps responded to requirements for flood fighting, debris removal, drought assistance, emergency power, the supply of ice and water, temporary housing, and direct and technical assistance. In FY2000, approximately $50M of Corps funds were expended on disaster response and recovery operations under PL 84-99 authorities, and another $100M in funds were expended to execute FEMA missions. 48-1 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project eight Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Dierks Gillham Yukon Kuskokwim Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Ouachita Damn Arkansas Ouachita Red Red Red Chena River Skunk Creek Bill Wms. River Cave Creek Dreamy Draw New River Gila River Santa Rosa Wash Queen Creek Ouachita Petit Jean River Caddo Rolling Fork River Saline River Cossatot River Fairbanks Phoenix Wenden Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Gila Bend Casa Grande Superior Hot Springs Paris Arkadelphia DeQueen Dierks Gillham 1979 1982 1968 1979 1973 1985 1959 1974 960 1955 1947 1971 1977 1975 1975 2,000 18,350 1,045,300 46,600 320 43,520 2,476,340 198,550 34,500 2,768,500 257,900 881,900 136,100 96,800 221,800 NPP NPP 560 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP 20,900 2,910 6,400 1,680 1,360 1,370 FR Earth FR Earth FRSWX Earth FRX FRX F FR GWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth F Earth FP FRWX FPRSQN FSQRW Earth Earth Earth Earth FSRAW Earth & Rock FSQW Earth & Rock 50 40,200 109 283 109 50 104 181 75.5 2,275 975 2,275 448 2,320 4,780 12,500 25 978 235 115 243 160 153 160 1,100 2,800 3,400 2,360 2,500 1,750 A-1 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Millwood Narrows Danm Nimrnod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Damn H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Farmington Fullerton Hansen Harry L. Englebright Hidden Darn- Hensley Lake Isabella Red Ouachita Arkansas Sacramento Santa Ana San Joaquin Santa Ana Russian Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Little River Little Missouri Fourche LaFve River Stony Creek Brea Creek Chowchilla River Carbon Canyon River East Fork Russian River Dry Creek Littlejohn Creek East Fullerton Crk Big Tujunga Wash Yuba River Fresno River Kern River Ashdown Murfreesboro Plainview Orland Fullerton Chowchilla Brea Ukiah Healdsburg Farmington Fullerton Los Angeles Marysville Madera Bakersfield 1966 1949 1942 1963 1942 1975 1961 1959 1983 1952 1941 1940 1941 1975 1953 1,854,930 407,900 336,010 160,000 4,009 150,000 6,614 122,500 381,000 52,000 764 51,000 69,000 90,000 570,000 29,200 2,500 3,550 770 NPP 470 NPP 1,700 500 NPP NPP 120 400 5,000 1,850 FSW FP FSWX FIRX FR FIRW FR FRXS FRSW F FR FRX DR FIRW FIRW Earth Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth 88 175 97 156 87 205.5 99 160 319 60 46 97 280 163 185 Length (Feet) 17,554 941 1,012 2,970 1,765 1,800 2,150 3,500 3,000 7,800 575 10,475 1,142 5,730 4,952 A-2 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork, American River Pine Flat Prado Redbank and Fancher Creeks San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Success Terminus Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin Mojave San Joaquin Sacramento Pacoima Wash Martis Creek Bear Creek Burns Creek Mariposa Creek Owens Creek Mojave River Calaveras River American River San Joaquin Kings River Santa Ana San Joaquin Santa Ana River Fancher Creek Santa Ana San Antonio Creek San Gabriel San Gabriel River Los Angeles Los Angeles River San Joaquin Tule River San Joaquin Kaweah River San Fernando Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs Auburn Piedra Corona Fresno Upland Duarte Van Nuys Porterville Visalia 1954 1971 1954 1950 1948 1949 1971 1963 1939 1954 1941 1993 1956 1949 1941 1960 1961 440 20,400 7,700 7,000 15,000 3,600 89,669 325,000 14,700 1,000,000 196,235 9,712 7,703 32,109 17,425 85,000 150,000 NPP 71 NPP NP NPP NPP NPP 715 280 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP 400 345 F Earth FSR Earth F F F F FR FIRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock DR Coincrete FIRX Concrete FRWX Earth F Earth FX Earth FRX Earth FR Earth FIRX Earth FIRX Earth 50 113 92 55 88 75 106 210 1,333 2,670 1,830 4,075 1,330 790 1,250 1,960 155 620 429 106 1,820 2,280 44 16,135 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 142 250 3,490 2,375 A-3 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Whittier Narrows San Gabriel San Gabriel El Monte 1957 49,143 NPP FRX Earth 56 River and Rio Hondo COLORADO Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Bear Creek South Platte River Cherry Creek Arkansas River Purgatoire River Housatonic Branch Brook Connecticut West Branch, Farmington River Housatonic Hancock Brook Housatonic Hop Brook Thames Natchaug River Thames Northfield Brook Housatonic Naugatuck River Thames Quinebaug River Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson 1978 1974 1950 1943 1977 1970 1969 1960 1968 1952 1965 1960 1965 30,810 231,429 93,920 605,115 124,463 8,700 97,700 4,030 6,970 52,000 2,430 42,000 26,800 109 1,412 852 1,844 563 20 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FRX Earth FRX Earth FRX Earth FIR Concrete & Earth FIRX Earth FR Earth FRSX Earth FRW FR FRW FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth F Earth FRW Earth 180 148 141 106 200 154 223 57 97 68 118 142 5,300 12,400 14,300 13,962 6,610 933 1,300 630 520 12,420 810 2,000 70 2,550 A-4 Length (Feet) 16,960 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project eight Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool(NPP) Functions Type (Feet) IDAHO Lucky Peak ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden J. Edward Roush Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie Columbia Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Boise River Boise Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamon ie Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Tere Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash 1955 1967 1951 1951 1970 1970 1974 1952 1960 1969 1967 1964 1978 1966 306,000 983,000 15,500 3,780 684,000 294,000 359,600 228,120 132,800 153,100 368,400 441,000 301,600 263,600 2,820 26,000 NPP NPP 11,100 18,900 2,250 1,400 1,100 500 1,100 3,280 2,010 976 FIR Earth FSNRWA Earth F Earth F Earth FSNRW Earth FQRSW Earth FRSW Earth& Rock FRX Earth FRX Earth FRW Earth FRW Earth FARS Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRW Earth 340 2,340 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 182 3,000 150 117 91 137 93 84 950 1,790 5,332 8,100 1,400 1,550 133 6,100 A-5 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Damn Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) IOWA Coralville Red Rock Rathbun Saylorville KANSAS Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvern Milford Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Missouri Upper Mississippi Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Iowa River Des Moines River Chariton River Des Moines River Wakarusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marais des Cygnes Republican River Iowa City Des Moines Centerville Des Moines Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Hillsdale Burlington Marquette Marion Melvern Junction City 1958 1969 1969 1975 1977 1964 1981 1966 1949 1981 1964 1948 1968 1972 1965 475,000 1,717,235 552,000 585,000 397,200 112,882 246,882 287,200 254,900 160,000 626,000 450,000 141,890 363,000 5,430 19,000 FARWQ Earth FARWQ Earth 11,000 FNRWXQS Earth 5,950 FARWQS Earth 7,000 3,259 8,400 4,440 2,330 4,580 9671 3,815 6,210 6,930 FSWXRQ Earth & Rock FSQR Earth FSQRW FSQWR FSWQR FSQRWX FSQRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FRWXS Earth FRQS Earth FRQWXS Earth 1,160,000 15,600 FRSXWN Earth Rock 100 110 86 105 1,400 5,676 10,600 6,750 114 9,250 96 6,500 99 107 94 75 86.5 131 20,930 4,840 6,015 11,600 21,790 15,360 67 8,795 98 9.700 126 6,300 Length (Feet) APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Damn Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Creek Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Big Hill Creek Deleware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Length (Feet) Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsville Pikeville 1981 1969 1963 1960 1962 1964 1964 1960 1976 1974 1949 1968 39,540 770,000 230,000 200,800 2,346,000 776,000 815,200 168,000 47,700 614,100 93,000 164,360 1,190 12,500 4,000 2,660 15,800 9,000 4,340 550 530 6,790 1,100 569 FSRW FRSXWN FRSWXQ FSQWR FRWXQNS FIRWXN FARS FQRW FQRW FQRW FARW FARW Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Rock 83 96 85 90 157 160 146 162 130 148 118 195 3,902 7,750 7,750 4,712 7,500 5,600 3,970 1,020 720 2,740 913 1,100 A-7 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Darn Name Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville Yatesville LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake River Basin Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Stream Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Blaine Creek Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Community in Vicinity Grayson Campbellsville Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Taylorsville Yatesville Shreveport Shreveport Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1967 1969 1978 1983 1963 1958 1983 1988 1949 1971 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 118,990 723,200 21,00 73,500 609,400 334,400 291,670 86,951 357,300 175,000 Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) 1,050 5,070 578 261 2,890 2,180 1,625 3,921 NPP F 32,700 Project unctions Type FQRW Earth & Rock FRSQW Earth & Rock FQ Concrete FQRW Earth & Rock FAR Earth & Rock FRX Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FRW Earth Height (Feet) 120 142 97 160 174 124 164 105 Length (Feet) 1,460 2,350 574 1,600 990 1,530 1,280 760 70 12,850 NFRS Concrete & Earth 3,700 A-8 ... ... .. m ....._ F Chaactritic ofDa APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Name Wallace Lake MARYLAND Jennings Randolph Lake MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Charles River Natural Valley Storage Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village River Basin Red Potomac Connecticut Connecticut Thames Charles Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Stream Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers River little River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Community in Vicinity Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Roylaston Charlton Millis Monson Fiskdale Oxford Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1946 1981 1958 1941 1958 1983 1966 1960 1959 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 96,100 130,900 24,000 49,900 12,700 35,000 3,740 30,000 12,800 Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) 2,300 952 NPP NPP 200 NPP NPP 360 NPP Project Functions FQRS FQRSW FRW FRW FRW F F FRW FRW Height (Feet) 30 296 62 56 66 85 55 55 Type Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Nonstructural Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Length (Feet) 4,994 2,130 885 1,400 3,255 1,050 520 2,140 A-9 CfDh aarateritics W . .. .. . am"m .. APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Name Knightville Littleville Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River (HWY 75) Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River LacQui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake River Basin Connecticut Connecticut Connnecticut Blackstone Thames Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Red River Red River Stream Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Tully River West River Qu inebaug River Minnesota River Chippewa River Minnesota River Minnesota River Otter Tail River of the North Red Lake River of the North Community in Vicinity Huntington Chester Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Odessa Watson Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red Lake Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1941 1965 1949 1960 1961 1974 1950 1950 1953 1953 1951 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 49,000 32,400 22,000 12,350 11,100 45,000 (1) 158,700 35,900 14,100 3,270,000 Characteristics of Darn Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) NPP 275 300 NPP 23 12,700 NPP 7,750 8,100 790 288,800 Project Functions FRW FRWS FRW FRW FRW FRW FRWX FRWX FARS FARS FARSX Type Earth Rock Earth Rock Earth Rock Earth & Rock Earth Rock Earth Rolled Earth Rolled Earth ERaorltlhed Rolled Earth Earth Rock Height (Feet) 160 1,164 62 51 78 25 23.3 25 19. 5 47 15.5 A-10 Length (Feet) 1,200 1,360 1,570 2,400 560 13,700 17,975 4,100 11,800 1,355 36,500 Characotfe rDisatnicas . ..... ..0 .m APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Name MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch Little Blue River Lakes Blue Springs Longview River Basin Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Pascagoula Lower Mississippi White Grand Chariton Missouri Missouri Stream Coldwater River Yocona River Mississippi Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek Little Tallahatchie Rivere Black River Little Charlton Little Blue River Little Blue River Community in Vicinity Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon Kansas City Kansas City Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1945 1952 1954 1969 1940 1948 1980 1988 1986 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 525,300 660,000 1,337,400 142,400 1,570,000 413,700 65,000 26,600 46,900 Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Project Pool (NPP) Project P(NooPl P) Functions 5,100 F 6,100 F 9,800 F 1,280 FQSR 10,700 F 1,630 2,430 560 930 FRWX FRSQW FRW FRWQ A-11 Type Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Eanh & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth Ileight (Feet) 81 99 102 67 117 154 71 78 120 Length (Feet) 11,500 8,400 13,900 6,543 15,300 4,225 3,800 2,500 1,900 Doafm Characteristics mmmmlpw ww APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Lel Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Tye (Feet) (F Pomme de Terre Missouri Pomme de Hermitage 1961 650,000 7,820 FRWXA Earth 155 4, Smithville Wappapello NEBRASKA Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear (Site 16) Ed Zorinsky (Site 18) Wehrspann (Site 20) Salt Creek & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Blue Stem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach Site (9) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Missouri Lower Mississippi Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Terre River Little Platte River St. Francis River Republican Riv Knight Creek Trib of Big Papillion Creek Boxelder Creek S. Papillion Creek S. Trib. Olive Br. Creek N. Trib Olive Br. Creek N. Trib. Hickman Creek S. Trib. Hickman Creek Cardwell Creek Smithville Wappapello Republican City Omaha Omaha Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland Hickman Denton 1982 1941 1952 1975 1973 1991 1991 1964 1963 1963 1964 1966 A-1 2 246,500 613,200 850,000 17910 5,220 6,910 1,990 5,470 10,260 9,280 6,640 7,560 7,190 4,100 13,600 391 137 418 203 174 316 303 196 208 FSQRW FR FIRWXA FQEX FRX FR FR FR FR FR FB & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FR Earth 95 109 107 67 70 64 59 45 57 52 48 ngth eet) 630 4,200 2,700 11,827 1,940 1,460 11,400 11,810 3,020 2,760 1,650 2,250 52 3,100 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Le Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (F ngth eet) Conestoga (Site 12) Town Lake (Site 13) Pawnee (Site 14) Holmes Park Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO Abiquiu Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut Colorado Colorado Holmes Creek Middle Creek N. Middle Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset River Contoocook River Piscataquog River Otter Brook Ashuelot River Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon Denton Pleasantdale Emerald Lincoln Raymond Webster West Peterborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Caliente Rio Grande Rio Charma Abiquiu 1964 1966 1965 1963 1968 1941 1950 1943 1962 1962 1958 1941 1957 1957 10,640 8,080 29,520 6,510 97,560 46,000 12,800 154,000 71,500 87,500 18,300 32,500 6,271 7,747 1963 1,192,800 230 255 728 100 1,780 NPP NPP NPP 200 120 85 265 NPP NPP NPP FR FR FR FR FR FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FX FX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FXS Earth A-13 63 65 55 70 75 67 140 76 115 133 86 71 92 325 3,000 5,000 7,700 5,200 1,150 1,030 1,740 790 2,000 1,288 1,670 800 884 1,540 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Le Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (F Cochiti Rio Grande Rio Grande Pena Blanca 1975 582,019 1,200 FRWX Earth 241 28 ngth eet) ,300 Conchas Galisteo Jemez Canyon Santa Rosa Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott Arkansas Rio Grrande Rio Grande Pecos Pecos Pecos Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin Pee Dee Canadian River Galisteo Creek Jemez River Pecos Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyoo Canacadea Crk Canisteo Crk Tucumcari Santa Fe Bernailillo Santa Rosa Roswell Hornell Arkport Ouleout Crk Franklin Genesee River Otselic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Mount Morris Whitney Point Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro 1939 1970 1953 1979 1963 1949 1940 1950 1952 1942 1982 1983 1963 513,900 89,468 97,425 438,364 163,775 14,005 7,900 33,550 337,000 86,440 753,500 335,620 153,000 2,694 NPP NPP NPP NPP 162 NPP 210 170 1,200 14,300 11,300 1,470 FI Concrete & Earth FX Earth FX Earth FIX Earth FX Earth FRW Earth F Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FR Concrete FRW Earth FQRSWX FQRSWX FARSX Earth Earth Earth 200 156 146.6 212 998 118 90 113 19,400 2,820 780 1,950 4,885 2,940 1,260 1,200 130 2,010 210 1,028 95 4,900 112 92 148 1,330 1,915 1,740 A-14 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ( n gth 'eet) NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem OHIO Alum Creek Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Dillon Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Red River of the North Missouri Red River of the North James River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Sheyenne River North Fork, Grand River South Branch of Park River Pipestem Creek Alum Creek Mahoning Creek Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Olen Tangy River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Valley City Haley Park River Jamestown Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Deleware Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland 101,365 92,980 6,700 146,880 134,800 91,200 242,200 63,700 102,500 273,000 273,000 78,700 104,100 1951 1967 1953 1974 1975 1943 1978 1974 1968 1961 1961 1966 1944 A-15 5,430 1,750 194 885 348 240 13,300 1,010, 727 1,325 1,325 580 700 FARS FSRWK FARS FRWX FRSW FARSWQ FRSQW FQRW FRW FRWX FRWX FAQRSW FARSWQ Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 61 79 67 108 93 96 165 72 93 118 118 83 47 1,650 5,730 865 4,000 10,000 5,750 2,750 6,620 3,880 1,400 1,400 9,900 5,650 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dan Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ( ength Feet) Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek North Branch, Kokosing River Lake Paint Creek Tom Jenkins West Fork Mill Creek Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhondoing Riv Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Fork Little Stillwater Crk Wills Creek North Branch of Kokosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Mifflin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mt Healthy 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1937 1937 1936 1937 1938 1937 1936 1937 1973 1972 1951 1952 49,700 71,700 149,600 88,000 54,000 203,000 37,400 285,000 102,000 65,000 87,700 88,500 61,60-0 196,000 14,900 145,000 26,900 11,380 1,540 420 NPP 1,350 1,800 350 1,000 NPP NPP 2,270 850 3,550 2,350 900 98 710 394 200 FRX Earth FIRC Earth FR Earth FRX Earth FRX Earth FRX Concrete FRX Earth FR Earth FR Earth FRX Earth FRX FRSX FRX Earth Earth Earth FRX Earth FRW Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRSWX Concrete FRX Earth 65 3,700 64 87 48 64 83 74 111 46 56 113 45 52 87 71 5,600 6,300 1,390 950 824 1,694 2,330 1,220 1,750 775 2,350 1,550 1,950 1,400 118 700 84 944 100 1,100 A- 6 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or NoHeight L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ( William H. Harsha Ohio Little Miami Williamsburg 1978 284,500 18,760 FRSQW Earth 200 1 River ength Feet) ,450 OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah Optima Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Red Arkansas Deep Fork River Birch Creek North Canadian River Little Caney River Wolf Creek Salt Fork of the Arkansas River Polecat Creek Kiamichi River Caney River Arkansas River Verdigris River North Canadian River Little River Jackfork Creek Hominy Creek Beaver Creek Poteau River Edmond Barnsdall Canton Copan Fort Supply Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Bartlesville Ponca City Oologah Hardesty Wright City Clayton Skiatook Waurika Wister 1986 1977 1948 1983 1942 1941 1950 1974 1951 1976 1963 1978 1969 1982 1984 1977 1949 92,010 59,030 383,800 227,700 100,700 271,400 55,395 955,200 289,000 1,327,160 1,559,270 229,500 465,780 396,900 500,700 325,680 427,480 1,820 1,145 3,800 4,850 1,820 8,690 880 13,140 3,570 16,750 31,040 5,340 3,750 13,610 10,190 10,100 7,386 FSR Earth FSQRW Earth FSIRW Earth FSQRWN Earth FSX Earth FRWX Earth FRWXS FSQRW FSQRNW FSQRWN FSNRW FSRW FSQWR FSRW FSQRW FISQWR FSAXWR Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 102 5,250 97 68 3,190 15,140 73 7,730 85 68 89 101 94 125 137 120 124 101 143 106 99 11,865 6,010 2,920 10,200 5,200 9,466 4,000 15,200 7,712 14,138 3,590 16,637 5,700 A-17 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP Functions Type (Feet) ( ength Feet) OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge Willow Creek PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Rogue Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Susquehanna Applegate River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom River Willow Creek Kettle Creek Medford Blue River Cottage Grv Cottage Grv Eugene Eugene Heppner Renovo 1981 1968 1942 1949 1965 1941 1983 1962 82,000 85,000 30,060 70,500 115,000 110,000 13,250 75,000 988 975 1,155 1,885 1,865 10,305 96 160 AFIQRSW Gravel Embankment FINR Earth FINR Concrete & Earth FINR Concrete & Earth FINR Rockfill & Concrete FINR Rockfill & Concrete FRN Roller Compacted Concrete FRWQ Earth & Rock 242 319 114 1,300 1,329 2,110 145 3,352 193 5,100 49 6,624 160 1,780 165 1,350 A-I 8 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Damn Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ( Aylesworth Creek Susquehanna Aylesworth Archbald 1970 1,700 64 FRQ Earth 90 1 Creek & Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Hammond Lake Pohopoco Creek Tulpehocken Creek Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Crooked Creek Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Lawrenceville Ford City Curwensville Wilcox Blanchard White Haven Honesdale Tioga 1971 1978 1952 1980 1940 1965 1952 1969 1961 1960 1978 68,250 50,010 262,700 89,000 93,900 124,200 84,300 99,000 109,610 24,500 63.000 947 960 800 1085 350 790 90 1,730 80 NPP 680 Rock FQRSWA Earth & Rock FAQRSW Earth FW & Rock Concrete & Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRW Earth FRS Earth FARQW Earth FRWQ Earth FRW Earth & Rock F Earth FRQW Earth & Rock 170 ength Feet) 1,270 4,560 98 1,775 137 1,265 151 3,100 143 131 1,480 2,850 184 1,725 100 6,835 234 109 122 3,000 1,255 6,450 A-19 Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Pennanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ( Functions Type (Feet) (] Indian Rock Susquehanna Codorus Creek York 1942 28,000 NPP F Earth 83 1 & Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenango Stillwater Tioga Lake Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Crk West Branch, Lackawaxen River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenango River Lackawanna River Tioga River Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsville Uniondale Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence 1965 1942 1941 1960 1973 1966 1960 1978 1940 1970 1973 1943 1,180,000 95,300 74,200 52,000 762,000 191,400 12,000 62,000 133,400 47,640 20,000 254,000 1,900 210 170 290 8,300 1,910 85 470 480 NPP 118 450 Rock PFAQRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete FRW Earth FRWPQ Earth & Rock FAQRW Concrete FS Earth FRQW Earth & Rock FRW Earth F Earth FQRA Earth FARWQ Earth 1'77 ength Feet) ,000 1,877 114 960 162 926 140 225 1,200 1,700 68 720 77 1,700 140 154 88 90 184 2,710 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 A-20 Kinzua Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP Functions Type (Feet) ( ength Feet) SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Damn White Rock TEXAS Addicks Aquilla Barker Belton Benbrook Canyon Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' the Pines Granger Damn and Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Joe Pool Jim Chapman Lake Missouri Missouri Red River of the North Red River of the North San Jacinto Brazos San Jacinto Brazos Trinity Guadalupe Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Trrinity Red Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Bois de Sioux River Bois de Sioux River South Mayde Crk Aquilla Creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadalupe River Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Hords Creek Mountain Creek Sulphur River Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Hillsboro Barker Belton Fort Worth New Braunfels Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Grand Prairie Cooper 1953 1970 1941 1941 1948 7,200 8,385 177,000 96,000 204,500 1983 146,000 1945 207,000 1954 1,097,600 1952 1964 1959 1980 1952 1948 1986 1991 258,600 36 41 FRWX Earth FRWX Earth 10,925 FRX 3,850 FRX NPP 3,280 NPP 12,300 3,770 366,400 346,400 842,100 244,200 425,500 25,310 304,000 441,200 18,700 4,400 7,280 510 7,470 19,305 Rolled Earth Rolled Earth FX Earth FSX FX FIRSX Earth Earth Earth FNRXA Earth FRSX Earth FRS Earth FRSWX Earth FNRSXA FARSX FRSX Earth Earth Earth FRSWX Earth 127 123 925 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 49 61,166 104.5 27 192 11,890 72,844 5,524 130 9,130 224 4,410 97 10,600 115 137 91 109 16,320 12,850 6,800 22,360 79 28,070 A-21 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Proect Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ( Lavon Trinity East Fork, Fort Worth 1953 748,200 21,400 FRSW Earth 81 1 Lewisville Navanrro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Ray Roberts Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman UTAH Little Dell Lake Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Elm Fork Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River Jordan River Dell Creek Trinity River Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Arthur City Comanche Denton Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Salt Lake City 1954 1962 1980 1952 1967 1963 1987 1967 1968 1965 989,700 212,200 130,800 396,400 182,940 374,200 1,064,600 507,500 630,400 726,400 23,280 5,070 1,310 5,440 5,940 4,610 29,350 11,460 6,430 7,270 1957 2,654,300 20,300 1993 20,500 1,000 FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSWX Rock FRSX Earth FRSW Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Concrete & Earth FRSX Earth FS Earth ength Feet) 9,483 125 32,888 82 164 6,700 6,700 128 40,885 96 86 109 80 200 145 100 224 7,080 13,460 14,965 26,175 15,624 24,618 18,500 1,700 VERMONT Ball Mountain Connecticut West River Jamaica 1961 54,600 75 FRW Concrete & Earth A-22 Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Trinity Brazos Brazos Brazos Red 265 915 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Dam Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) North Hartland Connecticut Ottauguechee North 1960 71,420 220 FRW Con- 185 1 River Hartland crete North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Gathright Darn & Lake Moomaw North Fork of Pound River WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain Connecticut Black River Springfield Connecticut West River Connecticut Ompompanoosuc River Townshend Union Village Pound River Haysi Jackson North Fork of Pound Green River Mill Creek White River Alleghany Pound Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw 1960 1961 1950 1963 1979 1968 1961 1942 1953 51,067 33,700 38,000 145,700 123,739 11,300 106,000 8,300 106,000 290 100 NPP 310 2,532 349 1,600 225 NPP & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FAWR Concrete & Earth FQR Earth & Rock FRSW Earth & Rock FAS Rock FR Earth FR Rock 120 133 170 250 257 ength Feet) 1,520 2,940 1,700 1,100 960 1,172 122 600 235 125 427 500 3,200 810 A-23 Ohio James Ohio Green Columbia Puyallup APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 Characteristics of Damn Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height L Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful OP (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) ( ength Feet) WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn R. D. Bailey Stonewall Jackson Lake Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River WISCONISIN Eau Galle Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Chippewa Beech Fork Lavalette New River Hinton Little Kanawha Twelvepole Creek Guyandotte River West Fork Gauley River Elk River Burnsville East Lynn Justice Weston Summersville Sutton Tygart River Grafton Eau Galle Spring Valley 1977 1952 1977 1970 1979 1988 1965 1960 1938 1969 37,540 631,000 65,400 82,500 203,700 74,650 413,800 265,300 287,700 43,600 450 1,800 550 823 440 360 407 270 620 153 FRW Earth FRWX Concrete FQRW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FAQAS Concrete FANR Rock FNAR Concrete FNAR Concrete FR Earth 86 180 1,080 2,048 89 1,400 122 650 310 1,397 95 620 390 220 230 2,280 1,921 1,921 122 1,800 Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) A-24 KEY FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS: A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 2000 X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation A-25 APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers But Operated by Others September 30, 2000 Name CCAALLIIFFOORRNNIIAA Big Dry Creek Camanche Cherry Valley Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar New Don Pedro New Exchequer Oroville Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon River Basin Stream San Joaquin Big Dry Creek San Joaquin Mokelumne River Tuolumne Cherry Creek Alameda Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Colorado Arroyo Del Valle Eaton Wash Yuba River Tuolumne River Merced River Feather River Tahchevah Creek Pinon Canyon Arroyo Community in Vicinity Fresno Clements Sonora' Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP 1948 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 16,250 1963 431,500 1956 268,000 1968 1937 1968 1970 1966 1964 1965 1954 77,000 960 960,000 2,030,000 1,026,000 3,539,000 960 4,350 Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) NPP NPP 475 200 NPP 1,910 3,520 1,900 5,838 NPP NPP Project Functions Heigh Type t (Feet) F Earth FRS Earth & Rock FS Earth & Rock FRS Earth F FIRPW FISP FIR FIRSW F Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Rock Earth Earth Length (Feet) 40 20,038 171 2,450 315 223 82 645 565 2,500 880 1,795 2,323 1,920 480 1,200 770 6,850 42 3,610 FW Earth CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Housatonic East Branch, Naugatuck River Housatonic Hall Meadow Brook Torrington Torrington 1964 1962 4,350 8,620 NPP NPP FR Earth F Earth & Rock A-26 - -- -- -- -- APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers But Operated by Others September 30, 2000 Heigh Type t (Feet) Mad River Sucker Brook HAWAII Kaneohe-Kailua Connecticut Connecticut Kaneohe Mad River Sucker Brook Kaneohe Stream Winchester Winchester Kaneohe 1963 1970 1981 9,700 1,480 3,800 10 NPP 26 FR F Earth Earth FR Earth IDAHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW MEXICO Cuchillo Negro NEW YORK Onondaga Upper Snake Potomac Upper Mississippi Rio Grande Oswego Willow Creek Savage Idaho Falls Westernport Bear Creek Hannibal Cuchillo Creek Onondaga Creek Truth or Consequence Syracuse 1975 100,500 1952 1962 1991 1949 20,000 8,700 13,500 18,200 364 360 NPP NPP NPP FIR Earth FRSW Earth & Rock F Earth F Roller Compacted Concrete F Earth A-27 Name River Basin Stream Community in Vicinity Cal. Year Placed in Useful OP Permanent Pool (Acreage) or No Pool (NPP) Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) Project Functions Length (Feet) r APPENDIX A Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers But Operated by Others September 30, 2000 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Placed in Storage or No I c~ifuil (A rr-t Ft) Pool (NPP) 111 V icinity u _J 1 OP Project Functions Heigh Type t (Feet) OKLAHOMA Altus Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees Lake Hudson TEXAS Lake Kemp Red Arkansas Arkansas Red North Fork of the Red River Grand (Neosho) River Grand (Neosho) River Wichita River Altus Disney Locust Grove Wichita Falls 1948 152,430 6,260 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 1964 444,600 10,9006 1972 502,900 15,590 FIS Concrete FRP Concrete FRP Concrete & Earth FIS Earth 90 1,104 147 6,565 90 4,494 115 8,890 UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville WASHINGTON Wynoochee Beaver Winooski Winooski Winooski Chehalis Big Wash Milford Jail Branch Waterbury North Branch Wynoochee River East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville Montesano 1961 1938 1938 1938 1972 1,200 12,050 64,700 20,300 70,000 NPP NPP 890 570 1,150 F Earth F Earth FRP Earth FR Earth FSARI Concrete & Earth 34 2,814 65 158 115 177 1,460 1,800 1,525 1,700 A-28 Name River Basin Stream Community rt try yr 1- Length (Feet) w ks ,.Li c-1= t./ APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation Completion Nature of Project Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD (Sec 205) Aitkin County, CSAH 10, MN Alenaio Streamn, Hawaii, HI Alii Drive, Hawaii, HI (Sec 14) Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO American River, Common Features, CA American River, Folsom Modification, CA American River, Natomas, CA Aquashicola Creek (Borough of Palmerton) Arecibo River, PR Arkansas River at Riverfront Park, North Little Rock, AR Arizona Flood Warning, AZ (Sec 205) Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME (Sec 205) Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS Ashland Road Bridge, Four Mile Creek, NE (Sec 14) Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, CA B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC Badger Creek near Browning, Glacier County, MT (Sec 14) Batesville Sewage Lagoon Batesville Water Tower, Batesville, AR (Sec 14) Battle Mountain, NV (Sec 205) 1995 1999 1995 1999 1996 1983 2000 2000 2000 1998 2000 1998 1998 1999 1984 1996 1928 1985 1967 1993 1990 1998 1998 1997 2000 1999 1998 (2) 1982 1994 1990 1999 2002 2001 1997 2000 1999 Indefinite 2004 2006 2001 1999 2004 1999 2001 2001 1987 1996 2021 TBD 1999 1994 1990 1999 2001 Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Interior Drainage Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Floodway and Levees FC, Rec, and Public Access Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection B-1 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Started i Project Bayou Des Glaises, LA Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX Beaver Creek at Slough Hollow Road, MO (Sec 14) Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY (Sec 205) Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK Big Sioux River & Skunk Creek, Sioux Falls, SD Big Wood River, Deer Creek, Bridge, ID (Sec 14) Black Warrior River, Northport Levee, AL Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO Brays Bayou (Houston), TX Broad Top Region, PA (Wood-Broad Top-Wells) Brush Creek, Jeanette, PA (Sec 14) Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (Sec 14) Buford Trenton Inigation District, ND Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA Cache La Poudre, CO (Sec 14) Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO Cato Spring, Fayetteville, AR (Sec 205) Cedar Falls, IA (Sec 205) Cedar Point Seawall Bay St. Louis, MO Cedar River, Renton, WA (Sec 205) Chaska, MN Cheat River Basin, WV FWS Chicago Shoreline, IL Placed in Useful Operation 1939 1998 2001 1996 2000 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1939 1998 2000 2001 1997 2006 2001 1999 2005 2013 2000 1998 Indefinite 1998 2009 1995 2001 2002 1996 2000 2000 2001 1998 1998 2005 Nature of Project Interior Drainage Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Emergency Bank Stabilization Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Levee Local Protection Local Protection Water Supply Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-2 ... a 1938 1993 1998 1998 1992 2000 1998 1998 1984 1998 1997 1994 1956 1994 1998 1990 2000 1992 1996 1998 1998 1998 1988 1997 1997 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for !1 -.- ' . m m l oir% Project operation kofllll Lu ll Choctawhatchee/Pea Rivers, Alabama and Florida Choctawhatchee/Pea Rivers, Elba/Geneva Levees, AL Chubb Runn, Franklin, PA (Sec 14) Cibola County Rd 7, Cubero, NM (Sec 14) City Ditch, Brevoort, IN (Sec 205) City of Folsom Willow & Humbug Creeks, CA (Sec 205) Clear Creek, TX Clifton, AZ Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, Clinton, NC (Sec 205) Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (Sec 205) Comite River Diversion, LA Conneaut Lake, PA (Sec 14) Connellsville, PA (Sec 205) Connoquenessing Creek, Marion Twp, PA (Sec 205) Connoquenessing Creek, N. Swickley Twp, PA (Sec 205) Cooper Creek, Cheny Valley, TN (Sec 14) Cooper Creek, WA Corte Madera Creek, CA Coulson Park, CO (Sec 14) County Road 62, Santa Fe, NM (Sec 14) Coyote and Berressa Creeks, CA Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR Crookston, MN Cypress Creek, TX Dade County, FL 1995 1998 1995 2000 1998 1999 1988 1994 1999 1994 1999 1996 1996 1996 1997 2000 1999 1966 2000 1994 1994 1994 2000 2000 1975 1997 2000 1995 1994 1996 1999 1998 2001 2001 Unscheduled 2011 2001 2000 1997 2010 1998 1998 1998 1998 2000 2004 Indefinite 2001 1995 Indefinite 1996 2003 2001 2038 Nature of Project Flood Warning Local Protection Levees Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Interior Drainage Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Stream Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection, channel improvement Local Protection Local Protection, non-structural Shore Protection B-3 mm .. APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project StedUefO iopne rat~oono mmp uleitoonn NNaatturereo foPf rPorjoejcect t Dearbort River near Wolf Creek Lewis & Clark County, MT (Sec 14) Delaware River, Water Intake, Kickapoo Reservation, KS (Sec 14) Delaware River Vicinity of Port Jervis, NY Demonstration Erosion Control, MS Deshee River, Brevoort, IN (Sec 205) Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA Dry Fork of Little Fork, Willard, KY (Sec 205) East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, IA (Sec 14) East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL - Rehabilitation El Paso, TX Elk Creek Lake, OR Emmonak Shoreline Erosion, AK (Sec 14) Escanaba Delta County, MI (Sec 14) Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA Falls Lake, NC Fallon, NV (Sec 205) Flatrock River, Rushville, IN (Sec 205) Fort Wayne and Vicinity, IN Four Rivers Basin, FL Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR Francis Bland Floodway Ditch, AR French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (Sec 14) Gallatin River, (1-90), Gallatin County, MT 1994 1996 1995 1985 1998 1989 1967 2000 1992 1988 1971 1971 1998 1999 1985 1973 1998 1998 1994 1966 1987 1986 1996 1991 1994 1994 1983 1993 1973 1999 1993 1983 1986 1996 1992 Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection (Ice Diversion) Local Protection Interior Drainage Recreation Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection 2001 1996 Indefinite 2001 Indefinite 1996 2001 1994 2002 2002 Indefinite 1999 2001 1993 2000 Unscheduled 2001 2001 1996 2002 2003 1998 1992 ..... m APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for !1, f m ~ ldtn7 _i Project Operation Grank Forks, ND-East Grand Forks, MN Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR Grand River, Chariton County, MO (Sec 14) Gray's Creek, TN (Sec 14) Great Bend,KS Great Miami River, Fairfield, OH (Sec 14) Greenbrier River, WV, Flood Waming System Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS Guadalupe River, CA Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL Gulf of Mexico, Highway 193, Mobile Co., AL Gulfside Seawall, Waveland, MS Halstead,KS Hamilton County Streambank Stabilization, TN Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH (Sec 205) Hatchie River, Alcora & Tippah Co, MS Helena & Vicinity, AR Highway 119, Deny, LA (Sec 14) Highway 218, Grand Chenier, LA (Sec 14) Highway 495, Natchitoches,Parish, LA (Sec 14) Highway 69 at Black River, AR (Sec 14) Hodges Village Dam, MA Holes Creek, OH 1999 1999 1998 1998 1988 1999 1998 1986 1987 1987 1992 1988 2000 2000 1991 1999 1996 1997 1997 1994 1995 1994 1999 1997 1998 2006 20099 2000 1998 1994 2001 1999 1988 1988 1988 2008 1989 2001 2001 1995 2001 1997 1999 2002 1994 1996 1994 1999 2000 2001 Nature of Project Local Protection Water Supply Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection; Complete Bank Stabilization Streambank Protection; Complete Streambank Protection Major Rehabilitation of Reservoir Local Protection B-5 1998 1999 1997 1998 1994 1996 1994 1999 2000 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 6 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation t.ompleion Nature ofProject Homme Lake and Dam, ND Hom Lake Creek, MS Houston, MN (Sec 205) Huntington Sewer Main, WV (Sec 14) Jackson County Hwy 2318, MN Jacksonport, White River, AR Jackson Twp, Butler Co, PA (Sec 205) James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA James River Road (CR213), SD (Sec 14) Jim Chapman Lake, TX Joe Pool Lake, TX Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (Sec 205) Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI Kanawha Ave, So Charleston, WV (Sec 14) Kanawha River, So. Charleston, Sewer Main, WV (Sec 14) Kawainui Marsh, Oahu HI (Sec 205) Kaweah River, CA Keizer, OR (Sec 205) Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA 1996 Lake Ashtabula-Baldhill Dam, ND Lake Pontchartmain, LA Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX Larose to Golden Meadow, LA Las Cruces, NM Lesueur River, CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN 1999 1999 1996 1996 1991 1986 1990 1990 1999 1997 2001 1997 2002 1999 2000 1999 1996 1997 1998 1998 2000 1994 1994 1990 1990 1999 2001 1997 2003 2001 1997 2000 2013 1995 2007 2001 2000 Dam Safety Assurances Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Emergency Streambank Protection Reservoir, channel improvement Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety/Major Rehabilitation Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection B-6 r 1995 1993 1995 1999 1994 1995 1997 1994 1999 1958 1975 1989 1986 1999 2000 1995 1999 2000 1996 1994 1967 1987 1972 2000 1999 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Operation uompietion Nature of Project 1981 Indefinite Local Protection Project Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA Little Calumet River, IN Little Dell Lake, UT Little Missouri River, E. River Road, Medora, ND (Sec 14) Little Puerco River, Gallup, NM (Sec 205) Liverpool, IL (Sec 205) Logan Creek, Pender, NE (Sec 205) Long Branch Lake, MO Long Road, Chehali River, WA (Sec 205) Loosahatchie, Memphis, TN (Sec 14) Los Angeles County Drainage Area (LACDA), CA Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, LA Loves Park, IL Lower Columbia River, Barlow Point Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging and Clearing) Madrid Fire Station, Madrid, MO (Sec 14) Magpie Creek & Don Julio, CA (Sec 205) Magpie Creek City of Sacramento, CA (Sec 205) Mahoning River, Struthers, OH (Sec 205) Mahoning River, Warren, OH (Sec 14) Maple Creek E. Fork, Howells, NE (Sec 205) Marshall, MN 1993 1999 2000 1980 1998 2004 1996 1996 1996 2008 1996 1999 2001 2000 1999 Indefinite 2001 1999 2002 2002 2004 2001 Indefinite 1997 2001 2006 1998 1998 1996 2001 Local Protection Reservoirs Emergency Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Flood Control Local Protection Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-7 1990 1985 1999 2000 1997 1996 1973 2000 1998 1995 1999 1991 2000 1985 1995 1997 1997 1997 1995 1994 1996 m Project Marysville/Yuba City Levee Reconstruction, CA Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (Sec 14) Mayfield Creek, KY (Sec 205) Mazon River Twp Road, IL McCreadys Point Road, MD (Sec 14) Meramec River Basin (Valley Park Levee), MO Merced County Streams, CA Metropolitan Louisville, Pond Creek, KY Metropolitan Region of Cincinnati Duck Creek, OH Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bemalillo to Belen, NM Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, CA Milk River, Malta, MT (Sec 205) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (Sec 205) Mill Creek, OH Mill Creek, WA Mingo Creek, OK Mississippi River Channel Improvements (IA, IL, KY, LA, MI, MO & TN) Mississippi River Levees Missouri National Rec River, NE & SD Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO Missouri River, Richland County Rd 152, MT (Sec 14) Molly Ann's Brook, NJ Mon River, Sewage Treatment Plant, Point Marion, PA 1992 1993 1995 1994 1994 1997 1992 1993 1989 1992 1994 1993 1991 1985 2000 1999 1996 1993 1994 1990 1970 1999 1988 1928 1928 1985 1948 1998 1995 1997 p~l,c1 u - - rLLatur rc x.I e _., -L-x- t 1_ C1 _ 2000 1992 1998 1996 1994 2004 Indefinite 2004 2005 2008 2001 1998 19995 Indefinte 2002 1998 2020 2031 2008 Unscheduled 1999 2000 1999 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Oratin Completion T,,. f. P, t Local rrotection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Channel Improvements Main Line Levees Local Protection Local Protection Emergency Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection B-8 NONE" 1999 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation Completion Nature of Project Mon River, Water St. Point Marion, PA Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA Muddy Creek Cascade, Vaughn, MT (Sec 14) Muddy Creek, Gruney Co, MO Mudline to Pineville, MS Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Dam Safety Assurance) Muscatine Island, IA Muskingham River Lakes, OH Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance) Napa River, CA New Orleans to Venice, LA Nickleplate Road, French Creek, Fairfield, PA Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (Sec 205) Nogales Wash, AZ Nonconnanh Creek, TN & MS North Branch Chicago River North Ellenville, NY North Fork, KY Rivers, Jackson, KY (Sec 205) North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA (Sec 14) Oates Creek, GA Oelwin, Fayette County, IA (Sec 205) O'Hare Reservoir, IL Ohio River, Chester, WV (Sec 14) Ohio River Flood Protection, IN 1998 1986 1992 1997 1984 1986 1995 1976 1982 1999 1969 1998 1996 1994 1990 1970 1995 1997 2000 1990 1993 1990 1994 1999 1990 1999 1985 1995 2000 2000 1993 1999 Tobe determined 1994 1999 1985 2002 2000 1988 Indefinite 2006 2017 2001 2000 Indefinite Indefinite3 Indefinite 1997 2000 2000 1992 1997 2001 1998 2002 Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Modernization of Dam Local Protection Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Flood Waming System Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection B-9 .,. Project 1pera uoniIatu Ps0.r iuject u Ohio River, Moundsville, WV (Sec 14) Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) Ouachita River Levees, LA Pajaro River, CA Panola-Quitman Item C, MS Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE Passaic River Preservation of National Storage Areas, NJ Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (Sec 205) Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS Pelucia Creek, Item 1A, MS Pelucia Creek, Item 2, MS Pelucia Creek, Item 3, MS Pelucia Creek, Item 4, MS Peninsula Drainage District #1, OR (Sec 205) Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO Peny Creek, IA Petaluma River, Petaluma, CA (Sec 205) Pine River Dam, MN Pigeon Creek, Monongahela, PA (Sec 205) Pinopolis Dam, SC (Sec 14) Pool 8, Pilot Drawdown, WI Portage, WI Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR Pt. Leflore, MS Raccoon River, IA 1984 1989 1974 1994 1986 1987 1993 1993 1993 1999 1985 1995 1986 2000 1998 1986 Indefinite7 1989 1993 1995 2004 1995 1987 1987 1993 1994 1994 2000 1985 2003 2003 2001 1999 1995 2001 1999 2007 1986 2000 Streambar PtectL;IIon Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety Local Protection Streambank Protection Ecosystem Restoration Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection B-10 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for tli Completion f,..,...r .. 1996 1984 1990 1987 1984 1972 1997 1993 1985 1987 1990 1990 1993 1997 1977 1995 1997 1995 1998 1995 2000 1997 1975 1985 1994 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Started m Placed in Useful Operation 1995 1965 Project Ramapo River at Oakland, NJ Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections Raritan River Basin, Greenbrook Sub-basin, NJ Ray Roberts Lake, TX Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA Red River Basin Chloride Control (Area X) OK and TX Red River Below Denison Dam Red River of the North Fargo Public Facilities, ND (Sec 14) Rend Lake, IL Reno Flood Warning System, NV (Sec 205) Richmond, VA Rillito River, AZ Rio de LaPlata, PR Rio Puerto Neuvo, PR Roanoke River, Upper Basin, VA Roughan's Point, Revere, MA Running Slough Ditch Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA Sacramento River Flood Control, CA Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, CA Salinas River, San Ardo, CA Salyersville, KY San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX 1987 1993 1970 1995 1999 1990 1997 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2002 Indefinite 2011 1999 1994 Indefinite 1995 2002 1999 2001 1995 Indefinite 2007 2014 2008 2001 1990 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1997 1993 2000 2002 B-11 - Nature of Project Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir Chloride Control Levee & Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Deficiency Correction Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection 1998 1975 1987 1991 1948 2000 1996 1998 1986 1994 1995 1994 1990 1997 1990 1963 1963 1918 1990 1993 1991 1957 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Project San Isidro Rd, Santa Fe, NM (Sec 14) San Luis Rey River, CA San Lorenzo River, CA San Pedrocreek, Pacifica, CA (Sec 205) Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA Santa Paula Creek, CA Santree Dam, SC (Sec 14) Sardis, Monroe Co, OH (Sec 14) Savan Gut, VI (Sec 205) Saylorville Lake, IA Seitz Run, Allegheny Co., PA (Sec 205) Sheyenne River, ND Sicily Island, LA, Levee Sidney, NE (Sec 205) Sims Bayou, TX Skyrocket Creek, Quray, Co (Sec 14) Sodus Point Lighthouse, NY (Sec 14) Souris River Basin, ND Southeast Louisiana Southeast Ottawa, IL (Sec 205) Springbrook Creek, PA Steele Bayou, MS Ste. Genevieve, MO St. Francis Basin Stillwater, MN Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Stated Useful Scheduled for Operation Scompledonn Nature of Project 2000 1988 1999 1998 1990 1973 1995 2000 1987 1965 1998 1990 1983 1993 1990 1998 2000 1985 1997 1998 1989 1966 1995 1938 1996 B-1 2 1995 2000 1989 1977 1994 2000 1990 2001 Indefinite 2003 2003 Indefinite Indefinite 1995 2000 2001 1996 1999 2003 2003 1995 2010 1999 2001 1998 2007 2000 1990 2003 2002 2007 Unscheduled Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Urban Flood Control Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Tributary Levees & Channels Local Protection m APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Started Useful Scheduled for Project Operation ompieuon St. Johns Bayou- New Madrid Floodway, MO Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH (Sec 205) Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14) Ted Rhodes Golf Course, Nashville, TN Tehama, CA (Sec 205) Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee () Teton River near Choteau, Teton County, MT (Sec 14) Texas Flat Road, Kiln, MS Thurman to Hamburg, IA Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS Tongue River, State Park, Ranchester, WY (Sec 14) Town Brook, Quincy, MA Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK Turtle Creek, PA Tygart Lake, WV Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS Upper Jordan River, UT Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205) Upper Yazoo Projects, MS Van Bibber Creek, CO (Sec 205) Village Creek, AL Walnut Canyon, CA (Sec 14) Walnut Creek, CA 1997 1996 1984 1995 1999 1983 1974 1992 2000 1996 1965 1993 1992 1995 1943 1995 1996 1993 1994 1986 1976 1995 1989 1994 1964 2007 2001 1986 1995 Unscheduled 1996 Indefinite) 1993 2001 1997 1997 1994 2001 2005 1993 1997 2001 1995 Unscheduled 1987 2011 2003 1996 1998 1997 Nature of Project Rural Urban Flood Control Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection; Complete Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Rehabilitation of Levee System Local Protection Dam Safety Assurance Channel Improvement Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-13 ww 1997 1986 1995 1987 1993 1990 1994 1945 1995 APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Project Westbank and Vicinity, New Orleans, LA West Columbus, OH West Creek, Topeka (Sec 14) West DesMoines-DesMoines, IA West Fork, Grand River, Rte H (Sec 14) West Fork, Grand River, Rte W (Sec 14) West Ray, Marshall, PA (Sec 14) West Tennessee Tributaries Westwego to Harvey, LA Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205) White River, Indianapolis Central, Waterfront, IN White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 205) White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205) Whiteman's Creek, AR Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA Willapa River, Raymond, WA (Sec 14) Wood River, NE Wyoming Valley Levee Raising Yalobusha River Mile 7.5, MS Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (Sec 14) Yonkers (Nepera Park), NY Fiscal Year Placed in Started Useful Operation 1991 1993 1997 1994 1997 1998 1990 1960 1991 1983 1995 1005 1996 1994 1980 2000 1996 1996 1993 1992 1994 2000 1990 1994 1996 1996 1999 2000 1993 1993 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2014 2003 2000 2000 2000 2000 1990 Indefinite' 2011 1984 2002 1999 1998 1999 1996 2000 2003 2002 1993 1993 1995 Nature of Project Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Drainage and Flood Control Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection B-14 . . Fiscal YePalar ced in Started OUpesreaftuioln APPENDIX B Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Construction of further channel improvement was halted in 1987 due to the denial of water quality certification. 2 Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primarily of improvements to existing channels, levees, pumping stations and other flood control structures. 3 Environmental and Recreational separable elements unprogrammed. 4 Levee enlargement remains to be accomplished for 0.8 miles. Awaiting financial completion. Requires a correction in the financial management system. 6 Completion of project depended upon the receipt of adequate funding. Landscaping remains to be accomplished. 8 Recreation contract award is unscheduled. 9 This completion schedule is for the Grand Prairie Region separable element only. B-15 APPENDIX B Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Project Atlantic Coast of Maryland Brevard County, FL Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet (Absecon Island, NJ) Broward County, FL Delaware Coast Protection, DE Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp, NJ Carlsbab Seawall, CA (Sec 103) Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC - Area South Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC - Carolina Beach Portion Casino Beach, IL Castle Pinckney, SC Dade County, FL Delaware Coast from Cape Henlopen to Fedwick Island, DE (Dewey/Rehoboth Beach, DE) Duval County, FL East Rockaway to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY Emeryville, Alameda, CA (Sec 103) Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ Hunting Island, SC Lummi Shore Road, WA (Sec 103) Martin County, FL Myrtle Beach, SC Panama City Beaches, FL Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Useful Completed or Year Operation Scheduled for ina Completion Started 1990 1994 2043 2000 2000 1965 1989 1990 1996 1996 1965 1995 1999 1975 2000 1976 1979 1993 1988 1963 1991 1999 1998 1994 1995 1997 1990 1991 1997 1998 1982 1993 1992 1999 1999 2003 TBD 2011 2028 2042 1997 2047 2014 Indefinite 2000 2038 TBD 2028 2006 1993 2039 2027 2043 1999 1999 2046 2047 2000 B- 16 i APPENDIX B Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Project Pinellas County, FL (Long Key) Presque Isle Peninsula, PA (Permanent) Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, Sec I Sarasota County, FL Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, SC Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC Tybee Island, GA Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) Virginia Beach, VA Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (Sec 103) Wrightsville Beach, NC Fiscal Year Started 1969 1990 1994 1994 1994 1999 1999 1975 1962 1996 1993 1965 Placed in Useful Operation 1993 1995 Incremental 1999 1999 1976 1962 1994 1966 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2043 2042' 2049 2049 2047 1999 2000 2024 2012' 2051 20004 Indefinite B-17 - -- -- -- APPENDIX B Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Emergency Repairs due to Hurricane Andrew as per FY 92 Dire Emergency Act authorization. Original authorized project completed in 1991. 2 IAW Section 355 of WRDA 1996, the project will be extended until the earlier part of year 2012 or completion of the beach erosion control and hurricane Protection project at Virginia Beach, Virginia. 3 Fiscal year 1997 was the fifth year of 50 years of nourishment. 4 Periodic beach nourishment. B-18 APPENDIX B Environmental Restoration Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Amazon Creek Wetlands Restoration, OR (Sec 1135) Anacostia River & Tributaries, MD & DC Barataria Bay Marsh Creation, LA (CWPPRA) Battery Island Bird Habitat Preservation, NC (Sec 204) Cape Fear L&D No. 1 Fish Ladder, NC (Sec 1135) Central and Southern, FL Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD Clatskanie River, OR Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR & WA Dead Lake, AL Everglades & South Florida Ecosystem Falls of Ohio, Wetlands & Fishery, IN (Sec 1135) Fern Ridge Lake Marsh Restoration, OR (Sec 1135) Goldsborough Creek, WA (Sec 206) Gunderson Pond Restoration, CA (Sec 1135) Hidden Lake Restoration, NE Howell Evansville Wetland, IN Sec (1135) Kissimmee River, FL Ladd Marsh, OR Lake Seminole Habitat, FL Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Sec 1135) Little Falls Dam, MD (Sec 1135) Lower Snake Fish & Wildlife Comp Miller Comer, SC Milton Freewater, OR 1999 1999 1996 1999 1996 1950 1997 2000 1988 1998 1998 2000 1999 2000 2000 1996 1999 1989 1999 1998 2000 1999 1979 1999 1999 1996 2000 1997 2000 2001 2001 2000 2000 2001 Indefinite 2000 2001 Undetermined 1998 2005 2001 2001 2002 2001 2002 2000 2010 2001 1999 2000 2000 Undetermined 2000 2001 Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration B-19 r APPENDIX B Environmental Restoration Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 a Project Missouri River Bank Stabilization & Navigation Project, NE Monroe Lake Wetland, IN (Sec 1135) Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure, AR (Sec 1135) MRGO Back Dike Marsh Protection, LA (CWPPRA) Murphy's Slough, CA (Sec 1135) Naugatuck River, Torrington, CT (Sec 1135) Nimrod Fisheries Restoration, AR (Sec 1135) North Fork Feather River, Chester, CA (Sec 1135) Numana Dam, CA (Sec 1135) Pine Flat Bypass, CA (Sec 1135) Poplar Island, MD Putah Creek, South Fork, CA Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA (Sec 1135) Salmon River, Challis, ID Simmons Fieldcontrol Structure, AR (Sec 1135) So. WV (Gilbert, WV) Sewage Treatment Plant So. WV (Mercer Co) Water Distribution System South Fork, Putah Creek, CA (Sec 1135) Tucson (Ajo) Detention Basin Wetlands, AZ (Sec 1135) Turning Basin #3, Seattle WA (Sec 1135) Upper Grande Ronde, OR Vic Fazio Yolo Wildlife Area, CA (Sec 1135) Walla Walla River, OR Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Habitat Control, NE Fiscal Year Started 1992 1999 1995 1999 1998 2000 1999 1994 1998 1998 1998 1999 2000 1999 1998 1998 1998 1998 2000 1999 1997 1992 1994 1999 Placed in Useful Operation 1995 1999 1999 2000 1999 1995 1999 -ddmw B-20 --- Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2000 2000 1999 1999 2001 2000 1999 2000 1999 Unscheduled 2022 Unscheduled 2001 2003 1999 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 2002 1999 2001 2004 Nature of Project Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Fish Habitat Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration Environmental Restoration APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chann Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dept AIWW Between Norfolk, VA & St. Johns River, FL Deep Creek 10.6 Chesapeake, VA 52 300 12 12 12 Miter 1940 22.0 Great Bridge 11.5 Chesapeake, VA 75 540 3 16 16 Miter 1932 6.0 South Mills 33.2 South Mills, NC 52 300 12 12 12 Miter 1941 22.0 Alabama-Coosa Rivers Claiborne 117.5 Claiborne, AL 84 600 30 16 13 Moveable 1603.0 1969 61.0 Millers Ferry 178.0 Camden, AL 84 600 45 16 13 Moveable 9900.0 1969 103.0 Robert F. Henry 281.2 Benton, AL 84 600 45 16 13 Moveable 1496.0 1972 88.0 Allegheny 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11 11 12 Miter 1393.0 1934 8.0 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 14 12 11 Miter 1436.0 1934 10.0 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 11 9 10 Miter 876.0 1927 6.0 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 12 10 11 Miter 780.0 1927 6.0 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12 11 11 Miter 1140.0 1928 9.0 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13 11 10 Miter 916.0 1930 7.0 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 18 14 10 Miter 984.0 1931 10.0 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22 11 11 Miter 950.0 1938 10.0 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, And Flint Rivers George W. Andrews 46.7 Columbia, GA 82 450 25 19 13 Moveable 620.0 1962 29.0 Walter F. George 75.1 Fort Gaines, GA 82 450 88 18 13 Moveable 1337.0 1963 85.0 Jim Woodruff 106.3 Chattahoochee, FL 82 450 33 14 14 Moveable 5924.0 1954 47.0 Bayou Teche, LA Keystone 72.0 New Iberia, LA 36 160 8 9 8 Miter 175.0 1913 35.0 Bayou Teche, LA (FCMR&T) Berwick 1.5 Berwick, LA 45 300 14 9 9 Sector 1950 125.0 East & West Calumet 4.0 Berwick, LA 45 90 0 0 0 Sector 1950 80.0 Charenton 35.7 Charenton, LA 45 0 0 0 0 Sector 1949 80.0 Black Rock Channel & Tonawanda Harbor Black Rock 4.0 Buffalo, NY 70 625 5 22 22 Replaced 1914 6.0 2 el th Width 50 50 12 200 6 50 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 100 9 100 6 100 6 80 8 80 8 80 8 80 1 200 C-1 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chan Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length De Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville 116.6 Coffeeville, AL 110 600 34 13 13 Moveable 1185.0 1960 97.0 Demopolis 213.2 Demopolis, AL 110 600 40 13 13 Moveable 1485.0 1954 48.0 Armistead I. Seldon 262.0 Eutaw, AL 110 600 22 13 13 Moveable 1832.0 1957 77.0 William Bacon Oliver 337.6 Tuscaloosa, WA 110 600 28 18 18 Moveable 800.0 1991 43.0 Holt 347.0 Holt, AL 110 600 64 19 13 Moveable 1138.0 1966 18.0 John Hollis Bankhead 366.0 Adger, AL 110 600 68 13 13 Moveable 1170.0 1975 43.0 Calcasieu River And Pass, LA Calcasieu Barrier 38.9 West Lake, LA 56 575 0 0 0 Sector 450 1968 15.0 Canaveral Harbor Canaveral 3.0 Cape Canaveral, FL 90 600 3 13 13 Sector 0.0 1965 6.0 Cape Fear River 1 39.0 Kings Bluff, NC 40 200 11 9 9 Miter 275.0 1915 32.0 2 71.0 Browns Landing, NC 40 200 9 12 12 Miter 229.0 1917 24.0 William O. Huske 95.0 Tolars Landing, NC 40 300 9 9 9 Miter 220.0 1935 20.0 Chicago Harbor Chicago 327.2 Chicago, IL 80 600 4 27 23 Sector 2100 1939 1.0 Colorado River Colorado River East 441.1 Matagorda, TX 125 1180 12 15 15 Sector 520 1944 3,700.0 Colorado River West 441.8 Matagorda, TX 125 1180 12 15 15 Replaced 520 1944 3,700.0 Columbia River Bonneville 145.3 Cascade Locks, OR 86 650 65 19 24 Miter 2680.0 1993 1,080.0 The Dalles 191.7 The Dalles, OR 86 650 88 15 15 Vertical 8735.0 1957 1,000.0 John Day 216.5 Rufus, OR 86 650 110 15 15 Vertical 5900.0 1968 1,600.0 Nary 292.0 Plymouth, WA 86 650 83 15 20 Miter 7365.0 1953 64.0 nel pth Width 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 13 56 12 100 8 100 8 100 8 100 21 470 12 125 12 125 14 300 14 250 14 250 14 250 C-2 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chann Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dep Cumberland River, TN & KY Barkley 30.6 Grand Rivers, KY 110 800 57 24 13 Miter 9959.0 1964 118.0 Cheatham 148.7 Ashland City, TN 110 798 26 14 12 Miter 801.0 1952 68.0 Old Hickory 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 84 397 60 14 13 Miter 3605.0 1954 97.0 Cordell Hull 313.5 Carthage, TN 84 400 59 14 13 Miter 1138.0 1973 72.0 Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou 1.2 Intracoastal Cit, LA 84 590 4 16 16 Sector 401.0 1968 250.0 GIWW Between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border Algiers 0.0 Algiers, LA 75 760 18 13 13 Sector 1956 384.0 Harvey 0.0 Harvey, LA 75 415 20 12 12 Miter 1935 384.0 Inner Harbor Nvg Chnl 5.6 New Orleans, LA 75 626 17 31 31 Miter 1923 384.0 Bayou Sorrel 37.5 Plaquemine, LA 56 790 21 14 14 Sector 1952 64.0 1 Port Allen 64.1 Port Allen, LA 84 1188 45 13 14 Miter 1961 64.0 1 Bayou Boeuf 93.3 Morgan City, LA 75 1148 11 13 13 Sector 0.0 1954 384.0 Leland Bowman 162.7 Abbeville, LA 110 1190 5 11 11 Sector 1985 384.0 Calcasieu 238.5 Lake Charles, LA 75 1194 4 13 13 Sector 0.0 1950 384.0 Brazos East 400.4 Freeport, TX 75 260 0 15 15 Sector 520 1943 3,700.0 1 Brazos West 400.9 Freeport, TX 75 260 0 15 15 Sector 520 1943 3,700.0 1 Green And Barren Rivers,KY 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84 600 8 12 15 Miter 482.0 1956 54.0 2 63.1 Calhoun, KY 84 600 14 12 12 Miter 519.0 1956 45.0 Hudson River Troy 153.8 Troy, NY 45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 1.0 1916 2.0 1 el th Width 9 300 9 200 9 150 9 150 12 120 16 150 12 120 12 150 12 120 12 120 16 150 16 200 16 200 12 125 12 125 9 150 9 150 4 200 C-3 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chann Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dep Illinois Waterway Lagrange 80.2 Beardstown, IL 110 600 10 16 13 Miter 1066 1939 78.0 Peoria 157.7 Creve Coeur, IL 110 600 11 15 12 Miter 3446 1938 73.0 Starved Rock 231.0 Uitca,IL 110 600 19 17 14 Miter 1280 1933 14.0 Marseilles 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24 19 14 Miter 778.5 1933 27.0 Dresden Island 271.5 Morris, IL 110 600 22 17 12 Miter 1615.5 1933 15.0 Brandon Road 286.0 Joliet,IL 110 600 34 18 14 Miter 2373 1933 5.0 Lockport 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 40 20 15 Miter 500 1933 35.0 Thomas J. O'Brien 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1000 4 18 18 Sector 256.75 1960 7.0 Kanawha Lock & Dam, Washington Winfield 31.1 Winfield,WV 110 800 28 18 18 Miter 700.0 1997 37.0 31.1 Winfield, WV 56 360 28 18 12 Miter 700.0 1937 37.0 31.1 Winfield, WV 56 360 28 18 12 Miter 700.0 1937 37.0 Marmet 67.7 Marmet, WV 56 360 24 18 12 Miter 557.0 1934 16.0 67.7 Marmet, WV 56 360 24 18 12 Miter 557.0 1934 16.0 London 82.8 London, WV 56 360 24 18 12 Miter 557.0 1934 8.0 82.8 London, WV 56 360 24 18 12 Miter 557.0 1933 8.0 Kaskaskia River Kaskaskia 0.8 Modoc, IL 84 600 29 19 11 Miter 120.0 1973 35.0 el th Width 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 160 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 150 9 150 9 150 9 150 9 225 C-4 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chann Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dept Kentucky River, KY 1 4.0 Carrollton, KY 38 145 8 8 15 Miter 424.0 1839 27.0 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38 145 14 8 6 Fixed 400.0 1839 11.0 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38 145 13 9 6 Miter 465.0 1844 23.0 4 65.0 Frankfort, KY 38 145 13 6 7 Fixed 534.0 1844 17.0 5 82.2 Tyrone, KY 38 145 15 10 6 Fixed 556.0 1844 14.0 6 96.2 High Bridge, KY 52 147 14 9 6 Fixed 413.0 1891 21.0 7 117.0 High Bridge, KY 52 147 15 9 7 Fixed 350.0 1897 23.0 8 139.9 Camp Nelson, KY 52 146 19 11 6 Fixed 257.0 1900 18.0 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52 148 17 11 7 Fixed 362.0 1907 19.0 10 176.4 Ford, KY 52 148 17 9 6 Fixed 472.0 1907 25.0 11 201.0 Irvine, KY 52 148 18 10 6 Fixed 208.0 1906 20.0 12 220.9 Ravenna, KY 52 148 17 10 6 Fixed 240.0 1973 19.0 13 239.9 Willow, KY 52 148 18 10 6 Fixed 248.0 1915 9.0 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52 148 17 9 6 Fixed 248.0 1917 26.0 Lake Washington Ship Canal Hiram M. Chittenden 1.3 Seattle, WA 28 123 26 16 16 Miter 235.0 1916 0.0 3 1.3 Seattle, WA 80 760 26 36 29 Miter 235.0 1916 8.0 3 el th Width 6 150 6 150 6 150 6 150 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 6 100 10 0 10 100 C-5 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chann Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dept McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System Norrell 10.3 Arkansas Post, AR 110 600 30 16 15 Fixed 277.0 1967 3.0 2 13.3 ArkansasPost,AR 110 600 20 18 14 Tainter 6300.0 1967 37.0 Joe Hardin 50.2 Grady, AR 110 600 20 18 14 Tainter 2240.0 1968 16.0 Emmett Sanders 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR 110 600 14 18 14 Tainter 5.0 1968 20.0 5 86.3 Redfield, AR 110 600 17 18 14 Tainter 7455.0 1968 22.0 David D. Terry 108.1 Little Rock, AR 110 600 18 18 14 Tainter 4040.0 1968 17.0 Murray 125.4 Little Rock, AR 110 600 18 18 14 Tainter 3530.0 1969 31.0 Toad Suck Ferry 155.9 Conway, AR 110 600 16 18 14 Tainter 1200.0 1969 21.0 Arthur V. Ormond 176.9 Morrilton, AR 110 600 19 18 14 Tainter 1797.0 969 29.0 Dardanelle 205.5 Russellville, AR 110 600 55 18 14 Tainter 1210.0 1969 51.0 Ozark - Jeta Taylor 256.8 Ozark, AR 110 600 34 18 15 Tainter 900.0 1969 36.0 James W. Trimble 292.8 Fort Smith, AR 110 600 20 18 14 Tainter 4260.0 1969 27.0 W.D. Mayo 319.6 Spiro,OK 110 600 21 14 14 Moveable 7400.0 1970 17.0 Robert S. Kerr 336.2 Salisaw, OK 110 600 48 16 14 Moveable 7230.0 1970 30.0 Webbers Falls 366.6 Webber Falls, OK 110 600 30 16 14 Moveable 4370.0 1970 35.0 Chouteau 401.4 Muskogee, OK 110 600 21 15 14 Moveable 11690. 1970 20.0 Newt Graham Lock 421.6 Inola, OK 110 600 21 15 14 Moveable 1630.0 1970 23.0 Mermentau River, LA Schooner Bayou 3.4 Abbeville, LA 75 525 0 0 0 Sector 1950 11.0 Catfish Point 25.0 Creole, LA 56 500 0 0 0 Sector 1951 5.0 el th Width 9 300 9 300 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 250 9 150 9 150 6 60 15 200 C APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Width Mississippi R Betwn Missouri R & Minneapolis, MN Melvin Price 200.8 East Alton, IL 200.8 East Alton, IL 25 241.4 Winfield, MO 24 273.4 Clarksville, MO 22 301.2 Saverton, MO 21 324.9 Quincy, IL 20 343.2 Canton, MO 19 364.2 Keokuk, IA 18 410.5 Gladstone, IL 17 437.1 New Boston, IL 16 457.2 Muscatine, IL 15 482.9 Rock Island, IL 482.9 Rock Island, IL 14 493.0 Leclaire, IA 493.0 Leclaire, IA 13 523.0 Clinton, IL 12 556.0 Bellevue, IA 11 583.0 Dubuque, IA 10 615.0 Guttenburg, IA 9 647.0 Lynxville, WI 8 679.0 Genoa, WI 7 702.0 Dresbach, MN 6 714.0 Trempealeau, WI 5A 728.5 Winona,Mn, MN 5 738.1 Minneiska, MN 4 752.8 Alma, WI 3 796.9 Red Wing, MN 2 815.0 Hastings, MN 1 847.6 Minn. St. Paul, MN 847.6 Minn. St. Paul, MN Lower Saint Anthony Falls 853.3 Minneapolis, MN Upper Saint Anthony Falls 853.9 Minneapolis, MN 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 80 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 56 56 56 1200 24 600 24 600 15 600 15 600 10 600 10 600 10 1200 38 600 10 600 8 600 9 360 16 600 16 600 11 320 11 600 11 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 6 600 5 600 9 600 7 600 8 500 12 400 38 400 38 400 25 400 49 23 42 19 19 18 17 15 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 17 18 18 17 17 22 13 13 14 16 18 Vertical 18 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 14 Miter 12 Moveable 12 Moveable 13 Fixed 14 Moveable 13 Moveable 12 Moveable 11 Moveable 11 Moveable 11 Moveable 14 Moveable 13 Moveable 13 Moveable 13 Moveable 12 Miter 13 Miter 14 Miter 12 Miter 13 Miter 13 Miter 12 Miter 13 Miter 14 Miter 13 Miter 10 Miter 8 Miter 10 Miter 14 Miter 990.0 1990 990.0 1994 1140.0 1939 1200.0 1940 3084.0 1938 2955.0 1938 2144.0 1936 8809.0 1957 6960 1937 3196 1939 3555.0 1937 1203.0 1934 1203.0 1934 2703.0 1939 2703.0 1922 14075 1938 8369 1938 4784 1937 763.0 1936 811.0 1938 935.0 1937 940.0 1937 893.0 1936 682.0 1936 1.0 1935 1.0 1935 365.0 1938 822.0 1930 574.0 1932 574.0 1930 188.0 1959 3.0 1963 C-7 River/ Lock 40.0 40.0 32.0 27.0 24.0 18.0 21.0 46.0 27.0 20.0 26.0 0.0 10.0 29.0 29.0 34.0 26.0 32.0 33.0 31.0 23.0 12.0 14.0 10.0 15.0 44.0 18.0 32.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 4.0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 200 100 ---~ I ~- APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channe Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dept Mississippi R Betwn Ohio And Missouri Rivers 27 185.5 Granite City, IL 110 600 21 15 15 Miter 3000.0 1953 15.0 185.5 Granite City, lL 110 1200 21 15 15 Vertical 3000.0 1953 15.0 Monongahela River 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 360 9 15 16 Miter 748.0 1905 13.0 11.2 Braddock,PA 110 720 9 15 16 Miter 748.0 1905 13.0 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56 720 8 11 11 Miter 670.0 1907 18.0 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56 360 8 11 11 Miter 670.0 1907 18.0 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 56 720 17 20 10 Miter 535.0 1932 20.0 41.5 Monessen, PA 56 360 17 20 10 Miter 535.0 1932 20.0 Maxwell 61.2 Maxwell, PA 84 720 20 20 14 Miter 460.0 1963 24.0 61.2 Maxwell, PA 84 720 20 20 14 Miter 460.0 1963 24.0 Grays Landing 82.0 Grays Landing, PA 84 720 15 27 18 Miter 576.0 1993 21.0 Pt. Marion 90.8 Point Marion, PA 84 720 19 16 35 Miter 682.0 1994 11.0 Morgantown 102.0 Morgantown, WV 84 600 17 17 14 Miter 410.0 1950 6.0 Hildebrand 108.0 Morgantown, WV 84 600 21 14 15 Miter 530.0 1959 7.0 Opekiska 115.4 Opekiska, WV 84 600 22 18 14 Miter 366.0 1964 7.0 el h Width 9 350 9 350 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 c-a APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channel Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Depth Ohio River Emsworth Dashields Montgomery New Cumberland Pike Island Hannibal Willow Island Belleville Racine Robert C. Byrd Greenup Captain Anthony Meldahl Markland Mcalpine Cannelton Newburgh John T. Myers Smithland 6.2 Emsworth, PA 6.2 Emsworth, PA 13.3 Glenwillard, PA 13.3 Glenwillard, PA 31.7 Monaca, PA 31.7 Monaca, PA 54.4 Stratton, OH 54.4 Stratton, OH 84.2 Warwood, WV 84.2 Warwood, WV 126.4 Hannibal, OH 126.4 Hannibal, OH 161.7 Newport, OH 161.7 Newport, OH 203.9 Reedsville, OH 203.9 Reedsville, OH 237.5 Letart, WV 237.5 Letart, WV 279.2 Hogsett, WV 279.2 Hogsett, WV 341.0 Greenup, KY 341.0 Greenup, KY 436.2 Chilo, OH 436.2 Chilo, OH 531.5 Markldand, KY 531.5 Warsaw, KY 606.8 Louisville, KY 606.8 Louisville, KY 720.7 Cannelton, IN 720.7 Cannelton, IN 776.1 Newburgh, IN 776.1 Newburgh, IN 846.0 Mount Vernon, IN 846.0 Mount Vernon, IN 918.5 Hamletsburg, IL 918.5 Hamletsburg, IL 56 360 18 110 600 18 110 600 10 56 360 10 110 600 18 56 360 18 110 1200 21 110 600 21 110 1200 18 110 600 18 110 600 21 110 1200 21 110 600 20 110 1200 20 110 600 22 110 1200 22 110 600 22 110 1200 22 110 1200 23 110 600 23 110 1200 30 110 600 30 110 1200 30 110 600 30 110 600 35 110 1200 35 110 600 37 110 1200 37 110 1200 25 110 600 25 110 1200 16 110 600 16 110 600 18 110 1200 18 110 1200 22 110 1200 22 16 17 13 13 16 16 17 17 17 17 38 38 35 35 37 37 37 37 41 41 45 45 45 45 50 50 19 49 40 40 31 31 34 34 34 34 13 Miter 13 Miter 18 Miter 18 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 18 Miter 18 Miter 17 Miter 17 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 18 Miter 18 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 11 Miter 12 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 15 Miter 16 Miter 16 Miter 12 Miter 12 Miter 1717.0 1921 1717.0 1921 1585.0 1929 1585.0 1929 1379.0 1936 1379.0 1936 1315.0 1959 1315.0 1959 1315.0 1965 1315.0 1965 1098.0 1973 1098.0 1973 1128.0 1972 1128.0 1972 1206.0 1969 1206.0 1969 1173.0 1969 1173.0 1969 1132.0 1993 1132.0 1993 1287.0 1959 1287.0 1959 1756.0 1962 1756.0 1962 1395.0 1959 1395.0 1959 8725 1961 8725 1961 2054.0 1971 2054.0 1971 2275.6 1975 2275.6 1975 3504.0 1975 3504.0 1975 2962.0 1980 2962.0 1980 C-9 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 23.0 30.0 30.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 36.0 36.0 34.0 34.0 42.0 42.0 62.0 62.0 95.0 95.0 75.0 95.0 75.0 75.0 114.0 114.0 55.0 55.0 70.0 70.0 73.0 73.0 Width 99 99999999999 9999999999 9999999999 999 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 - 300 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chann Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dept 52 938.9 Brookport, IL 110 600 12 15 11 Miter 2978.0 1928 20.0 938.9 Brookport, IL 110 1200 12 15 11 Miter 2998.0 1969 20.0 53 962.6 Mound City, IL 110 1200 12 15 10 Miter 3560.0 1980 24.0 962.6 Mound City, IL 110 600 12 15 10 Miter 3560.0 1929 24.0 Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie 15.3 Stuart, FL 50 225 13 14 12 Sector 170.0 1941 15.0 Port Mayaca 38.5 PortMayaca, FL 56 400 2 14 14 Sector 116.0 1977 5.0 Moore Haven 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 50 250 2 10 11 Sector 89.8 1953 16.0 Ortona 93.6 Labelle,FL 50 225 11 12 11 Sector 104.0 1937 16.0 W. P. Franklin 122.0 Fort Myers, FL 56 400 3 13 13 Sector 1150.0 1965 8.0 Old River, LA (MR&T) Old River 304.0 Simmesport, LA 75 1190 35 11 11 Miter 1100 193 7.0 Ouachita And Black Rivers Below Camden, AR Jonesville 25.0 Jonesville, LA 84 600 30 18 15 Moveable 450.0 1972 92.0 Columbia 117.2 Columbia, LA 84 600 18 18 18 Moveable 400.0 1972 109.0 Felsenthal 226.8 Felsenthal, LA 84 600 18 18 13 Moveable 350.0 1984 55.0 H. K. Thatcher 281.7 Calion, LA 84 600 12 18 13 Moveable 350.0 1984 50.0 Pearl River Lateral Canal 1 29.7 Pearl River, LA 65 274 27 10 10 Moveable 0.0 1949 11.0 2 40.8 Bush, LA 65 274 15 10 10 Moveable 1950 3.0 3 43.9 Sun, LA 65 274 11 10 10 Moveable 1950 5.0 Red River Ww-Mississippi R To Shreveport, LA Lindy Claiborne Boggs 44.0 Larto, LA 84 685 36 22 13 Moveable 630.0 1984 30.0 John H.Overton 74.0 Ruby, LA 84 685 24 23 23 Moveable 348.0 1987 42.0 3 116.4 Colfax, LA 84 685 31 25 18 Moveable 1992 40.0 4 169.0 Coushatta, LA 84 685 25 25 18 Miter 690.0 1994 31.0 Joe D. Waggonner 200.0 Caspiana, LA 84 685 25 22 23 Miter 663.0 1994 28.0 Savannah River New Savannah Bluff 187.2 Augusta, SC 56 360 15 14 12 Miter 360.0 1937 16.0 C.-1o el :h Width 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 8 80 8 100 8 90 8 90 8 90 12 120 9 100 9 100 9 100 7 100 7 80 7 80 7 80 9 200 9 200 9 100 9 200 9 200 9 90 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Channe Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dept Snake River Ice Harbor 9.7 Pasco, WA 86 650 103 14 15 Vertical 2790.0 1962 32.0 1 Lower Monumental 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 86 650 103 19 15 Vertical 3800.0 1969 29.0 1 Little Goose 70.3 Starbuck, WA 86 650 101 20 15 Miter 2655.0 1970 37.0 1 Lower Granite 107.5 Pomeroy, WA 86 650 105 20 15 Miter 3200.0 1975 38.0 1 St. Marys River, MI Davis 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 80 1320 22 24 23 Leaf 1914 0.0 Macarthur 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 80 780 22 31 31 Leaf 1300.0 1943 0.0 2 New Poe 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 110 1200 22 32 32 Leaf 1300.0 1963 0.0 Tennessee River, TN, AL, And KY Pickwick Landing 206.7 Pickwick Dam, Tn, TN 110 600 55 16 17 Fixed 7385.0 1937 53.0 9 Guntersville 349.0 Guntersville, AL 60 360 39 17 18 Tainter 3837.0 1937 76.0 9 Tennessee River, TN, AL, And KY Kentucky 22.4 Grand Rivers, KY 110 600 57 24 13 Miter 7976.0 1942 184.0 9 Melton Hill 23.1 Kingston, TN 75 400 58 13 13 Tainter 1072.0 1963 38.0 9 Pickwick Landing 206.7 Pickwick Dam, Tn, TN 110 1000 55 19 17 Fixed 7385.0 1984 53.0 9 Wilson 259.4 Florence, AL 110 600 94 11 11 Fixed 3728.0 1959 16.0 9 259.4 Florence, AL 60 300 49 13 13 Miter 3728.0 1927 16.0 9 259.4 Florence, AL 60 300 45 11 11 Fixed 3728.0 1927 16.0 9 General Joseph Wheeler 274.9 Rogersville, AL 60 400 48 15 13 Fixed 5738.0 1934 74.0 9 274.9 Rogersville, AL 110 600 48 15 13 Fixed 5738.0 1963 74.0 9 Guntersville 349.0 Guntersville, AL 110 600 39 17 18 Miter 3837.0 1965 76.0 9 Nickajack 424.7 Jasper, TN 110 600 39 13 11 Miter 3763.0 1967 46.0 9 Chickamauga 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 60 360 49 10 14 Miter 5654.0 1937 59.0 9 Watts Bar 529.9 Breendenton, TN 60 360 58 12 12 Tainter 2646.0 1941 720 9 Ft. Loudon 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 60 360 72 12 12 Tainter 3687.0 1943 50.0 9 I h Width 4 250 4 250 4 250 4 250 0 300 7 300 0 300 S 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 C-11 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 2000 River/ River Chamber Depth on Sills Dam Year Chann Lock Mile Community Width Length Lift Upper Lower Type Length Open Length Dep Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway AL, MS Howell Heflin 266.1 Gainesville, AL 110 600 36 15 15 Moveable 1546.0 1978 49.0 Tom Bevill 306.8 Aliceville, AL 110 600 27 15 15 Moveable 1479.0 1979 41.0 John C. Stennis 334.7 Columbus, MS 110 600 27 15 15 Moveable 1004.0 1980 28.0 Aberdeen 357.5 Aberdeen, MS 110 600 27 15 15 Moveable 1064.0 1985 23.0 Amory 371.1 Amory, MS 110 600 30 15 15 Moveable 0.0 1985 14.0 Glover Wilkins 376.3 Smith.Sville, AL 110 600 25 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 15.0 Fulton 391.0 Fulton, MS 110 600 25 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 7.0 John E. Rankin 398.4 Fulton, MS 110 600 30 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 8.0 G.V. "Sonny" Montgomery 406.7 Belmont, MS 110 600 30 18 18 Moveable 0.0 1985 5.0 Jamie Whitten 411.9 Tupelo, MS 110 600 84 18 18 Moveable 1064.0 1985 65.0 Willamette River At Willamette Falls Willamette Falls Locks 26.0 West Linn, OR 40 198 20 6 8 Leaf 0.0 1873 0.0 Williamette Falls Guard Lock 26.4 West Linn, OR 40 198 10 6 8 Leaf 0.0 1873 24.0 el th Width 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 9 300 6 150 6 150 C- 12 APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107) AIWW Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC Aquadilla Harbor, PR (Sec 107) Blair Waterway, Tacoma, WA (Sec 107) Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA Boston Harbor, MA Burns Harbor, IN Chain of Rocks Canal, IL Canaveral Harbor Deepening, FL Canaveral Harbor, FL Cape Cod Canal, MA Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.) Channel to Victoria, TX Charleston Harbor (Deeping/Widening), SC Chicago Harbor (Lock), IL Chicago Harbor (Lock), IL Cook Inlet Navigation Improvement, AK Crescent City Harbor, CA Delaware River Mainstem Channel & Deepening, NJ, PA, & DE Fort Pierce Harbor, FL 1987 1974 1993 1999 1985 1998 1995 1999 1993 1994 2000 1967 1987 1993 1998 1995 1996 1998 1998 1999 1995 1989 1986 ' 1993 2000 1953 1968 1989 1989 2001 1995 2001 2001 2001 1999 2004 1994 2044 2003 Indefinite Indefinite 2002 2003 1997 1997 2001 2000 2006 1996 Dredging and breakwater Replacement of existing bridges Breakwater Deepen Channel and Turning Basin New larger lock Channel deepening Breakwater Rehabilitation Deficiency Correction Navigation Channels Jetty extension and sand tightening Major Rehabilitation of Railroad Bridge Deferred anchorage construction Dredge 50 ft. Channel. Deepen to 55 feet Enlarging and deepening channel to 12 foot depth Deepen Entrance Channel to 47 feet and inner channels to 45 feet depth. Lock Bulkhead Fabrication Construct Slots to Dewater Lock Gate Bays Channel Dredging Deepen Channel Deepen Channel Enlarge entrance channel D-1 APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Project Four Locks, Illinois Waterway, IL Freeport Harbor, TX Grays Harbor, WA Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) Monongahela River, PA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, TX (Sec 216) Gulfport Harbor, MS Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR Hempstead Harbor, NY Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX Humboldt Harbor and Bay Deepening, CA Illinois Waterway Four Locks Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock Jacksonville Harbor, FL Kake Harbor, AK Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI Kentucky Lock Addition, KY Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY (Stage 1) Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY (Stage II) Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI Fiscal Year Started 1993 1987 1990 1986 1998 1991 1989 1992 1998 1997 1993 1999 1999 1997 1996 1998 1986 1999 1988 Placed in Useful Operation 1991 1997 2001 1994 1995 1998 1988 Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1996 1998 2001 2001 2001 (6) 1995 1995 2005 2000 1996 2011 2003 2000 1998 2010 1995 2005 1988 Nature of Project Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation Navigation channel widening and deepening Construct new lock & dam to replace existing lock & dam 7 Bank Protection to protect Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the critical habitat of endangered whooping crane Deepen Channel New Slackwater Harbor Removal of derelect barges Deepen and Widen Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Harbor and Channel Deepening and Widen channel Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Lock Replacement Dredging material disposal facilities Breakwater and Navigation Channel Breakwater Lock Addition (1200 feet) Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening to 40 ft Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening to 45 ft Breakwater 1-2 w Fiscal.Year APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Project Lock and Dams 2, 3 and 4, Monongahela, PA and WV Lock and Dam 3, MN Lock and Dams 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA Lock and Dam 13, IL Lock and Dam 14, IL Lock and Dam 15, IL Lock and Dam 24, MO Lock and Dam 25, MO London Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, WV Los Angeles Harbor, CA McAlpine Lock and Dam McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR Manatee Harbor, FL Marmet Locks & Dam, WV Melvin Price Lock and Dam, IL and MO Miami Harbor Channel, FL Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers IL and MO Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Fiscal Year Started 1992 1998 1989 1993 1996 1993 1996 1994 1999 1996 1996 1963 1995 1998 1974 1993 1910 1987 Placed in Useful Operation Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2008 2004 2004 1938 1939 1934 1940 1939 1970 1990 1987 ' 1997 2001 1997 2007 2001 2003 2001 2008 2000 2002 2009 2005 2002 2014 Indefinite Nature of Project Major rehabilitation of locks and dams, removal of Lock and Dam 3 Major rehabilitation/embankments Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical systems Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Channel Deepening Lock Replacement (1200 feet) Locks and dams Enlarge turning basin, construct wideners, mitigation Construction of new lock Replacement Navigation Channels & Turning Basin Regulating works Dredging 55-foot channel D-3 - -- -- ---- --- I mqmfimmmmmmm .... M, Ill APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Project Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO Montgomery Point Lock and Dam, AR Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal Waterway) Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI Neal Sound, MD Neches River Saltwater Barrier New Madrid County Harbor New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey Channel, NJ New York Harbor, NY and NJ Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA (107) Oakland Harbor, CA Olmsted Locks and Dam, IL & KY Fiscal Year Started 1992 1997 1984 1985 1999 2000 2000 1998 1976 1966 1987 1987 1995 1987 Placed in Useful Operation 1994 1987 2000 2000 Incremental 1967 1989 1989 1995 1992 Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2006 2002 1995 1987 2000 2005 2000 2010 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1996 2000 2011 Nature of Project Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses from construction and operation of Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project Lock and Dam Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation Breakwater repair 1650 ft stone jetty Construction of a tainter-gated saltwater barrier structure, sector-gated navigation bypass channel, access road and levee Slackwater Harbor Expansion Deepening channel to 45 ft. providing a turning basin and bulkheading portions of the turning basin. Removal of drift sources Deferred anchorage const. Dredge 50 ft. channel and deepen to 55 feet Dredge outbound element and deepen to 55 feet 9ft.x 130ft. barge channel Channel deepening and widening turning basin Navigation D-4 r __ FYisecaarl APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Fiscal Year Project Started Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA 1964 Palm Valley Bridge, FL Pascagoula Harbor, MS Point Marion, Lock & Dam 8, Monongahela River, PA Port of Florence, AL Port of Long Beach (Deepening), CA Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Richmond Harbor, CA Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, Ohio River Rudee Inlet, VA Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA Salem River, NJ San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) San Juan Harbor, PR Santa Monica Breakwater, CA Saugus River, Saugus, MA (Sec 107) Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA Savannah Harbor Deepening, GA Savannah Harbor Widening, GA 1998 1994 1986 1994 1998 1974 1985 1985 1990 1986 1995 1971 1998 1998 2000 1993 1993 1990 Placed in Useful Operation 1984 1995 1984 1992 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion Indefinite 2002 2000 1997 1995 2002 Indefinite' 2000 2003 t991 1991 Being Determined 1996 1996 Being Determined 2002 2002 2002 1997 1994 1992 Nature of Project Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment Bridge Replacement Channel dredging and construction of a new turning basin Replaces existing 56x360' lock chamber with new 84'x720' chamber Channel Dredging Channel Deepening Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement and realignment Channel deepening and turning basin Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam Dredge 7 foot channel Deep draft channel, widening and deepening Channel deepening Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging Deepening & widening for channel Repair Breakwater Dredge entrance channel and two anchorages Restoration of Tidal Wetlands on a 348 acre site Channel deepening Widening channel D-5 I - - - - - - ---- -- - -- -- ..... mil mmm APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 Project Seattle Harbor, East Waterway, WA' Shallow Creek Spur Channel, MD Shinnecock Inlet, NY St. George Channel Extension, AK St. Paul Harbor Improvements, AK Taconite Harbor, MN Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) Tampa Harbor (Port Sutton), FL Tampa Harbor (Ybor Channel), FL Taylor Point Cut, LA (107) Tenn River, Port of Florence Wallisville Lake, TX Wilmington Harbor, NC Winfield Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, WV Fiscal Year Started 1999 1999 1990 1994 1999 2000 1976 1991 1999 1999 1994 1967 1999 1990 Placed in Useful Operation 2000 1999 1999 1997 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 2003 2001 1995 1996 2004 2001 1987 2002 2001 1999 1995 2002 2005 2002 Nature of Project Dredge East Waterway to 51 ft. Spur Channel Dredging and repair of jetties Dredging Breakwater Improvements and Dredging Harbor of refuge construction Dredging Deepen Channel Enlarge turning basin Navigation cut from Charenton LK to Grand Isle Channel Improvements Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) Dredging to Deepen Construction of new lock 0-6 ... . m wmlmmpom IFEMM APPENDIX D Navigation Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 2000 ' Walter Jones, Joseph P. Knapp, Core Creek, and Gene A. Potter Memorial Bridge are complete. Fairfield bridge is under construction. 2 Phase I, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation in 1988. Phase II, forty-five foot channel from mile 181 to Baton Rouge placed in useful operation in 1994. Awaiting further PCA's to go deeper than 45 feet. 4 Lock and Dam No. I placed in useful operation in 1984. Lock and Dam No. 2 in 1987. Lock and Dam No. 3 in 1992. Lock and Dam No. 4 and 5 in 1994. Schedule for completion of entire project is indefinite. However, the project opened to 9-foot navigation on 31 December 1994. 6 Thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. O0& M funded. APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 2000 Flood Control Total and/or Nay. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Heigh Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (feet) Albeni Falls, ID Allatoona Lake,GA Barkley Dam & Lake Barkley, KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpel), SD Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita Bonneville L&D Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake, OK Buford Dam, Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake AR & MO Clarence Cannon Dam Carters Dam, GA Center Hill Lake, TN Cleatham L&D, TN Chief Joseph Danm, (Rufus Woods Lake), WA Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC Cordell Hull L&D, TN Cougar Lake, OR Pend Oreille Etowah Cumberland White Missouri Ouachita Columbia Mountain Fork Chattahoochee White Salt Coosawatte Caney Fork Cumberland Columbia Santee Cumberland S.Fork McKenzie Newport,WA Cartersville,GA Frand Rivers, KY Eureka Springs, Chamberlain,S D Mt. Pine, AR Bonneville,OR Broken Bow, OK Buford, GA Mountain Home Perry, MO Carters, GA Lancaster,TN Ashland City, TN Bridgeport, WA St. Stephen, SC Carthage, TN Blue River, OR 1,153,000 670,000 2,082,000 1,952,000 1,883,000 2,768,000 537,000 1,368,230 2,554,000 5,408,000 1,428,000 472,756 2,092,000 104,000 593,000 2,560,000 310,900 219,000 1952 1950 1964 1963 1964 1953 1938 1968 1956 1952 1983 1975 1948 1952 1955 N/A 1973 1963 1955 1950 1966 1965 1965 1956 42,600 74,000 130,000 1.12,000 468,000 75,000 42,600 74,000 130,000 112,000 468,000 75,000 1938 1,145,700 1,145,700 1970 1957 100,000 86,000 NFPR FPRW NPFR FPSR FPRIW FPRW NPR CC CE CE E E 235 1,100 C 122 2,690 100,000 FPWSR E 225 86,000 1953 340,000 340,000 1985 1975 1951 1958 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 1956 2,457,384 2,457,384 1985 1974 1964 84,000 84,000 100,000 100,000 25,000 64,600 NFPW E FPR C FNPRSW CE FPRW ER FPR CE NPR C PIR C NPW CE NPR CE NFPRI ER 86 876 E-1 t Length (feet) 90 190 157 228 95 1,055 1,250 9,959 2,575 10,570 192 258 138 450 250 75 230 2,750 5,400 2,256 1,700 1,950 2,160 801 5,998 93 445 1,306 1,738 i APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 2000 Flood Control Total and/or Nav. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Heigh Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (feet it Length ) (feet) Dale Hollow Lake, TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, AR DeGray Lake, AR Denison Damn (Lake Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, including Big Cliff Lake, OR Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID Eufaula Lake, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Fort Peck Lake, MT Fort Randal Darn Lake Francis (Case), SD Garrison Dan ( Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavins Point Dam (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green Peter Lake,OR, including Foster Lake, OR Greers Ferry Lake, AR Harry S. Truman Damn & Res. Ilartwell Dan & Lake, GA & SC H ills Creek Lake, OR Obey Arkansas Caddo Red North Santiamn N. Fork, Clearwater Canadian Grand (Neosho) Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Middle Santiam Little Red Osage Savannah Middle Fork W ilanette Celina, TN Dardanelle, AR Arkadelphia, AR Denison, TX Mill City, OR Orofino, ID Eufaula, OK Ft. Gibson, OK Glasglow, MT Lake Andes, SD Riverdale, ND Yankton, SD Sweet Home, OR Heber Spings Warsaw, MO Hartwell, GA Oakridge, OR 1,706,000 486,200 831,900 5,194,163 461,000 3,468,000 3,825,400 1,284,400 18,909,000 5,574,000 24,137,000 504,000 491,000 2,844,000 5,202,000 2,842,700 356,000 1943 1969 1969 1944 1953 1972 1964 1949 1938 1953 1954 1956 1967 1962 19793 1961 1961 1949 1965 1972 1945 1954 1973 1964 1953 1944 1954 1956 1957 54,000 124,000 68,000 70,000 118,000 400,000 90,000 45,000 185,250 320,000 430,000 100,000 1967 100,000 1964 1982 1962 1962 96,000 160,000 422,000 30,000 E-2 C C E E C CG EE EE E E 200 68 243 165 382 717 114 110 251 165 210 74 54,000 124,000 108,000 199,000 118,000 1,060,000 7 90,000 67,500 185,250 320,000 430,000 100,000 100,000 96,000 160,000 422,000 30,000 FPR NPR FNPRS FPRSNW NFPRI PNFR FNPSRWX FPNW NFPRIW NFPRIW NFPRIW NFPRIW PFNIR FPRS FPRWS FPRSW NFPRI 1,717 2,683 3,400 17,200 1,528 3,287 3,200 2,990 21,026 10,700 11,300 8,700 1,380 1,704 5,000 17,880 2,150 C 340 C CE CE GE 243 96 204 304 APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 2000 Flood Control Total and/or Nay. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Installation Project Height Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) (KW) Functions Type2 (feet) Ice Harbor L&D (Lake Snake Pasco, WA 417,000 1961 1961 603,000 603,000 NPRI CG 130 Sacajawea), WA J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Lake GA & SC6 Jim Woodruff Dam (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL John Day L&D (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA John H. Kerr Damn & Reservoir, NC& VA Keystone Lake, OK Lake Greeson, AR Laurel River, KY Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT Little Goose L&D (Lake Bryan), WA Lookout Point Lake including Dexter Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, OR Lower Granite L&D, WA Lower Monumental L&D (Lake Herbert G. West), WA Stones Savannah Appalachicola Columbia Roanoke Arkansas Little Missouri Laurel Kootenai Snake Middle Fork Rogue Snake Snake Nashville, TN Augusta, GA Chattahoochee, FL Rufus, OR Boydton, VA Tulsa, OK Murfreesboro, AR London, KY Libby, MT Starbuck, WA Lowell, OR Trail, OR Pomeroy, WA Kahlotus, WA 652,000 2,900,000 367,300 2,500,000 2,750,300 1,672,613 407,900 435,600 5,809,000 565,200 483,000 465,000 483,800 376,000 1967 1952 1957 1968 1952 1964 1950 1973 1972 1970 1954 1977 1975 1969 1970 1953 1957 1969 1953 1968 1950 1978 1975 1970 1955 1977 1975 1969 28,000 282,000 30,000 2,160,000 204,000 70,000 25,500 61,000 525,000 810,000 135,000 49,000 810,000 810,000 28,000 282,000 30,000 2,700,000 204,000 70,000 25,500 61,000 840,000 810,000 135,000 49,000 810,000 810,000 FPRW FPRSW CE CE 147 200 Length (feet) 2,822 2,716 5,680 NPRW CE 67 6.150 NPRFI FPRW FNPWSR FPRW FPRW FPR NPRI NFPRI DFPISWR NPRIF NPRI CE CE E C R C CG CE CE CG CG 161 144 121 183.5 282 420 165 243 345 146' 135 5,900 22,285 4,600 941 1,420 3,055 2,655 3,381 3,600 3,200 3,791 E-3 an Project McNary L&D OR & WA Millers Ferry L&D, AL Mississippi Delta Region, LA (Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion) Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, FSM New Melones Lake, CA4 Norfork Lake, AR & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Oahe), SD & ND Old Hickory L&D, TN Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Richard B. Russell Dam & Lake, GA & SC Robert F. Henry L&D, AL Robert S. Kerr L&D and Reservoir, OK Sam Rayburn Dam& Reservoir, TX St. Mary's Riv, MI Communit Vicinity Umatilla, O Camden, A] Braithwaite River Columbia Alabama Mississippi Nanpil River Stanislaus North Fork Missouri Cumberland Arkansas Roanoke Savannah Alabama Arkansas Angelina APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 2000 Flood Control Total and/or Nay. Storage Feature Placed Initial Existing U y in Capability in Useful Power in Installation Ins/ y (acre-feet)' Operation CY FY (KW) R 1,350,000 1953 1954 980,000 91 L 331,8090 1969 1979 75,000 7 SLA 1991 2,400,000 1,983,000 23,337,000 545,000 148,400 318,500 1,026,244 234,200 525,700 3,997,600 Great Lakes Sault Ste. Marie 1987 1978 1943 1959 1954 1969 1951 1984 1972 1970 1965 1855 1988 1979 1944 1962 1957 1973 1954 1984 1975 1971 1966 1952 2,000 300,000 80,550 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 300,000 68,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 ltimate tallation (KW) 80,000 5,000 2,000 300,000 163,000 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 600,000 68,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 Project Functions NPRI NPRW W Type- CG CE CE Height Length (feet) (feet) 183 7,365 90 11,380 38.5 371 P C 17 70 FIPRW FPRS NFPRIW NPR NPR FPR PRFSW NPRW NPRW FPWR ER C E CE C CE CE CE E CE NP 625 216 245 98 58 220 200 101 75 120 Control Gate 1,560 2,624 9,300 3,605 2,480 892 5,616 14,962 7,230 19,430 E-4 - _.....,. ..... _ Pohnpei, FSM Oakdale, CA Norfolk, AR Pierre, SD Hendersonville, TN Ozark, AR Bassett, VA Augusta, GA Benton, AL Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX ,7 -- - APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 2000 Project River Snettisham, AK' Speel Stockton Lake, MO Sac Table Rock Lake, AR White & MO Tenkiller Lake, OK Illinois The Dalles L&D (Lake Columbia Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George Chattahoo L&D, GA & FL Webbers Falls L&D, Arkansas OK West Point Lake, AL Chattahoo & GA Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Wolf Creek Dam Cumberla (Lake Cumberland), KY Community in Vicinity Juneau, AK Stockton, MO Branson, MO Gore, OK The Dalles, OR che Fort Gaines, ache GA Wevbbers Falls, OK West Point, GA Whitney, TX nd Jamestown, KY Total Storage Capability (acre-feet)' 352,400 1,674,000 3,462,000 1,230,800 53,000 934,000 170,100 604,500 1,999,500 6,089,000 Flood Control and/or Nav. Feature Placed in Useful Operation CY 1969 1958 1952 1957 1963 1970 1975 1953 1950 Initial Power in FY 1973 1973 1959 Existing Installation (KW) 73,700 45,200 200,000 Ultimate Installation (KW) 73,700 45,200 200,000 1953 39,100 39,100 1957 1,806,800 1,806,800 1963 1973 1975 1954 1952 130,000 60,000 73,375 130,000 60,000 108,375 30,000 30,000 270,000 270,000 Project Height Length Functions Type2 (feet) (feet) P C6 18 338 FPRWSQ CEG 128 5,100 FPR CE 252 6,423 FPSWRN E 197 3,000 NPR CR 300 8,875 NPRW CE 114 13,585 NPRW E 84 4,370 FPRW CE 97 7,250 FPR FPR CE CE 159 258 17,695 5,736 E-5 I m .umm"m .o.mmom .. . .... APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable September 30, 2000 NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS D - Debris Control P - Power F - Flood Control R - Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I - Irrigation S - Water Supply N - Navigation W - Fish & Wildlife (Federal Or State) Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth All six units have successfully generated power; however, repairs and modifications have been required on all units. Units 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 fully repaired and operational. Repairs to remaining unit No. 1 will be completed in FY 99. Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration Formerly Clarks Hill Lake Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized in 1990. E-6 APPENDIX F Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 2000 Nameplate Capacity Project Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled Ultimate Installation Year For For Functions Installation Started Operation Completion Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC 1977 1985 2000 NWDP 84,000 84,000 Garrison Dam & Powerplant, ND (Maj 1997 2005 2005 P/F/N/I 109,950 98,000 Rehab) Mississippi Delta Region, LA (Davis Pond 1996 2000 2003 2003 W Freshwater Diversion) New Melones Lake, CA ' 1966 1979 Indefinite DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 PieiTre, SD 1999 2006 1006 F N/A N/A Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah 1975 1985 2004 FRPW 600,000 600,000 River, GA and SC KEY - Redevelopment - Power F - Flood Control R - Recreation I S - Irrigation - Water Supply N W - Navigation - Fish & Wildlife F-1 D P APPENDIX F Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 2000 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of unscheduled recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. F-2 Appendix G ANNUAL FLOOD DAMAGE REPORT Page Number G-3 G-4 G-5 G-6 G-7 G-8 * FIGURES Figure 1 -- Damages Reduction Figure 2 -- Potential Flood Damages Figure 3 -- Flood Related Lives Lost Figure 4 -- Continental U.S. River Basins (For Use With Table 6) Figure 5 -- Benefits and Accumulated Expenditures Figure 6 - Atlantic Tropical Storms * TABLES Table 1 -- Flood Damages Prevented, By State in Fiscal Year 2000 Table 2 -- Total Damages Suffered, By State in Fiscal Year 2000 Table 3 -- Flood Damages Prevented, Fiscal Years 1991-2000 Table 4 -- Total Damages Suffered By State, Fiscal Years 1991-2000 Table 5 -- Total Lives Lost, By State in Fiscal Years 1991-2000 Table 6 -- Regional Distribution, Flood Damages Prevented Table 7 - Atlantic Ocean Tropical Cyclones and their Effects G-10 G-12 G-14 G-16 G-18 G-20 G-22 FIGURES G-2 Flood Damage Reduction 50. 45. 40. 35. 30. 25- 20. 15. 10- Co Flood Damages Prevented in the U.S.A. by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers G-3 0O0 0 0 o a 8 m Figure 2 Potential Flood Damages N CM) 0) 0) 0) 0) ur 0) 0) o O 0)- Flood Damages Suffered ] Flood Damages Prevented G,4 60. 50- 40. 30. UL) a 0 0 m 10. FigOfe 3 Flood Related Lives Lost (V) U) ) 00 00 00 00 00 0) a) () 0) a) 0) 0) TM r r * Average for the previous 10-years. Fiscal Year G-5 250 200 -q 150 100 50 0 -J I -J Figure 4 CONTINENTAL U.S. RIVER BASINS Missouri ;i er Great Basin I Ohio Lower ,Miss.0 For use with Table 6 G-6 Rio Grande FigiPe 5 Benefits of Federal Projects (Damages Prevented) Accumulative Corps Expenditures (Principle plus O&M) Adjusted to 2000 using Construction Cost Index EM 1110-2-1304 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 L ,- O O m Flood Damage Reduction BENEFITS TO COST $6.08 in Benefits for every $1.00 Invested Accumulative Expenditures Annual Benefits N C t U) o c0 (0 It it 00 0O 00 01 0 0) Q) 0) 01) 0 0) ) 0M 0) CD 0 0) 0 0 M 0) 0) 0) O - - V- - N Fiscal Year G-7 Accumulative Benefits Figure 6 Atlantic Tropical Cyclones 20 c 15 0 U 10. ci *- ILC 0) 0) C 0) 0) a Hurricanes (winds > 74 mph) 0 Tropical Storms (winds > 39 mph) G-8 O L a) E zz3 TABLES G-9 TABLE - 1 FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) During Fiscal Year 2000 Reduction by Reduction by Damages Prevented Total Flood Average *Comparision of Location Corps Supported Corps by Corps Supported Damages Reduction Damage 2000 to the Reservoirs Levees Emergency by the Corps Reduction Ten-Year Avg Operations of Engineers FY 1991-2000 FY 1991-2000 ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 0 Low ALASKA 200 0 0 200 3,580 Low ARIZONA 0 0 0 0 28,502 Low ARKANSAS 25,771 7,958 0 33,729 1,114,372 Low CALIFORNIA 274,262 64,875 0 339,137 918,674 Low COLORADO 0 0 0 0 6,204 Low CONNECTICUT 0 375 0 375 25,630 Low DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 Low FLORIDA 14,388 37,714 0 52,102 44,936 Medium GEORGIA 0 0 0 0 13,687 Low GUAM & Am. Samoa 0 0 0 0 16 Low HAWAII 0 0 0 0 2,447 Low IDAHO 30,620 3,096 0 33,716 84,681 Low ILLONOIS 6,048 26,583 0 32,631 686,703 Low INDIANA 9,378 12,319 0 21,697 119,447 Low IOWA 1,886 3,594 0 5,480 184,455 Low KANSAS 18,797 149 1 18,947 767,168 Low KENTUCKY 10,732 3,806 0 14,538 146,705 Low LOUISIANA 1,292 0 0 1,292 7,378,160 Low MAINE 0 0 0 0 7 Low MARYLAND & DC 1,230 354 0 1,584 38,092 Low MASSACHUSETTS 5,441 305 0 5,746 21,053 Low MICHIGAN 0 2,160 0 2,160 5,024 Low MINNISOTA 10 9,048 0 9,058 36,727 Low MISSISSIPPI 4,420 0 0 4,420 627,492 Low MISSOURI 10,446 1,164 10 11,620 3,195,667 Low MONTANA 2,329 0 0 2,329 23,517 Low G-1O TABLE - 1 FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) During Fiscal Year 2000 Reduction by Reduction by Damages Prevented Total Flood Average *Comparision of Location Corps Supported Corps by Corps Supported Damages Reduction Damage 2000 to the Reservoirs Levees Emergency by the Corps Reduction Ten-Year Avg Operations of Engineers FY 1991-2000 FY 1991-2000 NEBRASKA 2,088 781 0 2,869 124,187 Low NEVADA 1,400 0 0 1,400 94,460 Low NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 0 708 Low NEW JERSEY 2,720 0 0 2,720 12,115 Low NEW MEXICO 0 2,999 47,078 50,076 64,945 Medium NEW YORK 22,881 48,668 0 71,549 138,706 Medium N. CAROLINA 556 0 0 556 103,479 Low N. DAKOTA 8,172 3,967 0 12,139 75,528 Low OHIO 82,457 11,215 0 93,672 245,955 Low OKLAHOMA 72,130 0 0 72,130 130,034 Medium OREGON 804,394 141,040 0 945,434 925,262 Medium PENNSYLVANIA 47,299 3,417 0 50,716 409,278 Low PUERTO RICO & VI 0 0 0 0 46,916 Low RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 1,355 Low S. CAROLINA 0 0 0 0 882 Low S. DAKOTA 0 457 0 457 8,318 Low TENNESSEE 0 0 0 0 63,532 Low TEXAS 556,830 802 0 557,632 2,317,258 Low UTAH 0 0 0 0 5,956 Low VERMONT 6,828 3,089 0 9,917 3,599 High VIRGINIA 19 7,817 0 7,836 36,201 Low WASHINGTON 7,772 202,919 1,750 212,441 325,265 Medium W. VIRGINA 70,205 9,143 0 79,348 226,375 Low WISCONSON 0 17 0 17 1,711 Low WYOMING 569 0 0 569 12,228 Low TOTALS 2,103,560 609,830 48,839 2,762,239 20,847,197 Low FY 2000 Damages Prevented in the U.S. = 13% of the 10-year (1991-2000) Average * LEGEND: LOW = Less than 1/2 average. HIGH = Twice to five times average. MED= 1/2 to twice average. VERY HIGH = More than five times average. G-11 TABLE - 2 TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 2000, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) Damages Damage Potential Percent Average Lives Lives LOCATION Suffered Reduction Damages Damages Damages Lost Lost FY FY 2000 FY 2000 FY 2000 Reduced Suffered FY2000 1991-2000 FY 2000 1991-2000 ALABAMA 3,087 0 3,087 0 50,776 0 17 ALASKA 110 200 310 0 9,302 0 0 ARIZONA 90 0 90 0 25,632 0 24 ARKANSAS 2773 33,729 36,502 92 3,729 0 4 CALIFORNIA 9238 339,137 348,375 97 450,453 0 59 COLORADO 297 0 297 0 44,047 1 10 CONNECTICUT 6010 375 6,385 6 2,100 0 1 DELAWARE 0 0 0 104 0 0 FLORIDA 499080 52,102 551,182 9 144,334 2 6 GEORGIA 2101 0 2,101 0 60,346 0 38 GUAM 650 0 650 0 478 0 0 HAWAII 400 0 400 0 4,192 0 8 IDAHO 85 33,716 33,801 100 18,174 0 1 ILLONOIS 3113 32,631 35,744 91 284,105 4 13 INDIANA 819 21,697 22,516 96 31,485 1 19 IOWA 14,877 5,480 20,357 27 646,227 3 13 KANSAS 250 18,947 19,197 99 66,630 0 10 KENTUCKY 17,631 14,538 32,169 45 60,812 1 37 LOUISIANA 153 1,292 1,445 89 335,631 0 11 MAINE 2,814 0 2,814 0 6,703 0 5 MARYLAND & DC 2,452 1,584 4,036 39 10,971 0 3 MASSACHUSETTS 206 5,746 5,952 97 10,171 0 1 MICHIGAN 25,430 2,160 27,590 8 8,818 0 4 MINNISOTA 43,112 9,058 52,170 17 176,249 1 7 MISSISSIPPI 408 4,420 4,828 92 35,994 0 3 MISSOURI 109,760 11,620 121,380 10 365,533 0 72 MONTANA 30 2,329 2,359 99 3,110 0 8 Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeros. G-12 TABLE - 2 TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 2000, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) Damages Damage Potential Percent Average Lives Lives LOCATION Suffered Reduction Damages Damages Damages Lost Lost FY FY 2000 FY 2000 FY 2000 Reduced Suffered FY2000 1991-2000 FY 2000 1991-2000 NEBRASKA 23,456 2,869 26,325 11 45,185 0 7 NEVADA 221 1,400 1,621 86 68,076 0 6 NEW HAMPSHIRE 515 0 515 0 1,728 0 1 NEW JERSEY 179,100 2,720 181,820 1 107,529 1 9 NEW MEXICO 160 50,076 50,236 100 4,351 0 9 NEW YORK 18,498 71,549 90,047 79 45,590 0 26 N. CAROLINA 7,605 556 8,161 7 324,666 0 51 N. DAKOTA 191,177 12,139 203,316 6 421,918 2 8 OHIO 8,839 93,672 102,511 91 45,007 4 30 OKLAHOMA 11,691 72,130 83,821 86 8,081 0 20 OREGON 5,734 945,434 951,168 99 340,667 0 10 PENNSYLVANIA 27,476 50,716 78,192 65 59,139 0 31 PUERTO RICO & 1,341 0 1,341 0 13,003 0 53 RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 19 0 0 S. CAROLINA 2,885 0 2,885 0 7,297 0 13 S. DAKOTA 457 457 100 90,401 0 5 TENNESSEE 230 0 230 0 12,312 0 25 TEXAS 25,130 557,632 582,762 96 187,659 4 146 UTAH 679 0 679 0 2,458 0 1 VERMONT 1,845 9,917 11,762 84 4,620 0 4 VIRGINIA 1,368 7,836 9,204 85 50,451 1 18 WASHINGTON 488 212,441 212,929 100 66,101 0 6 W. VIRGINA 11,003 79,348 90,351 88 31,075 3 31 WISCONSON 74,298 17 74,315 0 147,367 1 6 WYOMING 20 569 589 97 258 0 2 TOTALS 1,338,735 2,762,239 4,100,974 4,941,062 29 892 AVERAGE 67 89 Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeros. G-13 TABLE - 3 FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION FISCAL YEARS 1991 - 2000 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY 95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY2000 10 Yr. Avg ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 ALASKA 8,100 10,000 0 8,750 8,750 0 0 0 0 200.0 3,580 ARIZONA 0 3,945 113,000 0 140,456 5,202 13,219 4,180 5,018 0.0 28,502 ARKANSAS 478,008 65,947 161,070 861,023 1,350,558 1,066,854 5,733,106 712,907 680,519 33,729.0 1,114,372 CALIFORNIA 64,022 406,036 750,435 138 1,484,202 389,649 3,042,730 2,623,156 87,235 339,137.0 918,674 COLORADO 482 9,367 928 509 3,071 0 2,782 0 44,904 0.0 6,204 CONNECTICUT 100 4,228 56,339 25,746 305 74,414 11,518 55,971 27,303 375.0 25,630 DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 FLORIDA 1,305 17,591 19,155 5,342 104,072 66,655 13,486 103,780 65,873 52,102.0 44,936 GEORGIA 1,689 1,474 6,549 3,771 3,889 50,305 6,952 31,263 30,979 0.0 13,687 GUAM 0 0 44 45 68 0 0.0 16 HAWAII 5,457 194 10 6,728 5,126 4,608 2,349 0 0 0.0 2,447 IDAHO 23,018 253 85,743 9,844 54,948 190,618 272,955 77,578 98,136 33,716.0 84,681 ILLONOIS 64,996 10,369 2,483,431 94,914 2,664,865 553,925 557,829 361,233 42,836 32,631.0 686,703 INDIANA 149,239 27,288 106,604 128,040 24,661 152,440 273,661 180,836 130,000 21,697.0 119,447 IOWA 77,099 14,662 624,071 41,110 75,133 97,882 653,984 144,879 110,252 5,479.5 184,455 KANSAS 30,816 298,933 5,760,259 32,293 849,044 65,443 87,605 16,614 511,726 18,947.0 767,168 KENTUCKY 159,089 35,464 31,614 178,350 79,609 216,292 675,177 62,976 13,938 14,538.0 146,705 LOUISIANA 13,670,272 1,005,357 7,452,058 7,903,263 9,683,360 5,311,449 12,264,278 5,271,162 11,219,104 1,292.0 7,378,160 MAINE 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 MARYLAND & DC 14 93,074 71,225 0 2 214,782 220 14 3 1,584.0 38,092 MASSACHUSETTS 9,472 574 33,956 26,276 135 57,870 19,238 55,218 2,043 5,746.0 21,053 MICHIGAN 0 412 0 0 867 344 23,345 20,690 2,419 2,160.0 5,024 MINNISOTA 5,400 2,929 133,273 10,980 8,978 19,949 167,250 3,208 6,248 9,057.6 36,727 MISSISSIPPI 1,196,409 155,364 105,666 121,003 1,059,468 628,384 1,380,714 843,968 779,525 4,420.0 627,492 MISSOURI 200,669 299,878 9,793,809 769,333 5,740,837 2,240,713 7,903,399 227,701 4,768,711 11,620.0 3,195,667 MONTANA 15,408 4,483 20,070 6,542 13,004 49,674 101,164 11,947 10,552 2,329.0 23,517 G-14 TABLE - 3 G-15 FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION FISCAL YEARS 1991 - 2000 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY94 FY 95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY2000 10 Yr. Avg NEBRASKA 58,559 7,351 226,589 36,715 80,795 96,985 635,868 16,050 80,088 2,869.0 124,r87 NEVADA 0 0 0 0 63,611 19,974 852,687 3,149 3,780 1,400.0 94,460 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 3,549 250 0 1,250 943 916 171 0.0 708 NEW JERSEY 1,247 445 5,836 8,355 13,017 10,008 27,172 6,097 46,248 2,720 12,115 NEW MEXICO 91,189 27,619 109,486 164,439 29,195 116,598 52,598 453 7,799 50,076 64,945 NEW YORK 17,566 6,120 157,744 56,334 31,201 568,026 234,297 62,932 181,293 71,549 138,706 N. CAROLINA 23,231 8,474 24,023 54,536 26,823 558,461 65,769 114,667 158,248 556 103,479 N. DAKOTA 1,591 942 109,062 35,802 32,848 76,344 342,323 47,222 97,009 12,139 75,528 OHIO 250,242 6,601 107,340 312,590 47,934 828,586 397,145 318,700 96,744 93,672 245,955 OKLAHOMA 19,116 52,838 556,345 87,545 196,801 12,739 65,815 76,439 160,575 72,130 130,034 OREGON 42,633 47,243 87,844 83,039 1,342 2,755,876 4,203,503 419,550 666,153 945,434 925,262 PENNSYLVANIA 40,498 3,046 189,825 46,304 3,954 3,497,659 141,559 66,007 53,213 50,716 409,278 PUERTO RICO & VI 0 4,665 4,400 0 12,242 107,500 0 340,356 0 0 46,916 RHODE ISLAND 1,620 0 2,145 0 0 0 114 9,672 0 0 1,355 S. CAROLINA 2,849 625 300 2,268 943 955 149 735 0 0 882 5. DAKOTA 572 4,140 1,978 651 7,992 1,152 62,073 915 3,248 457 8,318 TENNESSEE 310,926 496 768 35,528 39,500 31,000 193,158 5,876 18,067 0 63,532 TEXAS 13,860 5,197,449 2,631,802 5,707,236 2,672,764 4,736 5,113,947 646,713 626,444 557,632 2,317,258 UTAH 1,500 700 34,326 4,553 0 0 8,120 0 10,361 0 5,956 VERMONT 2,525 2,275 1,892 3,006 3,304 4,200 3,355 3,752 1,760 9,917 3,599 VIRGINIA 1,686 124,553 18,683 3,621 5,736 135,894 5,598 41,446 16,956 7,836 36,201 WASHINGTON 357,877 54,343 67,028 65,935 6,228 732,293 1,120,921 353,805 281,780 212,441 325,265 W. VIRGINA 76,882 40,152 98,580 103,464 129,065 1,272,486 395,426 62,851 5,491 79,348 226,375 WISCONSON 0 0 13,914 65 31 473 2,296 210 103 17 1,711 WYOMING 4,424 1,373 22,095 3,750 19,548 23,480 29,217 9,020 8,805 569 12,228 TOTALS 17,481,657 8,059,272 32,284,819 17,049,941 26,780,284 22,314,171 47,161,059 13,416,882 21,161,659 2,762,229 20,847,197 TABLE 4 TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE FISCAL YEARS 1991-2000 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000 10 Yr. Avg. ALABAMA 15,055 320 0 112,696 0 1,649 1,354 368,938 4,663 3,087 50,776 ALASKA 0 7,302 0 74,000 10,025 0 1,271 314 0 110 9,302 ARIZONA 258 5,189 228,900 1,616 6,618 701 85 66 12796 90 25,632 ARKANSAS 12,006 909 2,680 2,024 0 205 12,874 2045 1777 2773 3,729 CALIFORNIA 3,376 93,152 165,920 1,792 1,495,960 13,205 2,086,125 621588 14176 9238 450,453 COLORADO 2,820 1,602 100 1,242 18,240 4,058 358,890 2550 50675 297 44,047 CONNECTICUT 16 10,366 0 1,316 0 2,092 52 40 1112 6010 2,100 DELAWARE 0 2 0 741 0 300 0 0 0 104 FLORIDA 0 41,938 2,080 182,605 18,536 158,001 49,707 431311 60080 499080 144,334 GEORGIA 106,158 1,156 7,340 300,000 8,845 2,581 464 166291 8520 2101 60,346 GUAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3725 400 650 478 HAWAII 23,715 9,260 2,910 3,700 0 1,935 0 0 0 400 4,192 IDAHO 2,574 224 0 0 2,096 49,400 125,060 1005 1297 85 18,174 ILLINOIS 19,834 189 2,640,140 32,606 27,240 107,585 4,295 2380 3666 3113 284,105 INDIANA 89,504 45,424 9,550 2,852 6,789 21,575 68,598 19611 50124 819 31,485 IOWA 195,703 50,800 5,740,000 9,124 3,498 165,265 3,680 168,101 111,221 14,877 646,227 KANSAS 16,551 10,127 551,070 10,437 8,874 3,969 102 4,888 60,030 250 66,630 KENTUCKY 9,034 46,870 4,980 2,544 17,673 21,323 470,915 16,639 506 17,631 60,812 LOUISIANA 221,720 4,191 4,020 675 3,097,250 121 4,359 17,845 5,979 153 335,631 MAINE 16,336 2,179 3,040 9,323 0 4,916 26,845 0 1,580 2,814 6,703 MARYLAND & DC 48 339 0 4,524 1,620 90,481 198 334 9,715 2,452 10,971 MASSACHUSETTS 9,716 176 160 0 0 2,663 75,024 13,510 250 206 10,171 MICHIGAN 6,133 355 1,600 6,236 2,900 26,690 325 18,190 325 25,430 8,818 MINNISOTA 1,280 1,760 964,050 1,867 3,750 460 743,218 2,529 466 43;112 176,249 MISSISSIPPI 313,359 1,010 4,480 1,352 1,092 200 32,774 3,498 1,769 408 35,994 MISSOURI 1,960 2,044 3,429,630 37,864 25,415 871 692 10,227 36,862 109,760 365,533 MONTANA 10,743 1,403 6,720 3,392 510 2,243 2,874 3,001 184 30 3,110 Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeroes. G-16 TABLE 4 TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE FISCAL YEARS 1991-2000 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS LOCATION FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000 Yr. Avg NEBRASKA 53,615 6,683 294,500 2,710 5,129 31,233 10,273 1,483 22,765 23,456 45,185 NEVADA 2 1,621 0 160 11,970 370 640,110 1,300 25,009 221 68,076 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 0 110 4,000 10,952 700 1,002 515 1,728 NEW JERSEY 16,002 500 0 3,520 0 36,720 38,700 750 800,000 179,100 107,529 NEW MEXICO 1,567 32,264 210 2,000 954 1,285 380 713 3,980 160 4,351 NEW YORK 19,603 1,862 55,480 25,707 1,485 220,011 55,909 38,627 18,715 18,498 45,590 N. CAROLINA 2,694 12,927 1,400 2,032 26,596 42,119 17,994 16,135 3,117,160 7,605 324,666 N. DAKOTA 32 0 413,600 58,552 44,366 220 3,408,298 2,583 100,355 191,177 421,918 OHIO 55,165 20,078 25,800 39,913 28,511 22,721 66,666 181,409 963 8,839 45,007 OKLAHOMA 90 10,871 44,720 166 3,275 0 155 262 9,578 11,691 8,081 OREGON 9,010 32 1,760 0 11,320 3,203,500 173,200 10 2,100 5,734 340,667 PENNSYLVANIA 8,342 1,805 440 16,194 10,385 494,862 3,136 1,103 27,642 27,476 59,139 PUERTO RICO & VI 16 90,127 5,300 160 115 131 157 28,190 4,488 1,341 13,003 RHODE ISLAND 174 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 S. CAROLINA 11,871 0 17,920 6,228 28,169 668 1,105 4,044 75 2,885 7,297 S. DAKOTA 2,934 3,460 763,380 20,399 12,270 360 100,541 50 619 90,401 TENNESSEE 13,109 204 5,070 51,039 1,264 2,740 23,479 25,427 554 230 12,312 TEXAS 188,766 199,356 56,990 1,721 85,050 407,066 136,472 163,407 612,634 25,130 187,659 UTAH 6,005 24 160 0 1,500 312 10,100 4,485 1,314 679 2,458 VERMONT 19 2 7,550 1,502 5,150 5,123 170 23,805 1,036 1,845 4,620 VIRGINIA 984 7,371 0 16,169 66,759 153,516 898 2,381 255,062 1,368 50,451 WASHINGTON 227,634 176 2,080 160 250 370,060 54,675 3,120 2,371 488 66,101 W. VIRGINA 908 5,791 620 5,397 8,595 224,172 18,391 35,506 363 11,003 31,075 WISCONSON 180 29,305 903,660 62,052 675 218,025 93,346 82,825 9,305 74,298 147,367 WYOMING 2,160 0 0 0 0 181 192 22 0 20 258 TOTALS 1,698,781 762,762 16,370,010 1,120,309 5,110,829 6,121,884 8,935,080 2,496,963 5,455,263 1,338,735 4,941,062 Damage values of less than $50 thousand dollars are shown as zeroes. G-17 TABLE - 5 TOTAL LIVES LOST, BY STATE FISCAL YEARS 1991-2000 LOCATION FY 1991 FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY2000 10-Yr Total ALABAMA 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 9 1 0 17 ALASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ARIZONA 1 3 3 0 1 0 12 4 0 0 24 ARKANSAS 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 CALIFORNIA 2 2 17 2 8 2 7 16 3 0 59 COLORADO 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 1 10 CONNECTICUT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLORIDA 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 6 GEORGIA 4 1 3 29 0 0 0 1 0 0 38 GUAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HAWAII 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 IDAHO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ILLINOIS 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 4 13 INDIANA 3 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 4 1 19 IOWA 3 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 13 KANSAS 0 1 3 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 10 KENTUCKY 2 8 2 0 2 2 16 2 2 1 37 LOUISIANA 2 1 0 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 11 MAINE 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 MARYLAND & DC 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 MASSACHUSETTS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MICHIGAN 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 MINNISOTA 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 MISSISSIPPI 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 MISSOURI 0 0 29 11 3 7 4 4 14 0 72 MONTANA 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 NEBRASKA 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 NEVADA 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 6 G-18 TABLE - 5 TOTAL LIVES LOST, BY STATE FISCAL YEARS 1991-2000 LOCATION FY 1991 FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY2000 10-Yr Total NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NEW JERSEY 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 5 1 9 NEW MEXICO 4 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 9 NEW YORK 2 0 7 3 0 10 0 3 1 0 26 N. CAROLINA 3 2 1 0 9 1 3 0 32 0 51 N. DAKOTA 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 8 OHIO 0 2 0 1 5 3 5 8 2 4 30 OKLAHOMA 0 2 5 0 4 0 3 4 2 0 20 OREGON 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 2 0 0 10 PENNSYLVANIA 1 0 0 1 4 25 0 0 0 0 31 PUERTO RICO & VI 1 25 3 0 1 19 0 1 3 0 53 RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S. CAROLINA 5 0 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 13 S. DAKOTA 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 TENNESSEE 0 2 0 3 0 3 4 13 0 0 25 TEXAS 3 19 6 0 48 0 19 19 28 4 146 UTAH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 VERMONT 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 VIRGINIA 2 1 1 2 2 9 0 0 0 1 18 WASHINGTON 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 W. VIRGINA 1 3 0 5 0 12 5 2 0 3 31 WISCONSON 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 6 WYOMING 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTALS 58 87 109 70 103 131 98 102 105 29 892 G-19 TABLE - 6 REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FISCAL YEARS 1980-2000 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) REGION FY80 FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 NEW ENGLAND 75,911 53,661 239,970 9,496 839,029 625 665 463,321 0 250 63,094 MID-ADLANTIC 16,740 24,171 10,419 25,703 2,486,292 18,823 357,665 30,340 26,450 24,802 16,607 GULF & S. ATLANTIC 28,086 2,499 24,398 49,384 27,756 21,301 41,774 219,938 11,438 30,014 57,057 OHIO 289,655 231,431 188,802 207,363 556,603 268,796 633,658 172,866 63,538 285,510 248,699 TENNESSEE 0 0 0 0 0 45 570 4,376 0 16,176 3,082 GREAT LAKES 9,594 9,842 27,836 5,856 24,953 30,107 28,071 51,245 9,587 24,982 16,849 UPPER MISSISSIPPI 0 11,622 96,150 251,594 66,209 57,941 113,777 430,592 1,576 6,761 516,506 SOURIS-RED-RAINY 0 0 0 2,700 1,314 1,721 18,966 52,015 411 68,814 7,156 MISSOURI 2,243 89,862 370,993 435,296 1,077,828 32,555 860,513 1,504,538 2,669 176,066 250,873 ARKANSAS-RED-WHITE 108,025 11,617 55,960 161,010 88,788 168,558 174,737 996,615 161,923 186,727 456,041 LOWER MISSISSIPPI 4,087,675 3,067 552,850 20,386,036 10,294,428 9,820,704 9,336,140 666,758 1,453,371 5,970,206 10,820,837 RIO GRANDE 46,260 889 2,526 29,918 98,419 127,698 87,139 113,621 21,528 2,755 42,531 TEXAS AND GULF 14,910 83,436 441,874 17,537 8,513 28,840 208,168 190,914 6,026 535,689 4,105,103 COLORADO 117,761 0 0 13,000 90,630 14,300 0 0 00 0 GREAT BASIN 0 0 8,000 15,015 18,600 2,200 16,300 0 0 500 500 CALIFORNIA 1,981,428 680 307,013 1,075,869 102,360 72,800 13,910,920 154,858 98 4,770 9,500 COLUMBIA N PACIFIC 514,257 633,016 1,939,909 547,510 979,308 94,350 1,521,659 125,995 296,159 918,874 962,433 ALASKA 2,117 4,473 4,741 4,885 5,055 6,846 6,828 17,000 0 8,000 0 HAWAII & GUAM 4,254 220 800 624 0 0 220 220 8,540 82 1,085 TOTALS 7,298,916 1,160,486 4,272,241 23,238,796 16,766,085 10,768,210 27,317,770 5,195,212 2,063,314 8,260,978 17,577,953 G-20 TABLE - 6 REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FISCAL YEARS 1980-2000 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) REGION FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY2000 1991-2000 Avq NEW ENGLAND 11,010 4,528 95,580 51,906 375 132,805 31,243 121,825 29,147 680 47,910 MID-ADLANTIC 8,993 97,947 277,641 34,455 33,530 1,881,703 224,560 79,819 250,493 97,647 298,679 GULF & S. ATLANTIC 31,003 150,717 70,326 68,517 149,705 830,955 88,877 598,430 257,000 52,668 229,820 OHIO 655,077 102,832 369,414 714,206 248,096 4,809,346 1,706,408 726,721 281,676 253,742 986,752 TENNESSEE 334,809 18,920 13,304 52,909 12,480 2,305 131,135 8,326 5,017 0 57,921 GREAT LAKES 19,100 5,702 124,935 50,981 24,810 141,824 112,230 25,977 19,190 13,979 53,873 UPPER MISSISSIPPI 27,200 19,043 1,303,564 14,979 7,147 22,160 570,094 390,463 99,151 45,675 249,948 SOURIS-RED-RAINY 4,700 517 91,473 6,875 28,686 67,053 154,001 36,316 76,877 8,153 47,465 MISSOURI 272,237 609,640 11,573,040 206,912 4,466,330 2,199,478 7,207,086 177,769 5,111,491 21,228 3,184,521 ARKANSAS-RED-WHITE 43,396 87,792 949,112 206,387 469,242 60,386 187,332 183,987 688,697 122,313 299,864 LOWER MISSISSIPPI 15,457,393 1,213,731 13,538,946 9,589,003 16,904,365 7,925,144 22,033,170 6,933,597 12,507,805 6,217 10,610,937 RIO GRANDE 91,189 39,619 109,486 164,439 29,195 116,598 52,598 453 52,570 50,076 70,622 TEXAS AND GULF 13,717 5,184,633 2,621,230 5,705,933 2,632,986 4,425 5,113,613 646,241 626,317 557,532 2,310,663 COLORADO 0 3,945 147,326 0 204,067 25,176 31,616 7,329 8,931 1,400 42,979 GREAT BASIN 1,500 700 0 4,553 0 0 842,730 0 10,361 0 85,984 CALIFORNIA 64,022 406,036 750,435 138 1,484,202 389,649 3,042,730 2,623,156 87,235 339,137 918,674 COLUMBIA N PACIFIC 432,754 102,776 248,997 162,270 71,192 3,700,512 5,629,242 856,406 1,049,702 1,191,591 1,344,544 ALASKA 8,100 10,000 0 8,750 8,750 0 0 0 0 200 3,580 HAWAII & GUAM 5,457 194 10 6,728 5,126 4,652 2,394 68 0 0 2,463 TOTALS 17,481,657 8,059,272 32,284,819 17,049,941 26,780,284 22,314,171 47,161,059 13,416,883 21,161,659 2,762,239 20,847,198 G-21 TABLE 7 2000 ATLANTIC OCEAN TROPICAL CYCLONES AND THEIR EFFECTS NAME Category CLASS DATES Max Min Damages Lives Wind Pressure In U.S.A. Lost in (Kt.) (MB) ($ Million) U.S.A. ALBERTO 3 Hurricane 04-23 AUG 80 950 BERYL -- Tropical Storm 13-15 AUG 45 1007 1 CHRIS -- Tropical Storm 18-19 AUG 35 1005 DEBBY 1 Hurricane 19-24 AUG 65 991 ** 1* ERNESTO -- Tropical Storm 02-03 SEP 35 1005 FLORENCE 1 Hurricane 11-17 SEP 70 985 3 GORDON 1 Hurricane 14-18 SEP 65 981 10.8 24 HELENE -- Tropical Storm 15-22 SEP 55 996 1 ISAAC 4 Hurricane 21 SEP-01 OCT 120 943 1 JOYCE 1 Hurricane 25 SEP-02 OCT 80 976 KEITH 4 Tropical Storm 28 SEP-06 OCT 115 942 24 LESLIE -- Tropical Storm 05-07 OCT 35 1006 MICHAEL 2 Hurricane 17-20 OCT 85 965 NADINE -- Tropical Storm 19-22 OCT 50 * Indirect death -- man fell from roof preparing for storm. ** Data not available Saffin-Simpson Scale for Wind Speed Tropical Storm: 34-39 kt. (39 to 73mph) Hurricane: 64 kt. (74 mph) or highter G-22 A Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD (NWO) 26-3, 26-19, 26-26 Abiquiu Dam, NM (SPA) 36-5, 36-14, 36-18 Acequias Irrigation System, NM (SPA) 36-1, 36-13, 36-16 Active Investigations (SAC) 7-10, 7-25 Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX (SWG) 40-16 Addison, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-29 Adkin Branch, Kinston, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-22 Advance Engineering and Design Alaska District (POA) 32-7 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-26 Detroit District (LRE) 21-52 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-16 Galveston District (SWG) 40-23 Honolulu District (POH) 31-4 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 36-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 Louisville District (LRL) 24-15, 24-41 Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Nashville District (LRN) 23-9 New England Division (NAE) 1-30 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-14 Portland District (NWP) 28-28 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-8 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-32 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-11 Savannah District (SAS) 8-9 Seattle District (NWS) 29-14 St. Paul 16-14 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-12 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-20 Aitkin County, CSAH 10, MN (MVP) 16-3, 16- 15, 16-19 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA (SAM) 10-3, 10-27, 10-47 Alamo Dam, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-22 Alamogordo, NM (SPA) 36-2, 36-13, 36-16 Alamosa, CO (SPA) 36-2, 36-13, 36-16 Albeni Falls Dam, ID (NWS) 29-10, 29-19, 29-26 Algoma Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-2, 21-54, 21-73 Alil Drive Shoreline Protection, Hawaii, Hawaii (POH) 31-3, 31-5 Allatoona Dam - Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM) 10-21, 10-31, 10-41 Allegheny River, PA (LRP) 18-2, 18-15, 18-19, 18-29, 18-34 Allendale Dam, North Provide LRE, RI (NAE) 1-15, 1-35, 1-49 Almond Lake, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-30 Aloha Rigolette, LA (MVK) 12-3, 12-9, 12-11 Alpena Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-3, 21-54, 21-73 Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (MVS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-12 Alum Creek Lake, OH (LRH) 25-3, 25-15, 25-22 Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA (NAB) 4-20 American River (Natonas) (SPK) 35-6, 35-39 American River Watershed, CA (SPK) 35-6, 35- 38, 35-48 Amite River and Tribs, LA, East Baton Rouge Watershed (MVN) 11-4, 11-22, 11-25 Anacostia River and Tributaries, MD & DC (NAB) 4-22, 4-33, 4-40 Anahuac Channel, TX (SWG) 40-13 Anchorage Harbor, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13 Andrews River (NAE) 1-3, 1-31, 1-42, 1-72 Apalachicola Bay, FL (SAM) 10-4, 10-27, 10-33 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA (SAM) 10-4, 10-27, 10-48 Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NWP) 28-12, 28-32, 28-42 Appomattox River, VA (NAO) 5-2 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Baltimore District (NAB) 4-25 Galveston District (SWG) 40-22 Mobile District (SAM) 10-25 Philadelphia District ((NAP) 3-18 Pittsburgh, District (LRP) 18-14 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston District (SAC) 7-1, 7-11, 7-15, 7-21 Galveston District (SWG) 40-3, 40-24, 40-30, 40-48 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-3, 9-40, 9-53 Mobile District (SAM) 10-6 New York District (NAN) 2-3, 2-25, 2-18, 2-33 I-1 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-18 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-2, 6-21, 6-30 Aquilla Lake, TX (SWF) 39-3, 39-18, 39-24 Arcadia Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-3, 21-54, 21-73 Arcadia Lake, OK (SWT) 38-2, 38-15, 38-24 Area V, Estelline Springs, TX (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 Area VIII, TX (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 Arecibo Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-40, 9-53 Arkansas City, KS (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK and TX (SWT) 38-3, 38-15, 38-24 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS (SWL) 37-2, 37-20, 37-25, 37-28 Arkport Dam, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-30 Aroostock River, Fort Fairfield, ME (NAE) 1-16, 1-35, 1-49 Arroyo Colorado, TX (SWG) 40-20 Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9), AR (SWL) 37-3, 37-25 Ashland Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-4, 21-54, 21-73 Ashtabula Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-2, 20-14, 20-21 Assateague Island (NAB) 4-10, 4-29, 4-37 Atlantic Coast of Maryland (NAB) 4-10, 4-29, 4-37 Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet; Long Beach Island, NY (NAN) 2-14, 2-26, 2-32 Atlantic Intracoastal Bridge at Great Bridge, VA (NAO) 5-4 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Deep Creek, VA (NAO) 5-3 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (NAO) 5-2 (SAW) 6-2, 6-21, 6-27, (SAC) 7-2, 7-9, 7-12 (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-14 (SAJ) 9-3, 9-40, 9-53 Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA (NAE) 1-3, 1-31, 1-42 AuSable Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-4, 21-54, 21-73 Authorized Alteration of Bridges (LRN) 23-4 Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects (LRE) 21-39 Avoca, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-30 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA (NAB) 4-12, 4-29, 4-38 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-22 Back River, Poquoson, VA (NAO) 5-4 Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-40, 9-54 Ball Mountain Lake, VT (NAE) 1-18, 1-36 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA (NAB) 4-3, 4-27, 4-34 Baltimore Harbor, MD Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-27, 4-35 Barcelona Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-2, 20-14 Bardwell Lake, TX (SWF) 39-4, 39-18, 39-24 Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-20, 3-25 Barre Falls Dam, MA (NAE) 1-18, 1-36 Barren River Lake, KY (LRL) 24-6, 24-17 Bassett Creek, MN (MVP) 16-3, 16-15, 16-19 Battery Island Bird Habitat Preservation, NC (CAP Section 204) (SAW) 6-20, 6-24 Bay Port Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-4, 21-54, 21-73 Bayou Coden, AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-27, 10-33 Bayou La Batre, AL (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-33 Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Chicago District (LRC) 22-11 Detroit District (LRE) 21-40 Honolulu District (POH) 31-3 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-30 New York District (NAN) 2-19 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-7 Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX (SWF) 39-4, 39- 18, 39-24, 39-30 Bear Creek Lake, CO (NWO) 26-3, 26-19, 26- 26 Beaver Lake, AR (SWL) 37-10, 37-18, 37-29 Beaver Tail Water Restoration (SWL) 37-15 Beech Fork Lake, WV (LRH) 25-3, 25-15, 25-22 Belhaven Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-22 Bellingham Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-2, 29-16, 29-23 Belton Lake, TX (SWF) 39-4, 39-18, 39-24 Beltzville Lake, PA (NAP) 3-13, 3-23, 3-31 Benbrook Lake, TX (SWF) 39-5, 39-18, 39-24 Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material Galveston (SWG) 40-22 Bennett's Creek, VA (NAO) 5-4 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRP) 18-7, 18-16, 18-21 I-2 Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (POA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-15 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD (NWO) 26-14, 26-24, 26-30 Big Sioux River & Skunk Creek, Sioux Falls, SD (NWO) 26-4, 26-19, 26-26 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN (LRN) 23-5, 23-10 Big Suamico River, WI (LRE) 21-5, 21-55, 21- 74 Biloxi Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-33 Binghamton, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-31 Birch Hill Dam, MA (NAE) 1-18, 1-36 Birch Lake, OK (SWT) 38-4, 38-16, 38-24 Black Fox, Murfree and Oaklands Springs, TN (LRN) 23-5, 23-10 Black River (Port Huron), MI (LRE) 21-5, 21-55, 21-74 Black River Harbor (U.P.) MI, (LRE) 21-6, 21- 55, 21-74, 21-92 Black River Poplar Bluff, MO (SWL) 37-5, 37- 16, 37-23 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-2, 20-21, 20-40 Black Rock Lake, CT (NAE) 1-21, 1-38 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-8, 10-28, 10-34, 10-49 Black Warrior River, Northport Levee, AL (SAM) 10-17, 10-30, 10-40 Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI (NAE) 1- 16, 1-56, 1-66 Blackwater Dam, NH (NAE) 1-23, 1-38 Blair Waterway, Tacoma, WA (NWS) 29-2, 29- 16, 29-23 Blue Marsh Lake, PA (NAP) 3-13, 3-23, 3-31 Blue Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 37-5, 37-16, 37-28 Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO (NWK) 27- 2, 27-12, 27-16 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO (NWK) 27-3, 27-12, 27-16 Blue River Lake, OR (NWP) 28-13, 28-32, 28- 42 Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-3, 25-15, 25-22 Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-28, 10-35 Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA (NWP) 28-19, 28-34, 28-43, 28-58 Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (NWP) 28-2, 28-30, 28-37 Boston Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-3, 1-31, 1-42, 1- 60, 1-72 Bowie County Levee, TX (SWT) 38-4, 38-16, 38-24 Bowman-Haley Lake, ND (NWO) 26-4, 26-19, 26-26 Boyer Chute, NE (NWO) 26-11, 26-23, 26-29, 26-47 Brays Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-16 Brazos Island Harbor, (SWG) 40-3, 40-24, 40-30, 40-51, 40-54, 40-61 Brevard County, FL (SAJ) 9-22, 9-47, 9-72 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (NAE) 1-4, 1-31, 1-43, 1-60 Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, NJ (Absecon Island, NJ) (NAP) 3-11, 3-22, 3-30 Broad Top Region, PA (NAB) 4-10, 4-29, 4-38 Broken Bow Lake, OK (SWT) 38-12, 38-22, 38-26 Brookville Lake, KY (LRL) 24-7, 24-17 Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-22, 9-47, 9-72 Brunswick County Beaches N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina-South Carolina State Line) (SAW) 6-10, 6-23 Brunswick Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-15 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (NWK) 27-3, 27-12, 27-16 Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-39 Buckhorn Lake, KY (LRL) 24-7, 24-17 Buffalo Bayou, TX (Lynchburg Pump Station) (SWG) 40-18, 40-27 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 40-15, 40-27, 40-45 Buffalo Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-3, 20-14, 20-22 Buffalo Harbor Environmental Dredging (LRB) 20-3, 20-14, 20-24 Buffumville Lake, MA (NAE) 1-26, 1-39 Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-22, 10-31, 10-42 Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND (NWO) 26-4, 26-19, 26-26 Bull Shoals Lake, AR (SWL) 37-10, 37-18, 30- 29 I-3 Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (LRC) 22-4, 22-17, 22-26 Burns Waterway SBH, IN (LRC) 22-3, 22-17, 22-21, 22-26 Burns Waterway Harbor (Maj. Rehab), IN (LRC) 22-3, 22-17, 22-21, 22-26 Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-4, 25-16, 25-22 Buttermilk Channel, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-25, 2- 28, 2-36 C Cache Creek Basin, (Cache Creek Settling Basin), CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-39 Caesar Creek Lake, OH (LRL) 24-7, 24-18 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (LRL) 24-7, 24-18 Calabash Creek, Brunswick County SC (SAC) 7-7, 7-13, 7-19 Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA (SPK) 35-7, 35-39 California Bend, NE (NWO) 26-11, 26-23, 26- 29, 26-47 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (LRC) 22-4, 22-17, 22-21, 22-26 Canaveral Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-40, 9-54, 9- 87 Candy Lake, OK (SWT) 38-4, 38-16, 38-24, 38-28 Canisteo, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-31 Canton Lake, OK (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24, 38-28 Canyon Lake, TX (SWF) 39-5, 39-19, 39-24 Cape Cod Canal, MA (NAE) 1-4, 1-31, 1-43 Cape Fear River, Above Wilmington, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-21 Cape Fear River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-9 Cape Fear River I&D No. 1 Fish Ladder, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) (SAW) 6-18, 6-24 Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO (MVS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-12 Cape Marsh Management Area, Santee Coastal Reserve, Charleston, SC (SAC) 7-9, 7-14, 7-20 Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (NAP) 3-11, 3-22, 3-30 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-23 Carpenters Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-18 Carr Creek Lake, KY (LRL) 24-8, 24-18 Carrabelle Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-10, 10-28, 10- 35 Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA (SAM) 10-22, 10-31, 10-47 Caseville Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-6, 21-55, 21-74 Casino Beach, IL (LRC) 22-9, 22-18, 22-24 Castle Pinkney, Charleston, SC (SAC) 7-8, 7- 14, 7-20 Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program (MVN) 11-9 (MVK) 12-9 (MVS) 14-6 (MVR) 15-8 (NWK) 27-10 (SAS) 8-10 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-4, 20-15, 20-24 Cave Run Lake, KY (LRL) 24-8, 24-18 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN (LRL) 24-9, 24-18 Cedar Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-2, 40-24, 40-31, 40-52, 40-54 Cedar Point Seawall Bay, St. Louis, MS (SAM) 10-17, 10-30, 10-40 Cedar River Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-7, 21-55, 21- 74 Cedar River, Renton, WA (NWS) 29-8, 29-18, 29-25, 29-30 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN (LRN) 23-7, 23-10 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-30, 9-50, 9-76, 9-84, 9-90, 9-91, 9-93 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-41, 9-54 Channel Islands Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-13, 33-17, 33-32 Channel to Bolivar, TX (SWG) 40-4, 40-24 40- 31, 40-52, 40-54, 40-61 Channel to Liberty, TX (SWG) 40-13 Channel to Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-5 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA (NAE) 1-16, 1-36 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC (SAC) 7-3, 7-11, 7-17 Charleston Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-2, 7-11, 7-16, 7-23 Charlevoix Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-7, 21-56, 21-74 Charlotte Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-41, 9-54, 9- 86 Chaska, MN (MVP) 16-4, 16-15, 16-19, 16-30 Chatfield Lake, CO (NWO) 26-5, 26-19, 26-26 I-4 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-5, 1-32, 1-44, 1-72 Chena River Lakes, AK (POA) 32-5, 32-11, 32- 15 Cherry Creek Lake, CO (NWO) 26-5, 26-20, 26-26 Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE, (NAP) 3-2, 3-20, 3-25 Chesapeake Bay Environmental Prog., MD (NAB) 4-23, 4-33, 4-40 Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD (NAB) 4-23, 4-33, 4-40 Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, VA (NAO) 5-5 Chetco River, OR (NWP) 28-2, 28-30, 28-37 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (NOW) 26-12, 26- 23, 26-29, 26-47 Chicago Harbor, IL (LRC) 22-5, 22-17, 22-22, 22-26 Chicago River, IL (LRC) 22-5, 22-18, 22-22, 22-26 Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (LRC) 22-11, 22-19 Chicago Shoreline, IL (LRC) 22-9, 22-19 Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA (NWS) 29-1', 29-19, 29-26 Chignik Harbor, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13 Chincoteague Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-6 Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, FL and AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-30, 10-40 Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers Elba and Geneva Levees, Al (SAM) 10-18, 10-30, 10-40 Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-3, 10-27, 10-47 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH (LRL) 24-9, 24-18 Clear Creek (SWG) 40-18, 40-27, 40-46 Clear Creek and Clear Lake (SWG) 40-4, 40- 24, 40-31, 40-52, 40-54 Clearwater Lake, MO (SWL) 37-6, 37-17, 37- 29 Cleveland Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-4, 20-15, 20-24 Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-22 Clinton Harbor, CT (NAE) 1-5, 10-32, 10-44, 1-60 Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (NWK) 27-3, 27-12, 27-16 Clinton River, MI (LRE) 21-8, 21-56, 21-74 Clinton River Spillway, MI (LRE) 21-42, 21-70, 21-86 Clinton Wastewater Treatment & Plant, Clinton, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-23 Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act (MVN) 11-10 Cocheco River, NH (NAE) 1-6, 1-32, 1-44 Cochiti Lake, NM (SPA) 36-5, 36-14, 36-18 Cohassett Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-6, 1-32, 1-44, 1-60, 1-72 Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-20, 3-25 Colebrook River Lake, CT (NAE) 1-18, 1-36 Coleman Creek, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 37-14 Collection and Study of Basic Data Alaska District (POA) 32-6 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-26 Chicago District (LRC) 22-16 Detroit District (LRE) 21-52 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-17 Galveston District (SWG) 40-23 Honolulu District (POH) 31-3 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-12 Louisville District (LRL) 24-15, 24-42 Memphis District (MVM) 13-3 Mobile District (SAM) 10-36 Nashville District (LRN) 23-9 New England Division (NAE) 1-30 New York District (NAN) 2-24 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-15 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-14 Portland District (NWP) 28-28 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-8 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-32 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-11 Savannah District (SAS) 8-9 Seattle District (NWS) 29-14 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-14 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-14, 38-31 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-12 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-20 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (SPK) 35-8, 35-39 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (NWP) 28-3, 28-30, 28-37 I-5 Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA (NWP) 28-4, 28-30, 28-38 Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA (NWP) 28-5, 28-30, 28-38 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NWW) 30-2, 30-16 Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island (NWP) 28-4, 28-30, 28-38 Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR (NWP) 28-5, 28-30, 28-38 Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles, Project), OR and WA (NWP) 28-25, 28-35, 28-46 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (Walla Walla District) (NWW) 30-4, 30-13, 30-17 Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR (NWP) 28-6, 28-30, 28-39 Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and WA (NWP) 28-20, 28-34, 28-44 Comite River, LA (Diversion) (MVN) 11-5, 11- 13, 11-17, 11-27 Conant Brook Dam, MA (NAE) 1-19, 1-36 Conchas Lake, NM (SPA) 36-2, 36-13 Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-7, 18-16, 18-21 Conneaut Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-5, 20-15, 20-27, 20-40 Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT (NAE) 1-17 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (LRL) 24-2, 24-16 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (LRH) 25-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (OR) 19-1, 19-5, 19-6, 19-7, 19-8 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (LRP) 18-2 Continuing Authorities Program (NWK) 27-9 Continuation of Planning and Engineering Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Cook Inlet, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13 Cooper Creek, Cherry Valley, AR (MVM) 13-1, 13-4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-3, 7-11, 7-17 Coordination with other Agencies (LRL) 24-15, 24-42 (SWG) 40-22 (MVM) 13-3 (SAS) 8-9 Coos Bay, OR (NWP) 28-6, 28-31, 28-39 Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-4, 10-27 Copan Lake, OK (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24 Coquille River, OR (NWP) 28-7, 28-31, 28-40 Coralville Lake, IA (MVR) 15-4, 15 9, 15-13 Coming, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 Cornucopia Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-9, 21-56, 21-75 Corpus Christi Beach, TX (SWG) 40-15, 40-27, 40-45 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 40-4, 40-24, 40-31, 40-51, 40-52, 40-55, 40- 61 Corte Madera Creek, CA (SPK) 35-9, 35-46, 35-49 (SPN) 34-7, 34-23 Cottage Grove Lake, OR (NWP) 28-13, 28-32, 28-42 Cougar Lake, OR (NWP) 28-20, 28-34, 28-44 Council Grove Lake, KS (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24 Cowanesque Lake, PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-32 Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-9, 35-40, 35-48, 35-53 Crescent City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-1, 34-15, 34-21 Crisfield Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-27, 4-35 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-8, 18-16, 18-21 Cross Florida Barge Canal, (SAJ) 9-5, 9-41, 9-55, 9-87 Crookston, MN (MVP) 16-4, 16-15, 16-19, 16- 34 Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-11, 4-29, 4-38 Cumberland River, TN and KY (LRN) 23-2, 23-10, 23-12, 23-16 Curwensville Lake, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-32 Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-6, 1-32, 1-44 Cypress Creek, TX (SWG) 40-19, 40-27, 40-46 D Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-32, 9-50 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-33, 9-50 1-6 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY (LRN) 23-7, 23-10 Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR (SWL) 37-11, 37-18, 37-25 Dauphin Island, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-28, 10- 35 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR (SWL) 37-3, 37-25 Deauthorization Projects New York District (NAN) 2-24, Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-45 Deep Water Slough, WA (NWS) 29-12, 29-20, 29-27 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-4, 25-16, 25-22 Delaware Coast Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island DE (Dewey/Rehoboth, DE) 3-12, 3-22, 3-30 Delaware Coast Protection, DE (NAP) 3-12, 3- 23, 3-31 Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-4, 25-16, 25-22 Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-20, 3-25 Delaware River, PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-20, 3-26 Delaware River Mainstem Channel & Deepening (NAP) 3-4, 3-20, 3-26 Depoe Bay, OR (NWP) 28-7, 28-31, 28-40 DeQueen Lake, AR (SWL) 37-6, 37-16, 37-29 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA (MVR) 15-5, 15-9, 15-13 Des Plaines River (LRC) 22-12, 22-19, 22-25 Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR (NWP) 28-21, 28-34, 28-44 Detroit River, MI (LRE) 21-9, 21-56, 21-75, 21-91, 21-95 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (LRH) 25-5, 25-16, 25-22 Dickson City (Olyphant) PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-30, 4-38 Dierks Lake, AR (SWL) 37-6, 37-17, 37-29 Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK (POA) 32-6, 32-12, 32-15 Dillingham Harbor, AK (POA) 32-2, 32-9, 32-13 Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-5, 25-17, 25-23 Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-36 Dorena Lake, OR (NWP) 28-13, 28-32, 28-42 Double Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-5, 40-25, 40-33, 40-55 Douglas Harbor, AK (POA) 32-3, 32-9, 32-13 Duck Creek, OH (LRL) 24-3, 24-16, 24-24 Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI (LRE) 21- 10, 21-56, 21-76, 21-92 Dunkirk Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-5, 20-15, 20-27, 20-40 Duval County, FL (SAJ) 9-23, 9-48, 9-73 Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID (NWW) 30-5, 30- 13, 30-17, 30-22, 30-24 E East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, (LRP) 18-8, 18-16, 18-21 East Brimfield Lake, MA (NAE) 1-27, 1-40 East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-6, 25-17, 25-23 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-36 East Rockaway Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-28, 2-33, 2-36 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN) 2-14, 2-26, 2- 32, 2-41 East Sidney, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (MVS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-13 Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-41, 9-55 Ecosystem Restoration Work Under Special Authorization (MVS) 14-6, (MVK) 12-8, (SAC) 7-9, (MVR) 15-7 Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (NAE) 1-23, 1-38 El Dorado Lake, KS (SWT) 38-5, 38-16, 38-24 El Paso, TX (SPA) 36-3, 36-13, 36-16 Elk City Lake, KS (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24, 38-28 Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NWP) 28-14, 28-32, 28-42 Elkins, WV (LRP) 18-4, 18-15, 18-20 Elmira, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 Emergency Bank Protection (NAP) 3-14 Emergency Flood Control Activities Norfolk District (NAO) 5-15, Tulsa District (SWF) 38-12 I-7 Emergency Response Activities (NWK) 27-10, Memphis District (MVM) 13-3, Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11, (SAC) 7-10 Emergency Shore Protection (LRE) 21-39 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization Galveston District (SWG) 40-21 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) (SWL) 37-3, 37-25 Enforcement (SAJ) 9-37 Environmental Activities Under Special Authorization (NWP) 28-26 Environmental Data Studies (SPA) 36-12 Environmental Improvement Work Under Special Authorization (NAP) 3-18 Erie Harbor, PA (LRB) 20-6, 20-16, 20-28, 20- 40 Eufaula Lake, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26, 38-28 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (NWS) 29-2, 29-16, 29-23, 29-34 Everglades South Florida Ecosystem Restoration (SAJ) 9-38, 9-52, 9-80 F Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-40 Fairport Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-6, 20-16, 20-29, 20-40 Fall Creek Lake, OR (NWP) 28-15, 28-32, 28- 43 Fall River Basin, SD (NWO) 26-5, 26-20, 26-27 Fall River Lake, KS (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24, 38-28 Falls Lake, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-23 Faulkner Island, CT (NAE) 1-21, 1-37, 1-49 Fern Ridge Lake, OR (NWP) 28-15, 28-32, 28-43 Fernandina Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-41, 9-56 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX (SWF) 39-6, 39-19, 39-24 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY (NAN) 2-14, 2-25, 2-28, 2-33 Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-15, 2- 26, 2-32 Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (LRH) 25-6, 25-17, 25-23 Fivemile River, CT (NAE) 1-7, 1-32, 1-45, 1-61 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Mobile District (SAM) 10-25 Omaha District (NWO) 26-18 Portland District (NWP) 28-28 Savannah District (SAS) 8-10 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-13 Flood Control Reservoir Operations (NAE) 1-29 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (POA) 32-6 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Charleston District (SAC) 7-8, 7-22 Chicago District (LRC) 22-16 Detroit District (LRE) 21-45 Galveston District (SWG) 40-21 Honolulu District (POH) 31-3 Huntington District (LRH) 25-13 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-9 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (LRL) 24-14, 24-39 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-21, 10- 46 Nashville District (LRN) 23-7, 23-19 New England Division (NAE) 1-29 New Orleans District (MVN) 11-9, 11-29 New York District (NAN) 2-23 Omaha District (NWO) 26-10 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Portland District (NWP) 28-18 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-8, 15-21 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-30 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-10 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 St. Louis District (MVS) 14-6, 14-21 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12, 38-30 Vicksburg District (MVK) 12-8 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15, 6-32 Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-36 Folly River, SC (SAC) 7-4, 7-11, 7-17 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) (MVS) 14-7, 14-10 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26, 38-28 Fort Myers Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-42, 9-56 9 86 I-8 Fort Peck Lake, MT (NWO) 26-14, 26-24, 26-30 Fort Pierce Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-24, 9-48, 9-73 Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-42, 9-57 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD (NWO) 26-15, 26-24, 26-30 Fort Supply Lake, OK (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38- 24 Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN (LRE) 21-42, 21-70, 21-86 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-32 Four River Basins, FL (SAJ) 9-33, 9-50, 9-78, 9-84, 9-95, 9-96 Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 37-6, 37-17 Fox River, WI (LRE) 21-11, 21-57, 21-76, 21- 96 Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-23, 3-31 Frankfort Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-12, 21-57, 21-77 Franklin Falls Dam, NH (NAE) 1-24, 1-38 Freeport Harbor, TX (SWG) 40-5, 4-25, 40-33, 40-52, 40-55, 40-61 Friday Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-3, 29-16, 29-23 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24 G Galilee Salt Marsh, RI (NAE) 1-21, 1-37, 1-49 Galisteo Dam, NM (SPA) 36-6, 36-14, 36-18 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (SWG) 40-6, 40-25, 40-35, 4-52, 40-56, 40-61 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (NWO) 26-15, 26-25, 26-30 Garrison Dam Major Rehabilitation, Lake Sakakawea, ND (NWO) 26-15 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (NAO) 5-15 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD (NWO) 26-16, 26-25, 26-30, 26-35 General Investigations (NWK) 27-10, (NWO) 26-18, (NPO) 5-12 (NAO) 5-15 General Regulatory Functions (NWO) 26-18, (NWS) 29-15, (MVR) 15-7, (MVK) 12-8, (MVM)1 3-3, (MVS) 14-6, (MVN) 11-11, (SAC) 7-10, (SAS) 8-10 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-23, 3-31 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-5, 10-27 Georgetown Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-4, 7-12, 7-17 Gillham Lake, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-17, 37-29 Glen Cove, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-25, 2-28 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA (NAE) 1-7, 1-32, 1-45 Goldsborough Creek, WA (NWS) 29-12, 29-20, 29-27, 29-35 Grafton Park River, ND (MVP) 16-5, 16-15, 16- 19, 16-34 Grand Forks, ND - East Grand Forks, MN 16- 5, 16-15, 16-19 Grand Haven Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-12, 21-57, 21-77, 21-92 Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (MVN) 11-5, 11-13, 11-17 Grand Traverse Bay Harobor, MI (LRE) 21-13, 21-58, 21-77 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (NWS) 29-3, 29-16, 29-23, 29-34 Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA (NWS) 29- 14, 29-17, 29-23 Grayson Lake, KY (LRH) 25-6, 25-17, 25-23 Great Bend, KS (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-24, 38- 29 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-13, 3-23, 3-31 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK (SWT) 38-6, 38-17, 38-25 Great Salt Pond, Black Island, RI (NAE) 1-7, 1- 33,1-45 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-6, 20- 16, 20-29, 20-40 Green and Barren Rivers, KY (LRL) 24-2, 24-16, 24-22, 24-31, 24-35 Green Bay Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-14, 21-58, 21-77 Green Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-8, 1-33, 1-45, 1-61 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR (NWP) 28-21, 28-34, 28-44 Green River Lake, KY (LRL) 24-9, 24-19 Greens Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-17 Greers Ferry Lake, AR (SWL) 37-11, 37-19, 37-29 Greiliekville Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-15, 21-58, 21-78 I-9 Guadalupe River, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-40 Guilford Creek, VA (NAO) 5-6 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border (SAM) 10-12, 10-29, 10-36 (MVN) 11-13 (SWG) 40-7, 40-25, 40-36, 40-52, 40- 61 Gulf of Mexico, Highway 193 Mobile County, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-30, 10-40 Gulfport Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-12, 10-29, 10-37 Gulfside Seawall, Waveland, MS (SAM) 10-18, 10-30, 10-40 H Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ (NAN) 2-19, 2- 27, 2-34 Halls Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-17 Halstead, KS (SWT) 38-7, 38-17, 38-25, 38-29 Hamilton County, TN (LRN) 23-5, 23-10 Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) (NAO) 5-6 Hancock Brook Lake, CT (NAE) 1-22, 1-38 Hansen Dam, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-22 Harbor Beach Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-15, 21-58, 21-78 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NAE) 1-8, 1-33, 1-46 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE (NWK) 27-3, 27-13, 27-16, 27-30 Harrisville Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-15, 21-59, 21-78 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO (NWK) 27-8, 27-15, 27-20, 27-30 Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-19, 8-22 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK (SWT) 38-7, 38-18, 38-25 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-40 Hidden Lake/Great Marsh, NE (NWO) 26-12, 26-23, 26-29, 26-47 Hills Creek Lake, OR (NWP) 28-22, 28-34, 28-45 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS (NWK) 27-4, 27-13, 27-16, 27-30 Hodges Village Dam, MA (NAE) 1-27, 1-40 Holes Creek, Ohio (LRL) 24-3, 24-16, 24-24 Holland Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-16, 21-59, 21- 78, 21-92 Homer Harbor, AK (POA) 32-3, 32-10, 32-13 Homer Spit Erosion, AK (POA) 32-6, 32-12, 32-16 Homme Lake and Dam, ND (MVP) 16-6, 16-16, 16-19 Honga River and Tar Bay, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-27, 4-35 Hop Brook Lake, CT (NAE) 1-22, 1-38 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH (NAE) 1-24, 1-39 Hords Creek Lake, TX (SWF) 39-6, 39-16, 39- 19, 39-25 Hornell, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-31 Housatonic River, CT (NAE) 1-21 Houston, MN (MVP) 16-6, 16-16, 16-20 Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX (SWG) 40-9, 40-26, 40-39, 40-62 Houston Ship Channel, TX (SWGO) 40-10, 40- 26, 40-39, 40-52, 40-56, 40-62 Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (NWS) 29-8, 29- 18, 29-25 Hudson River at Athens, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-25, 2-29, 2-33 Hudson River, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-25, 2-28, 2-33, 2-35, 2-36 Hugo Lake, OK (SWT) 38-7, 38-18, 38-25 Hulah Lake, OK (SWT) 38-7, 38-18, 38-25 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA (SPN) 34-2, 34- 15, 34-24 Hunting Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-17 Huron Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-7, 20-16, 20-30, 20-40 Hurricane Barrier Operations New England Division (NAE) 1-29 Hyannis Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-8, 1-33, 1-46 I Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea, WA (NWW) 30-6, 30-13, 30-18, 30-24, 30-29 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, (MVR) IL 15-2, 15-9 Illinois Beach State Park, IL (LRC) 22-10, 22 19, 22-24 Illinois Waterway, IL (MVS) 14-2 1 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (MVR) 15-2, 15-9, 15-11, 15-18, 15-23 I-10 Indian River County, FL (SAJ) 9-24, 9-48, 9- 73 Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (NAP) 3-5, 3-21, 3-27 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN (LRC) 22-11, 22-19, 22-24 Indiana Harbor, IN (LRC) 22-6, 22-18, 22-22, 22-27 Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (LRC) 22-11, 22-19, 22-25 Inland Route, MI (LRE) 21-16, 21-59, 21-78 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, MD, (NAP) 3-6, 3-21, 3-27 Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE (NAP) 3-7, 3-21, 3-28 Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA (MVN) 11-2, 11-13 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects (NAE) 1-15 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Alaska District (POA) 32-6 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-10 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Detroit District (LRE) 21-45 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 39-14, 39-29 Galveston District (SWG) 40-21 Honolulu District (POH) 31-2 Huntington District (LRH) 25-13, 25-25 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Kansas City District (NWK) 27-8, 27-15 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-9 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (LRL) 24-14, 24-36 Mobile District (SAM) 10-21 Nashville District (LRN) 23-7 New England Division (NAE) 1-28 New Orleans District (MVN) 11-9 New York District (NAN) 2-23 Omaha District (NWO) 26-10, 26-22 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Portland District (NWP) 28-18 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-7, 15-16, 15-20 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-30 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-10, 34- 26 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7, 8-12 Seattle District (NWS) 29-8 St. Louis District (MVS) 14-6 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-13 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12, 38-29 Vicksburg District (MVK) 12-8 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15 Inspection of Completed Works (SAC) 7-7, (MVM) 13-2 Inspection of Non-Federal Levees (NAP) 3-15 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-42, 9- 57 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-42, 9-58 Irondequoit Bay, NY (LRB) 20-7, 20-16, 20-30 Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (SPK) 35-12, 35-41 J J. Edward Roush Lake, IN (LRL) 24-10, 24-19 J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (LRN) 23-8, 23-10 J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-8, 8-13, 8-19, 8-22 Jackson Hole, WY (NWW) 30-2, 30-13 Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-28, 10-35 Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-43, 9-59 Jacksonville Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-42, 9-58 Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-25, 2-29, 2-33, 2-36 James River, VA (NAO) 5-7 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (SWL) 37-3, 37-26 Jemez Canyon Dam, NM (SPA) 36-6, 36-14 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV (NAB) 4-11, 4-29, 4-38 Jim Chapman Lake, TX (SWF) 39-7, 39-19, 39-25 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA (SAM) 10-23, 10-31, 10-42 Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3), AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-25 Joe Pool Lake, TX (SWF) 39-7, 39-20, 39-25 1-11 John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA (NWP) 28-22, 28-34, 28-45, 28- 58 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA and NC (SAW) 6-16, 6-24 John Martin Reservoir, CO (SPA) 36-3, 36-14 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS (SWT) 38-7, 38-18, 38-25 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA (LRH) 25-6, 25-17, 25-23 John's Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-43, 9-59, 9-86 Johnstown, PA (LRP) 18-4, 18-15, 18-20 Jones Creek, VA (NAO) 5-7 Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront and Historic Area, NJ (NAN) 2-19, 2-27, 2-34 K Kake Harbor, AK (POA) 32-3, 32-10, 32-13, 32-17 Kanawha River, WV (LRH) 25-2, 25-15, 25-22 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS (NWK) 27-4, 27-13, 27-16 Kaskaskia River, IL (MVS) 14-2, 14-11, 14-16 Kaw Lake, OK (SWT) 38-8, 38-18, 38-25 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-41, 35-48 Kennebunk River, NH (NAE) 1-9, 1-33, 1-46, 1-61 Kenosha Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-17, 21-60, 21-78, 21-93 Kentucky Lock (LRN) 23-3, 23-10 Kentucky River, KY (LRL) 24-2, 24-16, 24-35 Kewaunee Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-18, 21-60, 21-79 Keweenaw Waterway, MI (LRE) 21-18, 21-60, 21-79 Keystone Lake, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kaui, Hawaii(POH) 31-2, 31-5, 31-6 Kill Van Kull Newark Bay, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-25, 2-29, 2-33 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY, (LRP) 18-8, 18-16, 18-21 Kissimmee River Restoration (SAJ) 9-37, 9-79 Knapps Narrow, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-27, 4-35 Knightville Dam, MA (NAE) 1-19, 1-36 L LA-LB Harbor (LA Harbor), CA (SPL) 33-2, 33- 13, 33-17, 33-27 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-19, 21-61, 21-79 Lackawanna River Basin, PA (NAB) 4-12, 4-29, 4-38 Lackawawnna River, Olyphant, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-29, 4-38 Lackawanna River, Scranton, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-30, 4-39 LaFarge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI (MVP) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 LaPointe Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-19, 21-60, 21- 79 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (MVP) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 Lake Elsinore, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-22 Lake Erie - Cooley Canal - Lucas, OH (LRB) 20-11, 20-19 Lake George, Hobart, IN (LRC) 22-12, 22-19, 22-25 Lake Kemp, TX (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 Lake Michigan Diversion (LRC) 22-7, 22-18, 22-23 Lake Montauk Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-8, 2-25, 2- 29, 2-36 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) (MVN) 11-6, 11-13, 11-17 Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge Project, LA (MVN) 11-7, 11-14, 11-17 Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels in (LRE) 21-19, 21-61, 21-80 Lake Texoma (Denison Dam) OK and TX (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26 Lake Washington Ship Channel, WA (NWS) 29-4, 29-17, 29-20, 29-24, 29-27 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane protection) (MVN) 11-8, 11-14, 11-18 Las Cruces, NM (SPA) 36-4, 36-14, 36-16 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (LR) 23-8 Lavon Lake, TX (SWF) 39-8, 39-20, 39-25 1-12 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 39-8, 39-20, 39-25 Lee County, FL (SAJ) 9-25, 9-48, 9-74 Leland Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-20, 21-61, 21-80 LeSueur River CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN (MVP) 16-8, 16-17, 16-20 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big SACdy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA (LRH) 25-7, 25-17, 25-23 Lewisville Dam, TX (SWF) 39-9, 39-20, 39-25 Lexington Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-20, 21-61, 21-80 Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT (NWS) 29-11, 29-20, 29-26 Lisle, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-31 Little Blue River Lakes, MO (NWK) 27-4, 27-13, 27-18 Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (LRC) 22-13, 22-20, 22-25 Little Calumet River, IN (LRC) 22-13, 22-19, 22-25 Little Dell Lake, UT, CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-41 Little Falls Dam Passage #2, MD (NAB) 4-23, 4-33, 4-40 Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan, WA (NWW) 30-7, 30-13, 30-18, 30-25, 30-29 Little Harbor, NH (NAE) 1-9, 1-33, 1-46 Little Lake Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-21, 21-62, 21-80 Little River Basin, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-29 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (SAC) 7-5, 7-12, 7-18 Little Sugar Creek Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, N.C. (CAP Section 206) (SAW) 6-19, 6-24 Little Sugar Creek Habitat Restoration, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) (SAW) 6-18, 6-24 Little White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-18 Little Wicomico River, VA (NAB) 4-5, 4-27, 4- 35 ittleville Lake, MA (NAE) 1-19, 1-36 Lock and Dam No. 5, AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-25 Lock Haven, PA (NAB) 4-12, 4-29, 4-38 Lock No. 2 and Wilber D. Mills Dam (No. 2), AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-25 Lockwoods Folly River, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-21 Logan Creek, Pender, NE (NWO) 26-6, 26-20, 26-27 Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO (NWK) 27-5, 27-13, 27-18 Long Road, Chehalis River, WA (NWS) 29-8, 29-18, 29-25, 29-35 Longboat Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-43, 9-59, 9- 86 Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR (NWP) 28-23, 28-35, 28-45 Lorain Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-7, 20-17, 20-30, 20-40 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-22 Los Angeles River Sepulveda to Arroyo Seca Recreation Development, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-23 Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River, OR (NWP) 28-24, 28-35, 28-45 Loves Park, IL (MVR) 15-5, 15-9, 15-13 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA (NWP) 28-15, 28-32, 28-43 Lower Decatur, NE (NWO) 26-12, 26-23, 26- 29, 26-47 Lower Girard Dam, OH (LRP) 18-9, 18-16 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (NWW) 30-7, 30-13, 30-18, 30-26, 30-29 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West, WA (NWW) 30-8, 30-13, 30-19, 30-27, 30-29 Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX (SWG) 40-19, 40-27, 40-46 Lower Savannah River Basin GA & SC (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-16 Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR and ID (NWW) 30-9, 30-14, 30-18 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-9, 18-16, 18-22 Lucky Peak Lake, ID (NWW) 30-3, 30-13 Ludington Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-21, 21-62, 21-80 Lynn Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-10, 1-34, 1-46, 1-61 Lynnhaven Inlet VA (NAO) 5-8 Maalaea Harbor, Maui, HI (POH) 31-2, 31-5, 31-6 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-9, 18-16, 18-22, 18-32 1-13 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR (SWL) 37-5 Mamaronek Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-8, 2-26, 2-29, 2-33, 2-36 Manasquan River, NJ (NAP) 3-7, 3-22, 3-29 Manatee County, FL (SAJ) 9-28, 9-48, 9-74 Manatee Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-43, 9-59 Manistee Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-22, 21-62, 21-80 Manistique Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-22, 21-63, 21-81 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-23, 21-63, 21-81, 21-93 Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT (NAE) 1-27, 1-40 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-21 Marina Del Rey, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-13, 33-19, 33-32 Marion Reservoir, KS (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 Marquette Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-24, 21-63, 21- 81 Marshall, MN (MVP) 16-8, 16-17, 16-22 Martin County, FL (SAJ) 9-26, 9-49, 9-75 Martins Fork Lake, KY (LRN) 23-6, 23-10 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA (SPK) 35-16, 35-41 Massillon, OH, (LRH) 25-7, 25-17, 25-23 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 40-11, 40-26, 40-40, 40-56, 40-63 Mayaguez Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-12, 9-44, 9-60 McClellan-Kerr Arnkansas River Navigation System, OK (SWT) 38-2, 38-15, 38-24 McCook and Thorton Reservoirs, IL (LRC) 22-14, 22-20, 22-25 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT) 38-8, 38-19, 38-25 McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA (NWW) 30-9, 30-14, 30-18, 30-27 Melbourne Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-12, 9-44, 9-60 Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS (NWK) 27-5, 27-13, 27-18, 27-26 Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI (LRE) 21-24, 21-63, 21-81 Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO (MVS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-13 Merced County Stream Group, CA (SPK) 35-18, 35-42, 35-58 Merced County Streams, CA (SPK) 35-17, 35-42 Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA (NAE) 1-23 Metlakatla Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 32-10, 32-14 , 32-19 Miami Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-12, 9-44, 9-60 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRP), 18-9, 18-16, 18-22, 18-24 Michigan City Harbor, IN (LRC) 22-8, 22-18, 22-23, 22-27 Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM (SPA) 36-7, 37-14, 36-17 Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY (LRN) 23-6, 23-10 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS (NWK) 27-5, 27-13, 27-18, 27-30 Milk River, Matta, MT (NWO) 26-6, 26-20, 26- 27 Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA (NWW) 30-3, 30-13, 30-17 Mill Creek, OH (LRL) 24-4, 24-16, 24-35 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-17 Miller Corner Phragmites Control, SC (SAC) 7- 10, 7-14, 7-20 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-23, 10-32, 10-47 Millwood Lake, AR (SWL) 37-7, 37-17, 37-29 Milwaukee Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-25, 21-64, 21- 82, 21-93 Mingo Creek, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-19, 38-25, 38-29 Miscellaneous Work Under Special Authorization San Francisco District (SPN) 34-11 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-10 Mississinewa Lake, IN (LRL) 24-10, 24-19 Mississippi River Between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (MVS) 14-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (MVR) 153 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (MVP) 16-2 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL (MVS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 2 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (MVN) 11"' 11-13, 11-15 1-14 Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development (NWK) 27-10, 27- 15 Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (MVN) 11-3, 11-13, 11-16 Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD (NWO) 26-6, 26-20, 26-27 Missouri River Basin Colloboration Effort (NWK) 27-10, 27-15 Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE (NWO) 26-16, 26-25, 26-31 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO (NWK) 27-2, 27-12, 27-16, (NWO) 26-13, 26- 24, 26-30, 26-47 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA (NWO) 26-7, 26-21, 26-27 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Kansas City District) (NWK) 27-6, 27-14, 27-18, 27-30 Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update (NWO) 26-17, 26-25, 26-31 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (NWO) 26-3, 26-19, 26-26, 26-38 (NWK) 27-2, 27-12, 27-16 Mitigation of Shore Damages Detroit District (LRE) 21-40 Mobile Harbor, AL (SAM) 10-13, 10-29, 10-37 Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-23 Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (NAP) 3-15, 3-23, 3-32 Monongahela River, PA and WV (LRP) 18-2, 18-15, 18-19, 18-30, 18-31, 18- 32 Monroe Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-26, 21-64, 21-82 Monroe Lake, IN (LRL) 24-11, 24-19 Moorefield, WV (NAB) 4-12, 4-29, Moravian 4-38 Creek, Wilkesboro, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-23 Morehead City Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-21 Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure (SWL) 37-14 Morro Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRP) 18-10, 18-16, 18-22, 18-24 Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River (LRB) 20-13, 20-19, 20-31 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (NWP) 28-16, 28-32, 28-43 Mud Mountain Dam, WA (NWS) 29-9, 29-19, 29-25 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power (SAC) 7-9 Murderkill River, DE (NAP) 3-7, 3-21, 3-28 Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-25 Murrells Inlet, SC (SAC) 7-5, 7-12, 7-18 Muscatine Island, IA (MVR) 15-7, 15-10, 15- 14 Muskegon Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-26, 21-64, 21-82 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (LRH) 25-8, 25-18, 25-24, 25-26 Myrtle Beach, SC (SAC) 7-7, 7-13, 7-20, 7-27 N Nandua Creek (NAO) 5-8 Nanticoke River, DE & MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-27, 4- 35 Napa River, CA (SPK) 35-18 Narrows & Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-9, 2- 25, 2-29, 2-33 Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-26, 9-49, 9-75 Nathan's Lake (NOW) 26-13, 26-24, 26-30, 26-47 National Emergency Preparedness Buffalo District (LRB) 20-13 Chicago District (LRC) 22-9 Mobile District (SAM) 10-25 Omaha District (NWO) 26-18 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 St. Paul 16-13 Seattle District (NWS) 29-15 Naugatuck River, Torrington, CT (NAE) 1-22, 1-38, 1-49 Navarro Mills Lake, TX (SWF) 39-9, 39-20, 39- 25 Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period (SAJ) 9-22 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-9 Charleston District (SAC) 7-6 1-15 Detroit District (LRE) 21-38 Galveston District (SWG) 40-15 Honolulu District (POH) 31-2 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-22 Louisville District (LRL) 24-3 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-5 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-45 Nashville District (LRN) 23-4 New Orleans District (MVN) 11-4 New York District (NAN) 2-14 Omaha District (NWO) 26-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Portland District (NWP) 28-12 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-7 Savannah District (SAS) 8-5 St. Louis District (MVS) 14-3 Vicksburg District (MVK) 12-3 Neabsco Creek, MD (NAB) 4-13, 4-29, 4-38 Neal Sound, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-27, 4-35 Neches River and Tributaries Saltwater Barrier at Beaumont, TX (SWG) 4-12, 40-26, 40-41, 40-52, 40- 57, 40-63 Neuse River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-35 New Bedford & Fairhaven Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-10, 1-34, 1-47, 1-61 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NAE) 1-24, 1-39 New Buffalo Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-27, 21-65, 21-82 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-21, 3-28 New Madrid County Harbor, MO (MVM) 13-1, 13-4 New Melones Lake, CA (SPK) 35-31 New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane protection) (MVN) 11-7, 11-14, 11-18 New Pass, Sarasota, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-44, 9-62 New York and New Jersey Channels (NAN) 2- 11, 2-26, 2-31 New York City Watershed, NY (NAN) 2-20, 2- 27, 2-34 New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels (Port Jersey) (NAN) 2-9, 2-26, 2-29 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-10, 2-26, 2-30 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-10, 2-26, 2-30 New York State Canal System (LRB) 20-12, 20-19, 20-31 Newark, OH (LRH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-18, 25-24, 25-30 Newport Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19, 33-27, 33-32 Newport News Creek, VA (NAO) 5-8 Nimrod Lake, AR (SWL) 37-8, 37-17, 37-28 Nimrod Fisheries Restoration (SWL) 37-14 Ninilchik Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 32-10, 32-14 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (NWO) 26-7, 26-21, 26-27 Nogales Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-23 Nolin Lake, KY (LRL) 24-11, 24-19 Norco Bluffs, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-23 Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA (NAO) 5-8 Norfolk Lake, AR (SWL) 37-11, 37-19, 37-29 Norrel Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR (SWL) 37-4, 37-25 North Branch, Chicago River, IL (LRC) 22-14, 22-20, 22-25 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH (LRH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-18, 25-24 North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA (LRH) 25-9, 25-18, 25-24 North Hartland Lake, VT (NAE) 1-19, 1-37 North Nashua River, Lancaster, PA (NAE) 1- 24, 1-39, 1-49 North Springfield Lake, VT (NAE) 1-29, 1-37 Northeast River, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-27, 4-36 Northfield Brook Lake, CT (NAE) 1-22, 1-38 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL (MVS) 14-5, 14-14, 14-18, 14-23 O O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 39-9, 39-20, 39-26 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND (NWO) 26-16, 26-25, 26-30, 26-36 Oak Orchard, NY (LRB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-32 Oakland Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-3, 34-15, 34-22 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-6, 4-27, 4-36 Oceanside Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19, 33-32 Oceanside Harbor Sand By-Pass, CA (SPL) 33" 4, 33-13, 33-19 1-16 Oconto Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-27, 21-65, 21-83 O'Hare Reservoir, IL (LRC) 22-15, 22-20, 22- 25 Ohio River Basin Huntington District (LRH) 25-9, 25-18 Louisville District (LRL) 24-11, 24-19, 24-22 Nashville District (LRN) 23-6, 23-13, 23- 18 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-10, 18-16, 18-22, 18-24, 18-32 Ohio River Flood Protection (LRL) 24-4, 24-16 Okatibbee Lake, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-31, 10- 40 Okeechobee Waterway, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-44, 9-62, 9-88 Oklawaha River, FL (SAJ) 9-14, 9-44, 9-62 Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-28, 10-35 Olympia Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-5, 29-17, 29-24 Onandaga Storm Water Discharge (LRB) 20-13, 20-20 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-28, 21-65, 21-83, 21-93 Oologah Lake, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-19, 38-25, 38-28 Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY (LRL) 24-2, 24-16 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (LRH) 25-3, (ORD) 19-4, 19-5, 19-6 (LRP) 18- 3, (LRL) 24-3 Optima Lake, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-20, 38-25 Oswego Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-8, 20-17, 20-31, 20-41 Other Aquatic Habitat (Sec. 204) (SAM) 10-25 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Chicago District (LRC) 22-11, 22- 28 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-30 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10- 43 New York District (NAN) 2-19 Other Authorized Bridge Alterations (LRC) 22-9, 22-28 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Albuquerque District (SPA) 36- 11, 36-18 Charleston District (SAC) 7-8, 7- 22 Chicago District (LRC) 22-16, 22- 28 Detroit District (LRE) 21-45 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-14, 39-29 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-9, 37-23 Louisville District (LRL) 24-14, 24-27 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10-21, 10-44 New York Division (NAN) 2-23 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-13 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-7, 15-21 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7, 8- 21 Seattle District (NWS) 29-10 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12 Other Authorized Navigation Projects Charleston District (SAC) 7-6 Detroit District (LRE) 21-38 Huntington District (LRH) 25-3, 25-26 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-22 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-5, 37-22 Louisville District (LRL) 24-3, 24- 26 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17, 10- 43 New York District (NAN) 2-14 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-4 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-4, 15-17 Savannah District (SAS) 8-5, 8- 30 Seattle District (NWS) 29-17 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-2 Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects Charleston District (SAC) 7-7, 7- 21 Other Programs and Activities (MVS) 14-6 (SAS) 8-10 Other Work Under Special Authority Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-13 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-34 Otter Brook Lake, NH (NAE) 1-20, 1-37 1-17 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (MVK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA (MVK) 12-5, 12-12 Ouachita River Levees, LA (MVK) 12-4, 12-10, 12-18 Owasco Outlet, Auburn, NY (LRB) 20-9, 20- 17, 20-33 Oxford, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-31 Oyster Channel, VA (NAO) 5-10 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), AR (SWL) 37-12, 37-19, 37-26 P Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-10, 25-19, 25-24 Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-23 Paintsville Lake, KY (LRH) 25-10, 25-19, 25- 24 Pajaro River, CA (SPK) 35-19, 35-42 Palm Beach County, FL (SAJ) 9-27, 9-49, 9-75 Palm Beach Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-45, 9-63 Palm Beach Island, FL (SAJ) 9-28, 9-49, 4-75 Palm Valley Bridge, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-45, 9-63 Panama City Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-13, 10-29, 10-38 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE (NWO) 26-7, 26-21, 26-27 Parker Creek, VA (NAO) 5-10 Parker Lake, OK (SWT) 38-9, 38-20, 38-25 Pascagoula Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-38 Passaic River Basin, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-20, 2- 27, 2-34 Pat Mayse Lake, TX (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Patchogue River, CT (NAE) 1-7, 1-25 Patoka Lake, IN (LRL) 24-11, 24-20 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA (MVK) 12-5, 12- 10, 12-13 Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA (MVK) 12-6, 12-10, 12-13 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS (SWT) 38- 10, 38-20, 38-25 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (NWO) 26-7, 26-21, 26-27 Pensacola Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10- 39 Pentwater Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-28, 21-65, 21-83, 21-93 Perdido Pass Channel, AL (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10-39 Permit Evaluation (SAJ) 9-37 Perry Creek, IA (NWO) 26-8, 26-21, 26-27, 26- 29 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS (NWK) 27-6, 27-14, 27-18, 27-30 Petaluma River, Petaluma, CA (SPN) 34-8, 34- 15, 34-24 Petersburg, WV (NAB) 4-13, 4-30, 4-39 Petoskey Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-29, 21-65, 21- * 83 Philpott Lake, VA (SAW) 6-16, 6-24 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City District) (NWK) 27-6, 27-18 Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) (NWO), 26-8, 26-28, 26-39 Pierre, SD (NWO) 26-17, 26-25, 26-31 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-24 Pine Bluff Wetland Restoration, AR (SWL) 37- 15 Pine Creek Lake, TX (SWT) 38-10, 38-19, 38- 42 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (SPK) 35-19, 35-42 Pinellas County, FL (SAJ) 9-28, 9-49, 9-76 Pipestem Lake, ND (NWO) 26-8, 26-22, 26-28 Planning, Engineering and Design (NAE) 1-30 Plymouth Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-10, 1-34, 1-47 Point Beach, Milford, CT (NAE) 1-15, 1-35, 1- 48 Point Lookout Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-29, 21-66, 21-83 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO (NWK) 27-6, 27-14, 27-19, 27-30 Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS (NWK) 27-7, 27-14, 27-19, 27-30 Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-45,9-64 Ponce Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-16, 9-45, 9-64, 9-86 Pond Creek, KY (LRL) 24-4, 24-16, 24-24 Pool 8 Pilot Drawd Own, WI (MVP) 16-9, 16- 17, 16-20 Poplar Island, MD (NAB) 4-24, 4-33, 4-40 1-18 Port Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-45, 9-64 Port Fourchon, LA (MVN) 11-3, 11-13, 11-16 Port Hueneme, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-19, 30-32 Port of Long Beach, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33- 19 Port Orford, OR (NWP) 28-8, 28-31, 28-40 Port Royal Harbor, SC (SAC) 7-5, 7-12, 7-19 Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-29, 21-66, 21-83 Port Washington Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-30, 21-66, 21-83 Port Wing Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-30, 21-67, 21- 84 Portage Lake Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-31, 21-67, 21-84 Portage, WI (MVP) 16-10, 16-17, 16-20 Porter Levee, WA (NWS) 29-12, 29-20, 29-27 Portland Harbor, ME (NAE) 1-11, 1-34 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, NH & ME (NAE) 1-11, 1-34 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (SAJ) 9-34, 9-51, 9-78 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-7, 4-28, 4-36 Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC (NAB) 4-7, 4-27, 4-36 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA (NAB) 4-7, 4- 28, 4-36 Potomac River below Washington, DC (NAB) 4- 7, 4-28, 4-36 Preconstruction Engineering and Design - See Advance Engineering and Design Preservation of Natural Flood Storage, Passaic River, NJ (NAN) 2-21, 2-27, 2-34 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (LRB) 20-12, 20-19, 20-33 Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-28, 4-36 Proctor Lake, TX (SWF) 39-10, 39-21, 39-26 Project Condition Surveys Portland District (NWP) 28-12 Seattle District (NWS) 29-5 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (SAS) 8-7 (SWG) 40-22 (LRE) 21-41, (SAM) 10-25, (LRP) 18-14 Prompton Lake, PA (NAP) 3-16, 3-24, 3-32 Protection of Navigation (MVN) 11-10 Providence River and Harbor, RI (NAE) 1-12, 1-34, 1-47, 1-62 Puget Creek, WA (NWS) 29-13, 29-20, 29-27 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA (NWS) 29-5, 29-17, 29-24 Punxsatawney, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-5, 18-15, 18-20 Put-In-Bay Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-9, 20-17, 20- 33, 20-44 Q Quillayute River, WA (NWS) 29-5, 29-17, 29-24 Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (NAE) 1-25, 1-39, 1-49 R R.D. Bailey Lake, WV (LRH) 25-10, 25-19, 25-24 Rampano at Oakland, NJ (NAN) 2-21, 2-27, 2- 34 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ (NAN) 2-17, 2-26, 2-32 Raritan River, NY (NAN) 2-12, 2-26, 2-31 Raritan River Basin, Greenbook Sub-Basin, NJ (NAN) 2-22, 2-27, 2-34 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, NJ (NAN) 2-13, 2-26, 2-31, 2-37 Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA (NWK) 27-7, 27-14, 27-20 Ray Roberts Lake, TX (SWF) 39-10, 39-21, 39- 26 Raymondville Drain, TX (SWG) 40-20 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-30, 4-39 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Baltimore District (NAB) 4-9 Buffalo District (LRB) 20-11 Charleston District (SAC) 7-6 Chicago District (LRC) 22-9 Detroit District (LRE) 21-38 Galveston District (SWG) 40-15 Honolulu District (POH) 31-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17 New York District (NAN) 2-14 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 1-19 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-7 Savannah District (SAS) 8-5 Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK (SWT) 38-4, 38-15, 38-24 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabiliation (Vicksburg District) (MVK) 12-7, 12-14, 21- 19 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (MVK) 12-7, 12-10, 12-14, 12-19, 12-20 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (MVK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River of the North, Fargo Public Facilities, ND (MVP) 16-10, 16-17, 16-20, 16-30 Red River-Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (MVK) 12-3, 12-9, 12-11, 12-16, 12-20 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA (MVR) 15-5, 15-10, 15-13 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (SPK) 35- 21, 35-42 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-20, 33-27 Regulatory Functions Program Buffalo, NY (LRB) 20-13 Mobile District (SAM) 10-25 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-13 Regulatory Programs (NWK) 27-11, (NAB) 4-25 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida, (SAJ) 9-17, 9-46, 9-65, 9-89 Research and Development Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-14 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-33 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN (MVP) 16-2, 16-15, 16-19, 16-28 Restoration Work Under Special Authorization (SAJ) 9-39 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-19, 8-22 Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA (SPN) 34-4, 34-16, 34-23 Rillitoo River, AZ (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-24 Rio De La Plata, PR (SAJ) 9-34, 9-51, 9-78 Rio Grande De Arecibo, PR (SAJ) 9-35, 9-51, 9-78 Rio Grande Floodway, NM (SPA) 36-7, 36-15, 36-17, 36-18 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (SAJ) 9-35, 9-51, 9-79 Rio Salado, Phoenix Reach, AZ (SPL) 33-12 Rio Salado, Tempe Reach, AZ (SPL) 33-12 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds (SAS) 8-10, (SAM) 10-26 Roanoke River Basin, VA and NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-35 Roanoke River Upper Basin, VA Headwaters Area (SAW) 6-14, 6-23 Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (SWF) 39-14 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-23, 10-32, 10-47 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (SWT) 38-13, 38-22, 38-26 Rochester Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-9, 20-17, 20-33, 20-44 Rochester Harbor, NY (Wave Surge) (LRB) 20- 12, 20-19 Rochester, MN (MVP) 16-11, 16-17, 16-20 Rockaway Beach at Lake Taneycomo Aquatic Habitat Restoration, MO (SWL) 37-14 Rocky River, OH (LRB) 20-9, 20-18, 20-34 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR (NWP) 28-8, 28-31, 28-40 Rollinson Channel, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-22, 6-34 Roseville, OH (LRH) 25-11, 25-19, 25-24, 25- 30 Rouge River, MI (LRE) 21-31, 21-67, 21-84, 21-93 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY (LRL) 24-12, 24-20 Roughans Point, Revere, MA (NAE) 1-25, 1-39, 1-49 Rudee Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-11 Russian River Basin including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA (SPK) 35-22, 35-43, 35-50, (SPN) 34-9, 34-17, 34-24, 34-27 I-20 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (SWG) 40-12, 40-26, 40-41, 40-52, 40-57, 40- 63 Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas Point National Wildlife Refuge, TX (SWG) 40-22, 40-28 Sacramento River and Tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, CA (SPK) 35-23, 35-43, 35-50, 35-60 Sacramento River, CA 35-2, 35-38, 35-49 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-38 Sag Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-26, 2-31, 2-37, 2-41 Saginaw River, MI (LRE) 21-32, 21-67, 21-71, 21-84, 21-87, 21-93 Salamonie Lake, IN (LRL) 24-12, 24-20 Salem Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-12, 1-34, 1-47, 1- 62, 1-72 Salem River, NJ (NAP) 3-9, 3-22, 3-28 Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (NWO) 26-9, 26-22, 26-29 Salyersville, KY (LRL) 24-5, 24-17, 24-24 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (Dam Safety) (SWF) 39-13, 39-21 Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA (NWS) 29-13, 29-20, 29-27 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM (SPA) 36-8, 36-15 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 39-11, 39-21, 39-26 San Diego Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-14, 33-20, 30-32 San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-21, 33-32 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA (SPN) 34-6, 34-17 San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA (SPN) 34-6, 34-17 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPN) 34-4, 34-17 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels), CA (SPK) 35-4, 35-38 San Gabriel River, TX (SWF) 39-11, 39-22, 39- 26 San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-4, 35-38, 35- 58 San Juan Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-19, 9-46, 9-66 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-25, 38-43 San Luis Rey River, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-25 San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA (SPN) 34-10, 34-18, 34-24 Sandusky Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-10, 20-18, 20-34 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAN) 2-18, 2-26, 2-34 Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-25, 33- 31 Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-24 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-21, 33-32 Santa Monica Breakwater, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33- 14, 33-21 Santa Paula Creek, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-25 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM (SPA) 36-8, 36-15 Sarasota County, FL (SAJ) 9-29, 9-50, 9-75 Sardis Lake, OK (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI (LRE) 21-34, 21-68, 21-85 Saugus River, MA (NAE) 1-13, 1-35, 1-48 Savannah Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-16 Savannah River Below Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-5, 8-11, 8-18 Saw Mill Run, PA (LRP) 18-5, 18-15, 18-21 Saxon Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-34, 21-68, 21-85 Saylorville Lake, IA (MVR) 15-6, 15-10, 15-13 Scappoose Drainage District, OR (NWP) 28-17, 28-32, 28-43 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-10 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-14 Kansas City District (NWK) 27-8, 27-14 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Mobile District (SAM) 10-25 Omaha District (NWO) 26-10, 26-23 Portland District (NWP) 28-18 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-31 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-11 1-21 Seattle District (NWS) 29-9 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-12 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-4 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-16 Schuylkill River, PA (NAP) 3-10, 3-22, 3-29, 3- 33 Schuylkill River Park, Philadelphia, PA (NAP) 3-16, 3-24, 3-32 Sea Turtle Habitat Restoration, Oar Island, NC (CAP Section 1135) (SAW) 6-19, 6-24 Seattle Harbor, WA (NWS) 29-6, 29-18, 29-24 Sebewaing River, MI (LRE) 21-35, 21-45, 21- 68, 21-71, 21-85, 21-87 Seekonk River, RI (NAE) 1-13, 1-35, 1-48 Sepulveda Dam, CA (Recreation Development) (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-23 Sesuit Harbor, MA (NAE) 1-3, 1-35, 1-48, 1-72 Shallow Creek, Baltimore, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4- 28, 4-36 Sheboygan Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-35, 21-68, 21-85 Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH (LRP) 18-10, 18-17, 18- 23, 18-25 Sheyenne River, ND (MVP) 16-11, 16-17, 16- 20 Shipyard River, SC (SAC) 7-6, 7-12, 7-19 Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, Myrtle Beach, SC (SAC) 7-8, 7-13, 7-20 Shore Protection Projection Under Special Authority Baltimore District (NAB) 4-10 Charleston District (SAC) 7-7 Portland District (NWP) 28-12 Seattle District (NWS) 29-7 Silver Lake Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-22, 6-29, 6-34 Simmon Field Control Structure (MVM) 13-2, 13-4 Sims Bayou, TX (SWG) 40-20, 40-27, 40-46 Sitka Harbor, AK (POA) 32-4, 32-10, 32-14, 32-17 Siuslaw River, OR (NWP) 28-8, 28-31, 28-40 Skiatook Lake, OK (SWT) 38-10, 38-20, 38-25 Skipanon Channel, OR (NWP) 28-9, 28-31, 28-41 Slack Water Harbor, Russellville, AR (SWL) 37-16 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO (NWK) 27-7, 27-14, 27-20 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID (NWW) 30-10, 30-14, 30-19 Somerville Lake, TX (SWF) 39-12, 39-22, 39- 27 Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project (SPN) 34-5, 34-18, 34-23 Souris River Basin, ND (MVP) 16-12, 16-18, 16-21 South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement, PA (NAP) 3-17, 3- 24, 3-32 (NAB) 4-24, 4-33, 4-40 South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Restoration (LRP) 18-5, 18-15, 18-21, (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4-39 South Haven Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-36, 21-69, 21-86 South Main Channel, TX (SWG) 40-20 South Platte River Basin, CO (NWO) 26-9, 26- 29 Southeast Louisiana Urban Drainage Project (MVN) 11-8, 11-14, 11-18 Southeastern Pennsylvania, PA (NAP) 3-17, 3- 24, 3-32 Southern and Eastern, KY (LRL) 24-5, 24-17 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-15, 4-39 Southern West Virginia (LRH) 25-11, 25-19, 25-24 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY (LRL) 24-5, 24-17 Spadra Creek, Clarksville, AR (SWL) 37-14 St. Augustine Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-46, 9- 65 St. Clair River, MI (LRE) 21-33, 21-67, 21-84, 21-93, 21-95 St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN (MVP) 16-12, 16-18, 16-21 St. Genevieve, MO (MVS) 14-5, 14-10, 14-14 St. George, AK (POA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-15 St. John River Basin, ME (NAE) 1-26, 1-39, 1- 50 St. Johns County, FL (SAJ) 9-29, 9-49, 9-76 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-46, 9-65 St. Joseph Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-33, 21-67, 21-85 1-22 St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL (MVS) 14-3, 14-12, 14-23 St. Lucie Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-46, 9-66 St. Marys River, MI (LRE) 21-49, 21-71, 21-87, 21-94 St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (POA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-15 Stamford, CT (NAE) 1-26, 1-39 Stillaguamish River, WA (NWS) 29-9, 29-19, 29-25, 29-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX (SWF) 39-12, 39- 22, 39-27 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-32, 4-39 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO (NWK) 27-8, 27-15, 27-21, 27-30 Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRP) 18-11, 18-17, 18-23, 18-25 Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization (SAC) 7-8 Studies (SAJ) 9-37 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI (LRE) 21-36, 21-69, 21-86 Sturgeon Point, NY (LRB) 20-10, 20-18, 20-34 Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-11, 25-19, 25-25 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-13, 2-26, 2-35 Supervisor of Norfolk Harbor (Prevention of Obstructive & Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-11 Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-21 Surry Mountain Lake, NH (NAE) 1-20, 1-37 Surveillance of Northern Waters and International Water Studies (LRE) 21-46 Surveys Alaska District (POA) 32-6 Albuquerque District (SPA) 36-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-25 Chicago District (LRC) 22-16 Detroit District (LRE) 21-51 Fort Worth District (SWF) 39-16 Galveston District (SWG) 40-22 Honolulu District (POH) 31-3 Huntington District (LRH) 25-14 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-36 Little Rock District (SWL) 37-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville District (LRL) 24-15, 24-41 Mobile District (SAM) 10-26 Nashville District (LRN) 23-9 New England Division (NAE) 1-30 New York District (NAN) 2-24 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-19 Pittsburgh District (LRP) 18-14 Portland District (NWP) 28-27 Rock Island District (MVR) 15-8 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-32 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-11 Savannah District (SAS) 8-9 Seattle District (NWS) 29-14 St. Paul District (MVP) 16-14 Tulsa District (SWT) 38-14 Walla Walla District (NWW) 30-11 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-20 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-40 Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (LRH) 25-11, 25-20, 25-25 Sweetwater River, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-15, 33-25 Swinomish Channel, WA (NWS) 29-6, 29-18, 29-25 T Table Rock Lake, MO (SWL) 37-12, 37-19, 37- 29 Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (NWS) 29-10, 29- 19, 29-26 Tampa Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-47, 9-68 Tangier Island, VA (NAO) 5-11 Taylorsville Lake, KY (LRL) 24-3, 24-20 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWT) 38-14, 38-23, 38-26 Tennessee River, TN, AL & KY (LRN) 23-3, 23- 10, 23-12, 23-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway AL & MS (SAM) 10-15, 10-30, 10-39, 10- 50, (LRN) 23-4, 23-10, 23-13 Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS (SAM) 10-16, 10-30, 10-40 Texas City Channel, TX (SWG) 40-12, 40-26, 40-43, 40-53, 40-57 Texas Flat Road, Kiln, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-30, 10-40 I-23 Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA (NAE) 1-26, 1-53 The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lacke Celilo, WA and OR (NWP) 28-24, 28-35, 28-46, 28-59 Thimble Shoals Channel, VA (NAO) 5-12 Thomaston Dam, CT (NAE) 1-23, 1-38 Thorton Creek, WA (NWS) 29-13, 29-20, 29-28 Threemile Creek, Mobile, LA (SAM) 10-19, 10-31 Thurman to Hamburg, IA (NWO) 26-9, 26-22, 26-29 Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR (NWP) 28-9, 28-32, 28-41 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-32 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-12, 18-17, 18-23, 18-25 Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), AR (SWL) 37-5, 37-25 Tolchester Channel, S-Turn, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4- 28, 4-37 Toledo Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-10, 20-18, 20-34 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH (LRH) 25-12, 25-19, 25-20, 25- 25 Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-31 Tombigbee River & Tributaries, MS & AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-31, 10-41 Toronto Lake, KS (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-25, 38-28 Touissaint River, OH (LRB) 20-11, 20-18, 20- 44 Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 39- 16, 39-22 Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NAE) 1-28, 1-40, 1-50 Town Creek, SC (SAC) 7-6, 7-13, 7-19 Townshend Lake, VT (NAE) 1-20, 1-37 Trinidad Lake, CO (SPA) 36-9, 36-15 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 40-13, 40-26, 40-44, 40-53, 40-58 Trinity River Project, TX (SWF) 39-3, 39-18 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV (SPL) 33-10, 33-15, 33-26 Tucson Diversion Channel (Recreation Development) (SPL) 33-10, 33-15, 33-26 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY (LRN) 23-6, 23-10 Tully Lake, MA (NAE) 1-20, 1-37 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees, OK (SWT) 38- 11, 38-21, 38-25 Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO (NWK) 27-7, 27-14, 27-20 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAC) 7-8, 7-13, 7-20 Turning Basin #3, Seattl, WA (NWS) 29-13, 29-21, 29-28 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS (NWK) 27-7, 27-14, 27-20, 27-30 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4-28, 4-37 Two Rivers Dam, NM (SPA) 36-10, 36-15 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (LRE) 21-37, 21-69, 21-86, 21-94 Tybee Island, GA (SAS) 8-5, 8-11, 8-18 U Umpqua River, OR (NWP) 28-10, 28-32, 28-41 Unalaska Harbor, AK (POA) 32-5, 32-11, 32- 15, 32-19 Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-12, 18-17, 18-23, 18-25 Union River, ME (NAE) 1-14, 1-35, 1-48 Union Village Dam, VT (NAE) 1-20, 1-37 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-20, 10-31, 10-41 Upper Jordan, UT (SPK) 35-26, 35-43 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (MVS) 14-7 Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study (MVR) 15-3, 15-9, 15-13 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI (MVR) 15-4, 15-9 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP)(MVP) 16-2 I-24 V Van Bibber Creek, CO (MWO) 26-9, 26-22, 26- 29 Ventura Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-21, 33-30, 33-32 Vermilion Harbor, OH (LRB) 20-11, 20-18, 20- 35 Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-31, 10-41 Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) (NAO) 5-14 Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) (NAO) 5-14 W W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-23 W.R. Grace, Curtis Bay, MD (NAB) 4-26 WV and PA Flood Control (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4- 39 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN (LRL) 24-6, 24-17, 24-23 Wabash River Basin (LRL) 24-13, 24-36 Waco Lake, TX (SWF) 39-13, 39-22, 39-27 Waco Lake, TX (Safety Dam) (SWF) 39-13, 39- 23, 39-27 Wallisville Lake, TX (SWG) 40-14 Walnut Creek, CA (SPK) 35-27, 35-44 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-24, 10-32, 10-48 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-25 Washington Harbor, DC (NAB) 4-9, 4-28, 4-37 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-22, 6-29 Waterway on the Coast of VA (NAO) 5-12 Waukegan Harbor, IL (LRC) 22-8, 22-18, 22-24, 22-27 Waurika Lake, OK (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-26 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK (SWT) 38-14, 38-23, 38-26, 38-29 Wehrspann Lake Aquatic (NWO) 26-13, 26-24, 26-30, 26-47 Wells Harbor, ME (NAE) 1-14, 1-35, 1-48 West Agurs, LA, Levee (MVK) 12-7 West Bank of the Mississippi River, Vicinity of New Orleans, LA (MVN) 11-9, 11- 14, 11-18 West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-40 West Columbus, OH (LRH) 25-12, 25-20, 25-25, 25-30 West Des Moines, IA (MVR) 5-6, 5-10, 5-13 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (LRL) 24-13, 24-20 West Hill Dam, MA (NAE) 1-16, 1-36 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA (SAM) 10-24, 10-32, 10-42 West Sacramento, CA (SPK) 35-28, 35-44, 35- 48 West Thompson Lake, CT (NAE) 1-27, 1-40 West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control (LRP) 18-6 Westville Lake, MA (NAE) 1-27, 1-40 Wetland and Other Aquatic Habitat Creation Under Special Authorization (SAJ) 9-39, (NAP) 3-19 White Lake Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-37, 21-70, 21-86 White River Basin (Little Rock District, AR & MO) (SWL) 37-8, 37-17, 37-21, 37-29 White River, Batesville, AR (SWL) 37-8, 37-18, 37-24 White River, IN (LRL) 24-6, 24-17, 24-26 White River, Indianapolis Central Waterfront, IN (LRL) 24-6, 24-17, 24-26 White River, Jacksonport, AR (SWL) 37-9, 37- 18, 37-22, 37-24 White River to Newport, AR (MVM) 13-3, 13-4 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI (LRE) 21-38, 21- 70, 21-86 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-10, 33-16, 33-26 Whitney Lake, TX (SWF) 39-16, 39-23 Whitney Point Lake, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-31 Whitney Point Village, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-32 Wicomico River, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-28, 4-37 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA, (SPK) 35-29, 35-44 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR (NWP) 28-10, 28-32, 28-41 Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR (NWP) 28-17, 28-32, 28-43 Willamette River Temperature Control, OR (NWP) 28-26, 28-35, 28-46 I-25 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (NWS) 29-7, 29-18, 29-25 Z Willapa River, Raymond, WA (NWS) 29-10 William H. Harsha Lake, OH (LRL) 24-14, No entries 24-20 Williamsport Hagerman's Flume (NAB) 4-14, 4-30, 4-39 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR (NWP) 28-17, 28-34, 28-43 Wilmington Harbor, DE (NAP) 3-10, 3-22, 3-29 Wilmington Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-22 Wilson Harbor, NY (LRB) 20-11, 20-19, 20-35 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS (NWK) 27-8, 27- 14, 27-20, 27-30 Winfield, KS (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-26 Winter Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-15 Wister Lake, OK (SWT) 38-11, 38-21, 38-26, 38-28 Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY (LRN) 23-8, 23-10 Wood River, Grand Island, NE (NOW) 26-9, 26-22, 26-29 Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (LRP) 18-12, 18-17, 18-23, 18-25 Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (NAE) 1-15, 1- 35, 1-49 Work Under Continuing Authority Program (NAO) 5-13 Work Under Special Authorization (SWF) 39- 14, 39-31, (MVM) 13-2 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 39- 13, 39-23, 39-28 Wrightsville Beach, NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-23 Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) (NAB) 4- 21, 4-32, 4-40 Y Yadkin River Basin, NC and SC (SAW) 6-14 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR (NWP) 28-11, 28-32, 28-42 Yaquina River, OR (NWP) 28-12, 28-32, 28-42 Yatesville Lake, KY (LRH) 25-12, 25-20, 25-25 York, Indian Rock Dam, PA (NAB) 4-22, 4-33, 4-40 Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD (LRP) 18-13, 18-17, 18-23, 18-25, 18-28 York River, VA (NAO) 5-13 I-26